HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-12-2013 ph1 2013 parking fund reviewI councrL
âqenòa pepopt
McctingDatc
June 12,2013
Iæm Number
PH,1
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
FROM:
Prepared By:
Daryl R. Grigsby, Director of Public Works
Robert Horch, Parking Services Manager
SUBJECTz 2013 PARIflNG FUND REVIE\ry
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Review and accept the2013 annual Parking Fund Review;
2. Conceptually approve the 2013-14 Parking Fund budget, '\¡/ith final action on June 17,2013 with
the adoption of the 2013-15 Financial Plan;
3. Adopt a resolution increasing parking citation fines to $388 for disabled parking violations to
cover the cost of the County of San Luis Obispo's disabled linkage surcharge; and
4. Adopt a resolution approving an increase of a l0-hour residential meter permit to Sl20 ayear
effective July 1, 2013.
REPORT.IN.BRIEF
This report presents the annual Parking Fund Review and highlights that this fund is healtþ in its
abilrty to support both current and anticipated expenses, capital projects, and debt service
obligations. Additionally, the Parking Fund is able to maintain the minimum 20o/o reserve level in
working capital in accordance with the City Financial Management policies. The Parking Fund
started this fiscal year with just under $6 million in working capital. Ir20I2-I3 FY, the addition of
Sunday parking services, the development of a new super-core of credit card capable meters, and
the addition of weekend residential parking enforcement have contributed to the healtþ fund
balance to support capital improvement projects (CIP) and significant program operating changes
(SOPCÐ contained in this report. These three changes have contributed toward an increase in
services and provided for better management of parking throughout the City. Significant work has
been undertaken to establish the new "No Ovemight Camping" ordinance. Staff continues to work
on modifications to the Oversized Vehicle & Trailer ordinance.
Two development projects contribute to make the most significant changes in the financial position
projections for the Parking Fund. The Garden Sheet Terraces project is currently being redesigned
to address economic atdreal estate realities which will likely change the mix of uses in the project.
In anticipation of this change, funding projections were moved out to the 2015-16 FY, the soonest
the project could occur. The Chinatown project has now been phased such that the first component
is the Monterey Street development assumed to begin in July 2014 and the second phase, the hotel
development, is not within this five-year window. Both of these projects eliminate public parking
and increase downtown parking demand. The project delays and potential downsizing posþone the
need to build the Palm-Nipomo parking structure. As a result, the Palm-Nipomo parking structure
capital project has been reprogrammed into the2017-18 FY to show the initial funding impact.
PH1-1
2013 Parking Fund Review Page2
This report will briefly touch on some of the accomplishments of the past year and provide
information on all Parking Fund revenues with specific analysis of Sunday parking and the credit
card parking meters. This report seeks Council approval of two resolutions to increase disabled
parking fines to cover a County surcharge and to increase the lO-hour residential parking permits to
eliminate inequities with other long-term parking permits.
Overall, the City of San Luis Obispo's Parking Program continues to manage parking supply to
create the availability, tumover, and utilization necessary to ensure an economically vibrant
downtown.
DISCUSSION
2012-13 Parkin g Acco mplishments
Although the Fund Review is focused on financial and budgetary information, it is important to look
back at the accomplishments that have occurred during this past fiscal year. Council's approval of
the Parking Fund budget allows the City to provide improved services and support. The following
is a list of highlights that Parking Services has accomplished inthe2012-13 fiscal year.
Full implementation of Sunday Parking Services from 1 pm to 6 pm.
Full year with 404 new credit card capable meters in the downtown super-core.
Replacement of over 169 sign posts, 341 "No Parking 3 AM to 5 AM" signs, and other
parking signs.
Expansion of Lot 11 by removal of the Yung Building as part of the Chinatown project.
Neighborhood Wellness goal implementation (weekend neighborhood parking
enforcement).
No Overnight camping ordinance research and implementation.
Research and study of Oversized Vehicle & Trailer ordinance.
Work on the proposed Highland Drive residential parking district.
Continued work with stakeholders to update the Railroad Square parking management
program.
10. New awnings on the Chorro Street side of the Marsh Street structure.
11. Hired and trained new Parking Services staff.
i2. Continued representation of the City as the Downtown Champion by the Parking
Manager.
Parking Revenues
Parking revenues have not only stabilized, but have increased due to some of the service changes
approved by the City Council in 2011. Sunday parking, credit card meters, and weekend residential
parking enforcement have provided additional revenues and have performed better than projected.
Table 1 shows Parking revenue trends with actuals from the four previous fiscal years, a revised
projection for this current fiscal year, and the projected budgeted amounts for the two years of the
20 13 -I 5 Financial Plan.
Most Parking revenue sources are showing a slow and steady increase with better than expected
revenues associated with Sunday parking and the credit card meters. Parking fines are tp by 30Yo
due to Sundays and the weekend enforcement of residential neighborhoods which is part of the
Neighborhood Wellness goal. Long term parking is showing a slight decline of 3Yo over the
previous year. This decline can be attributed to employees utilizing other parking located outside of
PH1 .2
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
2013 Parking Fund Review Page 3
the downtown or the Parking Fund-subsidized Downtown Access Pass for SLO Transit. This trend
may be shorl-lived as the economy improves and downtown employees opt back into long term
parking programs. Parking in-lieu fees are typically "lumpy", as these revenues ale directly tied to
significant redevelopment projects (such as Chinatown and Garden Street Terraces). Overall, the
Parking Fund revenues are showing slow and steady increases as the economy is lecovering.
Table i Fund Revenue Trends
* ChinatowrÌ Development impact
Sunda)¡ Parkin g S ervices
Sunday parking enforcement offlrcially began in June 2012. Over 341 new parking signs and 1,500
meter stickers were installed which provided the public notice of the new hours of enforcement
(fi'om 1 pm to 6 p-). Original projections were that the City would leceive approximately $212,350
in gross revenues with expenses of $45,215; a net increase of $167,135 annually. The table below
shows that the increase in Sunday parking revenue has exceeded the original 2011 Council
approved estimates by 5l% with expenses being lower than originally plojected, generating a total
net revenue of $251,900 annually.
Table2 Revenue
The CIP project for parking sign replacements as parl of the Sunday seryice change was budgeted at
$102,500. With net revenues being greater than projected, the Parking Sign capital project has been
paid for in less bhan a year's time. All subsequent revenues from Sunday parking will be a net
benefit to the Fund and will assist in covering operating cost increases as well as support building
the Palm-Nipomo parking structure.
Credit Card Meters
Similarly, the credit card meter program has been more successful than anticipated. The new super-
core parkingzoîe was established with 396 new credit card capable meters in March 2012, allowtng
the public the option to pay by coin or credit card at a rate of $ 1 .50 an hour. Later, additional meters
were added in Parking Lot 11 with the removal of the Yung Building as part of the Chinatown
project. This brings the total number of credit card capable meters to 404.
2008-09
Actual
2009-r0
Actual
2010-11
Actual
20tt-12
Actual
2012-13
RevisedRevenues
2013-t4 2014-15
525,1 00
1,31 1,900
822,600
387,600
216,100
18,400
701,300
466,600*
1,325,000
863,800
391,500
218,300
855, I 00
708,300
119 700 95
362,800
1,036,000
'743,000
376,900
216,400
1 5,100
110,500
392,100
1,1,41,900
113,700
349,900
204,800
1 2,900
690,500
402,900
1 ,1 93,000
'739,500
364,200
209,300
15,400
645,500
426,142
1,204,153
756,008
394,569
204,143
4,449
s36,669
8 14,500
383,800
210,100
822,300
694,400
Totals 3 797 3 73
15 916 8 900100292165
519,90
1,298,on Street
Lots
king Fines
In-Lieu
Stluctures
Long-Term Parking
I 700
2071
Btimate
2013
Proiection
o//o
Increase
284,200
32,300
Net Revenues 167.135 251.900 , styo
PH1 -3
2013 Parking Fund Review Page 4
The intent of the super-core rate increase (from $1.25 to $1.50 per hour) and credit card meters was
to reduce on-street parking demand in this area and encourage more parking in structures which is
offered at hall the hourþ rate with the first 60 minutes free. This has not fully occurred since
observed occupancy rates of these meter locations appears similar to pre-super core implementation.
Table 3 shows the original estimated credit card meter revenues and expenses compared to the
proj ected 20 I 3 fiscal year revenues.
Table 3: Credit Card Meter Revenue
Table 3 shows a 54o/o increase in revenues as more people are using credit cards than anticipated.
Because of the increased credit card use, expenses for merchant fees have also increased. Original
expense estimates were based on an avemge of 25 credit card transactions a month/per meter.
Currently, card use has doubled and is averaging 48 credit card transactions a month/per meter. The
merchant fees covering all credit card vendors are higher than anticipated. However, the increase in
merchant fee expenses has been ofÊset by the significant increase in credit card meter revenues. As
noted above, the public is utilizing the credit card meters more often than anticipated. The original
revenue projection was conservative at 20o/o qedit card use and 80o/o coin use. Currently, the
Parking Fund is averaging 38olo revenues from the usage of credit cards. Table 3 above indicates a
net revenue increase of 28% over the original projection.
The impact of the credit cards meters has been quite positive for the consumer. Offering the public
two forms of payment (coin and credit card) means a customer is less likely to receive a parking
citation as a result of having insufficient change. The customer can pre-pay the meter if they park
prior to the hours of charged parking. If the customer contests a meter citation, City staff can
immediately access the meter software to determine the time the meter expired or if there was a
problem with it. In addition, the meter system provides text messages to City staff when the meters
are not working properly. These meters will help lay the foundation for the City to explore
additional options of ground sensors that will show when spaces are occupied or unoccupied. This
data could be used for the City to determine on-street occupancy rates and be used for smart phone
applications that can tell the public where available parking is located. The credit card capable
meters can provide opportunities for better customer service, options for future services, and
increased data transfer that assists City staff in analyzing parking demand. One complaint has been
the displacement of Cash Key meters in the super-core area. Unfortunately, the cash key technology
is proprietary to a meter company that does not offer credit card acceptance.
The success of these meters raises the question of whether to expand their availabiltty in other areas.
Staff believes there is some potential for expansion but caution should be exercised since not all
meter areas will result in the same positive results due to differences in parking demand, meter rates,
and off street parking capaclty.
In the future, the Chinatown and Garden Street Terraces development projects will remove 272
parking spaces that currently have the credit card capable meters. One possibility is that Parking
PH1 .4
I;}
231,7r0232,635
97es
| 244,800 377,600 ,
Net Rerænues , 218,475 280,200 28o/"
2013 Parking Fund Review Page 5
Services moves these meters to other areas of high parking demand as these parking spaces are
taken out of seruice. This would avoid substantial up front capital costs for meter purchase and
allow maximum return on investment. Other meter zones with $0.75 per hour rates may not bring in
enough revenue to cover the monthly credit card meter merchant expenses.
Disabled Linkage SLO County Surcharge- New Issue
In 2012, the Cþ was made aware that the San Luis Obispo (SLO) County Board of Supervisors
passed a resolution establishing a surcharge called "disabled linkage" on disabled parking violations
pursuant to California Penal Code $1465.5. By law, these funds are used for SLO County selices
for case management for the frail, elderly, and functionally impaired adults. California Penal Code
$ 1465.5 states:
An assessment of two dollars ($2)for every ten dollars (810) orfraction thereof,
for every fine, forfeihlre, or parking penalty imposed and collected pursuant to
Section 42001.13 of the Vehicle Code for violation of Section 22507.8 of the
Vehicle Code, may be imposed by each county upon the adoption of a resolution
by the board of supervisors. An assessment imposed by thß section shall be
collected and disbursed as provided in Section 9545 of the Welfare and
Institutions Code.
This fure is levied for parkìng in handicapped parking spaces without proper disabled license plates
or placards. The City's fine for a disabled parking fine is currently $288; which is comprised of a
$250 base fine plus $25.00 retained for disabled parking maintenance, plus $13.00 in State and
County surcharges. Under the code shown above, the surcharge would be calculated based on the
City's base disabled parking f,rne of $250. The additional assessment of two dollars for every ten
dollars of the base fine would equate to $50 of an additional surcharge to be paid by the City to the
County. (Example: ($250 +10) x 2: $50).
Consistent with past practice, all parking fine surcharges have been raised to cover any new
surcharge amount so that other rate payers are not subsidizing fine activþ and the City is kept
whole, i.e. not losing revenue with every fine collection. Parking Services is recommending that
City Council approve a $50 increase to the disabled parking fine from $288 to $338 to cover this
surcharge. Without an increase to the fine structure, the Parking Fund will lose the ability to retain
$50 on every paid parking citation for a disabled parking violation. The number of paid disabled
parking citations is relatively low every year so staff does not expect much push back from the
public. These violations are usually paid by a non-disabled person parking in a space dedicated for
the disabled.
Ten Hour Residential Meter Permit Increase
This issue is a carryover from last year's fund review. kì 1991 the City Council approved a permit
program for select downtown residents who live adjacent to lO-hour parking meter zones and have
no off-street parking available. The program is limited to 2 permits for each qualified downtown
residential property. The program fee was set at $5 per year. At the time of approval the pricing
rationale was kept low due to the parking meter district expansion into areas with single family
residential properties. The permit amount has not been increased in 22 years and the fees do not
cover the cost of the permit issuance, printing costs and staff time to process and verif, the permit
applications. This is not an issue of a loss of significant revenue but an issue of equity with other
parking permit fees.
PH1 -5
2013 Parking Fund Review Page 6
The l0-hour annual permit fee is not consistent with other pricing strategies and permits offered by
Parking Services. For example, employees can purchase a l0-hour meter permit offered at $40 a
month ($480 per year), downtown residents can park overnight at 842 Palm Street structure at a rate
of $60 a month ($720 per year). Based on the expenses for the City to provide the lO-hour
residential permit and in keeping consistent with other relative parking progrcm fees, staff is
recommending Council approve a permit increase to $10 per month ($120 per year).
Public notice has been provided to all64 addresses that qualiff for this type of permit. Cunently 39
permits have been issued for the year.
Table 4: l0-Hour Residential Meter Fee
FISCAL IMPACT
Attached to this report is a detailed analysis of the Parking Fund revenues, expenditures, and
changes in financial position. The 2013 Parking Fund Analysis includes the key assumptions used
in preparing Fund projections. Consistent with the analysis presented to the Council in this report
and in the Preliminæy 2013-15 Financial Plan, there are sufficient funds to support operations,
capital projects, and debt service needs ofthe Parking Fund.
ALTERNATIVE
Council, at its discretion, can adopt all or part of the of the requested significant operating program
changes, capital improvement projects, or revenue enhancements presented in the 2013 Parking
Fund Analysis and Preliminary 2013-15 Financial Plan.
ATTACHMENTS
a. Exhibit A - Updated Fine Schedule
3. Resolution Increasing lO-hour Residential Meter Permit Fees.
1.
2.
10-IIr Residential 120
Downtown l.0-IIr Meter $¿o 480
s 720
Reports\20139013-06-12\Parking Fund Review (Grigsby-Bochum-Horcþ\CAR 2013 Pkg Fund Reviewdocx
PH1 -6
ATTACHMENT 1
Parking Enterprise Fund
2013-15 Financial Plan
Parking Enterprise Fund
2013 Fund Analysis
Jvne 12,2013
PH1 .7
Attachment 1
Page 2
2013 Parking Fund
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
I. OVERVIEW
III. 2OII.I3 FINANCIAL PLAN
a.
b.
c.
d.
m.
1.
2.
Summary of Operating Programs
Capital Improvement Program....
Revenues
Debt Service................
ASSLIMPTIONS.........
General Assumptions ..................
Parking Lots ...........
3 . Street Parking .... ..
4. Parking Structures..
5. Long Term Parking
6. Parking Leases
7. Parking In-Lieu
8. Investment Earnings.........
9. Parking Fines .........
10
11
t2.
Transportation & General Government Expenses
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Expenses..........
Debt Service ................
PH1 -8
J
J
J
4
4
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
8
8
9IV. EXHIBIT A-2013-15 Changes in Financial Position
Attachment 1
Page 3
cffiy o[
sân Lurs oBrspo
2013 Parking Fund Report
I. OVERVIEW
This report presents the financial condition of the Parking Fund, based on the preliminary
2013-15 Financial Plan for operating program budgets, and recommends program and
capital requests to address the identified needs in the Parking and Access Plan. The
Chinatown and Garden Street Terraces projects have been programmed into this budget
cycle, however these projects may or may not occur in the time frames projected. The
Palm Nipomo parking structure is programed in January 2018 to show the future fiscal
impacts to the Parking Fund. This report also reflects the conclusion of the debt service
for the 842 Palm Street and original Marsh Street structures in 2014-15. This review
highlights a healthy fund in its ability to support both current and anticipated expenses,
capital projects, and debt service obligations while maintaining the minimtm 20o/o
reserve level in working capital in accordance with the City Financial Management
policies.
II. 2011-13 F'INANCIAL PLAN
a. Summary of Operating Programs
Below is the summary of the 2013-15 Financial Plan operating budget projections
for the Parking Services Enterprise Fund.
Staffing
Contract Services
Other Operating Expenses
SOPC Fire Alarm Testing/Inspection
SOPC Pkg Staff Org. Assessment
Credits
$ 1,195,600 $
s s77,400 $
$ 302,200 $
1,225,400
s93,600
310,700
$ 1,256,100
$ 610,200
$ 319,400
$ 8,800 $ 9,000 $ 9,300
$$$
Total Parking Services 2,061,900 2,116,100 2,164,500
The Fund Analysis includes two significant operating program changes (SOPC).
One SOPC recommendation is to increase funding for additional state mandatory
fire alarm testing and inspection. The second SOPC is recommended for the
Parking Fund Organizational Assessment and will provide funding for additional
contract services and interim temporary staffing to support basic parking
functions during this time. The SOPC also includes a reduction in contract
services for the loss of parking lots due to redevelopments like Garden Street
Terraces and Chinatown.
PH1 -9
Attachment 1
Page 4
b. Capital Improvement Program
Below is the summaly of the 2013-15 Financial Plan capital project budget
projections for the Parking Services Enterprise Fund. The table below shows the
20I3-I5 Capital Improvement Program and assumptions for capital projects in the
Parking Fund. The Palm-Nipomo Parking Structure is plojected for January 2018;
the earliest date at which construction could occur.
Parking Lot Resurfacing (ots 2,3,11) $
Fleet Replacement: 2 Go-4s $
Fleet Replacement: Administration Vehicle $
Fleet Replacement: Utility Vehicle
Retrofit of 919 Palm Stairs s
Palm Nipomo Conshuction
Marsh Lighting Replacement $
Mobil Lifts & Safety Stands
IT MS Office Replacement
IT Document Management $
IT Filewalls $
IT Network Sectrrity Upgrades $
IT Network Switching Repl.
IT Enterprise Storage Growth $
IT Radio Replacement
IT Storage Capacity Upgrade
Debt Service Proiections in Out Years*
9s,000
78,800
27,100
50,000
I 30,000
$ 27,100
$ 23,600,000
$
$
2,000
5,700
$ 9.500
2,400
5,500
3,1 00
r,300
$
$
1 0,1 00
5,600
$ 209 . 100 $187.900
Total Parking Capital Program S 393,200 $ 17,200 $ 209,100 $ 215,000 $ 23,615,700
c. Revenues
Parking Fund revenues have increased with the addition of credit card parking
meters and Sunday parking in2012. Like other City revenues, it is anticipated that
revenues will continue to steadily gro\M with the economy. Revenue projections
assume a conservative lo/o annual growth. A periodic rate adjustment of 10 % is
assumed in 2015-16 and every 3 years thereafter.
20t2-13 z0t3-14 2014-15 201 5-ló 20t6-t'7 2011 -l
Year-End
Revßed
Revenues
Service Charges
Parking Meter Collections
Lots
Streets
Parking Structure Collections
Long-Term Parking Revenues
Lease Revenues
Parking hr-Lieu Fees
Other Service Charges
Total Service Charges
lnvestment and Property Revenues
Fines and Forfeitures
Other Revenues
Total Revenues
519,900
1,298,900
I I 4,500
383,800
210,t00
822,200
t00
319,400
r,619,300
1,t29,200
439,300
41 1,200
I 9,600
100
525,100
r,3l 1,900
822,600
387,600
216,100
18,300
100
325300
t,4s1,500
1,039,000
430,600
403, I 00
t,860,000
100
328,600
I,412,100
l,l I 1,100
434,900
401,200
1 9,1 00
100
3,173,100
I r 0,800
605,100
4,049,500
88,900
694,400
5,5 I 5,600
84,500
599, I 00
3,93 8, I 00
I 10,200
601,200
4,832,800 , ''1,102,700 '4923''800. 6'199,200 4,489,000 4,649,500
PH1 - 10
Aüachment 1
Page 5
d. Debt Service
Debt Service for 842 Palm and the original Marsh parking structures ends in
2014-15. Debt Service for the Palm - Nipomo Parking Structure is scheduled to
begin in January 2018, the earliest date the project could occur.
842 Palm & Marsh
Marsh Expansion
919 Palm
Palm-Nipomo
Dispatch Center Upgrade
until Jun 2014
until Aug 203 I
until Jun 2036
untìl 2048
until Jun 2039
420,577
540,439
419,729
539,899
418,856
538,755
179,621
970,800 969,400 1,147,000
III.ASSUMPTIONS
The following assumptions have been programmed into the long term forecâst of the
Parking Fund. The Chinatown and Garden Street Terraces projects will impact three of
the City's parking lots. For consistency in Fund projections, the estimated project dates
are assumed at the soonest the projects could occur. If the projects occur later than
anticipated, it will allow for additional revenues to accumulate for the Fund.
1. General Assumptions
Minimum working capital (reserve) should equal at least 20Yo of the total Operating
Program expenditures according to the City's fiscal policy and Standard and Poor's rating
criteria. Based upon this policy, the minimum reserve level should be approximately
$500,000 to $600,000. The year-end working capital greatly exceeds the minimum
reserve policy levels.
2. Parking Lots
a. Assumes a conservative 7o/o growth in parking demand.
b. Consistent with previously adopted policies, 70o/o rate increases are assumed for
2015-16, and every 3 years thereafter for periodic rate adjustments.
c. The Memorandum of Agreement between the City of San Luis Obispo and
Garden Street SLO Partners, L.P., assumes that all parking spaces for Lot 2 will
be eliminated when the project begins. The soonest this will occur is July 2015.
All parking-related direct revenues will cease for this location in2015-16.
d. The first phase of the Chinatown project that removes parking for the Monterey
Street development will reduce parking revenues in Parking Lots 3 & 11 by
approximately 4I parking spaces. It is assumed that there will be an approximate
loss of 25% of parking revenue in Lot 3 and a32Yo loss of parking revenue in Lot
11. The soonest this will occur is July 2014.
e. It is anticipated that some of the drivers that would have parked in Lots 2, 3, and
11 will instead park in garages due to the loss of lot parking spaces. With the first
hour free policy in garages, it is anticipated that only 50Yo of the revenues
formally tied to Lots 2, 3, and 1 1 will be retained through garage parking fees.
f. Parking revenues from Lot 14 will cease due to the construction of the Palm-
Nipomo parking structure in20l7 -18.
PH1 - 11
Attachment 1
Page 6
g. It is anticipated that the drivers that park in Lot 14 will shift to buying 10 hour
meter permits when Palm-Nipomo construction begins on the site of Lot 14 in
20t7-18.
3. Street Parking
a. Assumes a conservative lo/o growth in parking demand.
b. Consistent with previously adopted policies, I0o/o rate increases are assumed for
2015-16, and every 3 years thereafter for periodic rate adjustments.
4. Parking Structures
a. Assumes a conservative lo/o growth in parking demand.
b. Consistent with previously adopted policies, l0o/o rate increases are assumed for
2015-16, and every 3 years thereafter for periodic rate adjustments.
c. It is anticipated that some of the drivers that would have parked in Lots 2, 3, and
11 will instead park in garages due to the loss of lot parking spots. Due to the
first hour free policy in garages, it is anticipated that only 50% of the revenues
formerly tied to Lots 2,3, and I 1 will be retained through garage parking fees.
5. Long Term Parking
a. Assumes a conservative l%o growth in parking demand.
b. Consistent with previously adopted policies, IÙYo rate increases are assumed for
2015-16, and every 3 years thereafter for periodic rate adjustments.
c. The proposed lO-hour Residential Meter Permit increase is not included in the
revenue projections.
6. Parking Leases
a. Assumes a conservative IYo growth in parking demand.
b. Lease revenue of approximately $2,000 a year for trash leases in Parking Lot 2
will cease beginning in July 2015 due to the Garden Street Terraces Project.
c. Section 16 of the Memorandum of Agreement between the City of San Luis
Obispo and Garden Street SLO Partners, L.P. states that the Parking Fund will
loan the developer $2.4 million, assumed in 2015-16. In 2015-16, the developer
will begin repayment to the City Parking Fund by paying approximately $165,000
per year for 30 years.
7. Parking In-Lieu
a. Garden Street in-lieu fees are a result of lost parking spaces due to the Garden
Street Terraces Project. Section 14 of the Memorandum of Agreement between
the City of San Luis Obispo and Garden Street SLO Partners, L.P., states that the
parking in-lieu fee will be $1,860,000 (62 parking spaces x $30,000/parking
space) for the spaces lost due to the Garden Street Terrace Project. Estimated to
occur in 2015-16. The one-time payment for the replacement of the on-site public
parking removed for Garden Street Terrace Project in Lot 2 is not adjusted by CPI
according to clause 14 of the Memorandum of Agreement.
PH1 - 12
Attachment 1
b. According to the agreement for the Chinatown project, the developer is
responsible for payment of in-lieu fees for the unmet parking demand of the
Monterey Street development. Staff estimates that number at 45 spaces. (45 x
19,000 : 800,820). Estimated to occur in2014-15.
c. According to the agreement for the Chinatown and the EIR mitigation measure
San Luis Obispo Resolution No. 9960, Section 4 states that the parking in-lieu fee
will be adjusted on July 1 of each year by the annual percentage change in the
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer price index for all urban consumers for
the prior calendar year. This is estimated at 2.8Yo for the five (5) years within this
report. The one-time payment for the replacement of public parking removed for
the Chinatown Project is adjusted by CPI according to the Agreement.
8. Investment Earnings
a. Assumes projected interest earnings of 2Yo annually
9. Parking Fines
a. Assumes a conseryative lYo growth in parking demand.
b. Transfer of parking fines to the Police Department is approximately $103,000
annually.
c. State and County surcharges of $13 per paid parking citation is added then
deducted from fine revenues.
d. A total I}Yo decrease in fine revenues is due to the loss of 62 parking spaces
resulting from the construction of the Garden Street Terraces Project starting in
20t5-t6.
e. Parking fine revenues are not reduced for the loss of 41 parking spaces resulting
from the construction of the first phase of the Chinatown Project-Monterey Street
development starting in20l4-I5 because it is currently under-used.
f. A total IYo decrease in fine revenues due to the loss of Lot 14 for the construction
of Palm-Nipomo parking structure in 2017-18.
g. lïYo rate increases are assumed for 2015-16, and every 3 years thereafter for
periodic fine adjustments.
h. The proposed $50 increase of the disabled parking fine to $338 to cover the
County Linkage surcharge is not included in the revenue projections.
10. Transportation & General Government Expenses
a. Transportation operating expenses will increase by $8,400 in2013-14 and $8,600
in 2014-15 in response to the SOPC request for additional state mandated fire
alarm testing and inspection.
b. Transportation operating expenses will increase by $77,400 in 2013-14 and
$16,200 in 2014-15 in response to the SOPC request for the Parking
O r ganizational A s s e s s ment and S taff,rn g Ret enti on.
c. Transportation operating expenses attributed to Parking Lot 2 will decrease by
$22,100 in2015-16 and thereafter.
PH1 - 13
Attachment'l
Page 8
d. Transportation operating expenses attributed to Parking Lot 14 will decrease by
$7,400 in2017-I8 and thereafter.
e. Contract Services cost adjustments reflect projected annual CPI increases of l.7o/o
in 20 I 3 - | 4, 2Yo in 20 I 4 - I 5, and 2. 5o/o thereafter.
f. General Government expenses were increased by $75,600 annually to $699,300 in
20I3-I4 due to recent changes in the City's methodology for calculating direct
and indirect costs in the Cost Allocation Plan.
g. One time repayment of the Parking Fund's portion of the CaIJPIA increase of
S83,500 occurs in2013-14 (found in Other Sources line).
h. Non-staffing savings of 2.25% bi-annually are programmed beginning 20I4-I5,
and20l6-17 (found in Other Sources - Savings Non-Staffing).
i. Staffing savings of 2o/o are programmed in 2014-15 and 2.5o/o annually thereafter
(found in Other Sources - Savings Staffing).
j CalPers costs will see an increase of Io/o in 2014-15 and another lo/o in 2015-16
and annually thereafter (found in Other Sources - PERS Contribution).
11. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Expenses
a. The Palm Nipomo parking structure construction is estimated at $23.6 million in
2017-18. There will be a $6,000,000 contribution from working capital and
$17,600,000 proceeds from debt financing or Bond Issuance.
b. Assumes Finance and Information Technology capital projects that have
associated Parking Fund support will occur in the projected years.
12.Debt Service
ù. Debt service for the 2004 Lease Revenue Bonds for 842 Palm Street and original
Marsh Street parking structures ends in 2014-15, reducing annual bond payments
by $500,000 annually.
b. Assumes a3}-year level debt service at 5.5o/o,no capitalized interest, net proceeds
of $17,600,000 and bond issuance on January 1, 2018. Interest pa5rment and
principal payment is due beginning in 2017-18, estimated at $1.3 million
annually.
PH1 - 14
Attachment 1
Page 9
IV. EXHIBIT A - 2013-15 Changes in Financial Position
2OI3-15 PARKII{G FUND
FINANCIAL SCHEDULES
.-,
PH1 - 15
Ye
a
r
-
E
n
d
Re
v
i
s
e
d
20t7-1820t 6-t'7 Proiection
20
t
5
-
t
6
20
r
4
-
t
5
20
1
3
-
t
4
Pr
o
i
e
c
t
i
o
n
20
1
2
-
1
3
20
t
l
-
1
2
Proiection
Pr
o
i
e
c
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
i
e
c
t
i
o
n
Ac
t
u
a
l
CH
A
N
G
E
S
IN
FI
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
PO
S
I
T
I
O
N
-
PA
R
K
I
N
G
FU
N
D
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
Se
w
i
c
e
Ch
a
r
g
e
s
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Me
t
e
r
Co
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
Lo
t
s
St
r
e
e
t
s
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
St
m
c
t
u
r
e
Co
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
Lo
n
g
-
T
e
r
m
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
Le
a
s
e
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
In
-
L
i
e
u
Fe
e
s
Ot
h
e
r
Se
w
i
c
e
Ch
a
r
g
e
s
To
t
a
l
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Ch
a
r
g
e
s
In
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
an
d
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
Fi
n
e
s
an
d
Fo
r
f
e
i
t
u
r
e
s
Ot
h
e
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
To
t
a
l
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
Go
v
e
m
m
e
n
t
To
t
a
l
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
De
b
t
Se
r
v
i
c
e
To
t
a
l
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
Ot
h
e
r
So
u
r
c
e
s
(U
s
e
s
)
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
No
n
-
S
t
a
f
f
i
n
g
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
St
a
f
f
i
n
g
PE
R
S
Co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
c
e
e
d
s
fi
o
m
De
b
t
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
Ot
h
e
r
So
u
r
c
e
s
(U
s
e
s
)
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
MO
A
Ad
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
To
t
a
l
Ot
h
e
r
So
u
r
c
e
s
(U
s
e
s
)
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
an
d
Ot
h
e
r
So
u
r
c
e
s
Ov
e
r
(U
n
d
e
r
)
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
an
d
Ot
h
e
r
Us
e
s
Wo
r
k
i
n
g
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
,
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
of
Ye
a
r
52
5
,
1
00
I
,3
I
1,
9
0
0
82
2
,
6
0
0
38
7
,
6
0
0
21
6
,
1
0
0
18
,
3
0
0
10
0
46
6
,
6
0
0
1,
3
2
5
,
O
0
0
86
3
,
8
0
0
39
r,
s
0
0
21
8
,
3
0
0
8s
s
,
0
0
0
10
0
32
5
,
3
0
0
1,
4
5
1
,
5
0
0
1,
0
3
9
,
0
0
0
43
0
,
6
0
0
40
3
,
1
0
0
1,
8
6
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
328,600 1,472,100 1,1 1 1,100 434,900 407,200 1 9,1 00 100319,400 I ,61 9,300 7,129,200 439,300 4r1,200 19,600 100
3,
6
8
2
,
2
4
9
4,
8
3
2
,
8
0
0
4,
1
o
2
,
7
0
0
4,
9
2
3
.
4
O
O
6,
1
9
9
,
2
0
0
4,489,000 4,649,sOO
42
6
,
1
4
2
7,
2
0
4
,
7
5
3
7s
6
,
0
0
8
39
4
,
O
4
1
20
4
,
7
4
3
4,
4
4
9
52
8
2,
9
9
0
,
6
6
4
7s
4
,
9
7
6
s3
6
,
6
6
9
2,
3
5
t
,
3
5
t
48
2
,
2
0
3
1
.5
0
9
.
0
7
1
(6
1
7
,
1
0
0
)
6,
6
0
2
.
2
0
0
51
9
,
9
0
0
1,
2
9
8
,
9
0
0
81
4
,
s
00
38
3
,
8
0
0
21
0
.
1
0
0
82
2
.
2
0
0
10
0
4.
0
4
9
.
5
0
0
88
,
9
0
0
69
4
,
4
0
0
2,
6
3
4
,
5
0
0
I.
8
4
8
.
3
0
0
1,
4
7
4
.
9
0
0
(1
,
2
2
4
,
9
0
0
)
5,
9
8
5
,
10
(
t
3,
2
8
7
,
7
0
0
11
9
,
1
O
0
70
1
,
3
0
0
2,
6
8
8
,
2
0
0
39
3
,
2
0
0
r.
4
7
4
.
6
0
0
(8
3
,
5
0
0
)
(8
3
,
5
0
0
)
(s
3
6
,
8
0
0
)
4,
7
6
0
.
2
0
0
4.
2
2
3
.
4
0
0
4,
7
2
0
,
3
0
0
95
,
2
0
0
70
8
,
3
0
0
60
9
-
3
0
0
2,
6
s
6
,
2
0
0
t7
,
2
0
0
96
9
.
l
00
5,
5
1
5
,
6
0
0
84
,
5
0
0
59
9
,
I
00
60
9
.
3
0
0
2,
6
7
1
,
2
0
0
20
9
,
1
00
97
0
.
8
0
0
29
,
8
8
9
(l
0,
8
0
0
)
(2
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
0
(3
2
,
8
I
1)
s,
5
4
2
,
0
7
5
5.
s
0
9
.
2
6
4
3,773,rOO I 1 0,800 605, I 00 609.300 2,72s,400 215,000 969.4003,938,1 00 I 10,200 601,200 609.300 2,113,800 23,615;700 1.147.000 (s,266,398)6,128,849 862-451 554,76()
1
,8
1
7,
6
5
1
2,
1
00
.
8
0
0
2,
O
'
7
8
,
9
0
0
53
3
.
7
0
0
53
3
.
7
0
0
60
9
.
3
0
0
2,
0
4
6
,
9
0
0
2,
0
6
1
,
9
0
0
2,116,'t00 2,764,500
4,
3
4
2
,
6
2
5
5,
9
5
7
,
7
0
0
4,
5
5
6
,
0
0
0
3,
6
4
2
,
5
0
0
3,
8
5
1
,
L
0
0
3,909,800 27,536.500
19
,
4
4
7
23
,
3
2
8
(s
,
4
0
0
)
20,s49 30,636 (1 0,800)
37
,
3
7
s
(2
,
3
8
0
,
9
1
1
)
3r,402 (r 0,800)1 7,600,000 0 40,385 17,620,602
43
,
2
7
6
(r
00
,
0
0
0
)
43
,
2
7
6
(1
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
0
1,
3
1
8
,
6
7
5
4,
2
2
3
,
4
0
0
s.
5
4
2
.
O
7
5
6l9,s8s 5.509,264 6.128.849
Wo
r
k
i
n
g
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
,
En
d
of
Ye
a
r
20
"
.
4
Re
s
e
n
e
Le
v
e
l
5.
9
8
5
.
1
00
4.
7
6
0
.
2
0
0
53
7
,
6
4
0
53
I,
2
4
0
53
4
,
2
4
0
545,030 PH1 - '^
ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTTON NO. (2013 SERTES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING AN
INCREASE IN DISABLED PARKING CITATION FINES AND SUPERSEDING
INCONSISTENT FINES IN PRIOR RESOLUTIONS
WHEREAS, State law provides, in Vehicle Code Section 40203.5, that cities establish the
amount of parking penalties, fees, and surcharges; and
\ryHEREAS, State law authorizes the City to recover administrative fees, parking penalties,
fees and collection costs related to civil debt collection, late payment penalties, and other related
charges; and
WHEREAS, the parking program needs to continue to be self-sufficient for its financial
commitments; and
\ryHEREAS, since 2012, the City has been absorbing a $50.00 Disabled Linkage San Luis
Obispo County surcharge on all paid disabled parking violations out of the revenues collected.
WHEREAS, the Council considered the staff report and disabled parking fine increase at a
public meeting.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo asr follows
SECTION 1. Effective July l, 2013, parking fines shall be modified (see Exhibit A) as
follows
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Ð
Increase disabled parking violation (SLOMC Section 10.44.070) from $288 to $338;
Increase disabled parking violation (California Vehicle Code Section22507 .8 (a)) from
$288 to $338;
Increase disabled parking violation, blocking or obstructing (Califomia Vehicle Code
Section 22507 .8 (b)) from $288 to $338;
Increase disabled parking violation, on lines marked (California Vehicle Code Section
22507 .8 (cXl)) from $288 to $338;
Increase disabled parking violation, on crosshatched lines (California Vehicle Code
Section 22507.8 (cXZ)) from $288 to $338; and
Increase the disabled parking violation for offstreet areas (California Vehicle Code
Section 22511.7) from $288 to $338.
R
PH1 - 17
ATTACHMENT 2
Upon motion of seconded
on the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 12th day of June,2013
and
Mayor Jan Howell Marx
ATTEST
Maeve Kennedy Grimes
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
J. Christine Diehick
City Attorney
R
PH1 - 18
CODE & SECTION
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PENALTY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE DATE: 07/01 /201 3
DESCRIPTION
INTERFERENCE WITH POLICE/AUTHORIZED OFFICER
OBEDIENCE TO TRAFFIC CONÏROL DEVICES
UNAUTHORIZED PAINTING ON CURBS
OVERNIGHT CAMPING (1Opm - 6 am)
STOPPING OR STANDING IN PARKWAYS PROHIBITED
STOP/STAND/PARK IN VIOLATION OF CHAPTER
NO PARKING ZONE - PROHIBITED PARKING - Also TaxiZone (d)
USE OF STREETS FOR STORAGE OF VEHICLES PROHIBITED
REPAIRING OR GREASING VEHICLE ON PUBLIC STREET
WASHING OR POLISHING VEHICLES
PARKING ADJACENT TO SCHOOLS
PARKING PROHIBITED ON NARROW SÏREETS
PARKING ON GRADES
UNLAWFUL PARKING - PEDDLERS, VENDORS
EMERGENCY PARKING SIGNS
LARGE/COMMERCIAL VEH ICLE PARKING NEAR INTERSECTION
NIGHTTIME PARKING OF LARGE VEHICLES
NIGHTTIME PARKING OF VEH W/OPERAÏING AIR/REFRIGERATION
PARKING IN A RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING AREA
PERMITS - DISPLAY OF PERMITS
NO PERMIT LOT
TIMED PARKING 10 MINUTES TO 10 HOURS (Overtime Parking)
BACKING INTO PARKING SPACE PROHIBITED
PARKING PARALLEL ON ONE-WAY STREETS
DIAGONAL PARKING
PARKING SPACE MARKINGS
NO STOPPING ZONE
ALL NIGHT PARKING PROHIBITED (3-5am)
CURB MARKING TO INDICATE NO STOPPING/PARKING REGS.
EFFECT OF PERMISSION TO LOAD/UNLOAD IN YELLOW ZONE
EFFECT OF PERMISSION TO LOAD/UNLOAD IN WHITE ZONE
STANDING IN ANY ALLEY
CERTAIN VEHICLES PROHIBITED IN CENTRAL DISTRICT
ADVERTISING VEHICLES
ANIMAL DRAWN VEHICLES
TRUCK ROUTES
COMM. VEHICLES PROHIBITED FROM USING CERTAIN STREETS
MAX. GROSS WT. LIMITS OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN STREETS
PARKING METERS - OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES
UNLAWFUL TO PARK AFTER METER TIME HAS EXPIRED
UNLAWFUL TO EXTEND TIME BEYOND LIMIT
IMPROPER USE OF METER
PARKING METERS/STANDARDS - PROPER USE
MOTORCYCLE SPACES
CURRENT TAB IMPROPERLY AÏTACHED
VEHICLE OR ANIMAL ON PUBLIC GROUNDS-MOVING
VEHICLE OR ANIMAL ON PUBLIC GROUNDS-PARKING
DRIVEWAYS, PATHS, PARKING FACILIÏIES ON GROUNDS
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: FIRE LANE
EXHIBIT A
PENALTY
SLMC 10.12.050
SLMC'10.14.030
sLMC 10.14.090
SLMC 10.34.020
SLMC 10.36.020
SLMC 10.36.030
sLMC 10.36.040
sLMC 10.36.050
sLMC 10.36.070
sLMC 10.36.080
SLMC 10.36.090
SLMC 10.36.100
SLMC 10.36.110
s1MC.10.36.120
SLMC 10.36.130
SLMC 10.36.140
SLMC 10.36.150
SLMC 10.36.160
sLMC 10.36.200
sLMC 10.36.230
SLMC 10.36.235
SLMC'10.40.010
SLMC 10.40.020
SLMC 10.40.040
sLMC 10.40.050
sLMC 10.40.060
sLMC 10.40.070
sLMC 10.40.080
SLMC 10.44.020
sLMC 10.44.030
sLMC 10.44.040
SLMC 10.44.050
iSLMC 10.¿14.070
SLMC 10.48.010
sLMC 10.48.020
sLMC 10.48.030
sLMC 10.48.040
sLMC 10.48.050
sLMC 10.48.060
sLMC 10.52.040
sLMC'10.52.050
sLMC 10.52.060
SLMC 10.52.070
sLMC 10.52.080
SLMC 10.52.110
CVC 5204(a).
CVC 21113(a)
cvc 21113(b)
CVC 21 1 13 (c)
cvc 22500.1
93
58
58
100
33
33
53
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
38
28
33
38
28
21
21
33
21
38
23
53
33
33
58
33
33
88
88
88
23
33
15
15
15
15
*114
116
33
33
116
Page 1
PH1 - 19
CODE & SECTION
CVC 22500(a)
cvc 22500(b)
CVC 22500(c)
cvc 22500(d)
CVC 22500(e)
cvc 22500(f)
CVC 22500(s)
cvc 22500(h)
cvc 22500(i)
cvc 22500û)
cvc 22500(k)
cvc 22500(r)
CVC 22502(a)
cvc 22502(b)
CVC 22502(c)
CVC 22504(a)
CVC 22505(a)
cvc 22505(b)
cvc 22507
CVC 22507.8 (a)
cvc 22507.8 (b)
cvc 22507.8 (c)(1)
:CVC 22507.8 (cX2)
cvc 22510
:cvc 225'11.7
cvc 22512
cvc 22513
cvc 22514
CVC 22515(a)
cvc 22515(b)
cvc 22516
cvc 22517
cvc 22520.5
CVC 22520.5(a)
cvc 22521
cvc 22522
CYC 22523(a)
cvc 22523(b)
cvc 22650
cvc 22651 (b)
cvc 40225.
cvc 40226-
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PENALTY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE DATE: 07/01 /201 3
DESCRIPTION
STOPPI NG/STANDI NG/PARKI NG: WITH I N I NTERSECTION
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: ON A CROSSWALK
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKI NG: BETWEEN SAFETY ZONE
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: W/lN 15' FIREHOUSE ENTRANCE
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKI N G: PUBLIC/PRIVATE DRIVEWAY
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: ON SIDEWALK
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKI N G: ALONG/OPPOSITE OBSTRUCT
STOPPING/STANDINGiPARKING: ON ROADWAY SIDE OF VEHICLE
IMPROPER PARKING IN BUS ZONE
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: lN TUBE OR TUNNEL
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: UPON BRIDGE EXCEPT AUTH
IMPROPER PARKING IN WHEELCHAIR ACCESS
CURB PARKING
PARKING OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
CURB PARKING - WHEELS MORE THAN 18 INCHES FROM CURB
UNINCORPORATED AREA PARKING
PARKING ON STATE HIGHWAY WHERE SIGN POSTED
POSTED NO PARKING - SÏATE HIGHWAY
UNLAWFUL PARKING
PARKING IN SPACE FOR DISABLED
PARKING IN SPACE FOR DISABLED . OBSTRUCT/BLOCK
PARKING IN SPACE FOR DISABLED . ON LINES MARKED
PARKING IN SPACE FOR DISABLED . CROSSHATCHED LINES
PARKING IN SNOW REMOVAL AREAS
DISABLED ZONE
VEHICLE UNATÏENDED
TOW CARS - PARKING ON FREEWAY
FIRE HYDRANTS
UNATTENDED VEHICLES - SET BRAKES/STOP MOTOR
UNATTENDED VEHICLES - SET BRAKESMHEELS/PREVENT MOVE
LOCKED VEHICLE
OPENING AND CLOSING DOORS
VENDING ON FREEWAY RIGHT-OF.WAY
VENDING ON FREEWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY
ILLEGAL TO PARK ON RAILROAD TRACKS
PARKING NEAR SIDEWALK ACCESS RAMPS
VEHICLE ABANDONMENT- On Highway
VEHICLE ABANDONMENT
UNLAWFUL REMOVAL OF UNATTENDED VEHICLE
VEHICLE PARKED/LEFT STANDING TO OBSTRUCT TRAFFIC
PROCESSING OTHER VIOLATIONS
FAILURE TO DISPLAY DISABLED PLACARD - ADMINISTRAÏIVE FEE
LATE PAYMENÏ PENALTY
PENALTY
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
263
33
33
263
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
338
338
338
338
33
338
33
63
33
33
116
116
116
116
33
288
283
283
116
116
*10
"25
30
116
* Fine or fee amounts are set by the Uniform Bail & Penalty Schedule or by specific CVC section
All other fine amounts set by City Council pursuant to CVC 40203.5
P4e2
PH1 - 20
ATTACHMENT 3
RESOLUTTON NO. (2013 SERTES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING AN
INCREASE TO THE FEE FOR RESIDENTIAL TEN HOUR METER PERMITS
AND SUPERSEDING INCONSISTENT FEES IN PRIOR RESOLUTIONS
WHEREAS, the City supports the commercial core as a viable economic and cultural center
and preserve its historic character; and
WHEREAS, the City supports providing a limited number of parking spaces to accommodate
residential tenants within the Downtown-Commercial (C-D) zone consistent with the General plan
Land Use Element Policy 4.22 andHousing Element Policy 3.12.4; and
WHEREAS, residential parking spaces may be provided in structures or other locations that
are suitable for ovemight parking programs; and
WHEREAS, monthly fees for such parking spaces shall be adopted by City Council resolution
to financially contribute to the cost of the program; and
\ryHEREAS, the parking program needs to continue to be self-sufficient for its financial
commitments; and
WHEREAS, the Council considered the staff report and public comment on the increase to
residential 1O-hour meter permits and disabled parking fines at a public meeting.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. Effective July I,2013, residential lO-hour meter permits shall be increased to
$120 a year for qualified residents with 10 hour meters in front of their residences with no off-street
parking in the downtown core.
R
PH1 - 21
ATTACHMENT 3
Upon motion of seconded
on the following vote:
AYES
NOES:
ABSENT:
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 12th day of June,2013.
and
Mayor Jan Howell Marx
ATTEST
Maeve Kennedy Grimes
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
R-
PH1 - 22
Goodwin, Heather
From
Sent:
To:
Grimes, Maeve
Friday, June 07, 2013 5:16 PM
Goodwin, Heather
FW: Mark CanaanSubject:
Heather, please distribute as Agenda Correspondence for the June L2th meeting.
Thank you
m,\eve kenneÒy qprmes
City Clerk
c¡tv oÊ s.ln lurs or]rspo
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401,
phone, (8ASI781-7IO2
€mar[, mgrimes@slocitv.org
AGËNDA
CORRESPONDENCE
From: Horch, Robert
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 3:55 PM
To: Grimes, Maeve
Cc: Bochum, Tim; Grigsby, Daryl
Subject: FW: Mark Canaan
Maeve,
This email concerns the Parking Fund Review on June 12,2013. Can you pass this on to City Council,
please?
From: Mark Canaan fmailto:Mark Canaan@saes-group.com]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 It22 PM
To: Horch, Robeft
Subject: Mark Canaan
Mr. Horch
My mother is Corene Deming, she owns the home at the corner of Pismo and Santa Rosa. lf she has her off street
parking raised as much as proposed she will more than likely not pay it. This will then force her to park in her garage that
faces Santa Rosa street which is very busy. Going in and out of her garages driveway will create a very dangerous
situation for my elderly mother because of amount of cars on this dangerous corner and the speed of vehicles on this
street. Please take in consideration not only the expense for the elderly on fixed incomes but the safety of these
individuals in our community.
A concerned citizen and long time resident
Mark Canaan
JUN I O 2OI3
ÈDR
LT CLË R
1