HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/06/1966REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
September 6, 1966 - 7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL
Roll Call: -'
Present:- Em@oas Blake, Frank Gallagher, .Art hur F. Spring,
Donald Q. Miller, °Clell W. Whelchel -
' City Staff
Present:, J. H. Fitzpatrick,. City Clerk; R.,D. Miller, Administrative
Officer; Battalion Chief M. F. Dixon, Fire. Department.;_.. ..__.
Ervin L. Rodgers, Police Chief; D. F. Rcmero, City Engineer.
On motion of Councilmaa.Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Spring,.the- minutes -of the
meeting of August 15, 1966 were approved. Motion carried.
On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, claims against the
City for the month of September 1966 were approved subject to the approval.of the_
Administrative Officer, Motion carried.
1. Communication from the Economic Development Committee of the San Luis Obispo. ..
Chamber of Commerce regarding-the entrance of the State of California into the field
of metal office furniture manufacturing was continued to October 3, 1966 on motion
of Councilman" Gallaaher,.seconded by Councilman Blake. Motion carried.
2. At this time the City Council considered a communication from John L. Seitz
complaining about .noises and commotion to adjacent properties by patrons of.the_.
Pizza Pantry located at 684 Marsh Street.
Also a communication from W. R,'Predman, representing Mr. Collins of the Pizza Pantry
' Pantry, stating that he is running the business to the best interest of all concerned.
and that his client cat not be responsible for nuisances caused outside the premises.
Communication from B. S. Crossmaa, Acting City Attorney', to the"City Council stating
if the City Council feels that the existing operation is in violation,.then the City
Council may revoke its order issuing the license for such business if-and when the
Council determined they had jurisdiction:
Mr. Crossman continued that he also felt that many of the offenses alleged to take
place in the vicinity of the Pizza Pantry may be more of a private violation than
a public violation and if so, the injured property owners have the right of civil
suit, and under no condition can the City Council revoke a business license without
first holding a public hearing.
A petition signed by 31 residents and property owners in the vicinity..of the Pizza
Pantry requesting that the City Council take some action to force the operator of
the business to control the nuisance being committed by these people.
M. William Fredman, attorney representing the Pizza Pantry, appeared before the .
City Council stating that he- agreed with'the City Attorneys interpretation that the
City Council could only consider this matter at a public bearing but.he felt that
they had no jurisdiction in this matter as the license was issued by their order.
Further, he stated.that he felt that this was .a private matter and that he and his
client stood ready at any time to discuss this matter with the property owners and
to go to civil court and settle any complaints.
Mr. Fredman continued that his client, Mr. Collins., wished to cooperate with the
City authorities in any way and that they were trying - -to operate the business in a
decent way and in no way wished to annoy their neighbors.
Police Chief, E. L. Rodgers, presented a letter for the Cduucil's information dated
August 6, 1965 from Mr. Seitz relative to these and similar problems at the.Pizza
Pantry.
Chief Rodgers continued that since the last council meeting he felt that the owners
had made an attempt to control their patrons as they have a uniformed officer on
duty during the periods when the dancing and entertainment ie going on,
City Council Minutes
September 6, 1966
Page 2
Mr, G. White, owner- Operator of the Rancho San Luis Motel, complained to the
Council of high speed traffic, noise, etc., in the vicinity of his motel on
Marsh Street which he felt was caused by customers and potential customers of
the Pizza Pantry - looking for.places to park.
He also felt that the patrons of the Pizza Pantry were the ones that used the
street for a drag strip.
Mrs. Murphy, representing the'Jack Estate, complained of nuisances committed
on her property by-Pizza Pantry,dustomers.
Mr. F. McNamara, owner of the Mid Town Motel, again appeared before the City
Council comp awning of the.:7roblems of noise and other disturbances caused by
patrons of the Pizza Pantry to tenants of his motel.
Mr. Fred Duncan, employee of the Pizza Pantry, stated he felt that the high
speed traffic problem was a common one for the City of San Luis Obispo due to
the lack of enforcement officers and to the large majority of young people
attending the..High School and colleges of the area who cruise the streets.
Mr. Duncan continued he felt that Mr. Collins was attempting to operate a decent
legitimate business and one that was needed in the community for the young adults
and he stated as an employee of the establishment that their instructions were
to keep the situation in control inside the building and to inspect identification
cards so that only persons of legal age could partake of alcoholic refreshments.
Councilman Gallagher stated that after looking into the matter, he felt the City
presently has no control over this type of operation'and felt that sometime in the
future the Council should consider the adoption of some ordinance to control
noise.and disturbances to adjacent property owners.
Councilman Blake stated that since the last meeting he has personally investigated
is genera area and felt that the Pizza Pantry operator had taken steps to
control it and to reach a solution to the problem.
Mr. T. Collins, operator of the Pizza Pantry, appeared before the City Council
an
explained to +the City Council his operation in inspecting indentification
cards and attempting to keep underaged youngsters out of the beer drinking area.
Furthur, Mr. Collins stated that he had been complimented by agents of the
Alcoholic Beverage Control Department on the type of good operation he was
running at his establishment.
Ma or Whelchel suggested that a final determination on this matter be continued
until an opinion is received from the City Attorney as to the jurisdiction of
the Council in this matter as.to the possible revocation of the business license.
The matter was continued to September 19, 1966.
3. On motion of Councilman Gallagher',
permit was grantees e.standlng
Higuera Street. Motion carried. .
seconded by Councilman Spring, the use,
sign for Weaver Motors company at 1166
4. Communication from Peter F. Ferrero offering to trade or sell his property
at 864 Osos Street for property owne y the City was ordered received and filed
and Mr. Ferrero was to be notified that the City is not intrested in acquiring
his property.
5. Communication from the Count Health Department requesting funds for additional
control of an aquatic inset G problem at aguna Lake. The Health Depart-
ment proposes to use two seperate chemical treatments to be sprayed on the lake
surface by a helicopter.
Mr. Miller, Administrative Officer, explained to the City Council the work done
tom on this problem at Laguna Lake and stated he felt the City should proceed
and-help to clean this problem up.
on motion of Councilman Miller,.seconded by Council Gallagher a request of the
Health Departmen was approved limited to §300 with the State Staff to supervise.
Motion carried.
1
1
1
City Council Minutes
September 6, 1966
Page 3
6. on motion.of Councilman Spring, seconded by_.Councilman Miller, Mr. Alfred Gross,
1461 Mill Street, was appointed to the vacancy on the City Traffic Committees
Motion carried.
7. Communication from Ward McBraver and Kathleen HaBraver- notifying the City Council
that they had purchased the Yellow Cab Company- and- Frandhise in the City and asked
' that the certificate in the name of Jack Hathaway be transferred to them. Further
they informed the City Council.that Mr. John Axman was no longer connected with the
M
P Cab Company and asked that their certificate be amended and be in the name of
Ward and Kathleen &Brayer,only.
Mr. McBrayer stated he planned to keep"all the'cabs blue and white with the exceptior
of one which would be painted yellow in order to keep the national franchise granted
by the Yellow Cab Company.
Mayor Whelchel stated he felt personally that all the cabs operated in the City
should be painted one color for which he had no preference and further felt that all
cab drivers should be in uniform. -
-- Councilman Spring stated that he also felt that all the cabs.should be one color
scheme and also that the drivers should be in a neat uniform bu_t.felt that the
matter of cab stands should be considered by the Councilmon an individual basis.
Councilman Blake asked could the City grant an exclusive franchise in order to'avoid
past problems with more than two operators doi.ng.business'in the City.
Mr. Blake also stated that he was in -favor of all the.cabs -being one.color.
Mr. Blake was informed, that the City could not-grant an exclusive franchise for
taxi operation other than what was provided in the original cab ordinance, and the
existing operator could be given first, choice on any expansion required by the
addition of extra cabs.
Councilman Gallagher stated he had no objection to more.than one color scheme on
the cabs but he did feel the drivers should be in distinctive uniforms.
Councilman Miller at that he felt there should be one consolidated cab operation
personally he had no preference of color and felt it was up to'.the owner and felt
that the drivers should be in uniform and that when the color scheme was decided
upon by the operator, that the cabs be painted_ at such a time.as they were needed on
an individual basis.
The City Council then discussed with Mr .. McBrayer possible completion of color
schemes for the cab operation in the City,
on.motion of Mayor Whelchel, seconded by.Councilman Miller; that-the Certificates
of Public Convenience and Necessity for the'A&M Cab'Company and the Yellow Cab
Company be transferred to Ward Wrayer and Kathleen XcBrayer,'that the McBrayers
be given,.15 mouths.to have the cabs.painted. one color, color to be the choice of
the McBrayers and the drivers to be in uniform. Motion.carried. -• - --
Mr. Wraver brought to the Council's attention the fact that occasionally cabs
operated by out of City companies..were picking up passengers within the City at cut
rate prices and felt that he should have some protection on this problem.
The City Clerk was instructed,.by the City council 'to write the offending cab.,*—
companies notifying them that they were operating in the.City without a license-and
in violation of the Municipal Code and to cease such activities.
8. - Communication-from the C. S. - Construction.Compe -requesting -an extension of
time for the Street Resurfacing Project, 4S -79 due to various changes in the
contract and delay in materials delivery. '
Mr. Romero, City Engineer, recommended that the contraci--time- be-extended'as
requested to September 9, 1966.
Extension of time was approved on motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by
Councilman Miller. Motion carried.
City Council Minutes
September 6, 1966
Page 4
9. Communication from the Planning Commission recommending that the request of
Crocker- Citizens Bank on behalf of the Motel Inn owners for abandonment of
Monterey Street in front of the Motel Inn be approved subject to the retention
of an easement for the existing water line.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Blake, the following
resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 15'9-5'.--a resolution of intention to
abandon a portion of Monterey Street. ,
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Emmons Blake, Erank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
X. Mayor Whelchel introduced Mr. F. Wallace, the new manager of the Chamber of
Commerce and Economic Development Director for the City of San Luis Obispo listing
some of the past assignments held by Mr. Wallace and explaining the cooperative
appointment by the City and the Chamber in order to encourage the Economic Develop-
ment Program of the City.
10. The following communication from the Planning Commission recommending against
the rezoning of property located at the rear of 951, 963 and 975 Foothill
Boulevard for the following reasons:
(1) Not a_ logical extension of C -1 zoning.
(2) Rezoning would penalize adjoining R -1 development.
(3) Would add to traffic problems in this area.
(4) Additional commercial development in this area would be a
direct threat to the C.B.D.
There was considerable objection to this proposal from adjoining property
owners on the grounds of:
(1) Increased traffic congestion on Chorro Street.
(2) Rezoning would lead to increased taxes on adjacent homes.
(3) This would be an encroachment of commercial property in a single
family area.
(k) There is adequate C -1 zoning in the area to handle neighborhood
shopping needs.
(5),It would not be ethical for the City to receive a donation of
land for widening in exchange for a rezoning.
Mr. Kenneth Schwartz , Chairman of the Planning Commission, appeared before the
City Council and explained the reasons for the denial of this rezoning request
by the Commission.
Dr. A. Clawson appeared before the City Council urging that the.City Coun633:,
bppose any change in zoning in this general area due primarily to the increased
traffic that would be generated, the deterioration of a £ime residential neighbor-
hood, that there is too much commercial zoning in the area at the present time
and that this would be an encroachment•in the center of a residential area.
Mr. H. Carr appeared before the City Council urging that they not consider '
this rezoning on the basis of increased traffic, narrowness of streets, and
encroachment of commercial into a residential zone .
On motion of Councilman Miller,, seconded by Cohncilman Spring, that the City
Council accept the denial of the rezoning by the Planning Commission and pro-
ceed with the widening of Foothill BoYlevard under a restricted policy. Motion carried.
9:00 P.M. Mayor Whelchel declared a recess. The meeting reconvened at 9:10 P.M.
with all Councilman present.
11. Communication from the Planning Director reporting to the City Council on the
activities of his office regarding student housing occupancy rsstrictions in the
zoning ordinance•to multiple dwellings in the City.
Mr. Chapman reported that 12 operators have received use permits for student
occupancy, 10 have reported that they do not rent to students, but that 91
properties should be inspected to determine compliance with the zoning ordinance.
1
7
I
1
i
City Council Minutes
September 6, 1966
Page 5
Mr. Chapman suggested that this'.Laspection be made a'month after•Poly opens if the
enforcement of the ordinance:fs to be' 'effectine:..
Mr. Chapman suggested that the City Council hire a part time employee to conduct
this survey.
After discussion of.the recommendation by the City Council, the City Staff was
requested to follow up on the recommendations.'and the matter to be continued to the
meeting of October 17, 1966.
12. Communication from the Planning Commission recommending that the City Council
adopt the amended General Plan. This is the General Plan discussed with the City
Council at past study sessions and on which the Planning Commission has held a
public hearing at which time no.ob.jections were registered to the proposed amend-
meats.
... ..
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council hold a public hearing on
this plan as amended and then refer it to the County Board of Supervisors to also
adopt the plan as amended.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, that the City
Council hold 'a public hearing on the General Plan at 8:00 P.M. on.Monday, getebe0102FOr�1M
17, 1966. Motion carried.
13. Communication from the Planning Director notifying the City Council that the
supply of Industrial Economic Surveys prepared by Hahn Wise and Associates in 1963
under, the 701 Program is practically exhausted. He stated that H. Wise and
Associates could reprint the 1963 report for approximately $1.00 per copy.
W. Chapman continued that the Planning Consultant "could update the report for-
approximately $1,200. to $1,400 including printing and he would so recommend to the
City Council.
The request for updating the Industrial Economic Report was referred to Mr. F.
Wallace, City Director of Economic Development,"for comment and report back to the
Council at the October 17, 1966 meeting.
14. Mr. Romero, City Engineer, presented for the Council's consideration plans and
specifications for installation of the sewer line on Prado Road to serve the Standar2
Oil Company Service Station to be leased from the City.
Mr. Romero explained the various construction details shown on the plans.
On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Spring, the plans were
approved but not to be advertised until the lease is signed by the Standard_Oil
Company. Motion carried.
15. Mr. Romero, City Engineer, presented plans and specifications for the construc-
tion of a parking lot at the rear of the City Recreation Building as requested -by
the City Council.
Mr. Romero stated that the estimated cost would be $2,600.00 and that it would_
provide 22 spaces for parking.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, the plans and
specifications were approved and the City Engineer was authorized to proceed.
16. Mr. Romero, City Engineer, presented for the Council's'sonsideration plans and
specifications for resurfacing local streets as provided in the 1966 -67 budget.
Mr. Romero stated that the estimated cost of said resurfacing would be approximately.
$32,000.
On motion of Councilman•Miller, seconded by Councilman.Gallagher, the plans and
specifications were approved. Motion carried.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Spring, that the Mueller
property on Beebee Street be_allowed.an exception on sidewalk from 10 to 6 feet.
Motion carried.
City Council Minutes
September 6., 1966
Page 6
17. On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman S2ring, the
following resolution was-lntroduced ":'Resolution No;: 1596" a!;resb1ution:-
authorizing the Mayor to sign the Utill!F-'A—greement-,for:relocation of..the water
line.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: . Emmons. Blake' - - ,Frank" Gallagher.- Arthur 7--:-,Sprifig;:c
_-'--�:Dmiald Q*-'Millef! Clell-W;'Whelchel. 7 :j
NOES: None
ABSENT.--, None :._.:.
Q:
18. bn- motion-,of r Councilman• seconded by-Councilman Galla&')ier-,',-, the
ing Ordinance was introduced for final passage, Ordinance No, 353., an-: ordinancii7�,'!'
levying a tax for the current 1966-67 fiscal year upon 41 Uaxa property with-
in the City-of San'•Luis 'Obij6p6% Andnf-I'Joini-g the rate of, such- tax.,13:-
Finally passed on the following roll call vote:
-_4 -
-Gall_ aghbr* -Arthux,&S
pring.4
-Donald Q. Miller, CV0.1 W; Whelchel 1 L
NOES: None
ABSENT Vone-'; IL
19, On moticn •6f:-Coun"*c.i3.man'Bla";'isecondeiI by.Cquh61lfhan:,Sprih i-thblfollowing:'
resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1591., a resolution increasing the 1966-67
budget,.:J-! :w:'-'
J*:
`Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: I% e<
AYES; Emmons:-'Blaks'7 Frank - Gallagheri-I Arthur.: . F:.-'.. Spri'ng
'-ODanald"Q:::-Miller Clell W.--Whelbhel
NOES: None
ABSENT- -None--:-? ,
20. The City Clerk reported the following bids received for Municipal Parking
Lot No. 11
7
BMM-'CONSTRIJCT-IONI-CCMPANY-I--.-_,;4f% .$12'.91i3.7
P..''O. Box 957
San Luis Obispo., California I",::: r
01=At- AND-, SON;"--- --
315
9"
San Luis Obispo, California
C.'- Su * -CONSTRUCTION:', COMPANY,
P. 0. Box Box 24 7
Pismo Beach., California
TED-WATKINS CONSTRUCTION. 16 'O1-17*5O-'J'_'_. > 7:7;:
P. 0. Box 1380
San Y--,Califbh2iaj"- Z 0% 3 U
.; Luis: Ob'isT;o'
Z L
GUIDO 0. FERMI 169379,00
P.O. Box•558
Santa Maria,, California
MADmu_.coNsTnuqTipN- COMPANY " lm-7,9 9.79-.5P
P. 0. Box 910 7 k' -y.
San Luis Obispo, California
T
On motion' of:Cbuifci1T9m . da11ag ' r,. 'se c- 6idea by- Counc il-a—'Bli0--thd-
lbv bid of.
Burke Construction Company was accepted. Motion carried,
1
11
City Council Minutes
September 6, 1966
Page 7
21. The City Clerk reported on the following bids received to supply two motor
scooters to the City of San Luis Obispo. .
Item 1 Item 2
POWER LIFT COMPANY $1,460. $299209
Oxnard, California
GRAY LIFT, INC. 1,625. 32250,
Fresno, California
On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Spring, the'low bid
of Power Lift Company was accepted. Motion carried.
The Administrative Officer was requested to investigate and see if the motor
scooters being traded in were in any better condition than the motor scooter in
use at the sewer plant.
Y, The Commander of the local post of the American Legion introduced-Mr. Robert
Patterson who is chairman of the Legion's local law'and order committee in.
augarated to perpetuate respect for law and order and to cooperate with the
Civil Defense authorities in order to help law enforcement personnel in the City
and County in case of a national disaster or emergency.
Mr. Patterson stated he was working very closely with the City's Director of
Civil Defen .
Mr. Patterson also announced that on November 1, 1966 the local chapter of the
Veterans of World Wa]r 1 will hold a celebration honoring the Veterans of World
War 1 to which all will be invited to participate.
Mayor Whelchel thanked the legion Commander and Mr. Patterson for their
cooperation with Civil Defense,
22.. On motion of 'Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Miller, the
following contract payments were approved and ordered paid.
A -1 ELECTRIC
Traffic Signal Installation Est. # 4 (85% complete) $5,718.96
WEST COAST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Est. #3 (62p complete) 11,913.62
Edna Road Sewer Project (C.O. #1 $39088.58)
C. S. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Est. #2 (90% complete) 21,793.62
Street Resurfacing SS -79
WEST COAST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Est. #400 complete) 133547
E1 Centro Way Drainage
WEST COAST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Est. #5 (100% complete) 1081.80
E1 Centro Drainage
Motion carried.
Mr. Romero, City Engineer, recommended that the contract payments be made but
that on the El Centro Way Drainage Project West Coast Construction was ten days
over the completion date and he recommended that the City withhold $500 liquid -
ation damages on this project.
Mr. Romero read a letter sent by his office to the West Coast Construction
om�tifying them in sufficient time to complete this project and avoid
any delay.
Mr. Romero then presented a letter from the West Coast Construction Company
listing the reasons they felt that they were entitled to additional days for
work on this project.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, that the City
Council enforce the liquidation damages and delete 1900 from the contract
payment for this project. Motion carried.
City Council Minutes
September 6, 1966
Page 8
23. Communication from Dr. F. R. Mugler notifying the City Council of the'
hospitalization requiring sick leave in'excess of four days for Mrs. Laura Gill.
Sick leave authorized for Mrs. Gill on motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded
by Councilman Miller. Motion carried.
24. On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, the Mayor
was authorized to accept and record the following deeds on behalf of the City of
San Luis Obispo,
1. Grant Deed and Agreement from San Luis Obispo Lodge # 1401, Loyal
Order of Moose., for connection of their building to the sewer main at no cost
to the City and street widening on Orcutt Rodd.
2, Grant Deed and Agreement from Teresa C. Gilardi for construction
of curb, gutter and sidewalk and street widening on Santa Rosa Street.
3, Grant Deed and Agreement from C. R. & A. G. Easter for curb, gutter
and sidewalk on Orcutt Road.
Motion carried.
25. R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer, announced the appointment of Marian
Willis as stenographer in the City Engineer's Office effective September 1, 1966
at $375 per month subject to a probationary period of one year.
26. Mr. Romero, City Engineer, presented the City Council with a progress re-
port on street widening on Foothill Boulevard to Santa Rosa.
Santa Rosa Street, west side Palm to Monterey Street, Gilardi agreement and grant
deed signed, work to be completed this winter. Mrs. Barcellos is ready to sign
the deed and agreement but stated she is unwilling to leave any portion of her
building projecting into the City right of way and insists that as part of the
widening her porch be reconstructed to the new property line.
Mr. Romero stated he had received informal estimates, the lowest of which would
be 1,200, to cut the porch back and then Mrs. Barcellos would sign the grant
deed and agreement.
On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Spring, that the City
Engineer proceed with the contract to cut the porch back to the new property
line. Motion carried.
27. Police Chief Rodgers reported to the City Council on the results of the
Police Lieutenant examination held to fill the vacancy of Lt. Malmen who had
resigned and since that time another resignation was received from Lt. Bishop.
Therefore, Chief Rodgers recommends that Sgt. Sperlo be promoted to lieutenant
effective September 6, 1966 at step 4 $710 and that Sgt. Morris be promoted to
lieutenant effective September 16, 1966 at step 4 710 per month.
Chief Rodgers then stated that there were still eligible candidates for sergeant
from the prior examination list and recommends that Officer Quinn be promoted
to sergeant effective September 6, 1966 at step 4 $635 per month and that Officer
Morrissey be promoted to sergeant effective September 16, 1966 at step 4 $635
per month.
R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer, stated to the Council that he concurred in
the recommendation of Police Chief Rodgers for these promotions.
R. D. Miller requested that the City Council grant the salary increase to
ffic�oerntlein to Step 2 at $521 per month, effective October 1, 1966.
Salary step increase approved on motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by
Councilman Spring. Motion carried
28. Communication from W. R. Fredman on behalf of Pacific Western Contractors
Association developers of Madonna Road Plaza notifying the City Council that they
have exhausted all means of acquiring an easement for road and sewer purposes
across the easterly portion of the adjacent real property owned by Mrs. Rosa Leal.
1
1
City Council Minutes
September 6, 1966
Page 9
He stated that the developer's proposal included the development of the road, sewer
and other utilities at no cost to the land owner.
Therefore on behalf-of the developers; W. Fredman' requested that the City-of San
Luis Obispo take whatever steps are legal-and proper to assist in providing road,
sewer and utility access of a sufficient portion of Mrs. Leal's property to assure
proper development of their property and adjoining land owners.
On motion of Councilman Spiins;'seconded by Councilman Gallaghe r - ,.that the acting
City Attorney, B. S. Crossman, be authorized -to proceed with the necessary steps
to acquire an'easement for road and sewer purposes- on•the Leal property. Motion
carried.
29. The City Council adjourned to an executive session to discuss potential property
acquisitions subject to- litigation._.... - ......_.
30. On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Miller, the meeting
adjourned. :. ...
r
Approved: September I9, 1966
CITY CLERK
U