Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-19-2016 Item 01 Consideration of a Keg Registration Program Meeting Date: 4/19/2016 FROM: Deanne Cantrell, Chief of Police Prepared By: Christine Wallace, Neighborhood Outreach Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A KEG REGISTRATION PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends to not move forward with a municipal keg registration program and to focus continuing efforts on outreach and enforcement. REPORT-IN-BRIEF The Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Report contained a recommendation to research the possibility of implementing a keg registration program. This Civility recommendation under Objective Four: Review enforcement best practices, was assigned to the City of San Luis Obispo. The State of California Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) has an existing keg registration program that manages all sales of kegged beer. Various local agencies provide education to underage residents and law enforcement provides enforcement of the ABC regulations and nuisance order crimes in the City. Any program developed by the City of San Luis Obispo would include some redundancy of effort already captured by ABC. DISCUSSION Background On May 19, 2015 Council received the Neighborhood Wellness Community Civility Report which detailed six (6) objectives:  Define short-term actions to enhance the quality of life  Define stakeholders’ needs and success  Identify university/city best practices  Review enforcement best practices  Engage stakeholders: review current educational and information efforts ˜ Prepare for sustained engagement to achieve desired vision and goal The Neighborhood Wellness Community Working Group worked to present recommendations associated with the objective that would support the vision and goal of enhancing the quality of 1 Packet Pg. 8 life for all residents (Attachment A.) On December 1, 2015 Council received an update on the City led tasks as identified by the Working Group. Many of the recommended actions or tasks outlined in the Civility Report had been completed or are in the process of implementation (Attachment B.) Staff indicated two recommendations that would be researched and brought back to Council the following calendar year. The Neighborhood Wellness Community Civility Report, Objective Four: Review Enforcement Best Practices acknowledges that both Cal Poly and the City of San Luis Obispo have engaged in many programs to address quality of life and neighborhood wellness. Both organizations have expanded staff dedicated to neighborhood wellness, implemented new programs to address nuisance order and Council has amended ordinances, such as Unruly Gathering, to give the Police Department enhanced tools for enforcement. Listed under Objective Four was the following recommendation: Action: Implement a keg registration program Desired outcome: A reduction in underage alcohol use and an accountability mechanism for persons who serve minors Keg Registration Keg registration is a tool that many states use to identify the individual purchasing a keg of beer. 29 states and the District of Columbia currently have laws that mandate purchaser registration of some kind. In California, ABC provides oversight and enforcement of keg registration. By definition, a keg is a barrel having the capacity of 30 gallons. This size however, is not sold in California. The half barrel which is most commonly purchased in the state, contains 15.5 gallons and dispenses approximately 165 twelve ounce servings. The quarter barrel, known as a pony keg, contains 7.75 gallons. Division 9 and Chapter 16 of the Business and Professions Code (B&P) of the State of California details the regulatory provisions for the distribution, sale and purchase of alcohol. Section 25659.5 details the retail regulations for the sale of kegged beer: Section 25659.5. (a) Retail licensees selling keg beer for consumption off licensed premises shall place an identification tag on all kegs of beer at the time of sale and shall require the signing of a receipt for the keg of beer by the purchaser in order to allow kegs to be traced if the contents are used in violation of this article. The keg identification shall be in the form of a numbered label prescribed and supplied by the department that identifies the seller. The receipt shall be on a form prescribed and supplied by the department and shall include the name and address of the purchaser and the purchaser's driver's license number or equivalent form of identification number. A retailer shall not return any deposit upon the return of any keg that does not have the identification label required 1 Packet Pg. 9 pursuant to subdivision (a). (b) Any licensee selling keg beer for off premise consumption who fails to require the signing of a receipt at the time of sale and fails to place a numbered identification label on the keg shall be subject to disciplinary action pursuant to this division. The licensee shall retain a copy of the receipt, which shall be retained on the licensed premise for a period of six months. The receipt records shall be available for inspection and copying by the department or other authorized law enforcement agency. (c) Possession of a keg containing beer with knowledge that the keg is not identified as required by subdivision (a) is a misdemeanor. (d) Any purchaser of keg beer who knowingly provides false information as required by subdivision (a) is guilty of a misdemeanor. (e) The identification label required pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be constructed of material and made attachable in such a manner as to make the label easily removable for the purpose of cleaning and reusing the keg by a beer manufacturer. (f) The department is authorized to charge a fee not to exceed the actual cost of supplying receipt forms and identification labels required pursuant to subdivision (a). Fees collected pursuant to this subdivision shall be deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund. (g) As used in this section, "keg" means any brewery-sealed, individual container of beer having a liquid capacity of six gallons or more. ABC provides the keg tags and log books to each retailer who sells kegged beer. Most retailers are only selling the contents of the keg, not the vessel, and require the purchaser to pay a deposit for the keg itself which is then returned to the purchaser when the keg is brought back. Each keg tag has a number which is logged with the purchasers’ name, address, driver’s license number, and date of issue (Attachment C). This information can be obtained by any sworn law enforcement officer from a retailer. 1 Packet Pg. 10 There is no state or national data to show keg registration laws have made an impact on underage consumption. There is some research that has been conducted showing states that have more strict alcohol policies have lower underage consumption rates (example: keg registration, social host laws and suspended driving privileges), but the policies are not well studied and have little or no evidence to support effectiveness (Child Trends, September 2014.) In conversations with the manager of the San Luis Obispo BevMo located on Los Osos Valley Road, he stated that “since the laws changed” [noise and unruly gathering] he doesn’t sell as many kegs to college age individuals. In further discussion he stated the majority of the BevMo sales were going to wedding receptions, keg refrigerators (“kegerators”) and milestone birthday parties for older adults. The manager also indicated BevMo sells an average of 10 kegs per week with the purchaser, on average, being 40 years of age. Outreach to Campus Bottle, 290 California and Cork n’ Bottle, 774 Foothill provided similar 1 Packet Pg. 11 information. Campus Bottle is averaging a sale of 15 kegs per week and Cork n’ Bottle sells an average of 10 per week. The manager of Cork n’ Bottle stated that ¾ of their “cheap beer” keg sales are to college age individuals and ¼ is “good beer” sales to individuals with kegerators or for weddings and celebrations. Both owners stated that the price of kegs has increased over the years and during the summer months, keg purchases are almost non-existent to the student age population. Since San Luis Obispo is a destination location for weddings and special events, there continues to be a market for keg purchases; however, this is typically not the target demographic as it relates to quality of life issues in the neighborhoods or addressed as part of the Civility report. Current Trends Staff obtained data via a survey sent out to students of Cal Poly and Cuesta College with the following questions asked: 1. Have you ever attended an off-campus social gathering where keg beer was served? 2. Have you ever hosted a social gathering where keg beer was provided? 3. Have you ever purchased a keg of beer for a social gathering? “Social gathering” for purposes of the survey was defined as follows: birthday parties, theme parties (i.e. Halloween), club gatherings, Greek events, athletic team gatherings, religious study groups and group video gaming. 1,451 responses were received and the table below indicates answers to the survey question. Yes No I don’t know No response Question 1 915 347 27 162 Question 2 414 872 0 165 Question 3 287 1001 0 163 Of the responses to Question 1, 70.99% of respondents indicated they had attended one or more social gathering where keg beer was present. While the survey indicates kegs are being purchased and are being used at social gatherings, the patrol staff of SLOPD indicates keg beer is the least common form of alcohol found at noisy party complaints. Additionally, if keg beer is present, other ordinances are in place to deal with individual open container or underage drinking violations. Enforcement ABC enforces the state keg registration and other alcohol related laws. ABC also has a division called TRACE (Target Responsibility for Alcohol Connected Emergencies) that is focused enforcement by ABC investigators to determine where alcohol was acquired, purchased or served. Should a significant alcohol related crime take place, whether involving a keg or other 1 Packet Pg. 12 form of dispensed alcohol, TRACE would be a resource to the police department to investigate the matter further. Additionally, ABC along with local law enforcement conducts periodic Minor Decoy and Shoulder Tap operations to deter the furnishing of alcohol to minors. The 4th Amendment of the Constitution is very clear providing the legal standards necessary for law enforcement to enter private property for the purposes of conducting a search and seizure of property. Police must have consent of the owner or be presented with exigent circumstances to enter or possess a warrant issued by a judge allowing entry. In the instance of a party on private property that may have a keg, unless any of the standards above were met, police officers would not have access to the keg. The significance of the offense would merit the determination of either exigency or the issuance of a warrant; however, low level alcohol related crimes or offenses associate with quality of life issues typically do not rise to this need or standard. Nonetheless, there are several existing laws which have been useful tools for law enforcement.  Social Host Ordinance MC 9.05.010 passed by council in 2009, disallows any person to host a gathering where underage people are possessing and/or consuming alcoholic beverages. A violation of this ordinance is a misdemeanor.  Unruly Gathering Ordinance MC 9.13.030, passed by Council in 2010 and amended in 2015, disallows the hosting or participation in a gathering deemed unruly.  Minor in Possession (MIP) Business & Professions Code 25662 prohibits individuals under the age of 21 from possessing alcoholic beverages, is a misdemeanor and goes on the individual’s permanent record. In addition, Vehicle Code 13202.5 provides that an MIP conviction results also in a one-year suspension of the minor’s driver’s license or a one-year delay in the opportunity to obtain a license if not yet a licensee.  Possession of Open Containers or Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages MC 9.04 prohibits the possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages by individuals of legal age in public spaces. In addition to these enforcement tools, SLO County Drug and Alcohol Services, Cal Poly Health Services and Cal Poly Dean of Students Office provide excellent education for the student age population of San Luis Obispo. The Student Community Success Program which launched in 2014, is mandatory for Cal Poly students who have off-campus alcohol violations (open container, MIP, DUI, etc.) The program educates students on how their choices are not only detrimental to their health and safety but also how it can negatively affect their neighborhood and community. Cal Poly Health Services does a great deal of campus outreach to educate and encourage students to make healthy decisions. New Student Orientation programs also focus on healthy decision making and the Aware Awake Alive program helps educate students on how to help friends and roommates should individuals over-consume. A keg registration process is already in place under the oversight of ABC. The San Luis Obispo Police Department has access to keg purchaser information should it become material as part of an investigation. The net value of what a keg registration program will achieve in the form of reducing underage drinking, excessive alcohol consumption or other associate crimes and quality 1 Packet Pg. 13 of life issues does not present a valued use of existing resources, time or expense. Staff recommends Council not move forward with a municipal keg registration program and maintain focus on continuous outreach and education while also enforcing existing regulations. CONCURRENCES The Finance and IT Department and City Attorney concur with the recommendations in this report. FISCAL IMPACT Creating a keg registration program would have a significant impact on existing staff resources to implement, monitor and continuously operate. There would be associated expenses with clerical and administration costs to fully support a program. ALTERNATIVES 1. Direct staff to return to Council with options for a local keg registration program and financing options. 1 Packet Pg. 14 May 12, 2015 The Honorable Jan Marx Mayor City of San Luis Obispo 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Dr. Gil Stork Superintendent/President Cuesta College Highway 1 San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 Dr. Jeffrey D. Armstrong President Cal Poly State University 1 Grand Avenue San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 Dear Mayor Marx, Drs. Stork and Armstrong: On behalf of the Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort working group, we are pleased to present our final report for acceptance. The report contained with this letter is the result of 18 months of collaboration and discussions among residents, students, university and college staff, and City leadership. The action plans and timelines for implementation contained within this report are the result of a consensus agreement by all members of the working group, and these actions will result in improved neighborhood wellness in San Luis Obispo. All groups are ready to begin implementation, upon acceptance of this report. We welcome your suggestions to the report’s action items. The Student Community Liaison Committee is the body identified in this process to consider modifications during their oversight of this plan’s implementation. Thank you for the opportunity to serve the San Luis Obispo community! Sincerely, Keith B. Humphrey, Ph.D. Sandee L. McLaughlin Vice President for Student Affairs Vice President for Student Services & College Centers Cal Poly Cuesta College Enc. 1.a Packet Pg. 15 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) San Luis Obispo Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort FINAL REPORT Spring 2015 - Enhancing the quality of life for all residents - 1.a Packet Pg. 16 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................. 3 PROCESS ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 OBJECTIVE ONE: Define short-term actions to enhance the quality of life .............................................. 5 OBJECTIVE TWO: Define stakeholders’ needs and success ....................................................................... 7 OBJECTIVE THREE: Identify university/city best practices ................................................................... 10 OBJECTIVE FOUR: Review enforcement best practices .......................................................................... 17 OBJECTIVE FIVE: Engage stakeholders: review current educational & information efforts .................. 23 OBJECTIVE SIX: Prepare for sustained engagement to achieve desired vision & goal ............................ 25 APPENDIX A: Working Group Membership ........................................................................................... 28 APPENDIX B: Council Agenda Report .................................................................................................... 29 APPENDIX C: Full Survey Report ........................................................................................................... 54 APPENDIX D: Matrix of All Action Items .............................................................................................. 70 APPENDIX E: Post March 7 Recommendations ...................................................................................... 76 APPENDIX F: Maintaining Balanced Neighborhoods Report .................................................................. 79 1.a Packet Pg. 17 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 3 OVERVIEW ith the focus of making San Luis Obispo an even more vibrant community for residents and students to reside in, community representatives, Cal Poly and Cuesta College administrators, students and San Luis Obispo city staff have worked side by side to coordinate their efforts through the Neighborhood Wellness/ Community Civility Effort. The effort was launched in May of 2013 with the support of the San Luis Obispo City Council, Cal Poly President Jeffrey Armstrong, and Cuesta College President/Superintendent Gil Stork. This initiative aimed to discuss the changing culture of neighborhoods in San Luis Obispo resulting from the shifts of owner-occupied households to the increase in rental units, specifically by student-aged individuals. Collectively, the working group has a vision of building “a community in which year-round residents and students actively collaborate to build community and communicate in an environment that fosters mutual respect and understanding.” The unified goal of the working group has been to develop ideas for stakeholder consideration that are intended to “enhance the quality of life for all residents.” The group responded to the six objectives created by the San Luis Obispo City Council with subsequent recommendations, desired outcomes, implementation leads and partners, and timelines for implementation. The objectives are outlined below, and each is addressed thoroughly in this report. Define short-term actions to enhance the quality of life Define stakeholders’ needs and success Identify university/city best practices Review enforcement best practices Engage stakeholders: review current educational and information efforts Prepare for sustained engagement to achieve desired vision and goal W From the recommendations above and active collaboration within the working group, three overall themes emerged: Increase communications from Cal Poly and Cuesta College Develop responses through solution-oriented initiatives Set in motion proactive measures to avoid repeating past mistakes and preventing new problems from occurring 1.a Packet Pg. 18 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 4 PROCESS Beginning work in October of 2013, the Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort working group conducted a thoughtful study of the objectives outlined by the San Luis Obispo City Council and created a process to efficiently move the community into action. Champions were assigned to each objective, and the subsequent 13 meetings, hosted by Cuesta College, were devoted to discussions of the objectives, led by the champions. Champions for the objectives are presented below: Note: Names in parentheses denote past working group members. During the robust discussions for each objective the entire working group offered feedback on the work of the champions and direction on how to proceed. Each group returned to conduct further studies based on the feedback and direction of this group. The champions provided recommendations to the working group in late 2014. Each of the recommendations were discussed and affirmed during the monthly meetings, which focused specifically on one particular objective. It is those recommendations that are presented in this report. OBJECTIVE ONE: Karen Adler, Julie Towery OBJECTIVE TWO: Katie Lichtig, Joi Sullivan (Jason Colombini), Dr. Anthony Gutierrez, Juventino Ortiz OBJECTIVE THREE: Derek Johnson, Stephanie Teaford (Justin Wellner, Betsy Kinsley) OBJECTIVE FOUR: Joe Arteaga, Steve Gesell, George Hughes, Chris Staley, Brenda Trobaugh OBJECTIVE FIVE: Scott Chedester (Charles Scovell), Dr. Anthony Gutierrez, Kimberly Hampton, Joi Sullivan (Jason Colombini), Christine Wallace OBJECTIVE SIX: Dr. Keith Humphrey, Sandee McLaughlin 1.a Packet Pg. 19 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 5 Goal To define short-term actions that could be implemented to enhance the quality of life for all residents, particularly associated in the timeframe around the start of Cal Poly’s fall term. OBJECTIVE ONE: Define short-term actions to enhance the quality of life Champions Karen Adler, Community Julie Towery, Community Background Historically, there has been an increase in calls for service around the neighborhood areas adjacent to Cal Poly coinciding with start of the school year. This objective is set to define what short-term actions could lead to positive long-term effects during that timeframe. Short-term actions are also distributed among all objectives, thus are not exclusive to objective one. Recommendations Schedule regular neighborhood tours with city council, mayor, neighbors, Cal Poly and Cuesta College leaders, etc. Investigate establishing Student Nighttime Auxiliary Patrol (S.N.A.P.) Ride-Along program and promote current Police Ride Along program Explore the option of creating a noise ordinance in public spaces on streets and sidewalks for gatherings of more than 50 people by issuing citations or other alternative options Consider expanding tools to enforce ordinances for nuisance properties including, but not limited to, “tagging” properties that meet a definition of a public nuisance or unruly gatherings in terms of both property-maintenance concerns and behavior issues Evaluate policies so that new development or redevelopment does not unduly impact neighborhoods 1.a Packet Pg. 20 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 6 Actions Desired Outcomes Implementation Leads & Partners Timeline for Implementation Schedule regular neighborhood tours with city council, mayor, neighbors, Cal Poly and Cuesta leaders, etc. Allow neighbors to point out neighborhood issues Cal Poly Ongoing, began Summer of 2014 Investigate establishing S.N.A.P. Ride-Along program and promote current Police Ride Along program Increase the amount of support to assist with complaints and allow officers to do other police work City of San Luis Obispo Fall 2015 Explore the option of creating a noise ordinance in public spaces on streets and sidewalks for gatherings of more than 50 people by issuing citations or other alternative options Decrease number of noise complaints City of San Luis Obispo Spring 2016 Consider expanding tools to enforce ordinances for nuisance properties including, but not limited to, “tagging” properties that meet a definition of a public nuisance or unruly gatherings in terms of both property- maintenance concerns and behavior issues Hold repeat noise violators accountable City of San Luis Obispo Spring 2016 Evaluate policies so that new development or redevelopment does not unduly impact neighborhoods. Decrease properties that allow for high occupancy City of San Luis Obispo Fall 2016 1.a Packet Pg. 21 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 7 OBJECTIVE TWO: Define stakeholders’ needs and success Champions Dr. Anthony Gutierrez, Cuesta College Katie Lichtig, City of San Luis Obispo Juventino Ortiz, Community Joi Sullivan (Jason Colombini), Cal Poly Goal For Cal Poly, Cuesta College and the City of San Luis Obispo to use the results of the community-wide survey to suggest efforts for implementation to address community-defined issues. Background The purpose of this objective is to identify the stakeholders’ needs and suggest solutions so that the outcomes reflect a desired environment for the community. To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the community’s needs and what success looked like, a communitywide survey was mailed in May of 2014. A total of 3, 774 surveys were completed and returned, physically and electronically. Of the completed surveys, 1,706 were from non- student residents, 1,783 were from individuals identifying themselves as either Cal Poly or Cuesta students, and 318 individuals did not associate themselves with any group. The full survey results and discussion is offered in Appendix C. Recommendations The assessment results provided a clearer picture of the stakeholder perceptions, which helped develop potential recommendations, such as: Evaluate best practices and implement strategies to reduce the number of disruptions from parties and noise in neighborhoods (as referenced in Objective Three) Develop and implement a rental housing inspection program Implement a range of strategies to change the relationship and culture between students and non-students in neighborhoods Explore and implement strategies to address the concentration of bars in the downtown area and related safety issues. Consider using strategies identified in the Land Use and Circulation Element (LUCE) update to achieve this objective Implement educational programs to increase the number of student-aged residents who bring in their trashcans on the same day the trash is picked up Implement strategies to reduce traffic issues in neighborhoods. Consider using strategies identified in the Land Use and Circulation Element update to achieve this objective 1.a Packet Pg. 22 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 8 Continue to implement strategies to address homelessness in San Luis Obispo (particularly in the downtown area) Actions Desired Outcomes Implementation Leads & Partners Timeline for Implementation Evaluate best practices and implement strategies to reduce the number of disruptions from parties and noise in neighborhoods (as referenced in Objective Three) Reduce noise disruptions Cal Poly and Cuesta College (programmatic) City of San Luis Obispo (enforcement) Fall 2015 Develop and implement a rental housing inspection program Insure that rental units comply with required minimum health and safety standards City of San Luis Obispo Fall 2016 Implement a range of strategies to change the relationship and culture between students and non-students in neighborhoods (no specific recommendations discerned from the survey results) Improve student and community relationships Cal Poly Associated Student, Inc. (ASI) and Associate Students for Cuesta College (ASCC) Spring 2016 Explore and implement strategies to address the concentration of bars in the downtown area and related safety issues. Consider using strategies identified in the Land Use and Circulation Element update to achieve this objective Address and decrease safety-related issues City of San Luis Obispo Ongoing per LUCE strategies Implement educational programs to increase the number of student-aged residents who bring in their trashcans on the same day the trash is picked up Increase the number of student-age residents to comply with the 24-hour ordinance City of San Luis Obispo Ongoing Continue to implement strategies to address homelessness in San Luis Obispo (particularly in the downtown area) A reduction in the impacts of homelessness on the community City of San Luis Obispo Ongoing 1.a Packet Pg. 23 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 9 Implement strategies to reduce traffic issues in neighborhoods. Consider using strategies identified in the Land Use and Circulation Element update to achieve this objective Reduce traffic-related issues in neighborhoods City of San Luis Obispo Ongoing 1.a Packet Pg. 24 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 10 OBJECTIVE THREE: Identify university/city best practices Champions Derek Johnson, City of San Luis Obispo Stephanie Teaford (Betsy Kinsley, Justin Wellner), Cal Poly Goal To identify best practices that can be undertaken by Cal Poly, in collaboration with the City of San Luis Obispo, to enhance positive interactions between students and permanent residents. Background Universities and colleges across the nation impact the communities in which they exist in both positive and negative ways. The impact of students in residential neighborhoods has prompted higher education institutions to share best practices that can lead to improvements in community relationships and mitigate negative impacts. The objective explored various programs and efforts undertaken by universities and colleges nationwide. The following recommendations could provide a framework for improving relations between student residents and permanent residents of San Luis Obispo. 1.a Packet Pg. 25 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 11 Recommendations To address student rental properties Create and implement a transition to Off-Campus Living Education Program, to be shared with Cuesta College’s Student Life Office Include expectations and responsibilities of living in neighborhoods in the City of San Luis Obispo (e.g. local ordinances) The successful completion of a culminating test will result in a Preferred Renter Certification with potential benefits offered by landlords Work with the city to generate a neighborhood map of housing rental properties and provide outreach to student renters by funding welcome bags for neighbors to distribute to establish positive interactions (University of Colorado, Boulder) Create a Renter/Rental Housing Inspection Program. Students and landlords can work together for preferred renter/rental designation o Beautification Program: “Door Decal” or “Golden Arrow” for upkeep of property and meeting standards for appearance and safety o Student Affairs Awards: Awarded yearly to no-complaint housing (LaSalle University) o Preferred rental properties listed with the city o Request the release of judicial information to off campus entities (Plymouth State University) 1.a Packet Pg. 26 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 12 To alleviate nighttime noise and to build compassion and understanding Develop outreach and marketing efforts toward students (University of Massachusetts, Amherst) Implement a Party Registration Program. Develop a program to incentivize party registration that provides the opportunity for the San Luis Obispo Police Department to contact the party registrant and offer a 20-minute warning before dispatching S.N.A.P. or a police officer. This provides the students a way to minimize impacts on enforcement resources (University of Colorado, Boulder) Initiate Dialog Dinners or Block Parties for students and residents to talk about what they like most about their neighborhoods (University of Colorado, Boulder) Promote the principles of the The Mustang Way in neighborhoods: o Student Neighborhood Liaisons: Block parties/events for networking. (University of Minnesota, Twin Cities & Towson University) o Neighborhood Helping Hands: Volunteerism for neighbor assistance (e.g. fruit picking, ladder needs, barn raising, etc.). Coordinate with campus departments to provide Learn by Doing experiences within neighborhoods for senior projects and other work-related majors such as horticulture, landscape architecture, construction management and others. o Peer-to-peer engagement for neighborhood policing; “Walk this Way Program” (University of Massachusetts, Amherst) 1.a Packet Pg. 27 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 13 To improve collaboration and understanding among students, non-students and city groups, and to increase engagement in problem solving Continue to engage and communicate collaboratively among students, non-students and city groups. See Student Community Liaison Committee (SCLC), below. Utilize various on-campus departments and offices that support living off-campus (Off- Campus Student Life; Cuesta College Student Life and Leadership; Student & Community Relations; Office of Neighborhood Life; Student Neighborhood Relations; Neighborhood University Relations and Neighbors; and Student Life and Leadership at Cuesta College) to: o Support all students, non-students, and permanent residents in the communities surrounding Cal Poly o Educate students about university policies and local ordinances o Continue to build and strengthen neighborhood relations by facilitating dialogue o Promote civic citizenship to create a positive quality of life for everyone living in the neighborhoods (Georgetown University) o Specific communications and strategies could include: A 100 percent response policy for any time, any issue, by enforcing a prompt and meaningful response The police provide a blueprint that lets students and neighbors know exactly what to expect when a community concern is registered with the university The policy will establish a standard for reporting an incident (through a university helpline); clear steps that would be taken for follow-up with the student (through an updated sanction chart) and community members; and what data would be collected to create a metric to evaluate student success and outcomes (Georgetown University) Sustained conflict resolution services such as “SLO Solutions,” a jointly sponsored citywide conflict-resolution program specifically designed to address student-neighbor issues and provide a means for constructive resolution. Since 2004, this program has used the services of Creative Mediation to resolve a variety of community disputes at no cost to those seeking mediation Sustained SCLC effort. For more than 20 years, Cal Poly’s Associated Students, Inc. (ASI), Associated Students of Cuesta College (ASCC), and the city have served as leaders on the committee. It was established to further student and community communication and develop positive relationships 1.a Packet Pg. 28 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 14 Neighborhood Concerns Phone Line: Neighbors can call in with concerns. Cal Poly and Cuesta College staff can recommend actions and contact students (Colorado University, Boulder) Quarterly walkabouts and coffee sessions with city residents and representatives from Cal Poly, Cuesta College and the city One-hour walkabouts will be scheduled, every third month and will take place at various times throughout the neighborhoods surrounding the campus. During these walks they will explore student housing rentals, party atmosphere, traffic impacts and Greek housing One-hour coffee sessions or “listening sessions” will be scheduled every third month, in the afternoon, at a local venue to discuss such topics as the Cal Poly Master Plan and vision for the future, diversity and inclusivity, students in the community, and year- end accomplishments and challenges Develop proactive engagement of law and code enforcement with visits to properties of concern; “Knock and Talk” (University of Maryland). Implement a Joint Letter Program. Police contact with students in off-campus housing who generates letters signed by the university, police and city that outlines expectations. It is sent to the resident and landlord (University of Oregon) o Tagging for repeat offending or problem properties 1.a Packet Pg. 29 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 15 Actions Desired Outcomes Implementation Leads & Partners Timeline for Implementation Create and implement a transition to Off-Campus Living Education Program, to be shared with Cuesta College’s Student Life Office Set expectations and responsibilities for students living in neighborhoods in the City of San Luis Obispo Cal Poly Summer 2015 Work with the city to generate a neighborhood map of housing rental properties and provide outreach to student renters by funding welcome bags for neighbors to distribute to establish positive interactions Establish positive interaction with City Cal Poly ASI , ASCC, City of San Luis Obispo Spring 2016 Create a Renter/Rental Housing Inspection Program Rental properties that meet minimum health and safety standards Cal Poly, City of San Luis Obispo Spring 2016 Develop outreach and marketing efforts toward students Raise awareness of the impacts of noise on neighborhood Cal Poly Spring 2016 Implement a Party Registration Program. Develop a program to incentivize party registration that provides the opportunity for the San Luis Obispo Police Department to contact the party registrant and offer a 20- minute warning before dispatching S.N.A.P. or a police officer Fewer noise citations City of San Luis Obispo Spring 2016 Initiate Dialog Dinners or Block Parties for students and residents to talk about what they like most about their neighborhoods Create positive interactions between students and year- round residents Cal Poly ASI, ASCC Ongoing Promote the principles of the The Mustang Way in neighborhoods Enhance a positive culture of peer-to-peer accountability in neighborhoods Cal Poly ASI Ongoing 1.a Packet Pg. 30 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 16 Continue to engage and communicate collaboratively among students, non-students and city groups Improve collaboration and understanding among students, non- students and city groups SCLC Ongoing Utilize various on-campus departments and offices that support living off-campus to support students, non- students and permanent residents living in neighborhoods. Educate students about university policies and ordinances, strengthen neighborhood relations by facilitating dialogs Cal Poly & Cuesta College Fall 2015 Develop proactive engagement of law and code enforcement with visits to properties of concern; “Knock and Talk”. Positive engagement with law enforcement and decrease repeat offending properties City of San Luis Obispo Ongoing Implement a Joint Letter Program. Police contact with students in off-campus housing generates letter signed by university, police and city that outlines expectations sent to resident and landlord Cal Poly Fall 2015 1.a Packet Pg. 31 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 17 Goal That Cal Poly, Cuesta College and the City of San Luis Obispo police departments consider implementing strategies to address community civility and quality-of-life matters. OBJECTIVE FOUR: Review enforcement best practices Champions Joe Arteaga, Cuesta College Steve Gesell, City of San Luis Obispo George Hughes, Cal Poly Chris Staley, City of San Luis Obispo Brenda Trobaugh, Cal Poly 1.a Packet Pg. 32 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 18 Background In the past several years, both Cal Poly and the City of San Luis Obispo have engaged in numerous programs to address quality of life and community wellness. Both organizations have expanded professional staff dedicated to neighborhood wellness, created and modified ordinances, and implemented new programs to address pubic disorder and nuisance crimes including but not limited to: Amendments to the noise ordinance In 2010 the San Luis Obispo Police Department made recommendations to the city council regarding changes to the existing noise ordinance to improve noise reduction efforts. The modifications included reducing the number of allowable warnings to one every six months and to hold residential property owners responsible for repeat noise violations. Many landlords have since added language to their lease and rental agreements with penalties levied to their tenants who receive noise violations. These modifications were accepted by city council and noise complaints were significantly reduced by 30 percent for the following year and have been maintained since (see Table 1 below). Table 1: Total noise party violations reported from 2009 to 2014. 200920102011201220132014 Noise Violations 258422382013164416721729 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Noise Party Violations 1.a Packet Pg. 33 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 19 Unruly Gathering Ordinance In 2010 the San Luis Obispo Police Department conducted research on Unruly Gathering Ordinances. After extensive research and outreach to the community and Cal Poly, an Unruly Gathering Ordinance was proposed and accepted by the city council. The ordinance was intended to prevent substantial disturbances on private property in a neighborhood. This included unlawful and disruptive behavior by large groups of people. On April 6, 2010, the city council adopted section SLMC 9.13.030 Prohibition of Unruly Gatherings. A violation of the Unruly Gathering Ordinance consists of hosting a gathering on private property that: Involves 20 people or more; and Involves unlawful conduct that creates a substantial disturbance in a significant segment of a neighborhood. “Unlawful conduct that results in a substantial disturbance can include such things as excessive noise, public drunkenness, serving alcohol to minors, fighting, urinating in public, crowds overflowing into yards, sidewalks, or streets, or similar unlawful behaviors.” Neighborhood Officer Program The San Luis Obispo Police Department initiated its Neighborhood Officer Program on December 1, 2013. The goal of the Neighborhood Officer Program is to quickly identify community issues, concerns, problems and crime trends that have long-term quality-of-life impacts on a particular neighborhood. The Neighborhood Officer Program allows for officers to coordinate resources to help solve these problems. This model of policing is both a philosophy and an organizational strategy that allows police and community residents to work closely together in new ways to solve problems associated with crime, fear of crime, social disorder and neighborhood decay. Attainable goals of this program include: Maintain or increase public confidence in the Police Department Decrease fear of crime Listen to and address citizen concerns Bring community resources together to solve problems Impact specific crime problems Reduce repetitive calls for service Educate the public about its Police Department 1.a Packet Pg. 34 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 20 Student Community Success Program In 2013 Cal Poly hired a full-time off-campus student life coordinator to be both proactive and reactive in supporting students and neighborhood residents with neighborhood wellness initiatives. Responsibilities of the position include: Coordinate the resolution of off-campus conduct with university administration, city government and community members to find solutions for student’s problems or concerns Assist in mediating and resolving student/community conflicts Effect change in the social climate and relationships with specific responsibility of working with students and their neighbors within the local community Implement training sessions, presentations, and educational programs regarding substance abuse, civic and social responsibility One goal of the program is to create a Student Community Success Program with the mission to help students be successful off campus and address community concerns. The program is intended to change and encourage inappropriate behavior through community and student meetings, workshops, leadership panels, and peer-mentoring opportunities. Cal Poly University Police Off-Campus Patrols By authority of the California Penal Code, the University Police Department has legal authority to exercise peace officer powers within a one-mile radius of the exterior boundaries of campus (see Appendix A). In 2014 Cal Poly hired two additional police officers to expand proactive patrols within the neighborhoods directly adjacent to campus. The focus of these patrols has been to proactively discourage and enforce public disorder crimes. Recommendations City and Cal Poly officials should craft a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agreement between the city and university regarding police operational protocol Partner Cal Poly and Cuesta police officers with San Luis Obispo Neighborhood Officers to coordinate resources and achieve program goals 1.a Packet Pg. 35 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 21 City should explore additional proactive educational opportunities with Cal Poly and Cuesta College to change the student culture related to neighborhood wellness Implement a keg registration program Conduct an internal assessment of the San Luis Obispo Police Department staffing to prepare for growth within the city and on the Cal Poly campus to ensure staffing needs match the population Conduct an internal assessment of the University Police Department staffing to meet the growth on the Cal Poly campus Explore the possibility of Cal Poly Police being able to issue City Municipal Administrative Citations Location of a university police substation within the new residence hall project to coordinate law enforcement problem-solving efforts 1.a Packet Pg. 36 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 22 Actions Desired Outcomes Implementation Leads & Partners Timeline for Implementation City and Cal Poly officials to craft a Memorandum of Understanding agreement between the city and university regarding police operational protocol within a one- mile radius Allows for coordination of resources to quickly respond to community concerns Cal Poly, City of San Luis Obispo Fall 2015 Partner Cal Poly and Cuesta police officers with San Luis Obispo Neighborhood Officers to coordinate resources and achieve program goals To coordinate resources and obtain program goals City of San Luis Obispo Fall 2015 City should explore additional proactive educational opportunities with Cal Poly and Cuesta College to change the student culture related to neighborhood wellness Change student culture related to neighborhood wellness SCLC Fall 2016, and with each annual report Implement a keg registration program A reduction in underage alcohol use and an accountability mechanism for persons who serve minors City of San Luis Obispo Fall 2016 Conduct an internal assessment of the San Luis Obispo Police Department staffing to prepare for growth within the city and on the Cal Poly campus to ensure staffing needs match the population Meet the needs of the community as population grows City of San Luis Obispo Spring 2016 Conduct an internal assessment of the University Police Department staffing to meet the growth on the Cal Poly campus Meet the needs of Cal Poly as student population grows Cal Poly Spring 2016 Explore the possibility of Cal Poly Police being able to issue City Municipal Administrative Citations To be able to patrol in neighborhoods adjacent to Cal Poly campus Addressed via MOU identified above Location of a university police substation within the new residence hall project to coordinate law enforcement problem-solving efforts Coordinate law enforcement outreach and problem solving efforts Cal Poly Fall 2018 1.a Packet Pg. 37 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 23 Goal To engage stakeholders: review current educational and informational efforts. OBJECTIVE FIVE: Engage stakeholders: review current educational & information efforts Champions Scott Chedester (Charles Scovell), Cuesta College Dr. Anthony Gutierrez, Cuesta College Kimberly Hampton, Cal Poly Joi Sullivan (Jason Colombini), Cal Poly Christine Wallace, City of San Luis Obispo Background This objective examines the methods, content and effectiveness of educational efforts put forward by Cal Poly, Cuesta College, the City of San Luis Obispo, and student resident groups. The inventory of channels of communication was compiled by representatives of Cal Poly, Cuesta College, and the City of San Luis Obispo. Neighborhood wellness meeting attendees, Cal Poly and Cuesta College student focus groups were presented with the inventory. An additional student subcommittee met to discuss the effectiveness of current methods and content. Suggestions for outreach changes made during the presentations based on the content effectiveness are reflected in the recommendations of this report. Recommendations The recommendation is to collaboratively create an annual communications plan containing neighborhood wellness messages and a process for communicating the information effectively to maximize resources. The communication plan should be reassessed annually to evaluate effectiveness and to ensure resources are not duplicated or wasted. Communications plan participants could consist of representatives from Cal Poly, Cuesta College and the city. Suggestions for the Subcommittee Produce a variety of impactful electronic and print media to educate residents on property maintenance standards, with a specific focus on repeat offenders in neighborhoods 1.a Packet Pg. 38 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 24 Revive the Off-Campus Housing Guide (University of Colorado, Boulder) Produce video for new Cuesta College students to view as part of the required online orientation on “how to be a good neighbor” Produce “good neighbor” and Safety Enhancement Zone videos for www.respectslo.com (Linked to Cal Poly websites and campus television stations) Cal Poly University Housing bulletin boards made available for “good neighbor” and Safety Enhancement Zone messaging Cuesta College bulletin boards are made available for “good neighbor” and Safety Enhancement Zone messaging. Create and play radio public service announcements on KCPR Conduct annual presentations to Block P – Cal Poly Athletics Develop an information distribution plan with off-campus housing providers and property management; request Safety Enhancement and good neighbor materials be posted Housing resident assistant training to include off-campus impacts Create better avenues of communication with Greek Life house owners Produce Safety Enhancement Zone door hangers Produce banners and sandwich boards to be displayed in the Cal Poly and Cuesta College university unions about community and neighborhood wellness issues Produce table tents in Cal Poly University Union and Cuesta College cafeteria Involve off-campus housing providers (property management companies, housing complex managers) in outreach efforts Actions Desired Outcomes Implementation Leads & Partners Timeline for Implementation Create an annual communications plan containing neighborhood wellness messages and a process for communicating the information effectively to maximize resources Effectively inform the community on matters of neighborhood wellness City of San Luis Obispo Winter 2015 1.a Packet Pg. 39 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 25 Goal The purpose of objective six of the report is to ensure that the plans developed in objectives one through five are implemented, assessed, and folded into the regular operations of the appropriate agency (for ongoing efforts). Additionally, the goal is to sustain regular communications between Cal Poly, Cuesta College, the City of San Luis Obispo, residents and students. OBJECTIVE SIX: Prepare for sustained engagement to achieve desired vision & goal Champions Dr. Keith Humphrey, Cal Poly Sandee McLaughlin, Cuesta College Background Neighborhood wellness issues in San Luis Obispo have historically been fragmented within each agency by implementing its own projects, causing confusion among year-round residents, and limiting the effectiveness of each individual effort. There is a unified desire among all constituencies in San Luis Obispo to see the quality of life improve in neighborhoods, and a structure to coordinate these efforts was missing. For almost three decades, the Student- Community Liaison Committee (SCLC) has brought the students of Cal Poly and Cuesta College together with city officials and residents for communication and discussion. This forum has been valuable to all parties, as any culture change related to neighborhood wellness rests with the students. Recommendations Re-invest in the Student-Community Liaison Committee The Student-Community Liaison Committee should assess the effectiveness of each recommendation once they have been implemented Shift SCLC memberships Host an annual town hall meeting 1.a Packet Pg. 40 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 26 Actions Desired Outcomes Implementation Leads & Partners Timeline for Implementation Re-invest in the Student- Community Liaison Committee Become the coordinating body responsible for monitoring the recommendations, once adopted by the city council, Cal Poly and Cuesta College SCLC Fall 2015, ongoing The Student-Community Liaison Committee should assess the effectiveness of each recommendation once they have been implemented Recommend the appropriate changes, and produce an annual report on the state of neighborhood wellness in the City of San Luis Obispo SCLC Ongoing Shift SCLC memberships SCLC memberships should be reevaluated to directly involve those individuals (by their position) most directly involved in neighborhood wellness SCLC Spring 2016 Host an annual town hall meeting Present their report to the community, receive feedback and suggestions from the broader San Luis Obispo community SCLC Spring 2016, ongoing 1.a Packet Pg. 41 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 27 1.a Packet Pg. 42 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Appendix A: Working Group Membership Page 28 APPENDIX A: Working Group Membership Dr. Keith Humphrey, Co-Chair Cal Poly Sandee McLaughlin, Co-Chair Cuesta College Karen Adler Community Joe Arteaga Cuesta College Scott Chedester (Charles Scovell) Cuesta College Steve Gesell City of San Luis Obispo Dr. Anthony Gutierrez Cuesta College George Hughes Cal Poly Kimberly Hampton Cal Poly Derek Johnson City of San Luis Obispo Katie Lichtig City of San Luis Obispo Juventino Ortiz Community Chris Staley City of San Luis Obispo Joi Sullivan (Jason Colombini) Cal Poly Stephanie Teaford (Betsy Kinsley, Justin Wellner) Cal Poly Julie Towery Community Brenda Trobaugh Cal Poly Christine Wallace City of San Luis Obispo Sharon Spatafora, Administrative Support Cuesta College Daisy Chavez, Copy Writing Cal Poly Yukie Murphy, Graphic Design & Editing Cal Poly Jo Ann Lloyd, Copy Editing Cal Poly 1.a Packet Pg. 43 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) APPENDIX B: Council Agenda Report 1.a Packet Pg. 44 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 45 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 46 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 47 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 48 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 49 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 50 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 51 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 52 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 53 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 54 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 55 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 56 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 57 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 58 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 59 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 60 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 61 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 62 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 63 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 64 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 65 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 66 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 67 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 1.a Packet Pg. 68 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellne ss and Community Civility Initiative: Summary Report from the City of San Luis Obispo Opinion Survey Peter B. Chi, Ph.D. Department of Statistics California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 1 Intro duction On May 21, 2013, the Neighborhood Wellne ss / Community Civility Effort was launched in order to foster and improve the relationship between year round residents of San Luis Obispo, and students of California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly), and Cuesta College. Specifically, there has been a growing concern regarding student partying and disruptive behavior across the city of San Luis Obispo. This has been highlighted by particular incidents of recent years, such as Cal Poly’s Week of Welco me (WOW) in 2012, when an estimated 2000+ students congregated in the residential area just directly south of campus, causing disruption and safety concerns as roads became impassable (City of San Luis Obispo, 2013) In addition to implementing particular strategies aimed at addressing WOW scheduling to at- tempt to keep students occupied on campus instead of disrupting neighborhoods surrounding cam- pus, the Neighborhood Wellness / Community Civility Effort implemented an opinion survey across the city of San Luis Obispo. This survey was meant to capture feedback from permanent residents and students, with the aim of identifying strategies to produce outcomes towards the overall goal of neighborhood wellness. In this report, data from the survey a re analyzed and reported in order to identify any notable trends. With no specific a priori hypotheses, this exploratory data analysis aims to capture anything that may be revealed from the data. A particular focus of the analyses, however, will be on identifying potential sources of conflict between Cal Poly students and non-student residents of San Luis Obispo. APPENDIX C: Full Survey Results Page 54 1.a Packet Pg. 69 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 2 Metho dology The City of San Luis Obispo Opinion Survey was distributed with utility bills and across campus at Cal Poly. A total of 3,807 responses were received, and entered into SurveyMonkey (SurveyMonkey Inc., 2014). For analyses, the entire dataset was exported from SurveyMonkey as a comma-separated text file and imported into the statistical analys is p latform called R (R Development Core Team, 2011). Questions were written to either gain identifying information on an individual (such as “With what ethnicity do you most identify?”), or to gain content regarding how the individual feels about a particular topic or situation (such as a Likert-scale response to “I feel as though my neighbors are respectful of my property.”). For this report, these will be referred to as “identifying questions” and “content questions,” respectively. Figures 1 and 2 below are the actual survey, where the identifying questions can be seen in Figure 1: Questions 1 through 12, and the content questions are Questions 13 through the end, across both Figures 1 and 2. 1. Do you live in San Luis Obispo city limits? O Yes. I am eligible to continue with the survey. O No. If you do not currently live in San Luis Obispo we would appreciate your willingness to fill out the survey. However, our primary initial focus is to target relations within San Luis Obispo city limits and we are limiting survey participants to this area. 2. What is your age? O 18-24 years old O 59-65 years old O 25-31 years old O 66-71 years old O 32-38 years old O 72-78 years old O 39-45 years old O 79-85 years old O 46-51 years old O 86+ years old O 52-58 years old 3. With what gender do you identify? O Male O Transgender O Female O No response. 4. Are you currently attending Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, Cuesta College, or Allan Hancock College? O Yes. I am attending Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. O Yes. I am attending Cuesta College. O Yes. I am attending Allan Hancock College. O No. I am not currently attending any of these schools. If you are attending one of these schools, what year are you and what is your major? 5. With what ethnicity do you most identify? O African American/Black O American Indian/Alaska Native O Asian O Latino O Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander O White/Caucasian O Other (please specify): 6. Where is your current residence located? Please use your best judgement when picking a neighborhood O On Cal Poly’s campus. O Laguna area. O Cal Poly area. O Tank Farm/Broad area. O Johnson/Sinsheimer area. O Downtown area. O Foothill/N. Chorro area. 7. How many years have you lived in San Luis Obispo? 8. Were you born in San Luis Obispo? O Yes O No 9. How many people live in your household (include yourself in the number)? O 1 O 3 O 5 O 7 O 2 O 4 O 6 O 8+ 10. In what age group are the people who live in your household (mark all that apply)? O 0-17 years old O 52-58 years old O 18-24 years old O 59-65 years old O 25-31 years old O 66-71 years old O 32-38 years old O 72-78 years old O 39-45 years old O 79-85 years old O 46-51 years old O 86+ years old 11. How many more years do you see yourself staying in San Luis Obispo? O I have no plans of leaving. O 1 year O 5 years O 2 years O 6 years O 3 years O 7 years O 4 years O 8+ years 12. If you are renting your residence, please mark all that apply: O I am renting a room in a shared residence. O My residence is managed by a property management company. O My landlord lives outside San Luis Obispo. O My landlord lives in San Luis Obispo. O My landlord lives in my residence. O I am not renting my residence. O Other (please specify): 13. When I return to my house after school or work: O I can assume that there will be parking relatively close to my house. O I frequently have trouble finding parking relatively close to my house. O I rarely find parking relatively close to my house. Comments: 14. After the garbage companies empty the trashcans, I usually bring in my household’s trashcans off of the street: O The same evening. O Sometime the next day. O Within the next 2 – 3 days. O Within the next week. Comments: 15. After the garbage companies empty the trashcans, my neighbors usually bring in their household’s trashcans off of the street: O The same evening. O Sometime the next day. O Within the next 2 – 3 days. O Within the next week. Comments: 16. I frequently observe the following conditions in my neighborhood (check all that apply)? O Parking on the front yard. O Parking in the driveway with the vehicle extending over the sidewalk. O Fences with missing boards or that is not structurally sound. O Indoor furniture used outside or placed on rooftops. O Storage of inoperable vehicles or equipment. O Storage of building materials or other debris not associated with a valid building permit. O Illegally parked cars (i.e. opposite direction, red curb, etc.) Other (Please specify): 17. I feel my neighborhood should be quiet on a weeknight (Sunday – Thursday) by approximately: O 7 p.m. – 8 p.m. O 8 p.m. – 9 p.m. O 9 p.m. – 10 p.m. O 10 p.m. – 11 p.m. O 11 p.m. or later Comments: 18. I typically notice my neighborhood is quiet on a weeknight (Sunday – Thursday) by approximately: O 7 p.m. – 8 p.m. O 8 p.m. – 9 p.m. O 9 p.m. – 10 p.m. O 10 p.m. – 11 p.m. O 11 p.m. or later Comments: 19. I feel my neighborhood should be quiet on a weekend night (Friday – Saturday) by approximately: O 7 p.m. – 8 p.m. O 8 p.m. – 9 p.m. O 9 p.m. – 10 p.m. O 10 p.m. – 11 p.m. O 11 p.m. or later Comments: 20. I typically notice my neighborhood is quiet on a weekend night (Friday - Saturday) by approximately: O 7 p.m. – 8 p.m. O 8 p.m. – 9 p.m. O 9 p.m. – 10 p.m. O 10 p.m. – 11 p.m. O 11 p.m. or later Comments: 21. I feel comfortable addressing my neighbor if a concern arises. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree O O O O O Comments: 22. I feel as though my neighbors are respectful of my property. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree O O O O O Comments: 23. I think there is enough unsolicited police presence (not responding to a call) in my neighborhood. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree O O O O O Comments: 24. I would like to see more unsolicited police presence (not responding to a call) in my neighborhood. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree O O O O O Comments: 25. Please mark all that apply in regards to the following statement: If one of my neighbors hosts a social gathering, I often notice… O Parking becomes unavailable quickly. O Garbage is left on my or other neighbors’ property. O Vomit on my or other neighbors’ property. O Other unwanted objects on my property. O Loud and disruptive activity on the street. O Little or no problems. Comments: 26. When I first moved to San Luis Obispo, the quality of life within the San Luis Obispo residential community was: Strongly Unfavorable Neutral Favorable Strongly Unfavorable Favorable O O O O O Comments: 27. Currently, I feel the quality of life within the San Luis Obispo residential community is: Strongly Unfavorable Neutral Favorable Strongly Unfavorable Favorable O O O O O Comments: 28. If there is a discrepancy between your answers to Questions 26 and 27, please comment on the shift of your view on community climate. Comments: Figure 1: Opinion Survey, page 1 APPENDIX C: Full Survey Results Page 55 1.a Packet Pg. 70 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) 29. I believe the relationship between college-age students and permanent residents is important. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree O O O O O Comments: 30. I believe college-age students provide value to the San Luis Obispo community. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree O O O O O Comments: 31. I believe permanent residents provide value to the San Luis Obispo community. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree O O O O O Comments: 32. I believe a meaningful relationship between the college- age students and permanent residents should be a priority of the local government. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree O O O O O Comments: 33. I feel as if I am welcome to participate in discussions about improving community relationships. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree O O O O O Comments: 34. I feel as if I should be included in discussions about improving community relationships. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree O O O O O Comments: 35. I believe college-age students provide an important role in facilitating economic growth within the San Luis Obispo community. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree O O O O O Comments: 36. I would recommend living in my neighborhood to a friend. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree O O O O O Comments: 37. I support a rental inspection program for commercial and residential housing. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree O O O O O Comments: 38. I believe property owners of rental properties are responsible for ensuring tenants are not disruptive to neighbors. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree O O O O O Comments: 39. I believe property owners can be proactive with their tenants about not being disruptive in residential neighborhoods. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree O O O O O Comments: 40. I believe city leaders have enacted ordinances and programs to improve neighborhood civility. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree O O O O O Comments: 41. I believe Cal Poly and Cuesta have enacted policies and regulations for standards of conduct for their students to improve neighborhood civility. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree O O O O O Comments: 42. Have you ever been invited to be a participant in a discussion that involved Cal Poly and/or Cuesta and permanent residents? O Yes O No Other (Please specify): 43. Have you ever participated in a discussion that involved Cal Poly/Cuesta and permanent residents? O Yes O No Other (Please specify): 44. If invited to participate in a discussion that involved Cal Poly/Cuesta and permanent residents, would you participate? O Yes O No Other (Please specify): 45. At what times of the year, if any, do you notice the most disturbances in community neighborhoods? O Winter O Spring O Summer O Fall Comments: 46. If you could fix one issue in San Luis Obispo, what would it be? 47. What suggestions do you have to improve the relations between the college-age students and permanent residents? 48. Are you interested in being contacted to share your opinions on these community related issues in the future? O Yes, my e-mail is: O No Neighborhood Wellness and Community Civility Initiative CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO OPINION SURVEY In May of 2013, community representatives, Cuesta and Cal Poly administrators, students, and San Luis Obispo officials convened and ultimately launched a Neighborhood W ellness and Community Civility Initiative. Collectively, the group has a vision of a community in which year round residents and students actively collaborate to build community and communicate in an environment that fosters mutual respect and understanding. With this vision comes a goal of enhancing the quality of life for all residents, with particular emphasis on building positive relations between residential and student–aged neighbors through a cultural shift in social behaviors. To learn more about this initiative, please visit www.slocity.org/police/communitycivility.asp The following survey is an integral s t e p i n this initiative. In order to assess the current conditions of neighborhood wellness, surveying residents of all ages and backgrounds will provide guidance for future actions taken by officials of San Luis Obispo, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, and Cuesta College. Please answer honestly and explain when you feel necessary. Should you have concerns arise about the survey, please contact Christine Wallace at cwallace@slocity.org. You have two options. You may complete the enclosed survey and return it in the postage-paid envelope OR you may complete the survey on-line at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/PPNJHF6. Only one survey per person and only one survey per official postage-paid envelope please. Figure 2: Opinion Survey, page 2 Where appropriate, distributions of variables were compared using a standard statistical proce- dure known as a χ2 goodness-of-fit test (Pearson, 1900). As this pro ject was exploratory in nature, however, few formal statistical tests were actually performed. The ma jority of trends were simply shown in a qualitative manner, in graphical or tabular form. Additionally, a regular expression search was performed for certain free response questions, to isolate any common words that appeared most frequently. 3 Results 3.1 Descriptive Statistics An overview of our dataset, resulting from 3807 survey responses, is shown in Table 1. As expected, the vast ma jority of those between 18-24 years old are Cal Poly students (1591 out of 1672). Also, approximately 23% of non-students live in two areas that have a substantial student population: the APPENDIX C: Full Survey Results Page 56 1.a Packet Pg. 71 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) All residents Non-students Cal Poly Students Cuesta Students Characteristic Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Age 18-24 years o ld 1672 47.9130.8159195.86051.7 25-31 years o ld 144 4.168 4 543.32118.1 32-38 years o ld 117 3.4101 6 100.6 5 4.3 39-45 years o ld 119 3.41076.330.2 8 6.9 46-51 years o ld 114 3.31096.50 0 5 4.3 52-58 years o ld 264 7.625615.210.1 6 5.2 59-65 years o ld 346 9.933619.90 0 7 6 66-71 years o ld 275 7.927316.20 0 1 0.9 72-78 years o ld 205 5.919611.60 0 2 1.7 79-85 years o ld 148 4.21448.50 0 1 0.9 86+ years o ld 87 2.5834.920.1 0 0 Ethnicity African American/Black 17 0.5 4 0.2 12 0.7 1 0.9 American Indian/Alaska Native 12 0.370.4 2 0.1 3 2.6 Asian 167 4.8352.11287.7 3 2.6 Latino 162 4.7321.91136.8 15 13 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 14 0.480.5 5 0.3 1 0.9 White/Caucasian 2951 85.2151891.1132980.2 85 73.9 Other (please specify) 140 4623.7 69 4.2 7 6.1 Neighborhood Cal Poly area. 746 21.6 134 8 592 35.7 18 18 Downtown area. 427 12.3 281 16.7 127 7.7 19 19 Foothill/N. Chorro area. 629 18.2 252 15 354 21.4 16 16 Johnson/Sinsheimer area. 372 10.8 305 18.2 52 3.1 11 11 Laguna area. 469 13.6 333 19.8 115 6.9 16 16 On Cal Poly’s campus. 376 10.9 0 0 374 22.6 1 1 Tank Far m/Broad area. 441 12.7 373 22.2 43 2.6 19 19 Table 1: Descriptive Statistics for the entire dataset “Cal Poly area” and the “Foothill/N. Chorro area.” Among these non-student residents of these two areas, roughly 90% of them are above the age of 38, pointing towards the possibility of conflict between these residents and Cal Poly students. To determine the extent to which our study sample may have been biased with respect to the target population of all San Luis Obispo citizens, a comparison of the distributions of age and eth- nicity from our survey was made to that of 2010 Census data (U.S. Census Bureau, 2010). The χ2 goodness-of-fit test revealed that our age and ethnicity distributions were indeed statistically significantly different from those of the Census data. Specifically, 18-24 year olds were overrep- resented in our sample (47.9% compared to 39.6% in Census data), and African Americans were APPENDIX C: Full Survey Results Page 57 1.a Packet Pg. 72 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) underrepresented in our sample (0.5% compared to 1.2% in Census data). Additionally, Hispanic o r Latino ethnicities were not explicitly recorded in the 2010 Census data, so our accuracy with this population is unknown. 3.2 Strong Majority Opinion Exploration Our first analysis was to examine whether any content questions had a strong ma jority responding in any particular way. We scanned through the entire survey responses, with a threshold of 80% indicating a strong ma jority. Also, we looked at this within subgroups of the dataset, with subgroups defined by combinations of the identifying questions. Among all of the content questions, only two questions surfaced as having strong ma jority opin- ions through this exploration. They were (with majority response bolded): • W hen I return to my house after school or work: – I can assume that there will be parking relatively close to my house – I frequently have trouble finding parking relatively close to my house – I rarely find parking relatively close to my house • After the garbage companies empty the trashcans, I usually bring in my household’s trashcans off of the street: – The same evening – Sometime the next day – Within the next 2-3 days – Within the next week In the entire dataset, 81.1% responded that they can find parking relatively close to their house, and 80.9% responded that they bring in their trashcans on the same evening. Among subgroups defined by age, gender, ethnicity and all other identifying questions, plus combinations thereof, many subgroups identified these same two questions/responses at a greater than 80% rate. No other content question surfaced as having at least 80% of responses matching. APPENDIX C: Full Survey Results Page 58 1.a Packet Pg. 73 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Prop o rtion 0.0 0 .2 0 .4 0 .6 0 .8 3.3 Contrasting Questions Exploration 3.3.1 Trashcans As observed in the previous section, 80.9% of the study sample reported that they bring their trashcans in on the same day. While this does not directly point to any possible conflict, we can compare this to the responses of the next question: “After the garbage companies empty the trashcans, my neighbors usually bring in their household’s trashcans off of the street. . . ” Specifically, we can examine the distribution of responses among those who stated that they bring in their trashcans on the same day. Any of these individuals who report that their neighbors do anything other than bring their trashcans in on the same day will form a group who are potentially upset by this situation. This is summarized in Figure 3. Neighbors bring in their trashcans... (among those who responded that they bring in their trashcans the same evening) The same Sometime the Within the Within the evening next day next 2−3 days next week Response Figure 3: Distribution of responses about their neighbors, by people who reported bringing in their own trashcans on the same evening as the garbage companies empty them Since this is only among those who responded that they themselves bring in their trashcans on APPENDIX C: Full Survey Results Page 59 1.a Packet Pg. 74 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Prop o rtion 0. 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0 the same evening that the garbage companies empty them, it is plausible that they might expect the same from their neighbors. Thus, we observe that just over 30% of these individuals might potentially be upset by this situation. Additionally, we explored whether this dichotomy was driven by a differing attitude between students and non-students. That is, when do students b ring in their trashcans, and when do non- students b ring in their trashcans? This is summarized in Figure 4. After the garbage companies empty the trashcans, I usually bring in my trashcans off the street: Non−students CP students The same Sometime the Within the Within the evening next day next 2−3 days next week Response Figure 4: Student vs. non-student responses regarding when they bring in their own trashcans As we observe above, Cal Poly students tend to bring their trashcans in at a later time than the non-student population. In particular, only about 60% of Cal Poly students report that they bring their trashcans in on the same evening. Finally, we examined the free responses attached to this question. Among a total of 156 non- students who left a free response, approximately 35 of them left a comment that voiced frustration at the situation, such as: • “But some NEVER bring them in!” • “The adults do. Students not so much.” • “Po ly students don’t understand trash rules.” APPENDIX C: Full Survey Results Page 60 1.a Packet Pg. 75 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Prop o r tion 0. 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 7−8p m 8−9p m 9−10 p m 10 −11 p m 11 p m o r lat e r In contrast, approximately 10 of the comments appeared to indicate that this should not be a concern of the city, e.g.: “I actually have no idea, I don’t care what my neighbors do with their trash cans as long as they don’t block my driveway.” The remaining comments appeared to be either neutral or of undeterminable tone. Also, an exam- ination of the student comments to this question revealed virtually zero who voiced frustration at the situation. It is important to note, however, that all of these counts are quite imprecise, as it was left entirely up to human judgement of a written phrase. 3.3.2 Time that it should b e quiet Questions 17 and 18 asked contrasting questions about what time it should be, and actually is, quiet on a weeknight. The overall distributions are summarized in Figure 5. I feel my neighborhood should be/is quiet on a weeknight (Sunday −Thursday) by approximately: should be is Figure 5: Side-by-side distributions of when it should be and is quiet on a weeknight. To determine the proportion who might potentially be upset at the situation surrounding this ques- tion, we categorized people as “potentially upset” if they responded that it usually is quiet at a later time than what they stated for when it should be quiet. In the entire dataset, 16.8% responded that it is quiet at a later time than they feel that it should be, on a weeknight. When separated APPENDIX C: Full Survey Results Page 61 1.a Packet Pg. 76 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Prop o r tion 0. 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 7−8p m 8−9p m 9−10 p m 10 −11 p m 11 p m o r lat e r into Cal Po ly students and non-students, the percentage potentially upset was 17.0% and 16.4%, respectively. Questions 19 and 20 were similar to Questions 17 and 18, but posed for the weekend nights. The overall distributions are summarized in Figure 6. I feel my neighborhood should be/is quiet on a weekend (Friday−Satu rday) by approximately: should be is Figure 6: Side-by-side distributions of when it should be and is quiet on a weekend. To determine the proportion who might potentially be upset at the situation surrounding this ques- tion, we categorized people as “potentially upset” if they responded that it usually is quiet at a later time than what they stated for when it should be quiet. In the entire dataset, 14.8% responded that it is quiet at a later time than they feel that it should be, on a weekend night. When separated into Cal Poly students and non-students, the percentages potentially upset were 9.9% and 18.0%, respectively. 3.3.3 Quality of life at first vs. currently Questions 26 and 27 asked about the quality of life in San Luis Obispo, when first moved to the town, and currently. The overall distributions are summarized in Figure 7. Overall, it appears that people are reporting a declining quality of life after living in San Luis Obispo for some amount of tim e. Specifically, 28.8% of all respondants reported that their current quality of life is worse than when they first moved to San Luis Obispo. W hen separated into Cal Poly students and non-students, the percentages reporting a worse quality of life currently were 13.0% and 40.4%, respectively. APPENDIX C: Full Survey Results Page 62 1.a Packet Pg. 77 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Prop o rtion 0. 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 Quality of live when first moved to / currently in San Luis Obispo: When first moved Currently Strongly Favorable Neutral Unfavorable Strongly Favorable Unfavorable Figure 7: Side-by-side distributions of quality of life when first m oved to San Luis Obispo vs. currently. An examination of the written comments, however, revealed no obvious trend or cause of the decline. Among non-students, comments ranged from “crime, drugs, late nite partys, housing authority trash/noise” to “Too much nit-picking while real problems go unresolved.” Although far fewer Cal Poly students reported a decline in quality of life over the time that they have lived here, there was a modest trend towards comments that expressed disdain for increasing rules/restrictions and police presence among those who did (16 out of 37 total written comments from Cal Po ly students). 3.4 Cal Poly and Footh ill / N. Chorro area residents As mentioned in Section 3.1, the Cal Poly and Foothill / N. Chorro area are two locations in San Luis Obispo with a high mixing of students and non-students. A summary of responses to the Likert scale questions, separated by students and non-students in these areas, is shown in Table 2. APPENDIX C: Full Survey Results Page 63 1.a Packet Pg. 78 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Table 2: Likert scale questions for residents of the Cal Poly and Foothill / N. Chorro area residents, separated by Cal Poly students and non-students. Strongly Strongly AgreeAgree Neutral Disagree Disagree I feel as though my neighbors are respectful of my property. Cal Poly Students 0.21 0.46 0.18 0.11 0.05 Non-students 0.29 0.41 0.14 0.11 0.05 I would like to see more unsolicited police presence (not responding to a call) in my neighborhood. Cal Poly Students 0.03 0.11 0.27 0.25 0.33 Non-students 0.200.290.360.110.05 I believe the relationship between college age students and permanent residents is important. Cal Poly Students 0.34 0.53 0.10 0.02 0.01 Non-students 0.540.390.05 0.010.01 I believe college age students provide value to the San Luis Obispo community. Cal Poly Students 0.51 0.39 0.07 0.02 0.01 Non-students 0.260.510.180.040.02 I believe permanent residents provide value to the San Luis Obispo community. Cal Poly Students 0.39 0.49 0.10 0.02 0.01 Non-students 0.710.260.010.010.01 I believe a meaningful relationship between the college age students and permanent residents should be a priority of the local government. Cal Poly Students 0.19 0.40 0.26 0.11 0.05 Non-students 0.420.400.130.020.02 I feel as if I am welcome to participate in discussions about improving community relationships. Cal Poly Students 0.07 0.28 0.33 0.22 0.10 Non-students 0.140.510.260.070.02 I feel as if I should be included in discussions about improving community relationships. Cal Poly Students 0.20 0.46 0.29 0.05 0.00 Non-students 0.170.510.290.020.01 I believe college age students provide an important role in facilitating economic growth within the San Luis Obispo community. Cal Poly Students 0.60 0.33 0.05 0.01 0.00 I would recommend living in my neighborhood to a friend. Non-students 0.29 0.44 0.19 0.06 0.02 Cal Poly Students 0.390.45 0.110.030.02 Non-students 0.320.330.140.100.11 I support a rental inspection program for commercial and residential rental housing. Cal Poly Students 0.200.320.270.140.08 Non-students 0.370.310.160.080.07 I believe property owners of rental properties are responsible for ensuring tenants are not disruptive to neighbors. Cal Poly Students 0.09 0.270.240.260.14 Non-students 0.53 0.310.05 0.060.05 I believe property owners can be proactive with their tenants about not being disruptive in residential neighborhoods. Cal Poly Students 0.110.500.25 0.090.06 Non-students 0.55 0.370.060.020.01 I believe city leaders have enacted ordinances and programs to improve neighborhood civility. Cal Poly Students 0.05 0.300.380.130.14 Non-students 0.100.45 0.320.100.03 I believe Cal Poly and Cuesta have enacted policies and regulations for standards of conduct for their students to improve neighborhood civility. Cal Poly Students 0.060.35 0.380.130.08 Non-students 0.040.280.410.200.09 11 1.a Packet Pg. 79 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Notably, the distribution of responses for Cal Po ly students vs. Non-students differed at a statistically significant level for all of the questions in the table above, except for the question: “I feel as if I should be included in discussions about improving community relation- ships.” That is, every other Likert scale question in the above table points to a dichotomy of attitudes when comparing students vs. non-students who live in the Cal Poly and Foothill / N. Chorro areas. One specific contrast of interest is the differing of attitudes about who should be responsible for whether tenants are disruptive to their neighbors o r not. Among non-students, roughly 80- 90% believe (either “Strongly Agree” or “Agree”) that property owners should be responsible for their tenants regarding their disruptiveness to neighbors, whereas only about 30% of students feel similarly. On the other hand, when asked if property owners can be proactive about the same issue, approximately 60% of students responded with either “Strongly Agree” or “Agree,” pointing to at least some degree of openness to communication with their landlords regarding noise issues. Additionally, the trashcan and quiet time issues from Sections 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 are at an increased level in the Cal Poly and Foothill / N. Chorro areas. Using the same “potentially upset” definition as in the previous sections, approximately 37.0% of non-students living in these areas fall into this categorization. By comparison, in Section 3.3.1 we saw that approximately 30% of all citizens (that is, all students and non-students) fell into this categorization; in fact, this percentage is the same for non-students across all neighborhoods, indicating an increase in the proportion in this category for the Cal Poly and Foothill / N. Chorro areas. Regarding the tim e that it should be quiet on a weekday night, approximately 28.0% of non-students are categorized as potentially upset, and 31.2% are potentially upset for the weekend nights (compared to 17.0% and 18.0% as stated in Section 3.3.2). 3.5 Issues and Suggestions: written comments Question 46 asked: “If you could fix one issue in San Luis Obispo, what would it be?” APPENDIX C: Full Survey Results Page 65 1.a Packet Pg. 80 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Using a regular expression search, Table 3 shows the most common words found in the responses, separated by students and non-students. non-students Cal Poly students word count word count downtown 110 students 142 homeless 90 college91 traffic 87 residents 53 rental 72 noise52 Poly 58 campus 47 street 42 parking 46 noise 41 housing 46 bars 40 police42 residents 39 permanent 41 cars 35 Poly 39 Table 3: Most common words found in written responses to the question, “If you could fix one issue in San Luis Obispo, what would it be?” All short words such as prepositions, conjunctions, and other low-content words (such as “more”) were removed from the list. Some words that do appear on the list may not be that revealing, such as the usage of “students” or “college” by Cal Poly students in their comments. On the other hand, an examination of the non-student comments containing the word “downtown” showed comments that mainly focused on homelessness (overlapping with #2) and disruptive behavior associated with the bars (overlapping with #8). Question 47 asked: “W hat suggestions do you have to improve the relations between the college-age students and permanent residents?” Again using a regular expression search, Table 4 shows the most common words found in the responses to this question, separated by students and non-students. APPENDIX C: Full Survey Results Page 66 1.a Packet Pg. 81 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) non-students Cal Poly students word count word count students 335 students 192 neighbors 103 residents 153 residents 93 college137 Poly 80 permanent 111 college 80 community 71 campus 75 campus 55 respect 70 neighbors 45 community 60 noise36 landlords 45 people 35 behavior 44 think 35 Table 4: Most common words found in written responses to the question, “W hat suggestions do you have to improve the relationship between the college-age students and permanent residents?” Again, not all words are extremely revealing. Of note, however, is the fact that the words “rule(s),”, “regulation(s),” and “fine(s)” do not appear on either list, suggesting that neither students nor non-students tend to believe that an increase in city ordinances is the answer. In contrast, we see words such as “respect,” “community” and “neighbors,” suggesting that ultimately, students and non-students would like to co-exist in a harmonious manner. A specific response to this question that exemplifies this sentiment is one from a non-student living in the Foothill / N. Chorro area that states: “Have a beer with them - as long as they are of legal drinking age. Otherwise, you might have to buy them a fountain drink.” 4 Discussion and Conclusions In this report, we summarize the results f rom the City of San Luis Obispo Opinion Survey. Certain trends were explored, with a focus on potential sources of conflict between Cal Poly students and non- student residents of San Luis Obispo. It is important to note that, since this analysis was exploratory in nature, all of the findings must be treated as suggestive, rather than as strong evidence in favor or in opposition of any notion. Additionally, there is a slight concern for bias in the dataset, as noted in Section 3.1. The distributions of age and ethnicity in our survey dataset were statistically significantly different from APPENDIX C: Full Survey Results Page 67 1.a Packet Pg. 82 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) that of the Census data. However, the differences were not drastic; although this may indeed be a concern, it is relatively minor. Among all potential sources of conflict in San Luis Obispo, the one with the largest indication is the time that neighbors bring their trashcans in, with approxim ately 30% of all residents being potentially upset. Noise at night does not appear to be as much of an issue, except specifically in the Cal Poly and Foothill / N. Chorro areas, where non-students are potentially upset at a rate of approximately 30% on both weeknights and weekends. The survey also revealed a vast dichotomy of attitudes between non-students and Cal Poly students. This is exposed in the responses to the Likert Scale questions in Table 2, and also with regard to when each group tends to bring their trashcans in. It does not appear likely that this systematic difference in attitude could be corrected by specific fines and ordinances. Rather, any strategy to remedy this must be aimed at addressing this broadly, both am ong students who plan to live off-campus, and for non-students who live in heavily student-populated areas. Future work could examine the question of whether any implemented strategies are working. In particular, certain increases in fines have indeed been in place since May 2010, aimed specifically at Halloween and St. Patrick’s Day (City of San Luis Obispo, 2013). Fr om a statistical standpoint, the data up to this point do not suggest that the increase in fines have been an effective deterrent of citable offenses. It is of course possible that, with more data, the evidence could arise, and this question could possibly be addressed properly at that time. However, as mentioned above, this report does not support the notion that specific increases in fines will achieve outcomes consistent with neighborhood wellness. As student and non-student attitudes and expectations about residential life in San Luis Obispo are so dichotomous at this time, this must be addressed systematically, rather than by attempting to deter specific behaviors. APPENDIX C: Full Survey Results Page 68 1.a Packet Pg. 83 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) References City of San Luis Obispo. Council agenda report, 2013. K. Pearson. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philosophical Magazine Series, 50:157–175, 1900. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foun- dation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2011. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. SurveyMonkey Inc. Surveymonkey. http://www.surveymonkey.com, 2014. U.S. Census Bureau. Census 2010, 2010. APPENDIX C: Full Survey Results Page 69 1.a Packet Pg. 84 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) APPENDIX D: Matrix of all action items Objective One: Actions Desired Outcomes Implementation Leads & Partners Timeline for Implementation Schedule regular neighborhood tours with city council, mayor, neighbors, Cal Poly and Cuesta leaders, etc. Allow neighbors to point out neighborhood issues Cal Poly Ongoing, began Summer of 2014 Investigate establishing S.N.A.P. Ride-Along program and promote current Police Ride Along program Increase the amount of support to assist with complaints and allow officers to do other police work City of San Luis Obispo Fall 2015 Explore the option of creating a noise ordinance in public spaces on streets and sidewalks for gatherings of more than 50 people by issuing citations or other alternative options Decrease number of noise complaints City of San Luis Obispo Spring 2016 Consider expanding tools to enforce ordinances for nuisance properties including, but not limited to, “tagging” properties that meet a definition of a public nuisance or unruly gatherings in terms of both property- maintenance concerns and behavior issues Hold repeat noise violators accountable City of San Luis Obispo Spring 2016 Evaluate policies so that new development or redevelopment does not unduly impact neighborhoods. Decrease properties that allow for high occupancy City of San Luis Obispo Fall 2016 Appendix D: Matrix of all action items Page 70 1.a Packet Pg. 85 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Objective Two: Actions Desired Outcomes Implementation Leads & Partners Timeline for Implementation Evaluate best practices and implement strategies to reduce the number of disruptions from parties and noise in neighborhoods (as referenced in Objective Three) Reduce noise disruptions Cal Poly and Cuesta College (programmatic) City of San Luis Obispo (enforcement) Fall 2015 Develop and implement a rental housing inspection program Insure that rental units comply with required minimum health and safety standards City of San Luis Obispo Fall 2016 Implement a range of strategies to change the relationship and culture between students and non-students in neighborhoods (no specific recommendations discerned from the survey results) Improve student and community relationships Cal Poly Associated Student, Inc. (ASI) and Associate Students for Cuesta College (ASCC) Spring 2016 Explore and implement strategies to address the concentration of bars in the downtown area and related safety issues. Consider using strategies identified in the Land Use and Circulation Element update to achieve this objective Address and decrease safety-related issues City of San Luis Obispo Ongoing per LUCE strategies Implement educational programs to increase the number of student-aged residents who bring in their trashcans on the same day the trash is picked up Increase the number of student-age residents to comply with the 24-hour ordinance City of San Luis Obispo Ongoing Continue to implement strategies to address homelessness in San Luis Obispo (particularly in the downtown area) A reduction in the impacts of homelessness on the community City of San Luis Obispo Ongoing Implement strategies to reduce traffic issues in neighborhoods. Consider using strategies identified in the Land Use and Circulation Element update to achieve this objective Reduce traffic-related issues in neighborhoods City of San Luis Obispo Ongoing Appendix D: Matrix of all action items Page 71 1.a Packet Pg. 86 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Objective Three: Actions Desired Outcomes Implementation Leads & Partners Timeline for Implementation Create and implement a transition to Off-Campus Living Education Program, to be shared with Cuesta College’s Student Life Office Set expectations and responsibilities for students living in neighborhoods in the City of San Luis Obispo Cal Poly Summer 2015 Work with the city to generate a neighborhood map of housing rental properties and provide outreach to student renters by funding welcome bags for neighbors to distribute to establish positive interactions Establish positive interaction with City Cal Poly ASI , ASCC, City of San Luis Obispo Spring 2016 Create a Renter/Rental Housing Inspection Program Rental properties that meet minimum health and safety standards Cal Poly, City of San Luis Obispo Spring 2016 Develop outreach and marketing efforts toward students Raise awareness of the impacts of noise on neighborhood Cal Poly Spring 2016 Implement a Party Registration Program. Develop a program to incentivize party registration that provides the opportunity for the San Luis Obispo Police Department to contact the party registrant and offer a 20- minute warning before dispatching S.N.A.P. or a police officer Fewer noise citations City of San Luis Obispo Spring 2016 Initiate Dialog Dinners or Block Parties for students and residents to talk about what they like most about their neighborhoods Create positive interactions between students and year- round residents Cal Poly ASI, ASCC Ongoing Promote the principles of the The Mustang Way in neighborhoods Enhance a positive culture of peer-to-peer accountability in neighborhoods Cal Poly ASI Ongoing Appendix D: Matrix of all action items Page 72 1.a Packet Pg. 87 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Continue to engage and communicate collaboratively among students, non-students and city groups Improve collaboration and understanding among students, non- students and city groups SCLC Ongoing Utilize various on-campus departments and offices that support living off-campus to support students, non- students and permanent residents living in neighborhoods. Educate students about university policies and ordinances, strengthen neighborhood relations by facilitating dialogs Cal Poly & Cuesta College Fall 2015 Develop proactive engagement of law and code enforcement with visits to properties of concern; “Knock and Talk”. Positive engagement with law enforcement and decrease repeat offending properties City of San Luis Obispo Ongoing Implement a Joint Letter Program. Police contact with students in off-campus housing generates letter signed by university, police and city that outlines expectations sent to resident and landlord Cal Poly Fall 2015 Objective Four: Actions Desired Outcomes Implementation Leads & Partners Timeline for Implementation City and Cal Poly officials to craft a Memorandum of Understanding agreement between the city and university regarding police operational protocol within a one- mile radius Allows for coordination of resources to quickly respond to community concerns Cal Poly, City of San Luis Obispo Fall 2015 Partner Cal Poly and Cuesta police officers with San Luis Obispo Neighborhood Officers to coordinate resources and achieve program goals To coordinate resources and obtain program goals City of San Luis Obispo Fall 2015 City should explore additional proactive educational opportunities with Cal Poly and Change student culture related to neighborhood SCLC Fall 2016, and with each annual report Appendix D: Matrix of all action items Page 73 1.a Packet Pg. 88 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Cuesta College to change the student culture related to neighborhood wellness wellness Implement a keg registration program A reduction in underage alcohol use and an accountability mechanism for persons who serve minors City of San Luis Obispo Fall 2016 Conduct an internal assessment of the San Luis Obispo Police Department staffing to prepare for growth within the city and on the Cal Poly campus to ensure staffing needs match the population Meet the needs of the community as population grows City of San Luis Obispo Spring 2016 Conduct an internal assessment of the University Police Department staffing to meet the growth on the Cal Poly campus Meet the needs of Cal Poly as student population grows Cal Poly Spring 2016 Explore the possibility of Cal Poly Police being able to issue City Municipal Administrative Citations To be able to patrol in neighborhoods adjacent to Cal Poly campus Addressed via MOU identified above Location of a university police substation within the new residence hall project to coordinate law enforcement problem-solving efforts Coordinate law enforcement outreach and problem solving efforts Cal Poly Fall 2018 Objective Five: Actions Desired Outcomes Implementation Leads & Partners Timeline for Implementation Create an annual communications plan containing neighborhood wellness messages and a process for communicating the information effectively to maximize resources Effectively inform the community on matters of neighborhood wellness City of San Luis Obispo Winter 2015 Appendix D: Matrix of all action items Page 74 1.a Packet Pg. 89 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Objective Six: Actions Desired Outcomes Implementation Leads & Partners Timeline for Implementation Re-invest in the Student- Community Liaison Committee Become the coordinating body responsible for monitoring the recommendations, once adopted by the city council, Cal Poly and Cuesta College SCLC Fall 2015, ongoing The Student-Community Liaison Committee should assess the effectiveness of each recommendation once they have been implemented Recommend the appropriate changes, and produce an annual report on the state of neighborhood wellness in the City of San Luis Obispo SCLC Ongoing Shift SCLC memberships SCLC memberships should be reevaluated to directly involve those individuals (by their position) most directly involved in neighborhood wellness SCLC Spring 2016 Host an annual town hall meeting Present their report to the community, receive feedback and suggestions from the broader San Luis Obispo community SCLC Spring 2016, ongoing Appendix D: Matrix of all action items Page 75 1.a Packet Pg. 90 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) APPENDIX E: Post March 7 Recommendations Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Working Group Ideas to Investigate arranged by Objective *NOTE: These ideas were generated by the City of San Luis Obispo (e.g. public comment at March 17, 2015 City Council Meeting) and Cal Poly staff through a number of forums after the March 7, 2015 roof collapse on Hathway Street. These ideas were not discussed by the Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort working group and their inclusion in this report should not be considered an endorsement by the working group. Objective 1: Define short-term actions that could be implemented to enhance quality of life for all residents particularly associated in the timeframe around the opening of the Cal Poly and Cuesta College campuses at the beginning of the school year. 1 Develop smoother lines of communication between the city, Cal Poly and Cuesta both proactively and reactively. 2 Students need to be informed of the consequences of their actions off campus and perhaps have responses strengthened to moderate behavior. 3 Quicker administrative response is needed to violations of behavior off campus by the city, Cal Poly and Cuesta. Objective 2: Define Stakeholders’ Needs and Success 4 Create a tip line where anyone (students, neighbors, etc.) can report potential problems before they have negative impact on the community. Objective 3: Identify University/City Best Practices 5 Advance the effort to house Greek organizations on the Cal Poly campus. 6 Create a student ambassador program that has two components. The first component should be to promote positive relations in the community. The second component should be an anonymous social event attendee to report unsafe behavior to the appropriate authority. 7 Improve response time by SLOPD and UPD to reports of noise off campus. 8 Bring alternative social/entertainment opportunities on campus to reduce the reliance on off campus events for socialization. 9 Reach out to universities who consistently host regulated tailgate parties, with monitored alcohol distribution. Learn what works well for them and bring their best practices to Cal Poly tailgates. 10 Increase the methods to hold landlords accountable for the negative behavior of their tenants including court appearances by the landlord or denial of business license. 11 Suggest that landlords add clause in rental agreements that prevents any activity on roof. Appendix E: Post March 7 Recommendations Page 76 1.a Packet Pg. 91 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Working Group Ideas to Investigate arranged by Objective *NOTE: These ideas were generated by the City of San Luis Obispo (e.g. public comment at March 17, 2015 City Council Meeting) and Cal Poly staff through a number of forums after the March 7, 2015 roof collapse on Hathway Street. These ideas were not discussed by the Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort working group and their inclusion in this report should not be considered an endorsement by the working group. 12 Aggressively advance the Rental Inspection ordinance to identify unsafe and unhealthy properties. 13 Evaluate “Neighborhood Specialists” like in Davis (Maybe adjust hours/days of existing Neighborhood Specialists. 14 Continue to develop strategies that promote more diverse neighborhoods, including more owner-occupied and long-term rentals (ie workers and family rentals, not short term academic year rentals) 15 SLOPD and UPD should collaborate on methods to deter large crowds from migrating from area to area. 16 Implement programs that create peer to peer pressure, that help students own their actions and accept responsibility for behavior that does not promote neighborhood wellness. Objective 4: Review Enforcement Best Practices 17 Consider the size and scope of a party to help determine what safety and hazard city ordinances can be created/enforced? Perhaps double or triple fines during peak hours or holidays where large parties/events are expected. 18 Limit the number of student rental properties to one per street. 19 Create and enforce a 10:00 pm noise curfew with escalating noise fines by the hour. 20 More visible UPD presence on campus and in the residential neighborhoods immediately surrounding campus (an MOU is currently being finalized to allow UPD to issue municipal citations off campus). 21 Issue a citation to the leadership figure of the organization responsible for hosting an out- of-control party. Consider exploring ways to hold the national organization responsible as well. 22 Consider installing more security cameras to effectively monitor activity. 23 Create a staff position to investigate potential dangerous student activity before events take place. 24 Enforce limits on the size of parties at residential addresses. 25 Create a culture change regarding informants. Students offer information to a point, but stop divulging information for fear of implicating themselves. Re-work current policy to ensure informants will not be reprimanded to encourage future sharing. 26 Citations should be issued to those students who participated in negative events. 27 City approval should be required for individuals or organizations hosting a party over a Appendix E: Post March 7 Recommendations Page 77 1.a Packet Pg. 92 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Working Group Ideas to Investigate arranged by Objective *NOTE: These ideas were generated by the City of San Luis Obispo (e.g. public comment at March 17, 2015 City Council Meeting) and Cal Poly staff through a number of forums after the March 7, 2015 roof collapse on Hathway Street. These ideas were not discussed by the Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort working group and their inclusion in this report should not be considered an endorsement by the working group. certain number of people. 28 Red tag ordinance for houses that have unruly gatherings/noise citations should be implemented and last longer than the academic year. 29 Find a way to hold property managers or management companies accountable for the negative behavior at properties they manage. 30 Serious academic consequences up to suspension and expulsion should be on the table for Students who engage in activities that do not promote neighborhood wellness. 31 Immediately suspend or permanently ban fraternities who allow in any way illegal activities to happen via their instigation: rapes, underage drinking, hazing deaths, racist displays, unruly gatherings. Second chances seem to mean “go ahead” to this crowd. 32 Parental notification should be explored for off campus behavior. 33 Higher fines, double fines, longer fines, fines able to be raised at certain time of day. Objective 5: Engage Stakeholders: Review Current Educational And Information Efforts 34 Require students to complete an alcohol/safety education program before being allowed rush for a Greek organization (we should also consider limiting Greek organization recruitment to the first quarter of attendance). 35 Monitor Yik Yak and other social mediums used by our student population as a resource to inform us of potential dangerous situations. 36 SLOPD should consider utilizing social media scanning software to be more aware of activities planned off campus. 37 The city should inform the landlord every time the police are called to a rental property, even if no violation is found. 38 Enhance education on the dangers of large crowds: students need to learn this is as bad as drinking too much, nonconsensual sex and other immature or inappropriate or illegal behaviors. 39 Evaluate systems & structures in dorms to prevent mass exodus to mega social gathering and complement protocols to inform authorities (student affairs UPD SLOPD) of eminent threat of unruly gathering (mega social gathering). 40 Targeted patrolling by city and university police. Wider area for UPD patrols. Objective 6: Prepare for Sustained Engagement to Achieve Desired Vision and Goal 41 None. Appendix E: Post March 7 Recommendations Page 78 1.a Packet Pg. 93 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) MAINTAINING BALANCED NEIGHBORHOODS A Research Paper presented to the San Luis Obispo Civility W orking Group on Different Approaches to Students Living in Established Residential Areas July 18, 2014 APPENDIX F: Maintaining Balanced Neighborhoods Page 79 1.a Packet Pg. 94 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) I . . APPENDIX F: Maintaining Balanced Neighborhoods Page 80 1.a Packet Pg. 95 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) ""' CITY OF S.flll LUIS OBISPO Civilit y W orking Group The City of San Luis Obispo Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort is a working group comprised of City residents and representatives of Cal Poly State University (Cal Poly), Cuesta College and the City of San Luis Obispo (City). The goal of the working group is to enhance the quality of life for all residents, with particular emphasis on building positive relations between residential and student-aged neighbors through a cultural shift in social behavior. This goal is to be reached by identifying the needs of those involved and the short- term actions, long-term best practices and engagement efforts required by the City and schools to successfully meet those needs. Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort Cal Pol y President City Council Cuesta College President CUESTA 11LtJ COLLEGE ...- - ,•._.._,...,,..»..p. ublic lnput----lllllliiiiii Mission: Rf!s Mr.h, ill ntffy and implement Cal ..,...,..i--..;;::;r;;...., _..Recommend"'"•'"""""-''"'""""'"'"''"'.,...,_..,"",.a. Poly, Council, and Cvl!staJtrategies to l.'nh.m[ethequality of life for all residents with an emphasis on builtUngposltive relations between resldentiilland student-aced neighbors through COmmliltlllt'( De opment Deparl nt foWe DrD tl li'NI"I PubUcWor De:::: nl t1t Cal Poly l'rflld«llf'• v M.m.: grr omcr Cal Poly-City- Cuesta Working Group 7 ( LICOifii• ( NTI (I)iMIJ• Vir.ePfl.'SIJ:lNII Studuttufe l Smd""\' S•I'II M & qd .......,Hp A.!.todf{fd Slli OO"" PrM.Idt"nt acullurill!.hiltiu '------------------;r"' social behaviors Public / . _/\_\ Neighborhood Services Team Mission: EKChange .jei wJ -,; jl1 c.WHI c Y Neighborhood CM'M <i!.I YdMU C<Jifloty!>twh•JJl'> Cl f'oJyA I C.lll'olyHnu< "i Group\ Rfowdi' •Tf Information and Ideas to Implement nel&hborhood 1fllj21.Jl APPENDIX F: Maintaining Balanced Neighborhoods Page 81 1.a Packet Pg. 96 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) CITY OF S.fill LUIS OBISPO FROM: Katie Lichtig, City Manager, City of San Luis Obispo Prepared By: James David, Principal Analyst Lisa Letteriello, Administration Intern SUBJECT: MAINTAINING BALANCED NEIGHBORHOODS PURPOSE Review current local town-gown neighborhood issues and provide alternative practices in other communities that face similar student housing challenges in residential areas. DISCUSSION Situation The City of San Luis Obispo (City) is in close proximity to two colleges; Cuesta College and Cal Poly. Cuesta College is a commuter school without campus housing, and Cal Poly does not have sufficient on-campus housing for all enrolled students (there are plans to create more housing opportunities on-campus in the next five years). Furthermore, college students often prefer to live off-campus in their junior and senior years. These factors mean students seek housing in the City limits, and the most predominant housing type in the City is low-density single-family housing in established neighborhoods. A number of issues have been reported over the years related to students living in low-density residential neighborhoods: 1. Students tend to live in certain areas close to campus, which affects neighborhood diversity. High concentrations of student renters living in neighborhoods compounds and intensifies issues like partying, noise and parking. Renter-occupancy estimates for census tracts immediately adjacent to Cal Poly range from 59 to 95 percent renters: Selected Housing Characteristics from U.S. Census 1 CHARACTERISTIC CENSUS TRACT 109.01 CENSUS TRACT 109.02 CENSUS TRACT 112 TOTAL {ALL 3 TRACTS) CITYWIDE Total Housing Units 1,032 1,561 3,033 5,626 20,553 Single-Family Residences 10% 40% 62% 46% 54% Units Built 1950 to 1979 53% 64% 62% 61% 48% Owner-occupied Units 5% 13% 41% 26% 38% Renter-occupied Units 95% 87% 59% 74% 62% 1 Estimates do not include on-campus housing units, which are classified as "group quarters" by the U.S. Census. Source: 2008-12 American Community Survey, 2010 U.S. Census APPENDIX F: Maintaining Balanced Neighborhoods Page 82 1.a Packet Pg. 97 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) CITY OF SHU LUIS OBISPO Reference Map of Census Tracts near Cal Poly 2. Rental costs are high, which drives more students (smaller incomes) to live together in one single family home. Most single-family homes are not designed for four to five adults, especially in terms of bathroom facilities and parking. 3. The City's code enforcement data shows a correlation between high rental areas and reported violations of municipal codes. Some repeated reported violations include: a. Noise, public drunkenness, vandalism and crime b. Property maintenance issues c. Parking 4. Local housing costs are inflated because four to five students can and will pay more for rental housing than the majority of the local workforce, especially those workers in industries with lower wages. This causes many workers to commute, which affects infrastructure (roads), environment (emissions) and society (less owner- occupancy/pride of ownership). These issues are common in many town-gown communities when large student populations move . in to residential neighborhoods; sometimes referred to as "studentification". Studentification is a term coined by Dr. Darren Smith (2002) and is defined as the social and environmental changes caused by a very large number of students living in particular areas of a APPENDIX F: Maintaining Balanced Neighborhoods Page 83 1.a Packet Pg. 98 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) CITY OF S.Hn LUIS OBISPO town or city. It is not necessarily students living in the community, but instead the substitution of a local community by a student community. 1 The City desires to avoid "studentification" in its low-density residential neighborhoods. The following sections identify ideas for potential solutions -including best management practices from nationwide research- to be considered by the Civility Working Group. Potential Solutions Two main focus areas should be (1) increasing neighborhood diversity and (2) enhancing affordable housing options. 1. Increasing Neighborhood Diversity Diversifying neighborhoods means creating a healthy balance of renters and owner-occupants, as well as a mix of resident types (families, students, couples, singles, etc.). Within the context of student housing, limiting concentration of student rentals increases neighborhood diversity. A. Consider a Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP). The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and many other communities facing foreclosure and abandonment issues, instituted an NSP to help troubled neighborhoods rebound. 2 Using a revolving NSP fund, abandoned and foreclosed homes were purchased and then resold at a discounted price to homebuyers in need of assistance. The same philosophy could be implemented in residential neighborhoods to create more opportunities for owner-occupied housing units. Potential NSP elements may include: a. Establish a revolving fund to be used exclusively to purchase single-family homes within targeted neighborhoods (such as Alta Vista and Monterey Heights) as they become available on the open market. b. Resell all homes purchased with the revolving fund within a reasonable time to likely owner-occupants; university staff, faculty or other workforce buyers. c. Evaluate legally permissible mechanisms to perpetuate owner-occupancy, such as a homeowners association (HOA), that are consistent with fair housing provisions of State and Federal laws. Developing a HOA for NSP homes is preferable because the HOA can impose conditions, covenants and agreements that require owner-occupancy of the primary residence for a minimum length of time. d. Proceeds from all home sales would go to replenish the revolving fund. e. Maintain "right of first refusal" granting the NSP the right to re-purchase the home when it is offered for sale. f. The NSP could be established on a limited-term basis, or terminated when owner-occupancy rates for single-family units within targeted neighborhoods reach a certain level that could be seen as self-sustaining. 1 Town and Gown Glossary. http://www.towngownworld.com/towngownglossary.html 2 http: //portal.hud.gov/hudportai/HUD?sr c=/program offices/comm plannlng/communitydevelopment/programs/neighborhoodspg. APPENDIX F: Maintaining Balanced Neighborhoods Page 84 1.a Packet Pg. 99 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) CITY OF S.flnLUIS OBISPO This alternative has complicated legal issues surrounding real property rights, equal protection, and privacy that will require more research if the Civility W orking Group supports further development of a NSP. B. Look for opportunities to create faculty and staff housing in student areas. The College of San Mateo, California, has an award winning 44-unit rental housing development for faculty and staff (College Vista), which offers a first-class living environment with rents at half the market average.3 A local example is the 69-unit Bella Montana workforce housing project located in a neighborhood that is impacted with student rentals immediately adjacent to Cal Poly campus. The ground sublease has a ranking priority hierarchy that encourages purchase by Cal Poly faculty and staff, with a back-up market priority for public education, public agency, other CSU employees, and the general public. In all, there are 24 priority rankings in the sublease with newly recruited Cal Poly faculty receiving the highest priority and the general public receiving the lowest. Bella Montana is different from most condominiums in that the structures are owned by the buyers, while Cal Poly remains the owner of the ground upon which the structure sits and has greater control over the conditions of sale of the condos. C. Evaluate strengthening occupancy restrictions to avoid single-family residential overcrowding. The City of Fort Collins, home to Colorado State University, restricts occupancy in all residential dwelling units (single-family, duplex, and multifamily) to one family and not more than one additional person; or two adults and their dependents, and not more than one additional person, or up to four unrelated persons in a dwelling unit located in an apartment complex containing units which were approved to house four unrelated persons.4 The City of San Luis Obispo's Zoning Regulations prohibit six or more adult occupants in the low-density residential zone without a High Occupancy Use Permit. D. Develop a rental inspection program that checks occupancy. The City of Bloomington, home to Indiana University Bloomington, implemented a Rental Occupancy Program that requires rental property inspection every three to five years to validate current occupancy permits. Occupancy permits allow up to three unrelated adults in single- family zoning districts, and up to five in multi-family zoning districts. 5 The City of Santa Cruz, California adopted a 2010 ordinance that requires all owners of one or more residential rental dwelling units to register with the city and participate in an annual inspection. The Santa Cruz program aims to address unpermitted dwelling units and the renting of spaces not intended for habitation, as well as substandard, overcrowded, unsanitary and unsafe housing conditions that render a housing _unit unfit or unsafe for occupancy.6 The City of San Luis Obispo is currently developing a multifamily rental inspection program to be presented to the public and City Council in late 2014. '.h ttp://www.smccd .edy/accounis/smccd/department s/faclllt les/BestAmerlca nllvlngAwa rd.shtml. 'http://www.fcgov.com/neighborhoodservices/occupancy. php 'http://www.ltgau.org/userAies/flles/CityBrochure-Bioomi ngton.pdf 6 Santa Cruz Residential Rental Inspection Program. http:l!www.cityofsantacruz.com/index.aspx?page=1536. APPENDIX F: Maintaining Balanced Neighborhoods Page 85 1.a Packet Pg. 100 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) CITY OF S.fin LUIS OBISPO E. Work with common interest developments on restrictive leases. In California, courts have allowed homeowners associations to limit or ban rentals in private condominium projects or planned developments. Restrictions against leasing in a common interest development must be shown to be reasonable in order to be enforceable per California Civil Code Sections 711 and 1354. In the case City of Oceanside v. McKenna (1989), the Oceanside court found that restrictions on a publicly subsidized condominium project to require owner-occupancy and forbid the leasing of units was valid. The justification offered by the City and its Community Development Commission was found reasonable since prohibiting leasing would foster the redevelopment goals of providing a stabilized community of owner-occupied units for low and moderate income persons.7 F. Create more on-campus housing. Giving students more opportunities to live on-campus may reduce concentration of students living in nearby low-density residential neighborhoods. Cal Poly and the City have adopted policies that support student housing on-campus, and Cal Poly is planning to build a new 1475-bed campus housing facility soon. Other universities require all freshmen to live on-campus, and some also require that freshmen leave their cars at home the first year. In addition to providing new campus housing, Cal Poly could formally adopt a goal to house a certain percentage of students on campus b y a specified date. 2. Enhancing Affordable Housing Options Creating affordable housing is a local, regional and national objective. Within the context of student housing, creating affordable options means offering more housing types with different cost profiles so that students may avoid overcrowding in single-family residences. A. Create partnerships to achieve common affordable housing goals. Northeastern University, Massachusetts, provides a good example of this approach in its Davenport Commons. The project consists of 125 units of housing for students and staff, 60 affordable owner-occupied townhouses, and 2,100 square feet of retail space. 8 It was a complex project, involving many stakeholders and negotiations including a community benefits package of affordable housing, helping homeowners start a condominium association and providing both technical assistance and education for first-time homebuyers. B. Continue to distribute Good Neighbor guides and update off-campus housing outreach materials. The University of Virginia 9 and the City of Fort Collins10 have developed guides that include tips for finding affordable off-campus housing, advice about the financial responsibilities of living on their own, and behavior expected of a good neighbor and community member. Cal Poly, Cuesta College and the City should update their off-campus housing guides to include affordable housing options in the region. The 7 The Case for Rental Restrictions. http://www.hoa-iaw.com/publicalions/case--rental-restridions.shtml 'http://www.dhkinc.com/Housing/affordable/9703.asp • http://www.itgau.org/userfiles/files/off grounds guide.pdf 10 http://www.fcgov.com/nelghborhoodservlces/pdf/lthandbook.pdf?20081224 APPENDIX F: Maintaining Balanced Neighborhoods Page 86 1.a Packet Pg. 101 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) CITY OF SHU LUIS OBISPO guides should also list reasons why overcrowding in low-density residential housing can adversely affect health and safety of tenants, impact available parking, arid contribute to noise and privacy conflicts. Additional Resources The following four resources come from other town-gown communities that have formed public-private task forces with a similar mission to the Civility W orking Group. Each document contains recommended actions to address issues that often arise from off-campus student living in residential neighborhoods. 1. Central Austin Community Development Corporation. 2005. What Other College Communities Have Done: Examples of Regulatory Actions to Preserve the Single-Family, Residential Character of a Campus Neighborhood. http://centralaustincdc.org/fair affordable housing/west urbana na ccupancy.pdf 2. Rutgers University. 2013. Task Force for Off Campus Issues and Concerns: Final Report and Recommendations. http://studentconduct.rutgers.edu/files/documents/OffCampusTas kForceReport.pdf 3. St. Paul P lanning Commission. May 2012. Student Housing Zoning Study: Report and Recommendations. http://www.stpaul.gov/DocumentCenter/Home/View/20436 4. Temple University. 2012. Final Report of the Community and Student Off Campus Issues and Concerns Task Force. http://w ww.temple.edu/studentaffairs/deanofstudents/documents/StudentComm unityOff CampuslssuesTaskForceFina1ReportforW ebsiteNov2012.pdf The remaining four resources listed below are academic studies and white papers on the issues of studentification and town-gown collaborations. 5. Smith, Darren P. 2005. Studentification: the gentrification factory? http://southwarknotes.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/studentification-darren-smith.pdf 6. Smith, Darren P. 2008. The Politics of Studentification and (Un)balanced Urban Populations: Lessons for Gentrification and Sustainable Communities? http://usj.sagepub.com/content/45/12/2541.full.pdf+html 7. U.K. National HMO Lobby. 2008. Balanced Communities & Studentification: Problems and Solutions. http://www.itgau.org/userfiles/files/Nationai%20HM0%20Lobby.pdf 8. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. 2009. Town-Gown Collaboration in Land Use and Development. http://community-wealth.org/ pdfs/news/recent-articles/11-09/report- sungu-eryilmaz.pdf APPENDIX F: Maintaining Balanced Neighborhoods Page 87 1.a Packet Pg. 102 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort, Final Report | San Luis Obispo, CA Page 28 - Enhancing the quality of life for all residents - 1.a Packet Pg. 103 At t a c h m e n t : a - N e i g h b o r h o o d W e l l n e s s C o m m u n i t y C i v i l i t y R e p o r t F i n a l ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Meeting Date: 12/1/2015 FROM: Chris Staley, Police Captain Prepared By: Christine Wallace, Neighborhood Outreach Manager SUBJECT: ACTION FOR CITY CIVILITY REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve implementation strategies for the City led Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility recommendations; and 2. Make no changes to the City membership of the Student Community Liaison Committee. DISCUSSION Background On May 19, 2015 Council received the Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Report and provided direction to staff to return with implementation strategies for the recommendations detailed in the report. In addition, staff was asked to provide a recommendation to the City Council on the make-up of City representatives on the Student Community Liaison Committee. Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Recommendations The Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Report was presented to Council on May 19, 2015 (Attachment A.) The report is a comprehensive and highly detailed document which was prepared after a two year research process. A wide variety of recommendations were established in the report, with each recommendation matched to the agency/institution that would be responsible for further exploration and action identification. The following are the recommendations for which the City of San Luis Obispo was identified as the lead agency followed by the staff recommended action. Notably, several of the following recommendations have already been addressed in recent Council actions. Objective 1 – Define short-term actions to enhance the quality of life 1. Investigate establishing a Student Neighborhood Assistance Program (SNAP) Ride- Along program and promote current Police Ride-Along program. Action: The San Luis Obispo Police Department Ride-Along program is available to residents of the city and may be scheduled once per year. It is not currently advertised on the City website but consideration is being made for including information in the FAQs section of the Police Department web content. The SNAP program, staffed by part-time temporary employees of the Police Department, is not staffed or structured to support resident ride-alongs. While SNAP employees receive a great deal of training, it would not be appropriate for them to take responsibility for 14 Packet Pg. 200 1.b Packet Pg. 104 At t a c h m e n t : b - C A R C i v i l i t y ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) residents in a ride-along capacity. 2. Explore the option of creating a noise ordinance in public spaces on streets and sidewalks for gatherings of more than 50 people by issuing citations or other alternative options. Action: Not recommended. Chapter 5.80 of the City’s Municipal Code regulates parades and assemblies within the public right-of-way. The City’s Unruly Gathering Ordinance addresses certain gatherings on private property which “spill-out” and obstruct the public right-of-way. Further regulating the ability to gather within traditional public forums could infringe on the public’s right to assemble and/or free speech rights. The amendments made to the Unruly Gathering Ordinance allow the Police Department the ability to more effectively address gatherings that are causing a significant disturbance to a neighborhood. In addition, Penal Code section 415, commonly referred to a “disturbing the peace” addresses some of the unlawful impacts associated with large gatherings. 3. Consider expanding tools to enforce ordinances for nuisance properties including, but not limited to, “tagging” properties that meet a definition of a public nuisance or unruly gatherings in terms of both property-maintenance concerns and behavior issues. Action: Ongoing proactive enforcement by Code Enforcement and the Neighborhood Services Specialists are addressing chronic and nuisance properties. Behavioral issues are addressed by SLOPD in the enforcement of noise and the newly amended Unruly Gathering ordinances and Cal Poly University Police are enforcing municipal code violations (noise, unruly gathering, open container, public urination) in the neighborhoods up to one mile off campus. The Rental Housing Inspection Program will also help better address properties that are lacking basic safety and habitable conditions. All of these efforts should be fully implemented prior to considering another regulation that requires tagging properties that violate certain provisions of the Municipal Code. If the council wishes to pursue this added regulation staff recommends that it be considered after the first full cycle of the Residential Housing Inspection Program. 4. Evaluate policies so that new development or redevelopment does not unduly impact neighborhoods. Action: Action: In progress. Project plan for implementation of General Plan Program 2.13 (Neighborhood Compatibility) to be presented to Council by end of Fiscal Year 2015-2016. Objective Two – Define stakeholders’ needs and success 5. Evaluate best practices and implement strategies to reduce the number of disruptions from parties and noise in neighborhoods (as referenced in Objective Three) Action: Council amended the Unruly Gathering ordinance in August 2015 to strengthen the ordinance as an enforcement tool. Also in August 2015, Council approved the Memorandum of Understanding between the Police Department and 14 Packet Pg. 201 1.b Packet Pg. 105 At t a c h m e n t : b - C A R C i v i l i t y ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Cal Poly University Police (“UPD”) Department allowing UPD the ability to enforce municipal code ordinances up to one mile from campus. SLOPD will continue to evaluate other methods that may help reduce disruptions. 6. Develop and implement a rental housing inspection program. Action: A Rental Housing Inspection Program was adopted by City Council May 19, 2015 and the program is currently in development for phased implementation. Phase 1 – Amnesty to assist in legalizing unpermitted work or existing unpermitted dwelling units starting December 1, 2015. Postcards and flyers will sent out to property owners at the end of November 2015. Phase 2 – Registration of rental units begins January 1, 2016. Information mailed out starting last week of December 2015. Registration deadline will be March 15, 2016. Phase 3 – First Inspection is scheduled for April 2016. 7. Implement educational programs to increase the number of student-aged residents who bring in their trashcans on the same day the trash is picked up. Action: In progress. Neighborhood Services Specialists (NSS) participate in “Walk and Talks” educate residents of the Neighborhood Enhancement Ordinance regulations. NSS conducts proactive enforcement, speaking with residents face to face and using informational stickers that are applied directly to waste wheelers that have not been moved from the street. More challenging locations, such as Hathway Alley, have required a more focused approach from Code Enforcement and Utilities with great success. NSS has also begun outreach to residents at Farmers’ Market on Thursday evenings. 8. Continue to implement strategies to address homelessness in San Luis Obispo particularly in the downtown area). Action: In progress and on-going. SLOPD will continue to work within strongly established community partnerships to provide focused service on identified needs using the Community Action Team (CAT), Downtown Bicycle Officers and patrol services. Engage and collaborated with stakeholders to provide education and awareness opportunities through programs such as the Directed Giving campaign. 9. Implement strategies to reduce traffic issues in neighborhoods. Consider using strategies identified in the Land Use and Circulation Element update to achieve this objective. Action: The City’s Neighborhood Traffic Management (NTM) Program encourages neighborhood residents to work with staff in developing strategies to address identified issues. The objective of the NTM program is to encourage citizens to be directly involved in addressing neighborhood traffic concerns and to provide a process that results in equitable and affordable solutions to the traffic problems in a neighborhood. Neighborhood traffic safety and operational issues on all other streets and intersections fall under the scope of the City’s Annual Traffic Safety and Biennial Traffic Operations Programs. Neighborhood parking issues fall under the scope of the City’s Residential Parking District Program. 14 Packet Pg. 202 1.b Packet Pg. 106 At t a c h m e n t : b - C A R C i v i l i t y ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Objective Three – Identify university/city best practices 10. Work with the City to generate a neighborhood map of housing rental properties and provide outreach to student renters by funding welcome bags for neighbors to distribute to establish positive interactions. Action: Currently, SLOPD Neighborhood Outreach provides rack cards and door hangers to residents wishing to conduct focused outreach to various properties/residents. In addition, the Police Department and Code Enforcement Walk and Talks” are the personal contacts and provision of educational materials to thousands of residents at the beginning of the academic year. Neighborhoods, such as Alta Vista, visit properties annually with a welcome letter sharing information and expectations with new residents. Given limited resources and funding, the City is not in a position to complete this objective. Further discussion to determine program viability is recommended. 11. Create a Renter/Rental Housing Inspection Program Action: See #6 under Objective 2. 12. Implement a Party Registration Program. Develop a program to incentivize party registration that provides the opportunity for the San Luis Obispo Police Department to contact the party registrant and offer a 20-minute warning before dispatching S.N.A.P. or a police officer. Action: Research concept for viability. Analysis of a program that could be created with current resource as well as best practices will be conducted – Fall 2016. 13. Develop proactive engagement of law and code enforcement with visits to properties of concern; “Knock and Talk”. Action: Complete. Neighborhood Officer and Neighborhood Services Specialists Knock and Talks” established in Fall of 2014 and are continuing. Objective Four – Review enforcement best practices 14. City and Cal Poly officials to craft a MOU between the City and University regarding police operational protocol within a one-mile radius of campus. Action: Complete. Council approved the MOU in August 2015. UPD officers were provided training prior to the start of the 2015 academic year and are actively enforcing municipal code violations in the neighborhoods within one mile of campus 15. Partner Cal Poly and Cuesta police officers with San Luis Obispo Neighborhood Officers to coordinate resources and achieve program goals. Action: University Police officers currently partner with SLOPD officers during traditionally busy time periods (start of school, Halloween) as staffing allows. This is 14 Packet Pg. 203 1.b Packet Pg. 107 At t a c h m e n t : b - C A R C i v i l i t y ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) possible wth UPD because the campus is contiguous to the City. The use of Cuesta PD officers is not realistic given Cuesta’s lack of proximity to the City and their resources. 16. Implement a keg registration program. Action: Research practicality of keg registration program – present findings to Council in May 2016. 17. Conduct an internal assessment of the San Luis Obispo Police Department staffing to prepare for growth within the city and on the Cal Poly campus to ensure staffing needs match the population. Action: Staffing assessment, primarily patrol and dispatch, is addressed in the Strategic Plan being developed by the Police Department and will be presented to Council in March 2016. 18. Explore the possibility of Cal Poly Police being able to issue City Municipal Administrative Citations. Action: Established per the MOU (#14 above). Objective Five – Engage stakeholders: review current educational & information efforts 19. Create an annual communications plan containing neighborhood wellness messages and a process for communicating the information effectively to maximize resources Action – Communication plan created for Fall/Winter 2015 by a subcommittee consisting of residents, Cuesta Student Government, Cal Poly staff from Orientation, Housing, Greek Life, Administration and ASI, City Code Enforcement and Neighborhood Outreach. The subcommittee will meet every six months to continue with the planning and delivery of neighborhood wellness messaging to ensure effectiveness. Student Community Liaison Committee Established in 1987, the Student Community Liaison Committee (SCLC) serves as a mechanism of communication between Cal Poly, Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo County and the City of San Luis Obispo. The mission of SCLC is to “proactively engage in discussion to promote positive relations, mutual respect and improved quality of life for all citizens of San Luis Obispo.” Per the current SCLC Memorandum of Understanding, the City provides meeting space, two City Council representatives to include the mayor, who is a voting member, and a rotating council member and three voting members: the City Manager, the Police Chief and the Neighborhood Outreach Manager. (Attachment B) SCLC has been an excellent venue for the agencies to share information and work to improve community relationships. In assessment of the City of San Luis Obispo membership, staff recommends that the voting membership of the Mayor, City Manager, Police Chief and Neighborhood Outreach remain unchanged. As there are times when meeting conflicts arise, the 14 Packet Pg. 204 1.b Packet Pg. 108 At t a c h m e n t : b - C A R C i v i l i t y ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Assistant City Manager, Police Captains and Community Development Director would be asked to attend for coverage and participation. Staff also recommends maintaining the rotating Council Member structure as SCLC provides the opportunity to information sharing and community relationship building. CONCURRENCES The Community Development Department, Public Works, and Finance Department concur with the recommendations for action in this report. FISCAL IMPACT There are no fiscal impacts from the recommendations contained in this report. The Rental Housing Inspection Program was approved in May 2015. Funding for the program was adopted as part of the 2015-2017 Financial Plan. The additional actions recommended in this report will be completed with existing resources. ALTERNATIVE 1. Do not approve recommended actions. Request that staff return with further alternative actions at a later date. Attachments: a - Neighborhood Wellness Report - Final b - SCLC MOU Final 5-16-13 14 Packet Pg. 205 1.b Packet Pg. 109 At t a c h m e n t : b - C A R C i v i l i t y ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) ABC-544 (9/96) IMPACT Informed Merchants Preventing Alcohol-Related Crime Tendencies State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Beer Keg Registration 25659.5. Beer keg registration. (a) Retail licensees selling keg beer for consumption off licensed premises shall place an identification tag on all kegs of beer at the time of sale and shall require the signing of a receipt for the keg of beer by the purchaser in order to allow kegs to be traced if the contents are used in violation of this article. The keg identification shall be in the form of a numbered label prescribed and supplied by the department that identifies the seller. The receipt shall be on a form prescribed and supplied by the department and shall include the name and address of the purchaser and the purchaser’s driver’s license number or equivalent form of identification number. A retailer shall not return any deposit upon the return of any keg that does not have the identification label required pursuant to subdivision (a). (b) Any licensee selling keg beer for off premise consumption who fails to require the signing of a receipt at the time of sale and fails to place a numbered identification label on the keg shall be subject to disciplinary action pursuant to this division. The licensee shall retain a copy of the receipt, which shall be retained on the licensed premise for a period of six months. The receipt records shall be available for inspection and copying by the Department or other authorized law enforcement agency. (c) Possession of a keg containing beer with knowledge that the keg is not identified as required by subdivision (a) is a misdemeanor. (d) Any purchaser of keg beer who knowingly provides false information as required by subdivision (a) is guilty of a misdemeanor. (e) The identification label required pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be constructed of material and made attachable in such a manner as to make the label easily removable for the purpose of cleaning and reusing the keg by a beer manufacturer. (f) The Department is authorized to charge a fee not to exceed the actual cost of supplying receipt forms and identification labels required pursuant to subdivision (a). Fees collected pursuant to this subdivision shall be deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund. (g) As used in this section, “keg” means any brewery-sealed, individual container of beer having a liquid capacity of six gallons or more. Source: California Business and Professions Code 1.c Packet Pg. 110 At t a c h m e n t : c - A B C 5 4 4 F o r m s ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) ABC-544 (9/96) Proper Placement of Identification Tag 1.c Packet Pg. 111 At t a c h m e n t : c - A B C 5 4 4 F o r m s ( 1 2 9 9 : K e g R e g i s t r a t i o n ) Keg Registration April 19, 2016 Recommendation: Staff recommends to not move forward with a municipal keg registration program and to focus efforts on outreach and enforcement. Neighborhood Wellness Community Civility Report Objective Four: Review Enforcement Best Practices Action: Implement a keg registration program Desired outcome: A reduction in underage alcohol use and an accountability mechanism for persons who serve minors State of California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control Keg regulatory provisions: Business & Professions Code Division 9, Chapter 16 Section 25659.5 State of California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control Tag affixed to the keg Log book receipt, stays with retailer Keg Retail – Average Sales Cork & Bottle – 10 kegs per week Campus Bottle – 15 kegs per week BevMo – 10 kegs per week Current Trends •Survey electronically distributed to Cal Poly & Cuesta College students •1,451 respondents •“Social gathering” defined as a gathering that is pre-planned and may have the potential for noise. Examples: birthday parties, theme parties (i.e. Halloween), club gatherings, Greek events, athletic team gatherings, & group video gaming. Q13 Have you ever attended an off-campus social gathering where keg beer was served? Answered: 1,289 Skipped: 162 Yes No I don't know. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Yes 70.99% 915 No 26.92% 347 I don't know. 2.09% 27 Total 1,289 Q15 Have you ever purchased a keg of beer for a social gathering? Answered: 1,288 Skipped: 163 Yes No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Yes 22.28% 287 No 77.72% 1,001 Total 1,288 State & National Data •No data for successful municipal keg programs •States with strict alcohol policies have lower underage consumption rates Enforcement •T.R.A.C.E. •Minor Decoy/Shoulder Tap •Social Host •Unruly Gathering •Minor in Possession •SLO County Drug & Alcohol Services •Cal Poly Health Services •Student Community Success Program •New Student Orientation •Aware Awake Alive Education Questions? Staff recommends to not move forward with a municipal keg registration program and to focus efforts on outreach and enforcement. Recommendation Recap