HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/19/1976MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
MONDAY, JANUARY 19, 1976 - 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL
Roll Call
PRESENT: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, Petterson and
Mayor Schwartz.
ABSENT: None
City Staff
PRESENT: J.H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk; R.D. Miller, Administrative
Officer; A.J. Shaw, City Attorney; D.F. Romero, Director
of Public Services; Wm. Flory, Director of Parks and
Recreation; E.L. Rodgers, Chief of Police; L. Schlobohm,
Chief of Fire Department; Rob Strong, Director of Community
Development
1. 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING on the report of the Superintendent of
Streets to consider assessment of cost of work on following properties for
curb, gutter, sidewalk and driveway ramps.
A. Under provisions of Ordinance No. 257.
Owners Name
W. and H. Cool
O.R. and C.G. Davis
S.S. and F. Kinsey
K.E. and L. Little-
' Three Year Option
Address
Cost
483 Sandercock Street $ 507.63
480 Branch Street 1,795.34
2046 King Street 539.19
2119 Hutton Street 539.19
C.C.
and H. Allen
2076
King Street
R.H.
& B.D. Collins
443
High Street
J.S.
Estrada etal
2135
Hutton Street
D.D.
& E.M. Law
446
Sandercock Street
E. McDaniels
464
Sandercock Street
H.E.
& E.V. Wright.
474
Branch Street.
G. Victorino
463
High Street
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open.
No one appeared before the Council for or against the matter.
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed.
$ 564.45
1,601.50
791.37
1,046.18
471.33
798.36
1,966.21
On motion of Councilman Graham,.seconded by Councilman Norris, the follow-
ing resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 2962 (1976 Series), a
resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo confirming cost
of sidewalks constructed under the provisions of the Municipal Code.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Graham, Norris, Gurnee, Petterson
and Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
B. Under the provisions of the 1911 Act.
Owners
Name
Address
Cost
W.O. &
W.L.
Lovelady
1551..Palm-Street:
$ •473.00
H.S. &
J.E.
Zelazny
1521 Palm Street
-515.00
I
City Council Minutes
January 19, 1976
Page 2
Three Year Option
D.V. Holmes
A.F. & R.E. Jensen
Mayor Schwartz declared
No one appeared before
Mayor Schwartz declared
370 Kentucky Street $1,015.00
1358 Peach Street 524.00
the public hearing open.-
the Council for or against the matter.
the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Norris, the
following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 2963 (1977 Series),
a resolution of the Council of the City.of San Luis Obispo confirming
costs of sidewalks constructed under the 1911 Act. .
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Graham, Norris, Gurnee, Petterson
and Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
C. Under the provisions of 1911 Act (Repairs)
Owners Name Address Cost
J. Adams 1350 Mill Street $ 106.25
E.L. & E.M. O'Reilly 1625 Monterey Street. 261.17
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open. '
J. Adams opposed being required to pay for cost of dedicated curb at 1350
Mill Street.
Mayor Schwartz declared.the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Councilman Petterson,.the follow-
ing resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 2964 (1976 Series),•a resolution
of the.Council of the City.of_.San.Luis Obispo confirming costs of sidewalks
constructed (repaired) under the 1911 Act.
Passed and adopted on the following.roll call vote:.
AYES: Councilmen Norris, Petterson, Graham, Gurnee
and Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
2. The City Council considered the final passage of Ordinance No. 656
(1975 Series).
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open.
No one appeared before the Council for or against the ordinance.
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed.
Councilman Gurnee stated he was opposed to the annexation due to lack of
water supply to supply the potential population in the area.
On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Mayor Schwartz, Ordinance
No. 656 was introduced for final passage; an ordinance approving proposed
South Street Annexation.
City Council.Minutes
January 19, 1976. .
Page 3
Finally passed on the following roll call voter
AYES: Councilmen Petterson, Graham, Norris and Mayor Schwartz
NOES: Councilman Gurnee
ABSENT: None
3. The City Council considered the final passage of Ordinance No. 657
(1975 Series).
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open.
Andrew Merriam, designer of the Specific.Plan, spoke in support of its
adoption by the Council.
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed.
On motion of Mayor Schwartz, seconded by Councilman Petterson, Ordinance
No. 657 was introduced for final passage, aa'ordinance approving the South
Street Specific Plan.
Finally passed on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Petterson, Gurnee, Norris
and Mayor Schwartz.
NOES: Councilman Graham
ABSENT: None
4. The City Council considered the final passage of Ordinance No. 658
' (1976 Series).
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open.
No one appeared before the Council for or against the ordinance.
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Petterson; Ordinance
No. 658 was introduced for final..passage, an ordinance amending the official
zone map of•the'City of San-I:uis Obispo (to rezone '601 Grove Street,
California Medical Center)..
Finally passed on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Gurnee, Petterson, Graham, Norris and
Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
5. The City Council considered the final passage of- Ordinance No. 659
(1976 Series).
Mayor Schwartz declared the public-hearing open._
No one appeared before the Council for or against the ordinance:
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Petterson,
Ordinance No. 659 was introduced for final passage, an ordinance amend-
ing the official zone map of the City to rezone property at 1330
Southwood Drive.
City Council Minutes
January 19, 1976
Page 4
Finally passed on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Gurnee, Petterson, Graham, Norris and
Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
6. The City Council considered the final passage of Ordinance No.
660 (1976 Series).
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing.open.
No one appeared before the Council for or against the ordinance.
Mayor Schwartz-declared the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by.COuncilman Petterson, Ordinance
No. 660 was introduced for final passage, an ordinance amending the-official
zone map of the City of San Luis Obispo (to rezone property at 1196, 1198
and 1200 Oceanaire Drive).
Finally passed on the.following roll _call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Norris, Petterson, Graham, Gurnee and
-Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
7. The City Council considered the final passage of Ordinance No. 661
(1976 Series).
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open.
No one appeared before the Council for or against the ordinance.
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Petterson, that
Ordinance No. 661, an ordinance amending the official ,zone map of the
City of San Luis Obispo (to rezone property at 1130 Orcutt Road) be
passed.
Finally passed on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Gurnee, Petterson, Graham, Norris and
Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
8.- Port-San Luis Harbor District Development
A. Reconsideration by the City'Council of the request of the=
ValleyVAd.vlsory Council, that the City Council support.their
request that future development at Port San Luis be put to vote
of district voters (cont'd from 1/5/76 and 1/7/76).
B. Memorandum from the Commissioners of Port San Luis Harbor
District on plans for Harbor development.
City Council Minutes
January 19, 1976
Page 5
C. Council consideration of.a resolution from Councilman Gurnee
regarding vote of future development at Port San Luis.
D. Communication from Elizabeth L. Collins, Atascadero, urging
the.City Council to-demand a vote on the future development
at Port San Luis.
Councilman Gurnee spoke in support of his proposed resolution to require
a vote by the people of the district for any proposal for.major development
at Port San Luis.
Walter Schwetz, Secretary-of the Avila - Valley Advisory Council spoke in
support of the Council's . request for ,a vote on any improvements.or develop-
ment at.Port`San Luis:
Ken Jones, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of full development of Port
San Luis as devised by the.Army.Corps of Engineers. He stated that these
were the basic plans supported by the Harbor District for over twenty
years. He was opposed calling for a popular vote.to.ratify previous
action.
Don Smith, San Luis Obispo, was opposed to the Harbor District Development
Plan and urged that the City Council demand a vote by the residents of the
district. He stated that it was his understanding that -the voters of-the
district had turned down this proposal once before but that the Harbor
Commissioners had found other sources -of financing from the Federal Govern-
ment and were moving ahead even though the plan had been rejected by the
voters.
James Lowe supported.the proposal-of allowing the voters of the district
to decide the extent of the proposed harbor development and also wanted
to know the ,effect this development would have on the environment at the
' port and on Avila Beach itself..
Councilman Gurnee again urged the Council to adopt his recommended reso-
lution so that the district- Voters could decide on the extent of the
proposed development.
Councilman Norris was in favor.of..the. improvements being planned .at Port
San Luis for the growing use of the harbor and he felt that the at
Harbor Commissioners should be.allowed to.run. their own district without
help.from: the City..of..San'Luis.Obispo..,
Councilman.Petterson agreed.that the Harbor.Commissioners who wereaalso .
elected officers should make the - necessary decisions on the,level of
improvements at Port San Luis.. He stated that they had held public
hearings and had concluded that these plans were.the best and.that he
would support their decision.
Councilman Graham stated that he would support an .election for phases
of development for Port San Luis but he would want a breakdown of the
construction costs first.
Mayor Schwartz stated he.would- support election for harbor.development
as requested by the Avila Valley Advisory Council as he felt: 1) the
items had changed and people.concerns had changed as.far.as the harbor
was concerned such as environmental concerns, growth limitations, etc.;
and 2) the impact on increased taxes to operate and maintain the facilities
and other cost factors facing-the-citizens-of the dist_rict.such as.flood .
control, schools, general county government,.etc.
On motion of Mayor.Schwartz,.seconded by Councilman. Gurnee, to request the
San Luis Harbor District -to permit.citizens to vote upon...any major develop-
ment at Port San Luis.
City Council Minutes
January 19, 1976
Page 6
Motion lost ori';the following vote:.
AYES: Councilman Gurnee and Mayor Schwartz
NOES: Councilmen Petterson, Norris and Graham
.ABSENT: None_
9. Further Council consideration of the Tentative M� of Tract No.
575 - Tres Hermanos Park, 28 lot industrial subdivision, Richard Burke,
developer.
On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Councilman Petter son, that
the City Council approve the Tentative Map of Tract No. 575, subject to
the following conditions recommended by the Planning Commission:
1. Fire hydrants shall be indicated on the tentative tract map.
2. The grading plan shall be in conformance with the City grading ordinance.
3. All drainage slopes shall be as per City ordinance.
4. The applicant shall provide full one -Half street improvements plus a
12 -foot travel lane along Sacramento Drive.
5. The applicant shall provide public utility easements and improvements
in cooperation with all public utilities.
6.-'A 10-'foot easement for street trees shall be indicated on the tentative
map, such easement shall extend from the back of the street right of way.'
7. The applicant shall pay all fees for municipal water,. sewer and street trees.
8. Water and sewer lines shall be separated by a minimum of 10 feet.
9. A blow -off shall be installed at the end of each water line, fire hydrant
type. .
10. Street lights shall be indicated on the tentative map.
11. Calculations of flow for the creek.shall be_provided and improvements__
f made to provide 100 -year storm capac�_ as. .required_by�the�City_Engineer.
12. City standard curb, gutter and.sidewalk shall be provided. Sidewalk
construction may be deferred, to be constructed at the time of develop-
ment of each lot provided that the final map and a covenant for each
lot is notated that sidewalks shall be required by the developer of
individual lots.
13. Lot 2 shall be modified to conform to. City standards..-.- - =
14. Lot 10 of Tract 442 shall be noted on the tentative map.
15. Sewer manholes shall be provided'instead of cleanouts at the following
locations:
A. On Sacramento Drive north of Via Estabaxi; and
B. At the bend in Roberto Court
The Council also recognizes in approving the tentative map the following
exceptions to minimum code requirements:
1. Average width of Lot 1 is• slightly less ,than 80 feet, a result of
tract boundary being at an acute angle to Sacramento Drive.
City'Council Minutes
January 19, 1976
Page 7
2. The frontage width of Lots 17 and 18 is less than 80 feet. The
s
average width is over-80 feet, but being on a street curve, the
narrower frontage appears to be a reasonable.request.
3. The center line radius of Roberto.Court -is 200 feet; 250 feet is
code minimum requirement. A shorter radius appears necessary to
accomplish..a desired lot arrangement. The street is a short cul-
de -sac with low vehicular speed, and a shorter radius would not
seem to create a,problem.
Motion carried on.the..following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Norris, Petterson, Graham and
—7 —ka or TSchwar'tz
NOES: Councilman Gurnee
ABSENT: None
On motion of:Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Graham, that staff
submit to Council alternate routes to extend Sacramento Way to Orcutt Road.
Motion carried.
The Attorney was asked to look into the practice of public utilities
sharing the cost with developers in installing services to new areas and
to recommend similar policy for Cable TV extensions.
10. Memorandum from Rob Strong, Community Development Director, regard-
ing a-referral from the County of San Luis Obispo, for an E.I.R. Determination
for Oxford Rezoning on Southwood Drive adjacent to the City of San.Luis Obispo.
The applicant was to request the County- to-:rezone"the subject property, con -
sisting of approximately 34.acres from A -3 -40 D 318 (agricultural,'40 acre
minimum lot size - clustered development) to A -1 -10 an agricultural zone
permitting one dwelling unit per 10 acres. The'applicant's apparent intent
was to subdivide the 34 acres into three individual lots comprising about 11.25
acres each. The lots would be used as building sites for single family
dwellings to be served by subsurface septic tank sewerage disposal systems
and on -site wells for domestic water supply.
The subject site was located near the end of Southwood Drive contiguous to
the City corporate boundary and immediately-north of.the Southwood Annex.,
Tract-485.'. The subject property had about 60 ft. of frontage on the stub
end of Southwood Drive.and also had frontage.on the full length of the.alley
serving Tract 485. Both streets were City right -of -ways.
The property in question was shown on the adopted and. recommended revision
of the City General Plan as open space. The City's Open Space Element
recommended that the general area.outside the City limits, in this location,
be treated as scenic sensitive and agricultural land. The area was definitely
not recommended for urbanization nor annexation into the City. Neither the
City's Land Use Element nor:.Open Space Element defined a permissible land use
for the open space land use category. It would appear that.the proposal to
subdivide and to construct dwellings at a density of one dwelling unit per
10 acres would be consistent with the General Plan intent of open space. The
City had never made that determination, however.
There appeared to be several concerns the City should address in responding to
the project and its potential for adverse environmental impact:
1. Land Use - the property should not be considered as having potential for
urbanization nor annexation. The applicant's proposal, if considered the
ultimate development potential for the property, appeared consistent with
this policy.
2. Access = the three individual parcels would have to achieve access onto
City streets and while the project proposal did not now contain the
City Council Minutes
January 19, 1976
Page 8
parcel configuration and individual access, the City should be consulted
prior to any subsequent subdivision.
3. Water and sewer - it was imperative that the on -site water and sewer systems
be adequate for the-long term usage by the homes which would be built.
Marginal acceptability might result in failure of the systems and
precipitate a request for.annexation and /or City. services. Sewering
to City lines would be expensive. Because the City was limited to 460
ft. elevation for water service, it would.be inappropriate for the '
City to serve the sites with City water. The County Health Dept.
should certify the long term capability of. the property.development,
to provide septic tank service systems and sufficient and uncontam-
inated water.
4. Overall potential for.environmental.imnact. -..tha n-o ect,..if certified
for on -site water and .sewer, would.not have significant adverse impact
on the environment. The land use potential for three houses instead
of one house would not add significantly to storm water..runoff. Three
houses on 34 acres, in a foothill location, would not have a significant
adverse esthetic effect assuming.location at the .foot of the hills. If
the project were approved, it would probably set a precedent for the remain-
ing undeveloped properties in the area to be rezoned to-.a . similar density. -
However, if the policy of non - urbanization was adhered to by the City and
County,.the project would not necessarily have.growth inducing impact.
Recommendation:
Staff recommended that the City Council forward a report recommending the
following to the County:
1. Project, if certified by County Health for on -site water and sewer
systems, would not have a significant adverse effect on the environment.
2. Project was consistent with the City open space and land use elements of
'
the adopted City General Plan.
3.. Subdivision map stiould.be.submitted to the City for review and recommend-
ation.
Councilman Gurnee stated he was opposed to the development due to the type
of land uses.allowed by the County.
On motion of.Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman.Norris, that the
City Council accept the recommendations of-the Planning.Commission.and staff
including the three conditions plus a fourth ._condition that no mobile..homes
be allowed in the development.
Motion carried on the following vote:
AYES:. Councilmen..Norris, Petterson, Graham aitd.Mayor Schwartz
NOES: Councilman Gurnee
ABSENT: None
11. On motion of Councilman Gurnee ,.seconded,.by.Cotincilman Petterson,
that the following be appointed to the Citizens Advisory Committee:
1. Elizabeth Zevely
,
2. Allan C. Johnson
3. Liz Fisher
4.. Kevin 0.'Connor
Motion carried. All ayes.
12. On motion.of Councilman Petterson,- seconded.by Councilman Gurnee,
that. the City.Council go on.record as opposing.SB 1294 - Compulsory and
City Council Minutes
January 19, 1976
Page 9
binding arbitration for Policemen and Firemen. Motion carried on the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Gurnee, Norris, Petterson, Graham and
Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
' ABSENT: None
111i1k69010 M -_00"*
C -1 On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Petterson,
that the claims against the City were approved and ordered paid subject to
the approval of the Administrative Officer.
C -2 On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Petterson,
the following contract payment and change order was approved and ordered
paid:
Wally LaFreniere Construction Est. No. 8 $17,962.00
CITY HALL REMODELLING C.C.O. No. 25 528.50
C -3 On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Petterson,
the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 2965, a resolution
of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving the Final Map of
Minor Subdivision No. 436, E1 Tigre Court and Madonna Road (Acme La Lande).
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Gurnee, Petterson, Graham, Norris and
Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
C -4 On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Petterson,
the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 2966, a resolution
of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo appointing Robert I. Corcoran
to administer the budget for the Downtown Parking and Business Improvement
Area.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Gurnee, Petterson, Graham, Norris and
Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
C -5 On motion of Mayor Schwartz, seconded by Councilman Petterson,
the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 2967, a resolution
of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving an agreement with
the State of California'Resources Agency, Department of Parks and Recreation,
for redevelopment of Mitchell Park facilities and authorizing the Mayor to
' execute said Agreement.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Gurnee, Norris, Petterson, Graham and
Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
City Council.Minutes
January 19, 1976
Page 10
William-Flory-,-'Director of -Parks and Recreation,-was appointed to be the
Project Director.
C -6 On motion-of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Mayor'Schwartz, that
the Council accept the recommendation of the Promotional Coordinating
Committee and grant $6,000.00 to the.Mozart Festival Association.. Motion
carried.
C -7. On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Petterson,
that the City Council concurred in the contract between the San Luis Obispo
County and Cities Area Planning Coordinating Council and John Nickelson
as Transit Manager. Motion carried.
C -8 On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Petterson,
the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 2959 (1976 Series),
a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo expressing the
City's gratitude and appreciation to Fire Marshal Don Sylvia for his long
and dedicated service to the City and its citizens.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Gurnee, Norris, Petterson, Graham and
Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
C =9`. On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Petterson,
the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 2970 (1976 Series),
a resolution increasing the 1975 -76 budget.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilman Gurnee, Petterson, Graham; Norris and
Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
C -10 On motion of Councilman.Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Petterson,
the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No.. 2969 (1976 Series),
a resolution of the Council of San Luis Obispo.approving an agreement pursuant
to the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 (CETA).
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Gurnee, Norris, Petterson, Graham and
Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
C -11 On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Petterson,
the City Engineer was authorized to order street light installation on
Upham Street between Chorro and Santa Barbara Avenue. Motion carried.
C -12 The City Council by common consent approved the request of the
Administrative Officer to set a public hearing to exempt the Fire Department
Training Officer (Captain) from overtime pay.
C -13 On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Petterson,
the claim against the City by Aracor, Inc., dba Pacific Motor Imports was
denied and referred to the City's insurance carrier. Motion carried.
1
1
1
1
1
City Council Minutes
January.19, 1976
Page 11
C -14 On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded-by-Councilman Petterson,
the claim against the City by Lester L. Barr was denied and referred to
the City's insurance carrier. Motion carried.
C -15 On motion of.Councilman Gurnee,. seconded by Councilman Petterson,
that the claim against the City by Laura L. O'Reilly be denied and referred
to the City's insurance carrier. Motion carried.
C -16 On motion of Councilman Gurnee; seconded by Councilman Petterson,
extended sick leave of one month was granted to Police Officer H. McChesney.
Motion carried.
C -17 On motion of Councilman-Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Petterson,
the following salary step-increases-were approved, effective February 1,
1976. Motion carried.
Neal Alston - Maintenance Man II
From Step 3 or $842 to .Step 4-or $888
Janice E. Balfour - Secretary
From Step 2 or $706'to Step 3 or $750
Sidney D. Bartholow. - Police Officer
From Step 3 -or $1072..to.Step 4 or $1130
Jon 0. Ecklund - Planning Assistant
From Step 3 or $1136 to Step 4 or $1198
Janet Grimm - Typist Clerk II'•
From Step 2 or $650 to Step 3 or $684
Arthur Hird - Administrative Assistant
From Step 4 or $1198 to Step 5 or $1266
John A. Huelsman - Police Officer
From Step..3 or $1130 to Step 4 or $1192
Alan D. Matthews - Police Officer
From Step 4 or $1130 to Step 5 or $1192
Walter Sanville.- Planning Associate
From Step 2 or $1198 to Step 3 or..$1266.
Malcolm Stone - Detective
From Step 4 or $1162 to Step 5 or $1226
Rene D. Stout - Account Clerk I
From Step 1 or $618 to Step 2 or $654
Ervin.C. Tomlinson - Maintenance Man II
From Step 1 or $752 to Step 2 or $794
C -18 On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Norris,
the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No: 2961, a resolution
honoring Leland A. Balatti for his many contributions to the San Luis Obispo
area. -.- _....
Passed and adopted on the following roll.call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Graham, Norris, Gurnee,.Petterson and
Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
City Council- Minutes
January 19; 1976•
Page 12
B -1 The City Clerk reported.that the following bids-were received for
Aerial Platform Truck.- bids received January 14, 1976.at 10:00 a.m.
1. Asplunph Equipment Sales & Service $279000.00
2501 Tyler
E1 Monte, California
2. California Truck Equipment Co. 29,992.76
3651 Sausalito Street
Los Alamitos, California
3. Hysen- Johnson Ford, Inc. 30,972.17
San Luis.Obispo, Calif. 93401
Administrative Officer, R.D. Miller, recommended that the low bid of
Asplundh be accepted.
On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Petterson, that the
City Council accept the low bid of Asplundh Equipment Sales and Service of
$27,000.00 to furnish the City with one aerial platform truck per City
specifications. Motion carried.
On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded.by Councilman Petterson, the
following resolution was introduced:- Resolution No.- 2968 (1976 Series),
a resolution increasing the 1975 -76 budget.
Passed and adopted on the following roll.call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Graham, Petterson, Gurnee; Norris and
Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
X. On motion of Councilman.Gurnee, seconded by Mayor Schwartz, that
the City communicate to the Promotional Coordinating Committee that the
City Council requeste&.that no further allocation of repetitive grants be
made without an approved five (5) year program and further ask the P.C.C.
to alter their fund application form to include:
1) Did organization receive prior funds from the City and explain differ-
ence in request, if any; and
2) Is request for funds in line with P.C.C.-long-range plan, if not, why
not?
Motion carried.
Y. On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Mayor Schwartz, the
meeting adjourned to 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, January 21,•1976 to continue
consideration of the Johnson Avenue Project. Motion carried.
APPROVED: October 5, 1976
. atrick, City Clerk
1
1
1