HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-19-2015 BAC AgendaAgenda-Updated on 11/13/15
Bicycle Advisory Committee
Council Hearing Room, City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo
Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 6:30 pm Note early start time
MISSION: The purpose of the Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) is to provide oversight and
policy direction on matters related to bicycle transportation in San Luis Obispo and its
relationship to bicycling outside the City.
ROLL CALL: Peter Deragon (Chair), Jim Woolf (Vice Chair), Lea Brooks, Paula Huddleston,
Catherine Machado, Howard Weisenthal, and Randol White.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
At this time, the public is invited to address the Committee concerning items not on the agenda
but are of interest to the public and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Bicycle
Advisory Committee. Comments are limited to five minutes per person. The Committee may
not discuss or take action on issues that are not on the agenda other than to briefly respond to
statements made or questions raised, or to ask staff to follow up on such issues.
MINUTES: Minutes of September 17, 2015. Approve or amend (Attachment 1)
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Avila Ranch Bicycle Facilities (Attachment 2, 3, 4)
2. San Luis Ranch Bicycle Facilities (Attachments 5, 6, 7)
3. 2016 Paving Areas (Attachment 8)
4. SLOCOG's Highway 227 Operational Analysis- ITEM ADDED 11/13/15
DISCUSSION ITEMS:
5. Committee Items
• Adopt -a -Trail Sub - Committee Report
Newcomers Sub - Committee Report
6. Staff Items
• SLOCOG's Edna Price Trail Draft Plan- ITEM ADDED 11/13/15
Bicycle Friendly Community Award
• Railroad Safety Trail and Bob Jones Trail Updates
• Transportation Staffing Update
ADJOURNMENT: The next regular meeting will be held January 21, 2016
The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs, and
y activities. Please contact the Clerk or staff liaison prior to the meeting if you require assistance.
ACTION ITEMS:
Agenda Item #1: Avila Ranch Bicycle Facilities
1.0 BACKGROUND
Avila Ranch, LLC has submitted a development plan proposal for a new, primarily residential
development on a 150 -acre site north of Buckley Road in the Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP).
As a new residential neighborhood, the applicant has included information on the project
circulation network, including proposed bicycle facilities.
Fula~ I Project Wcation
On September 17, 2015, the BAC initially reviewed the bicycle facilities plan for the Avila Ranch
development and provided comments. Prior to the completion of a Draft EIR, the applicant and
City staff are seeking feedback from the BAC on the updated plan for bicycle facilities in the
project. This report responds to the previous directional items from the BAC and updates
proposals for planned bicycle facilities.
2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
Avila Ranch is a proposed new master planned residential development. The project includes
approximately 700 dwelling units of various housing types, a centrally located "Town Center"
with 15,000 square feet of neighborhood- serving retail and office uses, and 16.0 acres of pocket
parks, mini -parks and neighborhood parks. Project amenities would include riparian corridor
enhancement, permanent open space dedication, community gardens and bike trails.
2.1 Proposed Bicycle Facilities
The proposed project includes Class I and Class II bike facilities on Buckley Road, Class II bike
lanes on proposed collector streets, and a Class I bike path bordering the Tank Farm Creek
corridor through the project. The project also proposes to extend Buckley Road and it
proposed bicycle facilities west to South Higuera. The following graphic shows the location of
proposed bike facilities as currently proposed by the applicant.
LEGEND
Existing Roads ■ ■ IR ■ ■ Proposed Buckley Extension
60' Collector Road ......... City Proposed Class I Bicycle Path
.......•••• 48' Residential Road
20' Residential Alley r ^ City Proposed Class II Bicycle Lane
Class I Bicycle Path Refer to Buckley Road street sections
Class II Bicycle Lane _ Refer to project creek sections
.g
•o
.a
:n
.j. }i•3•� /s
ON Entry
•*• Proposed Bus Stop Location
Eel
p ..*%a..*
1,- 01, . . . . . . .
.............
t i •
1]1i • ��
1 f
AVILA RANCH DEVELOPMENT PLAN Bicycle Clrculatlon Plan
3.0 PROJECT ANALYSIS
3.1 General Plan Guidance
rrm�
Section 8.1.6 of the LUCE identifies the Avila Ranch as a Specific Plan Area and provides
guidance for development of the site with a primary residential project (Attachment 2).
Consistent with this, the applicant has submitted a detailed development plan that provides
information on a wide array of project related features including land uses, site circulation,
infrastructure, and financing. To guide the development plan, Section 8.1.6 includes two
references to bicycle - related improvements:
h. Appropriate internal and external pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connections to the
City's circulation network.
i. Implementation of the City's Bicycle Transportation Plan including connections to the
Bob Jones Trail.
3.2 Airport Area Specific Plan Guidance
The AASP includes guidance on automobile, pedestrian and bicycle systems through the Airport
Area. The project development plan will be processed concurrently with a Specific Plan
Amendment. The Specific Plan Amendment will provide additional text and updated graphics to
the AASP to accommodate the development of the Avila Ranch as a new residential
neighborhood in Airport Area. The processing of the Specific Plan Amendment will assure that
the proposed development plan is consistent with existing and amended programs, policies,
and guidelines.
Section 6.2.4 of the AASP (Attachment 3) includes the specific policy goals and guidelines for
the development of bicycle facilities in the Airport Area. If policy changes are proposed during
the development review process, those changes will return to the Bicycle Advisory Committee
for consideration.
3.3 Bicycle Transportation Plan Guidance
The 2013 Bicycle Transportation Plan includes the following policies guiding development:
1.12 Where cul -de -sacs are used in subdivisions, pedestrian/ bikeway connections shall be
provided to through streets.
1.13 In complex traffic corridors ... the City may consider utilizing alternative design facilities
such as but not limited to colored pavement, bike boxes, and buffered bike lanes.
1.15 Intersections of Class I bike paths and roadways should align at 90 degrees, either at
crossings where motorists can be expected to stop, or a location completely out of the
influence or any other intersection.
1.16 Directional signs should be installed where bikeways intersect, turn, terminate, or at
bikeway connections.
1.17 Roundabouts or Traffic Circles: Designs shall provide bicyclists the choice of proceeding
through as either a vehicle or a pedestrian ...
1.18 At signalized intersections, bicycle traffic shall be considered during the development of
traffic signal timing ...
1.19 New or modified traffic signals along designated Class II or III bikeways shall include
detection for bicycles.
1.36 Vandal resistant lighting shall be provided for all Class I bikeways ...
2.10 Bicycle parking shall be provided where direct connections between surface modes of
transportation are made and at public parks, plazas, and other recreation facilities.
4.6 New bikeways shall be considered a priority for installation in advance of, or during the
first phases of development.
3.4 Response to BAC Comments
Among the many individual comments made at the 9 -17 -15 BAC meeting, there were several
broad issues with respect to the project's bicycle facilities that received more general
consensus from Committee members. The following includes these general issues with the BAC
comment in bold and italics, followed by the applicant's response:
1. The project should meet City standards.
Applicant's response: The applicant proposes to comply with City standards. Buckley Road
right -of -way adjacent to the project site is in the County. The County standard for Class II
lanes on Buckley is 5.5 feet; the City standard is 6.5 feet based on grade, design speed, and
parking. Current sections show bike lanes that are eight feet (8') wide.
2. The project should comply with the Bicycle Transportation Plan.
Applicant's response: The applicant proposes to comply with the overall intent of the
Bicycle Transportation Plan. All project related facilities identified in the Bicycle
Transportation Plan would be provided with the exception of Class II bike lanes over the
existing roadway bridge on Buckley Road. In that location, westbound cyclists would be
directed to an on -site Class I bicycle path on the north side of Buckley Road through signage
prior to coming to the section of roadway over the bridge where there is not sufficient
width to accommodate a Class II bicycle lane. In the eastbound direction, the applicant is
pursuing the possibility of installing a bridge on the south side of the roadway that would
accommodate eastbound bicyclists on a separated path.
3. Provide a phasing plan for bike facilities. Goal is to have on -site facilities developed in the
early stages of the project and have the project facilities connect to adjacent facilities.
Applicant's Response: A phasing plan is being developed and will be included in the BAC
agenda packet or provided at the BAC meeting. The goals are to have adjacent streets and
bike facilities accompany and accommodate planned phasing of residential development.
4. Minimize curves in Class I bike paths.
Applicant's Response: The bike path has a straighter trajectory with fewer curves.
5. Consider developing buffered bike lanes on the Collector streets.
Applicant's Response: The cross sections located on the Bicycle Circulation Plan (above) and
shown on Sheet P -5 (Attachment 4) shows a 7 -foot wide bike lane on Collector Streets. City
Transportation staff indicated that the street section could be modified to narrow travel
lanes from 12' to 11' and to increase bike lanes from 6' to 7'. This exceeds the requirement
of the Bicycle Transportation Plan which prescribes 5' for bike lanes without adjacent
parking, and with design speeds of less than 35 mph, and allows for further buffering for
cyclists.
Staff Recommendation: Review the applicant's proposed design and response to BAC
comments and determine whether the following proposed project components are consistent
with the Bicycle Transportation Plan. For any components found not to be consistent, the BAC
shall determine whether or not they support the inconsistency.
1. Design of proposed bicycle facilities. It is assumed that the project will comply with City
standards and Bicycle Transportation Plan policies identified in this report.
2. Location of proposed bicycle facilities.
3. Timing of installation of bicycle facilities.
Agenda Item #2: San Luis Ranch Bicycle Facilities
1.0 BACKGROUND
Coastal Community Builders has proposed a project that includes several entitlements that
would ultimately lead to the development of the 131.3 -acre property previously known as the
"Dalidio Ranch" and "San Luis Marketplace ". The project includes a mixture of residential and
non - residential uses, as well as the preservation of agricultural uses and open space. The
project site is currently outside the City, but within its Sphere of Influence, and would require
annexation. The project as proposed is envisioned to implement the policies as articulated in
the recent Land Use and Circulation Elements (LUCE) update, and be consistent with the
development parameters set forth in the LUCE.
Applicant
Coastal Community Builders
"
Representative
Brian Schwartz and Marshall`
t . .- ,
Och Iski
General Plan and
Specific Plan Area (various`:
Zoning
land use designations
including — residential,
commercial, office, open
space and agriculture
consistent with the Land Use
Element)
P:
J
Site Area
131.3 acres
" \
Environmental
An Initial Study has been
7 -- • ; ._,_ f ''
Status
prepared to identify issues
and guide EIR preparation.
2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
The project includes a mix of residential, commercial, and office uses while preserving
substantial areas of open space and agriculture on a 131.3 -acre property. The intent is for the
project to be consistent with the development parameters described in the City's recently
updated Land Use Element, which envisions up to 500 residential units, 200,000 square feet of
commercial uses, 150,000 square feet of office, 200 hotel rooms, at least 5.8 acres of parks,
while preserving 50% of the site in agriculture and open space.
ti y
NC ,:�• rt ,r /�
V or
3
r � •
Neighborhood General One
Neighborhood General Two
Neighborhood Commercial �• /+
Parrs and open space •'�
[ Agriculture '',� *• ��
tr
2.1 Proposed Bicycle Facilities
The project design was developed following four guiding principles including:
"Son Luis Ranch will create a multimodal community that integrates seamlessly into existing
circulation systems. Designed to promote a pedestrian and bicycle- oriented community, San
Luis Ranch will be an interconnected neighborhood. It also completes a key component of the
Bob Jones Trail, extends Froom Ranch Way, and provides a transit hub, benefitting the
community as a whole."
The project proposes to extend the Bob Jones Trail through the site and develop Class II bike
lanes within the project boundaries on Froom Ranch Way and Dalidio Drive (Attachment 5).
3.0 PROJECT ANALYSIS
3.1 General Plan Guidance
The City's Land Use Element includes identifies the need for circulation connections to integrate
the site with the surrounding circulation systems (Attachment 6).
3.2 Bob Jones Trail Preliminary Alignment Guidance
The Bob Jones Trail Preliminary Alignment planning document identifies the trail design
standards and path amenities including rest parking areas (Attachment 7).
3.3 Bicycle Transportation Plan Guidance
The 2013 Bicycle Transportation Plan includes the following policies guiding development:
1.12 Where cul -de -sacs are used in subdivisions, pedestrian/ bikeway connections shall be
provided to through streets.
1.13 In complex traffic corridors ... the City may consider utilizing alternative design facilities
such as but not limited to colored pavement, bike boxes, and buffered bike lanes.
1.15 Intersections of Class I bike paths and roadways should align at 90 degrees, either at
crossings where motorists can be expected to stop, or a location completely out of the
influence or any other intersection.
1.16 Directional signs should be installed where bikeways intersect, turn, terminate, or at
bikeway connections.
1.17 Roundabouts or Traffic Circles: Designs shall provide bicyclists the choice of proceeding
through as either a vehicle or a pedestrian ...
1.18 At signalized intersections, bicycle traffic shall be considered during the development of
traffic signal timing ...
1.19 New or modified traffic signals along designated Class II or III bikeways shall include
detection for bicycles.
1.36 Vandal resistant lighting shall be provided for all Class I bikeways ...
2.10 Bicycle parking shall be provided where direct connections between surface modes of
transportation are made and at public parks, plazas, and other recreation facilities.
4.6 New bikeways shall be considered a priority for installation in advance of, or during the
first phases of development.
4.0 BAC REVIEW
The applicant is seeking preliminary feedback on the proposed location and design of bicycle
facilities, timing of their installation and connection to off -site facilities, and compliance with
the Bicycle Transportation Plan. The BAC may also provide input on suggested project
amenities that support bicycling, and what should be included in the project Environmental
Impact Report (EIR).
Staff Recommendation: Review the applicant's proposed design and through majority
consensus provide input on the following topics:
Compliance with Bicycle Transportation Plan
1. Location of proposed bike paths and bike lanes and their connection to off -site facilities
2. Design of proposed bike paths and bike lanes
3. Timing of installation of bike paths and bike lanes
Other Input
4. Project features /amenities that support bicycling
5. Information that should be included in the Project EIR.
Agenda Item #3: 2016 Paving Areas
Next year the City will be resealing Paving Areas 1 and 8 (see Attachment 8). BAC members
should review these areas on the map and provide staff with any recommendations for
proposed bicycle improvements, including striping changes.
Agenda Item #4: SLOCOG's Highway 227 Operational Analysis
Increased traffic congestion and safety concerns along Highway 227 between Tank Farm Road
and Los Ranchos Road led the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) board in June
2015 to fund an operational analysis of the corridor. The study will explore short and longer
term improvements to address the issues. As a first step in the process, SLOCOG staff is seeking
BAC input on the current issues and conditions. After a brief presentation by SLOCOG staff,
BAC members should provide feedback on the issues or concerns that should be addressed.
Agenda Item #5: Committee Items
• Adopt -a -Trail Sub - Committee Report (Brooks and Huddleston)
• Newcomers Sub - Committee Construction Signage (Brooks)
Agenda Item #6: Staff Items
• SLOCOG's Edna Price Trail Draft Plan- comment period ends 1/8/16
• Bicycle Friendly Community Award
• Railroad Safety Trail and Bob Jones Trail Updates
• Transportation Staffing Updates
• Items for next meeting:
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Minutes of the September 19, 2015 BAC meeting
2. Avila Ranch Land Use Element Excerpt
3. Airport Area Specific Plan Excerpt
4. Avila Ranch Circulation System Cross Sections
5. Proposed San Luis Ranch Bicycle Facilities
6. San Luis Ranch Land Use Element Excerpt
7. Bob Jones Trail Preliminary Alignment Excerpt
8. San Luis Obispo Paving Area Map (Zones 1 and 8 scheduled for 2016)
Attachment 1
Draft Minutes
Bicycle Advisory Committee
Council Hearing Room, City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo
Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 7:00 pm
9
10 MISSION:
11 The purpose of the Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) is to provide oversight and policy
12 direction on matters related to bicycle transportation in San Luis Obispo and its relationship to
13 bicycling outside the City.
14
15 ROLL CALL:
16
17 CM Deragon called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
18
19 Present: Pete Deragon (Chair), Jim Woolf (Vice Chair), Howard Weisenthal, Lea Brooks, Paula
20 Huddleston, Randol White
21
22 Absent: Catherine Machado
23
24 Staff: Peggy Mandeville, John Rickenbach
25
26 PUBLIC COMMENT:
27
28 Myron Amerine, resident and County Bicycle Advisory Committee member, reported that
29 Caltrans had updated its highway manual, which he will submit to staff for review.
30
31 MINUTES: May 21, 2015
32
33 Action: CM Deragon moved to approve the minutes as amended. CM Woolf seconded the
34 motion. The motion passed unanimously.
35
36 ACTION ITEM:
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Agenda Item # 1: Avila Ranch Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Ms. Mandeville provided an overview of the project.
John Rickenbach, City Planning Dept., provided project details as well as design challenges for
bicycle connectivity and discussed starting up the EIR.
Steve Peck, client's representative, discussed the project phasing and compliance with City and
County requirements.
The Committee discussed clarifications and details with Mr. Peck, including the location of the
Class I bike trail; confirming the project proposes a Class I bike path on the north side of
Buckley Rd. all the way to South Higuera Street and frontage improvements that include Class II
bike lanes on both sides of Vachell Lane and Buckley Road with the exception at the Buckley
Road bridge where there is no room for bike lanes. He clarified that the subdivision entrance on
Buckley would not be signalized and that the project includes several single lane roundabouts
Attachmenit
1 within the interior of the site. He also noted that the intersection of Vachell Lane and Buckley
2 Road may need to be signalized in the future.
3
4 Ms. Mandeville noted that the City's Bicycle Transportation Plan calls for continuous bike lanes
5 on Buckley Road.
6
7 CM Brooks felt the bike paths should be designed to Caltrans standards and be 12 feet in width
8 whether within the City or County. She also wanted a larger bridge area on Buckley to
9 accommodate the bike lanes.
10
11 Mr. Rickenbach stated that the phasing would be in conjunction with road developments and
12 improvements.
13
14 Mr. Peck discussed the connectivity to Trader Joe's shopping center and outlined the open
15 spaces, noting that the project Community Facilities District (CFD) would maintain the trails_
16
17 CM Brooks noted that bike lanes would be needed on Suburban in order to provide through
18 bike facilities.
19
20 The public comment period was opened.
21
22 James Parks, resident, was concerned about more development being planned in light of the
23 drought/water shortage.
24
25 Myron Amerine discussed the update to the County Bike Plan and the criteria for Class 1
26 facilities. He agreed all bike paths should be 12' wide and the project needed to be designed for
27 "Complete Streets ".
28
29 The public comment period was closed.
30
31 The Committee discussed the project and through consensus, provided the applicant with the
32 following recommendations:
33
34 ■ The project design should meet City standards.
35 ■ The project should be consistent with the City's Bicycle Transportation Plan.
36 ■ Phasing priorities include:
37 1) Extending the project bike lanes and sidewalks north of the project to
38 Suburban Road
39 2) Installing bike lanes and sidewalks on Suburban Road to provide connectivity
40 to shopping center and South Higuera
41 3) Extending the project Class I bikepath to South Higuera Street near the
42 Octagon Barn
43 4) Installing buffered bike lanes where possible.
44 5) Constructing off -site improvements that improve bike /ped access to schools
45 utilized by project
46 6) In the EIR, addressing project phasing and consistency with the Circulation
47 Element and specifically its 20% bike mode split objective
48
49 The Committee emphasized their desire that the project provide connectivity to
50 the nearby shopping center and South Higuera Street in the first phase of the
51 project. They also prioritized the development of onsite bicycle facilities that
52 extend offsite to connect with existing facilities of the same class (ie. Class I or
53 Class 11) over the development of only the onsite facilities terminating at the
54 project boundary because that would result in a discontinuous network.
Attachment 1
1 ■ Future graphics and presentations need to clearly represent development details
2 including the location of each type of bike facility proposed on and off -site and the
3 phasing of their installation.
4
6 DISCUSSION ITEMS
7
8 Agenda Item # 2: Committee Member Items
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Adopt -A -Trail Subcommittee Report
CM Brooks provided an update of her efforts to develop a pilot program.
Newcomers Subcommittee Report
CM Brooks discussed efforts to get bike - friendly information to new residents and
developments via realtors and developers. She noted that with assistance from the San Luis
Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG), the information can be customized for each
development.
Public Comment/Presentation Item Time Limits
CM Huddleston discussed her desire for imposing time limits on public comments and outside
presentations made to the Committee.
The Committee agreed that public comments should generally be limited to 3 -5 minutes and
that presentation items on the agenda be allotted 5 -10 minutes and these limits should be
enforced by the Chair.
Bob Jones Trail Bike Bridge at LOVR
Ms. Mandeville discussed the existing grade -level crossing at LOVR, noting that a grade
separated crossing is identified in the Bike Plan, but there is currently no funding for the project.
CM Brooks felt the Bike Plan needed to be reviewed and priorities reset based on available
funding /budgets.
Ms. Mandeville reported on a recent meeting with the County regarding the Bob Jones Trail
(LOVR to the Octagon Barn). It was agreed that City will proceed with environmental review for
this section and submit it to the County for General Plan conformity review.
CM Woolf noted the design work needed to be started as soon as possible, given the long lead -
time involved with the project.
Agenda Item #3: Staff Items
Bike Parking for Large Events — Follow -Up
Ms. Mandeville reported her follow up with the Special Events Committee regarding providing
bike parking at large events.
Construction Signage Follow -Up
Ms. Mandeville stated that she had discussed the issue of construction signs being placed in
bike lanes and that City standards were going to be updated to clarify the regulations.
2015 -2016 Approved Bike Projects
Ms. Mandeville reviewed the list with the Committee.
k
1 Railroad Safety Trail and Bob Jones Trail Updates
2 Ms. Mandeville notified the Committee of the CTC staff recommendation to fund the Railroad
3 Safety Trail- Taft to Pepper project.
4
5 MEMBER COMMENTS
6
7 CM Brooks requested that the Committee discuss the Bike Plan priorities at a future meeting.
8
9 CM Brooks asked for clarification regarding which electric /motorized vehicles (e.g. Segways
10 and mopeds) are allowed on Class I facilities.
11
12 ADJOURN:
13
14 CM Woolf moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:30 p.m. to the next regular meeting of November
15 19, 2015. CM Weisenthal seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
16
17 Respectfully submitted,
18
19 Lisa Woske
20 Recording Secretary
Ailtad�nent 2
Chapter 1
8.1.6. SPA, Avila Ranch Specific Plan Area
Location: Avila Ranch is located on the north side of Buckley Road at the far southern edge of the City of
San Luis Obispo. The three parcels that make up the Avila Ranch area comprise approximately
150 acres. The entire site is located within the Airport Area Specific Plan.
Purpose: This area will be developed as primarily a residential neighborhood development with
supporting neighborhood commercial, park, recreation facilities, and open space /resource
protection. Within the project, emphasis should be on providing a complete range of housing
types and afford abilities. The specific plan for this area should consider and address the
following land use and design issues:
a. Provision of a variety of housing types and affordability levels.
b. Modification of the Airport Area Specific Plan to either exclude this area or designate it as a
special planning area within the Airport Area Specific Plan.
c. Provision of buffers along Buckley Road and along eastern edge of property from adjacent
agricultural uses.
d. Provision of open space buffers along northern and western boundaries to separate this
development from adjacent service and manufacturing uses.
e. Provision of open space buffers and protections for creek and wildlife corridor that runs
through property.
f. Safety and noise parameters described in this General Plan and the purposes of the State
Aeronautics Act; or other applicable regulations relative to the San Luis Obispo Regional
Airport.
g. Participation in enhancement to Buckley Road and enhancement of connection of Buckley
Road to South Higuera Street.
h. Appropriate internal and external pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connections to the City's
circulation network.
i. Implementation of the City's Bicycle Transportation Plan including connections to the Bob
Jones Trail.
j. Water and wastewater infrastructure needs as detailed in the City's Water and Wastewater
Master Plans. This may include funding and /or construction of a wastewater lift station.
k. Fire protection and impacts to emergency response times.
I. Architectural design that relates to the pastoral character of the area and preserves view of
agrarian landscapes.
m. Provision of a neighborhood park.
Page 1 -90
a) 'o
O E "'
E�oc`oc`o
° Ca
O >
O 0
c
H p O N Cu
L wCO��
f0 O C N C
�
y a° o >,
U_
0) -C 0
ao
0-0 a C N
c a) Cu CL
o '0 Cu H
O — M O N a)
(n w •0 A
w (1) t
U_ ++
O
UEa)
> O -0
3
aa'io� =ca
O a) EO
•0Eo E
4M O O C.N
U) v a._
M � '~ N O O N C O O
(N O � M
C � oa
O C c > U •�
COL CLL
C — O
ca cu�U U.S
0
c $
Cu U
�
�
0
U
w
N N
U � O
N a7 O
CD
CL
O U
aL+ C M
O
t0
CL co a
N (D
U ��' fo
E C
U) E2 p
U) O
_N M o A
U o` U is coo
Na � � E+�+
O (n
U
N �
O o•O nQ o
d-Z
aW
LU
(5a2
ma
2�
d O W
aF-
� Q
am
Q
O
v!
V
0
0
a
n
m
LO, o
O y
' f7
W w
Y
`m O
a�
w
C
`-° a'
� o
Q L
>,'E E C (+0 C fn O- O N 7 ''' w
V C O C C f0 w N O E 4- N ++
L N y M CO O O O p ,� E O> u)
CD CL
0- a ca = Co a> ai U �n o
0 0 0 M t C L N U w °_ CD V O C
co o
V � Y a7 U L C + .0 O
O C O C U W`` O_ rn
O N O U c C— 2 C t O. O O O O
E-D O) o O (5p 3 C rr O w CO o ff+ d�
a)
EO n N .N >, N E •C O 0 C m o'—
U O a)
N O C N = >, t p t0 . +. M C N
C 70 Co U O� N+ a E 7 U 0 `J a)
N V C U C O L C CO N 'V V" N N O w
co E L L "NO'' ~ C (O N" V N C C N N
a�a�Hw� oca���wcaoc;�
E a ��(D (n �yv�U0
Q E fZ c c w
+�N � a �( >, CO a)
� C U o E � 3'V O
� 0 O �a
>>, 7 c �'� w O` - o c; o C
3
cc rn U a7 Co 7 E t .0 U w O 0 M (0 CC
a) O .0 O O N E O N C� a a) E a d o
_ > �. U
Co o Co c c o mc•E a� o o C o
C O R M CU O) N— O C O a) U-0 C O N
U E'er `m 6-M T "M 3 m EH 0 aa) M(D a�
C
O
U
(D
Ln
.c
Lo
d
CM
2
L
Co
0
Ix
O
Co
CL
18
0
0
CL
12
m
a�
a
� I
w,
a;
w
N:
m'
vl
Q,
A
'gypp
N
'°
E
U
U
M
•S
O
L
.0
C
M
N
a)
a�
0
0
m
0
CL
CL
m
a�
0
r�
w
0.
w
N
c
f0
v
Q
v
w
O
m
a'
E
LL
Y
C
Co
H
L
o �-
a
E °
c Z;
m o
w
c C
O N
N w f0
E _rn
Fn
Od
m
_O
U)
f0
T
N
C
w I
0
w
J a
2.2
awi 0
c
m
U
v�
m
a
M L
00
•00 l6
o O
a
CL
— m
�o
C
O
U
a�
C
l6
N
LL
C
f0
U)
E
m
U-
0)
o m
'= O
3 m
j — L
as <
° s
C
o 3 o
U Cc d
� n CL
O °
C L
cd 4-
O O
M to C O
-a coE
7
_am
°.
C .N
.0
V - .:
C
(p _
N U _O
� Q
w
f0 O
fC �
N U fin
U w L N
n
Cx M
w O O
cn U C 0
vE�(D
Co0?3v°i
co
�. -0
E °
Cn CO
:3 O
In 0
- >, O_
tM
N O U -0
vaa
O
o4-a�o
O
3 N
O C A
0>
U) (A "O
(D
m Q � a)
Attachment 3
d L
c w
m 0
'a co
m 0
CL
c a
m �
N
US O
0 U
a� ..
U
C w
w c
>O
N 30 >
fOL,U
fn m (L
c
0
Y
C
O
7 N
U) 75
U
C
LL O`
Y
f0 L
�U
C
3
0 m
L C
N
N �
C
v�
Co
M
NC
W
f0 a
C
O
.0
N
•c
N ''
V/
v
O
m
m
w
O
N
a
w
co
w
d
c
m
v
m
c
f0
7
O
IC
v
C
O
U)
(0
LL
Co
M
w
O
M
a
0
0
0
CL
CL
M
U
O y
w�
`y O
CL
w
C L
l6 a7
v o
QL
N
C
f`6
N
7
Of
O
rn
v
0 C
o
m�
; U)
o 'C
s 0 o V °
C C vi
U
saoM pCoo
oNa Cowv
0.2 C a) .D C a
EH cr E o >,m
U Co ~ O U cca 3
CU n aJ O w C
V >, C L fn a) -D
0 m ai p-t N M
L
CL U O C t O U
Q� X C O
M w
M
C j�a)
Nmo
d 0 70 ° a C_a o
NOm —rn
O0CL
00aa�3�
-v :p Q
C O o 0 s Cn
O
N alt C+L-'� >+L
_ ++
NN O U O (D - -O
w CD N C
O o N C o a7
U o o 0 O N .V
EL m E a) 92 3
t
H to w 4. W 0 w Q
N
_m1
a W
W
�0
ma
Lb 2
v Q '�
LU
N O H
O fn
Q
~ 1O
o
y
J V
V
m
a
Y
,O
N
y
y
CO
U
m
00
m
0
E
k
W
C!tachment
z
0
0
CL
co
Z
9
ad
Z
O
g
D
U
V
�J
> c'
C m !0
l0
m
c0
L y
C
cc
s rn
d
m
v
w °'y Q
'a
��
m�
2 H m O
3s
N= (n
a`Ui
E O
E
E O
C
c C y
m m
N
E
v
y
N
C U
N c0 � N�
m
E
O c0
E
O CO
E
o w
W
c () �
� L
I
�+4
c
W.
C T3 O y
O a`
LL
fN 0
JT
C
O E 0 y
m
� p
O
Y LL
O
p
>, m
0
O
`
( O
c to
Q
E
o v
O) `� �p
m f g
L O y
>. u)
cp o
>, o
m m
>, 0
cp o>,
o
t m <O c
1p
c <°
m CD
c2
cn
f
o:
Y
D
N .V
> >� N
to
y
N
m
= C w t
f)
C
l�
in N
,0O
> ca
is
a�
;
Em om
3w
'2mym�v
O
o `m
O
��
�
c -au) !E
rn
0
'?
md3
Z�
c
E
c
N
4 d �p
o
o f a� um
a��
r- d
c�
O. r
O Y U
N
3 C
3 r`
O
t t N a
(
N
Q d
2<
rn
N'c�
.c
c
cY
c
3
c
3
a
o
o
ai i
�� as
c
�
c
c
c
O m
I pO
o
Y E
Y
E
c
vrn ' j
a�v cm o
v
v;
�
5)
y
y oN 3
y
��m
N
�•-
a)
�E
:
a�i
C
W J cn
Hnd
WUQUUUws
m
C
N Om nm
i m�
•E -
E
EwI
N
d
x
a)
H
d
E,0
v)
d
O
C
C
Q
7
J
C
N
C m
N
7
O
>
8
CO =
2,o
c a
c) m
7
21
Y
U
= E
O`
N
LL
o
U
C
O
Nom;
� U
W N
S O)
N
E
=
> C
) m
y o
�
2
O
m
O�
u) c
m
C
c0
>
c�
me
c=
kv
°
U €�
°o
c°n
E
m
v�
O
°
m
d
m
'~
E Li
:?
C
2,
a
E N
rn
w
,°
o o
E
c
w
G
O c
O c
c
O E
y
m v
C
N
N
m
m
Nd
yLL�~
C
co
`
€
m
Vfn
E `
m
7
c 'C
7
c 'C
LL O
m YFt
LL Y
m m�
N
j
'C....
N
c C
N Y
LL {_�pp m
Y U 2
O
LL
Y d
>+
Y 7
f`O E
0)
0
p
C m
O
c
(L Y
dY
m (p
CDLL
m~
ln a)-0Y
7
d
m
mIH:3
m
2HUmu
7
C!tachment
z
0
0
CL
co
Z
9
ad
Z
O
g
D
U
V
�J
Attachment 3
uj
0
a
c
0
U
C
d
O
b
0
LO
N
O
O
IAP
U
LL
U
w
CL
w
ix
Q
Of
O
n
a
O
(L
U)
Co
O
CO
J
Z
Q
N
a?
m
Attachment
Lrna� a)NChc°a� ca�a�o��vL 4-00 -o 0-0-0
CCU0 c°a�o °oS _c`a u - mcco�o c��c�§CCOCCC
° m M Cl) UN NmL 3 �$ �� �� c o c a.� vi oZZ z
U) c �-C c p C–c0 �� cNO v�a)�c O
m m a H r O C N tV (n fn a) c a) C m 0` (A H
N O Co f '.0 � N V M .O .O O O O Ln m Cc + a.
Cc N C m O j U >,mm pCD CL .O NmLn
d o LL O a �� a) � C a) a� N� c rnv�
3�U� 0 ccu m �° a� aNi a� Coot N c
U 'O N Cu N O N a -05 C m J a) L f- C C Cep O B a) of N z
+. 1 Ca
am c � ��o �– MC14 —0 CD Ta(0 � Co Li o:° � N O Z9 E Cn ° O
of U- c 7 to Co 3 O V C) — CV v a L Q
CD m m N O m N r a) m N L Co CO c V Cc CD O O
o p E o� o U a) > o= Cn N m � +`' N�� U
CO Cu -0 m� N E �Cpp� N O N �' 2 Z_' a) Y O �_
O w LL (n a) m o m O .- +�+ m c� >. N U ,O Cr C (L o U C C -0 V
M m a) N C C N O a) O N w m L a) C
O a) �, C m O }' E LCD YI O O Y J C) U rL-. LL_ IO U a a)
>> U ~ -00 �° l_ CU
c r- C ` O E H O m a) C N : m E�- N ai
O m m N yY m m !0 �L c_ >:p. Q c `��. N
-0 N m r-_3c' J Cr N o cz os N- h Ca C vY �(n•-
` O O v cfl d ` Q� -v - — E O N C m
a) rr at O c�L00 v o 0 � NU)— (D Of N O+ a) o c
LN ccao° 1 mco vo 3a� a)MC �E
a) M C C a) d a) m CO N 0"— E W- E a) � 0 O C t A _0) m
ron >% ° M N o a) > N O Q m .m O a) c o �c v Q a) O m w 2 N o 2 Cr OD M
a) U m W O C C) L C O CO o Co ` rn J C) N lA i C t °
L C V w a Q a _ C m N Q m Cl) O j Co
rn U -0 LL H a)�0 L� °o y ;z -0 L-- oo
E 3 Y m a) m +r Cn a) H -N •• 0 Co -C U L Q m tl) - (n om
oOj ) v'C..oa N Ua)Ua0ON N = a)a)c��c�c�a
LL mm0 O m –U (nom V m� oQitu) >-o N b ��� Ou °U o M M
a) CD C L L v_) -O -0 `~ m N CAL () () a) L a) '0 C ' L_ L_ a) -0 •O
m° C L) 0 4- 01 O O O> ' m �>- .L. +L. m m L L C O 7 �. O m
m� `�° O•cmm a� oU o aCL ° ° �`" o N N Ew
CL M >, 10
y a) Y 0— m V o O U C ° ZE o N m a) C `� E
0 r- CW m a O L D O a) �-D m L C C� N �� O N N M o
Q C 4- �. -00 W 3 N N N d O a) ;�% -0 �' O a) Oa vNi O O N aa)i N _0 a o
�"� oL �'� > c.r 3 N_0 m N a) ` M 0 a o�� o c c ac) c c�
CD ° o�-a Y N cNU °� m o -E `~ o o— m ° a) a) c`�Mo a) m o >,
NV 3 �v oa)a�S >CCO�ON W�3L — ILLI_m++L a) ~ >a�
~ C Q N L) O N 0 .0 O rL-. � C 3 CO CCS Y L O L O L V
E ?p T) a� m -0 C0 a) -0 os y �� fd� o 3� C"-oUm
>v m o CD cp aL maaH a� L �- 3 Cu CL U) Cu U a (D
-2 aot o
Z rn a m (n – O a) r+ Y N N (n c Q N m 0-0
N c
c mm a)3m 3 N
ctQU�sv c c�° oaomOo�a) Uc`ma) °gym moa)o
c"_'Q °� o o(n0CD V(DNo =– mpL Oat Ho U�cUOa
m m t m Y N CO m– .N m y U O O C E O a O V- N a) >, Y N lA_ N CL
U
° m C a m o CLM 0 N U avU) CLL U `O N L m ac) C
� N• -:rH•c N C� N 0 0 0— o =Y m o °- O a).-. a) o•a�
aa)�'a oao cam o-o�� o cLi aL or mom
m+ ,� C N 01 Y L L m 7 C U a) r' N a a) - '>
a�Nm-0 (D U) o oNNcQ� L m CL-v° Q CD
H "' N C U '� O a m L "'' U° N m L 3 7 a) O m L m a) O L C.) O L cn
cD L) in 0 {�0 a fCC N L ° N �_ C m L C o C`C p t U o: 0 L o a t N N N
7 N j a - O c .m +m+ .m ` �' +. a (`p 7 V �, L- N"+ C CM o
d O m U , m a) > c a) i N C +, - C Cc +� m a) m 4--
t a) N C
H V aD av, m�0 � j E., .r aC o 6 E o —•3 o N mU — :3-0 —. cv a
U L U Y J 41 N m CV 'C L > N L Q C
L V C O m m� L `~ aJ- b m C m Cl. m °-)L m 0 L° m 0 3 C m C
V
CO m COO o H m. (n(nZ mp m a�uUU CO HRH U o N m Q °D CD
3
w
0
Ii'!j'
(S
hi:
IC
r
I,
0
(a
Attach ���
�� a
Qu
in
CO)
C
0
(D
CO
CO
:3
m
z
CL
z
LU
0
.j
LU
W
z
i
Q
Z
O
G
2
Q
� F
Y
m
w I
v
H �
V
w
O x
a r r
1
a �
• ti
m
O
U '
_ r
d m
Y C
00
Y
w
V 1
f—
V
O
a
�tachmeig
�
CL
ul
Z �.
0
u
V
w
I ~
Q
CL
cc
w
Y
w °
W �
U
m m
U E o
w m
O m °
(L h
a
cn
O
0
N
a
U
N
O
^L
I..L
- --
Z
Q
J
0
IL
o
o
�
w
•
J
J
.E
W
>
t Z
t
V
w
• �
T
T
I �
• V
Q
w
• ?d
o
a
w
•x
H
w
• �
v~i
U
w
d
1
a �
• ti
m
O
U '
_ r
d m
Y C
00
Y
w
V 1
f—
V
O
a
�tachmeig
�
CL
ul
Z �.
0
u
V
w
I ~
Q
CL
cc
w
Y
w °
W �
U
m m
U E o
w m
O m °
(L h
a
cn
O
U
N
U
N
O
^L
I..L
- --
Z
Q
J
IL
o
o
Z
W
1
z
o
a
O
J
.E
W
>
t Z
W
V
w
• �
T
T
I �
• V
Q
w
a
Y
Z
a
a
o Y
w w
fie
z 9i U
g u O
w O ~
z
z J z >
0 a 7
U r U
w
a Z
O
u
Z
0
H
o U
w
Y Z
r_Rt�Kr M O
_ Q
z
H
• � w
Z
O
G: o,
U m
� o
J O
a w
Z
0
0 w
w_ Z
ik
J
O
J
N
C7 r U Q
_Z v p U
w
< Z, Z U
N 00 O Z
d
Olk 0
m ma. m u�
lz
m
Z_
N
m
J
Z Y
Q
W
•
Lu Q
4
•
Z Z W.. ��. r r
0 0- 0 AU
z Z � •
F 009 � 4� • � CL
O H p r r s r r
to 0 ; • • • • 0 •
4 Z W • • •
Off.
w �,• • r •
a O� Q pP0
V)
`L
ment 5
z
0
V
w
m
U
Z
H
Z
Q
fA
Q
Z Z tae
0 a UJ
IxU
V) G
74
10"
no �!,
d
sL9
g
lD
5
U
Z
¢
O
O
V
z
0
a
c�
z
D
z
a
i
y J�
4.
�G
}
Q
3 t
U
z
¢
O
c�
O
Q
w
z
O
N v
r
vv�i M
w r
Z ' 4"I
Q
U
r
C
ii
•
r
r
•
•
a®
U
Oa4
OS u'}
CL
z
<W
G
z
O
z
w
Q
H
J
Q
Q'
Q
Z
% r •r
r •.r
r`
s
,oSJP
Sas
�O
Q
W
Y
m
O
_Z
O
Q
F-
In
w
lz
m
J }
Q W
Z Y
O Q
W oC
QY Q
l�l
hment
0
U
a
O
.-1
C
U
L
X
W
H
2
U
z
w
z
a
H
z
o
z
L
O
O
J
g
Q
M
U-
3
25
ag
aN
LU > 0
U
", g
FD
Q
Zo
ZU
0-0
0,
N
r,
>
u
w
o°
o In
¢ m
°
a
ma
m
s
I
i
% r •r
r •.r
r`
s
,oSJP
Sas
�O
Q
W
Y
m
O
_Z
O
Q
F-
In
w
lz
m
J }
Q W
Z Y
O Q
W oC
QY Q
l�l
hment
0
U
a
O
.-1
C
U
L
X
W
H
2
U
z
w
z
a
H
•
457
{fj f 0
8.1.4. SP -2, San Luis Ranch (Dalidio) Specific Plan Area
Location: This specific plan area is located in the southwest quarter of the city at the corner of Madonna
Road and Dalidio Drive. The site is approximately 132 acres and is currently used for agricultural
purposes. The site is primarily flat topographically. The entire site is within the City's Planning
Area, but is outside the current city limits.
Purpose: This project site should be developed as a mixed use project that maintains the agricultural
heritage of the site, provides a commercial / office transition to the existing commercial center
to the north, and provides a diverse housing experience. Protection of the adjacent creek and a
well - planned integration into the existing circulation system will be required.
The specific plan for this area should consider and address the following land use and design
issues.
a. Provide land and appropriate financial support for development of a Prado Road connection.
Appropriate land to support road infrastructure identified in the Final Project EIR (overpass
or interchange) at this location shall be dedicated as part of any proposal and any area in
excess of the project's fair share of this facility shall not be included as part of the project
site area used to calculate the required 50% open space.
b. Circulation connections to integrate property with surrounding circulation network for all
modes of travel.
c. Connection to Froom Ranch and Calle Joaquin, if proposed, shall not bifurcate on- site or
neighboring agricultural lands. Any connection to Calle Joaquin shall be principally a
secondary/ emergency access by design.
d. Development shall include a transit hub. Developer shall work with transit officials to
provide express connections to Downtown area.
e. Maintain agricultural views along Highway 101 by maintaining active agricultural uses on the
site, and maintain viewshed of Bishop Peak and Cerro San Luis.
f. Maintain significant agricultural and open space resources on site (see Policy 1.13.8.13). Land
dedicated to Agriculture shall be of size, location and configuration appropriate to maintain
a viable, working agricultural operation.
g. Where buffering or transitions to agricultural uses are needed to support viability of the
agricultural use, these shall be provided on lands not counted towards the minimum size for
the agriculture / open space component. Provide appropriate transition to agricultural uses
on -site.
h. Integrate agricultural open space with adjacent SLO City Farm and development on
property.
It i. Site should include walkable retail and pedestrian and bicycle connections to surrounding
commercial and residential areas.
Commercial and office uses shall have parking placed behind and to side of buildings so as to
not be a prominent feature.
k. Neighborhood Commercial uses for proposed residential development shall be provided.
Page 1 -87
r a
�y 3
c� 6
m
B
w� 3
ro
� ; e
N
M � V Up6
5 p
1�
C d
a�
�Q
ILI
F
r1Y
-! o4 ow O �
Vy
U
� o
O�'
0.-a l
0
CA
X v
ro
� ; e
N
M � V Up6
5 p
1�
C d
a�
�Q
ILI
F
r1Y
-! o4 ow O �
Vy
U
� o
O�'
0.-a l
.2E
.8..'
.2 of
y
41
e
ia
A H 11
1.0
Jill,
H
E
ji—VIS
o
111
.-
�o —0
00
0 A
2
od
lam
09
.1 1 U�b 31
77
4)
CD
ll'-� r �'
4 1 1 L
A
N
Ry
2 E
.2, t'
OE
r lk
7F
kt Oj
4-1
Ewa-
HR
Old,
ID
-
z-
�Jl
JL_
Attachment a
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
PAVEMENT AREAS
NOTE: State highways, county roads, private
streets, and railroads are not included in the
City's pavement management program.
c
U
city of
san luis owspo
AL