Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/17/1979M I N U T E S ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO TUESDAY, APRIL 17, 1979 - 4:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL; 990 PALM STREET Roll Call Councilmember PRESENT: Melanie Billig, Alan Bond, Ron Dunin, Jeff Jorgensen and Mayor Cooper ABSENT: None ,City-Staff PRESENT: Leland.Walton,.City Administrative.Officer; J.H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk;.George Thacker, City Attorney; Henry Engen, Community Development Director; Wayne Peterson, City Engineer; Roger Neuman, Police Chief; D.F. Romero, Public Services Director. E -1: Dave Garth, Executive Manager.of.the.Chamber of Commerce, asked that the City Council adopt.an emergency resolution for a possible problem which might take place during the Poly Royal weekend if the gas supply-situation continues. He stated that the Chamber.of Commerce would apply to the Cali- fornia Office of Fuel Allotment fora-hardship allotment of fuel for Poly Royal so that tourists coming here would not be stranded. On motion of Councilman Jorgensen ,.seconded.by.Councilwoman Billig, the following resolution was introduced:. Resolution No. 3828 (1979 Series) , a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo requesting a..special allocation of gasoline to support Poly Royal celebration on April 27 and 28, 1979. Passed and adopted : -.on..the..following.roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Jorgensen, Billig, Bond, Dunin and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: -None 1. On motion .of.Councilman.Bond,,.aeconded by.Councilwoman Billig, the request by:Lucille Janis se::that..the.City'of -San: Luis Obispo adopt the.:song of San Luis.Obispo written by: her -. was .-referred.to:the..Promotional Coordinating Committee and Chamber of Commerce for.review and comment. Motion carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Bond, Billig, Dunin, Jorgensen and Mayor Cooper NOES: None. j ABSENT: None The City.Clerk was directed to. prepare ':a..letter.of.appreciation for the song for Mrs. Janisse. 2. D.F._ Romero ,.Director.of...Public.Services and staff - member for the Mass Transportation Committee, reviewed.for the City Council the actions -taken by the M.T:C. at their meeting of April 9, 1979, only two of which require Council action. Item 1:- Mid -day Pass Program D.F. Romero continued that it was.the consensus of the M.T.C::to continue to adhere to•its.policy of opposing a-subsidy to any special-group.such . as senior citizens, students, or pool, but should instead follow policies which treat City Council Minutes April 17, 1979 - 4:00 P.M. Page 2 all transportation-disadvantages on the same basis. He continued that the subsidy per rider is in the magnitude of .75p to $1.00 per rider, considering the new contract, and suggested that the M.T.C. was cautious in granting special privileges, thus further increasing city operational costs. He then presented the action of the Mass Transportation Committee which was: The M.T.C. hereby recommends that the Mid -day Pass Program continue as it is presently constituted with no changes in , the hours, fare structure, and no change to reflect a special privilege for one particular group of citizens. Hank Wollweber, president of the San Luis Obispo Senior Citizens, asked that the City Council consider continuing their pass program at the reduced rate. He asked, on behalf of the seniors, that the council extend the time from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., rather than the 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., as recom- mended at the present time. He continued that he felt the staff had not properly advertised the program and had not properly briefed the drivers on how to operate this particular program. Shirley Ferguson, nutritional advisor at the Anderson Senior Citizens' Hotel, asked for unlimited use of discount bus pass for senior citizens to better serve the senior citizens of San Luis Obispo who need this type of transpor- tation to get to and from the hotel for health and nutritional programs. She felt that the present time schedule was very limited to seniors due to limited time available for use to go to the hospital for appointments and treatments. She felt this would be a good program to get seniors into the main stream of the community. She concluded her statements by saying that there is a great need for this program in the community because those who use it, need it badly. Art Jack stated that a study of the M.C.T. figures show that only about one or two passes are used at any one time on any one bus.. He does not see how , these few riders would be detrimental to the buses operation_ He also did not see a grant of special privileges to allow seniors a reduced fare on the bus. He continued that most public transportation systems grant special rates for seniors, either free or for a nominal fee. He also asked the council not to extend the reduced bus rate for a six month period but to allow it to continue to June 30, 1980. He also asked that the City Council for a senior citizen use from 8:30 a.m. to 4:50 p.m. He would prefer that the City Council allow unlimited use for seniors, but that he would go along with a limited pass if necessary. D.F. Romero again reminded the City Council that the Mass Transit Committee policy was not to subsidize any elements of the population of the city. Walter Rice reviewed the activities to date, particularly as to subsidizing ridership on the bus system. He stated that the mid -day pass program was established in order to have the buses running full during slack periods. Rose Barger spoke in support of extending the times for the Mid -day Pass Program from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. She urged the City Council to support the seniors' program. Councilman Dunin stated he would support the request of the seniors' Mid -day Pass Program at a reduced bus rate. He felt the city has always found ways to subsidize other activities in the city and he felt that this was not any special privilege for any particular group. ' Councilwoman Billig stated she too would support the use of an extended time for use of a discount pass, at least 30 minutes before the existing starting and ending times. Councilman Jorgensen stated that he would support an unlimited pass for senior citizens if it were legally permissable to do so. Councilman Bond stated he would also agree with an unlimited-use of the bus pass for seniors. City Council Minutes April 17, 1979 - 4:00 P.M. Page 3 On motion.of Counailman.Jorgensen, seconded by Councilman Dunin, that the City Council adopt the concept of unlimited use of senior citizens' passes on the bus system to be implemented as soon as.possible with the city staff to check the legality of such an action and to define "seniors" and to report back at the next meeting. Staff to report in six months as to the effects of the program on the bus operation. I Motion carried on the following roll.call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Jorgensen, Dunin, Bond, Billig and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: None George Thacher, City Attorney, was to look into the legality of subsidies, etc. Item 2: Discussion of Cuesta Shuttle Service. D.F. Romero, Public Services Director, presented two proposals regarding the Cuesta Shuttle Service. Each of them indicated an annual operating cost of approximately $20,000. He explained that the latest approach had been for the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, and Cuesta College, each to pay 1/3 of the operating cost of the system. He stated that the Mass Transit Committee made two motions: 1. "The.M.T.C. hereby recommends that the city continue to participate in the Cuesta Shuttle Service." 2. "The M.T.C. hereby recommends that the city negotiate on the basis of 1/3 of the cost of the Cuesta Shuttle Service being shared each by Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo County, and San Luis Obispo City." ' On motion.of Councilman-Jorgensen, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the City Council concurred in the recommendation of the Mass Transit Committee that they wish to continue the Questa Shuttle Service and would be most happy to pay 1/3 of the cost if the other two agencies would pay their share. Motion carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Jorgensen, Dunin, Billig , Bond and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: None Dave Romero then announced that since the preparation of the agenda for the meeting, he had received.a letter from Cuesta College saying that they would pay 1/3 of the anticipated cost of the shuttle service to the college. 3. On motion.of.Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilwoman Billig, the following resolution.was introduced: Resolution No. 3815 (1979 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo adopting the city's Affirmative Action Program. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: ' AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Billig, Bond, Jorgensen and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: None 4. A request from the County of San Luis Obispo that the City of San Luis Obispo approve a merger of the Library Administration function into the City Library building on Morro Street. Also, that the agreement between the city and the county authorize reducing the hours to 54 hours per week for the building to be open. City Council Minutes April 17, 1979 - 4:00 P.M. Page 4 Councilman..Jorgensen stated he was-opposed to reducing.the hours.at the library from those agreed upon in the 1972 guidelines. He hoped that there would be dialogue.between the city and county to settle this matter of hours lost, library space, and.parking. He felt the hours could not be reduced below 54. Councilman Dunin agreed with Councilman Jorgensen's comments. Marge Kirby, County Administrator's office staff, again reviewed the entire proposal by the county for the City of San Luis Obispo's Library. Dale Perkins, County Library Director, explained the county's proposal and the savings they hoped to make in moving the administration of the county library to the city library building with the total cost to the County of San Luis Obispo. After discussion, it was moved by..Councilman Jorgensen, and seconded by Councilman Bond, that the city staff be directed to prepare the necessary documents approving structural.modifications of the city library building to accommodate the library administration and, further, extend the agreement for a three -year period contingent on a final agreement between the county and city on a site for a joint development of a city /county library building construction. Motion carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: .Councilmembers.Jorgensen, Bond, Billig,.Dunin.and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: None On motion of.Councilman Bond, seconded by Councilman-Jorgensen, that in amending the agreement for.the library operation., that the hours.only be I reduced to 54 hours.per week. Motion carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Bond, Jorgensen, Billig, Dunin and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: None 5. On motion.of Councilman Jorgensen, seconded-by Mayor Cooper, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 3816 (1979 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving amendment no. 1 to agreement (Human Relations Coordinator Employment Contract - Part - Time). Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers-Jorgensen, Mayor.Cooper, Billig, Bond and Dunin NOES: None ABSENT: None 6. A communication from-the Planning Commission informing the City Council that they have reviewed the draft Capital Improvement Program.for fiscal year 1979 -1980 and made six series of recommendations for the council's consideration. On motion of Councilman Jorgensen, seconded by Councilman Dunin, that the Planning Commission's C.I.P. recommendations be referred to a future study session at budget time. Motion carried.on.the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Jorgensen, Dunin, Billig, Bond and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: None City Council Minutes April 17, 1979 - 4:00 P.M. Page 5 7. On motion of-Councilman Jorgensen, seconded by Councilman Bond, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 3817 (1979 Series), a resolution of the-Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving an agree- ment between the city and Bobby Kober for operation of the golf-course conces- sion for six months, beginning April 1, 1979. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: ' AYES: Councilmembers.Jorgensen, Bond, Billig, Dunin and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: None 8. On motion of.Councilman Jorgensen, seconded by Councilman Bond, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 3818 (1979 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving an agree- ment between the city and Bobby Kober for extension of the golf professional agreement for six months, beginning April 1, 1979. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Jorgensen, Bond, Billig, Dunin and Mayor Cooper NOES: None W- 1.0RMARE 65I - On motion of Councilman.- Jorgensen, seconded by Councilman Bond,-that the City Council direct an evaluation study to be completed at the time that the present contract would expire. ' Motion carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmember,s Jorgensen, Bond, Billig, Dunin and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: None 9. A request from Phil Humphrey, Vice - President of Cal -Coast Construction, asking for council direction regarding the conditions-of their subdivision agreement for Tract 592 on whether to plan willow trees as required by that agreement. On motion of Councilman Bond,.seconded by Councilwoman Billig, the developers of Tract 592 were directed to proceed with the planting of-the willows in accordance with the adopted subdivision agreement. Motion carried on.the.following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Bond, Billig, Jorgensen and Mayor Cooper NOES: Councilmember Dunin ABSENT: None The meeting.adjourned . at 6;06 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., April-17, 1979. Approved by the City Council 6/5/79 jwiak , tipatrick, City Clerk City Council..Minutes April 17, 1979 - 7:30 P.M. Page 1 M I N U T E S REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO TUESDAY, APRIL 17, 1979 - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 990 PALM STREET Roll Call Councilmembers PRESENT: Melanie Billig, Alan Bond, Ron Dunin, Jeff Jorgensen and Mayor Lynn Cooper ABSENT: None City Staff PRESENT: Leland Walton, City Administrative Officer; J-H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk; George Thacher, City Attorney; Henry Engen, Community Development Director; Wayne Peterson, City Engineer; Jim Stockton, Parks and Recreation Director; Roger Neuman, Police Chief. 1. The Gold Coast Chorus of the Society for the Preservation and Encourage- ment of Barber Shop Quartet Singing in America, Inc., appeared before the City Council and sang two songs in commemoration of their 41st anniversary. The City Council then proceeded to complete the consent item portion of the 4:00 p.m. City Council meeting. C -1. On motion-of-Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Bond, claims ' against the city for the month of April, 1979, were approved subject to the approval of the Administrative Officer. Motion carried. C -2. On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Bond, minutes of the following City Council meetings were approved: February 13, 1979 February 20, 1979 February 27, 1979 March 5, 1979 Motion carried. C -3. On motion-of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Bond, the following resolution was introduced:. Resolution No. 3819 (1979 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo (1) granting additional time to file a final map for Tract 718; and (2) adding a condi- tion to those contained in Resolution 3555 as amended. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Bond, Billig, Jorgensen and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ' ABSENT: None Mayor Cooper stepped down from the council desk due to a possible conflict of interest. C -4. On motion-of-Councilwoman Billig, seconded by Councilman Jorgensen, the following resolution was introduced:-.Resolution-No. 3820 (1979 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo granting additional time to file the final map for Minor Subdivision 77 -357. City Council Minutes April 17, 1979 - 7:30 P.M. Page 2 Passed and.adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers.Billig, Jorgensen, Bond and Dunin NOES: None ABSENT:. Mayor Cooper IMayor Cooper-returned to the meeting. C -5. On motion -of Councilman.Dunin, seconded by Councilman Bond, the following resolution was introduced:- Resolution No. 3821 (1979 Series), a resolution establishing salary ranges for employee classifications, specifying methods of advancement and superseding previous salary resolutions in conflict therewith. Passed and adopted on the following.roll.call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dunin,.Bond, Billig, Jorgensen and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: None C -6. On motion-of-Councilman-Dunin, seconded by Councilman Bond, the following resolution-was introduced: Resolution No. 3822 (1979 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo authorizing a transfer of revenue sharing and capital improvement fund appropriations for the 1978/1979 fiscal year (Marsh /Nipomo Storm Drain). Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Bond, Billig, Jorgensen and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: None C -7. On motion.of Councilman Dunin, seconded by_Councilman Bond, Ordinance No. 804, an ordinance of the City of San Luis Obispo amending Municipal Code Article IX, Chapter 8, Flood Damage Prevention Regulations, Sections 9804, 9805, 9812, and 9813, was introduced for final passage. Finally passed on the following.roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Bond, Billig, Jorgensen and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: None C -8. On motion of.Councilman.Dunin, seconded by Councilman Bond, claim against the city by Paul Rarshner, Ralph Kettlekamp and R. Neal in the amount of $15 each to cover damages of installing a new water pump when theirs burned out during the emptying of a city water tank, was denied. Motion carried. ' C -9. Project.Schedules for the period ending March 31, 1979, were ordered received and filed. BID ITEMS B -1. The City Clerk reported-on the bids received for the WATERLINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, City Plan No's. C -15 and C -17, bid estimates $34,681 and $19,248 plus 13% contingencies for a total of $60,940, continued from the April 3, 1979 council meeting. City Council Minutes April 17, 1979 - 7:30 p.m. Page 3 Leland Walton, City Administrative Officer,-recommends that the City Council accept the low bid of Fred Julien and Associates in the amount of $62,619.74 stating he would extend the bid award in order to allow the developers time to deposit their money with the city. On motion of Councilwoman Billig, seconded by Councilman Jorgensen, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 3823 (1979 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo accepting the bid ' and awarding a contract for the Waterline Improvement Project to Fred Julien and Associates, for a total of $62,619.74. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Billig, Jorgensen, Bond, Dunin and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: None B -2. The City Clerk reported on the following bids received for the SEWER LINE IMPROVEMENTS, City Plan No's. B -44 and C -16, continued from the April 3, 1979, council meeting. Leland Walton, City Administrative Officer, recommended that the bids be accepted from the low bidder with the understanding that the contract would hold off until the funds have been deposited. If the funds are not deposited on this sewer line, he asked permission to proceed with the sewer line contract in Santa Rosa Street which is partly from the state highway going through Santa Rosa Park. On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Mayor Cooper, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 3824 (1979 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis.Obispo accepting.the bid and awarding a contract for the Sewer Line Improvements, City Plan No. C -16, to Fred Julien and Associates subject to the receipt of funds, or if no funds are received from the developer right away, authorization is given to build the portion in Santa Rosa Street with city funds. Passed and adopted on.the following roll call vote AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Mayor Cooper, Billig, Bond and Jorgensen NOES: None ABSENT: None 2. At this time the City Council held a public hearing to consider extending Ordinance No. 795, an interim urgency ordinance establishing a moratorium on the conversion of multiple family dwellings to condominiums Henry Engen, Community Development Director, stated that the Planning Commis- sion had reviewed the conversion of family dwellings to condominiums and stated that lacking an adopted housing element, they would have to ask that the City Council.continue the emergency ordinance for an additional eight months. On motion of Councilman Jorgensen , seconded by Councilwoman Billig, the following ordinance was introduced: Ordinance No. 805 (1979 Series), an interim urgency ordinance of the City of San Luis Obispo extending Urgency Ordinance No. 795 establishing a moratorium on the conversion of multiple family dwellings to condominiums. Mayor Cooper declared the public hearing open. No one appeared before the City Council. Mayor Cooper declared the public hearing closed. City Council Minutes April 17, 1979 - 7:30 p.m. Page 4 The interim urgency ordinance was passed -and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Jorgensen, Billig, Bond, Dunin and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: None 3. At this time the City Council considered the - adoption of the Housing Element of the General Plan following public hearings held January 23, February 13, and February 27, 1979, at which point the public hearing portion was closed. Mayor Cooper opened the meeting to public input. Rosemary Green asked for clarification by staff of Problem No. 4. Mayor Cooper closed the meeting to public input. Henry Engen briefly discussed.the Housing Element Discussion Guide prepared by the Community Development Staff following the public hearings held by the City Council. On motion of Councilman-Jorgensen, seconded by Councilman Bond, the matter was continued to 12:10 p.m. Monday, April 23, 1979. Motion carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Jorgensen, Bond, Billig, Dunin and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: None 4. At this time the City Council held a public hearing to-consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission-to approve the South Higuera Commerce Park Specific Plan and its Environmental Impact Report. Terry Sanville, Senior Planner, reported that the Planning Commission approved the Commerce Park Specific Plan and certified its E.I.R. The Specific Plan was prepared by Robert Strong working as a consultant for the affected property owners. The city planning staff -also helped prepare the plan. The Environ- mental Impact Report was written by WESTEC Services Inc. under contract with the city, and paid for by the applicant. At the two meetings in March, the Planning Commission studied both reports and made the following recommendations to the City Council: 1. Certify that the plan's Environmental Impact Report is adequate and meets the reporting requirements of the city and state E.I.R. guidelines. 2. Adopt the Higuera Commerce Park Specific Plan. The plan should also include-the four additional items spelled out by the staff and Planning Commission. The following recommended additions to the Specific Plan were also made: 1. The circulation.portion of the.specific plan should be expanded to include a bike path on-the east side of Higuera Street. Since there is a 42' wide landscaped area proposed on the east side of the street, there.appears to.be room to locate an 8 -foot "separated" bike path under the cypress trees. 2. The intersection.of the frontage road and the main entrance way to the Commerce Park should be redesigned. The planning staff recommends that design #2 shown on page 46 of the draft E.I.R., or something similar to it, be followed. City Council Minutes April 17, 1979 - 7:30 p.m. Page 5 3. The circulation section-of the specific plan should talk about traffic signals. When the Phase I area is subdivided, the developer should be asked_to.participate in paying for the signal at Tank Farm Road. Participation in_signalizing_Prado Road will depend on future traffic conditions. It may be a condition of subdividing the Phase II area. 4. The specific plan should indicate that some additional landscaping (planting of trees) along Higuera-Street will be needed to fill in the gaps. This-will create a.uniform.and. attractive landscaped area. Terry Sanville continued-that the proposed South Higuera Commerce Park was an 80 -acre specific planning area located on the east side of Higuera Street between Prado Road and Higuera Street. This land was annexed to the city in 1972. At that time the zoning was R -1. The city's general plan also desig- nated the property as a suitable location for housing. In January, 1977, the City Council adopted a new general plan land use element. The 1977 plan changed the allowed use of the property from housing to service commercial/ light industrial. The area was no longer considered a good location for housing because of its proximity to the.county airport and the potential for aircraft noise and safety problems. In July, 1977, the property was rezoned from R -1 to CH -SP, thereby requiring a specific plan. This was done to make the city's zoning map consistent with the long -range general plan. Both the Planning Commission and the City Council recommended that a specific plan be required before the area was further subdivided or developed. One of the reasons why the city required a specific plan was that the planning area was the largest piece of vacant land in San Luis Obispo that is zoned for service commercial use. The adoption of a sepcific plan should result in the superior design of future subdivisions and development projects. State law says that the city is responsible.for preparing and adopting specific plans. A specific plan can address a wide variety of topics. The commerce park plan focuses on the master planning of land uses, streets, and public utilities. Rob Strong, consultant for.the property owner and designer of the specific plan for the Higuera Commerce Park,_reveiwed for the City Council the specific plan, its purposes, etc. in order to give the council a background of what was proposed before considering either the E.I.R. or specific plan. Bill Foley, representing WESTEC.Services Inc., the city's E.I.R. consultant, reviewed for.the City Council the various elements that made up the E.I.R. for the Higuera Commerce Park Specific Plan, Tract No. 703. He stated that this report was being submitted to the City of San Luis Obispo in accordance with the procedural guidelines.for implementation of the CEQUA and the State of California.guidelines.for_ the preparation and evaluation of environmental impact reports under the California.Environmental Quality Act of 1970. He then reviewed in detail Chapter 1.3, Summary of Findings, giving the finding and the suggested mitigation for the following items: Geotechnical Hydrological Biological Land Use Archaeological and Aesthetics Historic References Circulation and Traffic Noise Air Quality Public.Facilities and Utilities Any and all growth inducing impacts The City Council discussed with Mr. Strong and Mr. Foley, the consultants, various points made in their presentation. Mayor Cooper opened the public hearing, and with the council's consent, limited the comments to only the E.I.R. 1 1 1 City Council Minutes April 17, 1979 - 7:30 p.m. Page 6 Jamie Lopes, Buchon Street,.did not feel that.the E.I.R..addressed.the secondary problems of this-project which was-the-lack of housing in the city as he felt the General Plan..suggested.a.lesser.and lesser amount of housing would be provided and more and more business. He felt that the E.I.R. was wrong in guessing that employees for this development would come from within the city. He stated that as a professional planner,.this was a wrong assumption. As unemployment-is-low in the city, all new workers would come from outside. He felt the E.I.R. was mute on the amount of housing needed to house the employees of this development. He also did not-feel that the E.I.R. addressed the extra business needed to serve the employees of the complex. All in all, he felt the E.I.R. was weak on growth inducing effects this development would have on the City of San Luis Obispo. Pete Evans agreed with the comments.of the prior speaker, D. Lopes. He also felt the E.I.R. was inadequate and did not address the impact that this devel- opment would have on the City of San Luis Obispo. Joe Gibbs felt that the E.I.R. was inconsistent with'the General Plan con- servation element. Robert E. Hibshaw, Sr., property owner.of the proposed development, discussed the growth inducing effect of the proposed Commerce Park. He reviewd the survey on Capitolio Way which reviewed.the number.of developments and the-number of employees and how many employees had come.from outside the Ciyt of San Luis Obispo. He stated that of the ten businesses employing 103 employees, only 7 had come from outside the city limits. He felt-that this type of proposal he was developing for the city was needed to give the local people employment and that this devel- opment would.generate no new.employees but would support the people already living in the city. He felt that the E.I.R. was factual and should be accepted by the City Council as recommended by the Planning Commission. Mark Elliott, Higuera Street, spoke against the E.I.R. as he felt it did not address the loss.of. excellent farm-land that this development would be covering with buildings-and concrete. He also felt that the E.I.R. was mute on the potential pollution that this development would make in the city. Mark Brazil felt that the E.I.R. was adequate, felt the community needed oppor- tunities for employment, and that the present city policy does not allow jobs for local citizens. 9:10 p.m. Mayor.Cooper declared a recess. 9:20 p.m. the City Council reconvened with all councilmembers present. Liz Fisher did not feel that the E.I.R. adequately-addressed the traffic circu- lation problem. She felt that it lacked decisions and was inadequate and should not be accepted. Mayor Cooper declared the public hearing closed. George Thacher, City Attorney, then reviewed for the City Council the elements necessary to approve the E.I.R. He felt that the City Council should certify, if they can, that the project E.I.R. was completed in compliance with the California Environmental.Quality Act, State and City E.I.R. Guidelines, and that it was sufficient to describe the environmental impacts of the South Higuera Commerce Park Specific Plan. Terry Sanville, Senior Planner, suggested that the City Council approve the project E.I.R. and allow the city staff to prepare mitigating measures for hearing later on the project. Councilwoman Billig objected to the suggestion of adopting the E.I.R. without addressing the mitigating measures. She also felt that the public has the right to know when the hearing on this project would be advertised. Councilman Jorgensen felt that the E.I.R. does not address the impact of this project adequately and does not show certain problems that must be mitigated at the time the project is considered. City CounciL Minutes April 17, 1979 - 7:30 p.m. Page.7 On motion of Councilman Jorgensen, seconded by Councilman Bond, Resolution No. 3825 (1979 Series), a resolution of the City of San Luis Obispo City Council certifying the Environmental Impact Report for the South Higuera Commerce Park Specific Plan. Passed and adopted on the following-roll call vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Jorgnesen, Bond, Billig, Dunin and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: None Mayor Cooper then announced that the City Council would now hold a public hearing on the Specific Plan for the South Higuera Commerce Park. Terry Sanville, Senior Planner, again reviewed the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the City Council to adopt the Specific Plan subject to the four additional conditions. 1. Bicycle Routes 2. Interior Streets 3. Traffic Signals 4. Additional Landscaping Terry Sanville concluded his remarks by stating that the planning staff had recommended to the Planning Commission -that additional action should be taken by the developer of the Specific Plan to mitigate noise increases on Prado Road and Higuera Street, but he reported that Planning Commission had rejected the staff recommendation on this matter. Mayor Cooper declared the public hearing open. Rob Strong, consultant for the property owner, again-reviewed the'Specific Plan for the South Higuera Commerce Park. He stated that basically the Commerce Park Specific Plan was intended to more precisely describe what was happening on the land rather the general plan such as appropriate land uses, provisions for streets, drainage, and utility improvements, design, development standards which would insure an orderly and timely implementation of the General Plan. He stated that basically the 80 acres had been divded into 4 subareas. The portion near the Prado Road and Higuera Street intersection was proposed as a home improvement complex for building materials, sales and service, special service commercial district, vehicle sales and service center including car, truck, motorcycle, etc. and the balance for general purpose, commercial service and light industrial uses. The property would develop first with 50 acres being developed and subsequently phase II or 30 acres would.be brought into development. Charles Meissner, property owner adjacent to'the development, objected to the proposed development on two issues. 1) loss of his road by the developer, access from Higuera Street, 2) he felt that this land was the finest farming land in the county and he hated to see it covered over with concrete, etc. He said he and his family had been farming this land for many, many years and that he did not feel it should be taken out of farm production. Ms. , Environmental Center of San Luis Obispo, was opposed to the proposed development due to the loss of what she felt was.the finest farm land in the county and-she did not-want to see it covered with..buildings, etc. She felt that the United States needs to grow food for future generations and that the question for this council was, are they going to support farm land or business and venture. Joe Lattimure was opposed tb the project due to the loss of good farmland. Robert Hibsham, Jr., property owner's son, felt that their development was going to provide jobs and employment for the people already here in San Luis Obispo. The plan was not to bring in new people but support those already here. 1 1 1 City Council Minutes April 17, 1979 - 7:30 p.m. Page 8 Mayor Cooper closed_the.public hearing. Terry Sanville again listed.areas.that were not resolved at.the Planning Commission level which included, 1) services, 2) water uses, and 3) the phasing program. Councilman Jorgensen reviewed for the City Council.the list.of errors caused ' by poor planning by the city over the--years that effected.particular property. He felt the subject property should never have been-annexed, never should have been zoned for residential or-now for light industrial. He felt this was prime agricultural land and that no development should ever take place on it in order to protect its use. He felt it should remain an agricultural use. He felt the proposed project was growth inducing and would require a lot of water. He also felt it would have a negative effect on the adjacent residential living if it was approved. He did not feel that the project addressed things such as the noise control or the phasing of development to mitigate growth. Councilman -Bond agreed that this property should be left as agriculture and not for development. Councilman.Dunin stated he would support urbanization of this property, would support the project,.he felt it was needed as the city needed jobs, he would support phasing of the development in order to control pressures as housing, and circulation should be looked into. He also felt the water use should be controlled and that only low.water use type industry be allowed to develop. He did not support the requirement for a large wall to mitigate noise from the adjacent property. He would..support.the adoption of a specific plan with amendments to be addressed by the Planning Commission. Councilwoman Billig stated she would -not be able to support the.approval of the development for commercial and.industrial use over this fine agricultural area. She felt that the planning was bad in the general area within the city.. She felt the city.has allowed a terrible mix of residential uses, commercial.and industrial uses in this area which has always been used strictly for agriculture and that type.of.service. She felt that the circulation and water and sewer services-were still -to be answered in.this plan. She was opposed to adding more confusion of land uses in this area. Mayor Cooper stated.he could.suppo= the Planning Commission recommendation to approve this project. He felt the staff and Planning Commission had answered all the problems, had mitigated them, and he would support the plan. On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Mayor Cooper, that the City Council introduce a resolution adopting the South Higuera Commerce Park Specific Plan. Motion lost on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dunin and Mayor Cooper _NOES: Councilmembers Billig, Bond and Jorgensen ABSENT: None On motion.of Councilman Jorgensen, seconded by Councilwoman Billig, that the city staff be directed to.initiate.a General Plan amendment to A/C or con- sistent zoning in-order to continue agriculture use.of the property and 1 clarify the inconsistencies in the.General.Plan as noted in the E.I.R. Motion carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Jorgensen, Bond and Billig NOES: Councilmembers Dunin and Mayor Cooper ABSENT: None City Council Minutes April 17, 1979 - 7:30 P.M. Page 9 5. At this time the City Council held a public hearing to. consider an appeal of -a Planning Commission decision to require a focused environmental impact report on the changes to the proposed Terrace Hill planned development project, Cuesta Valley Properties, appellant. Dan Smith, Associate Planner, stated that the applicant, Cuesta Valley Properties, was appealing the decision.of the Planning Commis, ion-to--require a- focused EIR to address revisions to areas 3 and 4 of the subject development plan. , He then reviewed the long history of this particular development of Terrace Hill by this company. He said that originally, the development plan was granted a negative declaration with no E.I.R. required by the City Council. This was done at an appeal hearing initiated by interested citizens who disagreed with the original Planning Commission decision do grant a negative declaration. The negative declaration was granted based on technical infor- mation called an initial environmental study prepared by consultants and submitted by the applicant. It was also based on the fact that an environ- mental imapct statement was certified for the Bishop Street extension. After the negative declaration.was granted, the applicant decided to make changes to areas 3 and 4 of this plan. The changes are as follows: Area 3 - Thirteen of the eighteen housing.units proposed in this area were moved from the top of the hill to the southeast face of the hill. This change was made because the applicant chose to withdraw a general plan amendment request required to place houses -on Terrace Hill above the 460 foot elevation which is the water service limit in this area. Another reason for the change was to avoid breaking the profile of the hill top using the face of the hill as a visual backdrop for the houses making them less conspicuous. This change required reallignment of a private street which varied from the existing graded road. It proposed to place the street and houses in the steeper parts of the hill requiring additional grading some of which was extended to blend cuts into the hill and remediate existing grading scars on the hill. Area 4 - Housing units were.moved lower.on the face of the hill. The proposed ' private street was moved to a lower portion of the slope and.was broken into two cul -de -sacs with an emergency access connection. The housing units were also placed on both sides of the street to break up the linear building mass characteristic of the original area 4 plan. Revisions to area 4 were done-after the initial Planning-Commis ion-.meeting in response to Planning Commission comments. A_Community Development Depart- ment staff and City Attorney decision required the revised plan to go back to the Environmental Review Committee to determine if the revisions to the plan would cause significant adverse impacts to the environment not evaluated in the negative declaration for the original project. Staff prepared an initial study which was supplemented by a new geologic report from Mr. Robert Williams of Central Coast Engineering. Based on the new geologic report and findings by staff that the aesthetics of the plan had improved by virtue of the revisions a negative declaration was recommended. Other issues were no.t.analyzed in depth by staff because the revisions to the plan involved the same number of units with the same access points, drainage configuration and noise exposure. The revisions vary little in most respects from the original plan except for the position of houses on the hill which affects geology and. aesthetics. However, the-Planning Commission, by a vote of 5 -2, passed a motion finding that the revisions to areas 3 and 4 may cause significant adverse environmental impacts and require.preparation of a focused E.I.R. The E.I.R. is to focus on the following concerns: 1. Traffic and Circulation 2. Nosie 3. Geologic and Seismic Hazard 4. Storm Drainage 5. Aesthetics The motion included a directive to have the E.I.R. consultant compile all initial study material.previously prepared to be included in the focused E.I.R. City Council Minutes April 17, 1979 - 7:30 P.M. Page 10 Dan Smith concluded by stating .that the Community Development staff.stands by its original-recommendation-that a_ negative declaration be granted for the plan because the.revisions appear to affect only concerns of geologic stability and aesthetics... The geology has been reviewed by the consulting soils engineer and - the.plan.is- found to be feasible with - appropriate grading techniques -and-aesthetics which staff ..feels have been. improved over the original plan. He stated that it should be noted that because a negative declaration-was-granted for the original.plan, an E.I.R. determination may be made for revisions to the plan.only.. Determination.is whether the revisions cause significant-adverse impacts to..the environment not found in the original plan which was granted a negative declaration. George Thacher, City Attorney, discussed with the council the history.of the particular project and the environmental - impact report.starting with the negative declaration by the City Council through the present action by the Planning Commission.for a focused E.I.R. on the amendments to the plan. Mayor Cooper.declared the public.hearing open. Andrew.Merriam, representing Merriam, Deasy and Whisenant, Inc., consultants for the property owners, appeared before the City Council on behalf of his appeal. He stated that_ the.appeal -to the council to deny.the requirement of the Planning Commission for a focused E.I.R. on the changes to the Terrace Hill Planned Development for the following reasons: 1. The hearing process generated..specific answers to the two - issues generated by changes made from the previously exempt plan: aesthetics, and soils and geology. 2. By admission of_the.majority.of -the Planning Commissioners, adequate information-was-supplied for the Planning Commission-decision-process. In other words, the_EIR.would not generate new information required to ' make an informed decision. 3. The need for public-review and -input is well met by the 8 to 12 hearings that this project will have before any final approval.is granted. 4. The six to eight month delay will not serve to benefit the city, the . .general public, the developer or the future homeowners. 5. Finally, while the state.guidelines do allow.EIRs where there is a "substantial body of opinion ".which- considers the effects to be negative, no such "substantial body of opinion" manifested itself in the hearing stating that the changes proposed by the applicant actually increased environmental impacts. Finally, he stated that the developer was being penalized for showing good- will in attempting to improve a project which-had previously received a negative declaration.. He believed that this was an abuse of the.EIR process to require a.formal document which is modified in response -to the hearing process. , Bob Vessley, civil engineer at Merriam,-Deasy and Whisenant, presented a slide show to illustrate how the new.changes to the development were proposed and how it would fit.in -the overall scheme. ' Robert Williams, Central Coast Engineering,-consulting engineer, reviewed for the City Council geological studies made by.his firm on the Terrace Hill project. Andrew.Merriam again-appeared.-before the- council.reminding the new City Council that the old council-had given -the development a negative declaration and now the Planning Commission wants to go back and get a focused EIR. Don O'Connor, Rich Court, felt that before the project went any further, an EIR should be.required.. He felt.that.if an EIR had been required and prepared at the beginning, possibly the fears of-the neighborhood would have been mitigated. But without a full EIR, the neighbors have many concerns that City-Council Minutes April 17, 1979 - 7:30 p.m. Page 11 the developers and staff.-have not.-attempted to answer—He felt the project will have a significant .effect.on the.environment, not only.on the immediate neighborhood,_but.also_ the city in general. Ted Graves, Sylvia Court, urged the City Council to require a focused EIR on this project. He.felt.that.the hill is unstable and that.an.EIR focused on geology and seismic hazards.would.mitigate.his and his neighbor's worries and concerns. He felt an EIR was necessary. .Liz.Fisher.felt an EIR was needed for this project. Mr. Radabaugh, 1254 Drive, urged a focused EIR in order to mitigate concerns of the neighborhood on.the project. He felt an unbiased study was needed. Enrico.Bongio, Sierra -Way, urged. -an EIR. in order to see what effect the latest amendments by French would have on the neighborhood. He felt a focused EIR was needed in order for the council to make a decision.with full knowledge of potential probelms. He felt the matter of drainage has not been answered and the hill is full of water and is constantly moving with landslides, etc. contrary to previous statements that the hill is solid rock. He asked -the council to come.and see erosion, slides, etc. He begged.the council to have an EIR as- .recommended by.the Planning Commission David Rodie supported a.focused EIR for this project for full information for the public-on the development. Joe Roschaud, Ella and Osos Streets, support an EIR for this project. Shannon - Richards, Rachel Street, supported.an EIR for the project. Eddie Woodward._San.Mateo Drive, supported a.focused EIR for -full information of potential problems. Burt Forbes- supported.a focused EIR. He had concerns for.neighborhood protection He felt an EIR was needed.to protect -the property owner so he would have full knowledge and could mitigate measures that the EIR brought out. He also objected to the Bishop Street extension from Broad Street to Johnson Avenue. Pete Evans, Ella Street, supported an EIR to review the proposed development and mitigate its problems. He felt the original-council decision to issue a negative declaration was wrong and -that if the city had listened to the people, they would have an EIR.by this time approved and the project would be on its way with.all problems.mitiagted. Joseph.Rathbaugh..supported an objective, independent, and unbiased EIR on geology.and- seismic problems.. He stated that there are very real problems with unstable soils, etc. Jerry.Emery, landscape.architect, urged the_council.to require an.EIR for the Terrace Hill project. He felt the state law was passed just for projects like this so that the full information could be brought to the public, this was the.reason for.the.California Environmental Quality Act. Mayor Cooper declared.the public hearing closed. Mayor.Cooper.called..a recess at 12:10 a.m. The City Council reconvened at 12:25 a.m., all- councilmembers present. On motion-of.-Councilman-Jorgensen, seconded-by-Councilwoman Billig, the City Council.deny_the appeal and uphold .the_Planning,Commissian_'s. requirement that a focused EIR -.be prepared. Motion carried on the following roll call vote: AYES:_ Councilmemhers_Jorgensen, Billig, Bondy Dunin.and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: None I� 1 1 City Council Minutes April 17, 1979 - 7:30 P.M. Page 12 The city staff was-directed-to bring.back a scope of work for the focused EIR for council considertion. 6. At.this time-the City Council_held_a public hearing to consider an amendment.to.the -South Street Specific Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission to-change-the designation of 0.8 acres near South Street from multifamily residential to private recreation. ' Henry Engen, Community Development Director, presented the recommendation of the Planning Commission which was to amend the specific plan to allow multi- family recreation on this property. Mayor Cooper declared.the public hearing open. Rob Strong,.consultant.for the developer, stated he was available for discussion with the City Council. Mayor Cooper declared.the public hearing closed. On motion of-Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilwoman Billig, -the following resolution was introduced: Resolution-No. 3826 (1979 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo amending the South Street Specific Plan. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen ers Dunin, Billig, Bond, Jorgensen-and Mayor Cooper NOES: None ABSENT: None 7. At this -time the City Council held_a public hearing to consider an amendment to the-text-of-the Zoning Regulations to allow fraternities and sororities, subject to use permit approval and certain conditions, within the medium- density residential zone. George Thar-her, City Attorney, reviewed he Memorandum Opinion No. 79 -21, dated April 4, 1979, dealing with the action of the City Council in adopting Resolution No. 3814, the R -2 district text amendment. Henry Engen,_Community Development Director, then.reviewed alternatives for the City Council in amending the-zoning ordinance to allow fraternities, sororities in the R -2 zone. He reviewed a legislative draft of the ordinance which amended the zoning regulations to include fraternal organizations and the definitions, to change the dwelling unit occupancy limit in the R -2 zone, and the conditions in_the zoning chart for R -2 which established the condi- tions for use by group quarters. .He also reviewed for the City-Council the proposed amendments suggested by the sorority representatives to allow R -2 uses by sororities and fraternities. The City Council reveived a communication.from Lauretta Rice.-president of the League of Women-Voters, urging the City Council to-give very.thorough reconsideration of their decision to allow sorority operations in the R -2 area on Higuera Street due to its wider implications on the entire community. Letters were.received from the following individuals supporting.the council's action in considering a.change in zoning to allow- fraternities and - sororities in the R -2 zone: Polly Simpson,.607 Grand Avenue Nancy Gerrish Kathy Golden Mrs. Joe S. Tucker, 3330 Ferndale Drive, Santa Maria The City-Council received a letter signed by ten-members Advisory Committee informing the City Council of of-the-Citizens their complete.disagreement with the preliminary action taken by the council that proposed -a basic change in the city's zoning ordinance to accommodate the wishes of one sorority. Letters were.received from the following individuals supporting.the council's action in considering a.change in zoning to allow- fraternities and - sororities in the R -2 zone: Polly Simpson,.607 Grand Avenue Nancy Gerrish Kathy Golden Mrs. Joe S. Tucker, 3330 Ferndale Drive, Santa Maria City Council Minutes April 17, 1979 - 7:30 P.M. Page 13 Julie Wheeler Bernadine Barrow,.2365 Sunset Drive Kathryn Evans Dr..Lorraine.Howard,..Associate Dean of.Women, Cal Poly Jean E. Ferrini,_633- Al -Hil Drive Gerry Johnson,_265.Westmont Connie Hendricks, 549 Jeffrey Drive Mayor..Cooper- declared the public - hearing open. , Dick Jacobs, University College Instructor_in planning, made a lengthy presentation.in- opposition to amending the zoning ordinance to allow sororities and fraternities in the R -.2 zones with a use permit. He urged the council to require the sororities to rezone properties to R -3 and be honest about-it rather than.attempt to come in the -back door. He urged the council to- change their minds and reject the proposal and not allow sororities or fraternities in -the R -2 zones. He wished to remind the council that any action they took at this time would affect all -the R -2 zones -and not just this one individual - property. Rosemary Talley, president of the House Committee.for the sorority, supported the staff's alternatives to allow sororities in the R -2 zones -with conditions regarding number of persons per acre, etc. Pat Kershaw,-president of the sorority, was- in.support of the zoning wording changes recommended and would pledge-to-live by.any.use permit conditions imposed by the city on-the sorority.. Charlene Lindquist, alumna coordinator, supported the sorority's application for a use permit and stated that she would support any use permit conditions established by the city. Penny Rappa,_Oldtown Neighborhood. Association.-was-opposed-to-any text amend- ' ment in.the-R-2 zone -to allow .so.rorities_and.fraternities _ in -that zone. Her main worry was that the R -2 zones were fit for families and should not be used for group living. Councilman - Jorgensen stated he was-.opposed-to-allowing-sororities-and fratern- ities in R -2 zones and to.amend the zoning.ordinance.to allow such uses in the R -2 zone. He felt that the sororities should consider R -3 zoning change, rather than try to break.the R -2 conditions. Councilman-Bond-stated he could.support amending -the zoning.text.to.allowing sororities and fraternities in-the R- 2.zone with a use permit.. He recommended that they should consider R -3 zone changes. Councilman Dunin stated that he would.support the zoning-change to allow sororities-and-fraternities-in-the R -2 zone_. He-felt-that this was -a good use of this particular property -and that it would never be used for family living and it should be allowed to be developed... Councilwoman - Billig stated.she could not support the.zone text amendment to allow sororities and fraternities-in-the R- 2.zones with a_use permit. She felt it would be bad for -all R -2 zones, not.just.this.particular zone which could be-an exception. Mayor.Cooper.stated that.he could . support..the -text change to-the zoning ordinance which. would. allow .fraternities.and.sororities in-the-R-2 zone with , a use permit. On motion -of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Mayor Cooper, the following ordinance . was.introduced - .an.ordinance.of.the City- of.San.Luis Obispo amending the zoning regulations_to. allow fraternal - organizations in.the R -2 ( medium - density - residential). zone subject to use permit approval and certain conditions. Motion lost on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dunin and Mayor Cooper NOES:. Councilmembers Billig, Bond and Jorgensen ABSENT: None City Council Minutes April 17, 1979 - 7:30 P.M. Page 14 On motion of-Councilman-Jorgensen, seconded by Councilman Bond, to recommend that the sorority apply for a General Plan amendment and zoning change for 1536 Higuera.Street_to R -3. Motion carried. on.the - following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmember .s.Jorgensen,_Bond,- Dunin and Mayor Cooper ' NOES: _Councilwoman Billig ABSENT: None 8. The City Council. considered- the.Tentative.Tract.Map -No. 798, The Village, a 90- unit..residential- condominium, 501 South-Street, R -4 -SP zone, Gann Investments,.subdivider. Henry Engen,_Community Development Director, presented the .recommendations of the City Planning-Commission which recommends that the-council adopt a resolution granting approval of the tentative tract map for Tract No. 798 subject to the seven findings and nineteen conditions established by the Planning Commission. Rob Strong, respresenting _the - property owner, stated that the property owner agreed with all conditions of the Planning Commission and was available to answer questions. On motion.of Councilman.Jorgensen, seconded by Councilman Bond, the following resolution-was introduced:. Resolution.No.. 3827 (1979 Series), a. resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo granting - approval.of Tentative Tract No. 798 located -at -501 South Street subject to findings.and conditions. Passed -and adopted on-the following.roll. call vote: ' AYES: Councilmembers_ Jorgensen,.Bond,.Dunin.and Mayor Cooper NOES:. Councilwoman-Billig ABSENT: None There being no further business-to come before the City - Council, Mayor Cooper adjourned the.council_meeting.at 1:30 a.m., April 18, 1979, to 12:10 p.m., Monday, April 23, 1979. Approved by the City-Council-on 6/5/79 J itzpatrick, City Clerk ------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- M I N U T E S ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MONDAY, APRIL 23, 1979 - 12:10 P.M. HEARING ROOM, CITY HALL 990 PALM STREET, SAN LUIS OBISPO IRoll Call COUNCILMEMBERS Present: Melanie Billig, Alan Bond, Ron Dunin, Jeff Jorgensen and Mayor Lynn R. Cooper Absent: None