HomeMy WebLinkAbout1217r
ORDINANCE NO. 1217 (1992 Series)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONE MAP
TO PREZONE APPROXIMATELY 10.4 ACRES R -1 -PD
AND 49.6 ACRES C /OS -40 AND ADOPT A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLPN
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 500 STONERIDGE DRIVE (GP /R 1346)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and the. City Council have
held hearings to consider appropriate zoning for the proposed
annexation area in accordance with Section 65800 et. seq. of the
California Government Code; and
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
SECTION 1. Zoning Map Designation. That the annexation area
be prezoned 11R -1 -PD" and 11C /OS -40" as shown on the map attached
marked Exhibit "C" and included herein by reference. This
prezoning becomes effective upon the date of final action by the
City Council on the annexation.
SECTION 2. Environmental Determination. The City Council
has determined that the project's Environmental Impact Report
adequately addresses the potential siqnificant environmental
impacts of the proposed annexation and pre- zoning, and incorporates
the mitigation measures shown on the attached Exhibit "A" into the
project.
SECTION 3. Adoption. The preliminary development plan,
adopted consistent with the R -1 -PD prezoning of the 10.4 acres
below the Development Limit Line, is approved, including the design
guidelines approved by the Architectural Review Commission, subject
to the following findings and conditions:
0 -1217
Ordinance No. 1217 (1992 Series)
Page 2
Findings
1. The proposed prezoning and preliminary development plan
will not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare
of persons living or working in the area or at the site.
2. The proposed prezoning and preliminary development plan
are consistent with the general plan.
3. The proposed project is appropriate at the proposed
location and will be compatible with surrounding land
uses.
4.`` Features of the proposed prezoning and preliminary
development plan design achieve the intent of
conventional standards for privacy, parking and
neighborhood compatibility as well or better than the
standards themselves.
5. The proposed project incorporates features which result
in consumption of less water than conventional
development because of plans to utilize on -site water for
irrigation of Rockview Park and possibly other purposes.
6. The proposed project provides exceptional public benefits
by providing 50 acres of open space to the City in fee
that would not be necessarily feasible without the
proposed development to unconventional development
standards.
7. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified by the
City Council on April 28, 1992, by Resolution No. 8005
(1992 Series), which describes significant environmental
impacts associated with project development. The EIR
concludes that the project will not have a significant
adverse impact on the environment subject to the
mitigation measures shown on the attached Exhibit A being
incorporated into the project. In conjunction with these
mitigation measures, changes or alterations have been
required in, or incorporated into, the project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant
environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR.
Conditions.
1. The applicant shall file a precise development plan for
city approval within six months of preliminary plan
approval. The Preliminary Development Plan approval shall
expire if a precise development plan is not filed and
approved.
Ordinance No. 1217 (1992 Series)
Page 3
2. A tentative subdivision map shall be submitted, reviewed
and approved prior to final development plan
consideration. If in the course of the tentative
subdivision map review, issues arise that significantly
alter the layout of streets, lots or other project
features, then a new preliminary development plan will
need to be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Commission and City Council. However, changes to the
configuration of lots to accommodate elimination of a
.single unit to conform with R -1 density standards could
be approved by the Community Development Director without
the submittal of a new preliminary development plan.
3. Project shall be built, maintained and operated in strict
conformance with approved.precise development plans.
4. The applicant shall obtain final approval of the
Architectural Review Commission of the project design
guidelines, condominium project plans, a continuous open
fence along the 325 contour line for Lots 17 to 33,
subdivision retaining walls and drainage swales and
Stoneridge Drive median development details.
5. Development of Lots 1 -17 shall conform with approved
building envelopes, as shown on the Exhibit Boards,
labeled 1 through 8, presented at the June 10, 1992,
Planning Commission hearing, and maintained in the
Community Development Department. These lots as well as
hillside lots, Lots 18 -33 shall require review and
approval by the Community Development Director. The
purpose of the review is to ensure consistency with
adopted design guidelines and all applicable project
conditions of approval.
6. The applicant shall dedicate to the City additional
property upslope of Rockview Park with the proposed
boundary changes to the park. The additional dedication
of park land to the City and changes to property lines
shall be reflected on the tentative subdivision map
submitted for the project.
7. The applicant shall submit a wetland mitigation plan with
the tentative subdivision map for the review and approval
of the City and the Department of Fish and Game.
8. Pedestrian paths to the hillside open space area above
the project and /or surrounding residential neighborhoods
shall be approved with the tentative subdivision map.
Ordinance No. 1217 (1992 Series)
Page 4
SECTION 4. Implementation. A summary of this ordinance,
together with the ayes and noes, shall be published, at least five
(5 ) days prior to its final passage, in the Telegram Tribune, a
newspaper published and circulated in said city, and the same shall
go into effect upon the date of final action by the City Council
on the annexation.
INTRODUCED AND PASSED TO PRINT by the Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo, at its meeting held on the 21st day of
July , 1992, on motion 'of Councilwoman Rappa ,
seconded by Councilman Reiss and on the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: Councilman Roalman
ABSENT: Councilwoman Pinard
�Vyo' un n.
ATTEST:
L 0,,., X,
City Jerk Pam V 0 es
APPROVED:
Ordinance No. 1217 (1992 Series)
Page 5
APPROVED:.
k
G,ftyTAdm'i—ni9`trat/ve Off'cer
1
Commun'ty Development Director
PREZONING MAC
GP/R1346
EXHIBIT C
s
C/bS 40 -SP c%
CORFtrA DR.
El C -LL
m
y - _ R -2
< R- *.
,7 � u u u � u � u
LA.Rjl U IVE
R-2-S
R-2-PQ
-S-
s _ ! CIOS -40 R_
J N
t <
LUPtTA
i
J J
iNgI�IIN�I�II
ros-
O-S-40
S-PD
S-S
i
R -2 -Pp
1
M
r
I J
R-2
Iu
1
PREZONING MAC
GP/R1346
EXHIBIT C
s
C/bS 40 -SP c%
CORFtrA DR.
El C -LL
m
y - _ R -2
< R- *.
,7 � u u u � u � u
LA.Rjl U IVE
R-2-S
R-2-PQ
-S-
s _ ! CIOS -40 R_
J N
t <
LUPtTA
i
J J
iNgI�IIN�I�II
Vl
a
V)
w
0
Q
L
FBI
z
� U
c
F a
H
W
z
H
z
W
Q
fq
U
so too
U
Gp ate+ C .�. ^' ° 9b
O � C) 'Cb }s� ca, Cd
CIO "0 y 0yCv'do U o �+ > 0'
>o U s o�U
cz
c ° = a
A �a�ia. c� 0"A0Ncn
4) ol Z7 O oO y bjD Q , «O U a cz
c . 'u45
o
c ed
Q �yUAo
L-g ° o��a�v^O0 a-Ld�;; � � te
> •� • .
� y N �%. 0 0
i .s`4 -x u °:
30 oo�cz>,oa�
Q U ^.
.r H
O O
�,,, •U r-r 'fl
cz cz O C4 cam rOi ..^`. cz h
.y •�
cc
wrA
z U -0 0 CQ cz V D U U
w .0 - -I ... -6 t -0 O bz
Ew h U• 0 ° v� c� O Q C
cz .r C
4r
cz
Cd
ti cz
p� C ^'r t1. � •'�
b O y b •C Cp _
O U
C . U >
" U tw •p .� 0 .0 C~q p
>`�3gi b.=3>
y � -
H
bb
it q � w
L"i I�r a y
o p
zc3 >¢
1 -3
a
O
0
U
ti
�I
GS
f'
Cif
L
►ter
Z
Q
F
U
J
F
L
z
H
Gz]
Q
6
a cc
h i C C L'y
CC cv
U U U U
9b 9b
c ^ U N U U L c r -0 w" CAW a U L �+ V
E cz .0 U O N cC
O cz
•� � :; .• a .-. cn
C b N .b
o UCZt t:U vW•o aG.3 c� =Cn'.�U>> cz E
Q ° CA U p £. O CA O C N -a a '�' O O CCA �. � • � QU '�
OO E -O CA U � .O. c3 Y Oa .}7 U cz
v a cC 0.0 i. O '� � '� •� c�: C p a 'b W O C� U
� _ Ir .r U C�., •.. U
C O O -p ct
° h O O 0 O
, , cz
171 Cq p •., s , �.
C U C O sr. _� -p c3 L ;A .— O
= C N 3U. cy3 C N C j p V N
O ' C4 U h C4 h >, cz
C'0 c4 •}^• ^� ��•► . a +-+ y '7 C "'' Q yW.y > N i 0
U O rJ O ^� CC / U r J r✓ U N °
U .� U 4i v7 rG ecs o. cC C �.fl C iV.. U Lz, G.M Ln Z sv.
O
o
s
u. O u
ey C C O O O p
v U U y U
cc
cz U
F Y v p p
C CZ C y
T1 -r O N
a> .�, cz a
0 cz c. o -o > -b N W v `� � b '� ti 0 3 c y CAS c
U cz N ^
p v C
co CZ c3 C U U .O ' U .ter ..U. Q �� i OU cz
0 cz -p 3 N° s�. v p p
cz a c
cz 0
> sue.. .Cp. U ~ • ty U cd y Q. � '� tom. `C �}" iZ, Gj N �• O > = • �; c�
C pr
cz cz Q y .. U cd r-v U O E"- p,.., U cz cz M in
-
C3 N 'O
,2-0 20 cC C U >+ ¢
cz t!�u" O >'.0 't7 `C En v
CA.�
° O
N
1 -4
U
°
cz
.�
Cd
H
Cd
�a
9J
9
a
S
S
S
S
U
•Cd
0
E
U.0 U
C% �� � ��
W •�
f. •t7 °
W
c
,moo >°Qb�
c°
Eoa�
cc r-
v,
y
°c�`z
�O
vw="
Q
W
q
..
...., .-
a cl ❑ •a .b �
4; U.-00 0
❑
a) �
�; °
cz
�Cl Cd .. °
O `d
�-..
�...
y
�
3 a,
° O"o
y
N y y 0 O
s ~ N
W
y,.
— 0
!� y N� C
•.r
0
>
co
Cd
O
hccNnOa.
aU
U U
Sv'fl
A:h2
°
o
w
�
�TV y
•;
0"a
•�[L...
Cc
0
—.0
'
3,�
"C
>o�
z
C4 W
C U
Ln
a
.�
°
O
cz a �
p
E'"
y
...
U
•�a�
�°
�
moo=
U U cz
b
..r U
cd
a
00
cd
CZ
L—I
F c
O
J U U
0
cz
p
�
0
. °CH
w
y .-.
U co
u =a.�
�' E cd
..c
U
�3
U
a °
A
E-0
>
ov
oV*
° °�''wo
v�
W
AEy2
A
¢�
�°c�•�
F-+Miinn
V cn
�
O
•a
"C1
�
1 -5
1 -6
U
a
cz
N
N
U_
U
tz
E
0 0
W
_
co
O
O 0
_
U
u
U
U �
oo�
=
��
}yr�
U
C:
W
v
R.
LO _
O
❑ v cz
_
co
°'
c
p
ca
>
O
N
Y�1
�
•�
�
+a.. N .
V p.'
-�
f1 C.
C4 tO
O U r
p U
a.�
y
U
•�
V
�
Cd w
�
ti
H
�3•
h3
W
_�
�
.= U
-4
r„ y
.� U
b ¢,c_N
N
U
_ b
W
vs
fl.o
Z7�x
d ox
«-�U
C),
= c
0
Ln &Of)
� U = ' H
}o V
Cc r
r%
�U
UcarsU
=O NN
v�
W =
E; oUO.� •3 �
.co v� v '�
c.
N
1 -6
Errata to Section 4.1.4
Over the course of the EIR revi
up to Lawrence Drive (Lots 1 -1f
be developed with single -story
envelopes specifying maximum
15 feet would be allowed at the
allowed in the front portions of
-.w, the applicant has agreed that all of the lots that back
on the original site plan used evaluated in the EIR) will
comes. All of these lots would have approved building
flowed building heights. A maximum building height of
rear of all lots, with a 20 foot maximum building height
specified lots toward the street (Stoneridge Drive).
For clarification, building height would be an absolute measurement, the highest point of
the building at any one point, rather than. an. elevation above average natural .grade.
Therefore, many of the original mitigations related to building height and massing would
be superseded by the following mitigation measure:
Lots 1 -17 shown on the revised site plan shall be limited to single -story development.
Building height shall be measured as the high est poi nt .of, the building above natural
grade, rather than an elevation above average natural grade as outlined.in the city's
zoning .regulations. A maximum -building height of 20 feet maybe allowed. At the
time of development plan .submittal, a plan for Lots 1 -17 addressing height and
privacy issues shall be submitted to the City Council for approval.
Implementation of the mitigation measure described above necessitates revisions to the
existing mitigation measures in Section 4.1.4; therefore, in conjunction with the previous
mitigation measure, the following revised mitigation measures would reduce the impacts to
neighborhood compatibility to a level of insignificance:
The rear lot setbacks for Lots 1 -17 shall be 25 feet.
The applicant shall install tree screening along the rear of Lots 1 -17 to insure further
protection of privacy for residents of Lawrence Drive at .the time of installation of
subdivision improvements. Tree screening shall include a mix of tall, open skyline
trees and medium to large shrubs a maximum of 15 feet high.
The following design restrictions shall be. implemented:
1.) Decks more than eight feet above natural ground level shall be prohibited;
and
2.) Massing of development must be such that no part of a building over 15 and
20 feet above the natural ground level may be within 30 and 50 feet of the
north property line, respectively.
■ A subsurface storm drainage system shall be constructed that runs from Lawrence
Drive to Meadow Creek.
Errata to Section 4.2.4
In addition, the second mitigation included in Section 4.2.4 on page 4 -40 listed below would
be superseded:
■ No more than 33 percent of the floor area would be on the second story. The
majority of the second story would be massed toward the street frontage of the lot.
The third mitigation listed in Section 4.2.4 on page 4 -40 would be modified to eliminate the
references to. second stoy development, from the second sentence as shown below:
■ Architectural review of sensitive lots ** (the. hillside lots and lots backing up to
Lawrence Drive) will be required prior to issuance of building permits for these lots.
This review shall consider thC SiLC and extent of -
a- —the placement of back-yard windows and .decks in relation to the adjacent
Lawrence Drive units. For hillside lots, architectural- review shall consider structure
elevations on a lot -to -lot basis.
* * In the case of the sensitive lots identified in the EIR, the proposed design
guidelines endorsed by Staff and the Architectural Review Commission,
indicate that the architectural review requirement included in the EIR would
be handled by planning staff review of plans for consistency with approved
building envelopes and the design guidelines prior to submittal of a building
permit, rather than a formal application for architectural review (see pages
6 -7 of the design guidelines).
E.
� �
Ordinance No. 1217 (1992 Series)
FINALLY PASSED this 4th day of
August
1992 on motion of Councilwoman Rappa , seconded by
Councilman Reiss , and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: Councilmembers Pinard and Roalman
r
ABSENT: None
'Mayor Ron - Dunin
ATTEST:
City rlerk Pam V e
jv k