HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/01/1983City Council Minutes
Tuesday, November 1,
Page 2
C -1 COUNCIL MINUTES
1983 - 7:00 p.m. -
C O N -S E NT CA L E N D A R
On motion of Councilwoman Dovey, seconded by Councilman Settle, the following
minutes were approved as amended: Tuesday, July -5, 1983 - 7:00 p.m.;
Tuesday, September 6, 1983 - 7:00 p.m.; Transcript of Tuesday, September
20, 1983'-.'7:12 p.m. (item #1)'. Motion carried, all ayes.
C -2 CONTRACT PAY ESTIMATES
On motion of Councilwoman Dovey, seconded by Councilman Settle, contract
pay estimates and change orders were approved and ordered paid as amended.
Motion carried, all ayes.
C -3 REPORT ON BIDS - CONTRACT TO FURNISH TRANSIT COACHES
Council reviewed report on bids received for "CONTRACT TO FURNISH TRANSIT
COACHES "; bid estimate $428,900, without contingencies; bids opened Friday,
October 21, 1983.
On motion of Councilwoman Dovey, seconded by Councilman Settle, the following
resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 5241 (1983 Series), a• resolution
of-the Council of the City of San,Luis Obispo awarding bid to Bus Industries
of America, Inc., in the amount of $406,187.
Passed and adopted on the - -following roll call _ yq.te: -_ .: •.
AYES: 'Councilm'embers Dovey; Settle, Dunin, Griffin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
I..
ABSENT: None
C -4 APPOINTMENTS TO THE JOINT RECREATIONAL USE OF SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY
COMMITTEE
On motion of Councilwoman Dovey, seconded by Councilman Settle, that the
recommendation by staff for appointments to the Joint Recreational Use of
School District Property Committee be accepted subject to the Board of
Education's confirmation. Staff further directed to update the committee
bylaws to conform to the Advisory Body Handbook guidelines. Appointments
as follows:
1. Donald King - reappointed, term to expire 3/31/85
2. Steve Gale - reappointed, term to expire 3/31/86
3. Sharon Gripp - reappointed, term to expire 3/31/85
4. Mike Smithers - appointed;"term to expire 3/31/86
5. John Bria - appointed, term to expire 3 /31/86
6. Dan Fulmer - appointed, term to expire 3/31/86
Motion carried, all ayes.
C -5 CAC WORK PROGRAM
Council considered the Annual Work Program for the Citizen's Advisory
Committee which was going to consist of involvement in the Strategic
Planning Program, an on -going project on a public information program, and
Fire Master Planning.
U
Mayor Billig stated that when it comes to public information and public '
relations, she would like to see the committee reviews take an overall
approach and not just a revision of the newsletter. She would like to see
a much more open ended approach to how the city can better conduct its
community relations.
Council concurred (5 -0)'.
C -6 SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT TIME EXTENSION'
Council considered a resolution extending the subdivision agreement for
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, November 1, 1983 - 7:00 p.m.
Page 3
Tract 781 (Exposition Park, Phase III) to provide for a 12 -month time
extension; Gann Investments, subdivider.
Dave Romero, Public Works Director, stated that the Fish and Game Department
may not allow the developer to have this portion of the project completed
by January 1, 1984, but did not feel that would cause any real problem as
long as - they -were well underway by June 1, 1984.,
After brief discussion, it was moved by Councilwoman Dovey, seconded by
i� Councilman Settle, the following resolution be introduced: Resolution No.
5242 (1983 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo extending the subdivision agreement as amended.
1
1
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Settle, Dunin, Griffin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
P U B L I C H E A R I N G S
1. FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCE NO. 994 - SOUTH STREET (R1112)
Council held a public hearing to consider final passage of Ordinance No.
994, an ordinance rezoning property located at 265, 271, 277 and 285 South
Street from (M)- Manufacturing to (C -S) Service Commercial; Midland Pacific
Building Corp., applicant (continued.from 9/20/83.and 10/18/83):
Toby Ross, Community Development Director, briefly reviewed the council
agenda report (see file no. 463) stating that the Council had passed to
print the ordinance to implement the proposed rezoning at its meeting of
October 18;.1983.--The site consisted of 4'lots. totaling approximately 3.7
acres, presently undeveloped, although the city had granted ARC and tentative
map approval for:an industrial condominium project on.ithe site: Nearby
uses included single and multiple dwellings, a print shop, auto repair and
a construction material supplier. He recommended final passage.of the
ordinance as recommended.
Mayor Billig stepped down.
Vice -Mayor Dunin presiding.
Vice -Mayor Dunin opened the public hearing.
No one spoke for or against the proposed passage of the ordinance.
Vice -Mayor Dunin closed the hearing.
After brief discussion it was moved by Councilman Settle, seconded by
Councilman Griffin, to give final passage to Ordinance No. 994 (1983
Series) as submitted.
Finally passed on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey and Vice -Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Billig
Mayor Billig returned to•the Council meeting:
2. FINAL MAP1APPROVAL FOR--TRACT 929 -:UNIT I
Council held a public hearing to consider a resolution granting final map
approval for Tract 929, Unit I, creating 24 residential lots and one
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, November 1, 1983 - 7:00 p.m.
Page 4
open -space lot (portion of Phase I) of.the Edna -Islay Specific Plan located
at 4000 Broad Street; R -1 -SP zone; Santa Lucia Hills, Inc.-, subdivider.
Dave Romero, Public Works Director, briefly reviewed the council agenda
report (see file no. 410 -929) stating that this was the first unit of Tract
929 and"Phase I of the Edna -Islay Specific-Plan, consisting of 7 units
All conditions had been "met and /or bonded for. Staff was recommending
Council adoption of the resolution conditionally approving the final map
and authorizing the Mayor to.execute the subdivision agreement.
Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open.
Charles French, subdivider, stated he was available if the Council had any
questions.
Mayor'Billig declared the public hearing closed. '
Mayor Billig questioned the legality of not having the fees.in hand prior
to giving final approval of the map.
Roger Picquet, City Attorney, stated that the law was fairly clear on this
issue, in that all fees should be in receipt prior to granting of the
approval as the law does not provide for conditional approval. In this
particular case, he would assume that there was minimal risk as this was
only the first phase and the Council was in a position to come back on the
developer.in the event the fees were not submitted:..
Dave Romero; Public. Works Director, stated that.the procedure that staff
followed this time was the practice previously followed, however, the-new
City Attorney has changed the procedure. In the future, staff would see to
it that all fees were collected in advance.
Councilman Griffin questioned if there would.be any problem if this project
was held up for an additional,2 weeks until those fees had been submitted.
Charles French, subdivider „ stated that in this particular case the fees
were extremely high, to the tune of $120,000, and the contractor would be
unable to be paid until the final map was given approval by the City. He
felt there was plenty of opportunity for the City to collect and did not
feel this was a high risk situation for the City.
Councilmembers Settle and Dunin stated they had no problem with approving
the map as recommended. I .
On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the following
resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 5243 (1983 Series), a resolution
of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo granting final map approval
for Tract 929, Unit I, as recommended.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle;-Dunin, Dovey, Griffin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Upon general consensus, staff directed to have fees in hand prior to final
map approval.
3. FINAL MAP APPROVAL FOR TRACT 1125
Council held a public hearing to consider.a resolution to grant final map
approval for Tract 1125 creating a five -unit industrial air -space condominium
conversion located at 855 Via Esteban; M zone; Mark Wheeler, subdivider.
Mayor Billig declared-the public hearing open.
No one spoke for or against the proposed map.
7
LJ
1
1
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, November 1, 1983 - 7:00 p.m.
Page 5
Mayor Billig declared the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilwoman Dovey, seconded by Councilman Griffin,'the
following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 5244 (1983 Series), a
resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo granting final map
approval for Tract 1125 as recommended.
Passed'and adopted on the following roll call-vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Griffin; Dunin, Settle and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
4:. FINAL PASSAGE OF GENERAL PLAN ORDINANCES
Council held a public hearing to consider final passage of General Plan
ordinances to amend the official zone map of the city as shown below:
A. BROAD /SANTA BARBARA STREETS . - .0988 -- change designation from Neighborhood -
Commercial (C -N) to Service - Commercial /Light Industrial (C -S) on
property..located at 2110.Broad.Street and 2121 Santa Barbara Street;
Jules Rogoff, applicant (continued from 8/9/83 and 10/11/83).
B. HATHWAY AVENUE - 0989 =- change designation from Low- Density Residential
(R -1) to Medium - Density Residential .(R -2) on property located at 291,
301, 321 and 331.Hathway Avenue; Jessie.Norris and City of San Luis
Obispo applicants (continued from 8/9/83 and 10/11/83).
C. ALICITA COURT - 0990 -- change designation from Medium - Density Residential
(R -2 and R -2 -S) to Medium /High- Density Residential (R -3) on property
located at 3120 through 3195 Alicita Court; John Wiebe;•applicant
(continued from 8/9/83 and 10/11/83).
' D. MARGARITA AVENUE - 0991 -- change designation from Medium - Density
Residential (R -2 and R -2 -S) to Medium /High - Density Residential (R -3)
%-on property located at 206.and:210 Margarita,,Avenue; City of San Luis
Obispo, applicant (continued from 8/9/83 and-10 /11/83).
E: -CASA STREET - 0992--change-designation from Office (0) to High- Density
Residential (R -4) on property located at 60 Casa Street; William and
Beatrice Jeong; applicants (continued from 10/11/83).
F. LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD - AUTO PARK WAY - 0993 -- change designation from
Service- Commercial /Light Industrial- Planned Development.(C -S -PD) to
:-,:-Service Commercial special:considerations (C -S -S) on property located
at 12300 Los Osos Valley Road; Jay Stream, applicant (continued from
8/9/83 and 10/11/83).
Toby Ross, Community Development-Director, briefly reviewed each of the six
General Plan properties, stating that the Council could approve, deny or
continue any individual item. Council had previously held hearings and
could take additional testimony:: Staff was recommending.final passage of
thetordinances. 1:
Mayor Billig declared the public hearing .open to discuss any or all items.
No one spoke for or against any of the ordinances.
' Mayor. Billig declared the:pub,lic hearing.closed.
On motion of Councilman Settle; seconded by Councilwoman Dovey', to give
final passage to ordinance nos. 988 through 993 as recommended, which were
'introduced:October 11, 1983.
Finally passed on the following roll call vote:
AYES: - Councilmembers Settle, Dovey, Dunin, Griffin and Mayor'Billig
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, November 1,
Page 6
NOES: None
1983 - 7:00 p.m. ..-
ABSENT: None
5. STONERIDGE ONE PROJECT - TRACT 1150 -(PD 1126)
Council held a public hearing to consider a Planning Commission recommenda-
tion to approve a preliminary development plan for planned development
project and tentative map for Tract 1150 (Stoneridge One) to create a
43 -lot residential subdivision with 42 lots`'for houses and one lot for '
future multi - family residential use located at 2877 Broad Street; R -1 -PD;
John Ring, applicant (continued from 9/6/83).
Toby Ross, Community Development Director, reviewed the council agenda
report (file no. 410 -1105) stating that the Council had determined that the
tentative map and planned development approvals -.had expired at '.its meeting
of September 16. The developer had resubmitted its application and plans
for a similar residential project• on the same••site: ' The, Planning- -Commission
held its public hearing on October 12 and, on a 3- 2.vote, recommended -
Council approval subject to the findings and conditions noted in.the
resolution.. A• similar project involving the tentative map.for Tract 935
was originally :approved by the.CounUl in conjunction with preliminary plan
approval for planned development rezoning of the property on November 18,
1980. July 27, 1982, the council granted a 12 -month time extension for
filing both the precise development plan.and the final tract map. On
September 6, 1983, the Council determined that all previous project approvals
for planned development in the tract had expired. The Architectural Review
Commission continued its previous project on September 15, 1980, no ARC
approvals had been granted. Staff was recommending Council take two
actions to approve the project as requested;-to approve the preliminary
plan including a 25% density bonus with appropriate findings, and approve
the tentative map and subdivision exceptions as'outlined with Condition No.
20 modified to include the requirement that a homeowner's association be
created to enforce the tract CC &R's.
Councilman Dunin noted that-Condition No. 3 referenced a 1.5 acre park. He 1
was concerned as to whether this was going to be held as open space or was
actually to be a public park.
Toby Ross, Community Development Director; stated that-it was a public park
as required and previously discussed by the Council. It.is smaller than
the standard for a neighborhood park In order-to be a standard -sized park
it would need a minimum of 2.5 acres.
Councilman Settle was concerned as to'�whether the.city,wou•ld have the
ultimate responsibility for keeping this park up or would the homeowner's
association.
Mayor.Billig again clarified that years ago it was determined that Sinsheimer
Park was too far away to be the neighborhood park for the Rockview /Lawrence
Drive area and that the development must_provide.for these amenities.,
Roger Picquet, City Attorney, stated that as this was a'public park, it
really should not be the responsibility of the homeowner's association.
Dave Romero; Public Works Director, stated that due to the steepness of
most of the park, it would probably remain primarily open space.
Councilman Griffin suggested strengthening the language on Condition No. '
20 -C concerning the responsibility of the homeowner's association:
Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open.
T. Keith Gurnee, with Richmond Rossi and Montgomery and representing the
applicant, reviewed a letter they had submitted to the Council, regarding
their concerns:
Condition No. '4, Minimum street yard 'setbacks required: He stated.that a
10 foot street yard setback had been a critical ingredient of the planning
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, November 1, 1983 - 7:00 p.m.
Page 7
program and approved previously. In the processing of the submittal, staff
and the commission had set a 15 foot setback based on staff's recommendation
that the lesser setback would be'too imposing: In requesting that the
Council abide by their original 10 foot setback condition, he offered the
following arguments: 1) A 15 foot-setback would require that the units
along lots 2 -16 be located closer to the lots fronting along Lawrence
Drive. In the previous project, many neighbors along Lawrence Drive
supported.the 10 foot setback to get .the units further away from their
lots. 2).The garages.would be situated at the.setback line, would be
' oriented-for side loading and would not face:.the street... 3) A.10 foot
setback.would give the development more intimacy from the street;•not
inconsistent with the streetscapes of other residential sections in San
Luis Obispo; and 4) because minimal grading was proposed as part of the
:.subdivision,:-some of. the, steeper individual, lots • (13-16, 17-20) would
require more grading when they were .developed if a 15 foot setback was
required..
2) Condition No. 9: referencing the-requirements, subsequent submittal to
and approval by the ARC for any'development on those lots. He felt that it
should be deleted as an unnecessary item for the following reasons: 1) Lot
1, the closest to Broad Street, which would be developed with 3 apartments
.or condominium units sometime in the future; would be required to go
through the ARC anyway. 2) Just because lots 25 -29, and 40 -43 were not
typical rectangular lots would not make them sensitive sites, a term that
had been historically applied to lots with creeks, sensitive environmental
conditions, extreme topographic difficulty, etc. 3) The ARC package
proposed that units already designed or new designs of similar scale,
materials, design vernacular, colors, etc., would be placed on these sites.
Based on this, it should not be necessary to go through the ARC for•each
design on each of these lots. 4) A condition requiring one quarter of the
lots to go through the ARC process was.unnecessarily burdensome, especially
when the-design on these lots would have to follow specific design.criteria
set forth in the,CC &R's.. It,would also create an additional work load on
the staff and ARC that could barely handle the existing work load. One
' additional item was the issue of drainage, particularly along the lots
,facing Lawrence Drive. He stated that the culvert-there was only-an.,
expensive and arguable concession to the neighbors. Since most stormwater
-on the property would.be captured by storm drains and conveyed along.
•Stoneridge- Drive, the developments of lots 1 -16, without the culvert; would
still be much better for the neighborhood than the present situation.
... .:i .. . . i, :,.. .. . . - .
Dave Romero, Public•Works Director; questioned-if the applicant could
guarantee paved access to the standard manholes so that the pipes could be
cleaned out by staff.
Council-and applicant discussed possible alternatives to an easement and
access by the city for the maintenance of the back of those lots.
Roy Hanff, 569 Lawrence Drive, stated he was still opposed to approval of
the project for several reasons: 1) The storm drain or culvert on the
property; 2) the 10 -foot easement; 3) 30 -foot setback on the north side of
the development;•4) new permit required from Cal Trans for dumping the
.rainwater into Broad.Street:,main storm drain;.5) realistic water figures
and calculation of rainwater that was going to be diverted into the main
storm drain including lot nos. 14, 15 and 16; 6) price of the lot was
misleading; 7) 20 =year bond taken out by the developer-,should be written
into the project to assure-cleaning of the 'storm drain every year; 8) a
full EIR report should be required as testified by.156.neighbors' signatures;
and--9) leveling and grading -of all lots should be.a responsibility-.of the
developer-and written into the,project.as a condition.
Tom Schumann, 630 Perkins Lane and whose residence was located opposite of
Lawrence Drive-,agreed that' there:. should be an agreement' ,Whereby the
developer would.-bond or take the financial responsibility in some way for
20 years for any possible flooding or.drainage problems inherent with this
project.
John Ring, +,developer, stated:that.the-7original goal.for•this.project was
affordable housing.- These additional-conditions would not provide for
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, November 1, 1983 - 7:00 p.m.
Page 8
that., With regard to the setback line, he. stated that five architects had
reviewed the-project and.did,not feel the 15 -foot setback was required and
would urge the Council to leave this issue alone. With regard to drainage,
he felt the drainage improvements being put in for this project would
enhance the entire area making it much better for both those people living
in the project as well as the owners located on Lawrence-Drive.-
Upon question by Councilman Settle as to whether or not he would be.willing
to bond the drainage for 20 years, Mr. King was unaware of what the ramifica-
tions might be -and felt - that'the situation really did not warrant the bond '
because of the - amount of- improvements that were being provided.
With regard -to•who should be the responsible party, Toby Ross, Community
Development Director, stated that the flood plan recently adopted by the
council requires the property owner to be the responsible party.
Roger Picquet, City Attorney, stated that with regard to the bonding issue,
it may not be feasible to require the developer to bond for such an item.
Councilman.Dunin was.also concerned with the drainage issue; stating that
the property•owner should have recognized that when the land was purchased
it would be a difficult site to develop.
Tom Schuman questioned if.the developer would sign another agreement to
accept the iesp6hsibility or whether- he-would be willing to pay'foi some
type of flood insurance.
Mayor Billig.declared the public hearing closed.
Dave Romero, Public Works Director, suggested adding to Condition No. 11 to
read "A 10 -foot drainage easement shall be granted to the city over said
drains and at periodic access intervals, to be- located and moved-at the
mutual.agreement -of the developer and the city ". '
Councilwoman Dovey did not have a problem with the variable 15 -foot setbacks.
Councilman Settle stated that some access to assure protection from flooding
should be required. He would be willing to live with 10 -foot setbacks.
Councilman Dunin had no problem with the variable setbacks between 10 and
15 feet. The drainage issue, though, must be addressed.
Councilman Griffin stated he could support the resolution.
Mayor Billig suggested amendment to Condition No. 6 to read "House models
A -F may be used along north property-line if landscape features are incorpo-
rated to mitigate potential privacy conflicts."
Councilman Settle agreed:
Mayor Billig stated.she, agreed with the setbackstas set by staff, keeping
in mind that this situation•is'rather unique. She would-look at the.height
and privacy factors. She could agree with 10 -foot setbacks in the front
yards. She would like the language strengthened with-regard to front yard
landscaping. Regarding drainage, she would support the current CC &R`s if
staff could not come up with anything better. With regard to the 25%
density bonus, she did not feel the developer had really done anything
special. It appeared that the bonus was given almost automatically. She ,
would have preferred to have seen more emphasis on solar or some innovative
architectural or open space prior to granting it.
Council also discussed the pros and cons of the small park and whether a
mini or neighborhood park should be allowed in this kind of.a development
or if in -lieu fees would have been better and those monies gone towards
improving a larger size park.
After discussion, it was moved by Councilwoman Dovey, seconded by Councilman
Settle, to continue this item for staff to incorporate the revisions as
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, November 1, 1983 - 7:00 p.m.
Page 9
discussed.this evening, with the intent to. bring it back at the November
15, 1983, council meeting for Council review.
Motion carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Settle, Dunin and Mayor Billig
NOES: Councilman Griffin
ABSENT: None
' - 1 WILLOWBROOK
6. TENTATIVE MAP APPROVAL 1 05 ( )
i
Council held a public hearing to•cotisider a Planning Commission recommendation
to grant tentative map approval for Tract 1105 (Willowbrook) creating a
28 -unit residential air - space "condominium located at.3990 and 4025 Poinsettia
Street; R -2 -SP• zone; Cuesta .Valley Properties, "subdivider.
Toby Ross, Community Development Director., reviewed the council agenda
report (file no. 410 -1105) and recommended that Council approve the tentative
map subject to the findings and conditions as listed in the resolution.
Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open.
Charles French,-representing-the applicant,'stated he was available for any
questions the Council might have.
Mayor Billig declared the public hearing closed.
Mayor Billig suggested an amendment to Condition No. 12 with regard,to the
noise attenuation wall that it be landscaped on both sides.
Council concurred.
After discussion, it was moved by Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman
Griffin, the following resolution be introduced: Resolution No., 5245 (1983
Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San'Luis Obispo granting
tentative map approval as amended.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey, Dunin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT:. None
C 0 M M U N I C A'T I 0 N S-
A:--Council-agreed-to-host League of California Cities Meeting in May or
June, 1984 in the City of San Luis Obispo as requested by Councilman
Settle (5 -0).
B. Mayor Billig stated that the Administrative Officer, Attorney and
herself have been reviewing the concerns various public members had
with regard to the expansion of the California Mens' Colony East
Facility and would welcome any Council comments to that effect.
9:10 p.m., Councilman Griffin left the meeting.
City Council agreed to adjourn this meeting to Thursday, November 3, 1983,
at 12:00 noon for a field trip to the Castle residence where a proposed bed
and breakfast request will be coming before the Council next week.
Councilman Griffin returned to the meeting.
9:20 p.m., Mayor Billig adjourned the meeting to Closed Session to discuss
Litigation Matters.
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, November 1, 1983 - 7:00 p.m.
Page 10
11:00 p.m. City Council reconvened in Open Session. There being no further
business to come before the City Council, Mayor Billig adjourned the
meeting to Thursday, November 3, 1983, at 12:W\noon.
5
s, City
APPROVED BY COUNCIL: 12/13/83
-------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
M I N U T E S
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1983 - 12:00 NOON
COUNCIL HEARING ROOM, CITY HALL, 990 PALM STREET
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers
Present: GlennaDeane Dovey, Ron Dunin, Allen K. Settle and Mayor
Melanie C. Billig
Absent: Robert Griffin
City Staff
Present: Toby Ross, Community Development Director
------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- 1
12:15 p.m. City Council adjourned to field trip to the Castle residence
at 1826 Chorro Street regarding an appeal on a bed and breakfast proposal.
3:00 p.m. City Council returned to City Hall, Councilman Griffin absent.
There being no further business to come before the City Council, Mayor
Billig adjourned the meeting at 3:00 p.m. to es ay, November 15, 1983
at 7:00 p.m. L .
Pamela Voges, Ci y Clerk
APPROVED BY COUNCIL: 12/13/83
M I N U T E S
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1983 - 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 990 PALM STREET
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE '
unT.T. r.AT.T.
Councilmembers
Present: GlennaDeane Dovey, Ron Dunin, Robert Griffin, Allen K.
Settle and Mayor Melanie C. Billig
Absent: None