HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/04/1971L'
1
Pledge
Roll Call
Present
City Staff
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA
January 4, 1971 - 7:00 P. M.
City Hall .
Emmons Blake, Myron Graham, Donald Q. Miller,
Arthur F. Spring, Kenneth E. Schwartz
Present: R. D. Young, Planning Director; J. H. Fitzpatrick,
.City Clerk; W. Flory, Park and Recreation Supervisor;
H. Johnson, City Attorney; R. D. Miller, Administrative
Officer; D. F. Romero, City Engineer; L. Schlobohm,
Fire Chief; E. L. Rodgers, Police Chief; E.P. Thompson,
Water.Department Director..
C -1. The City Council approved the minutes of November 16 and 23, 1970.
C -2. The City Council authorized payment of claims against the City subject
to the authorization of the Administrative Officer.
C -3. The City-Council considered continuation of the lease between the City
and Jessie H. Ray for the Mini -Park at Hutton and High Streets. The Mayor was
authorized to sign the agreement and the Park and Recreation Department was
asked to coordinate the clean up of the park by the student group.
C -4. The Council received a communication from Alex Madonna regarding lands-
caping for the west side of Madonna Road on City property at his expense to
enhance the entrance to Madonna Inn.
Mayor Schwartz stated it was his understanding that the Martinelli property
interests were again interested in placing a service station on the property
adjacent to the City owned property and he felt that if the property owners
had new information for use of the City owned property, they should be allowed
to present it to the City Council so that it could be considered.
Paul Davis, attorney for the Martinelli property interests, asked that they be
considered in any meeting with.Alex Madonna regarding the City owned property
lying between the Madonna property and the Martinelli property. He continued
that regardless of what had been said in the past, it was his feeling after a
look at the records that this City owned property was really a City street and
that his client had the right to use the land for any development (including a
service station) that he desired. Further, all his client wished from the City
was a permit on the property for a curb opening for access to the service
station. He also stated that his client would be willing to landscape the
balance of the City owned property in exchange for the curb cut and access
through City owned property.
P. Davis stated that all the property owners wanted was the Council to allow
access through the City owned property to the service station.
Mayor Schwartz reviewed for the public past actions of the City Council and
Planning Commission in regard to a service station for this site and also
requests by the property owners for use of City owned property in order to
make access to the station reasonable. He stated that for the record he wished
it stated that the Martinelli.interest now'only asked for access over City
property to Madonna Road 'and not additional land, nor did they any longer wish
access over City property to the Madonna Inn access road.
City Council Minutes
January 4, 1971
Page 2
H. Johnson, City Attorney, stated that the Martinelli property proposed to be
devoted to service station use already has frontage on and access to a major
public street, namely Madonna Road, so the request by the property owner to
have vehicular access across portions of property not presently part of the
traveled way of the frontage road constitutes an application for additional -
driveways which can be considered in the light of the safety considerations at
the intersection and either approved or disapproved at the Council's discretion.
Councilman Graham stated that if the City granted access over City property to
Martinelli that this property owner then should be requested to landscape the
balance of the City owned property that would not be paved for access to the
service station.
Councilman Blake objected to any.action by the City Council or any discussion
of the matter without getting a recommendation for or against this proposal
from the Planning Commission.
Councilman Miller agreed, stating that the City Council should not discuss the
matter until the Planning Commission had concluded its hearings on the request
without prejudicing the.proposal by premature discussion.
The matter was continued to January 11, 1971 for discussion.
C -5.. The City Council ordered the report from the Design Review Board that a
recommendation would soon be presented concerning the Visual Arts Guild ,
received and filed.
C -6. The City Council granted a one -month extension of the contract with
Heatherwood Landscaping for the street tree planting project.
C -7. The City Council approved the following contract payments:
Burke Construction Co. Est. #3 $2,923,93
Santa Rosa St. Widening
City Plan 11 -70
J. A. O'Kell.ey & Son Est. #3 $ 277.20
Johnson Ave. Widening
City Plan 27 -70
J. A. O'Kelley & Son Est. #4 $ 985.08
Johnson Ave. Widening Final
City Plan 27 -70
C. S. Construction Co. Est. #3 $7,606.60
Street Reconstruction
& Resurfacing
City Plan Nos. 8 -71, 9 -71, & 10 -71
Heatherwood Landscaping Est. #1 $190181.00
Street Tree Planting
City Plan 3 -71
C -8. The City Council approved the following change.order:
C. S. Construction Company $2,081.00
Street Reconstruction &
Resurfacing Project
City Plan Nos. 8 -71, 9 -71, & 10 -71
C -9. The City Council received a communication from the County Purchasing
Agent regarding the joint agreement between City and County for purchase of
petroleum products. The communication and bid summary were ordered filed.
City Council Minutes
January 4,1971
Page 3
C -10. The City Clerk presented the following report on bids received for
supplying chemicals for the calendar year 1971: (See EXHIBIT "A!' attached)
E. P. Thompson, Water Department.Director, recommended that the contract for
Chlorine be awarded to Georgia Pacific Corporation as they had given good
service on this last year's contract.
Councilman Blake felt that the City Council should award the chlorine bid to
the Paso Robles Seed and Chemical Comp any. as they were a -IocaI County firm.
Councilman Graham felt that the County firm should be considered particularly
when the two bids were identical.
Councilman Spring agreed that the Paso Robles firm should get.preference over
an out-of-town company.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Spring, that the
chemical bids be accepted from the.lowest bidder in each case, except in the
case of the CHLORINE BID which will be granted to the Paso Robles Seed and
Chemical Company. Motion carried.
C -11. Communi cat ion. from Ready Realty expressing the interest of Bear Valley
Development Company (L. J. Morganti, etal) in annexation of their property
to the City, was referred to the Planning Director for inclusion in an annex-
ation survey.
All consent items were approved as indicated.on motion.of Councilman Graham,
seconded by Councilman Miller.
1. Communication from the Promotional Coordinating Committee recommending to
the City Council that Lee Walters Advertising be granted the 1971 advertising
and promotion contract for the City of San Luis Obispo.
Thomas G. Smith, Chairman of the Promotional Coordinating Committee, appeared
before the City Council and explained the steps the Committee followed in order
to arrive at their recommendation to the City Council.
Councilman Miller thanked the Committee for a
he was aware of.the time and effort -spent by
recommendation. He felt that the Promotional
sional approach in developing their proposal.
vote against awarding the contract as he felt
for other needs of the community.
job well done as he stated that
this Committee in arriving at this
Committee had used a very profes-
However, he continued, he would
.the funds could be better used
Councilman Blake stated he, too, appreciated the efforts put forth by the Pro-
motional Coordinating Committee in arriving at the recommendation to the City
Council for an agency to represent the City.and to promote the Community.
On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Graham, that the City
Council accept the recommendation of the Promotional Coordinating Committee
and award the contract to Lee Walters Advertising. Motion carried with
Councilman Miller voting no.
2. Dudley Winterhalder, Executive Secretary of the City Housing Authority,
appeared before the City Council to present a report on the acquisition by the
City Housing Authority of the County Housing property on South.Street and High
Street. He stated that the City Housing Authority had proposed a new develop-
ment for the High Street property which had been approved.by HUD, Plans and
specifications have been approved and all that was needed to push this develop-
ment ahead was for the City Housing Authority to purchase the property from the
County Housing Authority.
He continued that any tenants put out of the High Street units because of the
demolition and building of the new development would be placed on top priority
for City units.
City Council Minutes
January 4, 1971
Page 4
Upon the purchase of the High.Street land, the City Housing Authority would
then assume management of the South Street units and would hope to complete
the purchasing contract with the County.
Upon questioning by the City Council, Mr. Winterhalder listed the following
priorities that must be met in order to occupy a low rent housing unit in the
City:
1. Six months' residency in the City.
2. Families without any housing.
3. Families-about to lose their housing because of eviction, fire, etc.
4. Families living in substandard dwellings.
5. Families paying unreasonable rents.
6. Families of a disabled veteran.
7. Families of a deceased veteran.
8. Families of veterans.
9. Other citizens in need.
Councilman Spring asked why the City Housing Authority allowed newcomers to
the City who met the priorities to get new units when people who had lived in
the City for many years could not get into one of the units.
D. Winterhalder answered that each applicant for a Housing Authority unit must
meet the criteria established for residency and the other items listed previous -
ly.by him. He also stated that the City and County Housing Authorities had
agreed on the disposal of all County owned housing units in the City but so
far the exchange of property and purchase by the City was tied up in HUD await-
ing approval of the financing of the purchase.
Mayor Schwartz thanked D. Winterhalder for the report on the progress of the
Housing Authority. .
3. Communication from the Design Review Board recommending that the City
Council adopt a program of painting all the signal, light and sign standards
throughout the City in the same color as was used by this committee on an
experimental basis at the intersection of Chorro and Monterey Streets:
L. Schlobohm, Fire Chief; asked that the fire hydrants be exempted from the
painting proposal as they became difficult to locate if they blended in with
adjacent items. He continued that the Fire Department was studying a paint-
ing program that it felt would not be objectionable to the City..
D. F. Romero, City Engineer, objected to the proposed repainting of.all public
facilities, particularly, he wished consideration of the natural wood poles
that were being put in and the unpainted aluminum poles. He.also mentioned
the feeling of the State to the City painting State facilities on State
highways.
Councilman Blake suggested that thy':program be accepted and approved but that
the repainting be done on a normal maintenance schedule and not on a crash
program of painting all these facilities as rapidly as possible.
It was the common consent of the Council that the City proceed on a normal
maintenance basis to the new color scheme and not on State routes, and only
on items that would normally be painted.
4. Communication from the Design Review Board that they had again.rejected
the presentation by the Soroptimist Club.
"We (the Design Review Board) have reviewed, for the second time, the presen-
tation by the Soroptimist Club to.-have a water wheel constructed in the rear
of the Murray Adobe in the Mission Plaza.
Our rejection of the above mentioned proposal is based on the following:
1. We feel that this water wheel does not have that'much historic
value to warrant reconstruction at this site. A scale model
placed in the Museum would be a possible solution.
City Council Minutes
January 4, 1971
Page 5
2. The exact size and design of the wheel is unknown.
3. The proposed location of the wheel would create a.restriction
of the Plaza pedestrian flow and use in that area.
4. Water would have to be piped up to run this wheel and would
appear very unrealistic.
' Councilman Blake stated that at the request of the Soroptimist Club, he asked
that this matter would be continued so that the Soroptimist Club could make
a presentation for placing the wheel in the Plaza.
Councilman Spring stated that he rejected the recommendation of the Design
Review Board.
Councilman Graham asked that the matter be continued so that the Soroptimist
Club could be heard on the matter.
The matter was continued.
5. Communication from Paragon Homes requesting Council approval and accep-
tance of Tract 374. The request was referred to the City Engineer for final
inspection and was continued to the meeting of January 18, 1971.
6. At this time the City Council held a public hearing on the recommendation
of the Planning Commission to amend the Zoning Ordinance regarding the reduc-
tion of INTERIOR YARD SET BACKS.
R. D. Young, Planning Director, presented the recommendation of the Planning
Commission as they felt it was inconsistent with the intent of a high density
district and that strict adherence to the recommendation would make it very
difficult to develop a large number of residential lots that were properly
zoned. The Planning Commission also felt that this amendment would provide
' more flexibility of design and make it more feasible to develop multiple
zoned lots with an average width of 50 to 60'feet.
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open.
No one appeared before the City Council for or against the proposed amendment.
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Mayor Schwartz, the following
ordinance was introduced. ORDINANCE NO. 513, an ordinance amending the
zoning ordinance to reduce interior side yard setbacks on lots of record less
than 60 feet in width and zoned for multiple family use prior to January 1, 1971.
Passed to print on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Emmons Blake, Myron Graham, Arthur F. Spring,
Kenneth E. Schwartz
NOES: Donald Q. Miller
ABSENT: None
7. At this time the City Council held a public hearing on the recommendation
' of the Planning Commission to amend the Major Streets and Highways Plan of the
City of San Luis Obispo by adding the route from Madonna Road and Higuera Street
to South Street.
D. F. Romero, City Engineer, explained that the proposed addition involved ex-
tension of Madonna Road from Higuera Street to South Street, in accordance with
the recommendation of the Planning Commission.
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open.
City Council Minutes
January 4, 1971
Page 6
Bob Barrows, 870 Meinecke Street, questioned the proposed change as he felt
that it would take out a number of improvements and he did not believe the loss
of the improvements would be justified by the ease for the motorist.
Mayor Schwartz stated that this was a long -range plan and there were no plans
for immediate acquisition of the property but this proposal was for future trans-
portation needs fifteen to twenty years away.
John Hogan, 411 Branch Street, asked if South Street were to be a four land
roac and also would it be possible to have access to South Street if one owned
property that went through from South to Branch.
D. F. Romero replied that a number of years ago the City Council had determined
that access would be permitted from all properties fronting South Street.
Charles Long, Village Motel & Mobile Home Park, 145 South Street, asked what
would happen to his property when and if the street was put through.
D. F. Romero answered that the property would be acquired by purchase with full
knowledge by the property owner but he again reminded Mr. Long that this was
a long -range plan and he doubted if the City would be acquiring property for
many years.
Mayor Schwartz declared.the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Spring, the following
resolution was introduced. RESOLUTION NO. 2140, a resolution modifying the
Street and Highway Plan.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Emmons Blake, Myron Graham, Arthur F. Spring,
Kenneth E. Schwartz
NOES: Donald Q. Miller
ABSENT: None
8. D. F. Romero, City Engineer, presented for the Council's consideration
plans and specifications for the traffic signal installation at Madonna Road
and Higuera Street. He explained the scope of the work to be accomplished
under the contract and the traffic control methods to be employed. He
estimated that the cost.of construction would be $21,000.
On motion of Mayor Schwartz, seconded by Councilman Graham, that the Council
approve the plans and specifications and authorize preparation prior to
approval of a call for bids. Motion lost on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Myron Graham, Kenneth E. Schwartz
NOES: Emmons Blake, Donald Q. Miller, Arthur F. Spring
ABSENT: None
On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Spring, that the City
Engineer prepare specifications and be authorized to call for bids as soon
as plans and specifications are completed. Motion carried.
9. D. F. Romero, City Engineer, requested that the City Council consider
retaining Paul Adamson, consulting engineer, to up -date the previous sewer
study prepared by him for the Los Osos and Edna Valleys. The City Engineer
continued that.with the City's interest in these two areas outside the City,
he felt that the City Council should have up -dated cost studies for their
consideration.
The matter was continued for further discussion and the City Engineer was
authorized to procure a proposal from Paul Adamson for up- dating these two
studies.
J
1
1
City Council Minutes
January 4, 1971
Page 7
10. Communication from the State Department of Public Works regarding action
by the Federal Highway Administrator revising the standards in the Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control Devices whereby yellow. lines would delineate the separ
ation of traffic in opposing directions which means that center line markings
on two lane - two way roads would be yellow. The California Traffic Control
Device Committee adopted the recommendation of the Federal Highway Administrator
regarding this recommendation for yellow lines on'two way roads and they
' recommended that all local agencies in the State conform to the January 1973
schedule of converting center lines to yellow on subject streets.
On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Miller, the following
resolution was introduced. RESOLUTION NO 2143, a resolution approving the
recommendation of the California Division of Highways that yellow lines
delineate the separation of traffic on opposing direction.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Emmons Blake, Myron Graham, Donald Q. Miller,
Arthur F. Spring, Kenneth E. Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
11. Communication from H. Johnson, City Attorney, reporting on the research
regarding the formation of a transportation commission to serve the County of
San Luis Obispo. It was his opinion that in order to be feasible a regional
or county -wide transportation commission or group should be formed and the
special legislation enacted by the State of California to give life to the
commission by establishing jurisdiction, tax powers, etc.
Councilman Miller recommended that the City of San Luis Obispo take a lead in
organizing a county -wide or regional transportation commission so that a com-
plete integrated transportation program could be developed for the county.
The matter was referred to the County Mayors' Association for discussion.
12. TRAFFIC COMMITTEE REPORT of December 18, 1970.
70- 12 =1C. The Traffic Committee has considered the recommendations of the
Police Chief regarding ground rules for parades. The Committee agrees in
general with the provisions regarding desirable times and routings but feels
that there may be exceptions with merit. In particular we don't feel too
strongly about prohibiting rallies downtown in connection with the parades but
whenever possible, we think the blocking off of streets should be discouraged.
70- 12 -2T. In connection with the proposed traffic signals at Madonna and
Higuera and tak.ing into consideration the dramatic increases in traffic flows
and resultant congestion along lower Higuera Street, the Traffic Committee
recommends that all curb parking along Higuera between High Street and Madonna
Road be eliminated where it is not already prohibited. Since this is a rather
far - reaching change, we suggest that the Council schedule a public hearing on
the matter if the Council feels that the recommendation has merit.
70- 12 -3T. It is recommended that the City Engineer be authorized to order street
lighting for the intersections of Los Osos Road and Prefumo Canyon Road and Los
Osos Road and Laguna Road.
70- 12 -4T. The Planning and Building Department has been working with the City
Attorney in attempting to work up some type of simplified "citation" procedure
to eliminate service station sign violations. However, we are advised that the
Attorney does not consider this practical. A series of formal criminal com-
plaints will apparently be required to obtain enforcement through the courts or
injunctions which are issued only after long involved legal procedures. It
should be noted, however, that final warning letters are now in the mail from
the City Attorney which may produce the desired results.
City Council Minutes
January 4, 1971
Page 8
Thes final warning letters were prepared Wednesday, Thursday and Friday of
this week after receipt of a letter dated December 14 from the Planning
Department referring the matter to the City Attorney. As a different approach
it is suggested that the Council think about some type of "jaw bone" approach
to discourage violatiors, accompanied by appropriate publicity. This would of
course be backed up by legal enforcement procedures. The City Attorney be-
lieves that minor revisions to the present ordinance would permit costs of
summary abatement of non - conforming signs as well as abandoned and non-
current signs to be charged to the property owner. However, it must be rec-
ognized that, in some cases, the oil company is merely a lessee so this
would necessitate notice to the property owner as well as the oil company
at all stages of the proceedings.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Graham, the recommen-
dations of the Traffic Committee were accepted. Motion carried.
13. Communication from the City of San Leandro urging that the City of San
Luis Obispo concur in a recommendation to the State Legislature that all
motor vehicles in California be required to carry safety warning flares in
case of accident.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Graham, the following
resolution was introduced. RESOLUTION NO. 2139, a resolution urging State
Legislature to enact mandatory automobile safety flare legislation.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Emmons Blake, Myron Graham, Donald Q. Miller,
Arthur F. Spring, Kenneth E. Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
14. Communication from Richard B. Taylor, landscape architect for Mission
Plaza, stating that to revise the drawings of the restroom building in Mission
Plaza Phase II to include building plan elevations, sketches, details, etc.,
in order to provide a 3' 4" plumbing access space between the mens' and
womens' sides of the building, the cost for revisions would be $750.
R. D. Young, Planning Director, recommended that the City accept the Mission
Plaza Phase II plans as approved by the subcommittee and suggested that the
architect not be requested to modify restroom, and that this be done by the
City staff.
The Council agreed that the City staff should modify the plans with no extra
work to be done by the architect.
15. The City Council adjourned to executive session to discuss property
acquisition involving litigation.
16. On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Graham, the meet-
ing adjourned to 7:30 P.M., Monday, January 11, 1971.
"' ATRICK, CITY CLERK
APPROVED: February 1, 1971
1
1
-u G) 1 -00 W
0) (D O 0) (D 'Z
C) O n O d
_. 3 (D - -I 3
n d n 0) Z
I I O
3
(D
O O O c 0 0 0
O O O + Q S O
N N N { ca- -
T U) (7) 3
X Q
O a
y — n--hN
I^ m (D L
O m
A �O A -I (D CD (D N
p 3 r -•
00 (p O 3 (D c <
(� O O O d- N
N d
D_ W
�J OaOO
N
EA EA 6q N O c
J C% -I 0 3 1
J O J X (D 3 -•
A O A N N
d d S
C 0 3
0) O (n
N; CD: A C)
(r� to 6v O N c
hill �O Vl O J + 3"
y.A O A S O
C) 01
O) -
— Z;
— (D
Kl 69 EA
N W N co O
J N V d 0
W N W —
N W
O% O O
O O O
A
(D
3
or
7
N
O AO
N N
03
+N@ O
0-
0 00
OON
K u'13,�
CL
N
N
O co O
n CO 0
obi d
0-0 Q
N O N S
--
- X —
X + (D
C� +
(D (D
3
O _0 0)
N J N
0 N N —•
3 D 0) ()
J
D J O C)
3< C) —•
l_n Lo -
Ul W Q)
(D (D T. 1+
(7 (D
.. l -
-1 7 0) -.
D (D
n. N
() c (O C)
n
o
m m --
CD w
3 n
Q.
v -+ —
(n p
D
W 0
((D .0
0-0
A S
(D •
-• O
(D
+
<
d
-•
l0 N +
'
O O
O
O
O
0
-u G) 1 -00 W
0) (D O 0) (D 'Z
C) O n O d
_. 3 (D - -I 3
n d n 0) Z
I I O
3
(D
O O O c 0 0 0
O O O + Q S O
N N N { ca- -
T U) (7) 3
X Q
O a
y — n--hN
I^ m (D L
O m
A �O A -I (D CD (D N
p 3 r -•
00 (p O 3 (D c <
(� O O O d- N
N d
D_ W
�J OaOO
N
EA EA 6q N O c
J C% -I 0 3 1
J O J X (D 3 -•
A O A N N
d d S
C 0 3
0) O (n
N; CD: A C)
(r� to 6v O N c
hill �O Vl O J + 3"
y.A O A S O
C) 01
O) -
— Z;
— (D
Kl 69 EA
N W N co O
J N V d 0
W N W —
N W
O% O O
O O O
A
(D
3
or
7
N
m
X
2
W
D
m m m
r - <
co
O O
O rn
U)
U)
(n
0
0 0
W
(D
S D
D ME
(n m
co
m
Q
CT O
(+D
—x
—
-I
CD
(D
(D W U)
U)
J to
cn O
7 Po
l7 Cn
c
CD
0 -•;7
D
(D
D (D O
n
cn
(D —•
co (D
Po
(D
O W
Q) Ln
c-)
O n
A
=r
O 7
O C)
N
3
W
n
(D
0
O
(n A r
c- � <
co
O O
O rn Z5
H
n
W
(D
S D
D f
-
N a N
(OD (+D
+ -•
-I
(D 7 (D
(D w N
N N
(n O
7 Po
0 (n 0
c
D +:D-
0 -•;7
D N
CD 3
(a
(D —•
W (D
o + n
(D -i
O W
�o 0) UI
N —
O n
OJ
O :T
O C)
N
O
W �
n
U) — -n -I W
d O C7 O O
CD
(D z
� v
m
o + m
vWi
(D Ul \-n n_
N
O O O O
=3 n 7 7 [-F
+ -
UI U) N U)
aO
LO -+, a-
0 (n a
d U1
O c
- (D r (D
A A A n_ C n
O. W (n -
O (.n A 7 O O N
-o O
3 O Z
to Z 6v (n c
N N O N Ol
OJ N (D N X (D 7 n-
O N N (n c O L
0) 0 -•
G O 7
a cn
A 7
C) (n
(D O
n
(OD Efl 6q N � i d
-• N -i (D + D
-• S N
(D N A -1(n
3 O N O O= n
(D O 7 + fl r
O_ - -
fi +
O
+
O
f O
o, O A O -
(-A t» to w
J J J J
O N N A -1 +
O J �o J In d
O V O V1
(n m 3 N N D (n + ig N
Ol X Ol (D N N O S O) (D O
— 0 X 7 NI- NI- X 7 1 70
nn c (D + + (D B (D -+ O 3
(
CL x O O U) (D x 0�
D U) Z)
N + - Ol W. T.
X(O a(D 7 � N - a CD N
(D U) -• at O (D Ut -0
n _0 c c i
1
1
1
1
m
x
S
W
D
r -• <
O W N
N Q` =3
w
D :E
D V) 0)
(o O +
(D (D
N O
� 7 d
7 7
D (D
Z7
(DO
m (n
On
o=7N
N
W �
d
n
(D
N
O
N
O
N
ba
N
J
A
O
69
w
J
J
N
(D
I
(D
CL
EA
N
J
Ul
O
EA
W
W
O
A
O
O
m cn
x a
C) -
-(D
c N
CL
(D --j
CL Cl)
X
N N a
O 00 a
N
O W O
Q O Q
- x -
(D N
N J N
J
J U
(7 (D
D (D
a
w
w n
� C
A N
U s
n
d
C)
O
Q <
z m
d
0)
N
3
c
N
(O f
d
(D d
'O
I +
O
N (D
=3
I
N
o-( .o
EA
10
N
�n
c
O
0
n -
D!
'O
-(D
O
7
=3
0
O
+
o-( .o
(n
N --i
N
O
0
N
O
+
O. 7
- -
<
N
r
n 0
c
O f
a�N
n�
a O
0
bq
m
N v
c Q
Ni
(D Z7
�n
-3 v
O N
-• a
O
+
-0-0
Ll N
-i (D
(D O
(D
O
(D -
6 N
n =3
O n
B (D
W d
(D -
n
N <
O n
+ (D
00
-a-
LO
i
n
N
a
v
O O
xm
=
= -I
u
N
n
-
O
(D
h
C-
, c
7 -• + 7
c + O -.
d S N
O
0 m
-I +
CD
(D
< n =-
-
i (D
O (D
-•
A - to
<
(D
- n
(D
O
-•I(n
c +
n
(D
�o O -c
d
J �
- O
EA
N
(D -
�n
x a
O
0
n -
+
'O
-(D
O
O
=3
W
W
N --i
N
O
d N
O
-
O
O
O
m (n
x a
m
n -
-(D
c N
d
77
N --i
N
0-0)
x
1
7
J
°-'
o� m
0 Qn 0
w
00))
0
N N
c .P N
N Cl :0 C_
O 00
O
W
3
� D
D g N
co
�(D
-
Q Q
aa)i n
CD (+D
— X —
-+ - • —
-I
(D (D
(D =; (D
(D CO N
N J N
•• (D N
N O
J
�
3 po
ll) N
Ci U)
a
CD
D =r
O
D (D
-i (D
D (D
O
�•
(D
W N
ID 0) N
W (7
N —
O n
.p =r
OD
O S
O
7
rn 3
O
L'i -D
n
o
o
N
n
—
(D
0
O
1
7
J
W
oC
O
3
0)
N
(C :E
�
a
(D 0)
S
-F
O
N (D
N
7
N
O
O
O
0
m
O
O
O
—(n0
-•
O =
N
N
N
=
d 0
n
£
—
O
m
—
N (o
x
cy
O
S
N
N
N
IN
(D x
O C-
u
u
m
O
11 0)
N
—
co
A
u
-F
Q
(D
-
W
_�
O
C_ N n
.
O
O
O7
0 (D
W G (D
-• C_
-
a O
D
by
fA
EA
b4
U)
N
0)
O1
N
O
W
U
0)
1
O (n
7
X (D
'O 0)
(D
N
N
N
(D 7
C)
_
U
7 C
(D r z
a c �
W N N
=r
p
�'
(D
o
CD
(D
(D
-i
a' C
—
N
—
—
(D
— co
-0 N
(D
O
(D
(D
0
3 0
C
(D
(D
C F
d
N
(D
(D
-•
N
d
C_
C_
L 7
N
O
7 0)
C n
�
m n
s
O
0
G -1
N
ER
EA
Efa
69
-0
d
?
Lr
�
O
O
-1
O
=
U4
(n
n
+
io
- m
(D
o
LA
o
O
�o
N
O
7
J
b9
Hi
b4
�
u
O
.n
v
co 0
N
-•
N
07
O
d 0
O
O
W
O
—
J
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
p
m
X
-• N 0)
0) -•
0)
(D
n
(D X
X 3
X
3
c
3
(D
(D
a
c
x v
x
x-
-
3 -+
n )
n
N
D
— -f
—
(a
0
a
1 O-0 a
7
d
O 0) —
C_ a
n
x
:3 Q —
m
—n
—
n (D o)
N Q
<
— F —
(D
-• N (D
5
CD (D a
(D
Z S
N
1
7
J
1
m
x
2
m
D
-0 _0 -0
Ol Ol
(n m
O 00
TJ Z7
O co O
0- O a'
—x —
(D
In J N
• J
n (D
D (D
n
W ()
A =r
A 0)
m 3.
n
O7
n
O
po <
0)
ZJ D
(n a
(D 0)
U) CD
(D
Ln
Ln
PUM
O
Z3
U)
W
J
N
..
W
rn
W
(D
(D
I
N
O.
J
N
lJt
O
4a
W
O
D1
A
A
O
m
x
n
c
CL
7
N
0)
(D
-F
or
x
F-
O W o
U) O 7
D W 0)
(n O -F
(D D (D
—Z -s
(D -• N
Ln CD
Qo
W
C7 (D Z7
D d O
n (D
D- O
Z
�O-0 N
O -
O 0)
N n
W (D
0)
c
(D
m
O
O
7
N
69
W
O
J
Er+
W
(!1 69
O N
�o O
O O
LoN -D m
0 W 7 - -•
c Unn- C.
c -• n
m3 N N (D
1 O -F n '7
d -
-F - 0
n(n m C
-• o — m
n
O s n
G (D 0)
C7 (n -
D� n C7
1 0) O
(D - -i
07 N -0
A O
O <
A .
Z co
O) �
N 7
CL
Co
c
64
O
d
7
N -I
(D
f
lIt
0
� 0
:3
+
O a) O
O
N
1 :3 O -
-I
J
c -
10
o r O
-• c n f
0 N D 7
bq
V1
(D .'0
O C
o
o• 3 Q
O
-1 O
-• (n n
O
n m
?
Ln a 3
A
N
0
O - (n
O
O\
•O 7 C 0 n
O
(D - m
O
7 0) -•
(n
(n m
N n <
v>
(n
n n 0) (D
N
O
O n
-
- n
W N
=3
x CD
CL
A
N
O 0) -F O
C
N
O D O -1
C)
d
-0 (D. {
T
-• N
S C
-I -•
3 £ N -1
=3 NI-
0).
0) 7
W_
-0 m
0 _
x
(D I
-' )n
cn O
(D
A
-{ (o
c 0) 7
O
O =7
0) - O (O
—
=3 -F
- -
(D u)
••G
A
c
-•
n
J
69
6q
64
N -I
(D
W
lIt
J
� 0
10
O
N
-I
J
J
10
O -
W
W
N
co O
W
Vf
O
n d
A
N
0
O
O\
O
O
O
O
m z
(n
(n m
z
x-
0
0) x
m
n
-
- n
=3
— •
(D
m —
0)
C
N
N C
CL N
d
T
-• N
-i
-I -•
N
=3 NI-
0).
0) 7
(n
x
x (n
cn O
(D
d D
x
—
n
(D u)
-
(n s
c
-•
n
-F -0
(D
0) 3
n
X (D