Loading...
06/17/1974ri 1 1 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA .Monday, June 17., 1974 - 7:00 P.M. City Hall Pledge Roll Call PRESENT: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz . ABSENT : None City Staff PRESENT: J. H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk; R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer; A. J. Shaw, Jr., City Attorney; E. L. Rodgers, Police Chief; L. Schlobohm, Fire Chief; Robert Strong, Planning & Building Director; D. F. Romero, City Engineer. 1. At this time the City. Council had scheduled a public hearing on the adoption of the 1974/75 budget for the City of San Luis Obispo. Due to the incompleteness of the budget at this time the matter was continued to 7:30 P.M., June 24, 1974. Consent Items: C -1. Payment of claims against the City of San Luis Obispo for the month of June, 1974, was authorized subject to approval by the Administrative Officer. C -2. The City Council considered an agreement for the City to participate in the California Highway Patrol's Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program for the period July 1, 1974, through June 30, 1975. It was agreed that the Mayor be authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the City. On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Councilman Brown, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2623, A Resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo authorizing the City to participate in the 1974 -75 Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program of the State of California. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None C -3. On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Councilman Brown, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2617, A Resolution Adjusting the 1973 -74 Budget. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None City Council Minutes June 17, 1974 Page 2 C -4. On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Councilman Brown, the following Resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2624, A Resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo revising the City's 1973 -74 Annual Transportation Clraim against the Local Transportation Fund of the County of San Luis Obispo. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz , NOES: None ABSENT: None C -5. On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded.by Councilman Graham, that the City Council reappoint Andrew Jones -and Walter Rice as the City's representatives to the advisory group to the Regional Transportation Citizens' Advisory Committee. Motion carried, all ayes. On motion of Councilman Norri.s,seconded by Councilman Brown, the following consent items were approved as recommended. C -6. The request from Diane Daoust that the City Council enact an ordinance prohibiting the use of electric fences within the City limits was referred to staff for report. C -7. The communication from the Central Rehabilitation Clinic notifying the City Council of the need for a special van with a wheelchair lifts to serve handicapped children and adults was referred to the Human Relations Commission for comment. C -8. The memorandum requesting sick leave in excess of one week for ' Johnny Johns was approved. C -9. The memorandum from the .Water Director requesting six weeks of sick leave for Robert loppini was approved. C -10. R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer, announced the appointment'of Gene T. Johnson, Senior Engineering Aide at Step 1 or $670 per month, effective June 17, 1974, subject to one =year probationary period. TC -1. Recommendation from the Traffic Committee regarding public works and and Police Department on parking in the downtown central business district. (5) Require contractors working on construction jobs to pay parking meters. The Traffic Committee reviewed the recommendation which was continued from the meeting of June 3, 1974. Councilman Graham suggested that contractors and utility companies buy.a parking permit which would allow them to park in metered zones at the curb whil.e actually engaged in contract work. Councilman Norris felt the City Council should continue the existing policy of allowing contractors and utility companies to park in meter spaces if a work order was placed in the windshield of the service vehicle. Councilman Gurnee felt that everyone who parked in a metered space except grand jury and court jury members in the area surrounding the Courthouse should pay for parking privileges. R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer, suggested that the City either sell decals for parking or allow the contractors to pay the parking meters when they parked in the downtown area. City Council Minutes June 17, 1974 Page 3 A. J. Shaw, Jr., City Attorney, stated there were no exemptions from parking meter requirements in the Municipal Code. It was his opinion that the City Council should either see to it that the parking regulations were enforced or actually prepare an exemption for the Police Department to follow. On motion of \Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman.Brown, that the City Council accept the recommendation of the Traffic Committee and require that all persons using the downtown parking meter spaces pay for the privilege either by paying the meter or by applying for a parking permit from the City. Councilman Norris felt that the contractors should either pay the meter or buy an annual parking permit in the parking district. He felt that in justice this should be worked out before the new regulations went into effect. Motion carried, all ayes. 2. At this time the City Council held a public hearing on the planned use report for Revenue Sharing Funds received by the City from the Federal Government for the period July 1, 1974 through June 30, 1975. Planned use..: by the City would be for water system improvements, $408,847.00,plus accrued interest. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open. No one appeared before the City Council for or against the planned use of funds. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed. On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Graham, that the City Council approve: the planned use of Revenue Sharing Funds as proposed. Motion carried on the follow.i�ng roll call vote: AYES.: Councilmen Brown;-,,Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None 3. At this time the City Council held a public hearing on the request of the Police Officers' Association for Impasse Determination by the City Council on time and one -half for overtime. (See Transcript, Court Reporter, dated June 17, 1974 - Exhibit "A ") 4. At this time the City Council held a public hearing on the amended Open Space Plan for the City of San Luis Obispo. Robert Strong, Planning, D1 rector, submitted for the Council's consideration the amended Open Space Plan and Element of the City's General Plan as prepared by the City Planning Commission, reviewed by the City Council and referred back to the Planning Commission for further hearing and amendment. He stated the document before the City Council this evening was the amended copy following public hearings by the Planning Commission. Councilman Brown stated he had no comments at this time. Councilman Graham stated that he would go along with the Planning Commission recommendation on the amended Open Space Plan. He.felt that it now met the objections that he had to the original plan. Councilman Gurnee stated he reviewed with Mr. Strong the method used by the Planning Commission in arriving at the recommended amended Open Space Plan. He did not feel that this plan met the requirements brought before the Council at the Fast public hearing, and particularly did not feel that the Planning Commission established proper zones for the protection of agricultural land as he had proposed in the recommendations. City Council Minutes June 17, 1974 Page 4. Robert Strong, Planning Director, stated that the Planning Commission studied the amended plan on a page -by -page, paragraph -by- paragraph basis and that the amended plan before the City Council.was the consensus of the majority of the members on each item. Ms. Valerie Endres, Planning Commission Chairperson, stated that the Planning Commission by consensus decided that it did not wish to recommend such a strong statement as proposed in the prior plan by Councilman Gurnee, dealing with the protection of farm lands within the community. Councilman Norris stated that he was in support of the Planning Commission's revised Open Space Plan and would support the amended plan as submitted. Mayor Schwartz stated he was in support of the Planning Commission's amended Open Space Plan, and felt that the goals shown on Page 15 outlined his consideration on agricultural zones. Councilman Gurnee stated that he did not share the feAlings of his fellow councilmen or their confidence in the Planning Commission's Open Space Plan. He felt that the amended plan did not face the issues any better than the original plan had. He felt that it was just the original plan of the Planning Department, rewritten in better prose but was. stiII as ineffective. as far as agricultural land protection was concerned. He also felt that the plan lacked any imagination and did not protect the land goals within the community. He felt the proposals were timid, the input was weak, and the entire plan was stale and of no benefit to the City or to its citizens. Councilman Brown stated that he felt the Planning Commission plan was a reasonable approach to a City Open Space Plan. He felt that the implementing elements of the plan would come in the precise plans of the City, which would include future planning to protect agricultural land as annexed. Councilman Graham agreed with Robert Strong's statement that this was only an interim plan until the consultants, KDG, brought in a new open space plan with all the new considerations for protection of the open space. Mayor Schwartz.declared the public hearing open. R. Barrows, 770 Meinecke Street, stated he was in support of any open space plan which could meet the desires of the Planning Commission and the citizens of the City. Kathy Scala, Pismo Street, felt that in listening to the Council discussion, she felt the plan needed some more study by Councilmen and staff. Mayor.Schwartz declared the .public hearing closed. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Brown, the following Resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2618, A Resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo adopting an- pen Space Plan for the City's General Plan. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES:. Councilmen Brown:; Graham, Norrims and Mayor Schwartz NOES: Councilman Gurnee ABSENT: None 5. At this time the City Council considered the final passage of ORDINANCE NO. 616, An Ordinance amending the official zone map of the City--of San Luis Obispo (rezoning area bounded by High, South, and Higuera Streets from M to C -H). Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open. No.-one appeared before the City Council for or against the ordinance. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed. 1 1 1 City Council Minutes June 17, 1974 Page 5 On. motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Graham, the ordinance was introduced for final passage on.the following roll call vote AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None 6. At this time the City Council considered the final passage of ORDINANCE NO. 617, An Ordinance of the City of San Luis Obispo amending the Municipal Code and the City's or for the regulation of contributions and expenditures in Municipal Elections by deleting.the provisions concerning solicitation agents and changing the day for publication of campaign statements. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open. No one appeared before the City Council for or against amending the ordinance. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed. Councilman Brown stated he was still opposed to the adoption of this ordinance. He felt it was unnecessary and was an attempt to take many potent.ial candidates out of contention for City office. He was opposed as he felt this represented over - control. On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Council.man Graham, the ordinance was introduced for final passage on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ' ABSENT: .None 7. D. F. Romero, City Engineer, submitted a report on behalf of the staff dealing with the dumping of debris on the storage yard operated by the City adjacent to the Scala property on Pismo Street. The City Engineer reported that the Public Works Department had installed a "No.Dumping" sign on the property and had cleaned up the dump site. He continued that the City was now looking for a different location to deposit street sweepings. Meanwhile, they had relocated the dump site for the street sweeper to the property further to the south near the Water Department rear gate and beyond the Scala property. He concluded that the City staff would continue to exercise special care in seeing that all City operations were kept as neat as possible. The report was ordered received and filed. 8. Communication from thel"Fire'Chief recommending that Fire Zone II be extended.to inc6ude the block bounded by Monterey, California Blvd., Palm Street and the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way. The Fire Chief stated that in order for improvements to be made in this block by the property owners, Karleskint -Crum, that the Fire Zone change would have to be made in order to provide the proper material for construction.. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Brown, the following ordinance was introduced: ORDINANCE NO. 620, An Ordinance of the City of San Luis Obispo revising and amending the Fire Zone Map. Passed to print on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None City Council Minutes June 17, 1974 Page 6 9. The City Council again reviewed the staff report on the Edna Saddle Reservoir Site Preparation bids whFch had been received May 30, 1974. This consideration was continued from the Council meeting of June 10, 1974. See Exhibit "B ". R. A. Paul, Water Department Director, recommended that the City Council defer action on awarding the bids or rejecting the bids; and allow the staff to contact the low bidder, Madonna Construction Company to see if some adjustment in price could be made on the various items of the bid. R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer, reported to the City Council that he had heard of a number of complaints from contractors who had been prepared to bid on the project, but they said that due to poor preparation of the specifications and the.fact that addendums were going out up until the last week, they felt they were unable to bid adequately. On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Brown, that the matter be continued to the June 24, 1974, meeting and authorize the staff to negotiate with Mr. Madonna for adjustments in his minimum bid. Motion carried unanimously. 10. Proposed consideration- by-;the City Council of a contract or agreement with the County for animal control services for the fiscal year 1974/75 was continued to the June 24, 1974 meeting as the County Administrative staff had not yet prepared the necessary contract documents. 11. At this time the City Council considered a request from Rita'WSullivan that the City Council guarantee a loan at the San Luis National Bank which is being sought by Mrs. O'Sullivan for the initiation of an educational day -care program for elementary school age children of working mothers in the City of San Luis Obispo. She stated that payment would be made by the Welfare Department to the mothers of children who would be attending the Center, but that due to the payment schedule of the Welfare Department, these payments , would not be received fora period of four to six weeks. Therefore, the Center had applied for a loan to continue and to start their operation for this period. The bank was willing to grant the loan to Mrs. O'Sullivan if the.City would be willing to guarantee such a loan by underwriting any loss or non - payment and"- the City taxpayers would pick up the difference.. Mrs. O'Sullivan stated that the Center had been working closely and received moral support from the Employment Development.Department and Council, the County Welfare Department, the County Schools Office, Headstart, the Career Opportunity Development Office, and the Human Relations Commission. She also stated that all the people in the community with whom she had spoken had emphasized the need for this type of program in the community, not only this summer, but during the school year. She stated that with the hopes the Center would become a model for continuing programs in the fall, that they had been working towards this program to provide comprehensive day care for elementary school age children of working parents. She concluded her appeal by stating that the Center was licensed by the State Department of Social Welfare as a day care center. They were a division of the Mandala :School, Inc., anon- profit corporation, and for this summer, they would be located at 761 .Broad Street, San Luis Obispo. She urged the City Council'to guarantee the loan. A. J. Shaw, Jr., City Attorney, stated that he had gone over this matter with 1 the.applicant, and stated he felt the City Council could probably find that both a public purpose and a municipal purpose would be served by the operation of a day care center by a pr.i:vate person, and therefore, the approach of getting a loan from the.bank which was guaranteed by the City.might be a more legal way to go. He concluded that it would be his recommendation that in connection with any arrangement, that a detailed agreement be prepared setting forth the proposed salaries of all persons involved in the operation of the program, the expected expenses, and providing guarantees from the Welfare Department as to the continued inspection and control of the program and payment of funds therefor, and also that the City be protected from any tort Fiability in connection with the operation of this program. 1 1 P M r 3 z J W. } U z O H ¢ d w Of IL W F- N O LU w w Cf w J D Q N ¢ CY z r o ON w 0 0 W M � T W fQ W C U N LLI CL Ir O U') Ln O 'o Mfg } O O O O O O Y O O O O O O LJ W Lr O Lr Lr C' D` U) N 10 LnO� rn r_ 7 R r N r7 ON M m -- r ON ^ N V m O• Lr d' D\ M N V r N N r N c C M M r M M r — N N N V N N � O O O O O O I O O O O O O c to w g Cl) c o o v v O M r O M co — W a r o N r rn r co - Ln V w o O M O\ �o ko N M M kO M M r w b9 w ¢ w w w } N N N O O O O O O LJ W Lr O Lr Lr C' D` U) N 10 rn r_ N O M N N O -- N a\ ^ V o m s N O CO- N N c C N O r N to C0 � — N N N V N N � 69 Z J ¢ 0 w z CD N W D Z O F- ¢ z N N N N W � W W O o — O o s Lli o O o O U U 2 U U Z I I IY I U to w g Cl) - W - 2: J — F- — W H W ¢ — I— �d - - o — w w w ¢ w w w Q S 2 IW- C� G Q Q Fw-- zd Ri � � z n l Cf z W W W D_' W W W W= LLI W J J J H ¢ O ¢ J J J — J J J O O O J z O O O J IL - I- I- 1- W t N W � } C 71 c CN � U cr T U N C X T= W U City Counci:I.Minutes June 17, 1974 Page 7 Mrs. .Pat Barlow, Chairwoman of the Human Relations Commission, stated that the Human Relations Commission whole - hearterly supported the child care center as proposed by Mrs. O'Sullivan, and Mrs. Barlow urged the City Council to guarantee the funds if the operation did not pay for itself. She urged the City Council to support the request of Mrs. O'Sullivan with a Council guarantee. ' On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Graham, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2619, A Resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo guaranteeing payment by City of losses incurred by Children's Center in operating summer day care program for A.F.D.C. children. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None 12. Memorandum from the City Attorney urging Council support of Senate Constitutional Amendment 52, regarding "quasi,judicial" decisions by local agencies. The purpose of the amendment was to overrule the Strumsky decision by the California Supreme Court earlier this year which placed a much greater burden upon local administrative agencies concerning the standard of judicial review of "quasi judicial" decisions by the local agencies where a "fundamental vested right" was involved. He felt that the decision of the court was nothing more than a further erosio %of the powers of a municipal corporation to control municipal affairs. On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Brown, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2620, A Resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo urging the State Legislature to approve SCA 52 to restore the substantial evidence test for Local Agency decisions. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None 13A. Communication from the Mass Transportation Committee requesting Council action on the following items: (1) The Committee requested the City to continue the contract bus operation for a total of two years, and that the City provide sufficient funds in the budget for this length--of study. (2) The Committee indicated that it wished to make minor changes in scheduling, hours, stops and promotion, without the delays inherent in having each action approved by the City Council. To accomplish this, the Committee proposed that the minutes of the Committee be sent to the Councilmen individually and that if there were no objections received within ten (10) days, the changes could be made at the discretion of the Committee. The City Council discussed the two requests of the Mass Transportation Committee and on motion of Mayor Schwartz, seconded by Councilman Graham, that the City Council continue the present plan of funding the bus system on a one -year basis. only, with an analysis by the Committee and City Council after three quarters of the contract year had passed. Motion carried, all ayes. On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Councilman Brown, that the City Council reject the request of the Mass Transportation Committee and continue the present policy of forwarding items to the City Council for consideration. Motion carried with Mayor Schwartz voting no. City Council-Minutes June 17., 1974 Page 8 (3) The Mass Transportation had a third request which was to change to a two bus operation between the hours of 10:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. on Sundays, effective September 15 and to add Memorial Day and Labor Day as official holidays, with the printing of the next schedule which would be in mid - September. On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Councilman Graham, that the City Council approve the request for two buses on Sunday and the designation of the two holidays on the next schedule. Motion carried. 13B. Memorandum from the Mass Transportation Committee regarding preparation and administration of a questionnaire on bus service. The Public Transportation System Questionnaire, which would be distributed to a representative sample of homes throughout the community would provide basic information for use by the Mass Transportation Committee in improving the level of bus service and would provide useful information in considering the proposals to be made by the consultant preparing the transportation study for the County. The Committee recommended that the questionnaire be distributed in the fall, that the computer work and representative sample would be selected by Cal Poly students working under the direction of Mr. Jones, but that the actual printing, distribution and collection of- information would be made at City expense and by City personnel. The analysis of the results would be conducted by Mr. Jones' class in transportat4;on at Cal Poly. It was estimated that the total City cost for the survey would be•less than $1,000.00. The matter was continued to the Council meeting of July 8, 1974, for a joint meeting with representatives of.the Mass Transportation Committee. 14. Robert Strong, Planning Director, submitted a proposal to the City Council for a. complete aerial survey of the planning area, a part of the General Plan .revision program, including 200 scale line -topo or orthophoto- contour maps showing existing buildings, topography and vegetation. Based on preliminary estimates on May 20, 1974, Mr. Strong requested that the Council allocate at least $13,500.00 in anticipation of the City contracting for such aerial photo and mapping service. He reported that he had received proposals from three firms: Pacific-Western Aerial Surveys - estimated cost, $19,610.00 Pugh -Nolte & Associates - estimated cost, $19,300.00, or an alternate, $11,800.00 Mark Hurd - estimated cost, $17,700.00 It was his recommendation that the least expensive proposal by Pugh - Nolte be accepted by the Council and that the Mayor be authorized to execute a contract for the alternate estimated at $11,800.00. On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Brown, the following Resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2628, A Resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo accepting a proposal for aerial photography and related photogrammetry from Pugh -Nolte & Associates. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: ' AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None City Council Minutes June 17, 1974 Page 9 15. Robert Strong, Planning Director, submitted a proposal to the City Council for supplemental staff and special consultants for the General Plan Revisions of the City of San Luis Obispo. He stated that the General Plan revision program involves $11,500.00 supplementary budget for special services related to the primary consultant study. The 'supplementary budget included: Retention of Meyer, Merriam & Associates, a local planning consultant firm familiar with the program and the community, ' to provide ass'ist'ance to City staff for special studies and data collection, allocating $4,000.00 for such services. He presented for the Council's consideration a letter agreement from Meyer, Merriam & Associates, allocating the $4,000.00 for special consultant studies as considered necessary and authorized by the Planning Director, with a further stipulation that no single project would expend more than $500.00 without further Council approval. The compensation to be based on actual time and expenses in accordance with the consultant's normal billing rate. On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Brown, that the City accept the recommendation of Robert Strong and authorize the letter agreement with Meyer, Merriam & Associates with a maximum expenditure total of $4,000.00. Motion carried, all ayes. Councilman John Brown left the meeting due to a possible conflict of interest on the next item. 16: Memorandum from'the City Engineer notifying the City Council that over the past several years, the City had expended a considerable amount of effort in inspecting the installation of underground utilities in the downtown area ' in order to assure the rights and conveniences of the public were protected. He stated that the City had been unable. to charge its time against the utility companies and had absorbed these costs within the various engineering budgets. He concluded that since the undergrounding of utilities would continue to be a major effort within the community for many years to come, he would like to suggest a modification of the City ordinance which would permit the City to assess a two percent (2 %) inspection fee against utility, companies whose work required the services of a City inspector. On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Graham, the following ordinance was introduced: ORDINANCE NO. 618., An Ordinance requiring payment of inspection and traffic control costs in connection with certain underground utility projects. Passed to print on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen =_.Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Brown Councilman John Brown returned to the City Council Chambers and took his 1 place at the Council table. 17. Communication from the California Association of the Physically Handi- capped (San,_Lui:s Obispo Chapter)requesting that the City undertake a survey of public facilities and undertake the complete removal of all barriers to the physically handicapped. Mr. Baldwin, C.A.P.H., supported the request, and submitted a list of goals and objectives of his organization to allow the physically handicapped to move about the City. He also asked that the City Council finance the purchase of a special bus developed for the handling of handicapped people, at an approximate cost of $30,000.00 City Council Minutes June 17, 1974 Page 10 Bob Bonds, representing the Disabledand Handicapped Students at Cal Poly, urged the City Council to proceed with ways and means to remove architectural barriers to-.the handicapped within the City of San Luis Obispo. Mrs. Wagner also spoke on behalf of the request of C.A.P.H. to eliminate. physical barriers to the handicapped residents of the community. On motion,.of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Graham, the following Resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2622, A Resolution.of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo authorizing a survey of public facilities to determine barriers to the physically handicapped. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None 18. :.'William Flory, Director of Parks 8 Recreation, submitted for the Council's consideration Contract Change Order No. .3, Karleskint -Crum, Inc., for Meadow Park, Phase III, an increase of $691.75. The Change Order was to consist of work at the shuffle board court: adding header board, top soil and grade; revise irrigation system at entry to bridge to function properly; finish grade flat area in right field of ball field and remove debris; and labor to add 16 turnbuckles on shelters and boom truck to hold; a total of $691.75. On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Mayor Schwartz,.Change Order No. 3 to Meadow Park, Phase III, was approved. Motion carried. . The City Council adjourned to Executive Session. On motion of Councilman Brown, seconded by Councilman Graham,.the meeting adjourned to 7:30 P. M., June 24, 1974. Motion carried. APPROVED: September 16, 1974 U J. H. itzpatrick, City Clerk 1 1 1