HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/05/1973MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA
Monday, November 5, 1973 - 7:00 P.M.
City Hall
Pledge
Roll Call:
PRESENT
ABSENT
City Staff
Councilmen John Brown, Myron Graham, T. Keith
Gurnee and Jesse Norris, and Mayor Kenneth E.
Schwartz
None
PRESENT: J. H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk; R. D. Miller,
Administrative Officer; A. J. Shaw, Jr., City
Attorney; Dave Williamson, Assistant Administra-
tive Officer; Jim Stockton, Park 8 Recreation
Department; R. A. Paul, Water Department Director;
Captain Don Englert, Police Dept.; D. F. Romero,
City Engineer; R. D. Young, Planning Director.
C -1. The City Council approved the minutes of the Special Called
' Fleeting of October 19, 1973.
C -2. The memorandum from Lane Wilson, Tree Committee, requesting
response to recommendations regarding the Residential Tree Program was
approved. The recommendations were as follows:
1. Trees may be planted as follows: one tree for each 30
feet or portion thereof.
2. Specific trees may be required as per a Master Street
Tree Plan.
3. Where standard tree well installations are required in
in the sidewalks, the City would supply the tree well
cover. The property owner would be responsible for the
installation of the tree well 1n accordance with City
specifications.
C -3 Communication from Robert E. Williams, Civil Engineer, Central
Coast Laboratories, presented a proposal for an exploratory program and
related laboratory testing to establish the design criteria for the
swimming facility -at Sinshe-imer -Park. The proposal included the
following:
1. Provide six exploratory test borings.
' 2. Obtain disturbed samples at all exploratory borings.
3. Obtain approximately 6 - 8 undisturbed samples at various
locations to study physical properties of in -place mater-
ials.
4. Excavate 3 trench sections and take approximately 9
filed density tests.
City Council Minutes
November 5, 1973
Page 2
5. Provide the necessary laboratory work.
6. Review the area for localized faulting.
7. Prepare a written report predicated on the results
of the filed and laboratory work.
8. Total cost of the wort; not to exceed $2,261.50.
The City Council approved the recommendation and the contract was
awarded.
C -4. Communication from J. William Zweifel and Carol A. Zweifel
requesting City crews to clear the culvert behind Viewmont as they
felt this would prevent future flooding, was referred to the Public
Works Department.
C -5. The City Council considered the staff report on the Boriack
property. On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Councilman
Graham the following resolution was passed. RESOLUTION NO. 2524, a
resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo rescinding
RESOLUTION NO. 2519 which authorized condemnation proceedings upon the
real property generally described as the Boriack property at 172 Broad
Street.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee and Norris and
Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
C -6. Communication from George Clucas, Chairman, Obispo Beautiful
Association urging public funds to support the Environmental Center
of San Luis Obispo.
On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Brown that this
communication was received and filed. Motion carried.
C -7. Progress report by R. A. Paul, Water Department Director,
on Ordinance No. 568 ".....Prohibiting construction in the Los Osos
Valley and Lower Higuera...." was ordered received, approved and filed.
C -8. Memorandum from R. A. Paul, Water Department Director, recom-
mending that the City Council rescind its request for voluntary water
use limitation by the residents of the Los Osos Valley - Lower Higuera
Area for the present was approved.
C -9. Memorandum from the Water Department Director regarding a re-
view of City's water rights - Salinas River at Salinas Dam recommending
Council to meet with its staff, special counsel - Mr. Frederick Bold, Jr. -
and its consulting engineer - Mr. Robert Edmonston - was approved with
City staff to select a date for the meeting.
C -10. Memorandum from R. A. Paul, Water Department Director,
recommending that the City Council endorse the recommendation of
Mr. James Gates, County Director of Environmental Health and direct
the Water Department Director to communicate that endorsement to the
County for the Cross - Connection Control Program was approved, but
convey to the County the thought that the City was not trying to dic-
tate County personnel policy.
1
1
1
City Council Minutes
November 5, 1973
Page 3
C -11. Memorandum from R. A. Paul, Water Department Director,
requesting that Council authorize the advertisement for separate bids
for five pipelines scheduled to be included in City Plan No. W73 -6, sub=
ject to receipt of the necessary agreements and financial deposits was
approved subject to posting of funds by developers.
C -12. Memorandum from R. A. Paul, Water Department Director,
recommending that the Council oppose Assembly Bill No. 2483 by Assembly-
man Nimmo (Small Agricultural Dams).
On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Councilman Graham the follow-
ing resolution was introduced. RESOLUTION NO. 2525, a resolution of the
Council of the City of San Luis Obispo opposing the adoption of Assembly
Bill No. 2483 .(Small Agricultural Dams).
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee, Norris and
Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
C -13. Memorandum from R. A. Paul, Water Department Director, regard-
ing establishment of areas of benefit for sharing in the cost of fire
hvdrant and related water main construction was continued to November
19, 1973, regarding the following projects:
SUMMARY OF PROJECTS
Project
' Proiect Amount Project Financed By
Augusta St. near - Vic Mori
San Marcos Court -
water main $ 6,574
McMillan Street Pounder & Sager - Contractors
from Orcutt to $6,303
Morrison -water City - $15,097
main $21,400
Peach St. from Volny Const. Co.
Morro to Chorro- Charles Kamm,
water main $11,368 Stanley Nelson & Family
Church St. from Wheeler Const. Co.- $1,287
Garden to Broad- City - $9,649
water main $10,936
Broad St. at Caudill- Jost Flooring - $1,440
$ 1,640 City - $200
C -14. Memorandum from R. A. Paul, Water Department Director, including
reduced pl:ans for a portion of the City's Los Osos Valley - Lower Higuera
' Area Water Supply Improvements, City Plan No. W73 -7 and requesting the
Council's authorization to advertise the reservoir fabrication and erec-
tion in conformance with the stipulations outlined in the memo was
approved, and staff was authorized to advertise for bids.
C -15. The Promotional Coordinating Committee made the following
recommendation to the City Council for grant of promotional funds for
the fiscal year 1973 -74:
City Council Minutes
November 5, 1973
Page 4
SAN LUIS OBISPO ART ASSOCIATION
The Promotional Coordinating Committee recommended that the
City Council grant the San Luis Obispo Art Association
$1,615.00 for the purpose of keeping the Art Center open an
additional two hours a day, Monday thru Friday and 5z hours
a day on Saturdays and Sundays, for the period November 1,
1973 thru June 30, 1974. (19 additional hours per week for
34 weeks at $2.50 per hour = $1,615.00)
2. SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION
The Promotional Coordinating Committee again recommended to
the City Council that they, the City of San Luis Obispo,
continue their support to the Symphony Association in the
amount of $5,000.00 for the fiscal year 1973 -74. It was the
Committee's feeling that the San Luis Obispo Symphony Orchestra
enhances the artistic and cultural environment of the City
and County of San Luis Obispo.
3. ASSOCIATED STUDENTS INCORPORATED CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC
STATE UNIVERSITY
The Promotional Coordinating Committee recommended to the City
Council that a $2,000.00 grant be made to the ASI -Cal Poly,
for dissemination of information to the community at large of
the programs being offered by the Associated Students Incorp-
orated Program Board. Information to be published on a
quarterly basis (sample copy attached for Council information).
The City Council approved the recommendations of the Promotional
Coordinating Committee, subject to filing of agreement on use of funds.
C -16. The request from the Human Relations Commission for a joint
meeting on Wednesday, November 14, 1973 was approved by the City
Council.
C -17. On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Councilman Graham
the following resolution was introduced. RESOLUTION NO. 2523,
a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo authorizing
the renting of a safe deposit box and designating persons with access
to said deposit box.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee and Norris and
Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
C -18. The communication from David K. Watts regarding a towing
charge was referred to the Traffic Committee for study.
C -19. Communication frorn John D. Nettleship, Chairman, Advisory
Committee on Joint Recreational Use of School District Property
recommending construction of a concession stand, restrooms, and press
facilities at Sinsheimer Park and requesting that the architect be
authorized to prepare plans and specifications.
On motion of Mayor Schwartz, seconded by Councilman Brown the request
was accepted in principle, subject to clearance with advisory boards,
i,L
`1
I
City Council Minutes
November 5, 1973
Page 5
Park & Recreation Commission and Design Review Board with staff to
bring back proposal for Council approval.
Motion carried unanimously.
C -20. Communication from G. E. Van Scoy, Property Representative
for Standard Oil Company, appealing the notice to abate drainage
channel obstruction at 3250 South Higuera, was referred to a future pub-
lic hearing.
C -21. Quarterly Report on C.I.P. Progress was ordered received and
filed.
C -22. Communication from State Solid Waste Management Board regard-
ing the adoption of a solid waste management plan before January 1,
1976 was ordered received and filed.
C -23. Resignation of Alva Williamson as a member of the Planning
Commission was accepted and Council subcommittee to recommend replace-
ment was reactivated.
C =24. Administrative Officer made the following announcements re-
garding promotions and appointments:
Elton R. Hall from Fire Captain to Battalion Chief, effective
November 1, 1973, starting at the fourth step or $1,224 with
recommendation that he be considered for advancement on an
annual basis.
Promotion of Fireman Gary Alstot to Fire Captain, effective
November 1, 1973, starting at the third step or $1,042 with
consideration for advancement on an annual basis.
Appointment of Steve R. LaFond to the position of Fireman
beginning November 1, 1973 at Step 1 or $772 per month,
subject to a one -year probationary period.
Appointment of Dale E. Strobridge to the position of Police
Officer beginning November 1, 1973 at Step 1 or $816 per
month, subject to one year's probation.
C -25. The following contract pay estimates were approved by the
City Council:.
R. Baker Const. Co. Est. #1
TRANSMISSION MAIN RELOCATION @
BRIZZIOLAR -I CREEK CROSSING
City Plan No. W73 -1
R. Baker Const. Co.
WATER PROJECT - LAWTON ST.
BETWEEN MITCHELL & SOUTH
City Plan No. W73 -2
R. Burke Corporation
CREEK OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL
City Plan No. 6 -73
Chas. Pratt Const.
HIGUERA -LOS OSOS VALLEY RD.
SEWER, WATER.... TRACT 467
City Plan No. 27 -73
Diani Const. Co.
LOCAL STREET RESURFACING
City Plan No. 6 -74, SS -193
Est. #2
Est. #3
Est. #3
Est. #1
Walter Bros. Const. Est. #3
MADONNA ROAD CULVERT ENLARGEMENT
City Plan No. 23 -73
$20,141.82
3,160.65
23,958.09
48,469.25
19,961.96
6,307.20
City Council Minutes
November 5, 1973
Page 6
Conco
General Engineering
Est. #2
$ 5,749.65
MINOR
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Est. #3 FINAL
1,043.50
City
Plan No. 25 -73
C.C.O. #1
360.00
Bunnell
Const. Co.
Est. #5
388.28
PAINT
& SIGN SHOP FOR CITY YARD
Est. #6 FINAL
1,902.50
City Plan No. 26 -73,SS -188 & 189
C.C.O. #1
C.C.P. #1
51.97
Walter Bros. Const. Est. #1 20,250.00
PREFUMO CHANNEL MODIFICATION
City Plan No. 7 -74
Greenearth Landscaping Const. Est. #1 685.38
REVISION TO PLANTER, PARKING LOT 1
City Plan No. 8 -74
Fred Julien & ,Assoc.
Est.
#1
3,447.23
SOUTH BROAD ST. SEWER & WATER
Est.
#1 -A
5,447.02
City Plan No. 10 -74
9,500.00
San Luis Obispo
Harold D. Peterson
Est.
#1
44,361.87
STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
Est.
#2 FINAL
4,929.10
City Plan No. 26 -73,SS -188 & 189
C.C.O. #1
1,605.16
R. Burke Corp.
Est.
#1
6,814.80
TASSAJARA ST. CULVERT RECONST.
City Plan No. 1 -74
Lee Wilson Electric Co.
Est.
#4
2,164.16
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION
City Plan No. 5 -73, SS -179
C -26. Request from the Mayor of Petaluma for $250 grant (continued
from October 1, 1973) was ordered received and filed; court decision
expected in early November.
On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Graham items C -1
through C -26 (less C -5, C -6, C -12, C -17 and C -19) were approved. Motion
carried.
B -1. The City Clerk reported on the following bids received for
PREFUMO CHANNEL VEGETATION REMOVAL, City Plan No. 9 -74. Bids opened
October 31,1973 at 2:00 P.M.
ALAN MC VAY
$5,400.00*
San Luis Obispo
WALTER BROS., CONST. CO.
6,443.00
San Luis Obispo
CONCO GEN. ENG. CONTP.S.
9,500.00
San Luis Obispo
MADONNA CONST. CO.
9,700.00
San Luis Obispo
* The City of San Luis Obispo specifications provide that "No bid
shall be accepted from a contractor who has not been licensed in
accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9, Division III of Business
& Professions Code." The apparent low bidder claims to have taken
and passed the examination for a Class A Contracting License. The
California State Licensing Board in Sacramento claims to have no
record of a license for this bidder on file as of this date. 10/31/73.
On: %motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Graham the low
responsible bid of Walter Bros. Const. Co. was accepted. ($6,443.00)
Motion carried.
C
1
1
1
1
City Council Minutes
November 5, 1973
Page 7
B -2. The City Clerk reported on the following bids received for
motor vehicles. (See Exhibit "A "). R. D. Miller, Administrative
Officer, recommended low bids be accepted, except that award of item
no. 4 be held up until receipt of assurance of Federal Criminal Justice
Grant was received, as follows:
1. Stanley Motors
2. Stanley Motors
3. Stanley Motors
4. Stanley Motors
5. Stanley Motors
6. Callahan 8 Sons
7. Kimball Motors
8. Kimball Motors
9. Kimball Motors
TOTAL
$3,200 Police 4 dr. sedan.
$3,210 Police station wagon.
$2,880 Police 4 dr. sedan, plus $15.90
for heavy duty vinyl -trim.
$3,294.86 2 dr. hardtop for police
dept., subject to approval of
criminal justice grant.
$3,030.91 4 dr. sedan for City
Clerk's office.
$2,929 Water Dept. pickup
$3,194.22 Rec. Dept. pickup
$3,121.29 Park Dept. pickup
$3,121.29 Park Dept. pickup
$27,981.57 plus sales tax
On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Brown the low
bids were accepted as recommended, except item no. 4, until Federal
grant was received. Motion carried.
B-3. The City Clerk reported on the following bids received from
NORTH BROAD STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, City Plan No. 11 -74. Bids
opened November 5, 1973 at 2:00 P.M. (See Exhibit "B ")
D. F. Romero, City Engineer, recommended that the low bid of Conco
for Project No. 1 be accepted and that Project No. 2 be dropped.
PROJECT NO. 1
CONCO $ 8,550.40
San Luis Obispo
WALTER BROS. CONST. CO. 10,380.24
San Luis Obispo
MADONNA CONST. CO. 14,390.00
San Luis Obispo
BURKE CORP. 15,394.00
San Luis Obispo
LOPEZ SEWER CONTR. 17,340.00
Santa Maria
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 11,989.60
On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Graham that
the contract be awarded to Conco for Project No. 1, $8,550.40.
' TC -1. At this time the City Council considered the Traffic Committee
Report of October 30, 1973.
73 -10 -5T
We have received further requests from residents requesting
further traffic controls at Laurel and Johnson. We recogni-7e there are
several contributing factors to an unsafe condition at this location,
although the area has been relatively free of accidents. Perhaps the
combination of high speeds, difficult terrain and other obstructions
to visability would warrant traffic signals earlier than would otherwise
be the case. We therefore suggest that the Council consider raising
City Council Minutes
November 5, -1973
Page 3
this item in priority during next spring's consideration of the up-
dated capital improvement program. It is not on the list at present.
Approved by the City Council.
73 -10 -6T (a)
On the request of Mrs. Langdale and others for corrective
measures at Carmel and Higuera, we have heard from the State DOT
District Traffic Engineer stating that the matter of providing one -
way tr�a#:fic on Carmel is of no interest to the State since it is a
City street. He goes on to say that he could not accede to the request
for a stop sign on Higuera because of the extreme hazard which would
be created and a resultant large number of rear -end accidents. He
also points to the extremely low number of accidents at this inter-
section in the past.
The Traffic Committee has heard reports from the Citv Engineer and
has carefully considered the suggestion that Carmel be made a one -way
street. We also have verbal reports from some property owners and /or
tenants on that street indicating opposition to such a plan. The
impression of line departmental staff is that the majority of accidents
in this area are caused by excessive speed and are not the type which
would be eliminated by installation of a one -way street. In fact,
they feel and we concur that this would create more problems than it
would solve.
As an alternate, we suggest that the red zone alongside 6rittain's
Stationery at the corner be extended for one car space by painting
out the one green space. We also recommend that one car space be
painted red on the east side of Carmel between the two service station
ramps. Finally, we recommend that the center stripe on Carmel be '
off -set to the northeast as it approaches Higuera. We feel that these
measures will help to define the entrance to Carmel for motorists
travelling south on Higuera and turning left on to Carmel.
On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Gurnee that
the recommendation be redirected to the Traffic Committee for consider-
ation of installation of one -way street on Carmel westbound. Motion
carried.
73 -10 -6T (b)
On the request of Fran Pubins, manager of the Olive Tree Inn,
for restoration of some curb parking in front of the restaurant and
motel, we referred this to the State DOT since they now have jurisdic-
tion. They have no objection to the removal of these restrictions. We
have looked at Mrs. Pubins' request and see no objection to removing
present red zoning for two car spaces in front of the restaurant
midway between the two driveway ramps, leaving open red space at either
end. We also feel that two spaces could be recovered in front of the
motel running easterly from the driveway ramp into the motel but leav-
ing approximately twenty feet of red zone immediately to the east of
the ramp.
In connection with the above, the DOT Traffic Engineer suggests that
we paint the curbing red in front of the Kentucky Fried Chicken
establishment at the corner of Olive and Santa Rosa to facilitate.
right hand turning movements and improve operation of the recently
installed signals at that location. This would consist of two car
spaces. We so recommend.
City Council Minutes
November 5, 1973
Page 9
73 -11 -1T
Now that the Police Department is enforcing double parking
prohibitions, the County Purchasing Agent at 1034 Monterey has noted
a problem for larger trucks which cannot load or unload inside the
garage storage area. He requests that one parking meter space be
removed in front of his office and replaced with a loading zone. We
recommend approval.
On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Mayor Schwartz, the
following resolution was introduced. RESOLUTION NO. 2528, a resolution
rescinding red zones and establishing a new red zone on Olive Street
and establishing a loading zone on Monterey Street. Passed and
adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Brown, Gurnee, Graham and Norris and
Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
73 -10 -6T (c)
On the request of Mr. Robert Clark that red curbing be in-
stalled on the west side of Broad north of Lawrence Drive to improve
visibility at that location, we likewise referred this to the State
DOT since they have jurisdiction. They have stated that they have no
objection to this plan which would involve about sixty feet to the
driveway ramp in front of 2783 Braod. However, they also suggest
trimming of the hedge at that corner. We have no objection to
either of these suggestions and recommend that, if the Council concurs,
a public hearing be scheduled.
Approved by the City Council.
73- 11 -2T- Negative recommendations.
(a) Request for stop sign on Verde at Luneta although-there
seems to be an obstruction to visibility on the northwest
corner which Mr. Romero will take a look at.
(b) Request by Walt Lambert, Tropicana Village Manager, for
crosswalk across Ramona Drive to Jordano's parking lot.
We feel this would create more of a hazard than exists at
present, since it would tend to give the students a false
sense of security.
The negative recommendations were accepted and the applicants were to
be informed of the Council's decision.
1. At this time the City Council considered the final passage
of Ordinance No. 598, an ordinance of the City of San Luis Obispo
permitting pinball machines within the City.
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open.
No one appeared before. the City Council for or against the ordinance.
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed. The Mayor stated
he was in support of the proposed ordinance change, but was also
interested in up- dating the license fees as those presently in effect
were those in effect at the time the machines were outlawed.
On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Graham,
ORDINANCE NO. 598 was finally passed on the following roll call vote:
City Council Minutes
November 5, 1973
Page 10
AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee and Mayor Schwartz
NOES: Councilman Norris
ABSENT: None
Z. At this time the City Council held a public hearing on the
recommendation of the Traffic Committee to red zone and prohibit park-
ing on the easterly side of Santa Rosa Street from Mill Street to
Walnut Street.
G. F. Romero, City Engineer, presented a sketch showing what was in-
tended by the Traffic Committee in this recommendation.
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open.
Stan Nelson, 770 Santa Rosa Street, objected to the proposal of the
Traffic Committee as he did not feel there was any need for additional
red zoning on Santa Rosa Street. He felt that all the proposal would
do was take away parking from the front of residences along Santa
Rosa Street and that the people living in these homes would not be able
to use the front of their homes for guest parking.
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed.
The City Council discussed with the staff the proposed elimination of
parking on the easterly side of Santa Rosa Street from Mill to Walnut
Street.
On motion of Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Gurnee, the
following resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 2554, a resolution prohibiting '
parking on Santa Rosa Street (between Mill and Walnut - Streets).
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Brown, Gurnee, Norris and Schwartz
NOES: Councilman Graham
ABSENT: None
The City Clerk was requested to advertise a further public hearing to
prohibit parking on Santa Rosa Street on the easterly side from Palm
to Mill Street which was inadvertently left out of this hearing.
3. At this time, the City Council held a public hearing on the
appeal from Chumash Village Mobilehome Park, 3057 South' Higuera Street,
and Creekside Mobilehome Park, 3960 South Higuera Street, to the
Planning Commission action amending their use permits to temporarily
limit occupancy in accordance with Ordinance No. 563 and No. 586, estab-
lishing a building moratorium within the Los Osos,Valley and Lower
Higuera Areas.
A. J. Shaw, Jr., City Attorney, reported that he had been in
with the Attorney representing Creekside Mobilehome Park and
requested that this matter be continued until they had their
prepared for presentation to the City Council.
The City Clerk reported that he did not send written notice
Attorney representing Chumash Village but they were notified
time of filing that the public hearing would be held on Nove
1973.
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open.
contact
they
case
to the
at the
nber 5,
No one appeared on behalf of the Creekside appeal and no one appeared
on behalf of the Chumas Village appeal.
1
I
City Council Minutes
November 5, 1973
Page 11
R. Young, Planning Director, reviewed for the City Council the
Planning Commission's action. The reason for amending the use permit
was that the State Division of Housing representative who was
responsible for controlling occupancy within mobilehome parks in re-
gard to the enforcement of the emergency ordinances, had asked the
Planning Commission to amend the use permits for the parks as this
would be the only way it could be controlled by the State Department
of Housing.
Mavor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Graham, that
the public hearings on the two mobilehome parks' appeals be continued
to the next Council meeting of .November 19, 1973, with the City Clerk
to notify the proponents of the time and place of the hearing.
Motion carried.
4. At this time, the City Council held a public hearing on the
recommendation of the Planning Commission and the Design Review Board
that the Council adopt an ordinance establishing an Architectural
Review Commission within the City of San Luis Obispo.
R. Young, Planning Director, presented for the Council's information,
the recommendation of the City Planning Commission and the Design
Review Board forwarding the suggested Architectural Review Ordinance
for the Council's consideration. He reviewed the number of meetings
held by both bodies, public hearings held, and the input from the
local Contractors' Association and the local chapter of the American
Institute of Planners in developing the final draft. He stated the
ordinance was intentionally brief and simple and was designed to set
forth the intent and authority for architectural review. The purpose
was to provide a foundation by which newly selected members of the
Architectural Review Commission could establish procedures and criteria
for architectural review. He concluded that many of the provisions
were compromises from the feelings of the Planning Commission, Design
Review Board, Contractors' Association and the Institute of Planners
and Architects.
A. J.. Shaw, Jr., City Attorney, then reviewed the proposed ordinance
section by section for the Council's consideration.
Peter Phillips, Chairman of the Design Review Board, reviewed the.studies-
that preceded the development of the draft ordinance being presented
this evening for the Council's consideration. He reviewed the joint
meetings with staff and the Planning Commission in arriving at what was
unquestionably a compromise from the original document. He recommended
that the City Council move ahead and enact the ordinance for the City.
Steve Petterson, Planning Commissioner, reviewed some of the areas
of interest to the Planning Commission in their recommendation that
the City Council adopt the Architectural Review Commission ordinance
as presented.
Councilman Norris asked what cost the City would incur for the additional
staff member to work with the Architectural Review Board. He felt this
information should be provided the Council and the public prior to
adoption of the ordinance.
R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer, stated he had not had an
opportunity to project the staff requirements but that Dave Williamson,
Assistant Administrative Officer, was looking into this matter and
would have a recommendation to the City Council within four weeks.
The City Council then discussed some of the provisions of the recommended
ordinance to establish an Architectural Review Commission within the City
of San Luis Obispo.
City Council Minutes
November 5, 1973
Page 12
Mavor Schwartz declared the public hearing open.
Art Wilson, Secretary - Manager of the San Luis Obispo County
Building Contractors' Association, stated that his association
strongly supported any efficient program that would insure high
standards of architecture for the City of San Luis Obispo, but his
association felt equally strongly that the creation of another
layer of government, with the creation of a seven - member commission,
might hinder rather:,than help to achieve the desired goals. They
felt the simple addition of a part -time consultitng architect to
the City Planning & Building Department could provide sufficient
expertise to protect the visual standards of all construction
within the City, but they felt that if the City Council was deter-
mined to go ahead with the adoption of an Architectural Commission,
the Building Contractors' Association respectfully requested that the
City Council consider presentation of the following disciplines on the
Commission:
Two members from architecture, preferrably state licensed
architects.
Two members from construction, preferrably state licensed
contractors.
One member from landscape architecture, preferrably state
licensed.
Two members from the community at large.
The Building Contractors' Association felt that their recommendation
was based upon a principle well established through all industry
that coordination of effort between the basic groups of people who
were going to be involved in the production, the design group and the
fabrication group. They felt these groups were of equal importance
and should be equally represented on this panel. He stated that a
seven member board was too large to operate efficiently. He felt
that what the Planning Commission and City Council really needed was
not another commission to check plans and specifications which just
added another layer of administration over building trades and others.
He felt this could be accomplished by adding a qualified architect
to the staff.
The City Clerk read a communication from Obispo Beautiful Association
supporting the concept of the creation of an architectural review
commission for the City of San Luis Obispo.
David Burke, 643 Felton Way, was opposed-to the creation of the
Architectural Review Commission as he was opposed to any one board
telling him how to build or develop his property.
Mr. Graves, 1654:Fairview, a student, felt the proposed Architectural
Review Commission would be good for the community.
James Fickes, architect, President of the Tolossa Chapter of the
American Institute of Architects, supported the proposed ordinance
and felt the plans could be checked by volunteers, not by a paid
staff, in order to help people develop their properties.
Dr. Larry Field, member of the Design Review Board, supported the
proposed Architectural Review Commission. He felt it was for the
good of the City. He also felt the extra cost of professional staff
was insignificant to the good which would be deri.ved by the public.
He felt the City needed this commission because all someone had to
do now was drive around San Luis Obispo and see what was in existence
at this time. He felt an Architectural Review Commission could make
some magnificent contributions to a more beautiful City compared to
what had been done in the past.
City Council Minutes
November 5, 1973
Page 13
Denny Wheeler, contractor, was opposed to the creation of the commission
primarily due to delays that would be faced by developers and contractors
in attempting to get plans and specifications approved. While this
might not affect the City operation, the delays in time meant loss of
money for not only the contractor but the purchaser of the property.
He felt that if the Council did proceed, then two contractors might
add to the consideration of the panel.
Warren Dolezal, developer, questioned the need for an Architectural
Review Commission in this City. He was worried primarily about the
additional time it would takb to get anything processed by the City
of San Luis Obispo with the additional panel reviewing plans. He then
listed for the Council's information the steps it now took to get a
project off the ground. He felt this commission would add approximately
one month if everything was ok. If not, he.could not estimate how
long it would take to please a seven member commission of various
disciplines. He hoped the Council would proceed slowly on the adoption
of this proposal.
Fred Strong, 1307 Morro Street, Morro Bay, representing the Citizens
for the Environment, questioned the need for this additional architect-
ural review commission checking plans for development within the City
of San Luis Obispo. He felt that possibly adding a qualified architect
to the staff could accomplish what the City wanted to do and through
this could possibly help the developer. He felt the architectural
review panel as envisioned would be used by the City to stop developers
with any large plans for the community. He felt the proposal would
ultimately cost the homeowner and citizens of San Luis Obispo addition-
al costs in home ownership if for no other reason than that of del.ay.
' Tim Beedle, Chairman of the Citizens Advisory Committee, spoke in
favor of the proposal but hoped that the procedures could be stream-
lined in order to minimize delays to developers and builders. He
felt contractors or construction managers should be included on the
board or commission to lend their expertise in development.
Donald Smith, 1750 Prefumo Canyon Road, felt the City needed some
high standards in development because just looking around town, he
felt some architectural input was needed.
Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed.
The City Council then discussed the proposal as recommended by the
Planning Commission and Design Review Board to initiate an Architectural
Review Commission within the City's governmental structure.
Councilman Gurnee was in.support of the proposal. He felt the ordinance
presented was fair and would do a good ,job for the community. He felt
that in time the permit system as envisioned could be streamlined and
would not cause additional delay in development. He too felt that a
contractor should be included in the make -up of the commission.
Councilman Norris was in general agreement with the goals of the
architectural review ordinance in enhancing the quality of life in the
City but he questioned the addition of another layer of government for
the citizens to go through in order to build a home or a commercial
establishment: It was his impression that what the citizens wanted was
less government and not more controls. He also was unclear as to where
the other boards and commission would relate to this new group. He
concluded that the City had too many commissions now for the citizens
to go through in order to develop their property. He continued that
if the Council insisted on this commission,then he urged that a con-
tractor or someone from the building industry be included on the member-
ship not as an advisor with no Dower, but as a full -board member voting
on final approval and review.
Councilman Brown was in accord with the concept of architectural
review as he felt it was needed in the City and would help further the
better development which was taking place at the present time. He
Citv Council Minutes
November 5, 1973
Page 14
also felt that a representative of the building industry should be
included in the membership. He felt the duties of the Design Review
Board could now be assumed by the Architectural Review Commission.
Councilman Graham was also in support of the concept of the
Architectural Review Commission but felt the ordinance could be
simplified in order to make it more workable and easier for persons
wishing to build within the City.
Mayor Schwartz was in support of the idea of an Architectural Review
Commission to advise other city boards and commissions and the City
Council in trying to improve the environment and make San Luis Obispo
a better place to live. He agreed that the proposal would cause
problems and possibly some delays but he felt that in the end every-
one must give a little in order to save the best of our community.
He felt the additional commission would put more citizens to work
for the City. He recommended to the City Council that they take
no action at this time but think about the comments made at the public
hearing and be prepared to complete the ordinance for publication at
the study session on November 12, 1973.
5. Memorandum from the City Planning Commission regarding an
amendment to the tentative tract map No. 471 on Flora Street, Roger
Brown, developer.
The Planning Commission recommended that the creation of six lots
along the south side of Flora Street as a minor amendment to the
tentative tract map of Tract 471 be approved as the six lots were in
conformance with the requirements of the zoning ordinance and they
recommended that the City Council so amend the map.
D. F. Romero, City Engineer, explained the Planning Commission action
showing the original development of five lots and the proposal with
the six lots.
On motion of Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Norris, that
the City Council accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission
and approve the amended tentative map of Tract No. 471. Motion carried
unanimously.
Item X: Mavor Schwartz reported to the City Council on the action
taken by the Board of Supervisors earlier this day in rejecting the
formation of a Flood Control gone with _joint powers control, and the
Board's decision to handle such matters through their own staff with
themselves as the final judges. He suggested that the Council con-
tinue this matter to the study session of November 12, 1973, for further
in -depth discussion.
Councilman Brown asked that the City staff look into alternatives for
Council consideration in the formation of a flood control .zone with
some control in management by the City of San Luis Obispo.
8:35 P.M. Mavor Schwartz called a recess.
9:00 P.M. The meeting reconvened with all Councilmen present.
6A. At this time the City Council considered the final draft of
the public transportation agreement as prepared by the Mass Transit
Committee.
A. J. Shaw. Jr. City Attorney, reviewed the basic provisions of the
amended transportation agreement and stated that the Mass Transit
Committee had recommended the changes and approved the amendments
and asked the City Council to concur and call for bids for a transit
system for San Luis Obispo.
City Council Minutes
November 5, 1973
Page 15
On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Graham, the
City Council approved the agreement and authorized the staff to
solicit bids for a transit system for the City of San Luis Obispo.
Motion carried unanimously.
6B. Communication from Andrew D. Jones, Chairman of the Mass
Transit Committee, recommending that the City Council continue the
Mass Transit Committee's operations for one more year in order to
monitor the recently adopted plan to implement a study of the bus
system in actual route and time schedules within the City.
He felt that the Committee should continue to study the proposal
they had made while the system is actually in operation within the
community. He also suggested, at the request of the Committee, that
Mr. John Holley, A.S.I. President at Cal Poly, be appointed as a
member of the committee representing Cal Poly due to the resignation
of Ken Silva.
On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Graham, the
request of the Mass Transit Committee was approved and the Committee
was asked to continue iitsoperation with Mr. Holley as a member of the
Committee. Motion carried.
6C. Memorandum from Andrew D. Jones recommending that the City
Council appoint a review board consisting of two members of the
Mass Transit Committee, two members from the City Council and staff
to hear presentation of proposals for providing public transportation
service for San Luis Obispo when the bids come in.
The City Council accepted the request and recommendation of the
Mass Transit Committee and asked the Chairman to appoint two members.
The Mayor appointed Councilman Norris and Graham as members and
Administrative Officer Miller and City - Clerk - Fitzpatrick as staff=
members of this committee.
6D. Memorandum from the City Engineer regarding the minutes of
the Mass Transit Committee meeting of October 10, 1973, and asking
for Council action on several items was ordered received and filed.
7. At this time the City Council considered a resolution of the
San Luis Obispo County Community College District Board of Trustees
supporting in principle the preliminary investigation of a joint enter-
prise construction of a community campus center facility on Cuesta
College Campus. The resolution provided for a community center
development to be placed on the Cuesta College campus at Camp San
Luis Obispo, that the Board of Trustees of the Community College
District would cooperatein the development of such a facility,
would help in developing plans and procedures for pursuit of the pro-
posed joint enterprise, would encourage the County of San Luis Obispo
and other appropriate governmental agencies to participate, that it
would seek State, Federal and /or private foundation support for the
project and they would support the preliminary architectural renderings
needed for the promotion or application for government or foundation
financial support.
Councilmen Norris and Graham, representatives to the Civic & Fine
Arts Committee fordevelopment of a community center, spoke in behalf
of the proposal for City participation in the development of a commun-
ity center at Cuesta College. The Council committee recommended that
there was a pressing need for a community center facility in or near
the City of San Luis Obispo and due to the high cost of land, possibly
in excess of $1 million and construction -costs of $1 million to $2
million, that it would serve the best interests of the citizens of
the City of San Luis Obispo and its surrounding area to cooperate
with the college which was willing to contribute approximately 10 acres
of land for this development. The College would also contribute
certain cash facilities and funds would be made available for develop-
ment, grounds would be maintained and the building would be maintained
City Counci I ivlinutes
November 5, 1973
Page 15
by the college in exchange for use of the building. The Council
committee recommended that the City Council set aside a reserve
(starting in the 1974/75 fiscal year) from the Bed Tax Fund,
Federal Revenue or other funds an amount approximating $90,000
for the development of this project.
Jack Fabbri, financial advisor to the Civic & Fine Arts Association,
spoke in favor of the Cuesta College proposal as he felt it was the
only logical way that a civic and fine arts building could ever be
constructed in this community in the face of the problems of financing
and land acquisition. He spoke in favor of the great contribution
being made by the Community College to the project and urged that
the City Council very carefully review the entire proposal and pledge
to set aside funds in the next fiscal year so this could be accomplished
in a relatively short period of time.
George Magi:nnis, President of the County Symphony Association, spoke
in support of the proposal to build a civic building at Cuesta College
with funds and contributions by the City of San Luis Obispo.
Dr. Bryant, Paso Robles, President of the Cuesta College Board, spoke
in favor of the proposal to build the facility on the campus. He
hoped the plans could move ahead so the facility would be available
for use by the citizens and students.
,i
Councilman Graham spoke in support of the proposal and also felt that
$90,000 was little enough for the City to be putting aside each year
for the development of a theatre or a civic and fine arts for use
by both the citizens of San Luis Obispo and by the college.
Councilman Brown was opposed to including a stated figure of $90,000
in a tentative agreement for investigating the development of such
a facility.
R. 0. Miller, Administrative Officer, commented regarding the funding
needs of the City in relation to the Civic & Fine Arts Building.
Councilman Gurnee agreed with the need for a theatre complex for the
City of San Luis Obispo and its environs and agreed that the City
should help but he felt that on the City's Capital Improvement Program
the theatre was not high on the priority list. He also felt that
other agencies in the County, including other cities in the County,
should take part in this construction at Cuesta College. He, too,
felt the figure of $90,000 should be included in the agreement. He
continued that he felt the public should be involved through a bond
issue for the support of the proposal. In that way, a vote would be
held on the issue and if the people did not desire such a facility,
they could vote against it. He did not feel it was fair to expect the
entire development by the citizens of the City of San Luis Obispo.
Mayor Schwartz felt this was a good proposal in principle but that he
could not go along with the prom -ise of $90,000 each year for an
unspecified number of years due to other commitments and responsibil-
ities of the City Council and needs for City financing. He felt that
in view of the major flood and water projects facing the City now and
needing funds, that the City would be severely encumbered for a number
of years in the future. In view of these problems, he felt he could
not go along with the proposal as presented by the Civic & Fine Arts
Association and the Council subcommittee.
The City Council then discussed amendments to the proposed resolution
supporting the development of a civic center facility.!at Cuesta College.
After some discussion the paragraph regarding financial support was
amended to read as follows:
"Resolved, that the City of San Luis Obispo shall attempt
to find ways and means to set aside each fiscal year start-
ing 1974 -1975 a cash reserve fund for the building of the
community center."
City Council Minutes
November 5, 1973
Page 17
On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Mayor Schwartz, the
following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2526, a
resolution of support, in principle, for preliminary investigation
of joint - enterprise construction of a community center facility on
Cuesta College Campus.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Norris and Mayor
Schwartz
NOES: Councilman Gurnee
ABSENT: None
8. The Citv Council considered a memorandum from the Council
subcommittee consisting of Councilmen Brown and Graham on the
Bilodeau street widening on Johnson Avenue. The committee reported
they had met several times with Mrs. Bilodeau, had solicited advice
from the City's Tree Committee and from Winton Frey and Howard Brown
of Cal Poly regarding possible damage to trees and other vegetation
along the frontage of the property. It was the committee's conclusion
that the widening across this frontage was not needed for traffic
at this time nor in the foreseeable future. They felt the primary need
at this time was for sidewalks for pedestrian traffic to the high
school facilities. With this conclusion in mind the committee
recommended to the City Council as follows:
1. that the City not widen across the Bilodeau and Chase
frontages at this time; .
2. that the City force the installation of curb, gutter
and sidewalk across these frontages under the 1911
Act assessment proceedings within the present right -
of -way;
3. that the improvements proposed by the committee would
narrow the sidewalk at three locations near trees from
6 feet to 5 feet. This would be accomplished by a
gentle bend in the retaining wall to allow more clearance
and minimize damage to tree roots. With this approach,
the City would still have sufficient width for four travel
lanes, two bike lanes and a six foot sidewalk narrowing
to five feet over a short distance at each tree; and
4. since the City ,Attorney had rule
against the property could be no
special benefits accruing to the
recommended that an appraiser be
modified appraisal in accordance
mended.
J that the sum assessed
greater than the
property, the committee
hired to submit a
with the project recom-
The committee concluded that if traffic increased in the intermediate
or distant future, if the property was developed to some other use, the
City could require widening of the street at that time.
On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Brown, that the
City Council accept the recommendation of the Council subcommittee.
Motion carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Brown and Norris
NOES: mayor Schwartz
ABSENT: None
City Council Minutes
November 5, 1973
Page 18
There being no further business, the Mayor adjourned the meeting.
APPROVED: February 19, 1974
zpatrick, City Clerk
1
LJ
1
1
1
S
W
H
Lb
Lu
W
H
r
a
ui
W
F-
a
g
LL
Lo
C -
O
f-
r1
Lr
V
ll LL
o w
Ln I--
Ln
In
}
L
C
7j
0
w
L f
N ca-
Ln
M
a M
N
LU
O W
H
N -
J
C
M
co N
w
O
w
T F-
U
(U
L M
} r
rn
O
+ L
w
Ln M F
N -
L
U O
- _o
O
Q 4-
> U
O
L
O
4- T
O o
c �
�n
L �
O�
(ll
� r
>
N
U W
U
'- O
Ln
O
l L"
W
CU _
C N m
- a
3 O
O
- Ln
—
O --
Li m
Cl- W
M M
C
M
M
CL
M
M
J
O
CD -
Y Y
CV
I N
U L
Lo O LO
- (
N N
I -
L d
+
+
Q L
M
M
ror
Ef?
(N I Ci
N U
rvl
M
Q.
M
M
Ln
O O
IZ
Y Y
N 1
N
U L
LO O LO
- CC
r0r
I -
W n
+
+
S d
M
M
Cl- W
M M
C
�
(3)
d
Y Q)
ko
J
O
CD -
1' s
I�D
I JO
U L
V 0 �
N N
N
Cl- W
M M
C
�
(3)
G 0
Y Q)
u }-
O
CD -
O
W O
cc N Lo
Ln LL
N N
r r
Y
N
Q L
(V I N
o Lv
ror
W -
(N I Ci
N U
d' I--
M M
o
V9
Ln
O O
IZ
kD �D
0Q)
m -
U
Lrr, I n
C) •-
r0r
n —
Ln I Ln
G O
Ln co
S d
M M
I-
�A
>
r o r
Iv
oll C
_
U
S
Q -
C O O
0 -
Lo O Lo
LLJ
00 N to
(n WO
O W
O C z
M M
2
1114
J
to O Lo
Lli
C`J O N
U
J O
O -
M O M
CD -
Ln O n
G O
n
V M
O O
O O
' 1 Q
rnOrn
O I O
M M
b9
'T I 7
CE O CT
O 1 O
M M
b9
O 0
O O
;r I Q
al CD C�
M M
b9
O 0 0
O O O
rn0G�
rLnN
0 - 0S
M N
t�
O O
O O
lG I �O
ko O o
I
M M
b9
O O
O O
co O co
C 1 G
000
000
r o r
Cb Ln M
n 'C7
M rn
b9
O O O
O O O
G O D
Ln v
r- qzzr
Q M
kfl
Ooo
000
m Lfi d
vrr
r N �
rn M
U
W O
U co
- L
I +-
Ln
Ln
Ow
O O
0 0
Ln I Ln
r o r
M I M
M M
b9
MMEMM
l W
Ln I Ln
r O r
M I M
M M
O O
n I Ln
M O N-�
d I
M M
b9
LnMO
r r O
V d O
M O M
M M O
M h-)
b9
CT (T
O 1 O
M O M
O 1 O
M M
kfi
�cl kD
CO co
d I
G�om
N I N
M M
b9
Lb Lb O
Ls m 0
- o
M Ln cO
M •zj- CO
M N
kA
v v O
- O
CT m O
Ln T
rn r N
rn h�
b9
co coo
r r o
CV N O
r r O
•zr N N
M M
b9
N
W
U L.
- L
I 4-
Lr,
0 U
- O w
LT CT
N N
I
N O N
M M
b9
ON T
N C.I
N 1 N
M M
to
N CV
N N
Q I V
C� O CT
1
M Mi
b9
�o O Lo
N O N
CD v
'T O -z3-
O
M M
b9
d I ?
N O N
CV I N
M M
W
L I
O
O 1
b9
O O co
I�r O lzr
-- O
O Ln
V M O
M M
kfi
P
1
O
O 1
c
b4
•-T O a
Lo O o
G� O CS
000
Lo M M
M M
kfi
U
W _0
C_) LO
- L
CI-
4- Ln
U Ln
Ow
m - L
� I
O
O 1
C
kA
l�
I
O
O 1
C
kA
I
O
O 1
c
kH
� 1
O
O I
C
b9
O O
O O
d' I C
O O CC)
M I M
M M
b9
O O
O O
� I r
rnOGr\
� I C
M M
K
a I
O O
C
b9
1
0
O 1
c
by
� I
0
O I
c
b9
U
W C
U LD
- L
a 4-
m
0 to H
- o w
r O r-
(3)
G 0
z
C •-
O
CD -
O O �D
W O
cc N Lo
Ln LL
M to
b9
N
W
}
O
}
L.
- t
(n Ln
d' I--
CL
o
n
Ln
C) Ln F
— Lv w
°
m -
O O
O O
' 1 Q
rnOrn
O I O
M M
b9
'T I 7
CE O CT
O 1 O
M M
b9
O 0
O O
;r I Q
al CD C�
M M
b9
O 0 0
O O O
rn0G�
rLnN
0 - 0S
M N
t�
O O
O O
lG I �O
ko O o
I
M M
b9
O O
O O
co O co
C 1 G
000
000
r o r
Cb Ln M
n 'C7
M rn
b9
O O O
O O O
G O D
Ln v
r- qzzr
Q M
kfl
Ooo
000
m Lfi d
vrr
r N �
rn M
U
W O
U co
- L
I +-
Ln
Ln
Ow
O O
0 0
Ln I Ln
r o r
M I M
M M
b9
MMEMM
l W
Ln I Ln
r O r
M I M
M M
O O
n I Ln
M O N-�
d I
M M
b9
LnMO
r r O
V d O
M O M
M M O
M h-)
b9
CT (T
O 1 O
M O M
O 1 O
M M
kfi
�cl kD
CO co
d I
G�om
N I N
M M
b9
Lb Lb O
Ls m 0
- o
M Ln cO
M •zj- CO
M N
kA
v v O
- O
CT m O
Ln T
rn r N
rn h�
b9
co coo
r r o
CV N O
r r O
•zr N N
M M
b9
N
W
U L.
- L
I 4-
Lr,
0 U
- O w
LT CT
N N
I
N O N
M M
b9
ON T
N C.I
N 1 N
M M
to
N CV
N N
Q I V
C� O CT
1
M Mi
b9
�o O Lo
N O N
CD v
'T O -z3-
O
M M
b9
d I ?
N O N
CV I N
M M
W
L I
O
O 1
b9
O O co
I�r O lzr
-- O
O Ln
V M O
M M
kfi
P
1
O
O 1
c
b4
•-T O a
Lo O o
G� O CS
000
Lo M M
M M
kfi
U
W _0
C_) LO
- L
CI-
4- Ln
U Ln
Ow
m - L
� I
O
O 1
C
kA
l�
I
O
O 1
C
kA
I
O
O 1
c
kH
� 1
O
O I
C
b9
O O
O O
d' I C
O O CC)
M I M
M M
b9
O O
O O
� I r
rnOGr\
� I C
M M
K
a I
O O
C
b9
1
0
O 1
c
by
� I
0
O I
c
b9
U
W C
U LD
- L
a 4-
m
0 to H
- o w
O
0-
N
O
Ln
J
C
1D N
Ln -o
m Ln
O
w N
N
I L
>
N !y
CU L
X
m c
+ O
N N
Ly C
O
ro -
N }
- U
(p _
U v
O -
- V
(ll
CI-
C: Ln
LD
(U
} n
LO
} }
U1 L
Cll
N >
N
M
X OL
Q w
N C
U O
}
CL ro
- O
m t7
H
ED
2
X
W
(0
CU
tli
N
CU
U
Q)
}
}
}
T
(n Ln
Ln
Ln
o
Ln
n
_
°
`-
O-
a
o (1)
o
L,- i
Ln co
L
I- L
I-
(Z' L
>
S
}
}
LO F-
f- +-
O Ln
? C
C T
O W
O C z
O
2
T O
J
iE: OQ
I Ln
S
W
J O
U
O
Q
N 7
W O
CT CD
c. O s
m
> Ln Of
Ln Ln Of
-J -0
¢M}
5 -w
0 nw
0 0
G N O
H rr1 J
- (D S
of N 2E
S -I LL
C) - p
rn - a
Y O U
C) Q
O
0-
N
O
Ln
J
C
1D N
Ln -o
m Ln
O
w N
N
I L
>
N !y
CU L
X
m c
+ O
N N
Ly C
O
ro -
N }
- U
(p _
U v
O -
- V
(ll
CI-
C: Ln
LD
(U
} n
LO
} }
U1 L
Cll
N >
N
M
X OL
Q w
N C
U O
}
CL ro
- O
m t7
H
ED
2
X
W
DEVIATIONS FROM CITY SPECIFICATIONS
HYSEN - JOHNSON FORD. INC.
ITEMS 1 8 3 Wheel base 121 inches
460 - 4V - V8 ENG. - -- 70 AMP AIT. Motorcraft
80 AMP Battery
ITEM 2 460 - 4V - V8 ENG. - -- 70 AMP AIT. -- 68 AMP Battery
Tires - H78 x 14 =- Belted
ITEM 4 351 - 2V - V8 ENG. - -- Tires - G 78 x 14 - 4 P.R.
ITEM 5 351 - 2V - VS ENG. - -- Tires - G 78 v, 14 - 4 P.R.
Delivery -- 60 to 90 days
CALLAHAN u SONS, INC.
ITEMS 6, 7, All truck - G78 x 15 4 -ply rated tires only. 3 -Ply must have
3, & 9 Booster Brakes at an additional cost of $67.00
ITEM 6 Standard Ratio only 3.23. No Glove Box lock.
ITEM 2 14 inch Wheels only - 360 cu. in 4 barrel carb. only.
Standard Key Lock System
Delivery -- Minimum 120 days
STANLEY MOTORS INC.
ITEMS 1 - 5 Delivery approximately 90 days after receipt of order by factory.
ITEMS 1 - 3 Deactivate or removal of rear door handles not available from
factory.
ITEM 2 G 78 x 15 tires N /A, standard and largest tires available are
H 78 x 14 BB BSVI. Heavy duty trim N/A, bulletin vinyl trim only.
Maximum enaine available in California is E56 360 4BBL.
Standard key locking system only.
ITEM 3 Special solid paint if required $20.00. Special two -tone paint
if required $40.00. Heavy duty vinyl trim available only in
black or chestnut for $15.90.
ITEM 4 8 -ply tires N /A: tires will be G 78 x 14 WSI-J EB. Standard cool-
ing system only. Police pkg available for $75.00 if necessary
which includes; 65 amp alt, 70 amp battery, heavy duty brakes,
maximum cooling pkg., calibrated speedometer, heavy duty stop
light switch, police power steering.
ITEM 5 8 -Ply tires N /A, tires will be G 78 x 14 BSl•1 BB tubeless.
KIMBALL MOTOR CO.
ITEMS 1 3 3 #14 6.0" wheels instead of 6.5" wheels. #19 Ignition key
different from door -trunk key.
ITEM 6 #2 Cab - No glove compartment lock.
GROVE MOTORS
ITEM 4 Engine 360 V8. Wheel base 114 inches. Tire; White G 73 x 14.
ITEM 5 Tire G 78 x 14 Load range B. Shocks less than Monroe 500,
does include heavy duty springs and rear sway bar.
Delivery -- 60 days from order date.
1
owl
N
CO
O O
+ L L
c }
C U Ci U
L N
+ O O
- L L
G W CL
N
_m
O
Q) _ -
C: +
C U
L N
N •�
+ O
- t
G a-
0 O
G L
O +
Z fn RJ + }
c U U
C J L Q) N
C + O O
n — L L-
< d d
L c
U I-
H
Z O N
W Q
W O
> m N Z
O +
n c +
c U
� L Q)
•0
+ O
W - L-
CD Q d
Q•
O
H
W
W
H O
(n Z
s
p }
q W U
O CU
(r O
m O O
L
2 N W
H
0 }
O m
L
M
L r
O (7%
>
tU �
- L
O
O
N
O
O
0
D
[
O
O
O
p
O
M
0T 'O
O
M
O
c0
r
r
rn
O
O
N m
O
N
r
�o
^ O
rn
M
N
M
V' .-
W
N
N
N
N
O
O
00
O
O
O
O
[
O
O
O
O
^
�O
CT
ON
Ln
-o
c0
co
�O
C\l
d'
n
r
O
M
o
�
m
co
v
0
^-
M
O
N
N
N
N
N
Z
tH
n
n
0
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
^
O
O
O
C%
O
Ln
ON
Ln
-o
c0
Ln
�O
V
d'
n
N co
O
M
(T
t0
❑]
co
cc
r
^-
-
O
N
N
N
M
c
z
bq
n
n
0
O
O
OD
O
O
O
n
co
O
O
N
O
C%
O
Z'
ON
O
co
In
tf�
c
n
O
n
N co
0
M
O
c
O
•--
•--.
^-
N Z
bq
O
O
O
O
O
c
O
O
O
p
Q
N
O
O
O
C%
O
O
O
O
w
T�
rn
rn
c
m
Ln
M
M
M
M
O O v n r
I
2
w
U .O
}
t>
U
z
•E
O
O
O
O
p
w
n
n
0
-o
Ld
N
^ Nn
m (n
f- O
r�
0
0
W
•-..-
. O •-
U) ^ -
. n .-
c
.p _
Q
Un D
co CO -0
Z D\ -0
_. 0T -0
W' M m
N
-
O
O O
O O
cL O
w -
01
m
X
W' X
U X
2 x
X L
�
L
O �n
2
co O in
O )
O Ln
w m S
.- a
O
o]
Q �l .�
�O
3 0
N
7
of 7
Z 7
7
O
C
0 J
W J
Z J
W
• f0
- N
•-
UO
I-O
00
YO
W0+
— _0
Gl
Z C
J C
p C
O.' C
a-C
0 ._
c
0 ro
2 O
Q . ro
2 rJ
0 • (o
Li OJ
W
U d U)
:�: 2 co
= d U7
CCi CL cn
J al cn
I
2
w