HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/06/1975L
Pledge
Roll Call
City Staff
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
_ CITY.OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 1975 - 7:.00.P.M.
CITY HALL
PRESENT:_ John C: Brown, Myron Graham,.T. Keith Gurnee,
Jesse Norris and Mayor Kenneth E. Schwartz
ABSENT: None
PRESENT: J.H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk; R.D. Miller, Administrative
Officer; A.J. Shaw, City Attorney; John Quirk, Assistant
Director of Water-Services; Robert Strong, Director of
Community Development .
1. On motion of Councilman Gurnee,.seconded by Councilman Brown
the following.ordinance was introduced: Ordinance No. 630 (1975 Series),
an urgency ordinance of the City of San Luis Obispo leasing City Jail
Facilities to the County of San Luis Obispo for juvenile detention purposes.
Ordinance passed on an urgency matter on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Gurnee, Brown, Norris and Mayor Schwartz
NOES: Councilman Graham
' ABSENT: None
2. Presentation of plans.and.specifications for CITY HALL REMODELLING.
David Williamson, Assistant Administrative Officer, stated that the architect
again could not submit the final plans and specifications.for.City Hall
Remodelling as the construction plans _._were only approximately 80 percent complete
at this time. He asked the Council to continue this matter until the plans
could be presented.
Ethan.Jennings, Architect, stated.the plans would be ready for plan check
later this week and submitted to the various City staff for review.
Councilman Gurnee asked the architect.what the current estimate was.
Ethan Jennings stated the current estimate was $379,000 which included the
basement, first floor.and Council Chamber remodellings with deductible alter-
nates for final Council decision.
Councilman.Gurnee stated that he-was having .second thoughts about proceeding
with the remodelling, and he hoped the-Council would consider -some modification
and alternatives to the proposal as submitted by.staff and architect.
Councilman Norris stated that he.too.hoped.the architect would consider
movable partitions for the basement to accommodate.change as the City
' reorganization became a- reality.
.On motion of-Councilman Brown,.seconded.by Councilman Norris that the matter
of.plans.and specifications for the City Hall Remodelling be.presented hopefully
at the January.20, 1975 meeting. .Motion-carried.
3. John Quirk,..acting Water Director, submitted a.report dealing
with the final payment.of.change . orders . to City Plan No..27- 73,-Water
Improvements for Tract 467.
City Council Minutes
January 6, 1975
Page 2
The report showed that for the outstanding change orders the City's share would
be $30,390.28 and the developer's share would be $18,930.02.
A.J. Shaw, City Attorney, cautioned the City Council regarding paying this
total change.order as suggested by the acting Water Director. He stated
this particular contract was under litigation, and the City Council should
know exactly where they stood on.these payments before authorizing payment.
Warren Dolezal, developer, asked that the City Council not.approve payment
as he felt.there were many errors involved in.the overpayment in his opinion,
which he felt totaled over $3,000. He then questioned various overhead items
in the.accounts submitted by the contractor, which he felt were contrary to
contract provisions.
Councilman Gurnee moved that this matter be continued to the City Council
meeting of.January 20,1975 for further input from staff. Motion lost for
lack.of a- second. .
Mr. Dolezal continued that in addition to his other statement, he felt there
were many other discrepancies.in prosecution of the contract and-he felt many
illegal.things were done in ordering change orders without proper documentation.
He urged the City Council not to make payments until they were sure of their
staff work.
On motion.of.Councilman Graham, seconded-by Councilman Norris that the City_
authorize payment of.90.percent of the recommended payment by.City staff with
the developer to also submit up to 90 percent, which would make the City's
share at this.time $27,351.25.and the developer's share $17,030.02. Motion
carried, all ayes.
4. John Quirk, acting Water Director, submitted a report to the City .
Council on tests made on the Berta Lang water meter,.3219 Broad.Street, which
found the.water meter to be within two percent of perfection. It was his opinion
that the meter was operating satisfactorily.
On motion of.Councilman Norris, seconded by Councilman Brown that the City
Council accept the staff report with the City to accept payment from Berta Lang
over a three -month period on the extremely high.bill. Motion.carried, all ayes..
S. The City staff as requested by the City Council at the December 16,
1974 meeting submitted a priority-list for level one facilities needed in
conjunction with projects in process prior to December 16, 1974 and which come
under the provisions of Ordinance No. 604 -A.
Item.No. 1'- E.A..French, 1173 Marsh Street, Flower Shop; F.E. McNamara,.
1900 Monterey Street, Motor Hotel; Pepe Delgado's, 1601 Monterey Street,
Restaurant Addition; Lee O'Rielly, 1741 Monterey Street,. Remodel Service
Station. The improvement would be a sewer line located on Marsh Street
between Broad and Chorro.Streets with.an estimated cost of improvement to
be $20,802.
Item No. 2 - Alta Vista School, 321 -401 North Chorro Street, Convert residence
to classroom;_Warren Dolezal, 200 North Santa Rosa Street,.Student Housing;.
Dr. Carlsson, 1041 Murray Street, Medical Office. The improvement would be
a sewer line located.on.Santa Rosa Street from the bend below Murray.Street
to Oak Street with an estimated cost of improvement to be $23,425.
Item No. 3 - Dr. Carlsson, Medical.Office. The improvement would be.a sewer
line located between Murray and Santa Rosa Streets through the Santa Rosa
Park with.an estimated cost of improvement to be $13,062.
Item.Nos. 4 4 5 - Pacific Home Improvement Center, 2034 Santa .Barbara Street,
Building Addition. The improvement.would be a sewer line located on Sandercock
Street from King to Hutton Streets and one on Hutton Street from High to
Sandercock with an estimated cost for.both improvements to be $15,579.
Item No. 6 - Harrison, Knorr.remodel railway express building for furniture..
manufacturing and sales. The improvement would be a sewer line located on
Islay Street from Beach to Chorro Streets with an estimated cost of improvement
to be $37,025.
D
1
1
City Council Minutes
January 6, 1975
Page 3
Item No. 7 - Vic Mori, 3350 Bullock Lane, Apartments. The improvement would be
a water line on Bullock Lane with an estimated cost of improvement to be
$7,500.
Councilman Gurnee stated that he was disappointed that building permits were
issued on priority items 4 and 5 just prior to the enactment of Ordinance 604 -A.
He felt this was allowed by the city staff with full knowledge that Ordinance 604
was moving along.
Mayor Scher stated that he had consistently supported the provisions of
Ordinance 604 -A, but he felt the problem was with staff attempting to determine what
is an overburdened facility, either the theoretical or the actual overburdening
of the facilities. He hoped the staff in the future would take time to really
analyze the problem and define whether they were theoretical or actual over-
burdening of facilities within the community.
Robert Binkele submitted a letter to the City Council asking that they proceed
with the necessary improvements on Monterey Street so that the new restaurant,
1865, the motel and the coffee shop could continue in operation. He felt there
had been a number of times when the sewer line had been clogged and sewage backed
into the properties.
D.F. Romero, City Engineer, stated that a study of this problem had been made
and that the problem at 1865 and the Ark Two Restaurant was not in the City's
main but were grease plugs in the Ark Two Restaurant line going to the City
which caused the backup of sewage into the property.
Warren Dolezal, developer of Woodside
200 North Santa Rosa Street, appeared
property be exempt from any condition
his approval through the various City
his understanding that the number one
line which would be required in Santa
Apartment Complex to be constructed at
before the City Council asking that this
of Ordinance 604 -A as he had been processing
committees since April of 1974. It was
problem under 604 -A was a parallel sewer
Rosa Street below Murray to Oak Street
before he could hookup his proposed apartment house. He felt that since he
was pursuing this development conscientiously since early 1974, he should have
some relief from being held up while the Council decided whether to make the
necessary public improvements.
A.J. Shaw, City Attorney, stated that the exceptions of Ordinance 604 -A were
set forth in the Municipal Code Section 2800.5. They did not authorize any
exemption procedures. He recommended that the various department heads and
City officials refrain from advising developers that the City Council could
grant exceptions to the provisions of Ordinance 604 -A.
Warren Dolezal again asked that the City Council exempt his property from the
provisions of Ordinance 604 -A, and that the City Council order the building
permit issued without holding him up through the provisions of Ordinance 604 -A.
The City Council by consensus stated that the provisions of Ordinance 604 -A
would be followed and that no exemptions would be given prior to development.
6A. Communication from John.Korelich and memorandum from D.F. Romero
concerning mission -style sidewalk at the Creamery on Higuera Street and recom-
mendation from David Williamson, Assistant Administrative Officer, concerning
the establishment of City policy on mission -style sidewalks, and a legal opinion
from A.J. Shaw, City Attorney, regarding the policy suggested by David Williamson
which may be contrary to public bidding requirements, be continued and referred
back to the City staff for a unified and clarified recommendation to the City
Council by the various staff departments.
7. Staff report on the proposed acquisition of Cal Trans' surplus property
at the corner of Broad and Santa Barbara Streets was continued to the meeting of
January 13, 1975.
8. Memorandum from Councilman T. Keith Gurnee reminding the City Council
of the Inconsistency of Zoning Densities within the present General Plan. He
reminded the City Council that nine months ago he had written concerning the
issue of residential densities permitted by the City's zoning ordinance which
exceeded densities described in the General Plan.
City Council Minutes
January 6, 1975.
Page 4
Councilman Gurnee stated.that.at.that time-he recommended.that.the Council. adopt
an.urgency ordinance bringing.those densities permitted by the zoning-
ordinance-into conformance with the General Plan. He felt this was urgently needed as
the present.situation was.in violation-of-State law allowing these inconsistencies
to continue.. Since the.original_discussion by the.City Council on.this matter,
the.Council.referred.this request to.the:Planning Commission which :subsequently
had..undertaken a new.General Plan study "and nothing was being done to correct
the zoning densities which were inconsistent with the General Plan. He felt that
by taking no action the.City_had given-approval for denser development. He
felt that - projects which had been approved that.had. densities 50.percent greater '
than those. allowed in the General Plan further add to the. problem,. he felt
the laxity.of applying the EIR protedure.and thelfailure of .the.City to
adopt new EIR procedures pursuant to- .State.law.had:removed.this tool fo"r.
assessing the impact of conflicting..densities in the City..
He..requested that the City Council consider the following three options:
1.- Adopt the interim -urgency.ordinance.recommended on May.6,.1974,
2. Adopt.:an.ordinance with section four stricken according to regular
.....ordinance procedure and time.schedules, or
3. Adopt the resolution requiring all development whose densities exceed
the General Plan to prepare an Environmental Impact Report.
He felt that these steps.should be taken. -for the following..reasons:
1. The conflict between the residential densities permitted in our zoning
....ordinance and the densities prescribed in the General Plan remained in
violation of State law.
2. Cities were coming to.realize.•that they could not put all their hopes
behind a general.planning process.without taking steps to assure.
that what was planned for was not cancelled out by insensitive
development -which occurred•in the.interim.
3. Failure to control.interim development had already-jeopardized
the City's expensive planning program. Overly dense developments
had been allowed since April when this matter was first brought
to.the Council's.-attention.
4. Overly dense developments .that had occurred had caused serious
negative changes in-the character of the City's neighborhoods.
He urged.the City Council -to take one of the steps in order.to get this problem
under.control.... He then submitted.an.urgency ordinance for the Council's con-
sideration, which would prohibit.certain residential development in-excess of
..the densities.shown on the General Plan pending completion of the.new zoning
ordinance., and if the.Council.would rather, a resolution adopting a policy
.requiring..the preparation of an..environmental impact report for all proposed
developments-with densities.in excess of limits in the current General Plan.
Robert Strong,.Planning Director, stated that in each case where the density
of_a.proposed project was-greater than the General Plan allows, the staff had
specifically noted this situation to-the Planning Commission for their consideration.
... He did.not.feel that the•problem was as grave as seen.by.Councilman Gurnee, since
the Commission . had not required EIR's in such instances. He .felt there were other
problems such as- inconsistency between zoning and General Plan uses which were of
more importance than the densities in.residential areas as described by Councilman
Gurnee.
David.Williamson,.Assistant Administrative.Officer, said that interim rezoning had
..been-deferred-in preference to comprehensive and coordinated General Plan and
Regulatory System revisions..
Councilman.Brown.stated he did..not_feel.there was any need.for...emergency action
by the_Council.at..this time. He felt. .the Council could.wait for the new.General
Plan to be-completed, and then bring-the-zoning ordinance into-compliance with the
plan.
Councilman-Graham. stated that it.was disconcerting for him.to find out that.
the.City. was still not consistent between the zoning ordinance and the General
Plan., particularly as far as "'residential densities were concerned. He felt
he could - support an emergency ordinance.in order to try to get some of these
things_under. control.
1
1
1
City Council Minutes
January 6, 1975
Page 5
Don Smith, Prefumo Canyon Road, felt the City should immediately comply with
State law on zoning, General Plan and the EIR provisions.
Councilman Norris stated that he saw no need for emergency action as he felt it
would be burdensome to both the residents and developers. He felt the City should
just move ahead with current policies and also move ahead with the preparation
of the new General Plan, which had been promised within the next two or three
months.
Councilman Gurnee again urged the City Council that they should comply with
existing adopted General Plan, and while he agreed with other Councilmen that
existing General Plan was not acceptable, he felt that it had been the official
General Plan adopted by the City Council.
Mayor Schwartz stated that while he philosophically agreed with the proposal
by Councilman Gurnee, he felt that practically the present City policy was correct,
while technically in violation of State law. He felt the City should move ahead
with-the development of the new General Plan as rapidly as possible. He felt that
the present staff policy and that of the Planning Commission to consider requiring
an EIR on all multiple housing development exceeding General Plan densities was
good and proper, and it would protect the City from overdevelopment.
Mrs. Robert Pederson, President of the League of Women Voters, urged the City
Council to adhere to the General Plan and the enforcement of zoning which
implements the plan. The League.was concerned that the proposals of the plan
revision due in June should not be determined by incremental zoning decisions
made in the interim. The League was strongly committed to the General Plan and
felt that changes which come about should be through the general planning
process, not through zoning which might be in conflict with the General Plan.
The updating program was not reason to disregard the present plan. Secondly,
the League of Women Voters were concerned with governmental responsibility
and respect for the law. Since State law required local zoning ordinances
to conform to the General Plan, the League hoped that at all times and under
all circumstances the City Council of San Luis Obispo would make every effort
to conform to State requirements.
On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Councilman Brown that the City
Council ask the Planning Commission to continue their present policy to con-
sider requiring an EIR for developments with densities over that allowed by the
General Plan.
Motion carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Norris and Brown and Mayor Schwartz
NOES: Councilmen Graham and Gurnee
ABSENT: None
At 9:10 p.m. Mayor Schwartz called a recess.
9:25 p.m. the meeting reconvened with all Councilmen present.
9. Walter Lambert, Chairman, Human Relations Commission, appeared
before the City Council stating that since the resignation of Bill Greenelsh
as the HRC Coordinator, the Commission had carefully considered the matter of
having a part -time coordinator and felt the City could only be best served if
they had a competent, full -time coordinator.
The HRC also felt that the annual salary currently authorized for the
coordinator ($11,000 per year) was inadequate and would become increasingly
less adequate as each month went by. The HRC requested that the City Council
authorize the HRC to advertise state -wide for applicants for a full -time
position as coordinator, with a starting salary of $1,244 a month with the
second step at the end of a year of $1,312 a month, and final step of $1,384 a
month at the end of two years service. This position to be effective on July 1,
1975. The HRC asked that the coordinator salary money still left in the budget
be allowed to pay for a new coordinator on a half -time basis for the completion
of the fiscal year and also the hiring of a full -time secretary to take care
of the business in the HRC office.
City Council Minutes
January 6, 1975
Page 6
Walter Lambert concluded that they are not asking for additional funds at this
time but only to re- allocate funds presently in the budget for a full -time
secretary to June 30, 1975 and a full -time coordinator for the months of April,
May and June, 1975.
Col. Giuffrida, HRC member, spoke on behalf of the HRC recommendation and also
submitted studies made by the HRC in preparing their recommendation to the City
Council. He felt that the real need to serve the people of San Luis Obispo could
only be accomplished by a full -time coordinator and not by a part -time person.
The City Council discussed with the HRC representatives their proposal for the
coordinator and secretary to June 30, 1975.
Ruth Miles, member of the HRC, also spoke in support of the full -time coordinator
but also felt that at the present time there was a need for a part -time coordinator
in order to keep the excellent program going started by Bill Greenelsh.
Councilman Gurnee suggested that the City Human Relations Commission might look
for the County Economic Opportunity Commission for coordination of City social
services. He felt that this might be the long -term solution to the Human Relation
problems and social service problems within the City, but that he would go along
with a part -time coordinator and secretary at least to the end of this present
fiscal year.
Councilman Norris felt that the City should staff a proper social and human
relations program for the citizens of San Luis Obispo. He hoped that the final
answer might be in cooperation with some other County or City agency, but that
he would support a part -time coordinator and secretarial help to the end of this
fiscal year.
Councilman Brown felt that the HRC should be supplied with secretarial services
and possibly a part -time coordinator, until a final plan could be evolved by the
Council and HRC members. He too would support a cooperative plan with the City
on a contract basis.
Councilman.Graham stated he was in support of the HRC request, and he felt the
City Council should authorize the HRC to proceed with hiring a secretary and
then come back with a proposal for a coordinator when their plans had been
completely jelled.
Mayor Schwartz felt that the City should continue with a contract coordinator
for more freedom of action. He felt the coordinator should be retained and a
secretary hired for every -day operations. He felt that a final answer was a
full -time staff for the social services of the City and for its citizens. He
continued he felt that the HRC should spend their budgeted funds the way they
saw fit and as requested by their Commission.
On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Mayor Schwartz the following resolution
was introduce F Resolution No. 2710 (1975 Series), a resolution of the Council of
the City of San Luis Obispo authorizing the position of temporary full -time sec-
retary for the Human Relations Commission and the hiring of a new coordinator for
the remainder of the fiscal year 1974/75.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
10. Raymond Kubly, Communications Manager., County of San Luis Obispo,
presented for the Council's consideration the 911 plan for San Luis Obispo
County and its incorporated cities. He explained that the 911 plan was a three -
digit emergency telephone number adopted by the telephone industry. This
number would be universal throughout California, and eventually the nation.
1
1
City Council Minutes
January 6, 1975
Page 7
Preparation of the 911 plan was in accordance with Assembly Bill 515, which
required the establishment of a uniform, emergency telephone service for
police, fire, medical and ambulance protection. He continued that the City
had the option of proposing to be the operator of the 911 system or of
participating with other cities in the County in a County- administered plan.
It was the opinion of the City's fire and police chiefs that the City should
cooperate with a County - administered program because the County was best
equipped to provide county -wide services and the cost to the City would be
less than if the City were designated as the agency and had to provide
county -wide service.
He stated that the timing would be as follows:
January 31, 1975 - all jurisdictions must submit a tentative plan to the
telephone company and to the communications division of the State.
January 31, 1977 - all jurisdictions must submit a final plan to the telephone
company and to the communications division for final implementation.
December 31, 1982 - final 911 plan to be implemented.
He continued that the cost of implementation was unknown and had been left
to each jurisdiction. Presumably each City in the County would pay its
proportionate share of the cost of the necessary facilities. It was also
possible that Federal funds may be made available. Assembly Bill 515 was
adopted prior to Senate Bill 90 and prior to the Legislature's current
policy of exploring cost implications prior to adoption of the additional
legislation.
Mr. Kubly then reviewed for the Council's information a lengthy, joint - powers
agreement between the cities and the County regarding the 911 communication
system.
The City Council discussed some of the ramifications of the joint - powers agreement
' with Mr. Kubly.
On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Councilman Brown the following
resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 2711 (1975 Series), a resolution
of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving a joint - powers agreement
with the County of San Luis Obispo regarding 911 Communications System.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
11. Wayne A. Peterson, Assistant City Engineer, submitted a report
prepared by the Engineering Department on traffic warrants for the following
intersections:
1. Santa Rosa and Walnut Streets. The Engineering Department
recommended that the Council consider installation of a
traffic signal at this intersection.
2. Santa Rosa and Montalban Streets. The Engineering Department
recommended that the Council consider installation of traffic
' signals at this intersection, with the cost of installation to
be shared with the Department of Transportation as Santa Rosa
Street is part of the State Highway System.
3. Madonna and Los Osos Valley Roads. No recommendation, further
studies wild' be maintained as the state warrants did not exist
at this intersection.
4. Chorro and Lincoln Streets. Again, traffic warrants for this
traffic signal were not met. Traffic counts were planned for
the Spring of 1975 for more Council information.
City Council:Minutes
January 6, 1975
Page 8
Kenneth W. Jones,was opposed to the proposal of the City Engineer to install
traffic signals on Santa Rosa and.Montalban Streets as he felt-it was unnecessary,
illogical; not needed, and a waste of the taxpayers money.
The report of the City Engineer's Office was ordered received and filed with
consideration at'the 1975/76 budget sessions.
12. Communication.from Roger and Martha Osbaldeston,.owners ' of - property
located outside the City of.San.,Luis-Obispo at the foot of Cuesta grade,
requesting-permission.to tap the City's raw water line from Cuesta Canyon.
which parallels Highway 101 for use-to-develop the ranch property recently
purchased.
John uirk „acting Water'Director, stated.that this pipeline "was not water
from Santa-Margarita Lake, but was raw water, untreated-and the City was
under direction of the County Health Department not to allow the.use of this
water for domestic purposes. He recommended that'the City .Coiincil "not allow
any connection.to this polluted, raw water supply.
On motion.of..Councilman Brown,.seconded by Councilman'Gtirriee the City Council
deny.the.request for services-outside the City for unhealthy, raw water.
Motion carried, all ayes.
13. Memorandum from William Flory, Director of Parks.£, Recreation,
recommending-.that until the.Master..Plan for Parks $ Recreation had been
completed._as:a part of the General.P.lan..studies; that the City Council
continue-to assess fees for park dedication purposes at the existing.$150
per.dwelling unit under the provisions of Ordinance No. 610. He.continued
that this.ordinance expired December 31, 1974 and recommended that the City
Council adopt.a.new ordinance containing the same provisions of Ordinance 610
through-December 31, 1975 at which time hopefully, the Master Plan.and the
General.P_lan of the-City would be completed and.an adequate study of park
costs.could..be.submitted to.the.City Council.
On motion -of Mayor Schwartz, seconded-by Councilman Brown the following
ordinance-was introduced:Ordinance No. 629 (1975 Series), an ordinance
of the City of San Luis Obispo amending the Subdivision Ordinance in the
Municipal:Code to limit the'in'lieu fees.for park dedication purposes to a
maximum of $150 per dwelling-unit until December 31, 1975.
Passed.to.print on the following.roll.call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Brown,.Graham, Norris and Mayor-Schwartz
NOES: Councilman Gurnee
ABSENT: None
On.motion.o£.Councilman Gurnee, ..seconded by Councilman Graham.consent items
C -1, C- 2,.0 -3, C -6, C -7; C -8, and C-11 were approved as recommended.
C -1 ... The claims against the City of San Luis Obispo were authorized
payment-subject to approval by the.Administrative Officer.
C -2 ..The City Council minutes of.November 11,1974 were acknowledged and
approved..
7.
C -3 The following contract-pay estimates were.approved for payment:
R. Baker Construction Co., Inc. Est. #3 $138,311.82
LOS OSOS VALLEY -OLD TOWN
TRANSMISSION LINE.
City Plan No. W73 -10
R. Burke Corp. Est. #3 24,039.04
STREET RECONSTRUCTION, Est. #4 FINAL 4,546.65
SERRANO & MISSION
City Plan No. 5 -74
1
1
1
City Council Minutes
January 6, 1975
Page 9
Contract Pay Estimates.(continued)
R. Burke Corp. Est. #2 11,274.07
PEPPER STREET RECONSTRUCTION Est'. #3 FINAL 1,736.38
City Plan No. 49774 - -
Conco General Engineering Est. #5 2,609.19
CULVERT REPLACEMENT. -OLD Est. #6 FINAL 9,374.46
GARDEN CREEK I LINCOLN I BROAD .C.C,O: #5 669.90
' City Plan•No. 16 -74
G.L. Douglas Construction Co. Est. #3 2,297.95
.WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS
City Plan No. W74 -2 -
Howie Concrete Est. #1 2,774.25
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
FLOOD:-PROTECTION-.-
City Plan No. 3 -75
Fred Julien $.Associates Est. #2 16,890.96
WATERLINE IMPROVEMENT
City Plan No. 6 -75, W74 -2
Madonna Construction Co. Est. #2 630.00
MEINECKE AVENUE SIDEWALK Est. #3 FINAL 1,112.75
City Plan No. 1 -75
Walter Bros. Const. Co.. Est.. #1 4,092.30
F.IR_E DEPARTMENT TRAINING SITE
IMPROVEMEN_ T
City Plan No. 2 -75
Madonna Construction Co. Est. #5 50,30.56
EDNA SADDLE.RESERVOIR
.City:Plan No. W73 -8
C -4 Letter from D.F. Romero to Central Coast Region of Water. Quality
Control.Board_requesting extension-for-six months in time schedule for submittal
of waste water disposal plan for San Luis Obispo City.
Two letters from Central Coast Region of Water Quality Control Board
regarding the same.
On motion-.of.Mayor Schwartz, seconded -by Councilman Norris that this.matter be
continued to a future study session. Motion carried.
C -5 Letter and resolution. from: San Luis Coastal Unified School District
regarding.early completion of sidewalk along Johnson Avenue between Lizz.ie
Street and San Luis Drive.
The City-Clerk-was instructed-to notify the-San Luis Coastal.-Unified School
District.-of-the time schedule for completion of the EIR on this project and
the construction time estimate.
C -6 On- motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman-Graham the
following.resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 2713 (1975 Series), a resolution
increasing the'1974/75 budget.-
' Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Brown, Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
City Council Minutes
January 6, 1975 .
Page 10
C -7 ._ The following salary step increase was approved effective
January 1, 1975:
Gene T. Johnson - Senior Engineering Aide
From Step 1 or $738 to Step 2 or $784
C -8 The requested sick leave for Stanley Mello in. excess of five.days
from Dr. Kettelkamp was approved.
C -9 Claim against the City of San Luis Obispo by C.R. Anderson for
bike damages.
On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Norris that the City
pay the claim to C.R. Anderson and file for reimbursement against the contractor.
Motion carried.
C -10 On motion of Mayor Schwartz, seconded by Councilman.Norris,.the following
resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 2712 (1975 Series), a resolution
of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving and authorizing the Mayor
to execute agreement with the California Department of Transportation for instal-
lation of traffic control signal systems on Broad Street..at.South -Santa Barbara
and at Orcutt Road.
Passed and-adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Brown; Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
C -11 R.D. Miller, Administrative Officer, announced the appointment of
Patrick J. Costello as Police Officer, effective 12/31/74 at $898 per month,
Step 1, subject to one year's probation.
C -12 R.D. Miller, Administrative Officer, announced the promotion of
Donald J. Sylvia to Fire Marshal at Step 4 or $1,328 per month, effective
January, 1, 1975 with.. consideration ,for . the. Sth.step in one year.
------------------------------------=--=------ ------------- =----------- - -- - --
B -1 The City Clerk reported on the following bids received for various
chemicals for the City of San Luis Obispo for the calendar year 1975 (see
attached exhibits.). Bids opened January.3,1975 at 1:00 p.m.
On motion.of Councilman Brown,-seconded by Councilman Norris the low bid of each
category.was accepted. _Motion carried, all ayes..
On motion of Councilman.Brown, seconded by Councilman Graham the ,meeting adjourned
to Monday, January 13, 1975.
APPROVED: May 19, 1975 .. _. °
Fitzpatrick, City Clerk
CD CD Cr o CD S CD 3 O ° O n I O o.
N n m n r n H. z • CD a I N N
N N (D w a aWn a(D O rtr I
G S: z N r a n n I H• +i
CY 7 o Q. c < r CD m a n CD
1 7
CD CD 1-h U. n w Cn C ;O I rr (D
n n Do +i N O 0 r• b 1 ::" H.
r+ r+ ++• CD 0 3 7' rt p 1 CD <
< F+• rt b CD 1 CD
rt rt CD Oq n a
o O �r r+ w
cn r+ O G 00 o--1 1
n n 1 00 r O
:r 7 ry w toZ I K
w w o w a rh
° ° r+ U• 1 0 ro
CIG OO O. CD C 1 Fi G
CD (D w N
(D E N S= CD N N N N I y r• r•
< r+ r1 CD N N N N 1 si N
(p rt O U• r v1 in v1 Ul I N
rj
rt .Y
O CD 1 r N•
`G r+ r -] -i --3 -] I
rt -j
c0 H. c I •< /0
w o CD liz I v
o N r+ O I r• �
a w O ° ° o
w �< +•h 0 r+ I c
N =• X 1 O z
N E b w CD I o y CD
E �s r• 00 r+, I =s a
H. F�• 0 CD P. I CD r-
r+ r+ CD +i 1 a c
?• r+ E N -64 {,q ff? 1+ IF -4 b3 I a 3
(D 0 H. r+ r r r O O CO to 1 'z] r
w ° r+ w o o O° A A 1m K z
w a' ¢. A o o I\ w e
C,n 0 00 O w o 0 o w o 0 10 w
rt CD r+ O O O ** I Z `< W
C>,. r• O 0 0 * I c
w ° r-h o o I r
< (D o 0 o I ti a
r+ w 1 w
E rh r O r r O
Fj 1•i CD a, CJ' 1 it r-'3
rt m � 1 m
CD w w 9 9 1 rt
N CD C CD r• r 1 O
00 A O A 3 B Cn w I TJ m _
r+ y F•• +i O N N O r c0 1 -j G'1 CO O
H. () O +•+ N CA fn A 1 O Z V n
n (D fl * * * 1 z -3 (n H.
CD r * 1 r+
rt
rt 1 O
CD CD rt 1 r rh
rh i O I
+tl •• j I O W
CD o w
0 G N 1
r+ Li I b
O r• r
O 7 64 'Al h7 fa4 fsi {r4 1 y 3 G
O r r � r r r 1p N•
MA O N
w rt r+ r O
CD r O r 00 ut A 1 -j W
CD 10 (A
O N * * I Z 'O
1-h N 1 O
1
N r+ ++•
CD
w w I
z cn O
r+ I pi
CL a.
rC w {a4 Ids' b4 GR CR 1 �] w
r %.< w N N N N I p
r N N V7 w A A I •-j n
r I a CD
E o O� Orn cn 1,j I r
w Fi r tp rn v, 00 1 E
c3 w V V 00 00 CT I m w
. "iz 1-+ I r r+
r rt w N o V Iv
`G
CD CD cn o a cn o
1
z Fri i
O r• I
F{ O 1
3 Fi I
P3 1
H• � I
r O I
E CD A W N r r 3
r Ir'O
r Icn
I Cn
I
EXHIBIT "A"
M "
"G Ran r
rWEn r
rr< W
Wra I
I N
N'zf
X 0
03 - o O
O N -3 O
O W w
w O r I
I '
'C O
C) N
N O D N
N vi a N
N CT O
O o r I
I O
O
m o
o En o
o c w
w r
r l
l (
(D r
•� �
� 3 =
= > m
m O
O cn a F
Ft w v I
I h
h E
r O
O O r =
= ++• m m
m O -3 w
w::1 1
1 Cp +
++• ++•
O .
.O' x C
CD r 7C C
CD - m =
=1 CD n 1
1 - 0
0 :j
'TJ Z
Z I
I-•• a r
r 0 r
r z n
n c I
I v w
w m
Fi F
Fi C
CD +i h
h C
Cn C
CD V 0 (
(D S n 0
0 CA Cn r
r Cn m I
I v r
r+
H. w
w w
w w
w N
N V I N
N H. S N
N O N
N r+ 3 I
I m H
H. C
0 n
n w
w n 0
0 •
•• tP1 n '
'• y m •
•• 7 4n 0
0 y o--I 1
1 U O
O H-
EXHIBIT "A"
z o
m
t- -<
I
b o
O
N Z
r•
(x'D
Ow+
1
CD r
m
w
0 r
�
M
r W
r
oD 0 M
1
r• H.
E
V]
N w cn
I °
rt
F" �- h
N o
I °
H. C
o r•
r CD
O
1 .'O
Q.
w
n r•
1
N N
coo
O
a m 0
CD
I
rc+
w CM PI
1
:1 m
CD
i
CD
�y
w ccn
r+
r N
0
7' H.
N r+
?
i
CD
rt
0 P.
o
o
con
I C
r 1-y
v
D
r O
CD
C)
O
I
O I•+I
rt
•n•---i
tn
I rt
1
c a
r O
I
r• r.
p
I
a N
(y
1
N 5
pa
I
I
OQ
C
N
1
CA
CD
Cp
1
r•
r-
{{}
I
N a
�. N.
CT
I D
w
0• ::r
0O0
1 tT3
•O --C
CD
I \
0
r
o
i p
z a
o rt
o
I Z
A. O
7
1
Cn
po
r0+
I
H
r. r.
I
r•
CD CD
m
m m
_
w
I
�
w
I
-
w
cn
Q
c O
::$
a
= c
o n1i
i m z
CD
00
i A m
w S
'
o S
(D
w
i
con
�+
O
W
7
O
1
r+
I
O
CD
N
1
r
I
co r+
1rt'jy
N
1
--1 :r
CD
`d
W CD
rte+
CD
w n
O
1
r+ r•
O
rt
I -3
r+
N
P.
W
1 a
o 0
w
r+
I \
CD
w
i O
a c
0
1 z
Z
1
r
y
I
G
�
1
r•
•,y
1
9
I
O
Ip
1
c
7
,
r+
I
N
I
�
r•
I a
1 r
n
ONO
I Cp
f)
b
rn
1 ,
0
°
°
a
I
R1
I
7
I
CD
1
N
I
S
r•
I
rt
I
�
1
1
N
G
O
.,.4
41
cd
U
.�
W
U
O)
P.
N
41
H
3
Q
U
C
cd
.D
0
O
u
U
Cd
1=
O
P.
N
A
O
N
O
J
C
Cd
W
O O.
>, o
+.1 0
s m
+•1
LO
O r�
41 O)
W
z
H M
a
o >,
a s.
T
co
U 7
G CPd
H �
a�
H >�
J Cd
'0
bo •ri
rr- W
N b
•rl N
e c
h O
W O
4 N
t
m
d
• A N
O) '0
U •ri
N A
f4
i+
N O
'c W
.r•1
A ,.y
H
0o Cd
G U
.,-I
3 d
O=
,I +1
H
O C
W •H
i
i
i
i
i
I
I
I
I
i
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
i
1
1
� I
H I
m i
JI
Q �
QI
FI
Z I
01
FI
\I
J I
dl
F I
01
FI
F Z
T O I
H I
w al
awe
W G i
z
01
FI
\1
W �
Q I
al
1
t
r1
FI
H I
FI
Z i
Q 1
O'
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
1
1
1
i
I
1
al
Wi
QI
QI
H I
m I
1
I
I
1
I
I
1
�4
N
>. >
. 1CD
"0
H \
O N
b 0
\ O
N iJ
r-
00
}t —4
O r-
4
4J
E �+
•ri N
G 3
•rl N
iC iC
CD O
N M
(f} 59
O O
O O
O O
�O O
N M
i
1
H T
N F+
> >
N H
b �
N \
N O
N
a
Cd G
N A
1•+
N N
•% iC
HIE
O O
O O
Ln N
N 01
M N
&4 :fi
O O
O O
Cn Cn
N m
M N
ioli-
F
O
O
H
Z
O
4H
C
o v
U N O)
U C u
Ci O d
a¢ 0
C6 aJ U
¢ m W
H O
C7
a In >
� N iJ
w c •�
u N U
E-
0
O
H
� Q
T U
U n N
¢ xa
a O O
En 0
¢ m a
F
Q O N
a a
M
z
0
H
F
O.
W
U
x
W
O
U
u
•ri
W
•ri
u
a
co
.,�j
00
F+
O
N
U
0
a� o
No
M
W t,%
O
N cu
Cd 4-4
4J Cd
N N
N N
4J N
O
N N
N Cd
0-0
F+ O
P. m
N N
> O
b �
r-, •ri
tf1 H
H >>
v U
N O
N
N u
W N
•ri z
W
0
}1 N
N p
Cd [s
N v
H
iJ
Cd N
to Cd
C TJ
41 b0
•r♦ C
f~ •ri
3 �
9 3
ai
U C!i
O (1)
.H
i+ W
a�
Tr-
A A
b0 s
P
> >,
•r4 P
to N
A •ri
A
N [�
.H
N
Cd
A �
Cd C
b Cd
>
010
Cd N W
G A E
O O i•+
N N
N
CON +.1
c •H
Cd
= N O
u u •H
•ri 41
4J P. CO
a.1 N W
u 41 i.
ry O
co IV) A 4J
}1 r-
(n O
a) = 6
U +•1
•ri 0 �-4
0.. E P.
N
X
U
I
M
Q
H
N
cd
O
U
LH J
W
Cd
N
Fa
Q]
A
a-1
N
T
cd
.0
O
m
N
fy
N
.0
K
T
u
W
O
v
N
O
N
N
H
[L
v
N
U
.J
}J
O
G
G
N
}1
+•1
s�
3
A
O
.0
,-,
ti
F
a�
41
41
W
W
Cd
+1
3
N
T
Cd
rO
O
M
A W
14 O
H a
•-r-4 f4 .l
A N
41 1--
N
N O
> •r4
O +J
(1) cu e
cw
Cd
u O
O 4
N
U E
N
•n Fi
a P
N
0
N O
U
•N O
S M
4 H}
0
0 0
0 0
cc
O O
O O
Cn Cn
\O O
N 0)
N M
M N
Is 64
ER &4
F
O
O
H
Z
O
4H
C
o v
U N O)
U C u
Ci O d
a¢ 0
C6 aJ U
¢ m W
H O
C7
a In >
� N iJ
w c •�
u N U
E-
0
O
H
� Q
T U
U n N
¢ xa
a O O
En 0
¢ m a
F
Q O N
a a
M
z
0
H
F
O.
W
U
x
W
O
U
u
•ri
W
•ri
u
a
co
.,�j
00
F+
O
N
U
0
a� o
No
M
W t,%
O
N cu
Cd 4-4
4J Cd
N N
N N
4J N
O
N N
N Cd
0-0
F+ O
P. m
N N
> O
b �
r-, •ri
tf1 H
H >>
v U
N O
N
N u
W N
•ri z
W
0
}1 N
N p
Cd [s
N v
H
iJ
Cd N
to Cd
C TJ
41 b0
•r♦ C
f~ •ri
3 �
9 3
ai
U C!i
O (1)
.H
i+ W
a�
Tr-
A A
b0 s
P
> >,
•r4 P
to N
A •ri
A
N [�
.H
N
Cd
A �
Cd C
b Cd
>
010
Cd N W
G A E
O O i•+
N N
N
CON +.1
c •H
Cd
= N O
u u •H
•ri 41
4J P. CO
a.1 N W
u 41 i.
ry O
co IV) A 4J
}1 r-
(n O
a) = 6
U +•1
•ri 0 �-4
0.. E P.
N
X
U
I
M
Q
H
N
cd
O
U
LH J
W
Cd
N
Fa
Q]
A
a-1
N
T
cd
.0
O
m
N
fy
N
.0
K
T
u
W
O
v
N
O
N
N
H
[L
v
N
U
.J
}J
O
G
G
N
}1
+•1
s�
3
A
O
.0
,-,
ti
F
a�
41
41
W
W
Cd
+1
3
N
T
Cd
rO
O
M
A W
14 O
H a
•-r-4 f4 .l
A N
41 1--
N
N O
> •r4
O +J
(1) cu e
cw
Cd
u O
O 4
N
U E
N
•n Fi
a P
N
0
N O
U
•N O
S M
4 H}
1
1
El
1
1
,
1
,
1
1
� I
00
�
I
-
00"a 2 1
rn
I
M
L1i
•rl
Q I
U
E, i
&
T
U
rti
a
CIS
,
a
b
1
(d
�.I
1
o
I
rr
U
I
U
I
"�
cd
I
3
1
01
N
a)
O
F 1
00 G.
E
¢.
v
o
al
P.
N
a
FI
00
0
oI
Tog-
F 1
In
4a
ul
1
0.
0.
O
a)
ca
1; O
I
N
LS
as
U) ^1
N
G
# 1,
Q
4a 4J
F z I
O N
O cd
1
C N
F
U
>> In
H 1
In i
a)
rl
•�rl M
ce W I t4 *O
LH
Uri
w0.1
�?
Q)
I
I
C
4 M
1
}.1
I
I
O i+
I
U
r
a)
r-, C
I
P. 04
W cd
I
G
[O. I
O
ctl U
C7 >>
\1
03
w 1
O
Q W
W •L7
F I
U U
cn •r,
I
bOS 4
r1 •r,
z
I
4J F-4
w W
I
0
o R.
�
1
�
v
,
w
o
,
+J o
o
v=i a�i
u
Q S1.
I
X U
O
1
41
O 1n
I
3 O
O b
EY-1
F
N
pa
I--I I
W N
04
Fz
I
M
cd 01
•r�i
Q I
.--I
� •t3
^� N
I
U
y •d
dI
.,� •rl
1
O ry
p
1
N
O j
iI
`" o
>
va
i
a"i
� �
W -1 -I
1
01
I
w O
C U
I
N
�
I
�
•r>l
I
U
Id ' i
a) 41
1
N 03
F :O
U
I
C Q
cd
Q) C
1
W 02
+1
�ba
W 1
O a) Q
p
VI M
O I
C4 •rl U
•rI
'O O
•rI O
F-I I
cV G
�I r•I
•r1
M 1
O N
4•4 •rl
4.1
I
Cl) m a>
3
C
u
I
W • U
O
>+
•rl •H
1
F O ba
I--I
M '-1
r
3 Q
rO-I U
I
M
W
'U E
O N
U
•r1 i-I
LL. V)
I
, r-I .a
W
R. z
1
1
El
1
K
O
P.
V1
A
O
N
0
� O
tH 4J
M '-I
O Cd
>1 M
Y [-
d)
A M
Y
Y cC
_ O
7•• Cd
ati
z
C) T
U
Cd
H •H
F •H
cn H
w n.
o -n
O G
v N
D O
H
0b
O •�
a m
W
O ul
H •d
a •�
� A
� o
�w
H
C
O
CA Cd
U
00
A Y
V)
•rl C
G.• •rl
H
w
O
r4 •1-1
W Cd
U
N W
•i U
(1) O
u PN
Sr
VI Y
' � 3
A
a�
00 U
o
•—I O
,—I U
❑O. Cd
X
W
C
O
H
m
a
F
0
F
O
Ji
Q i
O i
F i
C=.7 EO-•
W [Lcl
V. 0.
z
EO-
W
F
I, l
h
H
zF
Q
C
Cy
W
O
O
H
m
N
}
X
Cd
m
0
Y
U
z
Uz
O F
F
n
w H
^
ri
N
CN
M
V
O --
Va) 0
O
C Q
E
F
D
Cd
V) F
cd H
O
Y m
G =
3
7 cn
O
Fi
Y
00
O
O
N
Cd U
b
N
00
O
00
M
T
O
Y
$24
M
W
M
O
U U
"'I
01
�O
N
.—I
Cd
w
�^-.
V
M
Ln
7
x
O
N
cn
N
W
ro
�
O
Y W
Y
d)
q
Y
F
Y
Cd
•H O
co
b
z
-d
7,
C
G
Y
O
co
01
O
N
U
C
O
00
Y
cH
c, N
O
Y M
'-I
w
0J
1�
O
n Y
cn
O 0)
•H
M
M
M C
V
K .""I
Cd
64
6F}
t
69
N N
Cd
•ri
Cd O
O
0)
A
•1Z Y
Y
U
0
G
G
0 U
U
a
N
O
O
N
C •n
r
O
rn
Ln
a
7
W
In
o
co
O N
U)
O�
N
C1
O
a0 C
N O
m
N Y
Y
N
U
O
ccdd
E
O C
a
c-
U
Y U
M
O
0)
p
O
O
00
Cd
Y •,H
3
n
7
O
N
N
C
3 C.
M
M
m
c
° a. rq
.�
fsr
tfr
ttr
4 P.
t O
O
Y Y
M N
O
V)
U
Y A.
U •ri
U
w
Y
0) C
O
O O
r •r
1A C
E
v T
N
VI
Y
0) Cd
F
F
F
F
O O
• ^"o
FA
Y
A
ry
N
N
N
d3 N
Cd
O O
Y cd
} •rl
b0
t
N In
Y
A
0)
co
Cd
U �
� X
Y 00
Cd
w
O m
A
Y
00 O
r4
U
•r1 Y
cd
1=
0 tn
4� E—
a)
>
u
G d)
U I—I
f•I N
cd
O
w
d) �
tH
UY
C N
H Cd
A O
b Cd
4J
H W
a
W m
U
V1
�
x Y Q
H
O' •.••I U
W
U
En
N O
F
N H
A
N
U
N
UfnU
L�L17
u'J G
Ucn
U U
U.2.
Ur1
V] N
S
O N
I c�
VI
m
•• 4 •�
A
O N
Ln m
a
z
G.
a
l 3
a �
a
d
a.
V=i
Cl.
cn
no
o
o
0 H 0 o
EW.
o
^
o
.a
zQ
V) co
O
}`n
FmC
a-4
C
Q
N
ar
N
M
v
v
N +j
W
M
[n
O
W
v
v
in t O
X O
O
Z O Vi
Q O
V)
U
¢
ova.a.
w
��c°n
maw
>�a°