HomeMy WebLinkAbout0149ARK! 10PIDMANCIr" 021AUTIle"PT UTY"OURMOD PMOPPIMITI "N") 0. 1). �20 '"I'3EATIPIMS,
VIT'si.mu-'a liro mv"u m. mu) xwum'.: G-'uw-G
1:J IT' 02 AVNTED by the Cotinuell o� th, dity or San *.Wls Oisrjo 'as :C!ollous.,
SECTIM I.: Thit t"d : 0110-wiliz dese:ztbe'd propdkty thmll be and iG lawal.l.-,
.Y
V,'Me'.1-ted to 0. De and Va'nsandtr
7xt tha Cit"Y 09 San LkAs Obispo,; Ailing on Additimia- z'*m--or'&?2Aag
Imp r'Hled for record September' 8� 1094� In tha� office
a'5�! the County of Saa Uzis Obispo Cn-u• ntY$ State 09 Cali-
EOT:A2, that portion. of Lots U and 12 described as fol lawn
-.
BEGrINT71-TO ot the ISE emme"r 0:7 Lot 12, Block 8 of the
-1.7hence S 290 431 W a distance oZ 38,07, 90-mv to
t -he point: o: begir-ning; thenco S 89' 431 W a distance of- 3.A3
th-ence, 0 cmue to the vi&%t with P- radiuvi of, 30 Ecet,
Oaro'-'84 an angle of 391 021, it distzaco of 20.44 kee-k; zhcnj-wa 1,1
K' 157 W zar!Zerlt to grw-d curve a diitauce of 28.56 EveZZ; thance
1.1 69' 43' E a distarme. of 12.70 L-eet; 0 emec. 8 51, is, g, a
t.vnnce of 40.95 ft e-%% to the trun. PoSint of begin-aing.
SECTION, 2. That the goll4"ii'y -4ng described p%opetty zfmlj be znd jo
In the City ajF Sem, Zusir. Obispo, Ariington tAidl-lion, accoi-ding
to Lhe man filed for record SeptemBer 8, 1894, in the oK-Uco. of
the Caanty Record= of San Luis Volar-0 Ccunty, State oX`
t7wit Portion of Lots 11 amd 12 de3cribed as foilcyps:
BEGIM-0114 tit the SE coruoy.- G-2 Lot 12, Bloc', 8 of the Azliv.'qzon
Addition; tbacmce S 89" 43' W a, distance C'f 38.07 feet; thence N'
51' 15' J? a distrance of 40-95 feet to tin. Ume point- o.r- begin-in'r,";
thellee 8 69' 143' V1 -a disiMnce o� 12.70 geat; thence 9 510 151 W
'Q dist-Mea 09 2.98 fcmat; t-honce along a cLxve to the left -ulth a
-P it
ladius ak 120 Reet �hzou&h =" ar.g.je r.,f 251 22, 30 a distance Of
53-15 feat; th-mics. N 89' 43' Z a diwnuce or. 32.35 feet; t1hezee
S 51® 15' B a dietance o-c- 38.41 :F-C'et to the tmie point. of bo'girr-
my.nr
SE,".1TIC-1114 3. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to 0-:Zecuto deeds Br: nting
said Property am" 4..ove-deceribed, . proviaed t1jalt o. D. u,-6g Beatrice Vansaxadt atid
,�amma '01. and LoulGe Z.. Gragg and tile contractor -hl ha-,Fie denocited a lotter or.
lettexs rvith the City, Clerk, stating th8t cmtisfaetory beea
mmilp for james "Ll. 'and Loa ice . E. Cr do to pay for.tho coat of the Amprovemnts
madle adJacent to the parcel belms corme-3yed to the orna
jp., sale, irgro-vammmE s
run-ming to Rentucky "Straet.
SECTION 4. TkU1.8 Ordinance, to ether t-JUh Ow ayes and noes, shall be p-t-,b-
141.011c"I 0-ace im ZU11, at least three days begone its passave, in thp-
to.
pvlAishad and cii:culntod L-a CA-old City,
'Sm-non shall so into off-Oct at: the e--pinto on Of th- irty e-mys �-er its Maw. pacoag.-a.
/ �'9
ti
iNTRODUCED AND PASSED TO PRINT thin 18th day of January, 1960 by tbie
following -vote:
AYES: Kenneth W. Jones, Donald Q. Miller., Gerald W. Shipsey, J. Barry
Smith
NOES: None
ABSEIrl : Fred M. Waters
Mayor
A'I'n 8 T -
r, 4r. 15 00,
W�A w"I
FINAXLY PASSED this . 1st day ok February,_, 1960 by the
follovying vote:
AYES: Kenneth W. Jones, Donald Q. Miller, Gearald W. Shipsey,
J. Barry Smith, Fred M. Waters
avrab: None
ABSENT: Bone
AT"TEST:
rcL KENTUCKY ST
M �
January U. 1960
Honorable Mayor and C3vy Council
San Luis Obispo
California
Gentlemen:
Since it appears that there maybe some controversy regarding the Gragg -
Vansandt street deed on Taft Street, I feel it is worthwhile to place in
writing my recollections of the events leading up to tonight's meeting.
My first contact with Mrs. Gragg was at the request of the Council, after
receipt of the petition of property oy-mers on Kentucky Street for formation
of an assessment district to force the installation of curb and gutter across
her Kentucky Street frontage. During this conversation she informed me that
she did not want to be the only person on the street holding back progress
but that she did not desire to place curb and gutter across her frontage
until the question was resolved as to whether she Has paying taxes on and
would be improving city owned property,
With Mr. Fitzpatrick's help, I investigated this and found that both her
city and county taxes were correct as assessed, I informed her that the
portion on Taft Street, to be deeded by the city,, varied in width from
approximately one foot at the Kentucky end to approximately ld feet at the,
rear of her lot., She informed me that it was'not: worth the curb and gutter
improvements for so small a portion of property, On this understanding, I
instructed my crew to prepare the property description under one parcel.
Meanwhile Mrs, Vansaridt, who had received the impression at the Council meet-
ing, that the Couneilss' action in passing an ordinance to print constituted
a final agreement for her to acquire the entire Taft Street frontage, had
proceeded with, the 'installation of' curb "gUjter arid tidowal:k across the
frontage of her :residence and curb and gutter 'along the Taft Street frontage
of the Grarxg property.'*' Mrs. Varisairidt' eAft— Tito Ilia office and asked whether
it would be proper for her to place sidewalk along the Taft Street frontage
of the Gragg "property. I informed: "het that the'city had no objection to this
or did it normally exercise any control regarding the limits of improvements
placed by a property vaner.
Some time later.- Mrs. Gragg informed me that.she.had all along dished to -
acquire,.tha.Taft Street frontage and that she objected to the installation
of sidewalk across this frontage since she 'intended to construct a° driveway
ramp here arid' "did, not Vish to' °g'o 'to "the' 'eVense "of tearing, 'out curb, gutter
and sidewalk in order to construet.the.ramp. I immediately called Airs,,
Vansandt and asked her to hold upon the sidewalk installation and informed
her that the city would describe the property on Taft Street in two parcels -
one fronting her residence and one siding the Gragg property. (this had been
agreed upon at the last Council meeting) She stated she had already contracted
Honorable Mayor and City Council i
January 18s, 1960
Page m2-
vith Mr, Lenger-for the full improvements and wanted to know how she could
be assured that she 'would not have tb pay for the full cost if she' did not
acquire all of the'property, 'I informed her that the Council would probably
deed the property to the highest bidder on the condition that the improvementa
were in and'paid for by the party receiving the property, I suggested that
she hold up payment of her contractor's ball until after the Council meeting,
so that if the Graggs acquire one parcel they could pay the contractor instead.
I informed both Mrs. Cragg and Mrs, gahsandt that the only way'I could see
to settle the problem was for both of them to attend tonight's meeting and
bid on the property if they gashed to acquire it.
Respectfully submitted,
David F. Romero
City Engineer
DFR/r
.CITY C
MISSION SAN LUIS OBISPO DE TOLOSA (1772)
; �_.._
CITY PLANNING DIVISION
Honorable Mayor and City Council
San Luis Obispo
California
Gentlemen:
>BISPO
December 7, 1959
CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
I
rrsrnl nrrnr�r 'rr
Request of 0. D. Vansandt, 1365 Taft Street, requesting the city
transfer to him a portion of Lots 11 and 12, Block 8, of the
Arlington Addition, which was deeded to the city by the State of
California following the construction of the freeway.
After study and discussion by the Planning Commission, it was duly
.moved and seconded that the land, as requested, be declared surplus
to the city's needs; that the city sell same with the stipulation
that the purchaser must install street improvements on the property
requested.
Respectfully submitted,
David F. Romero
Planning Director
DFR:JF /r
4
DEC 1959
R .IVED
pity clak
& Ll• 0, QAL 't
December 9, 1959
2324 Johnson Avenue
San Luis Obispo, California
City Council
San Luis Obispo, California
Gentlemen:
Problem -- Disposition strip of city property on Taft Street
fronting the O.D.Vansandt residence and extending
along the side of the J. M. Gragg property.
Recommendation- -The suggestion of the City Planning Com-
mission be accepted with one modification:
the parcel be divided into two sections. One fronting the
Vansandt property; the second adjacent to the Cragg property.
Sincerely yours,
Donald Q,. Miller
Councilman
1)
December 7, 1959
To Whom It May Concern:
We, the undersigned, property owners on the 500 block of
Kentucky Avenue request that the City Engineer investigate
the existing situation on our street.
The City is now in the process of repaving Kentucky Avenue.
Seven of the nine property owners on this block have recent-
ly installed gutters and curbs in front of their property.
The property owners of 522 and 526 Kentucky Avenue have not
done so. This detracts from the appearance of the street and
furtherrlore is a much needed improvement as our newly paved
street will be a path of mud when it rains. We feel that
after the expense we have gone to in order to crake our street
more attractive and a safer place for vehicles to operate on
that something should be done, if at all possible, to com-
plete the job already started.
Any cooperation we receive from your Department in order to
complete this job that cannot be efficiently executed unless
all property owners comply will be greatly appreciated by
the undersigned.
Respectfully submitted,
ME DUM
1
TO - -_ -- Planning Comm_�«r___
FROM ---- - ---------- gi—ty- -Clerk ------ - - - - --
is
DATE_______ November— 27 JL 1959 —_ ------- —__ _
SUBJECT___- Y99_ - -------------- - - - - --
The attached letter requesting title to Lots 11 & 12, Blk 8,
Arlington Addn were referred to you by tte City Council at
their last meeting on November 161 1959.
SCHWABACH ER- FREY CO. FORM SO -t
r
n 7
Vf&ffi of the City Council
City of San Luis Obispo, Cal.
Dear Sirs:
San Luis Obispo, Calif.
October 24, 1959
We are submitting a detailed map of a portion of
the Arlington Addition Block 8 as prepared by the
Pacific Engineers & Surveyors Inc.
We are interested in securing title to portion's of
Lot 11 and Lot 12 therein and shown on submitted map
colored with green pencil.
These small portions of property were purchased
by the state for right -of -way when the freeway was constructed
through San Luis Obispo and later the unused portion returned
to the City when the freeway was completed.
Our intention is to develop our property which is
zoned for R -4 and this narrow strip would give us the
additional footage necessary in our plans.
After confering with the City Engineers office, they
inspected the area and suggested that after we had our property
Surveyed and a detailed map drawn we would be better able to
present it to you members of the City Council for your approvel.
Mrs. Vansandt and myself thank you for your kind attention
to our problem and will gladly submit any other material necessary
to close this transaction.
Mr. 0. D. Vansandt
1365 Taft Street
San Luis Obispo, California,
GRANT DEED
The CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a municipal corporation,
pursuant to Ordinance No. 149 (1960 Series), hereby grants to
JAMES M. GRAGG and LOUISE GRAGG the following described real
property in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis
Obispo, State of California:
In the City of San Luis Obispo, Arlington Addition,
according to the map filed for record September 8,
1894, in the office of the County Recorder of San
Luis'Obispo County, State of California that portion
of Lots .11 and 12 described as follows:
BEGINNING at the SE corner of Lot 12, Block 8 of
the Arlington Addition; thence S 89° 43' W a dis-
tance of 38.07 feet; thence N 51° 15' W a distance
of 40.95 feet to the true point of beginning;
thence S 89° 43' W a distance of 12.70 feet; thence
N 51° 15' W a distance of 2.98 feet; thence along a
curve to the left with a radius of 120 feet through
an angle of 25° 22' 30" a distance of 53.15 feet; .
thence N 89° 43' E a distance of 32.35 feet; thence
S 51° 15' E a distance of 38.41 feet to the true
point of beginning.
Date_ May 3, 1960 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
By
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
State of California
County of San Luis Obispo
Personally appeared before me, the undersigned, a
Notary Public in and for the county and state aforesaid, the
within named Fred M. Waters, Mayor, and the within named
J. H. Fitzpattick, City Clerk, both officers of the City of
San Luis Obispo, a municipal corporation, who severally ac-
knowledged that as such mayor and as such City Clerk, and for
and on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo, they each signed
and delivered the foregoing deed of conveyance on the day and
year therein written, pursuant to the authority of an ordinance
duly adopted by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, a
municipal corporation.
Witness my hand and official seal of office this,
the 3rd day of May , 1960.
Notary Public
GRANT DEED
The CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a municipal corporation,
pursuant to Ordinance No. 149 (1960 Series), hereby grants to
0. D. VANSANDT and BEATRICE VANSANDT the following described
real property in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San
Luis Obispo, State of California:
In the City of San Luis Obispo, Arlington Addition,
according to the map filed for record September 80
1894, in the office of the County Recorder of San
Luis Obispo County, State of California, that por-
tion of Lots 11 and 12 described as follows:
BEGINNING at the SE corner of Lot 12, Block 8 of
the Arlington Addition; thence S 89° 43' W a dis-
tance of 38.07 feet to the true point of beginning;
thence S 89° 43' W a distance of 3.43 feet; thence
along a curve to the right with a radius of 30 feet,
through an angle of 39° 021, a distance of 20.44
feet; thence N 51° 15' W tangent to said curve a
distance of 28.56 feet; thence N 89° 43' E a dis-
tance of 12.70 feet; thence S 51° 15' E a distance- "
of,40.95 feet to the true point of beginning.
Date May 3, 1960
ATTEST:
City Clerk
State of California
County of San Luis Obispo
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
By
Mayor
Personally appeared before me, the undersigned, a
Notary Public in and for the county and state aforesaid, the
within named Fred M. Waters, Mayor, and the within named
J. H: Fitzpatrick, City Clerk, both officers of the City of
San Luis Obispo, a municipal corporation, who severally ac-
knowledged that as such mayor and as such city clerks and for
.and on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo, they each signed
and delivered the foregoing deed of conveyance on the day and
year therein written, pursuant to the authority of an ordinance
duly adopted by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, a
municipal corporation.
Witness my hand and official seal of office this,
the 4 clay of , 1960.
Notary Public