HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/15/1962On a motion of Councilman Shipsey, seconded by Councilman Miller, the
Tartaglia lease of the Gudel property be on a month to month basis to
December 31, 1962.
On motion of Councilman Shipsey, seconded by Councilman Miller, the meeting was
adjourned at 11:20 P.M.
Approved this S7,i/ day o _ , 1962.
City Cl
REGULAR MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL
October 15, 1962 - 7:30 P.M...
City Hall
ILLI,, Invocation was given by Mayor Davidson
Roll Call - Present: Miss Margaret McNeil, R. L. Graves, Jr., Donald Q..Mil.ler,-
Gerald W. Shipsey, Clay P:.Davidson
City Staff Present: J. W. Abraham, Building & Planning-Director; J. H.
Fitzpatrick, City Clerk; R. D. Miller, Administrative
Officer; D. F. Romero,. City Engineer; William Schofield,
Police Chief; E. P. Thompson, Water.Superintendent;.Lee
M. Schlobohm, Fire Chief; William M. Houser, Jr, City
Attorney; William E. Flory, Park & Recreation Superintendent.
Minutes of the meeting of October 1, 1962 were approved on motion of Councilman
Miller, seconded by Councilman.Shipsey.
Claims against the dity for the month of October, 1962 were approved on motion ,
of Councilman Shipsey, seconded.by Councilman Miller.
1. Mr. Richard Miller, Administrative Officer, announced the appointment of
Tamy L.. Mitchell as Stenographer in the Department of Finance, effective
October 3, 1962 at $312 per month.
2. On motion of Councilman Miller; seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, the follow-
ing salary increases were approved effective November 1, 1962:
CAMERON, Bonnie J., Stenographer, From Step 1 at $312 to Step 2 at.$330 per
month.
DWSEY, Patrick J., Fire Captain, from Step.4 at $575 to Step 5 at $608
per month.
GINGG, Thomas P., Civil Engineering Assistant, from Step 2 at $515.to Step
3 at $545 per month.
HILEMAN, Helen B. Senior Librarian, from Step 1 at $412-to Step 2 at.$435
per month:
KAYE, Donald J., Fireman, from Step 3 at $460 to Step 4 at.$488 per month.
SKILES._Frank E:, Building Inspector, from Step 3 at.$608.to Step 4, at
$645 per month.
STEPHENS, Wanda J., Parking Enforcement Officer (Female), ".from Step 1 at
$330 to Step 2 at $350 per month.
3. Progress report for the weeks.ending'October.6 and 13, 1962, on-the sewage
plant enlargement were ordered received and filed.
4. A proposal from the U. S. Department of Interior Geological Survey for measur-
ing waters at Old Creek and Cottontail Creek were presented to the City Council.
Mr. Houser, City Attorney, explained that the proposal'wa6 to measure the inflow
of water to the Whale Rock Dam so that accurate measuring could be maintained
throughout the .year. Mr. Houser stated that he and Mr.'Thompson had.discussed
this proposal and felt..that this information was -not needed for operations of
the dam and did not believe that-the expense was jiistified and recommended that
the City not accept the proposal.
On motion of Mayor Davidson, seconded by Councilman Shipsey, that the City Council
accept the recommendation of the City Attorney,
S. On motion'.of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Shipsey, the following
Resolution was introduced:
RESOLUTION NO. 1012 (1962 Series) "A Resolution increasing the n62 -63 Budget."
(Account No. 343, Water - Transmission and Distribution Mains)
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Miss. Margaret McNeil, R. L. Graves,•Jr.,`Donald Q. Miller,
Gerald W. Shipsey, Clay P. Davidson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None _ ...:
6. On motion -of Councilman-Shiysev, seconded by..Councilman.Miller, the following
Resolution was introduced:
RESOLUTION NO. 1013 (1962 Series) "A-,Resolution transferring monies to the Whale
Rock Dam Fund on.a, loan basis." .
Passed and adopted on the following roll call voter
AYES: Miss Margaret McNeil, R. L. Graves, Jr., Donald Q: Miller,
Gerald W. Shipsey, Clay P. Davidson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
7. .'On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by- Councilman.Graves..and upon recommendatic
of the City Engineer, the following contract payments were ordered paid:
VALLEY PAVING Higuera paving • Est. #1 $62-738.04
Est. #2 (final) 748.67
SMEE'S PLUMBING Madonna-Road sewer
line relocation (final)
Est. #3 274.76
(Item 2 to be paid when funds are received from the State)
R. Mr.. William Washburn, 1541 Slack Street, appeared before the Council questioning the
matter of '.Cal Poly students- preparing -a bonfire in the field adjacent to Slack St.,
which he believes would be a danger to the residents of the area•and urged that the
City Council take some action for the property owners.
Fire Chief Schlobobm stated that he had looked into this matter and had consulted
with the Fire Chief at Cal Poly and that he believes there would be no hazard. Also,
the - students.had moved the bonfire further into,Cal Poly property_which.would lessen
' the problem and would, with the Council's approval, station a fire truck in the
vicinity, during the actual burning in case - any -problem developed.
8. At.this time-the-City Council- 'considered the recommendation -of -the Construction
Board.of Appeals for adoption by,the City of the 1961'Piumbing Code and appendices.
Jean Abraham, Building and Planning Director, and- the'City Council discussed the
- recommendation of .the Construction'Board of•Appeals regarding the 1%1 edition of
the Uniform Plumbing Code and various amendments and conditions of the code with
particular reference to a section of the code dealing with qualifications of
plumbers and who could and who could not do plumbing under this code.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Shipsey, following Ordinance
was introduced and passed to print.
ORDINANCE NO. 231 (1962.Series) "An Ordinance adopting the Uniform Plumb -
ing-Code. 1961 Edition, and. Appendices A, B, C, D.and W'
Y. Councilman.Miller requested that the City-Council instruct.the Administrative
Officer to make an investigation of the activities of.the.Building Department
and to"see if some procedure.could not be set up to give better service to
the public, particularly in the length.of time involved in plan checking and
also to see if additional help is needed to serve the public.
Mayor Davidson requested•ihat -Mr. Abraham prepare a report on the length of
time required to process plan checks so the Council can see for themselves
the time involved. By common consent of the Council, the Administrative 1
Officer vas requested to investigate and report to the City Council on the
activities of the Building Department.
Z. Councilman Miller requested a report.from'ihe City Engineer.on the work being
done by the contractor on the Yoakum District, particularly on the backfilling.
Mr. Romero, City Engineer, stated that the contractor is not doing a good job
and he it not happy,with.the contractor,-particularly in the way that he is
proceeding with the backfilling operation. Further, he stated that he was
ordering compaction tests on the backfill to see that they are adequate.
9. On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman MiUc, the following
Ordinance was introduced for final passage:
ORDINANCE N0. 239 (1962 Series) "An Ordinance amending the Fire Zone Map on
property fronting Montalbin Street."
Finally passed on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Miss Margaret McNeil, R. L. Graves, Jr., Donald Q. Miller,
Gerald W. Shipsey, Clay P..Davidson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
10. On motion'of Councilman Shipsey, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, the follow -
ing Ordinance was finally passed:
ORDINANCE NO. 241 (1962 Series) "An Ordinance leasing a portion of Laguna
.Lake property Co Ernest Dalidio.':'
Finally passed on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Miss Margaret McNeil, R. L. Graves, Jr., Donald Q. Miller,
Gerald W. Shipsey, Clay P. Davidson
NOES: None
ABSENT:' None.
11. At this time the City Council.held a public hearing -on Resolution:No« 1001,
a Resolution of intention to abandon.portions:of Wilson Street and Champlin
Avenue. t,
Mayor Davidson declared the public hearing open on the intention to abandon
portions of these streets...
Mayor Davidson asked how the City Council could require the installation of
curbs; gutters and sidewalks along Lot 1,.Block 1,, and-Lot 16,.Block 11, of the
Phillip's addition as a condition of abandonment.
City Attorney.Houser.stated that he recommended that.'the City.Counci:l.defer.
final action on.the abandonment of these streets until an agreement is-reached
with the property owners that they would install curbs, gutters and sidewalks
on property adjacent to the. streets being abandoned.. The City Council_ 'discussed
ways and means of requiring curbs, gutters,and sidewalks to.be placed along
Wilson and Grove Streets.
October 15, 1962
Councilman Graves.'stated that-he did not.believe,it would be fair to require in-
.stallation of improvements by the property owners along Wilson Street as they
would.-receive little if any benefit', but that he would recommend curb, gutter and
sidewalk installatioaalong Grove Street,-along Lot 1, Block 1.
Mr. Ted Maino stated that he was willing and was planning on placing curbs, gutters
-'and sidewalks along Grove Street adjacent to Lot I.-Block 1 and on that portion of
Wilson Street being abandoned. He questioned the need for the 20 foot easement for
water lines as he believes that a 10 foot easement would.be adequate.. He also
suggested that the City Council not require curbs, gutters and sidewalks in front
- of property on Lot 16,-Block 11 as he did not believe that these property owners
would receive any.benefit from the abandonment.
Price Thompson, Water Superintendent, stated that he needed a 20 foot easement for the
water line -in case -of.necessity to repair or replace portions of the -line.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Shipsey, that Wilson and
Champlin be abandoned .on. condition that a covenant be-.filed with the.City
guaranteeing the installation of!.curbs, gutters and sidewalks along Grove Street
and be. completed. in :twelve (12). months. .
Motion carried..
12. At this time the.City Council.held.a•.public hearing on Resolution No. 1000, a
Resolution of intention .to.abandon.a.portion.of Palm Street.
Mayor Davidson declared the public hearing open.
The.City Clerk, read a letter from.Pacific.Gas.& Electric. Company-requesting their
poles,: etc.; to.be.protected if-the City abandons any portion of the street.
William Houser, City Attorney, presented the following opinion on the abandonment
of Palm Street:
"The Conditions which the Planning Commission recommended and the City Council
' concurred at their September 17, 1962 meeting are as follows:
L That there.be an exchange.of.land considered so.that this City may ac-
quire that portion of private property necessary for the .widening of Monterey
Street in the location of the Ranchotel.
2. That the City reserve the.right•to determine the ingress and egress to the
Ranchotel property with regard to both Grand Avenue and Monterey Street.
3. That all utilities lying within the abandoned area, as well as the curb,
gutter and sidewalks, be moved.-to the satisfaction of the utility.company of the
City at the expense of the developer of the property.
PROBLEMS
"On Item #1, the problem is: for what length of time should the property owner be
entitled to retain the use of the property .being conveyed.to the City•inasmuch as I
understand that part of the restaurant-structure-is located on the parcel to be
conveyed to the City.. Suggestion:- Have:the owner execute a deed to the City, to-
gether with'a covenant running with the land, providing that the improvements would
be removed by the owner within period'.of time OR, as.•an alternate, improvement:
will be removed by the owner within 120 days after written notice from the City and
not to exceed three (3) .years, and if the owner should fail •to.do_so, the City may
remove and'.make the cost.-thereof a lien on the property.•
' "Item 2 would be resolved at the time of the relocation of the curb, gutter and
sidewalks.
"The problem with Item #3 is the time limit.within which to relocate the utilities
and the 'curb, gutter.and. sidewalks:
. "There are-two methods of handling these problems.: The first would be that the
Council declare the.abandoament of this portion of Palm Street subject to compliance
with items 1, 2 and 3. The problem would be the enforcement of these conditions if
the property owner failed to perform. ..
J
"As an alternate, the Council could informally determine that they-are
willing to abandon upon execution of a deed and covenant to comply with
Item 1 and completion of the relocation of the utilities and improvements
required in Item 3 and on that basis, continue the hearing to a future
date certain when the work has been completed.
"The Second alternative would provide more .protection-for . the City inas-
much as there would be noquestion of street abandonment until the work
has been completed."
John Sargant objected to the abandonment of Palm Street as he-,believes that
the parking areas that would be abandoned will be needed for use of-the
patrons of the Veteran 's Building.
David Romero, City Engineer; stated that no parking places would be lost as
the parking would still be allowed along the curb at the new street line.
Frank Funk appeared.before the City Council objecting to the abandonment of
any portion of Palm Street as he believes that the City.some. day would need
Palm Street to complete a one -way street couplet with Monterey Street and
further stated that once this street is abandoned and closed it would be im-
possible to get it back by the City if it were needed for street purposes.
C1611 Whelchel, Planning Commissioner, stated that he.was one.of.:the members
of the Commission who opposed the abandonment of Palm Street when•.it was be-
fore the City Planning Commission.
John Badgley, architect, appeared before the City Council on behalf of the
property owner, William 0. Hall, requesting abandonment of Palm.Street in
front of the Ranchotel property. He listed the following factors.for the
Council's consideration:
1. Street traffic pattern will be clarified and greater safety will
result by the simplification of a now poorly defined major City
intersection.
2. Taxable City property will be increased and enhanced by the addition a
of property - improvement to serve a recognizable need for commercial
hotel facilities.
3. The above property will be used for landscaping hotel appearance and
additional off -site parking.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Shipsev, it is the in-
tention of the City Council to abandon this portion of -Palm Street subject
to conditions 1, 2 and 3 of.the City Attorney's opinion.
Motion carried.
Public hearing continued to January 21, 1963 at 8:30 P.M.
13. At this time the City Council - held a public hearing on-the recommendation of
the Planning Commission to amend the Municipal Code by adding provisions for
regulations governing Planned Development Districts..
The Mayor declared the public hearing open.
City -Clerk Fitzpatrick reported to.the City Council that since the last meet-
ing, he had mailed a copy of the proposed Ordinance to all-subdividers and
financial institutions in the City.
Morgan Flagg appeared before the City Council and stated that.he agreed with
the purpose of the proposed City Ordinance as presented to the City Council by
the Planning Commission. He further stated that he had seen this.type of Ordi-
nance used in other communities to good purpose;.but he stated that he objected
to Section 9200.18.3(1), which grants the - authority to the Planning Commission
or City Council-to zone specific properties to PD classification which is un-
fair to the property owners as it would require them to comply with the pro-
visions of the Code and.present an application for PD with-supporting data
prior to the time the property might be ready for development.
October 15, 1962
William Houser, City Attorney,,explained that.if. the Planning - Commission or City
Council desired, they could rezone any property to Planned .Development and in so
doing, would'require the"properiy owner to comply.with the provisions regarding
the application. Mr. Houser also explained.that this does not change the present
procedure as the Planning Commission or City Council can, by holding the necessary
hearing, rezone any property in the City. The new procedure proposed would allow
the property owner the opportunity.to appear before the Planning, Commission and
Council with supporting information.for or, against the.Planned Development Classi-
fication.
Councilman Miller stated that he did not object'to,_the basic,idea of PD zoning, by
which a' property owner could. request this.zone,.but he did object to the provision
which granted the authority to the Planning C' #ssion and City Council to zone
private property and then require the property owner to justify or object to this
classification.
Councilman Graves stated that he believed the property owner should be required to
substantiate a request for PD zone, if he had requested it, but he did not agree
that if'this cladsification was placed on the property by the City Council or
Planning Commission, the property owner should be required to submit supporting
data.
Mayor Davidson stated that he understood this prop osed.Ordinance to be a permissive
one which would allow developers to take advantage of.new techniques and proposals
to make better use of their land.
Ted Maino objected to Section 9200.18.4 (B) which limie i property owner to six
(6) months time to submit plans for development after classification by the City
Council or Planning Commission and if not accomplished.:by the .owner within that
time the City Council or'Planning Commission could rezone the property for a higher
use. -He stated that this was an unfair position as no one'in their right mind would
buy a,parcel of land for future, development with thi.possibility that if he does not
comply in six (6Y months, the zone could,be. changed to some higher classification.
William Houser, City Attorney, again explained the difference in_t he new proposal
for Planned Development District and the present method of rezoning property under
' the Municipal Code,
Morzan Flagg stated that instead of making property development more difficult, the
City should.be making laws that would make property`development more flexible and
more up -to -date to take advantage of current - trends:
Councilman Miller stated that he.objected to the portion of the PlannedDevelopment
Ordinance which allowed the Planning Commission and City Council to•iaitiate planned
development classifications, which gives the City one more way to rezone property
and was unfair to.property'owners.
Councilman Shinsey stated that he agreed with Councilman Miller and objected to
allowing the Planning Commission or City Council to initiate Planned Development
Classifications on property and only allow the..owner six (6) months to comply with
the zoning.
Clell Whelchel,- Planning Commissioner, explained'to the Council the advantage in
adopting the Planned Development Ordinance which, he believed, was an advantage to
developers of land is the City.
Hobert Sears, Vice - President of Central Savings, asked the Council to eliminate
Section 9200.18.4(b) from the Ordinance,if it is to be adopted.
Mayor Davidson stated that he could see where this Ordinance was good and useful but
' agreed that mandatory provisions should be eliminated.
E. Arnett, realtor, asked for clarification and interpretation of Section 9200.18.3
(Al) .
William Houser, City Attorney, explained the provisions of this section.to Mr.
Arnett.'
Mr. Broadbent, realtoi,'stated that he believed that the voluntary provisions of this
Ordinance were good but that all mandatory provisions based on rezoning by the City
Council and Planning Commission should be eliminated.
Carlos Moerman objected to the word "design" in Section'9200.18.10(10) as
he does not believe that the Planning Commission or the City Council should get into
the field of aesthetics and suggested that the same wording as used in
Section 9200.18.7(6) be used.
Jean Abraham, Planning and Building Director, stated as follows: 'If Section
9200.18.4 were amended, it would serve no particular purpose and should be
completely removed to eliminate confusion.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Shipsey, that the
Ordinance be referred to the City Attorney for a re -draft deletiiig'Sections
9200.18:41, 9200.18.3(A1)-and any other provisions which would allow the
Planning Commission and /or City Council to initiate PD zoning.
Motion carried. Ordinance to be considered by the City Council at the
November 5, 1962 meeting.
14. Price Thompson, Water Superintendent, brought to the City Council's attention
the matter of the Santa Margarita permit which allows the City to.put the
water to beneficial use and that the'City Council, at this time, should apply
for extension of time to perfect their permit or to apply for theii license
at this time. Mr. Thompson recommended that the City apply for an additional
length of time for one (1) year on a temporary permit'before applying for a
permanent license. '
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Miller, Mr..Thompson
was authorized to prepare application for one (1) year extension.
15. Mr. Thompson, Water Superintendent, reported to the City Council that he still
does not have the figures in final form of the request of Cal Poly to serve
Whale Rock water to the college and asked Council's permission, for additional
time to type up the report and mail it to the City Council as soon as it is
ready, for their consideration.
16. Communication from the Coachman Motel, 1001 Olive Street, protesting the
granting of an individual sign directing traffic to the Homestead'Motel (refer
to Traffic Committee Report 62- 10 -8C).
17. Traffic Committee Report of October 4, 1962.
62- 10 -6C. In regard to the petition from several residents and property owners
in the vicinity of Pacific Street lying between Osos and Santa Rosa Streets,
the Traffic Committee feels that a two -hour time limit from 9:00 A.M. to 6:00
P.M. would not be out of line if this is the wish of'those living and /or work-
ing in the area and so recommends. It is felt, however, that the all night
parking prohibition is unnecessary at this time, and "it is recommended that
the signs contain no restriction during the evening hours.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman ShipseL the following
Resolution was introduced:
RESOLUTION NO. 1018 (1962 Series) "A Resolution establishing a two -hour parking
street on a portion of Pacific Street."
Passed and adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Miss Margaret McNeil, R. L. Graves, Jr., Donald Q. Miller,
Gerald W. Shipsey, Clay P. Davidson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
62- 10 =7C. In regard to the Council's request that we contact the Ritz Motel,
we did discuss the matter in some detail with the representative who appeared
at the Council meeting last Monday evening: We suggested one or two physical
improvements, but the manager objected because he did not feel the owners
would be agreeable to the expense. We said that, if he wishes to erect a sign
on his property discouraging turn around movements within his property, he
could make application to the Planning Commission. We indicated that since
his property was open for business to the general public, we could not cite
October 15, 1962
1
1
motorists•who` used the property fora turn around. Other methods'-of solving his
problem were left with the suggestion -that-he have•thel safety engineers from his
insurance company contact our engineers and attempt to work our recommendations
for improvement. On the problem of motorists entering the freeway in a north
bound direction on Monterey, the City Engineer was asked to contact the Division
of Highways to see if they would erect a larger sign indicating the entrance to
the 101 freeway. Report was accepted by the City Council.
62- 10 -8C. The.Traffic Committee'met with the manager of the Homestead Motel who
appeared at the.Council meeting last Monday to discuss the requested motel direction
al sign with her. At first, it was suggested that a motel sign-be erected with
arrows pointing both left and right off Osos Street, but this idea was rejected
when the Police Chief suggested that this might encourage cars to make's left hand
turn onto the freeway throwing them into direct conflict with cars leaving the free-
way via-this off -ramp. The recommendation of the Traffic Committee continues to be
against erecting a directional sign for an individual motel, but it is recommended
that a street name sign be placed for Fig Street which may indicate the frontage
road to motorists driving south on Osos Street. The City Engineer is also taking
steps to-repaint the stop markings on the pavement and to slerilize the'strip be-
tween Fig Street and the freeway right of way to prevent weeds.
Report was accepted by the City - Council.
62- 10 -9T. At the request of the property owner at 1670-Phillips•Lane, we have
looked at the parking conditions in his neighborhood. He has a problem when cars
are parked too close to his driveway ramp, in which case he has difficulty negotiat-
ing a turn when backing out of his driveway because of the cars parking directly
across the street in front of a college fraternity house. It is felt that this
situation would be .remedied by authorizing, a-red -zone 'for approximately one car
space between the driveway ramps for 1670 and 1690 Phillips'Lane,-on`the north
side of Phillips.
On motion of Councilman.Shipsey, seconded -by'COuncilman Graves; the following Reso-
lution was introduced: _
' RESOLUTION NO 1019.(1962 Series) "A-Resolution- establishing a No Parking Zone on
$hillips Lane."
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Miss Margaret.McNeil, R. L. Graves, Jr., Donald Q. Miller,
Gerald W. Shipsey, Clay P. Davidson
NOES: None
ABSENT'- None
18. Communication from General Service Administration, signifying their intention of
continuing to lease space at the Recreation Building, 864.Santa•Rosa Street.
On motion,of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Miller, the General Service
Administration was requested to .forward the.:lease for Council's consideration.,
14. Report on the Planning Commission on annexation fees was held over by the City ..
Council for:further study and when the study session was set, City Clerk is to..
notify all developers.
20. The recommendation of the Planning Commission - recommending -abandonment of a portion
of Sierra Way and exchange of property for a portion of Sierra Way was accepted by
' the City Council.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Shibsey,the following Reso-
lution was introduced:
RESOLUTION NO. 1017:(1962 Series). "A.Resolution of intention to abandon a portion
of Sierra Way."
Passed and adopted on the following roll call, vote:
AYES: Miss Margaret McNeil, R. L. Graves, Jr., Donald Q. Miller,
Gerald W. Shipsey, Clay P. Davidson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
21. A Recommendation from the City Planning Commission for rezoning a portion
of Tract No. 166 and the Young- Nielsen'addition, from "U," Unclassified
Zone to "R -1," Single Family Residential Zone, was accepted by the City
Council.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Graves, the following
Ordinance was introduced:
ORDINANCE NO. 242 (1962 Series) "An Ordinance rezoning a portion of Tract
166 and the Young - Nielsen Addition."
Introduced and passed to print on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Miss Margaret McNeil, R. L. Graves, Jr., Donald Q. Miller,
Gerald W. Shipsey, Clay P. Davidson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
22. A Recommendation of the Planning Commission to rezone the Lakewood Addition
from U, Unclassified to "R -1," Single Family Residential was considered by
the City Council.
Morgan Flagg, developer, appeared before the CityCouncil regarding the re-
zoning of the Lakewood Addition and requested that the City Council consider
the possibility of rezoning a five (5) acre parcel on the southwest corner
of the property adjacent to Laguna School site, to a higher density zone and
asked that the City Council.keep this request in mind if in the future he
finds such a need for this development and that he would agree with the "R -1"
zone until that time.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, that zoning
be set for public hearing on November 5, 1962.
AYES: Donald Q. Miller, Miss Margaret McNeil
NOES: R. L. Graves, Jr., Gerald W. Shipsey, Clay P. Davidson
ABSENT: None
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Shipsey, the following
Ordinance was introduced:
ORDINANCE NO. 243 (1962 Series) "An Ordinance rezoing Lakewood Addition from
"U," Unclassified to R -19 Single Family Residential Land Use District."
Introduced and passed to print on the following roll-call-vote: ..
AYES: Miss Margaret McNeil, R. L. Graves, Jr.; Gerald W. Shipsey,
Clay P. Davidson
NOES: Donald Q. Miller
ABSENT: None
23. Copy of communication from the President of Cal Poly to the Chancellor of State
Colleges, regarding participation of the State in the_ sewage treatment plant
was ordered received and filed.
24. Minutes of a meeting between the Recreation Committee of the City of San Luis
Obispo and the San Luis Obispo Schools, held October 3, 1962, was ordered held
over to a joint meeting of the Park and Recreation Committee on October 17,
1962.
October 15, 1962
1
1
1
1
25. On motion of Councilman Shipsey, seconded by Councilman Graves, the Mayor was
authorized to accept and record a grant deed from Henson for street widening on
Foothill Boulevard.
26. Richard Miller, Administrative Officer, announced an Industrial Development Meeting
being held in Los Angeles, California, on October 25 -26, 1962.
27. Richard Miller, Administrative Officer, announced that he had been invited to attend
an Urban.Agricultural Meeting as a City representative and asked the Council's
authority to attend if arrangements can be made.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Shipsey, Mr. Miller was
authorized -to attend the meeting if he so dAsired.
28. David Romero, City Engineer, brought the following problem for Council's considerati,
on the Madonna sewer lift station:
Mr. Romero explained that several years ago the City.had accepted the Madonna Lift
Station for maintenance, and with the continued development of themotel units and
the Madonna Inn, the lift station had become totally inadequate, resulting in ex-
cessive maintenance costs. He also pointed out.that on- .several occasions when the
lift pumps had failed the Madonna Inn basement has been flooded with sewage.
In attempting to provide a temporary correction to the problem, Mr. Romero had
planned to install the Bullock Lift Station pumps and spend $500.00 which was in !!:.,;
cluded in the 1962 -63 budget. However, this would not provide a long -range solut'�CY1.
Mr. Madonna had phoned stating that he wished to correct the situation and would
a Council determination as to the degree of participation he might expect from thy=.'
City in enlarging the sewer lift station.
Mr. Romero pointed out the various alternatives and complications of a revision of
the present station, construction of an intermediate built -up station, or instal-
lation of a package station which would serve all future needs of the Madonna Inn.
Councilman Miller suggested, that the City participate to the extent of placing the
Bullock pumps in this station and cooperate with Madonna up.to $500-.00 budgeted.
City Engineer was instructed to proceed on the basis approved at budget time.
29. Estimate of funds for progress payments during the construction period on a month to
month basis for the sewage work enlargement was presented to the City Council by the
project representative.
30. Notice from the Senate Fact Finding Committee on public.health and safety announcing
that a hearing will be held on November 13 -14, 1962, in Los Angeles, California, a
continuance of the hearing on recreational use of domestic water supplies.
------ -- -- ---- ---- --- -------- - - -- --
On motion of Councilman Shipsey, seconded by Councilman Graves, meeting was adjourned at
12:45 P.M., until next Wednesday, October 17, 1962 at 7:30 Y.M.
Approved this 5th day of November, 1962.
City Cle c.