Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/13/1983M I N U T E ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MONDAY, JUNE 13, 1983 - 12:10 P.M. COUNCIL HEARING ROOM, CITY HALL, 990 PALM STREET SAN. LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL Councilmembers Present: GlennaDeane Dovey, Ron Dunin, Robert Griffin, Allen K. Settle and Mayor Melanie C. Billig Absent: None City Staff Present: .Paul Lanspery, Administrative Officer; Geoff Grote, Assistant Administrative Officer; Pamela Voges, City.Clerk; Toby Ross, Community Development Director; Wayne Peterson, City Engineer; Bobbie Goddard, Acting Finance Director; Dave Romero, Public Works Director; Lane Wilson, Supervisor Building /Parks Maintenance; Dave Elliott, Administrative Assistant; Dave Pierce, Transit Manager; Nancy Knofler, Transit Coordinator;. Jack Whitehouse, Chairman of the. Business Improvement Area -----------------=------------------------------------------------------- CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT Wayne Peterson, City Engineer, reviewed the Construction Engineering Service Program of the Construction Development Budget, requested amount $304,870 (see pages D -28 & D -29 of the budget). He then reviewed the six major objectives, with a suggestion to add item 417, which would be.to prepare setback lines for the major creeks (9/83 - 5/85). The two objectives that he would like to report on'a quarterly basis were items 412 and..#4; to create a long -term maintenance schedule for city streets, and to review and design setback maps for major streets.. He stated that a policy statement for 415 would be ready by mid August /early September. This would be a very time consuming project. With regard to 414 which was to reduce the time taken to review private development projects, he hoped to improve the turnaround time with the possibility of offering applicants a manual incorporating current city and state policies and mandates. With regard to objective 412, he stated that an outside consultant would be required to review the city's long -term maintenance. They would then set up a procedure for the most efficient system and update street life expectancies. . Councilman Dunin was opposed to objective 412 if it required the use of.a consultant. He also felt that objective 414 kept coming back to the Council and he would like to see this item completed in this fiscal year. Mayor Billig stated that she was very supportive of objectives 412, 5 and 4, in that order. After brief discussion and upon general consensus, Council gave conceptual approval to the requested amount of $304,870 as amended. Toby Ross, Community Development Director, reviewed the Construction Regulations Service Program under Construction Development. The requested budget was $211,680 (found on pages D -30 & D -31 of the budget). He had listed two objectives and he suggested adding a third one to revise plan procedures to include recent state energy requirements (to be completed by 7/84). He would request item 411, which was to improve the rate of plan review be done on a quarterly basis. Mayor Billig agreed that objective 411 was extremely critical, the plan review was a very timely process, and has been a problem for some time. 1 1 n L City Council Minutes Monday, June 13, 1983 - 12:10 p.m. Page 2 In response to a question by Councilman through the entire review process only project. Minor projects are assigned t Dunin, Toby Ross stated that one project manager handles a major o whoever has the available time. After brief discussion and upon general consensus, Council gave its conceptual approval to the requested amount of $211,680 as amended (5 -0). ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Jack Whitehouse, Chairman of the Business Improvement Area, reviewed the Business Improvement Area Service Program under the Economic Development 11 Budget Program. The requested amount was $92,000. He reviewed the major service activities, divided this year's expenditures into four categories instead of three, which provides for 31% of all revenues to.be. allocated to the parking plan. 23% of the revenues are allocated to general promotional activities of an institutional nature such as continuing a successful downtown merchant /BIA cooperative ad campaign. 24% of revenues are to be allocated to beautification projects in the downtown area, and 22% of revenues to be allocated to administration which would include the adminis- trator's employment contract with the city. He stated.that contract was being reviewed now and would be coming back to the Council in the near future. BIA had three major objectives: 1) public education campaign regarding a parking structure; 2) promotion committee's efforts in six main activities; and 3) beautification committee for the downtown. There would be a $30,000. carry -over from last year's budget. Councilman Griffin questioned if a reserve policy had been established for the BIA. He felt that it might be appropriate that one start for special projects, equipment -or other expenditures::that. would be ongoing or would require more than one year to fund. Mayor Billig.suggested adding an objective #4 for the orientation of new members or new chairpersons. She also suggested a slight revision to objective #3 looking at the possibility of property owners in the downtown getting more involved and possibly buying some of the street furniture with regard to the beautification and at the same time being recognized in some fashion. After brief discussion and upon general consensus, Council gave conceptual approval.to the BIA budget with suggested amendments (5 -0). STREETS AND SIDEWALKS Dave Romero, Public Works Director, reviewed the Street and Sidewalk Maintenance Service Program under Streets and Sidewalks (see pages D -58 & D -59) requested budget amount $539,230. He stated that there were 10.10 permanent staffinembers, four service activities, and six major objectives. He would recommend that item #6, moving to the new corporation yard by February 1984, be reported on a quarterly basis. He also reviewed those items that were cut out of this budget. After brief discussion, the Council suggested amending objective #1 to read, "evaluate the pros and cons of using a root pruner to control tree root damage to sidewalks (7/83 - 10/83). Request a budget increase if equipment purchase and staff are warranted ". Upon general consensus, Council gave conceptual approval to the requested budget amount as amended (5 -0). Council.also.gave.conceptual approval to the.Sidewalk Installation and Maintenance Budget Policy Statement found on page.B -12 & B -13 of the budget with an amendment to #1 Reimbursable sidewalk construction and repair to read "under certain circumstances where a property owner is responsible for installing or repairing sidewalk improvements, the city contracts for the work necessary and then collects payment from the owner." fMHW i 0 ii JW l Ui if 6% fjf4t4�f. On new construction, the city may finance owner payments in althree year lien at an interest established.bv the Citv Council and reviewed every three years (5 -0). City Council Minutes Monday, June 13, 1983 - 12:10 p.m. Page 3 Councilman Dunin also requested that the sidewalk policy be brought back to the Council for review (5 -0). 1:30 p.m., Councilman Griffin left the meeting. Dave Romero, Public Works Director, then reviewed pages D -60 and D -61`of the budget concerning Street Signs & Painting, requested budget amount of $102,740. He stated that there were 2.20 permanent staffinembers, and two objectives; 1) to shift most street markings from paint to thermoplastic in order to reduce long -term maintenance costs, and 2) evaluate the feasibility of using thermoplastic for fairly permanent curb markings, such as those adjacent to fire hydrants. Council discussed the confusion of some striping /markings on center two -way turn lanes. Dave Romero, Public Works Director, stated he felt it was a state require- ment, but he would look into it and report back to the Council. However, if it was a state requirement and the City did not mark in accordance with their guidelines, the City would be liable in the event an accident or other mishap should occur. After brief discussion, Council concurred that it was only necessary to leave the international sign taking the other worded signs down where possible. The emphasis not being on directional signs but rather other informational ones. After discussion, it was suggested that Mr. Romero report back on the proliferation of signing, and to add objective #3 to consolidate all street signs (4 -0). Dave Romero, Public Works Director, then reviewed the Street Signals and Lighting Service Program (found on pages b -62 & D -63 of the budget). He stated that the permanent staffing consisted of .45 persons. -There were two major service activities', and two major objectives. He reviewed those items deleted from this budget, including a request for one full -time maintenance person that he felt was important to cut down on the liability and the problems of maintaining street signals in proper working order. Councilman Dunin felt that when a safety problem existed that such a request for additional personnel be looked at closely. Council was also concerned that the city at some point be able to purchase the street lighting from P. G. & E. or at least have staff explore those alternatives. After brief discussion and upon general consensus, Council requested that a third objective be added that would direct staff to prepare reports for street lighting and traffic signals which compare the costs of liability and long -term repair at different levels of maintenance (1/84 - 2/85) (4 -0 -1). Dave Romero, Public Works Director, then reviewed the Storm Drain and Waterway Maintenance Service Program under Streets and Sidewalks (found on pages D -64 & D -65 of the budget). He stated there were 2.80''permanent staffinembers, total budget of $109,670. He had four major service acti- vities and two major objectives. Both objectives would be reported on a quarterly basis. He also reviewed the Storm Drainage Budget Policy (found on page B -11 of the budget). He stated that the additional position he had requested to handle the additional responsibilities inherent in taking over Zone 9 maintenance had been denied even though funds would be made available from Zone 9. 'Without the additional position, the department would be hard pressed to meet all objectives without severly hampering other programs. Council then reviewed the Storm Drainage Policy Statement (found on page B -11 of the budget) and gave conceptual approval with an amendment to the policy statement #1 to read "The city will "JJ%Jli OJO fW10i establish a long -term agreement to accept responsibility for the maintenance of Zone 9 creeks within the city limits and to receive payment for this work from Zone 9." 11 J 1