Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/03/1961Reverend Hawkins stated that he was not asking the City Council to take action on Proposition 801, but was just asking that the Council take an official stand against discrimination in order to off -set the damage done by the realty group in furthering discrimination in housing. Councilman Miller stated that he had read Bill .801 and that he supported it and that his experience in renting property proved that discrimination does exist in the City of San Luis Obispo against certain people, and urged that the City Council consider endorsing this bill and further,that - the Council read the bill and take action on the bill at the study session Wednesday, May 3, 1961. Mayor Davidson urged the Council Committee of Shipsey and Miller to study the bill and make recommendation to the City Council. 24. J. Chshman, instructor at the Senior High School, appeared before the City Council and tlanked the Council and Department Heads for the work and time they have contributed to the students taking part in-the Youth in Government Day activities: He stated that he was sure the Council and Department Heads did not realize the great impression that was being made on the students during their day in government. He again thanked the City Council for their courtesy. On motion of Donald Q. Miller, seconded by R..L. Graves, Jr., the meeting adjourned to 7:30 P.M., Wednesday, May 3, 1961. Approved this 15th day of May, 1961. Ci2l lerk ADJOURNED CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 3, 1961 - -- 7:30 P. M. CITY HALL The City Council met in Adjourned Session with Mayor Clay P. Davidson presiding. ROLL CALL: Present - Clay P. Davidson, R. L. Graves, Jr., Miss Margaret M. McNeil, Donald Q. Miller, Gerald W. Shipsey. Absent - None CITY STAFF PRESENT: Planning & Building Director.Abraham, City Clerk Fitzpatrick, City Attorney Houser, Administrative Officer Miller, City Engineer Romero. 1. The City Council discussed the matter of adoption of rules of order for procedure of the Council meetings. The Council discussed various procedural steps that should be :reduced to writing for a guide to the City Council ' for the Council meetings. City Attorney Houser explained to the City Council what he had in mind relative to rules of order so that all the Councilmen would be aware of the procedural steps necessary to make motions,.etc. After discussion, tor. Houser offered to contact the League of California Cities, who have made several studies of this matter and do have copies of rules of order, and then he could present these.to the Council for their consideration. 1 1 1 Mr'. Houser was authorized to proceed with his suggestion and report to the City Council at the first meeting in June, 1961. 2. Councilman Graves reported on a meeting of the Council Committee appointed to study the Freeway Addition. He stated that only a short study had been made of this subject, and that he did not believe that it would be wise to stop the annexation at this point due..to the steps already taken. City-Attorney Houser explained to the City Council the reason the annexation was shaped the way it was, as the fact that the citizens working on the annexation had attempted to get all the property owners to annex but also had to keep in mind the 50% protest provision. The City Council then discussed the various aspects of the proposed annexation. Mr. Houser then explained the steps necessary to proceed with the annexation. He explained the provision of the Ordinance necessary to call the election, etc. ORDINANCE NO. 189 (1961 Series), "An Ordinance of the City of San Luis Obispo Calling A Special Election to be Held on the 29th Day of June, 1961, Pertaining to the Annexation of 'Freeway Addition' to the City of San Luis Obispo," was passed and adopted on motion of Donald.Q. Miller, seconded by Gerald W. Shipsey, on the following roll call vote: AYES: Clay P. Davidson, R. L. Graves, Jr., Miss Margaret M. McNeil, Donald Q. Miller, Gerald W. Shipsey. NOES: None ABSENT: None 3. The following communication from Mayor Davidson on the sewer plant enlargement was presented: "At this time I would like to introduce to you one of the critical decisions which we as a Council must make. I have been studying the composition of San Luis Obispo as a City. At this time it is my belief we have a well balanced community economically, We have three State agencies, a start in Industry along with a good retail district ... all of these contributing to the balance of the community. We are now on a plateau of decision and must make the correct choice of action. With our present arrangement we are fast becoming a bedroom City. As the State agencies expand they bring people to our community who are of high caliber, but the taxes on.homes do not return ehough income to proportionately support community services required. The-State construction such as we have, again gives no return taxeise. We are then fast approaching a time when either our tax rate must be raised very high or a new source of income acquired. I believe this source should be Industry. Let's review the facts. We have a good water supply. We have a deficient sewer plant and are in the process of planning an enlargement. Under present plans we will enlarge this plant to accommodate 40,000 people. Should we proceed with this plan we would have to adquire additional lands for ponding effluent from the sewage plant, namely 19 acres. We now have approximately 50 acres being used in.this manner. These 19 acres will represent an investment of approximately $47,500 in prime land which is adjoining the freeway. Tie would end up with around $800,000 cost of enlargment and still be able to serve only 40,000 people. Should we successfully attract industry to San-Luis Obispo, which in my estimation we must do, we could very well get this enlargement . accomplished just.before it would again be overloaded. There is one more item to be considered. As this City grown in the south - easterly direction it will be necessary to install a trunk line down Tank Farm Road. This line represents about $250,000 in cost. We then have this proposal to consider. Should we at this time enlarge the sewer plant, construct an outfall line to the Coast and install the trunk line down Tank Farm Road? The estimated cost of such a project is $1,960,000. What are the advantages of undertaking such a plan? First the City would then be in a position to service approximately 60,000 people along with a reasonable amount of industry. In other words, this action will put the City in a position -to accommodate industry at once. We would. be in a position to retire a portion of the cost by utilizing a portion of the Yoakum Tract assessment. There is also a possibility of developing an annexation near the Country Club which could contribute towards the ' cost of the trunk line. We would also have nearly 50 acres of prime land available for sale which should be worth approximately $125,000. This land, after returned to private use and improvements,.could also be returned to the tax rolls, returning an income of at least $4,000 per year. With this type of plan the total cost could very well be $1,800,000. Should you agree this is a good and necessary plan, the next question is how can this be paid for? I would like to digress for a moment. As you all know, last Sunday we were visited by a. contingent from Oxnard including the Mayor who' is also named Davidson, and several Councilmen. I had the pleasure of talking to Mayor Davidson of Oxnard for approximately 30 minutes. In his conversation he mentioned that Oxnard how has a.population of approxirm tely 45,000 people and-is growing at the rate of approximately 4,000 per year. In the past seven years he has been on the Council, the City of Oxnard has doubled in size. They have "growing" problems too. He also mentioned they voted a sewer redemption bond, I believe two years ago, and are very satisfied with the results except they didn't go far enough and are now taking in a subdivision without being able to serve them with sewer. This is the type of problem-we are now considering. I believe it would be extremely beneficial to this Council, the Administrative Officer, ' City Engineer, and the City Attorney, to make a one day trip to Oxnard to study their development and planning over the past ten years. At that time we could study their experiences with revenue bonds, their benefits and disadvantages. This could lead to financing of our program of sewer.system development by revenue bonds. I believe you are all familiar with the report .submitted by Mr. Jenks. His report suggests three courses of action and recommends the first proposal. Since this was approved by the former Council, no doubt there should be some discussion regarding Mr. Jenks' recommendation as well as action on my proposal. Should the Council desire to make the trip to Oxnard, it will be necessary to contact Mayor Davidson of Oxnard to set up a date. At this time is there any discussion regarding the aforementioned proposal ?" Councilman Miller congratulated Mayor Davidson on a fine analysis of the City's sewage situation. The City Council and staff then discussed the Mayor's proposal.. Administrative Officer Miller briefed the Council on progress to date ' on expansion of the sewer plant: 1. Application for government grant. 2. Retention of Stone and Youngberg.as•financial consultants.. 3. Retention of Harry Jenks as design engineer. Mr. Miller further explained that Mr. Jenks' proposal was to phase in the various steps of the sewer plant enlargmment with final development i. at some future date. T 1 1 City- Engineer•Romero then presented not only the.three proposals of Mr. Jenks, but also suggested•.that the Council should keep in-mind the. following major items of sewer improvement, and explained that these figures represented a horseback estimate to give some idea of magnitude: 1. Sewer line Tank Farm Road, estimated $350,.000 plus. 2. Extension of Yoakum sewer, $40,000. 3. The final stage of the main City sewer line south on Higuera Street from Portuguese Flat Road to the sewer plant, $75,000. 15% should be added to all_of the above for overhead costs. Mr. Romero also urged that a consultant be retained to begin a study of sewage development in the southeast area of the City for future expansion. Administrative Officer Miller discussed with the City Council the use of-consultants in general, and also explained work done in the past by Mr. Adamson on the sewer and water master plan, who is the engineer Mr. Romero would like to see make the southeasterly study of the sewer development. The City Council then discussed various aspects of Mayor Davidson's proposal regarding complete improvement and expansion of the sewer plant. Administrative Officer Miller suggested that the City Council authorize I1r. Jenks and Stone and Youngberg to get together to study the Mayor's proposal and then appear before the Council with the results of their study. Mr. Miller also explained the cost to the City of the contract with Stone and Youngberg and Harry Jenks. Administrative Officer Miller was instructed to proceed with his suggestion to contact the consultants to study the proposal and to appear before the City Council with their recommendations. 4. Mayor Davidson presented each member of the City Council with a study prepared by the One- Hundred Percenters Club of the City of Fresno, a merchant group for the revitalization of the downtown business district of the City of Fresno, which had been allowed to deteriorate by the expansion of shopping centers to outlying districts. 5. On motion of Gerald W. Shipsey, seconded by R. L. Graves, Jr., City Clerk Fitzpatrick was authorized to•call•for bids for demolition of buildings in Lot D of the Parking District(Monterey- Higuera- Court -Osos Streets), bids to be opened at 3:00 P.M., June 5, 1961. 6. Planning Director Abraham, at the request of Councilman Miller, explained to the City Council the problem incurred in inspection of buildings • within the City when the City does not have an adequate housing code. He also explained how this problem is aggravated by the overabundance of property zoned R -3 in the City. 7. Councilman Shipsey asked the City Council whether they should proceed with a farewell party for the retiring Mayor and Council as has been done in the past. The Council agreed that this was a; nice gesture and Administrative Officer Miller and City Clerk Fitzpatrick were appointed as a committee to make the necessary arrangements._ 8. City Attorney Houser reported to the City Council regarding negotiations to date for exchange of property between the City of San Luis Obispo and the Division of Highways at the sewer farm. Mr. Houser explained the agreement section by section to the Council as to what would be acquired by the City and what would be acquired by the State. Mr. Houser said the.Council Committee and Staff.were agreed that with the safeguards set up in the agreement the City would be protected against any excessive costs. Mr. Houser then presented a Resolution to.the City Council authorizing the Mayor to sign the agreement on behalf of the City. s