Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/16/1978City Council Minutes May 15, 1978 Page 3 SB 2042 Urban-.service areas, conflict resolution, LAFCO's. Support The City Clerk was directed to.notify the.cities legislative representative and other legislators of the City Council's action on.these bills. 4. There being no further business to come before the Council, the Mayor adjourned the meeting.at 2:15 p.m. APPROVED: June 20, 1978 . Fitzpatrick, City Clerk M I N U T E S , REGULAR MEETING_ OF THE CITY. COUNCIL CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO TUESDAY,:.':- MAYnI6;?1975 z:7-. 00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL Pledge Roll Call Councilmen PRESENT: Ron Dunin, Jeff Jorgensen, Steve Petterson and Mayor Kenneth E. Schwartz ABSENT: Allen Settle City Staff PRESENT: J.H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk; R.D. Miller, Administrative Officer; Dale Mitchell, City Attorney; Henry Engen, Director of Community Development; Terry Sanville, Planning Associate; Dan Smith, Senior Planner; D.F. Romero, Director of Public Services; Jim Stockton, Director of Parks and Recreation 1. The City Council held a public hearing to see the recommendation of the Planning Commission on the boundary determination between the R -1 and R -2 zoning on property lying between Lawrence Drive, Perkins Lane and Broad Street. 1 r Terry Sanville, Associate Planner, reported that when the`Council considered this area during the city -wide rezoning program, the display map did not clearly show the boundary between R -1 and R -2 zoning. Rather than attempt to determine the line at a public hearing, the City Council asked the Planning Commission to recommend a precise boundary for the General Plan. The Planning Commission recommended that the zoned boundary be left as it was and submitted a sketch map and recommended that the.General Plan be amended to reflect this. Terry Sanville stated that the city planning staff disagreed with the recommend- ation of the Planning Commission and they submitted an additional sketch map showing the existing zoning and two alternatives that they recommended to the City Council. He continued that the line recommended by staff was chosen because: 1) It was easily established on the ground since it connected.known points; 2) The area zoned R -2 (.47 acre) would allow about six units. It would not be desirable to have a large number of units with access on Broad Street this close to two other intersections. 3) This line was most literally consistent with the general plan map, which indicated only properties 100 to 150 deep along Broad Street designated medium - density residential; City Council Minutes May 16, 1978 Page 2 4) The area being rezoned from R -2 to R -1 (about 1.6 acres) would allow reasonable.lotting fot a single - family subdivision, served by a cul -de -sac connecting with an extension of Rockview Place. It was therefore recommended that the City Council accept Alternate 1 of the staff recommendation. J.H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk, submitted copies of a petition filed by 37 residents of the area which stated: "We the residents of the Lawrence Drive neighborhood are concerned about the possible permanent zoning of the property lying between Lawrence Drive, Perkins Lane; and Broad Street to R -2 zoning. We feel very strongly.that this property should be zoned R -1. For those of use living on the south side of Lawrence Drive, the property in question bears a direct relationship to the quality and value of our property. This is especially true since the land in question is on the uphill side of our property. Any development of this property will result in (1) loss of view of the open hills; (2) loss of privacy; (3) loss of valuable sunlight to our gardens; (4) increased noise.pollution; (5) decrease in wild bird life; and (6) possible drainage problems during heavy rains for Lawrence Drive residents. For these reasons we feel that development of the property in question should be consistent with the current land use element of the General Plan." Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open. Robert Nichols, 669 Lawrence Drive, appeared before the City Council, stating he supported the reduced area for R -2 zoning as recommended by the city staff. Roy Hoover, Rockview Place, also supported the reduced .R- 2.area as shown by the city staff. Timothy Beckwith, 641 Lawrence Drive, stated he wanted the zoning to comply with the General Plan, wanted less area devoted to R -2 and supported the more 1 R -1 uses on the property. He was opposed to multi -story buildings behind their property. Susan Bryant, 665 Lawrence Drive, would support a lesser density in the area, wished more R -1 and less R -2. Tom Shoot, Jr., 664 Lawrence Drive, agreed with the.:comments made by Tim Beckwith. Bill Malmon, 605.Lawrence Drive, stated he felt-the area should remain mostly in the R -1 uses,.did not support the growth concept, felt it would be damaging to the property owners below Lawrence Drive.. Bert Townsend,.Lawrence Drive, urged the City Council to leave as much of the property as possible zoned for R -1 uses. He supported the staff recommendation to the.alternate l or the lesser area for R -2 development. Leonard Lenger, surveyor representing the property owners, submitted to the Council'for their information, sketch maps of the proposed development of the property including the drainage,.roads, etc. He felt that the objections of the neighborhood were also taken care of in the developers' proposal and he urged that the City Council adopt the Planning Commission recommendation and leave the boundary between the.R -1 and R -2 as-recommended by the Commission. Mayor Schwartz declared the .public hearing closed. Terry Sanville again reviewed the recommendation of the city staff to move the boundary line closer to Broad Street to allow less R -2 uses. Councilman Dunin stated he would support the boundary proposal by the city staff. ,He preferred Alternate No. 2.. Councilman Petterson stated he, too., would support the General Plan as adopted or the staff Alternate No. 1. City Council Minutes May 16, 1978 Page 3 Councilman Jorgensen stated he would support.the sta_ff..recommendation for Alternate No. 1. Mayor Schwartz stated he would also support the General Plan adopting staff's Alternate No. 1. On motion.of Councilman Jorgensen, seconded by Councilman Petterson, the matter was referred.to.staff to..initiate.necessary legal action-to bring about a rezoning in accordance..with staff recommended.Alternate.l. Motion carried, all ayes, Councilman Settle absent. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on the recommendation of the Planning Commission to rezone land north and east of Buena Vista Avenue from R -1 (low density residential) to R -1 -S (low density residential, use permit required due to special consideration). Terry Sanville, Associate Planner_, presented the recommendation-of the Planning Commission..stating that at-a previous hearing, the City Council decided to zone the entire area under consideration R -1 -S while not adding the "S" designation.to one parcel included in the original Planning Commission recommendation. The Planning Commission reviewed the recommendations of the Council and staff and they both concurred that the "S" designation should not be added to the parcel on McCollum Street. Mayor Schwartz stepped down and left.the meeting due to a.possible conflict of interest. Councilman Petterson opened the public hearing. Don Stimpson, property owner, stated that he supported the Planning Commission recommendation for the "S"-designation as it would mean a hardship for him because he planned to develop each site separately and sensitively. J.H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk, presented a letter received from Robert N. and Vira June Tait objecting to any development of this property. Vice -Mayor Petterson closed the public hearing. Councilman Dunin stated he had no comments, he would support the R -1 -S recommendation. Councilman Jorgensen_.stated he would.vote for.R -1 -S but he.-did not-feel that the R -1 -S was the proper zone for the entire property due to the topography, etc. a portion of it should be zoned A /C.but in order to have the matter put aside as finished, he would support the recommended action. Also, should the rezoning fail, it would remain:R -1 and lack the protection afforded by the "S ". Councilman Petterson stated he would support the R -1 -S as recommended. On motion of Councilman Jorgensen, seconded by Councilman Petterson, the following ordinance was introduced: Ordinance No: 755 (1978.Series), an ordinance of the City of San.Luis Obispo.amending the official zone map of the city to rezone property north and east of Buena Vista Avenue. Introduced and passed and.to print on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Dunin, Jorgensen and Petterson NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Settle and Mayor Schwartz 3. The City Council considered the final-passage of Ordinance No. 754, (1978 Series), an ordinance amending the Municipal Code, Article III.V, Traffic Regulations, Chapter 15, Section 3215, changing the speed zone on Ferrini Road to 30 mph. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open. No one appeared before the City Council. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed. City Council Minutes May 16, 1978 Page 4 On motion.of. Councilman. Jorgensen.- seconded .by_Councilman.Dunin,.Ordinance No. 754 was introduced :for:final passage. Finally passed-on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Dunin, Jorgensen, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None 1 ABSENT: Councilman Settle 4. The City-Council considered a resolution supporting the County Board of Supervisors opposition to siting of LNG`Terminal at.Rattlesnake Canyon. Councilman Jorgensen presented for the Council's consideration a resolution of the.Council of:the City of San:Luis Obispo relative.to.the siting of liquefied natural gas terminal at Rattlesnake Canyon in San Luis Obispo - County and asking that the various agencies.involved place the lowest ranking or least preferred of all sitings for this plant. On motion of.Councilman Jorgensen, seconded.by Councilman.Petterson, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 3566 (1978 Series), a-resolution of.the:Council:of the City of San Luis Obispo relative to siting of liquefied natural gas terminal:at.Rattlesnake Canyon in San Luis Obispo County.:. . . . . Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Dunin, Jorgensen, Petterson and Mayorr5chwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Settle 1 5. The City Council considered a. staff:report.on the request-of LAFCO for the City Council to consider annexation to the Arroyo.Grande Resource Conservation District. Henry Engen, Director-of Community-Development, stated that he.had reviewed the proposal with the Zone,9 Flood Control District and:other agencies and listed the advantages and disadvantages to such annexation and stated that the conservation element of the city's general:plan - endorsed the need to support sound soil conservation practices. He continued that the general plan recognized the soil conservation-service which.would - provide staff to the local RCD as a primary vehicle for conservation providing technical assistance-through locally administered agencies.. The general plan.recommended that the advice of the Soil Conservation Service be sought on land use and related matters.1 Therefore, the Community Development staff recommended that the City Council notify LAFCO that they support the proposed annexation. Vic Montgomery appeared.before the City Council questioning the need for the cities to consider annexation to the.Arroyo Grande Conservation District list - ing several questions for the Council to consider, such as: who represents the city on the board,.what.are.their responsibilities, what.do they do, etc.? On motion of Councilman Jorgensen, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the City Council approved the annexation of the city to the Arroyo Grande Resource ' Conservation District and directed-the staff to prepare a-resolution with conditions cited under which the city would agree to annexation, such as name change, more..appropriate representation on the Board of Directors, etc. to be included in the.resolution. Motion carried. The matter was continued to the June 7, 1978 Council meeting. 6. Wayne.Peterson, City Engineer, submitted a lengthy report to the City Council in answer to the petition by residents of Rose.Avenue and Johnson Avenue for an improved drainage system. He reviewed the existing drainage system through the area and submitted proposals to.improve the City Council Minutes May 16, 1978 - Page 5 system with._ paralleling ..and /or..other..improvements. He continued that one of the problems with improving drainage in one. .portion of an area was that things happened.to areas below the improvement so that these drainage pro- jects must -be looked at in the long- range, not just to take care of-one problem. He presented.an alternate plan which would primarily involve the construction of a 54" pipe.from the Cox property to Johnson Avenue, easterly along Johnson Avenue to the 60" CMP which presently goes under the street. From this point the channelwould be adequate to carry the water to the beginning of the culvert at the Hacienda.Hospital property. Again,.to prevent flooding of the hospital and downstream properties, the project would include the con- struction of a 66" pipe to Southwood Drive and along Fernwood Drive to Orcutt Road and under Orcutt Road. This would include modifying the culvert at the end of the existing 54" pipe from behind Southwood Chalets under Orcutt Road to provide for a 100 year storm. As a_:more cost effective alternate to pro- viding for 100 year storm capacity, he recommended the construction of a 42'.' storm-drain-from the creek at the Cox's residence on Johnson Avenue to the existing 60" storm drain going under Johnson. This would provide a balanced design with all the drains in the area able to handle the same amount of water. In conjunction with this, he would install additional D.I.'s on Johnson Avenue to be sure that all water could be carried into the pipes. This system could handle a 5 year design storm. After discussion.with the City Council of the various alternatives presented, it was moved by Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Dunin, that the staff include this project and prioritize all the drainage projects in the 1978 -1979 CIP for budget study. Motion carried, all ayes. CONSENT ITEMS C -1 On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Dunin, to approve claims against the city for the month of May, 1978 and ordered paid subject to the approval of the.Administrative Officer. Motion carried. C -2 On motion of Councilman.Petterson, seconded by Councilman Dunin, to approve.the minutes of the Council.meetings.of March 21, 22, April 3, 4, 8, and 11, 1978 as presented. Motion carried. C -3 On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the following resolution was.introduced: Resolution No. 3567 (1978 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, stating the position of the.City in.regard to its continuing desire to acquire the Salinas Dam and related facilities. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: _Councilmen Dunin, Jorgensen, Petterson-and Mayor.Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Settle C -4 On motion of.Councilman Petterson, - seconded by.Councilman Dunin, the. amended wording-to the letter.to the State Water. Resources Control Board regarding the.Salinas Riber Project, well program, etc. was approved and the Mayor was authorized to sign the letter. Motion carried. C -5 On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 3568 (1978 Series), a a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo thanking the members of the Ad Hoc City -Cal Poly Housing Committee for their service. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Dunin, Jorgensen, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Settle 1 1 City Council Minutes May 16, 1978 Page 6 C -6 On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 3569 (1978 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis.Obispo approving and authorizing the.Mayor to execute a three -year agreement with the Cooperative Personnel Services of the State of California. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: .Councilmen Dunin, Jorgensen, Petterson and.Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Settle C -7 On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the Mayor was authorized to -sign the Joint Powers Agreement for the Central Coast Self- Insurance Fund to include liability coverage on behalf of the city. Motion carried. C -8 On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Dunin, communication from Priest, Richmond, Rossi and Montgomery, on behalf of the California Cooperage Co. for fire service to their new complex outside the City of San Luis Obispo was referred to the city staff for report and recommendation. Motion carried. C -9 On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Dunin,. the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 3570 (1978 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving standard details for construction of public works projects as prepared by the Engineer- ing Division of the Community Development Department. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Dunin, Jorgensen, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Settle C -10 On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the request from the Jack Residence Committee recommending that the City Council set aside $5,000.00 in 1978 -79 budget to continue rehabilitation projects at the Jack House was referred to budget deliberations. ?Motion carried. C -11 On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the request by Henry Alberts and the staff report dealing with noise regulations and unrelated persons, occupancy limits was continued to the June 7, 1978 Council meeting. Motion carried. C -12 The City Council considered the - Tentative Map of Tract No. 727, a 22 -unit residential condominium, 680 Chorro Street, C -H zone, Gann.Investments, developer. Dan Smith; Senior Planner, presented the recommendation of the Planning Commission which adopted the recommendation on a 5 -2 vote recommending approval of the subject tentative tract map subject . to the findings and conditions listed in the resolution for the tract. He continued that the project was originally approved as an apartment complex. The owner had now decided to sell the units individually as an air -space condominium.: The.underlying land --and building exteriors would be held in joint ownership and managed by a homeowners' associa- tion. He continued that the project was in substantial conformance with all standards of the R -4 zone and the General Plan. Because it was a condominium, it required tentative tract map approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. While building permits had -been issued and.construction started on the project as apartments, the city again was faced with the problem of having no adopted development standards for condominiums. Informal policy had been to require special amenities for condominium projects such as open space, recreational facilities, guest parking spaces, etc. For this condominium request, the developer had added a 15' square patio with two gas barbeques. Staff felt it was very minimum in meeting recreational facility needs. He conclu- ded that the project has no special open space or onsite guest parking spaces. Being on a corner lot, this site had more than usual street frontage and curb site parking potential for visitors. The staff felt that this project was suit- able for condominium conversion and offered significant amenities to occupants due to its nearness to downtown San Luis Obispo. City Council Minutes May 16, 1978 Page 7 Councilman Jorgensen stated he was opposed to allowing conversions of apartment units to condominiums. He felt the city should adopt standards and criteria before allowing such conversions. He continued that under the present city policy of having no criteria or standards, any and all apartments in the city could quickly be converted to condominiums with very low amenities and very low quality living conditions -. Councilman Petterson agreed stating that the city should not approve conversions from apartment units to condominium development. He felt that if a developer wished to develop condominium type tracts, they should be so developed from the first step through to the conclusion so that the City Council, Planning Commission and staff would be able to see what the quality of living would be in the development. .Councilman Dunin also agreed that this conversion was developed to low standards and poor amenities. He felt the city should not allow conversions of apartment houses until the city had adopted standards and criteria for such-development. Rob Strong, Planner for the project, spoke in support of the conversions from apartments to condominiums stating that the problem was caused primarily in delays by the city in adopting the General Plan and conforming to zoning in the last two years. He felt the development was adequate, although small and compact. He felt that this development was designed as a condominium in the beginning, but due to city constraints and delays, they applied for apartment house development. Dan Smith again stated that it was difficult for staff to approve condominiums with no adopted standards or criteria. D Mayor Schwartz felt the city should adopt some standards for construction of condominiums in the city with a higher level of amenities than rental - type apartments. He felt the Planning Commission should be directed to- prepare a standards and criteria for condominiums and condominium conversion for Council's consideration and approval. On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Jorgensen, Item C -12 was continued to June 7, 1978 for review of the project. Motion carried, all ayes. On motion of Councilman Jorgensen, seconded by Mayor Schwartz, staff was directed to prepare a moratorium ordinance on condominiums and condominium conversions for Council consideration in order to give the Council -an opportunity. to direct the Planning Commission to study and establish standards for such condominiums. The urgency ordinance to be presented.at the June 7, 1978 Council meeting which would include a public hearing for public input. Motion carried. On motion of Mayor Schwartz, seconded by Councilman Jorgensen, that the City Council direct the Planning Commission to study the condominium standards for new and conversion units with a report to the City Council within 60 days. Motion carried. The City Council directed the Community Development staff to notify.all applicants for condominium conversions known to the city staff of the Council's action and the possibility of adopting an urgency ordinance placing a moratorium on conversions. C -13 On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Petterson, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 3571 (1978 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo granting approval of Tentative Man for Minor-Subdivision No. 78 -09, located at 150 Cerro Romauldo. Passed and adopted on'the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Dunin, Jorgensen, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Settle 1 1 0 City Council Minutes May 16, 1978 Page 8 C -14 The City Council considered the Tentative Map for Minor Subdivision No. 78 -84 to adjust lot lines on two lots at 48 Buena Vista Avenue and 2390 Loomis Street R -1 -S zone pending. Dan Smith, Senior Planner, reported that the Planning Commission, on a 5 -2 vote, recommended Council approval of the tentative parcel map and the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Tentative Parcel Map for Minor Subdivision No. 78 -84 subject to findings and conditions listed in the resolution. He stated that their proposal was for a lot line adjustment to create two lots fronting on Buena Vista Street. There were presently two lots, one with frontage on Buena Vista Street and the other with frontage on Loomis Street. The intent was to construct two single family houses on the proposed lots where utilities were more easily provided. Neither of the two existing lots were provided with sewer or.water service. Lot 11 would require extension of water and sewer from Santa Ynez Avenue along..Loomis Street which was about 600' away. The Buena Vista Street lot could be sewered to a sewer main in Buena Vista although..all.or a portion of the sewage would have to be pumped to the sewer line because the lot dropped off drastically from the street grade. Water would have to be extended from a dead -end main several hundred feet down Buena Vista. He continued that both the existing lots were legal, nonconforming as to area. Lots 11 and 23 had an average cross slope of 48% and 39% respectively. The subdivision ordinance called for a lot size of two acres for-this low category. Lot 11 would be made larger by the lot line adjustment. 9600 square feet to 14,000 square feet, where Lot 23 would be reduced in area from 11,200 square feet to 6,800.square feet.. Dan Smith continued that the staff was of the opinion that the lot lines should not be adjusted and that they recommended to the Planning Commission that they deny the request. The reasons the staff were opposed to the lot line adjust- ment would be: 1) It would tend to encourage the participation of Lot 11 in the private street extension to solve utilities and access for all of the problem lots described above. 2) It would minimize the visual impact on the hillside by not permitting two prominent structures to be built side by side on Buena Vista Street. 3) Would make it unnecessary to permit a very substandard lot (23) from ..becoming even more so by reducing its area eventhough..,Lot 11 would increase commensurately. 4) Would prevent some future.request..to create a,third lot from the proposed lot which would have frontage both on Buena Vista and Loomis when utilities are in and arguments may run that it is land which could be developed. Rob Rossi, developer, spoke in support of the Planning Commission's recommend- ation which would allow the construction of two houses at.the Buena Vista front- age. Also, that the two property owners agreed with all the conditions of the Planning Commission for. this minor subdivision-and lot;line adjustment. He stated that the plan was to build a home for himself and for John King, that they would be built together so as to blend into the mountainside - and.not impact the visibility from other areas. He also stated that with the "S" designation, it would all have to be approved by the various city agencies. John King also spoke in support of the Planning Commission recommendations and stated that he accepted all the conditions of the Planning Commission. Councilman Dunin felt the property was difficult to develop. He felt it was a beautiful area and that maybe the city should purchase this property for open space putting in an overlook to look up into the valley. City Council Minutes May 16, 1978 Page 9 Councilman Petterson agreed that this was a problem property. He felt that 39% slopes would be very difficult to develop without large cuts and fills. He stated that he could not go along with the Planning Commission's recommendation. He felt that only one small house should be placed on the property. Councilman Jorgensen agreed and felt that this problem property would be difficult to develop into conventional housing and concurred with the other Councilmembers comments. He felt the lots were substandard for development, felt that Lot 23 was developable but dividing up the two lots, both became more difficult to develop. He felt that the City Council should take no action and leave the lots as they were. He felt the entire area should be redeveloped if all the property owners could get together on some redevelop- ment plan so that some access road could be made through this large undeveloped area. Mayor Schwartz agreed with the other Councilmen's comments. He felt that one house might be well done on this site but felt that two houses on Buena Vista would be one too many. On motion of Councilman Jorgensen, seconded by Mayor Schwartz,. that the staff be directed to prepare a resolution denying Minor Subdivision No. 78 -84 for the Council's consideration. C -15 On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 3572 (1978 Series), a resolution of the City Council of San Luis Obispo granting approval of Tenta- tive Map for Minor Subdivision No. 78 -85, located at 1348 Cecelia Court. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Dunin, Jorgensen, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None 1 ABSENT: Councilman Settle C -16 On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 3573 (1978 Series), a resolution approving an agreement between the City and John E. King, Carole D. King, Charles Vincent Crooks and Laura H. Crooks for a common access drive- way to Augusta Street. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Dunin, Jorgensen and Petterson NOES: Mayor Schwartz ABSENT: Councilman Settle On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman "Dunin,. the following.res:olut16n was introduced : - _Resolution No: 3574 (1978_ Series) -a resolution approving an` agreement between-" the: city and John E. King,- Carole D. King, Charles Vincent Crooks and Laura H. Crooks for a common access drive- way to Helena Street. AYES: Councilmen Dunin, Jorgensen and Petterson NOES: Mayor Schwartz ABSENT: Councilman Settle C -17 On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the recommendation from the Planning Commission regarding the closing of Osos Street to through traffic at Santa Barbara Avenue was ordered received and filed. Motion carried. City Council Minutes May 16, 1978 Page 10 C -18 On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the request of the County Economic Opportunity Commission to use a portion of Meadow Park for a Farmer's Market was referred to city staff for investi- gation and report to the Council. Motion carried. C -19 On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the report from the Public Services Department on.sewer backup claims against the city from July, 1973 through the present time was ordered received and 1 filed. Motion-.carried. C -20 On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Dunin, project schedules dated May 1, 1978 were ordered received and filed: Motion carried. There being no further business to come before the City Council, the Mayor adjourned the meeting at 10:40 p.m. to Tuesday, May 23, 1978 at 12:10 p.m. APPROVED: July 18, 1978,+/�'� T li a rick, City Clerk --------------------------------------------------------------------------- M I N U T E S ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1978 - 12:10 P.M. HEARING ROOM, CITY HALL, 990 PALM STREET City Clerk, J.H. Fitzpatrick, adjourned the meeting of the City Council due to a lack of quorum. APPROVED: July.18, 1978��_�� 57E Fitzpatrick, City Clerk -=------------------------------------------------------------------------- M I N U T E S ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO TUESDAY; MAY 30, 1978 - 7:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 990 PALM STREET SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA Roll Call Councilmen. PRESENT: Ron Dunin, Jeff Jorgensen, Steve Petterson, and Mayor Kenneth E. Schwartz ABSENT: Allen Settle ' City Staff PRESENT: J.H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk; R.D. Miller, Administrative Officer; Allen Grimes, City Attorney; Henry Engen, Director of Community Development; Terry Sanville, Associate Planner 1. The City Council held a public hearing to consider the recommended Final Environmental Impact Report for the Ferrini Annexation and Prezoning Project.