Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/20/19671 1 1 City Council Minutes February 20, 1967 Page 3 The matter was continued until the matter of the existing lease.is.cleared up. 4: Communication from the County Coordinating Council to the City. Council forwarding additional information supporting their request for the State Delinquency Prevention Commission to make a study of ways and means of minimizing or preventing juvenile delinquency in San Luis Obispo. R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer, reported:to the City Councilmon a telephone call he had received from the City Manager in Oxnard, California regarding this type of survey and stated those making the study proceeded in a businesslike manner and did not take up a great deal of staff time. Final recommendations were conservative and geared . to the City's financial capability. The report was somewhat critical of the school system. Police Chief, E. L. Rodgers, stated that he did not believe that there was any juvenile delinquency problem in the City of San Luis.Obispo other than the normal minor traffic incidents. Councilman Spring stated he did not believe there was any reason for conducting a survey regarding juvenile delinquency as he felt there was no problem in our Community. Mayor Whelchel stated that he felt this might be excellent information for the City and the School District to have in order to anticipate any problems that might arise in the future. Councilman Gallagher stated that he felt that the City of San Luis Obispo had .a good Police Department and an active Recreation Department and that they were doing a good job. He further felt that there was no need for a study at this .time to find out what the conditions would be five years from now as the situation would most likely change and the report would serve no purpose. On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Mayor Whelchel, the following .resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1657, a resolution requesting a "Youth Needs Survey" by the - California Delinquency Prevention Commission. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Emmons Blake, Donald'.Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel NOES: Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring ABSENT: None 5. At this time the City Council held a public hearing on the costs of sidewalk construction under.the,1911 Act for the following properties: . A. J. J. & L. Gonzales_,_ 390 Islay Street $ 237.00 V. R. Soper 129 Beebee Street 172.00 W. 0. & M. L. Lovelady 130 Price Street 270.00 B. The following property owners have requested the three year option payment plan: N. & G. Rubashack F: &:H..Mueller T. M. Burch Johnson Highlands, Inc. D. D. & E. M. Law 321 North Chorro Street 308.00 198 South Street also Beebee 1,125.00 Street-side , 1447 Beach Street ( Buchon St. 327.69 side also 486 Buchon Street) 175 High Street ( Beebee Street 339.00 side) 275 N. Chorro Street 999.00 City Council Minutes February 20, 1967 Page 4 D. D. & E. M. Law. 303 N..Chorro:Street 236.00 M..Polin _ _ .790.Foothill (N.,Chorro.St. ...1,750.51 side) Mayor Whelchel declared the public hearing open. No one appeared before the City Council•:on this matter'. Mayor Whelchel declared the public hearing closed. On motioa of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, the following resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1658, a resolution confirming costs of sidewalks constructed under the 1911 Act. Passed and adopted on'the following roll call vote: AYES: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring, Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel NOES: None ABSENT:, None 6. At this time the City Council held a publichearing'confirming the costs of sidewalk repairs under the 1911 Act for the following properties: J: A. & E. A. Beretta 360 Chorro Street $ 60.63 C.- Davis- 274 Chorro Street 49.93 G. S. & M. C. Dunham M. G. Jackson, Etal T. Machado C. A. & A. Richina D.: St. Clair St. Stephens Episcopal Church G. N. Thomas, Etal C. & E. E. Valys Jane Wreden 1020 -1022 Grove Street 114.60 790 Islay-Street 34.92 280 Higuera Street 40.26 258 Chorro Street 11.10 380 Marsh Street 125.77 1334 -1344 Nipomo Street 200.56 1440 Marsh Street 172.22 288 Chorro Street 50.93 1746 Chorro Street also 317.58 Church Street side Mayor Whelchel declared the public hearing open. No one appeared before the City Council on this matter. Mayor Whelchel declared the public hearing closed. On motion of Councilman Gal- l-agher, seconded by Councilman Miller, the following resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1659, a resolution confirming costs of sidewalks repaired pursuant to the 1911 Act and making said costs a lien against the property and collectible with City taxes. Passed•and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring, Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel' NOES: None ABSENT: None 1 1 1 City Council Minutes February 20, 1967 Page 5 7. At this time the City Council held a public hearing on the recommendation of the City Traffic Committee to initiate a one way street system on Pismo and Buchon Streets, traffic would run west on Pismo Street and east on Buchon Street. Mayor Whelchel declared :the public hearing open. ' D. F. Romero, City Engineer, explained the cost, the advantages and disadvantages and the necessity for making the one -way street pair attractive to the motorist. He explained also that speeds would probably increase slightly, however, they would be controlled somewhat by the synchronized traffic signals. He also explained that it might be necessary to install additional traffic signals after the one -way street system is in operation. If adopted, the system could be placed in operation in about six months. Fire Chief, Lee Schlobohm, upon question, stated that the one way street system on Pismo Street would be of no hinderance to the operation of his Department and did not feel that it would hurt in their response to fires. Police Chief, E. L. Rodgers, stated that the one way street system would in no way affect the operation of his Department. Mr. Rademacher asked how the one way street system would affect parking. Mr. Romero explained that there would probably be a net gain of.several parking spaces and that maneuvering in and out of private driveways would be much simpler.since the motorist would be concerned only with traffic from one direction. Mr. Vern Lloyd asked if under this plan was Pismo Street to be widened. ' Mr. Romero explained that this plan would eliminate the necessity of widening Pismo Street in the near future but that ultimately widening would probably be required. Mrs. Tanner, 1166 Pismo Street, brought to the Council's attention the existing problem of- access to her property due to the narrowness of the driveway and the old style curb cut and she felt that this problem would be aggravated by a one way street system. Mr. Peters, 1100 Buchon Street, complained of potential high speed traffic on one way street systems. Mr. Petersen also questioned the advisability of one way streets.due- .- to.the increased.speed and traffic and.these are quite narrow. . Mr. Warnagieris asked what was the City's plans regarding the restricted access to Pismo Street from Johnson Avenue. . ,t: , - Mr. Romero explained-that the proposed plan would lessen the existing traffic hazards-on Johnson at both Pismo and Buchon. Mrs. Hanrahan questioned the need of traffic devices on the proposed one way street.system particularly'at.Pismo and-.Johnson.Avenue. R. Jorgenson stated he felt-:that-one way streets-would increase the use of the streets causing higher speeds which would be dangerous. Mr. Peters felt that one way--streets would encourage their use by more trucks and cars to the detriment of the residential properties. Mr. Al Harter asked if there would be stop signs at Buchon and Chorro Streets. Mr. Romero stated that signs would remain as they are at present. W. George Wilson, 1050 Pismo Street, asked when automatic traffic signals would be installed at. Santa -Rosa and Pismo Streets: City Council Minutes February 20, 1967 Page 6 Ruth Korsmeyer suggested that in addition to one way streets that the City - Council restrict parking on Buchon Street from 4:00 A.M. to 6:00 A.M. so that renters in the area and tenants would be forced to park their cars'off the street. Mr. Rademacher objected to one way street systems due to the potential of. increased traffic. Mayor Whelchei declared the public hearing closed. Councilman Spring stated.he was in favor of initiating this one way street system as it would be safer and would eliminate the dangerous intersection at Johnson Avenue. Councilman Gallagher stated he was opposed to this plan as he felt the proposal was premature and without other safeguards, he felt this would be dangerous to children. Councilman Miller stated he was in favor of the one way street system. Mayor Whelchel stated that he felt the intersection of Johnson Avenue and Buchon Streets would be helped by the installation of one way street systems. He further felt that one way traffic on Pismo Street was needed as he felt it was running at near capacity at this time and urged the City Council to adopt the proposal. ' Councilman Gallagher suggested that the City investigate improving the north side of Pismo Street at Johnson Avenue to its full width which would increase safety at this intersection and would be able to handle traffic more adequately. On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Spring, the following resolution was introduced. - Resolution No. 1660; -a resolution establishing ' portions of Pismo Street and Buchon Street as one -way streets. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Emmons .Blake, Arthur F. -Spring, Donald Q. Miller, Clell W..Whelchel NOES: Frank Gallagher ABSENT: None 8. Communication from Joe Warnagieris requesting that the City Council postpone the weed abatement on his property at this time as he feels it is too early in the year to eliminate the weeds and he felt that a later time in the -summer would be soon'enough to eliminate the fire'hazard. Fire Chief Lee Schlobohm explained to the City Council the program being developed by the Fire Department for weed abatement which requires rototilling at an early date and to eliminate as much burning of lots as possible in the City. Mr. Warnagieris stated he-had no complaint against the -Fire Department as he felt that they are doing a good job, but only asked that the City Council put off the deadline for abating weeds on his property at least until June 1, 1967. On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Blake, the abatement of weeds on the Warnagieris parcel be put off until June 1, 1967. Motion carried. 9. Communication from William Fredman regarding development of Madonna Plaza was asked to be taken off the agenda. 10. At this time the City Council considered an amendment to the proposed lease with the Art Association for land in the Mission Plaza area. Mr. Johnson, City Attorney, briefed the lease section by section for the City Council and discussed the various provisions with members of the Art Association present. City Council Minutes February 20, 1967 Page 7 On motion,of Councilman Blake,. seconded by Councilman Gallagher, the following ordinance was introduced. Ordinance- No. 367, an ordinance, authorizing and approving.the lease of certain property in -the Mission Plaza area to the San Luis Obispo Art Association. Introduced and passed to print on the following roll call vote: AYES. Emmons B1ake,..Frank.Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring, Donald.Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel. .- NOES: None ..%ABSENT: None 15. .Communication from R. D. Young, Planning Director, forwarding the recommenda- tion of the City Planning Commission regarding the Cornet building was referred to the City Council Committee studying disposition of the building with the Committee to report at the next regular meeting. Mayor Whelchel called•a. recess at 9:20:P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:30 P.M. with all Councilmen present.. X. Mr. Peter Kardel, Attorney representing the Johnson Estate, submitted a proposal for the development of the Johnson Trust> property and the City owned property in the Mission Plaza area. Mr. Kardel proposed that.both.the.City and the Johnson Trust enter into an agreement for development of their.respective properties. Mr..Kardel.suggested that.prior to July 1, 1967 the City develop the Creek area in the Mission Plaza with waterfalls and pools, that-the-City proceed with the realignment of Monterey Street at Chorro, that the City construct a suspension ' bridge behind the Berkemeyer Store building and that the City assume the $1,000 option for:purchase;of: the Fredericks property.,. Also the City would demolish the Cornet Store building for installation of landscaped parking.and when this has been completed the Johnson properties would then develop the rear of their properties for inclusion in the Mission Plaza theme.. _. _.. . .f. . Also Mr. Kardel urged the City Council that by September 1, 1967 to remove the buildings-on Monterey_Street._and_complete. Parking: Lot No. 11. Mr. Kardel urged that the City proceed to acquire the Fredericks property for realignment of Monterey Street so that this area can be developed. He then stated if the.City:.would not proceed with all or some of these suggestions that the Johnson Estate would procure the Fredericks-property and,would develop stores not only-along Chorro and.Higuera Streets but also along Monterey Street by. the- Mission-.% :. Mr. Kardel stated that his principals have a guarantee from a financial institution of sufficient,funds.to proceed with the development of the'Johnson Trust piopertie "s. :. . . .. - n The City Council discussed with Mr. Kardel his proposals on behalf of the Johnson Estate_ and his demands for City action prior to the property owners action. . Councilman Blake suggested that the Council not.take action on this proposal until further studies have been.made of its implication. Councilman Gallagher stated he hoped that the Johnson Trust would back off in attempting to acquire the:Fredericks property.as - they are only confusing the acquisition. The City could then acquire the property along Monterey Street for street alignment- without fighting a third party. Councilman Miller stated that this proposal was a shock to him as he felt that prior negotiations with Mr. Kardel on behalf of the Johnson Trust were made in good faith and now this new proposal changes the entire concept of the initial discussions. City Council Minutes February 20, 1967 Page 8 Mr. Kardel stated he hoped that the City Council would do something to help save the downtown, if not, then there are going to be some real problems. He continued; listing the number of vacant stores in the Johnson Trust properties and hoped the City Council would help all the property owners. Councilman Spring suggested that if the Johnson Trust kept their properties up to date they would have no problem getting renters. He also felt that if Mr. Kardel iaould• back off on the Fredericks property the City Council could condemn and acquire this parcel for the realignment of Monterey Street. Mayor Whelchel stated that he did not feel that the City.should try to save the downtown businessman, but he did feel that the City Council should represent all the people in the Community and make the best development for their enjoyment. He also stated he did not feel the Mission Plaza Plan would save the downtown by itself, but felt that the Mission-Plaza could be made into a park for the enjoyment of the citizens of San Luis Obispo and maybe some benefit would rub off on the property owners and merchants. Mayor Whelchel felt that the property owners could help the downtown improvement by cleaning up their properties and.further he objected to the fact that the City kept running into road blocks by adjacent property owners on acquisitions of the Fredericks property for realignment of Monterey Street. Mr. J. Fabbri, Financial Consultant for Rodney Johnson and Mrs. R. Johnson, Sr., appeared before the City Council urging that they reconsider their action in adopting the Monterey Street realignment Plan B. He felt that some compromise between Plan A and Plan B must be arrived at, as Plan B takes too much land from the adjacent parking lot. He continued that he felt that the City had the same goal in developing the Mission Plaza or Gardens as the property owners and businessmen and felt that some cooperation in the approach must be made with the City and property owners. He then went through the list of suggestions presented by Mr. Kardel giving his feelings and reactions for each idea. He urged that the City Council accelerate their plans for earliest completion of the whole objective. The communication from Mr. Peter Kardel was received and filed. 11. The request to abandon a portion of Grove Street east of Higuera Street was continued. 12. Communication and recommendation from E. P. Thompson, Water Department Director, on water service for Tract No. 360 and report from E. P. Thompson on water- facilities needed to adequately serve the area in Zone 4 were continued. 13. At this time the City Council considered the proposal of Paul Adamson to design and prepare plans and specifications for construction of water system improvements consisting of a water storage tank and.appurtenances on San Luis Mountain, a pumping station on Serrano Street and a water line from Foothill and Broad Street to the new water pumping station. Mr. Adamson proposes to design the works, prepare plans and specifications, provide consultation and check pumping and working drawings for the fee of $7,400.00. Mr. Thompson, Water Department Director, recommended that the proposal be accepted. On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Miller, the following resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1661, a resolution approving proposal for design of water facilities. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring,: Donald Q. Miller, Cleli W. Whelchel NOES: None ABSENT: None 1 1 1 City Council Minutes February 20, 1967 Page 9 14. Mr..Thompson, Water Department Director,.reported to the'City Council that he had switched the water supply for the City from the Salinas Dam and Reservoir to the Whale Rock supply as of February 14, 1967 due to the degraded quality of the Salinas Dam water.. Mr. Thompson stated that subsequent to the storm occurring on or about December 7, 1966 the turbidity and acid intensity of Salinas water rose to the extent that ' it was.,not deemed feasible to hear the added costs of treatment. Complaints from customers and the availability of clean water.from Whale:,Rock also made it apparent that there was no defense for the continued use of Salinas water. 16: Communication from R. D. Young, Planning Director, regarding the request of Martin Polin to construct a 6' fence in the street yard and to encroach into the public right of way on Ramona Street was ordered received and filed as Mr. Polin has proceeded under.the,original conditions.of_his,use permit. 17. Mr. Romero; City Engineer, presented a progress report on preparation of plans and specifications for the Andrews Street footbridge. He explained that the structural members had been acquired and that the project could be ready to go to bid by-late-May or early June in order that construction could take place during the summer months. - 18 6 19.-- Councilman Miller suggested.that the'City- Council discuss a proposal that an ordinance'be adopted that would require a public hearing by the City Council.before any purchase of property of.$2,000'.or more in value would be made. Councilman Miller stated 'that the reason for this.;suggestion was to avoid too fast an action by the City=Council.in acquiring property without consulting with the citizens of the Community. The City Attorney, Harold Johnson, stated that if-.such a•policy were adopted, ' an exception would have to be recognized in the case of street widening-acquisi- tions and high priority needs where condemnation is contemplated... Councilman Gallagher stated that he agreed with Councilman Miller that some policy.should be established by the City Council for- handling property acquisitions so that the public would be aware of.what the Council was con- templating with their funds. He also felt that the City Council should not take any action to purchase property -at the meeting at which;it is presented but should be continued to a subsequent meeting: Councilman Gallagher stated he also felt that plans and specifications for Public Works Projects should not be adopted and-passed by the City Council at the meeting at which they are presented, as he felt the City Council should have an opportunity.to: study the.plans_ and specifications before they are put out to bid. He said that:in the-past many times the-plans and specifications are presented for Council approval when they are not even agenda items and no one has an opportunity to review their contents. Mayor Whelchel stated that he agreed with the two Councilmen that the public should be made aware of any property being considered for purchase by the City. He did not feel that-a formal ordinance or policy should:be.adopted-on this matter. Councilman Blake stated he did not feel that a specific-policy -be adopted as he felt it took the flexibility of operation out of the Council's hands. He.also.stated that he did not feel that he wished;to see the plans and specifi- cations prior to the Council meeting as he was not an engineer and that he would have to rely upon the City Engineer's recommendation. Councilman Spring stated that he felt he did not,wish to see a limit placed on the City Council on land purchases. Councilman Gallagher suggested••that the City could possibly- -get an opinion-from the property owners when they.were.considering purchase and then hold a public hearing to see what the public thinks of the purchase.and.its- proposed use. Councilman Miller agreed that the Council should be- allowed to inspect the plans City Council Minutes February 20, 1967 Page 10 and specifications on all'Public•Works'Projects before being approved by the City Council and being set for bid. Mr. Romero, City Engineer, pointed out that the proposal of delaying the approval of plans and specifications for two weeks between the Council meetings would make an unnecessary•delay and would often be detrimental to the City interest. He stated that plans and specifications were- available .to any Councilman prior to the meeting and that he would be happy to review any job with each Councilman upon request: Councilman Gallagher suggested that this matter be held over until the City Administrative Officer-has completed his survey-of-the Public Works Department. 20. Communication from D. F:-Romero; City Engineer, requesting that the City Council adopt firm regulations for liability insurance coverage to protect the City for any possible suit. Mr. Romero stated that the excavation permit at this time includes a general requirement for this insurance but that -there is no specific requirement. This matter was continued for further study and a report by the City Engineer regarding cost of insurance. 21. Communication from the City Engineer, D. F. Romero.-regarding the promotion of Edward Salas was referred to the City Administrative Officer on motion of Councilman Miller', seconded by-Councilman-Gallagher. 'Motion carried.. Communication from D. F. Romero, City Engineer, regarding the hiring of a mechanic in lieu of an equipment operator was referred to the'Administrative'officer, on motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Gallagher. Motion carried. 23.• Communication from Kenneth R: Anderson Company regarding an agreement ' for conducting feasibility studies on recreation at'the•Whale Rock Dam and Reservoir was continued. 24. Communication from "the California Roadside Council regarding the affect on local jurisdictions of a certain provision contained in the Federal Highway Beautification Act of 1965. On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Blake, -the following resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1662, a resolution opposing Section 131(8) of Public Law 89 -285, the Highway Beautification Act of 1965. passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher; Arthur F. Spring, Donald Q.- Miller, Clell W. Whelchel NOES: None ABSENT: None 25. Communication from La Fiesta Association relative to the advertising budget for La Fiesta 1967 was ordered received and filed and the Administrative Officer was requested to notify La Fiesta Association of the purchase procedures for advertising under City policy. 26. Communication from the Division of Highways relative to a proposed , abandonment of a portion of Abbott Street easterly of Henderson Street in San Luis Obispo. Mayor Whelchel stated that he objected to the Council considering abandonment of this street as he felt that'this street would be needed for a future access for an on ramp to highway 101. On motion of Mayor Whelchel, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, that the State be notified that the City does not wish to abandon any portion of Abbott Street. Motion carried. 27. on motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, the I�+ �J 1 1 City Council Minutes February 20, 1967 Page 11 following ordinance was finally passed. Ordinance No. 355, an ordinance incorporating additional amendments to the 1964 edition of the Uniform Building Code. Finally passed. on the. following roll call vote: AYES: Emm ons Blake, -Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring, Donald Q. Miller, Clell- W. Whelchel NOES: None ABSENT: None 28. On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Spring, the following resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1651, a resolution increasing the 1966/67 budget (Art Association). Passed. and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Emmons B1ake,.Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring, Clell• W. Whelchel NOES: Donald Q. Miller ABSENT: None 29. On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Miller, the Mayor was authorized to accept and record on behalf of the City the following grant deeds and street widening agreements. A. -Grant Deed and agreement from Mary Mae McQuaid for street widening on Johnson Avenue. B. Grant Deed and agreement from Charles V. Gates and Dorothy L. Gates for street widening on Johnson Avenue. Motion carried. 30. On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Miller, B. M. Walter was authorized sick leave in excess of two weeks. Motion carried. 31. The following progress report was received from the City Engineer on street widening acquisitions. NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BETWEEN TASSAJARA & CUESTA: Mr. Delmartini.and the City staff have come to a substantial agreement on the widening subject to City approval of a minor subdivision made necessary by the widening. EAST SIDE OF JOHNSON AVE. NORTH OF LIZZIE ST.:, 1 1760 Johnson: Mrs. Washburn's attorney and City Attorney Johnson are negotiating. 1746 Johnson and 1738 Johnson: Documents are presented for Council approval at tonight's meeting. 1730 Johnson: Mr. & Mrs. Chase have. a strong objection to the City's valuation for property acquisition and state they are opposed to a widening at their driveway unless a widening of the Bilodeau property is conducted at the same time. This last condition makes for an impossible problem, since the Council had previously agreed that the Bilodeau widening would- notibe conducted at this date. Since Mr. & Mrs. Chase are not receptive to the widening I recommend that we discontinue negotiations with them -and widen the remainder of the East side of Johnson Avenue up to Lizzie Street. City Council Minutes February 20, 1967 Page 12 Mr. Johnson stated that Mrs. Washburn would accept if the City would install a brick retaining wall in front of her house rather than the concrete wall normally installed when required by street widening purposes. . After discussion by the City:Council it was moved by Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, that if the Washburn's wished a brick retaining wall that they pay the difference between the brick and the concrete wall and allow it to be installed. Motion carried. Y. Councilman Miller brought to the Council's attention the matter of transferring the City's assessing and tax collection operations to the County of San Luis Obispo as requested by the State of California. Councilman Miller said that he had been looking into this•matter and felt that the City:would receive benefits from turning this function over to the County. Joe Warnagieris, County Assessor, upon question, stated that he was not soliciting the City's business as the cooperative approach between the City and the County that has been in existence over the past years has been an advantage to him and to the City. If the City Council wishes to turn the assessing over to the County, he would be more than happy to cooperate. He wished the City Council to know that he had no control over the collection or disposition of taxes and that the City should look into this matter for their budgetary problems. Mr. Warnagieris continued that if the City were to make this change, he did hope that they would make up their minds as soon as possible because of budgetary allowances he must make if this function were taken over.by the County. Mr. Warnagieris offered his complete cooperation whether the City turned the assessing over to the County or whether they kept it themselves. . The matter was again referred to the City Council for further study and ' recommendation. On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, the meeting adjourned. Motion carried. APPROVED: March 20, 1967 lr/ * - FITZPATRICK CITY CLERK MINUTES SPECIAL CALLED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL February 24, 1967 - 12:30 P.M. CITY HALL Roll- Call- City Staff Present: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring, Donald Q.-Miller, Clell W. Whelchel Present: H. Johnson,•City Attorney; J: H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk; E. L. Rodgers, Police Chief;.R.'D. Miller; Administrative Officer; R. D. Young, Planning Director; D. F. Romero; City Engineer.