Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/18/1970Pledge Roll Call City Staff MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA May 18, 1970 - 7:00 P.M. City Hall Present: Emmons Blake, Myron Graham, Arthur F..Spring, Donald Q. Miller, Kenneth E. Schwartz Present: R. D. Young, Planning Director; J. H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk; J. Stockton, Park and Recreation Supervisor; H. Johnson, City Attorney; R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer; D. F. Romero, City Engineer; E. Rodgers, Police Chief; L. Schlobohm, Fire Chief. 1. On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Spring, the following items were approved by motion or resolution on the following roll call vote: AYES: Emmons Blake, Myron Graham, Arthur F. Spring, Donald Q. Miller, Kenneth E. Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None A. The. minutes of the Council meetings of April 20, 21 & 28, 1970 and May 5 & 12, 1970. B. Claims against the City for the month of May 1970, subject to the approval of the Administrative Officer. C. The following salary step increases. Sylvia, Donald From Step 4 or Berliner, Eili From Step 2 or Hunt, Ralph - From Step 1 or Tanore, Leslie From Step 3 or Swaim, Marvin From Step 3 or - Fire Captain $845 to Step 5 or $895 s B. - Fireman $623 to Step 3 or $660 Fireman $590 to Step 2 or $623 - Janitor $460 to Step 4 or $485 - Maintenance Man II $545 to Step 4 or $572 D. The request for sick leave in excess of two weeks for George Robertson, City Engineer's Office. 2. Rudy Silva, Chairman of the Mission Plaza fund committee of the Downtown Association presented to the City Council funds totaling $395 toward the landscaping portion of the Mission Plaza project. Mr. Silva congratulated the City Council on moving ahead with the program and stated he felt the Mission Plaza would be a great asset to the downtown area and the entire _City of San Luis Obispo. 1 7I 1 City Council Minutes May 18, 1970 Page 2 2A. The San Luis Obispo County Historical Society presented the City Council- with a check in the amount of $105 as a contribution to the landscaping portion of the Mission Plaza project. 3 & 4. The City Clerk presented a petition from the residents of Swazey Street asking that the City Council take some action to control the dogs in the area, which have caused mailmen and newspaper boys to stop delivering due to attacks by vicious dogs. H. Johnson, City Attorney, stated that he has filed one complaint against the dogs' owner and that the hearing is scheduled to be held on May 28, 1970. R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer, presented for the Council's and the public's information, the proposed county -wide dog control ordinance. Uniform fees would be. established as follows: Annual license fees, $3.00 for male and spayed female and $4.00 for female. Daily Board Charge.: $1.00 Redemption Fees: $5.00 first occurrence and $10.00 for each occurrence therafter each year. Fee for duplicate license: $1.00 Penalty of $0.50 per month for delinquent licenses after March 1 of each year. Establishment of a uniform impounding time of these dogs before any dog is destroyed. A. S. Hiltunen, 2045 Swazey Street, appeared before the City Council on behalf of the residents of Swazey. He stated most of his neighbors felt that if the Council would raise the redemption fees for dogs at the pound, then possibly people would watch their dogs and not allow them to run wild and be picked up. He continued__ that many people, not only on Swazey Street, but throughout the community, felt that the leash law should be enforced, and dog owners should keep their dogs on their own property. He stated that all he and his neighbors ask is that•the ' people who own dogs control them so as not to disturb or annoy their neighbors. Mr. Hiltunen felt it was quite an imposition for residents of this area to have to pick up their mail at the Post Office on Marsh Street. He did not blame the postman for not delivering mail as he had been bitten by one of the -dogs on the street. He continued that during the 1969 -70 fiscal year, seven postmen in the City had been bitten by dogs, which cost them an average of $175 for medical treatment, etc. Mr. Hiltunen urged that the City take over the dog control in the City so that the Council could supervise the leash law. He again stated that he felt a higher redemption fee might improve the situation. Martin Paul, 2033 Swazey Street, stated that he-had been bitten by one of these dogs on his way to work and he urged that the City Council see that the leash law was enforced: H. Johnson, City Attorney, explained the methods that could be used to take action against dog owners who allowed their dogs to run loose and annoy people. He also explained that in the new dog control ordinance for county -wide enforcement, pro- visions were made to allow the employees of the animal shelter to issue citations to persons whose dogs were violating the leash law. E. Rodgers, Police Chief, stated he felt the citation procedure was well handled under the provisions of the.proposed ordinance. R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer, explained the problems involved if the City were to take over the animal control program. Arrangements would have to be made for impounding facilities and.destruction of unwanted dogs. Overtime compensated by time off would cut down on the time available for patrol. R. D. Miller continued that the City now pays $950 per month to Woods Animal Shelter for animal control within the City and that the animal shelter was asking for an increase to $1350 per month effective July 1, 1970. City Council Minutes May 18, 1970 Page 3 Councilman Spring stated he felt that the City should take over the dog control in the City as he felt that Woods Animal Shelter was not doing, and had never done an adequate job of controlling the dogs in the City. He also stated that in the years he had been on the Council, dog control had been one of the biggest problems and was a problem which had never been solved. Councilman Graham stated he felt that the new proposed ordinance would take care of many of the problems brought to the Council's attention, as it would allow the employees of the animal shelter to issue citations. ' Mayor Schwartz explained the conditions of the existing contract with Woods Animal Shelter and the job they were to perform under the contract. He contin- ued that if the City were to take over the animal control.program within the City he felt it would be much more expensive, although it might be more effec -. tive with the City supervising its own employees and using its own equipment. Mayor Schwartz then briefed the study made by the County Mayor's Association in an attempt to obtain a uniform dog control ordinance for the entire county. This ordinance would eliminate confusion at the animal shelter caused by the different leash laws within the county. Councilman Spring again questioned the reason for the City not handling the animal control program, as he felt that for the amount of tax money being given to Woods Animal Shelter, the City could do a better job. He hoped that the Coun- cil.-would concur and develop a good dog control program to be operated by the City. He felt such a program would satisfy any problems. Councilman Blake stated he felt that the redemption fees should be increased as requested by the residents of Swazey Street. He felt that the existing ordin- ance did not allow the animal shelter to break even on each dog picked up. The City Council thanked the petitioners for bringing this problem to their attention. The matter was continued for further action at the June 1, 1970 meeting. 5. Communication from A. C. Johnson appealing the Council decision of May 4 ' which required that he .place full one -half street paving on Lizzie Street and Wilding Lane. Mr. Johson stated he felt the decision was unfair as he still felt that Lizzie Street and Wilding Lane were City streets with sufficient base and •paving. He felt as fair .cbmpiomise . to the.problemcwould be.�for..:him to supply the materials and the City install the paving. Councilman Spring stated he had inspected these streets several times and had looked into the utility ditches. He felt they were City streets and had been so used for many years. However, he felt they were not up to City standard. He felt the compromise offered by A. Johnson was fair to both sides. Councilman Blake stated he felt A. Johnson was an intelligent man'and had been aware of the conditions in the subdivision agreement at the time he signed it. He did not feel that the tax payers of the City should be required to pay for a private subdivision. Councilman Graham stated there was some question in his mind on existing con- ditions on the street and whether it was truly a City street. On motion of Councilman.Graham, seconded by Councilman Spring, that an exception be granted to the subdivision requirement, with A. C. Johnson to supply the pav- ing materials and the City forces to do the work required to bring Lizzie Street and Wilding Lane to City standards. Councilman Miller stated he had no sympathy for Mr. Johnson as he had signed the , subdivision agreement voluntarily. He continued that if Mr. Johnson did not wish to finish the requirements of the subdivision, then he should abandon the project. . Mayor Schwartz stated he felt there was some room for compromise due to the ex- isting conditions on the street and the fact that the street had been maintained by the City for a period of years in order to provide adequate access to the sub. division. City Council Minutes May 18, 1970 Page 4 The motion passed on the following roll call vote: AYES: Myron Graham, Arthur F. Spring, Kenneth E. Schwartz NOES: Emmons Blake, Donald Q. Miller ABSENT: None 6. Communication from the City of Morro Bay requesting the City of.San Luis Obispo support the request for the County Board of Supervisors to take over the super- vision of the County Office of Economic Opportunity.. On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Spring, the request,.was re- ceived and filed. Motion carried. 7. Communication from the League of Women Voters requesting that the City Council support Propositions 2, 3, 4 & 5 which will appear on the -Primary Ballot of June 2, 1970, dealing with revising and updating the California State Constitution. They also asked that the Council support Proposition No. 7 which would increase the standard interest rate on State bonds from 5% to 7 %. On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Blake, the following reso- lution was introduced. Resolution No. 2042, a resolution in support of propositions 2, 3, 4 & 5 & 7 on the June 1970 Primary Ballot, Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Emmons Blake, Myron Graham, Arthur F. Spring, Donald Q. Miller, Kenneth E. Schwartz NOES: None ' ABSENT: None 8. Dr. Charles E. Seger appeared before the City Council requesting that the City Council endorse Proposition No. 1, the Health Sciences Bond Act, which will be on the June.2 Primary Election Ballot. He continued that Proposition 1 would establish funds through a multi - million dollar bond, to be used for the construc- tion of health science training facilities'which: were needed•'in order to' maintain an adequate number of doctors, dentists, nurses, etc. to serve the needs of the people of California. Ed Atkinson and William Watson, members of the Support Proposition 1 Committee, appeared before the City Council urging support of this proposition. On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Graham, the following reso- lution was introduced. Resolution No. 2043, a resolution supporting Proposition 1 on the June 1970 primary ballot authorizing bonds for Health Science Facilities. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Emmons Blake, Myron Graham, Arthur F. Spring, Donald Q. Miller, Kenneth E. Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None ' 9. Communication from John Sues requesting permission of the City Council to use City property for a promotional .gold mining operation in San Luis Creek. The op- eration was to encourage people to come to the gold mining and then stay in down- town San Luis Obispo for shopping. Dan Gorton appeared before the City Council on behalf of the request. He stated that the gold mining operation had been going on for several weeks and had been quite successful in bringing people to the downtown area. He hoped that the City Council would allow the operation to continue in order to boost downtown business. City Council Minutes May 18, 1970 Page 5 Councilman Miller stated he was opposed to-this operation in the Mission Plaza area as he felt it distracted from the restful atmosphere of the proposed plaza. He felt that it added-a honky took feeling to this historic area of the City. He stated he was opposed to its continuance. Councilman Blake stated he thought the mining operation in San Luis Creek was a good idea and brought people downtown. He felt it was a good promotion for the Fiesta and the Mission Plaza. He stated he would support the continuance of the program. Councilman Spring stated that he would support the mining operation as long as it did not damage the bank or damage any of the improvements being made in the Plaza. Councilman Graham stated he too would support the continuance of this operation, but only on a temporary basis, as he did not feel the Mission Plaza was the place for permanent activities of this type. Mayor Schwartz stated he looked upon the promotion and existing operation with mixed feelings as the Mission Plaza was designed to be a quiet restful place in the downtown area and not to be developed for commercial exploitation which he felt could destroy the effect of the plaza. Councilman Miller stated he was still opposed to the commercial gimmick of the mining operation in the Mission Plaza. Councilman Graham stated he would support the operation if a time limit were set for the Fiesta week only. -He felt this was a good promotion for the Fiesta. Mayor Schwartz felt the merchants should have asked permission from the City Council prior to starting this operation on City property so that'it could have been discussed without pressure being imposed. Councilman Blake stated he felt the mining operation was a good promotional gimmick and was a good tourist attraction for the Mission Plaza area. On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Spring, that the City Council grant permission to operate the gold mine in San Luis Creek through: June 1970, with no provisions for air gun booths, etc. and subject to the prop- erty being restored to its original condition at the expiration of the operation. Motion carried. 10. At this time the City Council held a public hearing on the recommendation of the Planning Commission to rezone from R =2 to C -H. Lots 7, 8, 9, 10 and the south- westerly 140 feet of Lots 5 and 6 of the Imperial Addition to the City of San Luis Obispo, commonly known as-2246 thru 2276 Broad Street. .R. D. Young, Planning Director, presented the following recommendation of the Planning Commission: 1. The subject property consists of six lots 40 feet in width and 218 feet in depth. Three of the parcels are developed with residences and the balance of the property is vacant. 2. The property is bounded on the north and east by an M District and there is a contractor's office and storage yard contiguous to the north. 3. The General Plan proposes heavy commercial uses for this portion of Broad Street. It was the consensus of the Commission that the requested rezoning is in accord with the recommendations of the General Plan and the existing zoning along this portion of Broad Street. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open. R. Maddalena, realtor, appeared before the City Council urging approval of the requested rezoning as he felt it would make a good development in this general area. No one appeared before the City Council in opposition of the rezoning. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed. City Council Minutes May 18, 1970 Page 6 On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Spring, the following or- dinance was introduced. Ordinance No. 487, an ordinance amdnding the Official Zone Map of the City of San Luis Obispo. (To rezone from R -2 to C -H, 2246 thru 2276 Broad Street) Passed to print on the following roll call vote: AYES: Emmons Blake, Myron Graham, Arthur F. Spring, Donald Q. Miller, Kenneth E. Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None 11. At this time the City Council held a public hearing on the recommendation of the Planning Commission to prezone from County A -1 AH to City R -2 -S AH, R -H -S AH and C -H -S AH, Lot 25 of the San Luis Obispo Surburban Tract, commonly known as the east side of Higuera Street between Prado Road extended and Elks Lane extended. R. D. Young, Planning Director, presented the following recommendation of the Planning Commission: 1. The subject property is 9.4 acres in area. The applicant is requesting C -H zoning on 1.8 acres, R -H -S zoning on 5.2 acres and R -2 -S zoning on 2.4 acres. 2. The subject property is bounded by C-H and County A -1 AH on the north, County A -1 AH to the east and City C -H to the south. 3. The General Plan proposes heavy commercial and low to medium density residential uses for this area, with heavy commercial uses being oriented to the Higuera Street frontage. 4. The applicant proposes to annex the subject property and a 15 -acre parcel contiguous to the east. Upon annexation the 15 -acre parcel would convert to R -1 (low density residential). It is the intention of the applicant - to subdivide the subject property in conjunction with the adjoining 15 -acre parcel. 5. The Commission was of the opinion that the requested rezoning was in accord with the recommendations of the General Plan and would not conflict with the existing zone pattern. However, the Commission recommends that the Council not take final action to zone the property as recommended by the Commission until a final subdivision map has been recorded. H. Johnson,.City Attorney, commented on the recommendation of the Planning Com- mission. He stated that condition #5 was that the City Council not take action to prezone this property until the final subdivision map had been recorded. He explained the problems this might cause as follows: The City could not legally approve a tentative map for a subdivision showing lots less than the minimum size allowed in the district - hence no final map reflecting the higher density zoning could be approved until the new zoning has become effective: Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open. K. Simpson, developer, stated that his plans were to proceed with the rezoning, annexation and subdivision concurrently in order to save time on his develop- ment. He continued that he and his associates hoped to develop medium priced homes for this area. He also stated that they intended to develop this sub- division under City subdivision requirements and hoped that the City Council would approve the prezoning as recommended by the Planning Commission. ' C1ell.Whelchel, property owner, stated he was opposed to this prezoning as he felt the rezoning was not in line with the actual development of -the area. He continued that the area was developing into heavy commercial uses. He felt that if a residential development were allowed it would be extremely expensive to bus children to school as there were no schools in the general area and none were planned. Mr. Whelchel felt the area should be encouraged to develop for heavy commercial uses, or possibly a mobile home park, but should not develop for residential housing. Mayor Schwartz declared by public hearing closed. City Council Minutes May 18, 1970 Page 7 Mayor Schwartz stated that.in light of the recommendation of the Planning Com- mission to hold final .approval until.the subdivision map.had been.recorded he felt that the matter before the Council.was premature. He felt the matter should be continued until the subdivision map had been completed and the annexation completed. Councilman Miller stated he felt that the recommendation of the Planning Commis- sion was unfair to the developer as the Planning Commission or the Council should' first make some determination as to.whether residential development was compatible with the area. He felt this must be determined first. He hoped that the City Council would make this determination before the developer proceeded any further with his project. He stated he personally would vote against residential uses in this area. Councilman Spring stated he felt this area should be allowed to develop as heavy commercial and.that no residential development should be allowed to intrude upon the area. Councilman Graham felt that residential development was compatible with heavy commercial and further felt that they are necessary to support the commercial. establishments. Mayor Schwartz stated he felt the Council could take one of the following actions: 1. Deny the requested prezoning. 2. Approve the rezoning without condition #5 of the Planning Commission. 3. Continue this matter until the subdivision map has been recorded. On motion of Councilman Miller, secondedfby.Councilman Spring, that the prezon- ing as recommended by the Planning Commission be denied. Motion carried, Councilman Graham and Mayor Schwartz,:voting,no. 9:35 P.M. Mayor Schwartz declared a recess. 9:45 P.M. The meeting reconvened with all Councilmen present. Councilman Blake asked that the City Council reconsider item 11, the requested prezoning on South Higuera Street, as he did not.realize the implications of his vote. On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Miller, that the City Council rescind the previous motion denying the requested prezoning. Motion carried,,Councilman Spring voting no: On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Blake, that the requested prezoning be continued until the meeting of July 6, 1970, with the Planning Commission to study the subdivision maps and annexation proceedings. Motion carried. 12. D. F. Romero, City Engineer, presented for the Council's consideration three proposals and cost estimates to modify the storm grating at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Santa Rosa Street. Mr. Romero explained that his department had not corrected this drainage prior to this date since the street will be widened in the relatively near future and all expenses will be wasted. On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Spring, that the inter- mediate plan be adopted to modify the storm grating at an estimated cost of $210 Motion carried. 13. D. F. Romero, City Engineer, presented for the Council's consideration the proposed cooperative agreement between the City, Cal Poly and the Division of Highways,:covering the extension of Highland Drive and the construction of the new entrance road to Cal Poly. Mr. Romero reviewed the conditions outlined in the previous agreement agreed to by the City Council. 1 1 r City Council Minutes May 18, 1970 Page g H. Johnson, City Attorney, stated he had looked over the agreement and it was in order. However, he pointed out that the City would become responsible for instal- lation and maintenance of a portion of Highland Drive which is currently part of the State right -of -way. He stated that if the bids were over-the estimated.cost any and all parties could back out prior to award. He recommended that the City Council approve the agreement. On motion of Councilman. Blake, seconded by Councilman Spring, the following reso- lution was introduced. Resolution No. 2046, a resolution approving the agreement for the extension of Highland Drive. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Emmons Blake, Myron Graham, Arthur F. Spring, Donald Q. Miller, Kenneth E. Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None 14. At this time the City Council considered Item 70 -5 -11T from the Traffic Committee Report of May 11, 1970. 70- 5 -11T. Mr. Romero has presented to the traffic committee a suggested plan for channelization of traffic on Johnson south of San Luis Drive which would provide for a turning pocket for southbound motorists on Johnson turning left on to Lizzie and would provide for a four foot pedestrian walkway alongside the east side of Johnson past the Bilodeau residence. This would be accom- plished by moving the street centerline striping to the west and by deleting both the dividing line between the two northbound lanes of traffic and the limit of the pedestrian walkway with a solid white line. We agree with his proposal and recommend approval. ' D. F. Romero, City Engineer, explained advantages and disadvantages inherent in the proposal as submitted, stating that this channelization would be a temporary measure which would alleviate some problems but that the permanent answer in- volved widening of the street. Councilman Spring stated he was opposed to this proposal as he felt it.:was unfair:. to motorists to squeeze the traffic lanes so close together. Also he felt it would be a safety hazard to pedestrians as a false sense of security would be obtained with the walkway. He felt that the City should condemn the property on Johnson in-.this area in order to acquire the needed easement for full widening of the street. Councilman Miller stated he was also opposed to the proposal as he felt it was unfair. He felt the City should acquire the land for.the. widening and proceed on that basis. Councilman Blake stated he felt the proposal was no answer to the traffic problem and would only provide a false sense of security for the pedestrians using-the walkway. Mayor Schwartz stated he did not feel that the striping of a pedestrian way was an answer for the adequate protection of pedestrians. On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Spring, the recommen- dation of the Traffic Committee was disapproved. ' 15. Communication from K. F. Kundert, M. D., requesting a resolution for modi- fication of the Los Osos Road and 101 interchange south of San Luis Obispo. D. F. Romero, City Engineer, explained.that the mal request from the City prior to entering into interchange. Since the City',s Master Plan calls W connect to Buckley Road and since..the Kundert the final design, it would be worthwhile for the studies on this project at an early date. Division of Highways needed.a for - studies for modification of an for extension of Los Osos Road developments are dependent upon Division of Highways to commence City Council Minutes May 18, 1970 Page 9: On motion of Councilman Spring, seconded by Councilman Blake, the following reso- lution was introduced: Resolution No. 2047, a resolution requesting that the Division of Highways commence studies for modification:.of the Los Osos Road at Highway 101 Interchange. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Emmons Blake, Myron Graham, Arthur F. Spring, Donald Q. Miller, Kenneth-E. Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None 16. Councilman Graham, member of the Council committee (Miller & Graham) ap- pointed to meet with Norman Stone regarding a human action program for the City requested that their report on this matter be continued. 17. Communication from the Planning Commission requesting that the City Council grant them additional funds in the amount of $875 to allow members of the Com- mission to attend a League of California Cities sponsored Planning Institute in Anahiem, California from June 3 to 5, 1970. At the time the 1969 -70 Budget was approved this conference had not been organized. The Planning Commission felt this conference was worthwhile and hoped the Council would concur and grant them the additional funds. On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Mayor Schwartz, that,.the City approve the request for four Planning Commissioners to attend the Planning Institute. On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Mayor Schwartz, the following reso- lution was introduced. Resolution No. 2040, a resolutibn increasing the'1969 -70 Budget. (Increase General Government Account by $750.00 and decrease Unbudgeted Reserve by $750.00) Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Emmons Blake, Myron Graham, Arthur F. Spring, Donald Q. Miller, Kenneth E. Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None 18. Councilman Graham suggested that the City Council consider an amendment to Ordinance No. 485, an ordinance revising the business license fees. He felt that Section 6100.19 should be amended so that people with four apartments or less would only be required to pay a $10.00 license fee, and apartment owners with five or more units be required to pay a license fee of $25.00. No action was taken by the Council to amend this ordinance. 19. Councilman Graham suggested that the City Council consider amending Ordinance No. 486, an ordinance providing for mandatory solid waste collection. He suggested that the ordinance be amended.-to allow senior citizens to file an affidavit with the City Clerk which would allow them a 15- gallon can at $1.75 per month, rather than the $2.50 charge for a 35T-gallon can.. He felt that the senior citizens did not generate enough garbage to fill a 35- gallon can each week. Also, he felt.it would place a hardship on them as they could not afford to pay $2.50. Councilman Blake suggested that the City Council allow the ordinance to go into effect as it was presently written to see how the mandatory requirements work out. After a period of time the ordinance could be adjusted to handle any prob- lems that might arise. No action was taken by the City Council to amend the ordinance. City Council Minutes Page 10 May 18, 1970 20. D. F. Romero, City Engineer, requested that the third alternate to the Woodbridge or South Street crossing of the Southern Pacific Railroad be continued. 21. H. Johnson, City Attorney, presented for the Council's consideration the final agreement for the completion of the off -site improvements in Tract 292. It was explained that the cash amounts called for in the agreement have already been deposited by the bonding company and Mr. Skinner and that the City Engineer ' would have control over any payments out of this fund. In return for the cash deposits, it was pointed out that the bond waved be reduced to approximately $14,000. On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Miller, the Mayor was authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the City.. Motion carried.. 22. H. Johnson, City Attorney, brought to the Council's attention the request of the City Librarian that the Council oppose Senate Bill 3842 which would eliminate the exemption presently enjoyed by libraries for reduced postal rates for books. H. Johnson stated that the City Librarian, Miss Pat Clark, felt this could be a financial hardship for the library. Councilman Blake stated he would object to any action by the Council to oppose this bill as he felt the libraries should be required to pay the going rate for parcel post, as everyone complained about the Post:O ffice Department, but everyone wanted special considerations for postage. He felt the Library and City could afford to pay the extra postage. Councilman Miller agreed with Councilman Blake's statement that the City should not take action to oppose this bill. No action was taken to oppose the Senate Bill. ' 23. H. Johnson, City Attorney, brought to the Council's attention an agreement proposed by the City for reimbursement from the Department of Housing and Urban Development for a portion of the cost required for the development of South Side Park. On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Graham, the Mayor was authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the City. 24. H. Johnson, City Attorney, presented for the Council's consideration a. resolution providing for emergency regulations to preserve the peace and order of the City of San Luis Obispo and calling attention to procedures for violation thereof. H. Johnson stated that a similar ordinance had recently been passed by the County Board of Supervisors. He felt that while these laws were included in the City Ordinance and State law, he recommended that the Council consider. adoption of this resolution as everything would be spelled out in case of problems. The City Council deferred action on this proposed resolution because they had not: had an opportunity to study. it. The. matter was continued until June 1. 25. Charles Delmartini, President of the La Fiesta Association, appeared before the City Council requesting the following: 1. A resolution of the City Council authorizing the closing of Highway 227 to Broad Street and the closing of Highway 101 offramp at Marsh Street during the hours of 6:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. on May 23, 1970. 2. A moratorium on parking enforcement in downtown San Luis Obispo on May 25th. 3. Twenty (20) parking exemption stickers for Fiesta officials during the week of May 18 -20, 1970. The Council took the following action. City Council Minutes May 18, 1970 Page 11 On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by- Councilman Miller, the following reso- lution was introduced. Resolution No. 2045, a resolution approving the closing of State highway for La Fiesta Parade May 23, 1970. Passed and adopted on'the following roll call vote: AYES: Emmons Blake, Myron Graham, Arthur F. Spring, Donald Q. Miller, Kenneth E. Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by on parking enforcement in downtown San Luis proved.. Motion carried. On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by tion stickers were denied. Motion carried, 26. The Los Rancheros Riding and Roping C1i sell beer during the gymkhana to be held at On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by approved. Councilman Miller, the moratorium Obispo for May 25, 1970 was ap- Mayor Schwartz, the parking exemp- Councilman Graham voting no. .ib requested Council permission to Laguna Lake Park on May 23 &24, 1970. Councilman Graham, the request was 27. D. F. Romero, City Engineer, stated he had been approached by Edra Smith, Edna Road, for permission to connect her property to the City sewer system. She also asked Mr. Romero if.it would be possible for her to pay the connection charges over a period of years, rather than one lump sum. The matter was continued to June'l, 1970 for a written request on the matter. 28. Communication from the Downtown Association regarding the 1972 Bicentennial Celebration to be held in San Luis Obispo was referred to the Council's budget study. ' 29. Councilman Miller requested Council permission to attend a League of Calif- ornia Cities Transportation Committee meeting on May 27, 1970 to be held at E1 Segundo. The request was approved on motion of Councilman Blake seconded by Councilman Spring. 30. Communication from the San Luis Obispo County Development Association and San Luis Obispo Realtors and Developers Association requesting that the City Council continue their support of the County Development Association was re- ferred to the Council's budget study. 31. On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Miller, the meeting adjourned to Tuesday, May 19, 1970 at 12 :00 Noon, for continued -study of the 1970 -71 Budget. ,w .! APPROVED: June 15, 1970 1