HomeMy WebLinkAboutARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES 2006ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
COMMISSION
MINUTES
2006
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
January 9, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Charles
Stevenson, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Zeijka Howard
Absent: None
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Associate Planner Tyler Corey, Natural
Resource Manager Neil Havlik and Recording Secretary Jill Francis
ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 1618, 1626, 1638, 1642, 1650 Woodland Drive 1850 and 1860 Wilding Lane.
ARC 231-05; Review of building footprints and tree removals required for house
construction on lots 1 through 7 of the Bowden Ranch development; R -1-S zone;
Bowden Ranch, LP applicant.
Associate Planner Tyler Corey, presented the staff report, recommending approval of
the tree removals on Lots 1-6, with the exception of one oak tree on lot 6; continue
review of the building footprints for lots 2, 6 and 7 to a date uncertain, and denial of all
tree removals on Lot 7 at this time until a revised building footprint is approved; and
provide architectural design direction for the proposed homes with final development
plans for each lot returning to the ARC for review and approval.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Carol Florence, applicant's representative, requested a change to the recommendation,
which would allow for the removal of the eucalyptus trees on lot 7 and one oak on lot 6,
noting that other trees can be added. She described the conclusions of the light analysis
that had been prepared by Thoma Electric.
Hamish Marshall, applicant, agreed with the change to the request, and asked for
project approval.
Stan Canby, project architect, explained that the 6 to 12% slope on all lots (except lot 1)
dictates where the entrances will be, and noted that the homes will appear to be single -
story from Woodland.
ARC Minutes
January 9, 2006
Page 2
Andy Mangano, applicant, 735 Tank Farm Road, explained that EDA had prepared a
new topographic survey to reflect grading changes that have occurred. He added that
bonus rooms were proposed at the basement level to take advantage if the sloping
topography.
Wendy Brown, 1865 Wilding, expressed concerns with a perceived change from more
custom lot designs to a more standard "tract" development. She expressed a desire to
see designs with more architectural integrity.
Heather Billing, 2001 Skylark, agreed with Ms. Brown and suggested that there be a
range of house sizes and styles similar to those seen in the existing neighborhood.
Richard Hendricks, 1643 Woodland, was concerned that tree removals would
exacerbate light impacts from Taylor Field, as well as potentially impact raptors and
Monarch butterflies.
Natural Resources Manager, Neil Havlik, answered questions on tree removals, noting
that the butterflies would be attracted to other trees besides the eucalyptus.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Tree Removals
- Commr. Lopes asked about replacement trees for those trees removed that are over 6
inches in diameter. He also questioned the increased light coming from
Taylor Field because of the tree removals, acknowledging that the new houses would
block some of the light. He suggested that additional trees be planted in front yard
areas beyond required street tress to soften the home designs.
Commr. Smith asked about the trees next to the creek corridor, and if the house design
will be the same style for homes on all the lots.
Commr. Stevenson supported the proposed tree removals.
Commr. Wilhelm asked if individual house designs will be reviewed by the Commission,
which staff conformed would be the case.
Commr. Boudreau felt the replacement trees will reduce light emanating from the
athletic fields, add shade, and help the environment, and supported staffs
recommendation.
A condition of approval was discussed regarding replacement plantings at a 1:1 ratio for
any trees removed that are over 6" diameter at breast height or larger with three of the
replacement trees to be planted on Lots 1-7. (two trees on the rear of sites to enhance
the wooded character of the riparian corridor and surrounding area, and to provide
screening of lighting at Taylor Field, and one tree to add to the project's streetscape
appeal).
ARC Minutes
January 9, 2006
Page 3
AYES: Commrs. Boudreau, Root, Wilhelm, Stevenson, Lopes, Smith and Howard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Building Footprints
Commr. Stevenson questioned the size of houses versus lot size. He wanted to see
scaling devices used in the home designs to reduce the apparent massing and smaller -
scale homes on Lots 1 and 2. He also suggested looking into secondary dwelling units
on some lots.
Commr. Wilhelm felt the proposed house designs should have different sizes and styles
and suggested the architects meet with the surrounding neighborhood to review scaling
devices and architectural styles and designs to reduce the apparent massing of
proposed structures to help achieve consensus on the lot designs.
Commr. Lopes agreed that the house sizes should vary.
Commr. Smith supported the proposal as presented.
Commr. Root preferred a wide variety of styles and designs with the potential for an
added guest house or granny unit as a option to buyers.
2. 562 Sandercock Street. ARC 202-05; Review of the design for a 5 -unit residential
condominium development, including a 25% density bonus for affordable housing;
R-2 zone; Mike Sathre, applicant.
Associate Planner Tyler Corey, presented the staff report, recommending continuance
to date uncertain with specific direction on changes to incorporate into the site plan and
elevations for final approval.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Aaron Gannage, applicant's representative, spoke in support of the request, noting he
will look into changes to the placement or need for a trash enclosure.
There were no further comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Discussion focused on details of the building designs.
ARC Minutes
January 9, 2006
Page 4
Commr. Smith questioned the density, which staff then clarified
Commr. Lopes expressed concerns with elements proposed in project buildings that
may not be in keeping with the neighborhood. He suggested that more vertical
elements be used in the windows of the garages of the front building to mimic the
windows on the second story, and adding a covering above the entry to Unit 5.
Chair Howard questioned the location of the trash enclosure.
Commr. Wilhelm felt the east elevation of the front wall should contain additional
articulation similar to the other walls and suggested consideration of adding a walkway
to unit 5.
Commr. Boudreau suggested the use of exposed rafter tails.
Commr. Stevenson had suggestions on stealth dormer vents.
- AYES:
Commrs. Boudreau, Root, Wilhelm, Howard, Smith, Lopes & Stevenson
NOES:
None
— ABSENT:
None
ABSTAIN:
None
The motion carried on a 7-0 vote.
3. Staff
A. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
4. Commission:
A.. Minutes of December 5, and December 19, 2005
The minutes were approved as submitted.
B. Recent Project Review
Commr. Lopes brought up the following items:
1. 857 Higuera — asked staff to verify whether the green color of the remodeled space
to accommodate the new sushi restaurant was consistent with the approved colors
board. Pam Ricci indicated that the project planner would confirm that the
completed project was consistent with approvals when he completed the blue card
inspection.
ARC Minutes
January 9, 2006
Page 5
2. Bowden Ranch — asked staff about the unsightly appearance of a retaining wall.
Tyler Corey responded that the treatment of the wall and landscaping around it
would be brought to the ARC for review and approval.
3. Tract 2570 at 2070 Fixlini (City File #s ER/TR 95-03) — raised a concern with the
height of a fence for a detention basin. Tyler Corey noted that he is working with
the Public Works Department on an appropriate solution.
4. 1601 Osos — raised concerns with changes made to the building and new signage
added to a salon. Pam Ricci indicated that she would find out if permits were
obtained for the changes.
5. 705 Higuera — asked about the business being open before all exterior changes had
been completed. Pam Ricci responded that she would look into it, but that it is
probably a case where the business was allowed to reopen while finish work was
being completed.
Commr. Howard mentioned that she was disappointed with the interior of the new
County Government Center and that the storefront system of Urban Outfitters looked
too dark.
Commr. Stevenson asked staff about the ARC reviewing plans for the Dalidio property
in order that the Commission's input on design could be considered by the ad-hoc
committee discussing project alternatives. Pam Ricci indicated that she understood the
motivations for the ARC providing input, but pointed out that there were logistical and
jurisdictional issues since the project was not a current City project. She noted that the
City had sent a detailed letter to the County Planning Department outlining the City's
concerns with the project that she would distribute to the ARC. She also told the ARC
that she would provide more information on the possibilities of their reviewing the
project after conferring with other staff.
Commr. Smith mentioned an article that had recently been in the L.A. Times providing
an opinion about the merits of the design review process. Pam Ricci mentioned that
she also had a copy of the letter and would provide copies to the ARC.
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business the meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m. to the regular meeting of
the ARC scheduled for January 23 2006, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Hearing Room of
City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
January 23, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Charles
Stevenson, Jim Lopes, and Chairperson Zeijka Howard
Absent: Commrs. Lopes and Smith
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Associate Planner Jaime Hill, Recording
Secretary Jill Francis
ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as amended.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 3580 Sacramento Drive. ARC 197-05; Review of a mixed use project; M zone;
Quaglino properties, applicant. (Jaime Hill)
Associate Planner Jaime Hill presented the report recommending final approval of the
project, based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements, which she
outlined.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Steve Pults, applicant's representative, indicated that he supported the stafrs
recommendation for approval, but had some minor changes he would like to make to
conditions. He asked that: the condition regarding bike racks be rephrased; 12 -foot
high poles be used for parking lot lights; the trash enclosure not be relocated; and the
two pine trees in the street yard be removed.
Steve Caminiti, Landscape Architect, spoke in support of the request and explained the
landscape scheme for the street yard area with the 24 sycamore trees and red fescue.
Don Hedrick, 3661 Sacramento Dr., SLO., expressed his concerns that residences were
inappropriate in this industrial area and that it would be prudent to wait until the Broad
Street Mixed -Use project across the street was occupied so that its functionality could
be assessed. Mr. Hedrick had submitted two letters to the Commission; the first, dated
January 4, 2006, was included in the ARC's agenda packets, and the second, dated
January 23, 2006, was distributed to the ARC just prior to the hearing.
ARC Minutes
January 23, 2006
Page 2
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Overall, the Commission supported the project site plan and building designs, though
several of the Commissioners did express concern regarding the appropriateness of
residential uses in industrial areas.
Commr. Stevenson questioned if the carports would be reserved for residents, which
Jaime Hill noted could not be done because a parking reduction had been approved for
the project. He discussed a concern with the possible noise generated by open roll -up
doors. He noted his support for this project and its architecture, but expressed
reservations with the concept of mixed-use projects in industrial zones.
Commr. Boudreau asked about the heights of retaining walls, and expressed support for
the mixed-use project provided that future residents are advised of potential noise
problems.
Commr. Wilhelm questioned the placement of the buildings in relationship to the
retaining walls. He discussed parking requirements and felt the mixed-use has the best
potential for providing affordable housing.
Commr. Root discussed the type of potential residents living with the mixed-use and the
pros and cons they should expect.
On motion by Commr. Wilhelm to grant approval to the project with revisions to the
conditions regarding lighting and tree removals. Seconded by Commr Root
AYES: Commrs. Stevenson, Boudreau, Wilhelm, Root and Howard
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Lopes and Smith
ABSTAIN: None
The motion passed on a 5:0 vote.
2. Staff
A. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
3. Commission:
A.. Minutes: January 9, 2006
The minutes of January 9, 2006, were approved as amended.
ARC Minutes
January 23, 2006
Page 3
B. Recent Project Review- Lessons Learned
There was discussion on whether or not the Commission should review all garage
conversions. It was decided that the pending project that staff mentioned would be
reviewed by the full ARC, but that there would be guidelines established in the future to
direct staff on when conversions could be approved as a Director's -level review.
Pam Ricci provided copies to the Commission of a recent LA Times article on the
design review process. She also explained why it was not appropriate for the
Commission to review the Dalidio project at this time. She provided the Commissioners
with a copy of a letter that had been sent to the County Planning Department from the
Community Development Director regarding the project.
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m. to
the regular meeting of the ARC scheduled for February 6, 2006, at 5:00 p.m., in the
Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording .Secretary
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
- February 6, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commrs. Allen Root, Jim Lopes, David Smith, Charles Stevenson, Vice -
Chair Michael Boudreau, and Chairman Zeljka Howard
Absent: Commr. Wilhelm
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore and
Recording Secretary Jill Francis
ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 1015 Court Street. ARC MI 201-05; Review of a facade remodel to the Thai
Palace Restaurant; C -D -H zone; Teerapan Teertarkul, applicant. (continued from
December 19, 2005 - To be continued to February 21, 2006) (Pam Ricci)
This item was continued without discussion because of an error in the notification
process, and to update the description of this portion of the project.
2. 1063 Ella Street. ARC 74-05; Review of the demolition or relocation of a house,
and construction of residential condominiums; R-2 zone; (Continued from
December, 2005) Brian Rolph, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report, recommending final
approval to the project design, based on findings and subject to conditions which he
outlined.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Brian Rolph, applicant, spoke in support of his request, and discussed the retaining
walls, trash enclosure, and grading relating to the retaining walls. The layout including
pedestrian access was discussed.
An e-mail from adjacent neighbor Barry Williams was read into the record regarding his
support for the latest set of project plans.
ARC Minutes
February 6, 2006
Page 2
There were no further comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS
Commission discussion focused on grading and drainage and the design and location of
the trash enclosure. The Commission added some language to the condition regarding
the trash enclosure design calling for ornamental doors and asked staff to provide a
clear finding as to why the trash enclosure was allowed in the street yard here because
of the unique site circumstances including the steep topography and overhead power
lines. Overall the Commission was pleased with the changes made by the applicant to
respond to direction and complimented the applicant on how far the project had
progressed since it was initially submitted
Commr. Lopes asked about pedestrian accessibility and provisions for common open
space areas.
Commr. Root had concerns with the landscape plan, the size of the trash enclosures,
and suggested the language regarding the roll -up doors be deleted from the trash
enclosure condition.
Commr. Stevenson questioned site drainage, and expressed concern with the location
of trash enclosure.
Commr. Smith asked for specifics relating to the retaining walls.
Commr. Boudreau clarified the width of the rafters as four by.
On motion by Commr. Smith to -grant final approval to the project design deleting the
AYES: Commrs. Root, Boudreau, Howard, Stevenson, Lopes and Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commr. Wilhelm
ABSTAIN: None
The motion passed on a 6:0 vote.
3. 1160 Leff Street. ARC 1-04; Review of a new 4 -unit senior housing project; R-3
zone; De La Rosa Properties, LLC, applicant (Jaime Hill)
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report, recommending the item be
continued to a date uncertain with direction regarding changes to the overall design of
the project to be consistent with City policy and standards.
There was discussion relating to problems with parking location and building access.
ARC Minutes
February 6, 2006
Page 3
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Michael Maglinte, applicant, spoke in support of his request.
There were no further comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS
The Commission felt that the project needed to better relate to the street and suggested
that there be entries facing the street with pedestrian pathways.
Commr. Boudreau expressed concerns with building access from the street and the
style of architecture, noting that the scale of the project should be addressed.
Commr. Root discussed pedestrian pathways and walk-up design.
Commr. Stevenson voiced concerns with the location of garage doors and layout of
courtyard, and suggested the configuration be changed.
Commr. Smith had concerns with neighborhood compatibility.
Commr. Lopes expressed that the Commission needs to adhere to City policies when
looking at the design of this project; suggested several changes to the project; and
noted that the historical aspect should be considered.
On motion by Commr. Stevenson to continue discussion to a date uncertain with details
about changes to the site plan to make parking a less prominent feature of the project
(out of the front yard) and to make project buildings less massive looking to better
integrate them with the neighborhood, consistent with staff's recommended direction
Seconded by Commr. Boudreau.
AYES: Commrs. Root, Boudreau, Howard, Stevenson, Lopes and Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commr. Wilhelm
ABSTAIN: None
The motion passed on a vote 6:0.
4. 2244 Flora Street. ARCMI 203-05; Review of a new 3,716 square foot single-
family residence; R-1 zone; Chris Richardson, applicant. (Brian Leveille)
Senior Planner Pam Ricci presented the staff report, recommending final approval
based on findings and subject to conditions which she outlined.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
ARC Minutes
February 6, 2006
Page 4
Heidi Gibson, project architect, used an exhibit showing the original and modified front
elevations to show how the building had been reduced in floor area and its height
lowered to respond to concerns voiced by City staff and the surrounding neighborhood.
She also presented a model of the project which she used as a tool to illustrate how the
project respected the adjacent creek area and sloping topography. The model also
showed the stepping of building areas and the use of varied roof forms. She explained
that the tallest portions of the building were purposely placed behind the existing tallest
trees where views from the neighbors' properties would be already obscured.
Debra Cleere, 1804 Viewmont Street, expressed concerns with the overall size of the
proposed house and that its footprint was substantially larger than other nearby homes.
She also pointed out flooding issues with the adjacent creek.
Nancy Reed, 2303 Sunset Drive, noted that she would like to see the Bay Laurel trees
retained.
Lisa Peron, 1770 Viewmont Drive, was concerned with flooding and potential impacts to
the creek area.
Judy Jennings, 1828 Viewmont Street, expressed concerns with the scale of the
development proposal.
Warren Lawry, 2250 Flora Street, pointed out that the proposed house is much larger
than other nearby homes.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
After the public hearing was closed, the ARC discussed the dilemma when a new larger
home is proposed in the middle of a developed neighborhood. The Commission was
convinced that the architect had done a good job of designing a home that respected
site constraints, was stepped and articulated to reduce its apparent mass, and provided
view corridors for neighbors. However, the Commission acknowledged that the house,
even in its unique context of large homes on a private roadway, was very large. They
asked the length of the footprint be reduced by another 7 feet (creating a required 15 -
foot eastern side yard setback) and that techniques to further reduce the height of the
center portion of the house be further explored, while maintaining the same stepped and
varied rooflines .
Commr. Root noted incorrect language regarding landscaping; asked if there were
different requirements for street landscaping on a private street; questioned which trees
were to be removed and which would stay; and noted concerns with flooding issues.
Commr. Stevenson questioned the area of the building footprint; noted the design and
size of the garage could be slightly modified; and noted concerns with flooding.
ARC Minutes
February 6, 2006
Page 5
/ Commr. Lopes also had concerns with the square footage of the building footprint,
complemented the design, but felt the size of the middle portion could be altered.
Commr. Smith had no problems with the design since it meets City requirements.
Commr. Boudreau felt the architect had done an excellent job of softening the building
scale and supported staff's recommendation for approval.
Commr. Howard agreed that the project design meets the City's requirements.
On motion by Commr. Stevenson to -grant final approval, with a condition re-guirina a 15 -
AYES: Commrs. Root, Boudreau, Howard, Stevenson, Lopes, Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commr. Wilhelm
ABSTAIN: None
The motion passed by a 6:0 vote.
COMMENT & DISCUSSION:
4. Staff:
A. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci provided a forecast of items expected on the next meeting agenda. She
reminded the Commission that this meeting was on Tuesday night because of the City
holiday on Monday the 20th for Presidents' Day. She noted that the Commission would
be meeting in the Planning Conference Room that night because there would also be a
Council meeting that evening. Commr. Root noted that he would be absent that night.
She provided the Commission with a memo listing some of the more prominent projects
that they had reviewed and approved in 2005. She explained that this list would be
forwarded to the City Clerk as the ARC's annual accomplishments for the upcoming
advisory body dinner on March 16th. The Commission also provided a list of the 5 most
important projects that they have worked on as requested by the City Clerk in
conjunction with the upcoming sesquicentennial celebration.
Planner Ricci also noted that there would be a dedication ceremony for the new public
art pieces at the Damon -Garcia Sports Fields on March 21 st at noon which the ARC was
invited to attend.
5. Commission:
ARC Minutes
February 6, 2006
Page 6
A. Minutes: January 23, 2006 (amend or approve)
The minutes of January 23, 2006 were approved as submitted.
B. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned
Chairperson Howard asked staff to look into whether installed plant materials
(landscaping) around the new carwash at the corner of Broad and Tank Farm were
consistent with ARC -approved plans. Pam Ricci told the Commission that there would
be follow-up from staff reporting on this question.
There was- general discussion about issues with double-check valve assemblies in
visible street yard areas of projects. It was agreed that if the devices are to be placed in
prominent and visible locations that they needed to be screened and that the locations
and techniques for screening them need to be a part of plans that the ARC reviews.
Pam Ricci told the Commission that ARC checklists already include a requirement that
this information be a part of plans. She added that sometimes decisions regarding the
installation of the devices occur in the field that may not be consistent with plans. She
assured the ARC that the City departments are working together to address the issue
and keep it from happening in the future.
Commr. Lopes asked about the glare produced from the lights at the school's sports
field and questioned if there was anything that could be done to address this concern.
Pam Ricci noted that she would look into it.
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:35
p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for Tuesday, February 21, 2006, at 5:00
p.m. in the Planning Conference Room, lower level of City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
February 21, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Michael Boudreau, David Smith, Jim
Lopes, and Chairperson Zeijka Howard
Absent: Commrs. Stevenson and Root
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Principal Administrative Analyst
Betsy Kaiser and Recording Secretary Jill Francis
ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 1015 Court Street: ARCMI 201-05; Review of column details in conjunction with
an approved facade remodel to the Thai Palace Restaurant; C -D -H zone; Teerapan
Teeratarkul, applicant (continued from February 6, 2006) (Pam Ricci)
Senior Planner Pam Ricci presented the staff report, recommending approval of the
column details and asking for any direction on desired changes or additional
requirements.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Stephen Barasch, applicant's representative, presented documentation and sample
tiles, noting the tiles will be sealed for protection from the weather and to deter graffiti.
There were no comments made from the public
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Boudreau questioned the number of columns there would be and asked for
specifics about the exterior design.
Commr. Lopes questioned the applicant about the final design versus the architectural
drawing.
Commr. Wilhelm questioned the measurements and distance between columns.
be
ARC Minutes
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
Page 2
the border of the face and returns of the columns would be smooth and a gold color.
Seconded by Commr. Smith,
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Boudreau, Howard, Lopes, Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Root and Stevenson
ABSTAIN: None
The motion passed on a 5:0 vote.
2. 174 Suburban Street. ARC 200-05; Review of a new warehouse and office
building: C -S -S zone; Idler & Rodgers, applicant. (To be continued to March 6,
2006)
This item was continued to March 6, 2006, without discussion, to allow staff time to
review changes to the site plan and landscape plan.
3. 1316 Beach Street. ARCPA 3-06; Review to relocate public art to Emerson Park;
P -F -H zone; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Pam Ricci)
Principal Administrative Analyst Betsy Kiser, presented the staff report, recommending
the Commission find that the relocation site proposed for the public art benches entitled
"Community's Bridge" meets the City's Guidelines for Public Art, and recommend the
City Council approve the relocation.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Commission concluded that the proposed location was far superior to the last two
locations proposed, and that it was consistent with their direction to have adequate
space around the benches and a location where the benches fit in with the theme of the
surrounding facilities.
recommend that the City Council approve the relocation Seconded by Commr.
Boudreau .
AYES: Commrs. Boudreau, Wilhelm, Howard, Smith and Lopes
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Root and Stevenson
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried on a 5-0 vote.
V
ARC Minutes
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
Page 3
4. Staff
Palm/Morro Office/Parking Structure at 919 Palm Street (ARC 193-01): In
response to a memo regarding brick colors, Senior Planner Pam Ricci presented the
commission with sample bricks and discussed the colors they represented.
The Commission asked that the architect come back with some specific ideas for
demarcating the boundary between the two brick colors and techniques for creating
further differentiation and articulation in the elevation. The ARC noted that the approved
elevations showed more reveals and joints in the wall planes than the building as
constructed does. The majority of the Commission seemed to feel that there were some
fairly simple fixes available that could address the concerns.
Craig Smith, representative for Mark Rawson, applicant, was available for questions
and concerns.
Commr. Smith asked staff what their suggestion for correction is.
Commr. Lopes questioned the builder's options for correcting design/colors. He would
like to see a change in plane between the brick at the two adjacent brick sections which
is a different color and suggested that the concerns be presented to the applicant with
the possibility of adding a pilaster strip or other treatment.
Commr. Wilhelm felt the existing tile is a improvement over the approved tile and would
like to see a demarcation between the two colors of brick.
Commr. Boudreau suggested that staff see actual tiles instead of drawings in future.
The other members of the commission agreed.
It was the consensus of the Commission for this item to be continued for further
discussion of possible changes to the original project approval
B. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
5. Commission:
A. Minutes of February6, 2006
The minutes of February 6, 2006 were approved as amended.
B. Recent Project Review- Lessons Learned
Chairperson Howard brought up the remodel of the 962 Monterey building for Urban
Outfitters. She mentioned that the green sign looked garish. Commr. Wilhelm stated
that the dark steel of the 1 -beams comes across as looking industrial.
ARC Minutes
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
Page 4
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m. to
the regular meeting of the ARC scheduled for March 6, 2006, at 5:00 p.m., in the
Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
%
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
March 6, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Charles
Stevenson, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Zeijka Howard
Absent: None
Staff: Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore, Planning Technician Brian Leveille and
Recording Secretary Jill Francis
ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as amended with items 2 and 3 switching order.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 2932 Augusta Street ARC 159-05; Review of 9 residential condos; R-4 zone;
Steno -Wolf Associates, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore, presented the staff report, recommending final
approval to the design of the condominium project, based on findings and subject to
conditions which he outlined.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Garth Kornreich, applicant, spoke in support of the project and discussed the textured
path, roofing tiles, shutters to be added, common open -space, and trash enclosure.
There were no further comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Commission discussed the location of the trash enclosure in detail and determined
that the enclosure should be moved to the side of the driveway instead of in front of the
units at the edge of the street. They asked that the accent color on the trim and garage
doors be reduced from a dark brown to a light brown or buckskin color. A condition to
require authentic clay tiles was deleted and Commissioners instead allowed for a
cement roof tile with variable colors.
Commr. Lopes questioned staff on the details of the trash enclosure and did not support
its proposed location. He suggested changing the tree type used in the front of the
project.
ARC Minutes
March 6, 2006
Page 2
Commr. Stevenson asked if a variance was needed for the trash enclosure location and
suggested the colors be softened.
Commr. Wilhelm questioned the slope degree and treatment/cut of the rafter tails on the
underside of the eaves.
Commr. Smith discussed the driveway material with the applicant.
Commr. Boudreau discussed with the applicant the materials used for the trash
enclosure.
Commr. Root asked about the raised deck located near the retaining wall.
buckskin color, the condition to require authentic clay tiles be deleted while allowing for
a cement roof tile with variable colors, and relocate the trash enclosure and modify its
design.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Boudreau, Howard, Stevenson, Lopes & Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The motion passed on a 7:0 vote.
2. 174 Suburban Road. ARC 200-05; Review of a new warehouse and office building;
C -S -S zone; Idler & Rodgers, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Commissioner Stevenson stepped down from participation due to a potential conflict of
interest.
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore, presented the staff report recommending final
approval, based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Mike Peachey, applicant's representative, discussed the need for shade trees and the
change to side yard with added landscaping.
There were no other comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Root asked staff for a definition of the shade coverage requirement.
Commr. Lopes questioned the parking needed and asked the applicant if different roof
lines could be applied.
ARC Minutes
March 6, 2006
Page 3
Commr. Smith had concerns with the overhang on the east elevation.
Commr. Wilhelm questioned the materials used for the trash enclosure.
On a motion by Commr. Root to approve the design of the new warehouse building
with minor changes to the roof features and to included a provision to require a cupola
feature to break the mass of the roof into the condition to amend the roof features of the
building. Seconded by Commr. Boudreau.
AYES: Commrs. Boudreau, Root, Wilhelm, Howard, Smith and Lopes
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Commr. Stevenson
The motion carried on a 6:0 vote
3. 1386 Oceanaire Drive. ARC 4-06; Review of a proposed conversion of garage to
living space; R-1 zone; Craig & Heidi Rodgers, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Planning Technician Brian Levelle presented the staff report, recommending approval of
the project, based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Craig and Heidi McNichols, applicants, spoke in support of their project
Brett Cross, 1217 Oceanaire Drive, felt that tree removals should be discussed in
greater detail before any approvals are granted for the project.
There were no further comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commissioners Howard and Stevenson expressed concerns with the number of
bedrooms and the conversion of the side loaded garage, noting that the conversion will
result in the construction of a new front loaded garage, which includes the loss of
additional parking area in the driveway.
Commr. Lopes questioned the width of the garage.
Commr. Smith asked if features from the house would be carried to the addition.
Lonaition i Dv removing the requirement for revised concrete flatwork provided that
appropriate potted landscaping is added along the west wall of the converted garage
ARC Minutes
March 6, 2006
Page 4
and landscaping is installed along the newly installed driveway: Condition 4 modified to
allow the removal of the palm tree at the front of the property provided a suitable
replacement tree is installed to the satisfaction of the City Arborist: and Condition 5
added to note that windows and corner trim shall match the existing residence.
Seconded by Commr. Wilhelm.
AYES: Commrs. Boudreau, Root, Wilhelm, Smith and Lopes
NOES: Commrs. Stevenson and Howard
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried on a 5:2 vote.
4. Staff
A. Agenda Forecast
Phil Dunsmore gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
5. Commission:
A. Minutes of February 21, 2006
The minutes of February 21, 2006 were approved as amended.
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m. to
the regular meeting of the ARC scheduled for March 20, 2006, at 5:00 p.m., in the
Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
C-
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
March 20, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Allen Root, David Smith, Charles Stevenson, Jim Lopes
and Chairperson Zeijka Howard
Absent: Commrs. Greg Wilhelm and Vice -Chairperson Michael Boudreau
Staff: Interim Deputy Director Pam Ricci, Associate Planner Jaime Hill, Principal
Administrative Analyst Betsy Kaiser, Natural Resources Manager Neil
Havlik, and Recording Secretary Jill Francis
ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as amended, with item 4 being considered first and item 2
being continued to April 17, 2006, without discussion.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 1413 Calle Joaquin. ARC 9-06; Review of frontage landscaping for expansion of
the Auto Park and on-site grading, Kelly Gearhart, applicant (Phil Dunsmore)
Interim Deputy Director Pam Ricci presented the staff report recommending final
approval to the design of the landscape plan for the Calle Joaquin right-of-way, based
on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements which she outlined.
Natural Resources Manager Neil Havlik discussed the types of trees that would be least
affected by the wind and would not block the long-range views of the hills to the west.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Jaime Kirk, applicant, spoke in support of the project, and described how the landscape
plans were developed to soften views of the project from Highway 101.
There were no other public comments.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Lopes asked if a visual analysis or photo simulations had been prepared; was
concerned that views from Highway 101 would be obstructed; discussed possible future
changes to the grading plan; had concerns that a visual analysis had not been done;
and suggested a change to the spacing of the trees.
ARC Minutes
March 20, 2006
Page 2
Commr. Stevenson discussed the types of trees proposed and the potential for
protecting them from the wind. He felt the proposed car lots are the negative aspect of
the project and the trees and landscaping are the positive aspect.
Commr. Root asked staff for more details on the trees requested.
Commr. Smith had concerns about possible changes with zoning and supported the
idea of additional screening and tree groupings.
The Commission spent considerable time discussing a mix of trees and plantings that
would properly balance the competing objectives of providing foreground screening
along the Highway 101 corridor, maintaining long-range view corridors of the Irish Hills
and Morros to the west, and giving car retailers some visibility from the highway.
Ultimately techniques such as clustering trees and having tree species of varying forms
were employed to meet objectives.
AYES: Commrs. Root, Howard, Stevenson, Lopes and Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Wilhelm and Boudreau
ABSTAIN: None
The motion passed on a 5:0 vote.
2. 2238 Broad Street ARC 62-05; Conceptual review of new — mixed use
development project with 91 residential units and 25,000 sq, ft. commercial space;
C -N -H zone; Halferty Development Co., applicant (To be continued to April 17,
2006) (Brian Leveille)
This item was continued to April 17, 2006, without discussion, to allow time to complete
the initial study of environmental impact and to receive further input from Caltrans and
the Public Works Department on the right-of-way configuration and overall circulation
plan.
3. 625 Toro Street ARC 176-05; Conceptual review of a 7 -unit condominium
development including removal of street parking; R-4 zone; Namaji Enterprise,
applicant. (Jaime Hill)
Associate Planner Jaime Hill presented the staff report, recommending continuance to a
date uncertain with direction regarding changes to the overall design of the project to be
consistent with City policy and standards, with final development plans returning to the
ARC for review and approval.
ARC Minutes
March 20, 2006
Page 3
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Kim Hatch, applicant's representative, gave an overview of the project, and discussed
the proposed trash enclosures.
Glen Norkus, Toro Street, spoke in support of the project, noting he liked the project and
the idea of detached units.
Dean Miller, 673 Pasa Tiempo, supported the project, detached units and the idea of
keeping as much open space landscaping as possible.
There were no further comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Commission discussed the merits of attached versus detached design, the
functionality of the common open space areas, the pedestrian path through the site, and
the screening of the trash bins. Although they agreed that the actual architecture was
pleasing, the majority felt that the unit size should be reduced and that additional units
should be attached.
Commr. Root questioned street access and noise standards, and expressed concern
with the decks facing the freeway.
_. Commr. Smith had concerns with the visual impact of the project from the freeway.
Commr. Lopes asked about the noise variance to the area that has a line of sight to the
highway, and felt the site layout could be changed to add more, and possibly smaller,
units.
Commr. Stevenson questioned detached versus attached units, and felt there could be
a larger common area with smaller units.
AYES: Commrs. Stevenson, Howard, Lopes
NOES: Commrs. Root and Smith
ABSENT: Commrs. Wilhelm and Boudreau
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried on a 3:2 vote.
4. 1400 Osos Street. ARC 242-05; Review of a new public art piece for Mitchell Park;
P -F -H zone; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Pam Ricci)
Principal Administrative Analyst Betsy Kiser presented the staff report, recommending
(as recommended by the public art jury and the Parks and Recreation Commission) that
the Commission find that the public artwork proposed for Mitchell Park entitled
ARC Minutes
March 20, 2006
Page 4
Perpetual Hope meets the City's guidelines for Public Art, and recommends City
Council approval of the project.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
David Curry, artist, discussed the materials that would be used.
There were no further comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Stevenson asked the artist about the lighting that would be used and the effect
it may have on neighbors' houses, and asked if the artist proposed a plaque.
Commr. Smith noted the lack of male adults in the sculpture.
Commr. Lopes asked about the type of planned lighting fixtures and the main color
used. He recommended that lighting be integral to the piece and that a plaque be
mounted at ground level in the pavement or attached at the base of the piece.
integrated into the piece and a plaque describing the piece, either mounted into the
ground or attached to the base of the piece. Seconded by Commr. Smith.
AYES: Commrs. Howard, Stevenson, Lopes and Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT; Commrs. Boudreau and Wilhelm
ABSTAIN: Commr. Root
The motion carried on a 4:0 vote.
5. Staff
A. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
A. Minutes of March 6, 2006
The minutes of March 6, 2006 were approved as amended.
ARC Minutes
March 20, 2006
Page 5
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m. to
the regular meeting of the ARC scheduled for April 3, 2006, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council
Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on 04/17/06
Diane R. Stuart, CM
Management Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
April 3, 2006
OATHS OF OFFICE:
Deputy City Clerk Julie O'Connor administered oaths of office to reappointed
Commissioner Allen Root and new Commissioners Steven Hopkins and Anthony
Palazzo
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Jim Lopes,
Steve Hopkins, Anthony Palazzo and Chairperson Zeijka Howard
Absent: None
Staff: Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore and Recording Secretary Jill Francis
ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as modified.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 919 Palm Street: ARC 193-01; Discussion of possible changes to the Morro Street
elevation of the Palm/Morro Office/Parking Structure; C -D zone; Copelands
Properties, LLC., applicant. (To be continued to April 17, 2006) (Pam Ricci)
This item was continued to April 17, 2006, without discussion, to allow the project
architect additional time to prepare elevations showing alternate ways that additional
vertical articulation could be added to the Morro Street elevation of the building to
provide a more distinct edge to the two brick colors.
2. 328 Marsh Street. ARC 230-05; Architectural review of a service station, changing
service bays to a convenience store, and site improvements including signage; C-R
zone; Chevron Products Co., applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report recommending approval of
the design of the remodel, based on findings and subject to conditions and code
requirements, which he outlined.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Tam Fenner, applicant's representative, spoke in support of the project, offered to
answer any questions, and testified that the driveway could not be deleted for vehicular
ARC Minutes
April 3, 2006
Page 2
and truck access and that they did not agree with that condition.
There were no further comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Commission agreed with staff that the corner landscape planter should not be
diminished in size and should instead be increased in size. They also discussed minor
changes to the storefront architecture and added conditions to require minor facade
changes.
Commissioners Lopes and Howard did not agree with the philosophy of a prominent
gas station at this location unless the entire site was to be modified to conceal the fuel
islands.
Commr. Lopes asked how these plans relate to the previously reviewed plans,
questioned the hazardous materials removal since the site is going from maintenance
bays to customer shopping, and questioned why the entry to the store is off center.
Commr. Root questioned pedestrian crosswalk improvements, the roof line and the
trash enclosure.
Commr. Palazzo questioned the reason for the change to the roof line and suggested
the front of the structure be more in line with the craftsman style.
Commr. Boudreau asked about the different window heights and the lighting spacing.
Commr. Wilhelm expressed the importance of the landscaping at the south end of the
property, including the apron.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins and Palazzo
NOES: Commrs. Howard and Lopes
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried on a 5:2 vote.
3. 4450 Broad Street. ARC 194-05; Conceptual review of a proposed business park
development including a total of 74,883 square feet of a new commercial floor area;
C -S zone VFP-Broad Street LLC., applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report, directed the Commission
to refine their discussion to the conceptual review items outlined in the staff report, and
ARC Minutes
April 3, 2006
Page 3
recommended continuance of the item to a date uncertain, with specific direction to the
applicant on site planning, building elevations, lighting and landscaping.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Brian Starr and Will Drake, applicant's representatives, gave a slide presentation
showing the different viewpoints of the project. They generally agreed with staff
recommended conditions and said they would return to the ARC with a proposal as
recommended, including a plan for a pedestrian path within the creek setback area at
the rear of the site.
Pierre Rademaker, Studio Design Group, discussed the main signage for the project.
Fred Vernacchia, applicant, discussed the type of project being proposed and the
parking location.
There were no further public comments.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commission discussion focused on the importance of the scenic corridor and the design
of the buildings fronting Broad Street. In general, they favored the project design but
wanted to see a greater variety of materials and colors throughout the development.
Minor changes to exterior materials and finishes were recommended. Additionally, the
Commission discouraged the use of an electronic message center sign, and asked the
applicant to prepare a photo -simulation of the project as viewed from the driving lane on
Broad Street in order to properly evaluate the scenic corridor impacts.
Commr. Lopes asked staff for the definition of "mixed use" as it relates to this project,
voiced concerns regarding the lack of view corridors, the design of parking layout, the
architectural design, and colors.
Commr. Boudreau questioned the tree planters in the parking lot and expressed the
need for a visual analysis.
Commr. Hopkins asked if parking was provided outside versus enclosed parking, would
the view corridor be greater. He questioned the usage of building F.
Commr. Wilhelm asked about the different materials to be used, expressed his pleasure
with the project, and suggested stucco panels be added, and different colors on the
buildings be considered.
Commr. Palazzo questioned staff about the pedestrian pathway location and the intent
of the main sign. He expressed concern with metal damage near the entrance to the
buildings.
Commr. Root noted concerns with the eves/gutter and awnings materials and colors,
and the building presentation to the street, suggesting the window moldings be a
different color.
ARC Minutes
April 3, 2006
Page 4
Commr. Howard asked about the back-flow protector location and visibility, noting the
use of colors to break up the different buildings is important.
On motion by Commr. Boudreau to approve the project in concept, and togo forward
with staff recommendations as follows: require a visual analysis, consider moving
Pedestrian pathway out of setback, add break areas, add shade trees to the various
locations and add a variety of colors and materials. Seconded by Commr. Root.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Boudreau, Howard, Hopkins, Palazzo
NOES: Commr. Lopes
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried on a 6:1 vote.
4. Staff
A. Agenda Forecast
Phil Dunsmore gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
B. Election
A vote was taken for Chairperson and Vice -Chairperson. On consensus of the
Commission, Vice -Chair Boudreau was elected Chairperson and Commr. Root was
elected Vice -Chairperson.
5. Commission:
A. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned
The ARC commented that the lights on the flag pole near KSBY had not been shielded.
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m. to
the regular meeting of the ARC scheduled for April 17, 2006, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council
Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on 04/17/06
Diane R. Stuart, CM
Management. Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
C ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
April 17, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Steve Hopkins, Jim Lopes, Anthony
Palazzo, Vice -Chair Allen Root and Chairperson Michael Boudreau
Absent: Commr. Howard
Staff: Interim Deputy Director Pam Ricci, Associate Planner Whitney Mcllvaine
and Recording Secretary Jill Francis
ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 919 Palm Street: ARC 193-01; Discussion of possible changes to the Morro Street
elevation of the Palm/Morro Office/Parking Structure; C -D zone; Copelands
Properties, LLC., applicant. (Continued from April 3, 2006) (Pam Ricci)
Interim Deputy Director Pam Ricci, presented the staff report, recommending the
Commission approve the revised Morro Street elevation that includes adding furred -out
brick veneer to create the appearance of pilasters, and consider adding an ornamental
panel as depicted on the revised elevation, based on a finding of consistency with
original project approvals to minimize the apparent mass of the structure through the
use of varied colors and materials and well -articulated elevations.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Mark Rawson, applicant's architect, explained the changes, and expressed that the
project is a good representation that is in compliance with original project approvals.
Craig Smith, applicant's representative, explained that pilasters were not part of the
original design and noted other ideas for changes that would be more reasonable.
There were no further comments made from the public
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Root asked for a review of the changes that have already been applied, as well
as those proposed.
ARC Minutes
April 17, 2006
Page 2
Commr. Palazzo asked for clarification regarding the original design and whether it was
intended to create the look of three distinct buildings.
Planner Ricci explained that the use of varied colors and materials was intended to help
reduce the apparent mass of the structure and create the look of distinct building
components.
Commr. Lopes explained the original intent of the project design.
Commr. Wilhelm noted he preferred the idea of using pre -cast concrete tiles over brick
for the look of pilasters, but supported the staff recommendation.
On motion by Commr. Wilhelm to approve the plan revisions to the Morro Street
elevation with brick veneer applied to create the appearance of two pilasters and an
ornamental panel added. Seconded by Commr. Lopes.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins, Lopes and Palazzo
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commr. Howard
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried on a 6:0 vote.
2. 2238 Broad Street ARC 62-05; Conceptual review of a new mixed use
development project with 91 residential units and 25,000 square feet of commercial
space; C -N -H and C -S -H zones; Halferty Development Co., applicant. (Continued
from March 20, 2006) (Whitney Mellvaine)
Associate Planner Whitney Mcllvaine, presented the staff report, recommending the
Commission continue action on the item with direction, and asking the Commission to
review specific aspect of the project for that direction.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Debbie Rudd, applicant's representative (RRM Design Group), gave a slide
presentation that illustrated how the project is divided into three different areas.
Dick DeBeikes, applicant, gave an overview of the project development and objectives.
Victor Montgomery, applicant's representative, explained the reasons for the different
styles of architecture.
Don Flair, applicant's representative, described the various elements of the project.
There were no further comments from the public.
ARC Minutes
April 17, 2006
Page 3
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Lopes questioned the different architecture styles on Building MPA, and asked
about the feasibility of a landscaped parkway and detached sidewalk along Broad
Street.
Commr. Palazzo questioned the pedestrian -style lights and the light level that would be
appropriate. He suggested a change to building MPA by stepping back the center
section of the east elevation.
Commr. Wilhelm noted that this is a "poster project' for future enhancement of the
Broad Street corridor. He asked about the materials and how they would attenuate
sound from the trains.
Commr. Root asked about the future phase and about the function of the solar chimney,
and suggested using alternative paving in the alley area of the Artisan walk to create an
auto park feel.
Commr. Hopkins voiced concern with certain architectural aspects, but overall was
pleased with the design. He felt a simpler color palette could be used.
Chairperson Boudreau questioned what window elements would be used and
suggested adding an occasional window style or treatment that is different or varied.
On motion by Greg Wilhelm to continue action on this item to a date uncertain with
direction to the applicant. Seconded by Steve Hopkins.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins, Lopes and Palazzo
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commr. Howard
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried on a 6:0 vote.
3. Staff
A. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
4. Commission:
A. Minutes of March 20, and April 3, 2006
�- The minutes of March 20, and April 3, 2006 were approved as submitted.
ARC Minutes
April 17, 2006
Page 4
B. Recent Project Review- Lessons Learned
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. to
the regular meeting of the ARC scheduled for Monday, May 1, 2006, at 5:00 p.m., in the
Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on May 1, 2006.
'1 Diane R. Stuart, CM
Management Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
�— May 1, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Zeljka Howard, Steve Hopkins, Anthony
Palazzo, Vice -Chair Allen Root and Chairperson Michael Boudreau
Absent: Commr. Jim Lopes
Staff: Interim Deputy Director Pam Ricci, Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore,
Associate Planner Jaime Hill and Recording Secretary Jill Francis
ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 800 Palm Street: ARC and ER 187-05; Conceptual review of a mixed use project
in conjunction with the AH Louis Store, and environmental review; C -D -H zone; Dr.
William Watson, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Commissioner Howard stepped down from participation due to a potential conflict of
interest.
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore, presented the staff report, recommending
continuance of the item to a date uncertain, with specific direction to the applicant on
building design and site planning to incorporate project modifications and refinements.
Bob Richmond, applicant's representative, explained the articulation of the design.
Glenn Wood, applicant's representative, explained how the design follows Community
Design Guidelines for the downtown.
Dr. William Watson, applicant and grandson of Ah Louis, discussed the extent of
reconstruction done to the store after the earthquake damaged the building, as well as
the history of the site and the store itself, expressing his hope for future expansion.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Public comments focused on potential overlook, scale, mass and the proposed historic
theme of the building.
ARC Minutes
May 1, 2006
Page 2
Allan Cooper, San Luis Obispo, indicated that if the 50 -foot height limit is exceeded, the
project should include housing. He noted that the pagoda -like roofs may not be
authentic Chinese architectural features.
David Brodie, retired professor of Architecture, spoke in support of preserving the Ah
Louis store by not overwhelming it with a larger complex.
Dan Krieger, San Luis Obispo, historian and columnist, spoke in support of the
restoration and value of the Ah Louis store and the need to continue that vision for the
property. He also supported the new project having familiar Chinese architectural details
that are compatible with the historic area.
Bruno Giberti, San Luis Obispo, felt the project has a fictional architecture design and a
more realistic style should be aspired to.
Liz Krieger, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the design and its whimsical feel.
There were no further comments made from the public
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commission comments focused on the historic Chinatown theme and how it should be
represented. Commissioners felt that the mass and height of the building was
acceptable as long as it complied with the zoning code. Direction was offered to comply
with the CHC's request to refine the design and commissioners felt that a photo -
simulation would help them understand the design.
Commr. Wilhelm noted concerns with setbacks and sidewalks, questioned if wood
would be used in the facade, and asked whether a separate entrance would be
available from Chorro Street, strengthening the courtyard effect.
Commr. Boudreau asked about the required setback on Chorro Street, as well as the
height of the proposed structure.
Commr. Root asked the applicant for his perspective on the housing issue in San Luis
Obispo, as well as the materials proposed.
Commr. Hopkins questioned the possibility of lowering the building by five feet while still
keeping the fourth floor. He noted it would appear more historic if the design was less
ornate.
Commr. Palazzo supported the design with some slight changes.
The Commission supported the direction provided by staff and General Plan guidelines
with a photo -simulation and model.
ARC Minutes
May 1, 2006
Page 3
" On motion by Commr. Wilhelm to continue consideration of the project to a date
uncertain, with direction to comply with the CRC's request to refine the desiqn.
Seconded by Commr. Hopkins.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins and Palazzo
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commr. Lopes
ABSTAIN: Commr. Howard
The motion carried on a 5:0 vote.
2. 1135 Roundhouse Avenue. ARC 15-06; Architectural review for new dispatch
center on the site of Fire Station No. 1; PF -H zone; City of San Luis Obispo,
applicant. (Jaime Hill)
Associate Planner Jaime Hill presented the staff report, recommending final approval to
the project, based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements which
she outlined.
Candace Wong, applicant's representative, gave an overview of the proposed project.
Marsha Walberg, project manager, was available to answer any questions from the
Commission.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Commission was generally very supportive of the site planning and design.
Commr. Howard agreed with the regulations for the backflow device to be 15 feet. from
the public right-of-way.
Commr. Root questioned the parking requirements and asked about the necessity of
the height of the new buildings.
Commr. Hopkins..
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Howard, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins and Palazzo
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commr. Lopes
ABSTAIN: None
ARC Minutes
May 1, 2006
Page 4
The motion carried on a 6:0 vote.
3. Staff
A. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
4. Commission:
A. Minutes of April 17, 2006
The minutes of April 17, 2006 were approved as amended.
B. Recent Project Review- Lessons Learned
Commissioner Howard talked about the National APA Conference that she recently
attended in San Antonio, Texas. She discussed the Design Guidelines of Cary, N.C.
which she felt were an excellent resource due to their pictorial layout and precise
language, particularly how the term "articulation" was used. She also mentioned a new
study available at ite.org about designing context sensitive urban corridors.
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m. to
the regular meeting of the ARC scheduled for Monday, May 15, 2006, at 5:00 p.m., in
the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on May 15, 2006.
.Diane R. Stuart, CM
Management Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
May 15, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Zeljka Howard, Steve Hopkins, Jim Lopes,
Anthony Palazzo, Vice -Chair Allen Root and Chairperson Michael
Boudreau
Absent: None
Staff: Interim Deputy Director Pam Ricci, Contract Planner Whitney Mcllvaine,
Associate Planner Tyler Corey and Recording Secretary Jill Francis
ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 2932 Augusta Street: ARC 159-05; Review of a 9 residential condominiums; R-4
zone; Steno -Wolf associates, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
This item was continued to June 5 ,2006, without discussion, to allow Public Works
Department staff additional time to review project changes.
2. Review of three new single-family homes in the Bowden Ranch development and a
new subdivision identification sign, including:
a. 1618 Woodland Drive.. ARC MI 25-06; Review of a new single-family dwelling;
R-1 -S zone; Mangano Homes, applicant. (Tyler Corey)
b. 1860 Wilding Lane, ARC MI 24-06; Review of a new single-family dwelling;
R-1 -S zone; Mangano Homes, applicant. (Tyler Corey)
c. 1850 Wilding Lane. ARC MI 23-06; Review of a new single-family dwelling;
R -1-S zone Mangano Homes, applicant. (Tyler Corey)
Associate Planner Tyler Corey presented the staff report recommending final approval,
based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements which he outlined.
Carol Florence, applicant's representative, described a meeting that was held with the
neighbors to review the house designs, discussed the pending master use permit which
ARC Minutes
May 15, 2006
Page 2
would incorporate design guidelines, and explained the purpose of the sign and wall
- colors.
Stan Camby, applicant's architect, reviewed the site plan and noted his availability for
questions.
Andy Mangano, applicant, spoke in support of the project, and responded to concerns
with the sign, noting his preference to not add stone to the sign.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Wendy Brown, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the updated design of the project.
There were no further comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Discussion focused on whether a subdivision identification sign was appropriate for the
project or if the existing retaining head wall located at the Lizzie Street / Wilding Lane
intersection should be stained and landscaped without signage. The Commission also
cited concerns with the apparent massing of the proposed residence on Lot 2 as viewed
from Wilding Lane, given the topography of the site.
-' Commr. Lopes questioned the subdivision identification sign, suggested the retaining
head wall have cultured stone or smaller letters, suggested the palm trees proposed on
lot 2 be changed to shade trees, and expressed concerns with building massing as
viewed from Wilding Lane.
Commr. Boudreau had questions regarding the design of the wall related to the change
in planes and the extent of the cap.
Commr. Root discussed the use of different home designs and supported the sign
design, but suggested a scaled back version of it.
Commr. Wilhelm suggested an alternative design for the wall and questioned the
placement of trees.
On a motion by Commr. Wilhelm to grant final approval to the project with conditions
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Howard, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins, Lopes and Palazzo
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ARC Minutes
May 15, 2006
Page 3
The motion carried on a 7:0 vote.
3. 1045 Foothill Boulevard. ARC 234-04; Review of Sierra Vista Hospital expansion
including a four-story tower addition and a five -level parking structure; O zone: John
Hollander, applicant. (Whitney Mcllvaine)
Commr. Boudreau stepped down from participation due to a potential conflict of interest.
Associate Planner Whitney Mcllvaine, presented the staff report, recommending the
Commission approve the mitigated negative declaration of environmental impact and
grant final approval to the project.
John Hollander, applicant, expressed the need for the project.
John Knight, applicant's representative, discussed the project changes since the
approval three years ago, noting the area of the tower has been increased from 85,000
square feet to 125,000 square feet, and an underground level has been added to the
parking structure. He suggested adding concrete pavers in the new plaza and in the
medical office plaza, expressed his desire to use the existing lights as well as adding
new ones up to 20 -feet in height where needed, and discussed various options relating
to types of trees.
Ken Liv, applicant's architect, discussed the overall design of the project and the
proposed colors.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Kathy Janette, San Luis Obispo, expressed her support for the project and its
progression.
Steve Delmartini, San Luis Obispo, expressed his support for the project.
Paul Georghiou, SLO, emergency physician at Sierra Vista Hospital, spoke in favor of
the project and reiterated the need for the addition to the hospital.
Adam Janette, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project and agreed that there is
a great need for the project.
Candy Markwith, employee for Sierra Vista, Hospital, spoke in favor of the project.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Discussion focused on ways to improve compatibility between the existing hospital
buildings and the proposed addition, project lighting and landscaping, given the
_ surrounding residential and office uses and the extensive redesign of the surface
parking areas proposed as part of the overall hospital master plan.
ARC Minutes
May 15, 2006
Page 4
The Commission reviewed each item on the revised plan with the applicant, discussed
additional conditions, painting the fagade/arches monochromatic, adding a painted cap
piece on the parking structure, leaving the duct work unpainted, adding screening trees
and dense planting, limiting the light fixtures pole height and footcandles, adding new
language proposed by Public Works on the mitigation measures and code
requirements, and consideration of an alternate location for a pedestrian walkway.
Commr. Lopes asked staff if tree removals were discussed with the Natural Resources
Manager, and expressed concerns with the sheer wall not having enough definition.
Commr. Wilhelm asked about plans for future phases, and suggested the current
arches be painted to blend in with the colors presented.
Commrs. Hopkins and Palazzo questioned changes to the current structures and life
span of such, in addition to questions about the location of the service yard.
Commr. Root questioned the height of the light fixture.
On a motion by Commr. Wilhelm to qrant final approval to a new trauma tower addition
to the existing hospital building and to a new 520 car garage at the corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Casa Street, and approve the project's Mitigated Negative Declaration of
environmental impact. Seconded by Commr. Howard.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Howard, Root, Hopkins, Lopes, Palazzo
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Commr. Boudreau
ABSENT: None
The motion carried with a 6:0 vote
4. Staff
A. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. There was discussion on the
possibility of canceling the first meeting in July which falls on July 3ro, the day before the
July 4th legal holiday.
5. Commission:
A. Minutes of May 1, 2006
The minutes of May 1, 2006 were approved as submitted.
B. Recent Project Review- Lessons Learned
ARC Minutes
May 15, 2006
Page 5
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:47 p.m. to
the regular meeting of the ARC scheduled for Monday, June 5, 2006, at 5:00 p.m., in
the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on June 19, 2006.
Diane R. Stuart,'CM
Management Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
June 5, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Zeljka Howard, Steve Hopkins, Anthony Palazzo, Jim
Lopes, Vice -Chair Allen Root and Chairperson Michael Boudreau
Absent: Commr. Greg Wilhelm
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Associate Planners Phil Dunsmore and Tyler
Corey, and Recording Secretary Jill Francis
ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
499 N. Chorro Street: ARC 207-05; Review of a 6 unit condominium project; R-4
zone; Bella Vista SLO, LLC, applicant. (Tyler Corey)
Associate Planner Tyler Corey, presented the staff report, recommending final approval
based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements, which he outlined.
Truitt Vance, applicant, spoke in support of the project, answered questions and
explained why pedestrian access provided to each individual unit could be very
challenging given existing site constraints.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Discussion focused on providing pedestrian access from the public right-of-way to each
individual unit, privacy and overlook impacts to adjacent properties and buildings and
colors and materials proposed for building elevations. Based on existing site
topography and extensive street frontage, in was determined that the proposed site
layout was acceptable with the addition of two pedestrian connections and additional
landscaping along North Chorro and that a color and materials board, including actual
samples to match those depicted on the bottom of the rendering, be submitted to
Planning staff for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Commr. Palazzo questioned the roof type to be used.
ARC Minutes
June 5, 2006
Page 2
Commr. Lopes had concerns with design elements including setbacks and extensive
drive aisles, noting he would like to see a variety of street trees rather than only
jacaranda.
Commr. Boudreau discussed visual impacts and site problems.
Commr. Root had concerns with the variety of different roofing and siding materials to
break up the planes of the buildings rather than using architectural details.
On motion by Commr. Palazzo to grant final approval. Seconded by Commr. Root.
AYES: Commrs., Root, Boudreau, Hopkins, Palazzo, Howard and Lopes
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commr. Wilhelm
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried on a 6:0 vote.
2. 3251 S. Hiquera Street ARC PR 228-04; Review of a revision to a new medical
office building; C -S -S zone; Tolosa Health Developers, LLC, applicant. (Tyler
Corey)
Associate Planner Tyler Corey presented the staff report, recommending final approval,
based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements. He explained the
changes to the project since the prior review of the project, including conditions to install
the the back-flow system inside the building.
Warren Hamrick, applicant's representative, described the new design, gave a video
presentation of the project, and explained the different building features as well as the
canopy and its design, color and application.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Discussion mainly focused on the proposed building colors and materials. Ultimately,
the ARC required the applicant to submit a color and material board, including actual
samples, to Planning staff for review and approval with a maroon color for the fingers
and under -story of the canopy with a charcoal roof, a charcoal gray color (70-90% gray)
for building awnings, and maroon tile accents. The Commission was generally very
supportive of the site planning and design.
Commr. Lopes suggested using metal instead of concrete columns for the canopy.
Commr. Howard recommended using maroon or black accents on the building.
ARC Minutes
June 5, 2006
Page 3
Commr. Root questioned the airport area requirements as it relates to scenic corridors,
and suggested some type of design at the base of the columns.
Commr. Palazzo asked if plants or trees could be added to the courtyard area to
improve the outdoor space.
On motion by Commr. Palazzo to -grant final approval to the project. Seconded by
Commr. Howard.
AYES: Commrs. Lopes, Howard, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins and Palazzo
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commr. Wilhelm
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried on a 6:0 vote.
3. 151 N. Santa Rosa Street. ARC 238-05; Review of a remodel to an existing
service station; C -R -S zone; Chevron Products Co., applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report, recommending approval of
the design, based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements which
he outlined. He described the proposed changes, displayed the colors and materials
board, and recommended retention of the mission tile roof, provision for bicycle parking,
and removal of the parapet.
Tam Fenner, applicant's representative, noted that six parking spaces are required, and
described the difference between this site and the site on Higuera Street.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
A majority of the Commission felt that adding height to the center of the structure was
the correct approach to help screen the back wall of the adjacent bank building. The
ARC directed that the entry be highlighted by a revised roof form utilizing an open gable
or a pyramidal hip with either standing -seam or tile roofing. They also asked that the
canopy design better coordinate with the remodeled building.
The Commission noted the need for an entrance statement for the convenience store,
and felt the project should have more of San Luis Obispo element.
Commr. Root questioned the signs to be used.
Commr. Lopes suggested a different, less ornate cap for the parapet, and noted that the
entry tower should be more pronounced and extend out further, if possible.
ARC Minutes
June 5, 2006
Page 4
Commr. Howard questioned access to the station from surrounding properties, noting
she would like to see the parapet removed.
Commr. Hopkins supported the use of the parapets, given the backdrop of the bank
building.
On a motion by Commr. Howard to continue review of the project to date uncertain with
direction regarding a revised landscape plan, use of stucco for the canopy columns and
a different color if possible for the ACM panels on the canopy, changes to the
convenience store building roof treatments and increased depth to the tower.
Seconded by Commr. Hopkins.
AYES: Commrs. Howard, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins, Lopes and Palazzo
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commr. Wilhelm
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried on a 6:0 vote.
4. 2932 Augusta Street. ARC 159-05; Review of a modified site plan for 9 residential
condominiums; R-4 zone; Steno -Wolf Associates, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report recommending final
approval to the modified site plan.
Garth Kornreich, applicant's representative, discussed the location of the trash
enclosure.
Steve Ferrario, applicant, addressed concerns noted by the public.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Louise Justice, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the new design.
Mary Lazare, San Luis Obispo, expressed concerns with the loss of view from Judson
Terrace and the lack of parking for the project.
There were no further comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Commission supported the revised project plans that essentially "flipped" the site
plan, based on the same findings and with most of the same conditions as originally
approved by the ARC on March 6, 2006. The changes to the site plan were necessary
to honor an existing easement on the property that provides emergency access to the
rear buildings of Judson Terrace on the project's south side. The main topic of
ARC Minutes
June 5, 2006
Page 5
discussion was the design of the trash enclosure because of its prominent location in
the project's street yard. The ARC eventually accepted the trash enclosure design with
doors facing the street with conditions that there be trailing vines on the trellis above the
structure, clinging vines on the walls of the structure, and hardware on the doors with a
decorative motif
Commr. Lopes questioned the location of the backflow equipment and the trash
enclosure.
Commr. Root asked staff about the trellis over the trash enclosure and the possibility of
the trash enclosure doors being left open.
On motion by Commr. Howard to grant final approval to the modified plans, based on
staffs recommendations. Seconded by Commr. Root.
AYES: Commrs.. Howard, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins, Lopes, Palazzo
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commr. Wilhelm
ABSTAIN: None
The motion passed by 6:0 vote.
5. Staff
A. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
6. Commission:
A. Recent Project Review- Lessons Learned
The ARC reiterated the importance of having colors and materials boards with actual
samples along with project plans prior to final approval. There was discussion about
how colored elevations and prints often do not accurately portray the actual colors used
in the completed project and the difficulties and issues that this can cause.
The ARC also discussed concerns with changes occurring after their review of projects.
The Commission recognized that staff needs some flexibility to work with applicants on
needed changes to accommodate code issues that may arise or other minor kinds of
modifications, but wanted to stress that aesthetically significant or substantive changes
needed to return for the full Commission's review.
ADJOURNMENT:
ARC Minutes
June 5, 2006
Page 6
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. to
the regular meeting of the ARC scheduled for Monday, June 19, 2006, at 5:00 p.m., in
the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by Architectural Review Commission on June 19, 2006.
Management Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
June 19, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Zeljka Howard, Steve Hopkins, Jim Lopes,
Anthony Palazzo, Vice -Chair Allen Root and Chairperson Michael
Boudreau
Absent: None
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Contract Planner Whitney Mcllvaine, Associate
Planner Jaime Hill and Recording Secretary Jill Francis
ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
153 Stenner Street: ARC 1-06; Review of plans to construct a new 10 -unit
residential condominium project; R-3 zone; Ocean Ridge Development Group,
applicant. (Jaime Hill)
Associate Planner Jaime Hill presented the staff report recommending continuance to a
date uncertain, with direction on changes to incorporate into the site plan and elevations
to provide for improved neighborhood compatibility and compliance with the City's
property development standards. The presentation focused on the requested setback
reductions, trash collection, and common open space.
Carol Florence, applicant's representative, spoke in support of the project and asked the
commission to review all necessary aspects of it.
Brad Brechwald, Wallace Group, (representing the applicant) discussed drainage issues
relating to the project.
Chad Kocher, applicant's architect, discussed the size of the project, color intent, and
proposed the location and appearance of the trash enclosure in the street yard.
.PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Pat Dempsey, San Luis Obispo, expressed the need for more parking in the area.
Grace Dempsey, San Luis Obispo, expressed concerns with the location of the trash
enclosure, the need for fencing, landscape maintenance, private areas for residents,
and drainage.
ARC Minutes
June 19, 2006
Page 2
There were no further comments made from the public
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Discussion focused on trash collection, common open space, and the requested
setback exceptions. The Commission generally liked the site design and layout of the
proposed development, but felt that too many exceptions were being requested and that
the project could be scaled down to conform to City Standards. They discussed
alternative trash collection methods, such as shared waste wheelers, having dumpster
enclosures outside of the street yard, and splitting the recycling and refuse enclosures
to flank the driveway and provide something of an entry feature. Finally, they supported
the open space plan as proposed, including the landscape path areas leading to the
units (but excluding the area of the guest parking spaces), and requested that the
fountain be brought forward in the common open space/recreation area.
Commr. Howard questioned the area needed for common open -space and the location
of the fountain.
Commr. Lopes asked about guidelines for the common open -space area, noting that the
project could be more efficient, and concurred with staffs' recommendations.
Commr. Hopkins questioned the setback exceptions and whether the existing home on
the site could be salvaged. He expressed support for the project, noting the change
was good for the neighborhood.
Commr. Palazzo expressed concern about the adjacent property that will be cast in
shadow with the setback exception.
Commr. Boudreau questioned the amount of common open space and the lack of
setback. He agreed with Commr. Lopes that the trash enclosure could be moved and
felt the project could meet the standards.
Commr. Wilhelm supported the project but had concerns with the trash enclosure,
noting his preference that the individual units have roller trash bins.
Commr. Root noted concern with the trash enclosure issue, the need for setbacks and
felt the amount of common open -space was sufficient. He felt that parking could be an
issue in the future, and expressed his support for the architectural style.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Howard, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins, Lopes and Palazzo
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried on a 7:0 vote.
ARC Minutes
June 19, 2006
Page 3
2. 2238 Broad Steet. ARC and ER 62-05; Final review of a new mixed-use
development project with 91 residential units and approximately 25,000 square feet
of commercial space, and environmental review; C -N -H, C -S -H and C -S -S -H zones;
Halferty Development, applicant. (Whitney Mcllvaine)
Associate Planner Whitney Mcllvaine presented the staff report, recommending final
approval of the mixed use project, and approval of the mitigated negative declaration.
Debbie Redd (RRM Design Group) applicant's representative reviewed all the changes
from the previous design, and provided brick and paint samples.
Don Flair, applicant's architect, was available for questions.
Lief MacKay, Landscape Architect, discussed site drainage and the various types of
trees proposed.
Kris Vardas, project manager, discussed the view corridor from Broad Street.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Commission discussed changes to the project based on previous direction and
newly provided project details, including lighting, screen and retaining wall design,
modified building colors, building elevations, alternative paving materials, tree choices in
the landscape plan, and the proposed roof garden on top of the project's largest
building. In granting final approval, the Commission acknowledged that this is a large
and somewhat complex project and that there will likely be some additional review of
project details during development of construction drawings. Both the applicant and staff
concurred. In general all the Commissioners were very supportive of the project's
mixed-use concept and its design.
Commr. Lopes pointed out the area that will be part of a future widening of Broad
Street. He suggested adding lighting at the entrance of certain buildings, changing
residential carports to garages with garage doors, and discussed view corridors.
Commr. Wilhelm questioned if the project was in compliance, with the exception of the
height of the solar chimney, and discussed the stucco finish used elsewhere in the
project.
Commr. Root asked if Emily Street would be going through, and if project phasing has
been scheduled.
Commr. Boudreau asked if there were significant issues with the environmental review.
Commr. Hopkins questioned the color change to building AW3.
ARC Minutes
June 19, 2006
Page 4
Commr. Palazzo suggested changing the color of AW3 from weatherboard to a
particular grey color, and felt different elements and/or colors should be used on the
storefronts to bring in variety.
Commr. Howard agreed with Commr. Palazzo on the change to the color on AW3.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Howard, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins, Lopes and Palazzo
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carred on a 7:0 vote.
3. Staff
A. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. She reminded the
Commission that the Meeting of July 3rd has been cancelled.
4. Commission:
A. Minutes of May 15, 2005 and June 5, 2006
The minutes of May 15th and June 5, 2006 were approved as presented.
B. Recent Project Review- Lessons Learned
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:14 p.m. to
the regular meeting of the ARC scheduled for Monday, July 17, 2006, at 5:00 p.m., in
the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by Architectural Review Commission on July 17, 2006.
Diane R. Stuart, CM
Management Assistant
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
s
o
Council Hearing Room
Qbj�E"`6� City Hall - 990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Meeting Canceled
July 3, 2006 Monday 5:00 p.m.
The Architectural Review Commission meeting scheduled for Monday, July 3, 2006,
has been canceled.
The next regular meeting of the Architectural Review Commission is scheduled for
Monday, July 17, 2006, at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990
Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA.
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
July 17, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Steve Hopkins, Jim Lopes, Vice -Chair
Allen Root and Chairperson Michael Boudreau
Absent: Zeljka Howard and Anthony Palazzo
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Parks and Recreation Director Betsy Kiser,
Associate Planner Tyler Corey and Recording Secretary Jill Francis
ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
Item #6 was considered first since it was a matter to be continued without discussion.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 919 Palm Street: ARC PA
parking structure and offices;
applicant. (Pam Ricci)
97-06; Review of a public art proposal for the new
C -D -H zone; Palm Street Parking Structure, LLC,
Parks and Recreation Director Betsy Kiser presented the staff report recommending the
Commission find that the proposed public artwork meets the City's guidelines for public
art, based on findings and subject to conditions.
Mark Rawson, applicant's representative, described the public art piece entitled Court of
Flags.
Bob Nichols, artist, explained the problems with the prior display
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Commission agreed that this was a good place to recreate the art piece, but
expressed some concerns that it may be damaged by passing vehicles or subject to
graffiti
�' Commr. Root asked the applicant about possible lighting.
ARC Minutes
July 17, 2006
Page 2
Commr. Lopes questioned the glazing and improved glazing techniques, and noted
concerns with traffic in the area.
Commr. Hopkins asked the artist what percentage of the original sculpture will be
preserved. Bob Nichols responded that the piece would be entirely new tiles.
Commr. Wilhelm asked about the vulnerability of the completed sculpture.
On motion by Commr. Wilhelm to find that the public art piece meets the City's criteria
the library side of the accessway. Seconded by Commr. Hopkins.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins, Lopes
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Howard and Palazzo
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried on a 5:0 vote.
2. 174 and 178 Suburban Road. ARC 58-06; Review of plans to construct two new
commercial shell buildings; C -S -S zone; Ric Paul, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Associate Planner Tyler Corey presented the staff report recommending final approval
to the project, based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements.
Mike Peachey, applicant's representative, described the proposed landscaping.
Ric Paul, property owner, was available for questions.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Discussion focused on providing landscaping within the parkway and darkening the
proposed clear anodized aluminum finish for braces, storefronts and window frames to
enhance the appearance of the building.
Commr. Lopes asked about the area surrounding the project, discussed skylights and
rain gutters, and suggested some color on the window frames instead of a clear finish.
Commr. Wilhelm asked about the materials and their ratings to be used.
-\ It was the consensus of the Commission that they would like to see the proposed clear
anodized aluminum finish for braces, storefronts and window frames darkened to
enhance the appearance of the building.
ARC Minutes
July 17, 2006
Page 3
On motion by Commr. Root to grant final approval, with the proposed clear anodized
aluminum finish for braces, storefronts and window frames darkened to enhance the
appearance of the building. Seconded by Commr. Wilhelm.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Boudreau, Root, Hopkins, Lopes
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Howard and Palazzo
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried on a 5:0 vote
3. 170 Suburban Road. ARC 76-06; Review of a new commercial shell building;
C -S- S zone; Scott Stocking, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Associate Planner Tyler Corey presented the staff report recommending final approval
based on findings and subject to conditions recommended by staff.
Mike Peachy, applicant's representative, discussed the project and its particulars.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Overall, the ARC appreciated the architectural style and detailing of the building given
its use as a warehouse in a service commercial zoning district.
Commr. Lopes discussed varying the roof pitch of the gable end on the south elevation.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins and Lopes
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Howard and Palazzo
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried on a 5:0 vote.
4. 562 Sandercock Street. ARC 202-05; Final review of a 5 -unit residential
condominium development, including 25% density bonus for affordable housing;
R-2 zone; Mike Sathre, applicant. (Jaime Hill)
Senior Planner Pam Ricci gave the staff report, recommending final approval to the
- project, based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements.
ARC Minutes
July 17, 2006
Page 4
Aaron Gannage, applicant's representative, described the window treatments and trash
enclosures.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Discussion focused on the location of the trash enclosures and bicycle parking. The
Commission provided some direction on the landscaping plan and the details of the
property line masonry wall, and asked for changes to the locations of the two trash
enclosures.
Commr. Lopes questioned removal of the mulberry tree and whether it was necessary
for the widening of the driveway. He noted he would like to see more vertical trees other
than the buckeyes incorporated into the landscaping plan and corner trees moved in
further from the property lines.
Commr. Wilhelm noted concerns with the location of the trash enclosure in terms of its
proximity to the entry of Unit 4.
Commr. Hopkins asked about the possibility of rafter tails.
Commr. Boudreau noted he would like to see the windows of the garage doors have a
square or rectangular form.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins, Lopes
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Howard and Palazzo
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried on a 5:0 vote.
5. 75 Santa Rosa Street ARC 234-05; Review of a new 2 story office building with
exceptions to building height from 25 feet to 34 feet and street yard setback from
feet to 12 feet, O zone; Mid -State Bank & Trust, applicant. (Tyler Corey)
Associate Planner Tyler Corey presented the staff report recommending final approval
based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements.
Pat Blote, applicant's representative, supported the staff recommendation including
conditions of approval, and explained the reasons for the location of the front entrance
and height of the building.
ARC Minutes
July 17, 2006
Page 5
Mike. Munroe, applicant, discussed the problems with inhabitants near the trash
enclosure.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Diane Kirby, San Luis Obispo, voiced concems with added lighting from parking lot pole
lights, landscaping, noise and the location of the trash enclosure.
There were no further comments made by the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Discussion focused on the lack of a public entrance facing Santa Rosa Street, building
orientation to the Santa Rosa street frontage, proposed building height and street yard
setback exception. Public comment was received from one adjacent neighbor to the
south, Diane Kirby, who cited concerns with added lighting from parking lot pole lights,
landscaping, noise and the location of the trash enclosure.
Commr. Lopes asked if the City Arborist made recommendations on the removal of the
large tree, and commented on the articulation, design elements, landscaping plans, and
lighting.
Commr. Wilhelm addressed potential problems that were of concern to the public, and
noted his support for the project design.
Commr. Hopkins suggested camouflage netting be added to the fence temporarily to
block street lights until the landscaping matures.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Hopkins, Lopes
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Howard and Palazzo
ABSTAIN: Commr. Boudreau
The motion carried on a 4:0 vote.
6. 1772 Calle Joaguin. ARC 123-05; Review of an unmanned wireless
telecommunications facility; O -S zone; Cingular Wireless, applicant. (To be
continued to a date uncertain) (Tyler Corey)
This item was continued to a date uncertain without discussion.
0
ARC Minutes
July 17, 2006
Page 6
7. Staff
A. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci provided a forecast of items expected on the next meeting agenda. She
noted that three commissioners had indicated that they would not be at the next
meeting; therefore, the remaining four would need to all be there in order to have a
quorum to vote on projects.
She also informed the Commission that an appeal filed by Terry Mohan of the ARC's
action to approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration related to traffic mitigation
measures would be on the City Council agenda of July 18tH
8. Commission:
A. Minutes of June 19, 2006
The minutes of June 19, 2006 were approved as submitted.
B. Recent Project Review- Lessons Learned
Commr. Lopes again expressed concerns with the appearance of the windows in the
Sephora tenant space within the Court Street Project where display partitions had been
built in front of windows. He suggested that with the review of future projects that a
condition be included to prevent this from happening.
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. to
the regular meeting of the ARC scheduled for Monday, August 7, 2006, at 5:00 p.m., in
the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on August 7, 2006.
Management Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
- ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
August 7, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Steve Hopkins, Jim Lopes, Anthony Palazzo and Vice -
Chairperson Allen Root
Absent: Commissioners Zeljka Howard, Greg Wilhelm, and Chairperson Michael
Boudreau
Staff: Deputy Director Doug Davidson, Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Associate
Planners Phil Dunsmore, Michael Codron and Jaime Hill, and Recording
Secretary Jill Francis
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
BUSINESS ITEMS:
1. Tumbling Waters Plan Distribution. ARC 151-03; 861 and 953 Orcutt Road.
Overview and distribution of plans for the Tumbling Waters project, a new
residential neighborhood of 178 homes located on the south side of Orcutt Road
between Laurel Lane and Broad Street. ARC review of the project is scheduled as a
public hearing for the August 21st agenda. (Michael Codron)
Associate Planner Michael Codron presented the staff report, explaining that the item
was listed as business item on the agenda so that staff could provide the Commission
with a brief overview of the project and distribute project plans, giving the Commission
additional time to become familiar with this complex project. It was noted that the first
public hearing is scheduled before the ARC on August 21, 2006.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
2. 4450 & 4460 Broad Street. ARC 194-05; Review of a proposed business park
development including a total of 74,883 square feet of new commercial floor area;
C -S zone; VFP - Broad Street, LLC, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff, recommending approval of the
Mitigated Negative Declaration and final approval to the project design, based on
findings and subject to conditions, mitigations measures and code requirements. He
presented a photo simulation showing view corridors and a photometrics for the lights.
Brian Stan- and Will Drake, applicant's representatives, presented a slide presentation
including the visual impact from the street, and discussed the proposed project signage.
Fred Vemachia, applicant, further explained the reason for a main entry sign with a
large electronic message center.
ARC Minutes
August 7, 2006
Page 2
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Commission discussed the proposed sign program at great length, debated the
proposed Electronic Message Center, and decided to move the project forward without
the sign program and continue review of the sign program to a date uncertain
Commr. Lopes questioned the location for backflow, asked about future usage and
upkeep of the main sign, discussed the creek setback exception relevant to the
pedestrian pathway, and suggested discussion of different roof pitches.
Commr. Hopkins questioned the usage of the sign..
Commr. Palazzo asked staff for a further explanation on the Sign Regulations as it
relates to the size of the proposed sign, and noted concerns with the creek setback
exception.
The Commission's general consensus was supportive of the proposed design with the
staffs findings and recommendations. Final resolution of the mitigation measures
recommended by the Air Pollution Control District will be made by staff.
On motion by Commr. Palazzo to adopt the mitigated negative declaration and grant
final approval to the project design, based on modified findings and conditions including
a requirement to move the proposed pedestrian path outside of the creek setback
install additional shade trees in the parking lot to comply with the City's Parking and
Driveway Standards, and with the project's sign program to return to the ARC
Seconded by Commr. Hopkins.
AYES: Commrs. Root, Hopkins, Palazzo
NOES: Commr. Lopes
ABSENT: Commrs. Howard, Wilhelm, Chair Boudreau
ABSTAIN: None
The above motion allows the applicant to install pole lights at the rear of the site,
contrary to staffs recommendation to limit allowed lighting to bollard lights in this area.
Commissioner Lopes voted against the motion with concerns about visual resources
along the scenic corridor.
The motion carried on a 3:1 vote
ARC Minutes
August 7, 2006
Page 3
3. 577 & 579 Marsh Street and 1213 & 1221 Nibomo Street. ARC 36-06; Review of
a mixed use project; 33 residential units and 6,200 square feet of commercial
space; C -D zone; Bernard Homes, applicant. (Jaime Hill)
Associate Planner Jaime Hill presented the staff report, recommending final approval to
the project, based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements.
Detlev Peikert and Scott Hopkins, architects for the applicant, presented the
Commission with a slide presentation, in addition to samples of tile, roof materials and
paint colors.
Carol Viera of FIRMA, landscape architect for the project, described the placement and
size of the potted plants and trees used to break up the visual mass of the structure
and provide shade.
John Campanelia, applicant, was available for questions.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Lopes asked if the project meets the City's height standards and voiced
concern with the loss of commercial space, and the privacy of the residents on Pacific
Street.
Commrs. Root and Hopkins expressed support for the project and discussed
planters/pots and their drainage.
Commr. Palazzo asked for clarification regarding the elevations of the project and
adjoining residences.
Palazzo.
AYES: Commrs. Hopkins and Palazzo
NOES: Commr. Lopes
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Howard, Wilhelm, Chair Boudreau
Commissioner Lopes voted against the motion due to concerns about neighborhood
compatibility, the location/lack of screening of the gas meters, the minimal height of the
patio walls to the rear of the townhomes, and due to desire for additional setbacks on
the second and third stories of the Nipomo Street elevation.
ARC Minutes
August 7, 2006
Page 4
CThe motion carried on a 3:1 vote.
4. 899 Higuera Street. ARC 79-06; Review of a fagade remodel to a downtown
building; C -D -H zone; Copeland's Properties, applicant. (Jaime Hill)
At the request of the applicant, the project was continued to the next regularly
scheduled meeting on August 21, 2006. Because there was no one from the public
wishing to speak on the item, it was continued without discussion.
COMMENT & DISCUSSION:
5. Staff:
A. Agenda Forecast - Pam Ricci provided a forecast of items expected on the
next meeting agenda. She noted that there would be two other items in
addition to the Tumbling Waters and Apple items, but that they were small
residential projects that the ARC had previously reviewed.
B. Memorandum — Ballot Measure Campaign Guidelines for Elected Officials
and Advisory Body Members. — Pam Ricci reiterated the restrictions for
advisory body members in terms of their discussion of the ballot measure.
C. 2007 Calendar — Pam Ricci pointed out that the regularly scheduled meeting
dates in January 2007 both fell on holidays. She suggested that the ARC meet
on the second and fourth Mondays in January instead. The Commission
agreed to this, but Commr. Lopes noted that the fourth Monday in January
would conflict with the Tree Committee meeting.
6. Commission:
A. Minutes: July 17, 2006
The minutes of July 17, 2006 were approved as submitted.
B. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned
Commr. Lopes noted that the photographs in the agenda packet were overly dark to the
point of being illegible. Pam Ricci she would talk to support staff to discuss it with the
printers.
The Commission again voiced their frustrations with the windows being blocked off for
the Sephora tenant improvement in the Court Street project. They suggested that the
white windows be darkened if possible so that they did not stand out as prominently.
Commr. Root mentioned that the Carroll Building at 969 Monterey Street looked very
attractive and that he really liked the look of the aged brick. He also mentioned that he
had been contacted by neighbors on Grove Street regarding their concerns with the
ARC Minutes
August 7, 2006
Page 5
�- installation of a mono -pine cell site next to the nearby medical center at California and
Highway 101.
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:02
p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for August 21, 2006 at 5:00 p.m. in the
Council Hearing Room, at City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by Architectural Review Commission on August 21, 2006.
Diane R. Stuart, CIVI
Management Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
August 21, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Anthony Palazzo, Jim Lopes, Steven
Hopkins, Vice -Chair Allen Root and Chairperson Michael Boudreau
Absent: Commissioner Zeljka Howard
Staff: Associate Planner Michael Codron, Senior Planner Pam Ricci and
Recording Secretary Jill Francis
ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as amended with item #3 continued to a date uncertain.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 153 Stenner Street. ARC 1-06; Final review of a 10 -unit residential condominium
project; R-3 zone; Ocean Ridge Development Group, applicant. (Jaime Hill)
Senior Planner Pam Ricci gave the staff report recommending final approval to the
project based on findings, and subject to conditions and code requirements.
Carol Florence, applicant's representative, described the project and discussed the
trash enclosure and backflow mechanism.
Chad Kocher, applicant's architect, was available for questions.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Commission overall was very complimentary of the project design and architecture.
Discussion focused on the design of the trash enclosures and direction on any required
backflow preventor and double-check valve assembly.
Commr. Lopes questioned the location of the backflow mechanism and suggested that
CJacarandas be used as an accent tree, rather than the main street tree selection.
Commr. Boudreau suggested an increase in the distance between the two trash
enclosures if feasible.
ARC Minutes
August 21, 2006
Page 2
On motion by Commr. Wilhelm to grant final approval to the proiect, with an .added
condition: 9. If determined to be necessary, the backflow preventor and double-check
assembly shall be located as far back as feasible from the street and screened with
landscaping and a condition to consider -greater distance between the trash enclosures.
Seconded by Commr. Root.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins and Palazzo
NOES: Commr. Lopes
ABSENT: Commr. Howard
ABSTAIN: None
The motion passed on a 5:1 vote.
2. 499 Brizzolara Street. ARC 9-05; Final review of an 8 -unit common interest
subdivision; R -2-S zone; Kelly Gearhart, applicant. (Jaime Hill)
Senior Planner Pam Ricci, presented the staff report recommending final approval to
the project, based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements,
including approval of a 10 -foot street yard for Lot 5.
Jamie Kirk, applicant's representative, clarified some project features and indicated her
availability for questions.
Andy Fetyko, applicant, answered questions pertinent to the project and suggested a
gravel area at the end of the private street with a bench as an appropriate solution to
the design of the common open space area.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The main topic of discussion was the appropriate location and features of a common
open space area near the creek.
.Commr. Root had questions regarding Condition 6 and its significance, and expressed a
desire to see the creek views preserved.
Commr. Wilhelm had concerns with how the common open space amenities related to
the creek setback.
On motion by Commr. Root to grant final approval as recommended by staff, with
added conditions to retain the Magnolia tree and preserve the creek views in addition to
screening the backflow preventor. Seconded by Commr. Wilhelm
ARC Minutes
August 21, 2006
Page 3
AYES: Commrs. Boudreau, Root, Wilhelm, Hopkins, Palazzo and Lopes
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commr. Howard
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried on a 6:0 vote.
3. 899 Hiauera Street. ARC 79-06; Review of a facade remodel to a downtown
building; C -D -H zone; Copeland's Properties, applicant. (To be continued to a
date uncertain) (Jaime Hill)
At the request of the applicant, this item was continued to a date uncertain, without
discussion.
4. 861.8: 953 Orcutt Road. ARC 151-03; Review of a project including 178 dwellings,
a village hall, village green and a creek restoration plan; M -P -D zone; Orcutt
Associates, applicant. (Michael Codron)
Associate Planner Michael Codron presented the staff report recommending final
approval to the project, based on findings and subject to conditions of approval.
Jim Murar, owner, reviewed previous meetings with the public and various agencies,
and described the proposed project, including the varying architectural styles proposed.
Jim Stark, applicant's architect, explained why the applicant would prefer not to make
various changes suggested by staff.
Michael Cripe, landscape architect, discussed the landscape plan, including trees and
other site features.
Pat Brown, project engineer, was available for questions.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The ARC focused their discussion on building design, landscaping and proposed creek
restoration plans. They appreciated the detailed presentation provided by the project
architect and asked several questions regarding the design choices that had been
made. The project includes several different building types (single, duplex, triplex, four-
plex, six-plex and nine-plex) and each building type has at least two different elevation
styles, each with varied colors and exterior materials. Of the 178 units proposed, only
two buildings will be identical in terms of elevation design, colors and materials.
The Commission reviewed all the key issues for consideration including noise barriers,
colors and materials, creek restoration and landscape plans, building design details and
ARC Minutes
August 21, 2006
Page 4
site lighting.
Commr. Lopes asked about noise levels in common use areas and building decks;
asked if there would be various window frame colors to compliment window trimmed
wall colors, and asked about covered entries to units in the four-plex building.
Commr. Root asked if public art would be required and asked about refuse collection
and storage space.
Comms. Hopkins requested additional information on proposed creekside landscaping.
Commr. Wilhelm voiced support for modifying the front entry of the four-plex buildings,
as recommended by Commr. Lopes.
On motion by Comms Palazzo to grant final approval to the proiect based on findings
locations. Seconded by Commr. Hopkins.
AYES: Commrs. Boudreau, Root, Wilhelm, Lopes, Hopkins, and Palazzo
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commr. Howard
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried on a 6:0 vote.
5. Staff
A. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci provided an agenda forecast of items expected on the next meeting agenda.
She noted that the next meeting would be on Tuesday September 5th because of the
Labor Day holiday and that the meeting would be held in the Planning Conference
Room because of a City Council meeting that same night.
6. .Commission:
A. Minutes of August 7, 2006
The minutes of August 7, 2006 were approved as amended with direction to add brief
references to the Commission discussion under "Lessons Learned" at the end of that
meeting.
B. Lessons Learned.
Commr. Lopes questioned the success of the Manse project in terms of incorporating
the historic Pinho house into the design given the scale differential between the historic
building and the new structures.
ARC Minutes
August 21, 2006
Page 5
Commr. Palazzo suggested that it might save paper to use PDFs for plans instead of
large-scale plan sheets.
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. to
the regular meeting of the ARC scheduled for September 5, 2006, at 5:00 p.m., in the
Planning Conference Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by Architectural Review Commission on September 5, 2006.
Diane R. Stuart"CM
Management Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
September 5, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Zeljka Howard, Steve Hopkins, Jim Lopes,
Anthony Palazzo and Chairperson Michael Boudreau
Absent: Commr. Allen Root
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Associate Planner Jaime Hill, and Recording
Secretary Jill Francis
ACEPTANCE.OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 1772 Calle Joaquin: ARC 123-05; Review of plans to construct an unmanned
—' wireless telecommunications facility; C/OS-10 zone; Cingular Wireless, applicant.
(Tyler Corey)
Senior Planner Pam Ricci presented the staff report, recommending final approval
based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements which she outlined.
Jeff Jacobsen, applicant's representative, spoke in support of the project and was
available for questions.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The main topic of discussion was the amount of area available for construction of the
pole and conduits, and the design of the pole.
Commr. Hopkins questioned the size of the facility and the distance to surrounding
structures.
Commr. Lopes noted that the location of the equipment shelter was shown differently on
the civil plan (Sheet C-2) than it was on the architectural plan, and asked how the pole
would be installed and what affect it would have on surrounding plants.
ARC Minutes
September 5, 2006
Page 2
Jeff Jacobson clarified that the architectural site plan showed the equipment shelter
accurately, and that installation details would be reviewed with the City Arborist to
ensure that existing trees were properly protected, per staffs recommended condition.
On motion by Commr. Palazzo to grant final approval, as recommended by staff.
Seconded by Commr. Howard.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Howard, Boudreau, Hopkins, Lopes and Palazzo
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commr. Root
REFRAIN: None
The motion carried on a 6:0 vote.
2. 1037 Murray Avenue. ARC 30-06; Review of plans for a proposed medical office
building, including a request for 35 feet in height where 25 feet is normally allowed,
and related site improvements; O zone; Adam Janette, applicant. (Jaime Hill)
Associate Planner Jaime Hill presented the staff report, recommending final approval of
the project, based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements.
A letter from the owner of 1047-1053 Murray Avenue expressing concerns was
distributed to the Commission.
Pat Blote, RRM Design Group, gave a presentation describing the proposed project.
Adam and Kathy Janette, owners, were available to address any concerns presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The main topics of discussion included the types of light fixtures which would be used,
location of the backflow preventor, finish materials including colors, and impact on the
adjacent property at 1047-1053 Murray.
Commr. Palazzo asked staff to clarify that the proposed building footprint fully complied
with setback standards.
Commr. Howard had a question on the height exception and reiterated the condition
regarding the backflow location and/or shielding.
Commr. Boudreau noted the dense vegetation along the creek corridor on the west side
of the site surrounding the property provides a buffer to the neighboring property.
Commr. Hopkins had questions regarding the lighting plan.
ARC Minutes
September 5, 2006
Page 3
C' Commr. Lopes questioned the type of fixture used for the lighting survey, asked if the
backflow structure could be located inside the building, and discussed wood fencing as
a replacement to the chain link fence proposed to be removed.
Commr. Wilhelm suggested any regaining walls developed with fencing be either
colored split -face block or CMU/cast concrete painted to match the building, that the
colors used on the exterior of the building be lightened, and that the applicant have
dialogue with the neighbors on the locations of trees.
recommending discussions with the neighbor to the east regarding tree locations.
Seconded by Commr. Howard.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Howard, Boudreau, Hopkins, Lopes and Palazzo
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commr. Root
REFRAIN: None
The motion carried on a 6:0 vote.
3. Staff
A. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
4. Commission:
A. Minutes of August 21, 2006
The minutes of August 21, 2006 were approved as amended.
B. Recent Project Review- Lessons Learned
Commr. Howard questioned whether the finishes of the Caltrans sound wall being
constructed along South Street were consistent with the approved plans.
The Commission had a general discussion regarding their role in discussing
enforcement issues. This was precipitated by a concern brought up by Commr. Lopes
with unscreened storage containers in the lower parking area at KSBY that are visible
from Highway 101. The Commission agreed that this was a separate issue from the
antenna installation proposed as part of Item No.1. A motion for staff to follow up on the
enforcement issue was supported on a 4-2 vote (Boudreau & Palazzo voting no).
ARC Minutes
September 5, 2006
Page 4
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. to
the regular meeting of the ARC scheduled for Monday, September 15, 2006, at 5:00
p.m., in the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by Architectural Review Commission on September 18, 2006.
Diane R. Stuart, CM
Management Assistant
_ SAN LUIS OBISPO
i ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
September 18, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Zeljka Howard, Steve Hopkins, Anthony
Palazzo, Jim Lopes, Vice -Chair Allen Root and Chairperson Michael
Boudreau
Absent: None
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore and
Recording Secretary Jill Francis
ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
Since the applicants for Item # 1 were late, staff presented an overview of the ARC
Goals and Financial Plan Schedule for 2007-2009 prior to the two public hearing items.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
Pierre Rademaker spoke to the presentation on Goal -Setting regarding nurturing the
broader urban design goals of the ARC such as street tree planting, median designs,
` and coordinating with other agencies on mutually -beneficial projects.
There were no further comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
151 N. Santa Rosa Street: ARC 238-05; Review of a remodel of an existing
service station; C -R -S zone; Chevron Products Co., applicant (Phil Dunsmore)
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore, presented the staff report, recommending the
Commission approve the design of the remodel, based on findings, and subject to
conditions and code requirements. He noted the only further change needed is an
added feature to the fuel island canopy to tie it in with the building.
Tam Fenner and John Mably, applicant's representatives, spoke in support of the
request and were available for questions.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Commission discussed the previous ARC comments and how the applicant has
modified the project.
ARC Minutes
September 18, 2006
Page 2
Commr. Lopes questioned the proposed colors and types of street trees.
Commr. Boudreau asked if a the roof had been considered, and was told that the
building could not structurally support the weight of tiles.
On motion by Commr. Lopes to approve the design of the remodel, based on findings
and subject to conditions recommended by staff. Seconded by Commr. Root.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Howard, Root, Boudreau, Lopes, Hopkins and Palazzo
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
REFRAIN: None
The motion carried on a 7:0 vote.
2. 4450 and 4460 Broad Street. ARC 194-05; Review of a proposed sign program for
a business park development including a total of 74,883 sq. ft. of new commercial
floor area; C -S zone; VFP- Broad Street, LLC, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report including an extensive
presentation regarding the characteristics of each of the signs, recommending approval
of a modified sign program based on findings and subject to conditions which he
outlined.
Pierre Rademaker summarized the various components of the sign proposal.
Fred Vemacchia, applicant, provided an extensive presentation in an attempt to justify
the use of a large pole sign with an electronic message center (EMC) and explained
the need for the proposed signage, noting that the ARC can approve signs that do not
meet the City guidelines. He explained how the sign program decreases street signage
from three or four monument signs to one pole/EMC sign and two vehicle entry signs
and decreases wall signage. He did not feel that approval would set a precedent for
future projects.
Brian Starr and Will Drake, applicant's representatives, answered questions regarding
street trees.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Commission discussed the Sign Regulations and proposed sign program at length
n in order to understand their purview. Commissioners agreed with staff that the large
EMC is not appropriate at this location and not appropriate in the City of SLO.
Commissioners felt that EMC's should be reserved for public uses or for clocks and
ARC Minutes
September 18, 2006
Page 3
thermometers. As a compromise the ARC allowed the sign program to have two
monument signs and a 12 -foot tall pole/monument sign at the Broad Street frontage.
Commr. Howard stated that the proposed signs were attractively designed but
expressed reservations with the pole/EMC sign and its necessity given the type of
project and its location near the airport.
Commr. Wilhelm asked about consistency with the Community Design Guidelines and
the Sign Regulations regarding this sign program and how it could affect future projects
if approved. He felt the project had an attractive and appropriate sign package but
expressed reservations with the EMC sign and its potential to set an undesirable
precedent.
Commr. Palazzo asked if street trees would be altered to adjust for the EMC sign, and
noted this was a good sign program that worked for the site, including the EMC.
Commr. Lopes expressed the need to follow City regulations and agreed with staffs
recommendations. He questioned the compatibility of proposed signs with the
architecture of approved buildings and encouraged their redesign.
Commr. Hopkins felt the sign program was well designed but had reservations about
the EMC sign since it did not seem to have a functional relationship to the project.
Commr. Root discussed the impact of various signs and the need for the City to have
sign programs. He agreed with staffs proposal but not with the motion presented.
Chair Boudreau concurred with staff recommendations with the inclusion of a pole sign,
without the electronic message board.
On a motion by Commr. Howard to approve a modified sign program based on findings
sq. ft. Seconded by Commr. Lopes.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Howard, Boudreau, Lopes, and Hopkins
NOES: Commrs. Root and Palazzo
ABSENT: None
REFRAIN: None
Commissioners Palazzo and Root cast the dissenting votes; Palazzo felt that an EMC
could have been incorporated into the sign program and Root felt that the applicant
should have a larger pole sign but no EMC.
The motion carried on a 5:2 vote.
3. Staff
A. Agenda Forecast
ARC Minutes
September 18, 2006
Page 4
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
B. ARC Goals and Financial Plan Schedule for 2007-09
The Commission discussed their goals from the 2005-2007 budget cycle and made
some revisions. They asked staff to include a modified version of the goals in their next
agenda packet. They were also interested in reviewing the goals once more after a
consolidated version of the goals of all the advisory bodies is assembled.
A PowerPoint presentation on ARC Goal -Setting and Budget Process for 2007 to 2009
was given to the Commission. Having "affordable -by -design" examples in the Design
Guidelines was recommended as a priority goal.
4. Commission:
A. Minutes of September 5, 2006
The minutes of September 5, 2006 were approved as submitted.
B. Recent Project Review- Lessons Learned
The Commission discussed setting time limits for applicants in making their
presentations and recommended that PowerPoint slides not be read word for word.
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. to
the regular meeting of the ARC scheduled for Monday, October 2, 2006, at 5:00 p.m., in
the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by Architectural Review Commission on October 2, 2006.
Diane R. Stuart, CM '
Management Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
_ October 2, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, Anthony
Palazzo, Vice -Chair Allen Root and Chairperson Michael Boudreau
Absent: Commissioner Steve Hopkins
Staff: Deputy Director Doug Davidson, Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Associate
Planners Phil Dunsmore and Michael Codron, Deputy Director Kim Murry
and Recording Secretary Jill Francis
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC ITEMS:
1. 892 Aerovista Place. ARC 73-06; Conceptual review of a new auto dealership; BP
zone; Smith Volvo, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report with a recommendation to
continue the item to a date uncertain and recommend design refinements to the project
for consistency with the Airport Area Specific Plan, the Council approved planned
development for the site and use permit conditions.
Warren Hamrick, applicant's representative, reviewed the standards described in the
staff report.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no further comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Wilhelm questioned the condition regarding pedestrian access from the street;
asked about various design elements, and supported the design given the location and
purpose of the project.
Commr. Lopes questioned the site layout, and suggested the main building be at a
higher elevation.
Commr. Root questioned the parking spaces and basic layout.
ARC Minutes
October 2, 2006
Page 2
Commr. Howard asked if the design of the showroom and outdoor vehicle display could
be switched.
Commr. Boudreau discussed the roof type, building design, and lighting plan and
intensity.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Howard, Root, Boudreau, Lopes, Palazzo
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commr. Hopkins
REFRAIN: None
The motion carried on a 6:0 vote.
2. Downtown Core Area. GPA 50-06; Discussion of possible General Plan
amendments to revise policies and programs relating to downtown building height
and intensity limits; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Michael Codron)
Associate Planner Michael Codron presented the staff report recommending the
Commission 1) Discuss current Land Use Element policies and Community Design
Guidelines requirements that promote a pedestrian environment downtown in
relationship to policies for view protection downtown, and recommend a strategy for
clarifying policy inconsistencies; 2) Discuss current building height and intensity limits
for downtown and consider alternatives for a moderate increase to these limits,
including a revised Floor Area Ratio (FAR) definition and potential increases to current
FAR and building height limits; 3) Discuss the components of a possible "landmark
building" use permit process, including a size threshold to establish which new projects
would be subject to the use permit requirement; and 4) Discuss the Community Design
Guidelines for Downtown and provide direction to staff to return to the ARC with
recommendations on new guidelines for using architectural transitions between
buildings to integrate existing, small-scale buildings with new development.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Dale Sutcliff, San Luis Obispo, presented the Commission with a two page letter
outlining recommendations for the commission to consider, and also discussed
Community Goals for Downtown, public spaces, and view protection.
Hamish Marshall, San Luis Obispo, felt restrictions on potential future projects could be
too limiting, and that flexibility is as important as the Downtown Historic nature.
ARC Minutes
October 2, 2006
Page 3
Ken Schwartz, San Luis Obispo, asked what the main focus for the Downtown core
should be, noting that strict restrictions and limitations would limit design possibilities
and forward thinking.
Shawn Fitzgerald, 1570 Shiloh Place, Templeton, had concerns that new buildings
would not provide housing for downtown employees.
Sandy Baer, San Luis Obispo, expressed concerns with the vague long-range plans for
the Downtown area.
John Ashbaugh, San Luis Obispo, discussed the preservation of downtown views and::
the need for blending historic buildings with appropriate new structures..
Fred Vemacchia, San Luis Obispo, felt the city should have a plot map reflecting the
height requirements for each area and particular definitions.
Patricia Wilmore, representative for the Chamber of Commerce, outlined the Chamber's
recommendations.
Bruce Silverberg, San Luis Obispo, said that we should look to the future and not
restrict design possibilities.
Craig Losee, San Luis Obispo, asked if apartments would be built.
There were no further comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Wilhelm asked if the height restriction changes pertained only to the Downtown
core; the response was yes.
Commr. Howard discussed the large picture when looking at a new Downtown Plan and
expressed concern with particular height restrictions.
Commr. Lopes suggested that there be limitations on height in areas where views need
to be protected, and that more review and study be conducted before any changes are
made to the guidelines.
Commr. Palazzo was of the opinion that the Commission should focus on the next 10
years and not restrict design and height in a blanket restriction.
Commr. Boudreau suggested that amenities provided by projects could be awarded
with additional building height.
�' By consensus, the ARC provided the following direction and feedback to staff:
ARC Minutes
October 2, 2006
Page 4
�= 1. The ARC supports increasing the base height for new buildings downtown to
between 55 and 60 feet considering the following items 2 through 5.
2. The ARC supports increasing the Floor Area Ratio limit to 3.75, with limiting
factors. The maximum FAR should be limited to maintain appropriate building
height to street width ratios, to maintain consistency with the context of the site,
and to maintain an appropriate relationship to adjacent buildings.
3. The ARC supports the following revised definition for Floor Area Ratio:
"The floor area of a building or buildings on a lot divided by the lot area. In
calculating FAR, floor area shall mean the conditioned floor area of the
building(s) (as defined by Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations),
excluding parking garages and basements, provided the finish floor elevation of
the first floor is less than 30" above sidewalk grade."
4. The ARC provided direction to staff to consider the current definition of building
height as it applies downtown on sloped sites.
5. The ARC supports a use permit process for buildings above the base height. A
tall building use permit process should be used to encourage design amenities
and features in tall buildings, such as:
• The project is designed to exceed Title 24 requirements by a minimum of
5% and meets the solar access standards provided in Table 2 of the
Conservation and Open Space Element;
• The project provides for an adaptive reuse of a historical resource in a
manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation;
• The project provides a public viewing deck or similar feature to provide
public access to views of surrounding natural features such as Cerro San
Luis;
• Minimum residential component of 18 -units per acre;
• Inclusionary housing requirement is met on-site\;
• Project provides public plaza, with seating and public art;
• Project provides major pedestrian connection between Higuera Street and
the Creekwalk, Monterey Street and the Creekwalk, or between Higuera
Street and Marsh Street at a mid -block location;
• Project plans are certified to meet Silver LEED or equivalent;
ARC Minutes
October 2, 2006
Page 5
�^ Project meets the City's definition of "affordable by design"; and
The project involves a public/private partnership with the purpose of
providing affordable housing
6. The ARC supports view protection from public spaces, and recommended that the
City pursue a study of important views downtown that should be protected.
7. The ARC established a sub -committee made up of Chairman Michael Boudreau,
Jim Lopes and Anthony Palazzo to work with staff on an update to the Design
Guidelines to include guidelines on architectural transitions between existing and
new development.
COMMENT & DISCUSSION:
3. Staff:
A. Agenda Forecast
B. Revised ARC Goals for 2007-2009 were amended.
Senior Planner Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
4. Commission:
A. Minutes: September 18, 2006
The minutes of September 18, 2006 were approved as amended.
B. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:34
p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for October 16, 2006 at 5:00 p.m. in the
Council Hearing Room, at City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on October 16, 2006.
C
�_ . ��
1 �M�
Diane R. Stuart; CM
Management Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
October 16, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Zeljka_Howard, Greg Wilhelm, Steve Hopkins, Vice -Chair
Allen Root and Chairperson Michael Boudreau
Absent: Commrs. Jim Lopes and Anthony Palazzo
Staff: Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore and Recording Secretary Jill Francis
ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 157 Higuera Street: ARC 139-06; Review of a replacement service station canopy;
C -S -MU zone; John Karimaghayi, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report, recommending approval of
a modified canopy design, incorporating changes recommended by staff, based on
findings, and subject to conditions and code requirements.
John Karimaghayi, applicant, spoke in support of his request, explained why he needs a
flat roof instead of the slopped canopy design recommended by staff, and expressed
the need to keep the cost down (estimated at $53,000) since it will be absorbed by him.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Wilhelm supported the flat roof design because of its simplicity.
Commr. Howard supported the flat roof with possibly an improved design.
ARC Minutes
October 16, 2006
Page 2
Commr. Root would like to see an improved design.
The recommendation from staff was for the design of the canopy to complement the
convenience store with a sloped roof, gable ends and a fascia not to exceed 12 -inches
in width. It was the consensus of the Commission that the recommendation could not be
approved because of requirements made by Union 76 corporate office to the applicant.
The materials to be used on the new sign, sign design and surrounding plantings were
discussed
The Commission felt the canopy stands alone/separate from the station itself and
supported the plans presented with a flat roof and removal of condition #7, adding the
condition to paint the area -that currently has the Food Mart sign to match the new
canopy.
Commissioners commented that they preferred the applicant's choice to incorporate a
flat canopy rather than a gable roof structure recommended by staff. Commissioners
briefly discussed the site and vicinity and felt that the proposed canopy was appropriate
for the site and suited the land use
On a motion by Wilhelm, the Commission approved the design of a replacement fuel
island canopy and a new monument sign. Seconded by Commr. Root.
AYES: Commrs. Root, Boudreau, Hopkins, Howard and Wilhelm
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Lopes, Palazzo
RECUSED: None
The motion carred on a 5:0 vote.
2. Staff
A. Agenda Forecast
Phil Dunsmore gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
3. Commission:
A. The minutes of October 2, 2006 were approved as amended.
B. Recent Project Review- Lessons Learned — None discussed
ARC Minutes
October 16, 2006
Page 3
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m. to
the regular meeting of the ARC scheduled for Monday, November 6, 2006, at 5`00 p.m.,
in the Council Chamber at City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by Architectural Review Commission on November 6, 2006.
Diane R. Stuart, CM
Management Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
November 6, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Zeljka Howard, Steve Hopkins, Jim Lopes,
Anthony Palazzo, Vice -Chairperson Allen Root and Chairperson Michael
Boudreau
Absent: None
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore and
Recording Secretary Jill Francis
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 1525 Calle Joaquin. ARC and ER 52 -06; Review of a proposed 84 -room hotel,
site improvements, and environmental review; C -T zone; Jim Flagg, applicant. ( Phil
Dunsmore)
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report recommending the
Commission grant final approval to the building and site design to allow construction of
the 84 -room hotel subject to findings, conditions and code requirements, and adopt a
Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. He gave a detailed presentation
describing the complex site plan, and answered commissioner questions regarding the
project.
Jim Flagg, applicant's representative, was available for questions.
Jeff Polaski, architect for the representative, responded to issues raised in the agenda
report focusing on the roofline, window design, awnings, stucco finish of the building,
and signage.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Commission discussed the architectural details of the project and expressed overall
satisfaction with the general design theme, and agreed that the design theme should
emphasize a Craftsmen motif and that the window treatment, trim, wainscot and other
exterior details should be strengthened to express the Craftsmen theme.
ARC Minutes
November 6, 2006
Page 2
Commr. Lopes asked staff for clarification on drainage and the condition calling for
additional trees in the landscaping plan, and expressed a concern for comprehensive
planning of the vicinity including accommodations for pedestrian connections to other
properties.
Commr. Boudreau asked about plans to improve the Highway 101 on/off ramp and the
current layout, and suggested a more significant wainscoting.
Cornmr. Wilhelm agreed with the architect's proposed window detail and suggested that
kickbacks be more frequently used as a detail and that a darker stucco color be used on
the tower.
Commr. Palazzo suggested using different Craftsman features such as tapered
columns, a less boxy cornice detail, enhanced window trim on key windows, and darker
tones.
Commr. Root suggested using rounded vs. stacked stone for the base and more vibrant
colors.
On motion by Commr. Lopes. to approve the oroiect and environmental document, with
modifications to the exterior treatment including the use of a sand or skip troweled
stucco finish, rounded wainscot rock instead of flat, deeper color tones, and changes to
the window style to utilize upper divided lights in a Craftsmen style. Seconded by
Palazzo.
AYES: Commrs. Lopes, Palazzo, Hopkins, Wilhelm, Howard, Root, Boudreau
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: None
The motion carried on a 7:0 vote.
2. 800 Palm Street. ARC and ER 187-05; Review of a mixed-use project in
conjunction with the Ah Louis Store, and environmental review; C -D -H zone; Dr.
William Watson, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Commissioner Howard recused herself due to a potential conflict of interest.
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report, recommending the
Commission grant final approval to the project and environmental document, based on
findings and subject to conditions, mitigation measures, and code requirements. Staff
refined the presentation to discuss the previous direction from ARC and described how
the project has been modified to respond to the direction, discussed the proposed
mitigation measures, and recommended the incorporation of two residential units rather
than one.
ARC Minutes
November 6, 2006
Page 3
Glen Wood, applicant's representative, addressed concerns brought up in the staff
report.
Bob Richmond, applicant's representative, asked the Commission for flexibility on the
ultimate design of the residential unit(s).
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
David Brodie, SLO, retired professor of Architecture, felt the Ah Louis building should be
separate from the new project, possibly with a bridge and with more contrasting colors.
Allan Cooper, San Luis Obispo, supported the changes from the earlier presentation but
suggested that the fourth floor facing Chorro Street be set back further and incorporate
housing.
Dan Krieger, San Luis Obispo, discussed the size and mass of the project and its
historical concerns.
There were no further comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Commission discussed potential overlook, and the architectural details of the
project. With the exception of Commissioner Lopes expressing concerning regarding
building height and massing, the ARC expressed satisfaction with the design
refinements.
Commr. Wilhelm questioned which level the residential units would be located on,
expressed that he likes the intense feel of the project and the way it surrounds the Ah
Louis building, and suggested a darker color for the cantilevered portion of the Chorro
Street elevation
Commr. Lopes discussed the condition regarding the trellis on the west elevation of the
4th story deck, as well as the proposed roofing material. He questioned whether a deck
instead of a small balcony would be possible on Chorro Street, and expressed that
more changes are necessary to tie in with the Ah Louis store and improve the scope of
the project. He stated that the new building is still out of scale and will overwhelm the
Ah Louis building, and noted the 4th floor should be set back further on Chorro and Palm
Streets.
Commr. Root supported the revised project plans noting that he liked the scale of the
building and the way it "insulates" the Ah Louis building from the parking structure. He
agreed with the larger windows on Chorro Street and the design of the plaza.
Commr. Hopkins felt the applicants did a good job addressing the ARC's concerns and
voiced support for the project.
ARC Minutes
November 6, 2006
Page 4
Commr. Boudreau supported the revised project, including the proposal to include a
single residential unit.
On motion by Comm. Wilhelm to approve the voiect as proposed, including asking the
applicant to consider two residential units. The motion excluded changes to the Chorro
Street windows as recommended in the report prepared by Alexandria Cole. Seconded
by Commr. Hopkins.
AYES:
Commrs. Hopkins, Palazzo, Root, Wilhelm, Boudreau
NOES:
Commr. Lopes
RECUSED:
Commr. Howard
ABSENT:
None
The motion carried on a 5:1 vote.
On motion by Commr. Lopes to have staff return with a legislative draft, including
changes to the guidelines for downtown buildings related to the transparency of window
Id reauire
Seconded by Commr. Hopkins.
AYES: Commrs. Hopkins, Palazzo, Root, Wilhelm, Lopes and Boudreau
NOES: None
RECUSED: Commr. Howard
ABSENT: None
The motion carried on a 6:0 vote.
3. Staff:
A. Agenda Forecast
Senior Planner Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
4. Commission:
A. Minutes: October 16, 2006
The minutes of October 16, 2006 were approved as submitted.
B. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned
ARC Minutes
November 6, 2006
Page 5
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:05
p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for November 20, 2006 at 5:00 p.m. in the
Council Hearing Room, at City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on November 20, 2006.
Diane R. Stuart,
Management Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
November 20, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, Anthony
Palazzo, Vice -Chairperson Allen Root and Chairperson Michael Boudreau
Absent: Commr. Steve Hopkins
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore, Associate
Planner Jaime Hill and Recording Secretary Jill Francis
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
303 Del Mar Court ARC MI 146-05; Review of a new single-family home on a
sensitive site; R-1 zone; Tomas Schoff, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
2. 307 Del Mar Court. ARC NU 147-05; Review of a new single-family home on a
sensitive site; R-1 zone; Tomas Schoff, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Items 1 and 2 were considered together as a single project
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the project and notified the Commissioners
and public that there had been a notification error. Based on the notification error, staff
recommended the project be continued to the December 4t' hearing date so that the
project may be re -noticed.
Tomas Schoff, applicant, was available for questions.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Scott McCrerey, representing his mother who' lives at 311 Del Mar Court, expressed
concerns with drainage and possible flooding.
Joe Sarye, 53 Rafael Street, also had concerns with drainage on the two sites and how
it affects surrounding properties.
Bernard Rademacher, 298 Del Mar Court, noted that at a previous neighborhood
meeting the applicant had agreed to submit a drainage plan; and expressed concern
that it was not received.
There were no further comments made from the public..
ARC Minutes
November 20, 2006
Page 2
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Wilhelm asked staff if the new design met the City's code requirements and
would be appropriate for the sites.
Commr. Lopes brought up concerns about possible multiple student use.
Based on public testimony, the ARC asked staff to clarify the site drainage at the next
hearing, and by consensus continued both items to the December 4t' hearin-g.
3. 899 Hiauera Street. ARC 79-06; Review of a fagade remodel to a downtown
building (formerly Structures) including new storefronts and removal of Morro
Street windows; C -D -H zone; Copeland Properties, applicant. (Jaime Hill)
Associate Planner Jaime Hill presented the staff report, focusing on the history of the
project, Cultural Heritage Commission (CHC) direction, and the remaining issues
discussed in the staff report, and recommended final approval to the project based on
findings, and subject to conditions to insure the project will not impact the historic,.
architectural, or aesthetic cohesiveness of the historic district, and is consistent with the
Community Design Guidelines.
Mark Rawson, applicant, explained the difficulties of leasing the narrow tenant space
and the space requirements of national retailers.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Javier Cadena, downtown business owner, was in support of the Copeland proposal
with two entrances on Higuera.
There were no further comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
While there was some discussion of the all -glass storefront systems and absence of
bulkheads, the discussion focused on the proposal to in -fill the Morro Street windows
with brickwork. Commissioners discussed which of the windows were important to keep
clear, either those near the comer or further down Morro Street, and if treatments other
than brick in -fill would be more appropriate. Ultimately, the Commission determined that
it was preferable to allow the applicant options as to which of the windows were
obscured, and required that three of the six windows on this facade be kept transparent.
They directed that the other three window be sandblasted and indirectly back -lit from
above or the side.
Commr. Lopes mentioned the security benefits to having windows along the street
frontage because they allow for public views into the space and provide a comfort level
ARC Minutes
November 20, 2006
Page 3
for pedestrians on the sidewalk. He suggested a tenant space with a separate entry on
Morro Street be considered.
Commr. Wilhelm asked about window front standards and glass used on other buildings
on Higuera Street, questioned the reason for obscuring the windows at the comer of
Morro and Higuera Streets, and suggested an alternative to bricking in the first three
windows on Morro Street.
Commr. Root asked why the previous tenants had a problem with the store spaces,
suggested at least two of the windows be of a material other than brick, and questioned
retaining the awnings if the windows are eliminated.
Commr. Boudreau asked if the existing upper windows were clear, questioned the
problems with leasing the space as it is, and suggested a variation to the design as a
compromise.
Commr. Palazzo discussed the Design Guidelines and how they relate to window
displays and their depth. He agreed with the applicant regarding the need for wall space
but would like to see an alternate material used instead of brick.
Commr. Howard stated she could not support bricking in the first three windows on
Morro Street.
On motion by Commr. Wilhelm, to grant final project approval, with conditions modified
so that three windows remain unobscured, consistent with the Community Desiqn
Guidelines. Seconded by Commr. Lopes.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Boudreau, and Palazzo
NOES: Commrs. Howard, Lopes
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commr. Hopkins
The motion carried on a 4:2 vote.
Commissioner Lopes made a second motion, seconded by Commissioner Howard, to
require the existing brick -infill window on Morro Street to be modified. It was determined
that the ARC had already made their final action, and this motion was not voted on.
4. Staff:
A. Agenda Forecast
Senior Planner Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
5. Commission:
ARC Minutes
November 20, 2006
Page 4
A. Minutes: November 6, 2006
The minutes of November 6, 2006 were approved as amended.
B. Recent Project Review Lessons Learned
The Commission had a general discussion regarding the issue of maintaining clear
windows within the ground floors of tenant spaces in the downtown. In light of this,
there was further discussion regarding changes in the downtown and trends in retailing
that affect how tenant spaces are used. Allen Root brought up the idea of a possible
charette to discuss the issue in more detail. The Commission continued to express a
desire to modify the guidelines to strengthen the requirements to maintain open views
into ground floor tenant spaces. The ARC members were encouraged to take photos of
storefronts of tenant spaces that they felt were consistent with guideline goals for future
discussions. Commr. Palazzo suggested that speck criteria be drafted to provide
guidance on when exceptions to the guidelines might be supported.
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:00
p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for December 4, 2006 at 5:00 p.m. in the
Council Hearing Room, at City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on December 4, 2006.
Diane. R. Stuart, W
Management Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
December 4, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Zeljka Howard, Steve Hopkins, Jim Lopes,
Anthony Palazzo, Vice -Chairperson Allen Root and Chairperson Michael
Boudreau
Absent: None
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore, Planning
Technician Brian Leveille, Supervising Civil Engineer Rob Livick and
Recording Secretary Jill Francis
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
SPECIAL PRESENTATION:
Update on Advisory Body Recruitment. (Audrey Hooper, City Clerk)
Audrey Hooper, City Clerk, discussed upcoming vacancies on the advisory bodies.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 303 Del Mar Court. ARC MI 146-05; Review of a new single-family home on a
sensitive site; R-1 zone; Tomas Schoff, applicant. (Continued from November 20,
2006) ( Phil Dunsmore)
2. 307 Del Mar Court. ARC MI 147-05; Review of a new single-family home on a
sensitive site; R-1 zone; Tomas Schoff, applicant. (Continued from November 20,
2006) (Phil Dunsmore)
Items 1 and 2 were considered together, as one project.
Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report and a brief photo display of
the project, displaying the neighborhood and the plans for both 303 and 307 Del Mar
Court. Staff discussed the basis for the ARC's review of two new single family residences,
and recommended approval based on findings and subject to conditions and code
requirements.
Rob Livick, Supervising Civil Engineer, described the current drainage flow pattern and
explained how it would be affected by the new proposal.
ARC Minutes
December 4, 2006
Page 2
Tomas Schoff, applicant, spoke in support of his project, and was available for
questions.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Steve Spratt, 295 Del Mar Court, SLO, expressed concerns with drainage impacts and
possible weakening of his driveway, and with massing and planned uses of the houses.
There were no further comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Discussion focused on site drainage and other site planning issues.
Commr. Lopes questioned whether there would be a retaining wall as part of this
project, and noted that the project has the coordinated design of a condominium project
and questioned its appropriateness at the site. He suggested moving the front house
further back from the driveway, more planting around the trash area of the front house,
and different plants/trees that could be used in the landscaping.
Commr. Root questioned the location of a bathtub off the living room.
Commr. Hopkins supported the project as it relates to the lot usage and design.
Commr. Wilhelm supported the project with proposed changes and conditions.
In discussion after the initial motion, the ARC added a condition to require greater variation
in color between the two residences and asked the applicant to provide additional
landscape treatment around the trash enclosure of the front house closest to the street.
AYES: Commrs. Lopes, Palazzo, Hopkins, Wilhelm, Howard, Root, Boudreau
NOES: None
REFRAIN: None
ABSENT: None
The motion carried on a 7:0 vote.
3. 1043 Ella Street. ARC 21-06; Review of a 16 -unit condominium conversion project;
R-2 zone; Brian Rolph, applicant. (Brian Leveille)
Planning Technician Brian Leveille presented the staff report, recommending the
Commission continue the project to a date uncertain with direction. He explained that
the project will come back to the ARC for final approval once the tract map has been
ARC Minutes
December 4, 2006
Page 3
approved by the City Council, following a recommendation by the Planning
Commission.
Brian Rolph, applicant, was available for questions and gave a presentation including
amended plans, and discussed the recommended conditions item by item.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Commission felt that certain concessions were appropriate and would keep the
units more affordable, given that the project is a conversion, rather than new
condominium proposal. These concessions included not recommending that covered
parking be required to maintain open view corridors, and allowing the same general
parking configuration that now exists with additional planters. In general, the
Commission was supportive of the applicant's efforts to improve the appearance of site
buildings with an extensive facelift including a new roof system with dormers, new
cement siding and new windows. The project would also improve the appearance of
the site with extensive landscaping additions and new pedestrian pathways. The ARC
will review the project for final architectural approval after the Planning Commission and
City Council consider the required tentative tract map.
Commr. Root asked the applicant about the common use laundry facility, and discussed
the widening of the existing sidewalk and its ramifications.
Commr. Lopes asked staff for an explanation on combined total open space.
Commr. Boudreau discussed concerns with finding a balance between maintaining
parking spaces and providing additional landscaping in the parking lot to more closely
meet standards in the existing parking lot.
Commr. Howard asked for clarification on the location and design of the proposed trash
enclosure.
Commr. Palazzo asked the applicant about the difference between the height of the
current buildings and the new buildings.
Commr. Hopkins asked the applicant for clarification on the design of the balconies.
Commr. Wilhelm asked the applicant if the dormers were functional, suggested a
different shutter design and different dormer locations between the windows and higher
up on the roof, and noted that some kind of privacy screen would be necessary between
the balconies.
ARC Minutes
December 4, 2006
Page 4
On motion by Commr. Lopes to continue action on the project to a date uncertain, with
direction. Seconded by Commr. Palazzo.
AYES: Commrs. Lopes, Hopkins, Howard, Palazzo, Root, Wilhelm, Boudreau
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: None
The motion carried on a 7:0 vote.
3. Staff:
A. Agenda Forecast - Pam Ricci gave an overview of upcoming projects for the
December 4 & 18th ARC hearings. She mentioned that the meetings on
December 18"' & January 22nd would be held in the Council Chamber, rather
than the Hearing Room because the CHC would also be meeting on those same
nights.
B. Rawson Appeal — Pam noted that an appeal of the ARC's December 4d'
approval of the facade remodel for the former Structure tenant space at 899
Higuera had been filed by Mark Rawson as the representative for Copeland's
Properties.
C. South Broad Street Corridor Focus Group Representative — Anthony Palazzo
volunteered to serve as the representative from the ARC.
D. Mandatory Ethics Training — Pam reminded the Commission of their mandatory
training on December 13th at the Board of Supervisors Chamber from 5:00-7:00
p.m.
E. Budget Goals - Pam distributed the consolidated budget goals of all the
advisory boards to the Commission. There was a brief discussion about some
of the groups that had related or overlapping goals. The Commission requested
that there be time set aside on December 18d' to discuss whether there was a
desire to make any further changes to their goals after they had an opportunity
to review the consolidated goals in more detail.
F. Tree Committee Representative — Pam mentioned that the Commissioners
begin thinking about their interest in serving on the Tree Committee since there
would be an opening when Commr. Lopes' term ends at the end of March.
4. Commission:
A. Minutes: November 20, 2006
The minutes of November 20, 2006 were approved as amended.
ARC Minutes
December 4, 2006
Page 5
B. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned
Commr. Lopes expressed disappointment with some of the details for the new Housing
Authority project at the comer of Johnson and Ella Streets, including the lack of a finish
on the trash enclosures and the drab building colors.
Commr. Palazzo reiterated the importance of having colors and materials boards with
actual samples, rather than color photo copies as a substitution.
Commr. Howard mentioned that the height of the fences of the new residential project at
the comer of Foothill and Tassajara did not provide much privacy for outdoor use.
The Commission suggested that members come to the next meeting with photos of
window displays that they consider as good examples in anticipation of the appeal
discussion of the 899 Higuera project at the Council.
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:18
p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for December 18, 2006 at 5:00 p.m. in the
- . Council Chamber, at City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on December 18, 2006.
DianeR. Stuart, CM
Management Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
December 18, 2006
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Steven Hopkins, Jim Lopes, Vice -Chair
Allen Root, and Chairperson Michael Boudreau -
Absent: Commissioners Zeljka Howard and Anthony Palazzo
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Engineering Assistant Jennifer Lawrence,
Parks and Recreation Director Betsy Kiser, and Recording Secretary Jill
Francis
ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 3971 So. Hiauera Street. ARC PA 165-06; Review of a new fountain and sculpture
as proposed public art; C -C zone; M. Timm Development, applicant. (Phil
Dunsmore)
Senior Planner Pam Ricci, presented the staff report, recommending the Commission
find that the proposed artwork meets the City's Guidelines for Public Art in Private
Development, and approve the project based on findings, and subject to conditions.
Chris Williams of Kornreich Architects and co -designer of the proposed art piece
explained that it would be placed within the main outdoor dining area of a new food
court directly north of the Trader Joe's store. He described that the sound of the
fountain would help attenuate auto noise and was intended to evoke surrounding
natural features and the erosion process.
Jeff Thies, co -designer, described the materials and possible lighting to be used in the
project, and the brass plaque proposed to be mounted on the art piece.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
ARC Minutes
December 18, 2006
Page 2
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commission discussion focused on ways to follow the public art jury's recommendation
to incorporate features of the sculpture in the low block wall surrounding the sculpture
and fountain. After extensive discussion about a variety of techniques including
alternative materials for the wall and using the slate tile of the base of the fountain pool
as a wall cap, the ARC ultimately -altered a condition of approval that the plaque design
for the piece coordinate with the artwork and be integrated with the top of the wall.
Commr. Lopes questioned the visibility of the piece from public streets. Pam Ricci
clarified that the criterion indicates that pieces "be clearly visible in an area open and
freely available to the general public on a consistent basis". He expressed concerns
with water spraying out from the fountain with the prevailing winds at the site and
creating a possible safety hazard with overspray on the surrounding walkways. He
thought that there was a need for a condition keeping customers from moving chairs
and tables too close to the fountain so that a free and clear path was maintained.
Commr. Wilhelm asked about the design and the location of the pumps for the fountain,
which Jeff Thies explained would be located within the sculpture. He suggested that a
fluted block or site -cast and bush -hammered concrete be considered as alternative
materials to the proposed split -face concrete block for the perimeter wall.
Commr. Root thought it was important that the piece's perimeter wall design tie in with
other walls on the site in terms of materials. He introduced the idea of protruding metal
pieces being included along the cap of the wall to respond to the art jury's
recommendation for tying the designs of the wall and art piece together more.
Commr. Hopkins supported the design and agreed with the concept that the plaque
could be used to tie the wall and sculpture designs together.
Commr. Boudreau agreed that non -slip surfaces should surround the fountain where
necessary for public safety, and suggested a modification to Condition #4 to incorporate
a plaque into the design to better integrate the design of the wall with the art piece.
On motion by Commr. Wilhelm to find that the or000sed art niece met the City's criteria
for public art and approve its installation with a modification to Condition # 4 to design
the plague to coordinate with the artwork and integrate it with the top of the wall
Seconded by Commr. Root.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins, Lopes
NOES: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Howard and Palazzo
The motion passed on a 5:0 vote.
ARC Minutes
December 18, 2006
Page 3
2. 902 Southwood Drive. ARC PA 168-06; Review of proposed public art at the SLO
Swim Center children's/therapy pool; PF zone; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant.
(Jaime Hill)
Senior Planner Pam Ricci, presented the staff report, recommending the Commission
find that the proposed artwork meets the City's Public Art Guidelines and approve the
project.
Jennifer Lawrence, Project Manager, spoke in support of the project and was available
for questions.
Betsy Kiser, Public Art Coordinator and Parks and Recreation Director, was also
available for questions.
Michael Laboon, Project Designer, Shell Beach, spoke in support of the art piece and
was available for questions.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:.
The ARC reviewed an example of the tile work proposed in the proposed wall -mounted
art piece or triptych, a term used to describe the distinctive style of three tile panels, and .
was very impressed with the beauty and craftsmanship. The only concern raised by the
ARC with the piece was its accessibility to the public since it would be located within a
fenced compound surrounding the pools
Commr. Wilhelm asked staff if part of the fencing could be removed for more visibility for
the art project. Staff responded that it was a possibility and would explore it further.
On a motion by Commr. Root to find that the proposed art piece met the City's criteria
Seconded by Commr. Wilhelm.
AYES: Commrs. Boudreau, Root, Wilhelm, Lopes & Hopkins
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Howard and Palazzo
The motion carried on a 5-0 vote.
3. 1617 Santa Rosa Street. MOD/ARC MI 19-06; Review of modifications to an
approved addition (enclosed porch/roof deck) to the Hotel Obispo; R -3-H zone;
Elaine Simer, applicant. (Jaime Hill) (continue to date uncertain)
ARC Minutes
December 18, 2006
Page 4
At the request of the applicant, this item was continued to a date uncertain without
discussion, to allow the applicant to revise the plans to make the project more
affordable.
4. Staff
A. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an overview of upcoming projects for the January 80 ARC hearing.
She mentioned that the meeting on January 221d would be held in the Council Chamber,
rather than the Hearing Room because the CHC would be meeting on the same night.
5. Commission:
A. Minutes of December 4, 2006
The minutes of December 4, 2006 were approved with a few amendments. Commr.
Lopes suggested that the minutes better summarize the ARC members' suggestions,
rather than focus on questions posed.
B. Budget Goals
A minor modification was made to Goal # 1, dealing with providing examples of
affordable -by -design housing. The ARC added language to clarify that written
guidelines along with graphics be incorporated in the Community Design Guidelines to
illustrate examples.
C. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business the meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m. to the regular meeting of
the ARC scheduled for January 8, 2007, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Hearing Room of
City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted by
Jill Francis
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on January 8, 2007.
Diane R. Stuart, CIU
Management Assistant