HomeMy WebLinkAboutARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES 2010ARCHITECTURAL
REVIEW
COMMISSION
MINUTES
2010
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
January 20, 2010
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Chris Weber, Greg Wilhelm,
Vice -Chair Anthony Palazzo, and Chairperson Allen Root
Absent: Commissioner Jim Duffy
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Associate Planner Brian Leveille, Principal
Transportation Planner Peggy Mandeville, Civil Engineer Mike McGuire,
Biologist Freddy Otte and Recording Secretary Janet Miller
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 3600 S. Hiquera Street. ARCPA 94-09; Review of new public art sculpture along
property frontage; C -S zone: Meathead Movers, applicant. (Continued from the
December 7, 200, meeting) (Brian Leveille)
Brian Leveille, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, recommending that the ARC
adopt a resolution, which finds that the proposed art piece meets the City's Guidelines for
Public Art in Private Projects, based on findings, and subject to conditions which he outlined.
Aaron Steed, applicant, explained the piece and the inspiration for the design.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Wilhelm questioned the height and asked about construction of the base. Staff
replied that the art piece would have a height between 8 and 10 feet.
Chairman Root was comfortable with the scale of the piece being enlarged and wanted to
see the street yard landscaping well maintained.
ARC Minutes
January 20, 2010
Page 2
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Hopkins, Weber, Ehdaie, Palazzo, and Root
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commr. Duffy
The motion passed on a 6:0 vote.
2. 1269 Vista Lasso. ARC/ER 74-09; Environmental and architectural review of a new
bicycle and pedestrian path extending from Vista Lago to Oceanaire Drive and a
connecting bridge in Vista Lago Park, including a creek setback exception; C -OS -40
zone; City of San Luis Obispo — Public Works Department, applicant. (Pam Ricci)
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, along with Peggy Mandeville, Mike McGuire, and Freddy Otte
presented the staff report, recommending that the ARC adopt a resolution, which: (A) Grants
final approval to the project design, based on findings, and subject to conditions and
mitigation measures; (B) Approves a creek setback exception, based on findings, and (C)
Adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
The following members of the public submitted written comments but were not present at the
meeting.
Paul & Catherine Johansen, San Luis Obispo, does not support the project.
Jerry O'Neill, San Luis Obispo, does not support the project.
Shirley Howell, San Luis Obispo, does not support the project
Chris Mathis, San Luis Obispo, supported the project.
Sharon Seymour, San Luis Obispo, does not support the project because of its scale and
design.
Jon Fugler, San Luis Obispo, does not support the project and expressed concern for safety
and the timing of the process for the project.
Amir Bursteen; San Luis Obispo, does not support the project and expressed concern that
adequate project information, a construction schedule, and impacts had not been provided to
the neighborhood.
Cynthia Steele, San Luis Obispo, does not support the project and expressed concern for a
lack of information on the project, the urgency for approving it, and safety issues.
Michelle Shoresman, San Luis Obispo, supported the project.
ARC Minutes
January 20, 2010
Page 3
Jennifer Collins, San Luis Obispo, supported the project but was concerned with safety at
night.
Suzanne Heitzman, San Luis Obispo, does not support project and expressed concern for
the scale, design, safety, and approval process of the project.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Wilhelm was supportive of a bridge at the site but suggested that a different design
from the box truss included in plans be selected.
Commr. Hopkins expressed some concerns about the bridge design but, overall, was
supportive of approval of the project.
Commr. Ehdaie asked staff about the design alternatives considered.
Vice -Chair Palazzo requested clarification for the project's grant requirements. Staff
responded that the City would need to request an extension of the 'grant. He expressed
concern for the quality of the project drawings and questioned the proposed colors of fixtures.
Commr. Weber supported the bridge span as presented and felt that it was an appropriate
scale.
Commr. Wilhelm suggested additional wood elements and a covered bridge concept.
Chairman Root indicated that having some entry features at the bridge would help create a
softer appearance.
elements .were suggested as a design consideration but not mandated."
The ARC also noted other issues brought up by the audience outside of their purview such as
a contingency plan for patrols and other safety concerns and a needs assessment. The
Commission did not include any formal recommendation on these topics as a formal part of
their resolution but suggested that the City Council would be the proper review body to hear
their concerns on these types of issues.
AYES: Commrs. Hopkins, Weber, Ehdaie, Palazzo, and Root
NOES: Commr. Wilhelm
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commr. Duffy
ARC Minutes
January 20, 2010
Page 4
�. The motion carried on a 5:1 vote.
U
3. Staff
a. Agenda Forecast: Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. She
provided an agenda forecast for upcoming meetings and announced that the next
regularly -scheduled ARC meeting of Monday, February 1, 2010, would be cancelled.
She also announced that the second ARC meeting in February is scheduled for
Wednesday, February 17, 2010, because of the Presidents' Day holiday.
b. ARC Recruitment: Pam Ricci mentioned that the deadline for applications for the
three vacancies on the ARC was Friday, January 29, 2010. She suggested that
members spread the word to potential candidates.
4. Commission:
a. Minutes of December 7 and December 14, 2009, were approved as submitted.
b. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned
Commr. Hopkins mentioned that the new Mission Community Bank at the comer of
Prado Road and South Higuera Street was completed and that the finished product was
very attractive. Other Commissioners agreed with this assessment.
The Commission discussed the metal panels on the new freestanding structure adjacent
to the historic Railroad Square building and had comments about the finish and details.
Council Member Ashbaugh addressed the Commission mentioning a recent article in
The Tribune which was critical of the design of the new storage building on the south
side of Fire Station No. 1. Pam Ricci explained the review process for the project.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Janet Miller
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on _February 18, 2010
SAN LUIS OBISPO
^ ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
February 17, 2010
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Jim Duffy, Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Vice -Chair Anthony
Palazzo, and Chairperson Allen Root.
Absent: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, and Chris Weber
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore, Associate
Planner Brian Leveille, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON.NON-AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 3897 South Hiquera Street. ARC 170-07: Review of a proposed commercial project on
the historic Long-Bonetti Ranch property near the comer of South Higuera Street and
Tank Farm Road; M -SP zone; Long Street Farm, LLC, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
Phil Dunsmore, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, recommending that the ARC
adopt the Draft Resolution, which grants final approval to the project, based on findings and
subject to conditions which he outlined.
Carol Florence, applicant representative, provided an overview of the changes made in
response to previous ARC direction.
Curtis Cormaine and Eric Ward, applicant representatives, discussed the architectural
modifications and revisions made in the latest version of plans.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Hopkins and Commr. Duffy indicated a preference for a muted green building color
similar to the one shown on colored building elevations to replace the Heathered Moss color
chip on the colors board.
The Commission directed staff to word Condition 2, to include a preference for the Option 1
carport design with the supports for the carport being finished in a color to match the color
labeled "Copper Canyon."
The Commission directed Staff to condition the project style and details of attachments for
awnings to meet design and functionality.
ARC Minutes
February 17, 2010
Page 2
There were no further comments from the Commission.
On motion by Commr. Ehdaie, seconded by Vice -Chair Palazzo, to adopt the Draft
Resolution with a modification to Condition 2 to include Option 1 for the carport design. The
.following conditions were added: 6) Building colors shall be modified as follows: Lazy Sunday
blue shall be replaced with Benjamin Moore (HC -148) blue. Wildflower yellow shall be
replaced with Benjamin Moore (HC -4) yellow. The Heathered Moss color shall be replaced
architectural details of the project and the historic setting.
AYES: Commrs. Ehdaie, Palazzo, Duffy, Hopkins, and Root
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Wilhelm and Weber
The motion passed on a 5:0 vote
2. 1101 Monterey Street. ARC 63-09; Review of a new convenience store with car was at
existing service station; C-R zone; Long Street Farm, LLC, applicant (Phil Dunsmore)
Brian Leveille, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, recommending that the ARC
adopt the Draft Resolution which grants final approval to the project, based on findings and
subject to conditions which he outlined.
George Garcia, applicant representative, explained the proposed project design and
requested final project design approval. Mr. Garcia requested that the first sentence of
Condition 12 end with the words "to City Standards." Mr. Garcia noted, for the record, that
he did not agree with the imposition of Condition 20, which he stated was a costly
requirement.
Staff replied that the language of Condition 12 could be modified as requested and noted that
Condition 20 did not fall under the purview of the Commission, but Mr. Garcia's comment had
been noted for record.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Chair Root requested clarification on whether colors had to meet requirements of the Shell
Corporation. Mr. Garcia noted that the pump colors are under the designation of Shell, but
the proposed convenience store and carwash are under the domain of the applicant's
ownership control for color designation.
ARC Minutes
February 17, 2010
Page 3
_ There were no further comments made from the Commission.
the following modifications:
1. Condition 12: the first sentence changed to eliminate "and shall be approved by
the city" at the end of the sentence.
2. Condition 11: added the words "where required by project construction" to the end
of the first sentence.
3. Condition 3: Item (1) provides options for the ultimate location of the trash and
recycling enclosure. Item (2) the sign over the convenience store entrance may be
internally -illuminated channel letters.
AYES: Commrs. Duffy, Palazzo, Hopkins, Ehdaie, and Root
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Wilhelm and Weber
The motion carried on a 5:0 vote.
3. Staff
a. Agenda Forecast: Pam Ricci presented a forecast of upcoming projects.
4. Commission:
a. Minutes: January 20, 2010, were approved as submitted.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:28 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Janet Miller
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on _March 1, 2010_
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
March 1, 2010
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Jim Duffy, Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Chris Weber,
Greg Wilhelm, Vice -Chair Anthony Palazzo, and Chairperson Allen Root
Absent: None
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci and Recording. Secretary Janet Miller
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 400 Prado Road. ARC/ER 112-07; Environmental and design review of an
approximately 160,000 square -foot development of a business park on a 20 -acre
site; BP zone; Prado Park, LLC, applicant. (Pam Ricci)
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending that the ARC
adopt the Draft Resolution, which grants final approval to the project design, based on
findings, and subject to conditions and mitigation measures which she outlined.
Warren Hamrick, applicant's representative, provided an overview of changes made in
response to previous ARC direction. He noted that the monument sign design depicted
on the landscaping plan is preferred by the applicant over the rock feature shown on the
corner perspective. He mentioned that the applicant did not object to the change to the
"gold color" on Color Scheme 2 as proposed by staff in Condition 3. Mr. Hamrick
requested that a change be made to Condition 5 to include an option of stamped
asphalt rather than stamped concrete for the alternative paving of the entry driveway.
Dave Foote, applicant's representative, discussed the advantages of the proposed use
of tree wells in portions of the parking lot over the City's standard of peninsular planters
in terms of having a greater overall number of trees on the site.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Sterling 'Van De Moortel, San Luis Obispo, expressed concerns over the ability of the
narrow roadway to handle anticipated traffic under Phase 1 construction. He noted that
traffic is already heavy and travels at a relatively high rate of speed (about 50 mph).
ARC Minutes
March 1, 2010
Page 2
Pam Ricci pointed out the street requirements and phasing plans had already been
approved by the City Council with their approval of the tentative tract map and Mitigated
Negative Declaration. She suggested that the specifics of those prior approvals could
be reviewed with staff at the offices of Community Development and Public Works.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Duffy suggested varying the complementary color options for the seven
buildings.
Commr. Wilhelm questioned the requested change to Condition 5 to use stamped
asphalt. Staff referred to the Margarita Area Specific Plan development standards
calling for pervious materials and to create a visual break.
Commr. Duffy was not supportive of the requested change to use stamped asphalt. He
requested that.the color palettes for buildings include additional accent colors and that
staff works with the applicant on the trellis details.
Commr. Wilhelm supported the use of the tree wells as shown on the landscaping plans
and agreed with Commr. Duffy about additional accent colors.
Commr. Weber supported the addition of a condition for details of the canopies and
trellises to be worked out between the staff and applicant along with the submittal of
building plans.
Chair Root preferred the use of an alternative material to the proposed stucco -covered
foam for cornices, agreed with the recommendation for additional accent colors on
buildings, and suggested the use of larger trees in the landscape design.
of the Community Development Director with the review of working drawings for a
building permit."
ARC Minutes
March 1, 2010
Page 3
�. AYES: Commrs. Palazzo, Weber, Duffy, Wilhelm, Hopkins, Ehdaie, and Root
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: None
The motion passed on a 7:0 vote.
2. Staff
a. Agenda Forecast - Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
3. Commission:
a. Minutes of February 17, 2010, were approved as submitted.
b. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned
Commissioners discussed the recent installation of the three sculptures on
Buena Vista near Monterey Street mentioning that the positions of the sculptures
and the finish were somewhat different from what they recalled with the review of
the pieces.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
Janet Miller
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on _March 15, 2010
Supe&isinq Admin
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
March 15, 2010
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Jim Duffy, Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Chris Weber,
Greg Wilhelm, Vice -Chair Anthony Palazzo, and Chairperson Allen Root
Absent: None
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci and Assistant Planner James David
ACCEPTANCE OF THE. AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Downtown. ARC 5-10; Downtown Beautification — Review possible new
standards for trash/recycling receptacles and news rack enclosures; City of San
Luis Obispo, applicant. (Pam Ricci)
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the Commission
provide direction to staff on the preferences for the designs of these two types of street
furniture.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Linda Gruber, Save Our Downtown, supported the design of the new trash receptacle
installed in front of the Wineman Hotel. She expressed concerns with the numbers of
news racks and different styles in the downtown.
Deborah Cash, Downtown Association (DA), appreciated the progress that the City is
making with the Downtown Beautification goal. She mentioned that the DA had a
design committee and that she would like them to be involved in the review of the street
furniture. She liked the new style of trash receptacle a lot but was concerned with the
scale of the base supports and the outward -facing orientation of the news rack. She
also felt that other pieces of equipment installed in the sidewalk conflicted with the news
rack.
ARC Minutes
March 15, 2010
Page 2
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Commission discussed the trash and recycling receptacles and news rack
enclosure installed in the block of Higuera Street in front of the Wineman Hotel. They
provided direction to staff to look at some alternative designs for trash enclosures that
may evoke more of the retro character of some of the other more decorative street
furniture in the downtown like the pedestrian street lights.
They provided the following feedback on the news rack enclosure design:
a. Look at a sleeker and cleaner design more in keeping with the style of the
enclosure depicted in Slide No. 12 in the presentation.
b. Consider an enclosure that is lower in profile.
c. Modify the "feet" of the installed enclosure to be less bulky.
d. Work with a manufacturer that has enclosure styles that come in a variety of
sizes and configurations to provide flexibility for installations in different settings.
The ARC requested that the discussion regarding street furniture be continued to the
meeting of April 5t'. The Commission specifically asked to have a regular meeting to
take care of various business items and then take a field trip to the downtown core to
look at street furniture as a group.
2. 12424 Los Osos Valley Road. ARC -C 129-09; Conceptual architectural review of
demolition and rebuild of gas station with convenience store and new automatic
car wash; C -T zone; BP West Coast, applicant. (James David)
Commr. Duffy recused himself from participating in the discussion of Item 2 because of
a potential conflict of interest and left the meeting.
James David, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report, recommending that the
ARC continue the project to a date uncertain with directional items included in the staff
report to assure consistency with the General Plan, Community Design Guidelines, and
all applicable codes and ordinances.
Alex Cuevas, AGC Design Concepts, responded to questions from the ARC regarding
his reaction to directional items in the staff report. He emphasized that the retention of
the LED lights on the canopy was important to have more visibility at night.
Nader Ghiam, new franchise co-owner, explained that he was remodeling older stations
throughout San Luis Obispo County. In the case of the subject project, he stated that
his goal was to bring the station up to current standards and to add a carwash.
Bruce Sayahn, new franchise co-owner, indicated his support for the project and noted
that it would benefit the community.
ARC Minutes
March 1.5, 2010
Page 3
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Greg Wynn, San Luis Obispo, stated that the project would be a substantial
improvement to the site, but shared some of the concerns brought out by staff in their
presentation, specifically mentioning the following comments:
1) Support for the idea of closing off the driveway along Calle Joaquin near LOVR;
2) Provide more variation on the canopy height;
3) Leave the pump islands perpendicular to the street, rather than angling them;
4) Include design elements in the project that match their function.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Weber wanted to see the building design simplified and mentioned that the
current design looked like five separate buildings, rather than one. He felt that the
parapet height was excessive.
Comm -r. Wilhelm supported a continuous cornice and functional trellises.
submitted for final architectural review:
1. Further refine building elements to be authentic and less corporate in
stone veneer proposed on conceptual plans. Simplify the main buildinds
cornice element.
2 Awning colors shall be more in keeping with building wall colors (not so bright
and 'Primary"). Consider further changes to the style of the awnings to make
them more functional for climate control.
4 Incorporate a roof design and detailing for the canopy which coordinates with
the main building design and breaks up its apparent scale A single canopy
119 feet in length is unacceptable.
5. Investigate additional ways to create a more energy efficient and "green"
project design.
AYES: Commrs. Palazzo, Ehdaie, Weber, Wilhelm, Hopkins, and Root
NOES: None
RECUSED: Commr. Duffy
ABSENT: None
The motion passed on a 6:0:1 vote.
ARC Minutes
March 15, 2010
Page 4
3. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast - Pam Ricci provided an agenda forecast for upcoming
meetings. She mentioned that the appeal of the ARC's approval of the Prefumo
Creek bicycle bridge and path was on the City Council's agenda of March 16th.
She also reminded Commissioners of the upcoming advisory body dinner on
Thursday, March 25th, at the Ludwig Center.
4. Commission:
a. Minutes: March 1, 2010 - The minutes were. approved as submitted.
b. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Pam Ricci
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on _April 5, 2010_
Ryan B�
Sue ing Administrativ )stant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
April 5, 2010
OATH OF OFFICE: City Clerk Elaina Cano swore in new Commissioner Greg Wynn
and re -appointed Commissioners Steve Hopkins and Anthony
Palazzo
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wynn, Jim Duffy, Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins,
Chris Weber, and Vice -Chair Anthony Palazzo
Absent: Greg Wilhelm
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci and Jay Walter, Public Works Director
ELECTION: Election of Chairperson and Vice -Chairperson
Nomination and election of Anthony Palazzo as Chairperson
Nomination and election of Jim Duffy as Vice Chair
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Downtown. ARC 5-10; Downtown Beautification Discussion and Field Trip —
Continued review of possible new standards for trash/recycling receptacles and
news rack enclosures; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Pam Ricci)
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, provided a PowerPoint presentation that served as a recap
of the continued discussion from the March 15th meeting. Jay Walter, Public Works
Director, also participated in the presentation and responded to technical questions from
Commissioners. Based on the images of enclosures for news racks presented, the
Commission preferred the elegance and simplicity of the Chicago example.
The Commission and staff then took a short field trip from City Hall to the downtown to
look at and discuss installed street furniture as a group. The purpose of the field trip
was to look at street furniture in the field to understand the context for the proposed new
standards. Other members of the public present that participated in the discussion were
Deborah Cash, Downtown Association Executive Director; Pierre Rademaker,
Draft ARC Minutes
April 5, 2010
Page 2
Downtown Association Board of Directors; and past ARC members Allen Root and
Zeljka Howard.
The Commission stopped and made observations along their route, but focused their
discussion on the newly -installed street furniture in front of the Wineman Hotel.
News Rack Enclosure
Allen Root suggested that the existing enclosure would benefit in appearance if it were
lowered and had a skirt or valence installed around the bottom. There was general
consensus that the existing unit was mounted too high off the ground.
Jay Walter mentioned the benefits of having some clearance for the enclosure above
the sidewalk to allow for on-going cleaning and maintenance.
Greg Wynn suggested that large new development projects be encouraged to include
built-in enclosures in walls for the distribution of news papers and magazines, rather
than adding more clutter to the sidewalks.
On the way back to City Hall, Steve Hopkins and other Commissioners mentioned that
the shape of the barrel-vaulted bus stop enclosure roof might be a shape to be
emulated in the design of an enclosure.
r
Staff indicated that they would conduct further research regarding the preferred
enclosure style (the Chicago example) and return with options and more information on
a possible enclosure standard at a later date. Jay Walter added that it may turn out to
be more cost effective to have a local person fabricate the enclosures if the City cannot
find a prefabricated unit that coordinates with other street furniture.
Trash & Recycling Receptacle
After discussion, the Commission determined that the new, slatted receptacle created
by the same company as the memorial benches was acceptable as a potential new City
standard with the following:
1) The enclosure should be installed flush with the sidewalk, rather than on a
pedestal.
2) Modify the signage so that it is clearer where the trash and recycling is
intended to be deposited.
3) Use a signage style that looks more integrated with the surface such as laser -
cut or embossed letters and not like a bumper sticker, or at least change the
color of the sticker to match the color of the container with white letters.
4) If possible, reduce the depth of the ledge between the main container surface
and the top -mounted recycling area to minimize places where other refuse
such as gum and cigarettes might be placed.
5) If possible, improve the function of the recycle top to better allow for the trash
to fall into the main container below.
Draft ARC Minutes
April 5, 2010
Page 3
COMMENT & DISCUSSION:
2. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast — Pam Ricci provided an update on the planned agendas for
upcoming meetings.
3. Commission:
a. Minutes: March 15, 2010 - The minutes were approved as submitted.
b. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned
Steve Hopkins mentioned the bright orange fencing installed at the new home of
Daylight Gardens on Monterey Street. He noted that the color, height, proximity to
the street, and extensive length of the fencing made it "visually overwhelming."
Other Commissioners agreed and asked staff to report back on the circumstances
at the next meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Pam Ricci
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on _April 19, 2010_
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
April 19, 2010
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Chris Weber, Greg
Wilhelm, Greg Wynn, and Chairperson Anthony Palazzo
Absent: Vice -Chair Jim Duffy
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Associate Planner Tyler Corey, and Recording
Secretary Janet Miller
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
Susan Ahamady, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of replacing the metered parking
lots with ticketed time lots in the downtown area. Staff directed Ms. Ahamady to contact
the City Parking Manager Robert Horch.
Jason Silver, San Luis Obispo, requested clarification on the renovation timeline
requirements for structures requiring significant rebuild. He was specifically concerned
with the Cabo San Luis restaurant on Foothill which had recently sustained fire damage.
"Mike" Mayank Naik, San Luis Obispo, supported the design and development of
underground buildings in the downtown area.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1.
Marsh Street. ARC 124-06: Review project redesign and Final Environmental
Impact Report prepared for the Garden Street Terraces project; C -D -H zone;
Garden Street SLO Partners, LP, applicant. (Tyler Corey)
Tyler Corey, Associate Planner, provided a detailed PowerPoint presentation
highlighting items covered in the staff report and recommended that the ARC adopt the
Draft Resolution, which affirms the Cultural Heritage Committee's and Planning
Commission's determinations of EIR adequacy.
Carol Florence, applicant representative, supported staffs recommendation and urged
approval by the Commission.
George Garcia, applicant representative, provided a PowerPoint presentation that
summarized the evolution of the project design and spoke in support of the project.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Draft ARC Minutes
April 19, 2010
Page 2
Allan Cooper, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the staff and Planning Commission
recommendation on the EIR and project. He supported maintaining a 15 -foot setback
above the second -floor level along Marsh & Broad Streets, complying with the Secretary
of the Interior Standards for historic rehabilitation and preservation, and having a
coherent pedestrian plan. He did not favor valet parking on Garden Street and
mentioned that with the ARC's discussion of revised plans that colors, materials, and
textures for the elevations will be important.
David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, stated that the pedestrian experience within and around
the project is important. He expressed concerns with the height of the project. He
noted that wind patterns and solar access are factors in evaluating a project design and
requested a physical model be prepared.
Marianne Orme, San Luis Obispo, supported the staff and Planning Commission
recommendation for the reduced development alternative. She recommended that both
sides of Garden Street have equal sidewalk widths and that there be a consistent
treatment to Garden Alley. She did not support valet parking on Garden Street. She
requested that the City support a public relation program during the project construction
to assist existing businesses in the area.
Terry Mohan, San Luis Obispo, expressed disappointment at removal of the public
parking places. He did not support the project's height and massing.
Kathy Collins, San Luis Obispo, did not support valet parking on Garden Street and was
concerned with impacts of the project to bike parking and trash pick-up.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Wynn was concerned with solar shading impacts on Garden Street and wanted
to see a shading analysis when revised plans returned to the ARC. He supported the
diversity of the tenants proposed in the project.
Commr. Ehdaie would like to see the pedestrian experience preserved and enhanced
on the streets and alleys surrounding the project site.
Commr. Weber strongly supported the retention of the wooden structures on Garden
Street and endorsed that they be restored consistent with the Secretary of the Interior
Standards.
Commr. Hopkins noted his support for the direction that the project is taking and
mentioned that the scale and mass of the Marsh Street elevation could be reduced and
its appearance enhanced through the selection of the right colors and materials.
Commr. Wilhelm supported the retention of a market in the project and would like to see
further design development of Garden Alley in future presentations.
Draft ARC Minutes
April 19, 2010
Page 3
Chair Palazzo agreed that valet parking for the project was better suited to Marsh Street
and indicated the importance of seeing actual samples of materials and colors in future
presentations.
determination of EIR adequacy.
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Weber, Wynn, Hopkins, Ehdaie, and Palazzo
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commr. Duffy
The motion passed on a 6:0 vote.
2. Staff
a. Agenda Forecast:
• Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
• Greg Wynn volunteered to serve as the ARC's representative on the Tree
Committee for the next 6 months.
3. Commission:
a. Minutes of April 5, 2010, were approved as amended.
b. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned
Commr. Hopkins commented that the sculptures installed at Monterey and Buena
Vista were a nice addition and looked good installed on the turf.
Commr. Wilhelm mentioned the blank wall facing Marsh Street at the newly -
remodeled service station at the corner of Higuera and Marsh Streets. Staff
mentioned that the Pegasus logo was removed because of its affiliation with a
competing oil company and that they are working with the architect to add some
additional articulation to the wall along with enhanced landscaping.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Janet Miller
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on May 17, 2010.
Rya etz
SuUetvisinq Administrative ssistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
May 3, 2010
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Greg Wynn, Vice -Chair Jim Duffy, and
Chairperson Anthony Palazzo
Absent: Commissioners Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, and Chris Weber
Staff: Director John Mandeville, Deputy Director Doug Davidson, and Recording
Secretary Janet Miller
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: There were no comments made
from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Development Review Activity Update (John Mandeville and Doug Davidson)
John Mandeville, Director, and Doug Davidson, Deputy Director, presented the staff
report, based on findings and subject to conditions which were outlined.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Wynn stated the level of service is exceptional. Commr. Wynn questioned the
numerical data on phone calls provided in presentation.
Commr. Wynn asked how the Commission members could support the Community
Development Department. Mr. Mandeville discussed the positive connection members
have to the public through communication.
There were no further comments made from the Commission.
No vote was required.
2. Staff
a. Agenda Forecast — Doug Davidson gave a forecast of upcoming projects.
ARC Minutes
May 3, 2010
Page 2
3. Commission:
a. Minutes: April 19, 2010 to be approved as amended at next meeting.
b. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned (Daylight Gardens site discussed)
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Janet Miller
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on July 19, 2010.
n
Sui)e&isina Adminis%tydAssistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
May 17, 2010
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Chris Weber, and Greg
Wilhelm, and Chairperson Anthony Palazzo
Absent: Vice -Chair Jim Duffy and Commr. Greg Wynn
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci and Deputy Community Development Director
Kim Murry
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
Keith Pellemeier, Public Works Department, discussed the need for an ARC
representative to serve on the Tree Committee. He noted how the ARC reviews tree
proposals along with their consideration of projects and that this provides a natural
nexus between the two advisory bodies. He added that the Tree Committee meets
once a month on the fourth Monday of the month and that meetings typically run about
2 hours.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. No Specific Address. ARCPA 111-09; Review proposed sculpture to be placed in
the fountain of the landscaped median at. Marsh and Higuera Streets; City of San
Luis Obispo — Parks & Recreation Dept., applicant. (Pam Ricci)
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the Commission
find the proposed sculpture and modifications to the fountain are consistent with the
ARC's criteria for the review of public art projects. She outlined four main discussion
items for the ARC to focus on with discussion of the piece, which were scale, context,
public safety, and reflectivity of the metal finish.
Jeffrey Laudenslager, project artist, described the function and purpose of the piece, and
responded to ARC questions.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Jim Jacobson, San Luis Obispo, supported the proposal and was satisfied with the
artist's responses to the discussion issues pointed out by staff related to the piece. He
added that, potentially, a smaller piece may be a better fit for the scale of the location.
ARC Minutes
May 17, 2010
Page 2
Ken Herman, San Luis Obispo, questioned if the artwork represents San Luis Obispo
and the historic downtown district. He expressed concern with the possible safety
hazards of the piece and the appropriateness of the proposed location for installation.
Dan Carpenter, San Luis Obispo, noted that he was the Chairman of the Cultural
Heritage Committee, but was speaking as a private citizen. He stated that the
contemporary piece is not appropriate in the context of the setting as.a gateway to the
historic downtown district. He described the community efforts to develop the original
fountain as symbolic of the nearby creek. He was not supportive of the proposed public
art and wanted to see a different piece installed at this location more in keeping with the
nearby historic downtown district.
Landy Fike, San Luis Obispo, noted that she was a member of the Downtown
Association's Design Committee. She supported the proposed sculpture and
appreciated the way it moved. She did not feel that a piece here needed to have a
"historic" look or theme.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Criterion 3 (Scale)
Commr. Ehdaie mentioned that a smaller scale piece might be more appropriate at this
�.' location.
Commr. Weber agreed with the scale of the piece as proposed; however, he
recommended exploring the idea of moving the sidewalk or modifying the cap of the
wall around the fountain to address clearance issues outlined in Condition No. 8.
Commr. Hopkins stated that the piece needs the proposed scale because of all the
competing visual clutter at -the location.
Commr. Wilhelm supported the scale of the piece as proposed.
Commr. Palazzo agreed with the scale of the piece as long as safety clearance
requirements are met.
Criterion 4 (Context)
Commr. Ehdaie stated that the piece is forward thinking and reflects San Luis Obispo's
reputation as a trendsetter. She mentioned that the piece would be a nice addition to
the City's public art collection.
Commr. Wilhelm stated that the piece was compatible with its setting. He commented
that there should be a balance between the amount of traditional and contemporary
�.% works of art in a community.
ARC Minutes
May 17, 2010
Page 3
Commr. Palazzo suggested, that the finish of the materials be toned down as much as
possible.
intersection of Marsh and Hiquera Streets and recommending approval to the Citv
Council, based on findings of consistency with the ARC's criteria for the review of public
art, subject to conditions, and noting two code requirements with the following
clearances include, but are not limited to, adiusting the walkway location, adding
landscaping, and modifying the slumpstone wall cap: and New Condition No. 11:
"Include additional landscaping to soften the appearance of the slumpstone wall while
retaining views of the commemorative plaque."
AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Ehdaie, Hopkins, Weber, and Palazzo
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Duffy & Wynn
The motion passed on a 5:0:2 vote.
2. City -Wide. GPI 72-09; Introduction to the Draft Historic Preservation Program
Guidelines; City of San Luis Obispo — Community Development Department,
applicant. (Kim Murry)
Kim Murry, Deputy Director, presented the staff report, noting that the ARC should
receive public testimony and provide input on the updated Historical Preservation
Program Guidelines. She provided a detailed PowerPoint presentation about the
reasons for pursuing both the historic preservation ordinance and guidelines, past
review of both by the CHC, and next steps. She explained that the proposed ordinance
would establish the CHC like other advisory bodies in the Municipal Code and was not
intended to modify the CHC's existing discretion or the review process for projects. Ms.
Murry outlined specific design -related items in the updated guidelines for which ARC
input was being sought.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Bob Vessely, San Luis Obispo, stated that compatibility is the key issue with the review
of changes to historic properties and other sites in historical districts and should be
completed consistent with the Secretary of the Interior Standards. He mentioned the
ARC Minutes
May 17, 2010
Page 4
Railroad Square project and assisted housing proposal at 1118 Palm as good examples
of new additions on historic sites.
Buzz Kalkowski (Cultural Heritage Committee Member), San Luis Obispo, mentioned
that he believed that the Anholm Addition neighborhood was not officially made into a
historical district because of protests by property owners in the area.
Dan Carpenter (Chairman, Cultural Heritage Committee), San Luis Obispo, indicated
that Contributing properties in Historic Districts are not receiving the same attention as
Master List properties, and he would like to see more minor additions go before the
Cultural Heritage Committee in the future. He noted that while historic properties may
be more expensive to maintain, they also retain a higher value.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Weber asked for clarification on how "character -defining features" of different
architectural styles are illustrated. Deputy Director Murry pointed out how the features
were listed under the various architectural style descriptions.
Commr. Ehdaie felt the Anholm District should be considered as its own historical
district.
Chair Palazzo suggested adding language from Section 3.1.3 to reflect that while
changes to historic buildings should not introduce new or conflicting architectural
elements and should be architecturally compatible, that they should also be
distinguishable and not copy the historic structure.
Commr. Wilhelm expressed concern that the requirement in section 3.4.3 to retain 75%
of a historic resource is open to interpretation. He found the term "framework" troubling
because of the possibility of structural issues that would inhibit the ability to preserve the
historical framing. He concluded that this direction to preserve 75% of a resource could
conflict with building safety.
Chair Palazzo recommended that the Historic Styles should include Folk Victorian. He
provided some background information and photos to staff.
Commr. Wilhelm suggested that the Historic Styles reference existing examples on
City's Historic Resources list.
The Commission agreed that pictures included in the document should be aligned with
sections that they support and reference.
Commr. Weber expressed concern that the Classical or Main Street style does not
describe all of the historic building styles found downtown and that a reference to the
C Community Design Guidelines and graphic shown may be helpful.
ARC Minutes
May 17, 2010
Page 5
There was not a formal action by the ARC regarding the draft guidelines other than to
receive the Commission's comments as reflected above in the minutes.
3. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast - Pam Ricci provided an agenda forecast for upcoming
meetings, noting that the next regular meeting scheduled for June 7, 2010
would be cancelled.
4. Commission:
a. Minutes: April 19, 2010, and May 3, 2010 - The minutes of April 19'' were
approved as submitted. The minutes of May 3rdwere continued due to the
lack of a quorum of members present at that meeting.
b. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned — In response to questions from the
Commission, Pam Ricci noted that there had been some public feedback
expressing concern with the color of the fencing at the new location for
Daylight Gardens.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Pam Ricci
Recording Secretary
Approyed by the Architectural Review Commission on June 21, 2010
Ryan BM2
SuperAinq Administrative
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
June 21, 2010
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Chris Weber, Greg Wynn,
Vice -Chair Jim Duffy, and Chairperson Anthony Palazzo
Absent: Commissioner Greg Wilhelm
Staff: Deputy Director Doug Davidson, Conservation & Recycling Manager Ron
Munds, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: There were no comments.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
City -Wide. ARC 55-10; Review updates to the Landscaping Section (Section 6.2)
of the Community Design Guidelines to incorporate the City's new Water Efficient
Landscape Standards; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Doug Davidson)
Ron Munds, Conservation & Recycling Manager, presented the staff report,
recommending to adopt the Draft Resolution, which approves recommended changes
and additions to the Community Design Guidelines, based on findings and subject to
conditions which he outlined.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Ehdaie requested the inclusion of graphics to visually depict the
recommendations. Staff agreed to include graphic depictions.
There were no further comments made from the Commission.
On motion by Commr. Wynn, seconded by Commr. Ehdaie, to adopt the resolution,
which approves recommended changes and additions to the Community Design
Guidelines.
AYES: Commrs. Ehdaie, Hopkins, Weber, Wynn, Duffy, and Palazzo
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commr. Wilhelm
The motion passed on a vote of 6:0.
ARC Minutes
June 21, 2010
Page 2
2. City -Wide. ARC 55-10; Review updates to the Lighting Section (Section 6.1 C) of
the Community Design Guidelines to include standards from the new Night Sky
ordinance; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (James David)
Doug Davidson, Deputy Director, presented the staff report, recommending to adopt the
Draft Resolution, which approves recommended changes and additions to the
Community Design Guidelines, based on findings and subject to conditions which he
outlined.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: There were no comments.
On a motion by Commr. Weber, seconded by Commr. Hopkins, to adopt the resolution
as presented.
AYES: Commrs. Ehdaie, Hopkins, Weber, Wynn, Duffy, and Palazzo
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commr. Wilhelm
The motion passed on a vote of 6:0.
3. Staff
a. Agenda Forecast
4. Commission:
a. Minutes of May 3, 2010, were held until the next meeting to obtain a quorum.
Minutes of May 17, 2010, were approved as presented.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Janet Miller
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on July 19, 2010.
Ryan l"tz U
Sup isinq Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
July 19, 2010
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Chris Weber, Greg
Wilhelm, and Chairperson Anthony Palazzo
Absent: Vice -Chair Jim Duffy and Commr. Greg Wynn
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci and Recording Secretary Janet Miller
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: There were no comments.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Downtown. ARC 5-10: Review of preliminary designs for news rack enclosures;
C -D, City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Pam Ricci)
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending that the ARC
adopt the draft resolution supporting tentative designs for trash/recycling receptacles
and enclosures for news racks in the downtown.
Jay Walter, Director of Public Works, provided an update on the City Council's action
related to Downtown Beautification on June 15, 2010, and explained the tentative
design options.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Pierre Rademaker, San Luis Obispo, supported keeping the profile low and not
cluttering enclosures with signage. He suggested that the bases would appear more
elegant with an ogee -shape base.
Deborah Cash, Downtown Association, mentioned that the decorative the directories
might be an appropriate addition to the backs of some enclosures at selected locations.
Allan Root, San Luis Obispo, supported Alternative E for the enclosure with a matte
finish and a bit of an arch at the top.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Commission discussed the three alternative designs presented and their
preferences and suggestions for modifications. The ARC asked questions of staff
regarding their latitude with making changes to the designs of the alternatives presented
and interacted and considered the suggestions made by members of the public present.
ARC Minutes
July 19, 2010
Page 2
Ultimately a majority of the Commission supported the lower scale alternative labeled
"E". The Commission recommended that the backs of news racks should not be used
for advertising. There was discussion to explore additional detailing in paint color or a
fluted form for the support posts of enclosures, but this was ultimately not
recommended by the Commission.
Chair Palazzo noted that the foot base should be proportional and fluid.
Commr. Wilhelm noted the duplicate nature of signage on the racks.
Commr. Wilhelm initially supported Enclosure C with "Newspaper" signage on top,
elimination of the space between the main part of the enclosure structure and
"Newspaper," and a decorative shroud to cover the plates and bolts connecting the
enclosures to the sidewalk. He also mentioned that the back sides of enclosures could
be considered as displays for public art.
Commr. Wynn, in an email to staff, supported Enclosure E with some suggested
modifications.
Commr. Weber supported picking up the subtle character of the lamppost base in the
design of the news rack footing.
Commr. Hopkins and Ehdaie supported Enclosure E with modifications.
Mr. Rademaker, San Luis Obispo, provided a sketch of the post option with horizontal
collars, which the ARC ultimately incorporated into their motion to support Enclosure E.
On motion by Commr. Weber, seconded by Commr. Ehdaie to adopt the draftresolution
horizontal collars to the support posts and generally prohibit any advertising or signage
on the back sides of enclosures.
AYES: Commrs. Ehdaie, Hopkins, Weber, Wilhelm, and Palazzo
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Wynn and Duffy
The motion passed on a 5:0 vote.
COMMENT & DISCUSSION
2. Staff
ARC Minutes
July 19, 2010
Page 3
a. Agenda Forecast: Pam Ricci gave an overview of upcoming projects. She
noted that the August 2"d meeting would be cancelled.
3. Commission:
a. Minutes of May 3, 2010, and June 21, 2010, were approved as submitted.
b. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned
The Commission briefly discussed the bright orange fencing installed at the new
home of Daylight Gardens on Monterey Street noting that, since furniture displays
and plants had been installed, the color was somewhat less obtrusive. There was
a new concern that Adirondack -style chairs had been placed on the roof.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Janet Miller
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on September 13, 2010.
Ryan Utz
Supo(ry(sinq Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
August 16, 2010
ROLL CALL:.
Present: Commrs. Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Greg Wynn, and Vice -Chair Jim
Duffy
Absent: Commrs. Greg Wilhelm & Chris Weber and Chairperson Anthony Palazzo
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci and Public Art Coordinator Shannon Bates
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There was no public comment other than on regular agenda items.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 328 Marsh Street. ARC/MOD 230-04; Review revised mural design associated
with a recently -completed service station remodel; C-R zone; Mission Station, Inc.,
applicant. (Phil Dunsmore)
PUBLIC COMMENTS: None
On motion by Commr. Wynn, seconded by Commr. Ehdaie, to continue the proiect to a
date certain — September 13, 2010.
AYES: Commrs. Wynn, Ehdaie, Hopkins, and Duffy
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Wilhelm, Weber, and Palazzo
The motion passed on a 4:0 vote.
2. Downtown. ARCPA 71-10; Review of a public art program to paint murals on
utility boxes; City of San Luis Obispo — Parks & Recreation Department, applicant.
(Pam Ricci)
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, introduced the item and summarized staffs
recommendation.
Shannon Bates, Public Art Coordinator, explained how the program evolved with
several different groups in the community having a similar idea about undertaking a
utility box beautification program.
ARC Minutes
August 16, 2010
Page 2
Commr. Hopkins asked about whether a protective finish would be used on the utility
boxes to protect the art work, and also questioned the maintenance considerations for
this type of public art.
Shannon Bates responded that the intent is to use "frog juice," a coating used
elsewhere to preserve paint and resist against graffiti.
Commr. Duffy asked whether there was any established theme for the painting of the
utility boxes.
Shannon Bates replied back that there is no specific theme, although artists may have
specific ideas for art based on the locations of the boxes.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Deborah Cash, Downtown Association, mentioned a field trip the Downtown Association
had made to Ventura to review their utility box painting program. She noted that
program dates for downtown San Luis Obispo had been established to have the boxes
painted before an upcoming Sunset Magazine event. She mentioned that this type of
public art is a disincentive for graffiti, which is a goal for public art in the downtown.
Landy Fike, San Luis Obispo, member of the Downtown Association's Design
Committee, stated that a sense of discovery with art pieces is important.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Hopkins suggested that the least congested locations may be better suited
than others for the painted utility boxes. He noted the importance of taking into account
the setting of a box in selecting appropriate art.
Commr. Duffy expressed that the quality and level of art in the proposals was
paramount.
Commr. Wynn stated that he preferred painting utility boxes a standard color so that
they are less noticeable. He expressed concerns with the visual noise and clutter from
the decorative painting of boxes. He mentioned that this type of program might be
better on a revolving basis. Although he was not supportive of the program, he did not
endorse the idea of limiting the number of boxes painted through an ARC condition.
Commr. Ehdaie suggested a common theme with more standardization for the utility
boxes might be considered, with the possibility of fewer locations depending on the
volume of proposals received.
V
Area, entitled BoxArt meets the City's Guidelines for Public Artbased on findings and
subject to conditions, and recommend City Council approval of the program with the
fnllnuiinn ..dd..A ........a....,.. a- aV_ c:--• - .._ _...
a
ARC Minutes
August 16, 2010
Page 3
AYES: Commrs. Ehdaie, Hopkins, and Duffy.
NOES: Commr. Wynn
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Wilhelm, Weber, and Palazzo
The motion passed on a 3:1 vote.
COMMENT & DISCUSSION:
3. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast — Pam Ricci provided an update on the planned agendas for
upcoming meetings.
b. Palm-Nipomo Parking Structure Ad Hoc Committee Appointment — The
selection of ARC representatives to the committee was continued to September
13th to allow for absent Commissioners to be involved in the discussion.
c. ARC's Representative on Tree Committee — Commr. Ehdaie indicated that she
was willing to continue to serve as the ARC's representative on the Tree
Committee. She spoke to the Commission about concerns with large trees
being placed in areas that are too close to buildings and sidewalks.
4. Commission:
a. Minutes: July 19, 2010 — The minutes were continued due to the lack of a
quorum of members present at that meeting.
b. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned
Commr. Hopkins noted how good the remodel of the small commercial building
located at the corner of Johnson & Monterey looked. The rest of the Commission
agreed and mentioned the colors, horizontal wood, siding, and grass roof as
interesting details.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Pam Ricci
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on September 13, 2010.
betz
e ng Administrative Assistant
r SAN LUIS OBISPO
�J ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
September 13, 2010
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commrs. Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Greg Wynn, 2 Vacant Positions,
Vice -Chair Jim Duffy, and Chairperson Anthony Palazzo
Absent: None
Staff: Pam Ricci, Senior Planner
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
Former Commissioner Chris Weber (Avila Beach) expressed his appreciation for having
been able to serve on the ARC.
- PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 328 Marsh Street. ARC/MOD 230-04; Review revised mural design associated
with a recently -completed service station remodel; C-R zone; Mission Station, Inc.,
applicant. (Continued from August 16, 2010, meeting) (Phil Dunsmore)
PUBLIC COMMENTS: None
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
On motion by Commr. Wynn, seconded by Commr. Hopkins, to continue the project to a
date uncertain without discussion.
AYES:
Commrs. Ehdaie, Hopkins, Wynn, Duffy, and Palazzo
NOES:
None
RECUSED:
None
ABSENT:
None
The motion passed on a 5:0 vote.
2. 2238 Broad Street. ARC 61-10; Review of modifications to the main commercial
portion of the approved Village at Broad Street mixed-use project (ARC 70-08);
C -N -H -MU zone; Halferty Development Company LLC, applicant. (Pam Ricci)
ARC Minutes
September 13, 2010
Page 2
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending that the ARC
adopt the draft resolution, which grants final approval to the modified project design,
based on findings, and subject to conditions and mitigation measures. She provided a
detailed presentation regarding the City's review of the past project, a comparison of the
two projects, and overview of the main issues discussed in the staff report.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Jim Halferty, applicant, discussed the project history and the changes necessary to
accommodate a viable project given the downturn in the present economy. He stressed
the confirmed desire of Fresh & Easy to be located in San Luis Obispo and noted the
concessions they were willing to make to realize this goal such as having a smaller than
typical sized market. He emphasized that having corporate branding such as the "sail"
is very important. He stated that the store entry cannot be angled; however, they were
willing to modify the west elevation of the building to address concerns that it was not
well articulated. He concluded by introducing his team of design professionals.
COMMISSION QUESTIONS:
Commr. Wynn asked project landscape architect Michael Cripe whether there could be
another pedestrian access provided between the City sidewalk along Broad Street and
the walkway along the south side of Building A. Mr. Cripe responded that the grade
differential would require a zigzag pattern in the street yard with retaining walls. He
noted that there is an existing sidewalk that would be retained on the south side of the
driveway near the north side of the Rabobank property.
Commr. Wynn asked Michael Cripe about there being sufficient room in the parking lot
planters in the main parking fields near Building B, the proposed Fresh & Easy. Mr.
Cripe responded that the trees would be installed to be offset from the car overhangs
consistent with the striping of the parking spaces.
Commr. Wynn asked Michael Cripe about the reason for the roundabout in the center of
parking fields. Mr. Cripe mentioned that the roundabout had been a component of the
earlier site plan in a different location and that its circular design referenced the railroad
roundabout that used to exist near the site.
COMMISSION COMMENTS
Site Planning
Commr. Wynn expressed concern with the functionality of the roundabout but supported
the expanded hardscape areas referring to them as "nodes" for outdoor use. He
suggested a larger patio near the entry to Fresh & Easy, and recommended adding
some kind of pedestrian linkage to the City sidewalk on the south side of Building A. He
ARC Minutes
September 13, 2010
Page 3
mentioned that preserving the village component warranted the possible loss of some
parking spaces.
Commr. Duffy was disappointed with the site planning changes as they do not preserve
the overall village feel and make the project appear more auto -oriented. He
recommended changes to the site plan to bring more of the Main Street feeling back to
the project. He agreed with Commr. Wynn's concerns regarding the roundabout.
Commr. Hopkins agreed with the prior comments.
Commr. Palazzo supported the possible loss of a parking spot or two to allow for the
creation of larger outdoor use areas.
Buildings A and C
Commr. Wynn recommended more wall offsets, as right now the walls appear too flat.
He suggested raising the height of storefronts where entries were not planned so as to
not break the continuity of the bulkhead.
Vice -Chair Duffy suggested more unique architecture that appears less cluttered. He
found the color palette acceptable.
Chariperson Palazzo wanted to see more wall offsets and was concerned with the
appearance of the tower.
Commr. Hopkins feels that the architecture looked too much like it could be developed
anywhere and felt that it needed to be designed for the context of this site.
Building B (Fresh & Easy)
Vice -Chair Duffy stated the wedge roof form and corporate architecture was misplaced
at this location.
Commr. Wynn indicated that the wedge roof form could be acceptable if it is
appropriately detailed and of quality construction.
Commr. Hopkins agreed with Vice -Chair Duffy regarding the wedge roof form, noting
that it might be acceptable on the outskirts of the City, but not in the Railroad Historical
District.
Commr. Ehdaie noted that she could support the wedge roof form but had concerns
with the lack of articulation on the north elevation.
Chairperson Palazzo agreed with Commr. Wynn that the wedge roof needed further
�, refinements.
ARC Minutes
September 13, 2010
Page 4
On motion by Vice -Chair Duffy, seconded by Commr. Ehdaie, to continue action on the
project to a date uncertain with the following direction:
1. The site plan shall be modified to include additional outdoor use areas and
public spaces in the project.
2. Revised elevations for Buildings A, B, & C need to be more consistent with the
Railroad District Plan and the Community Design Guidelines. Buildings should
include more transparent ground floors and provide more substantial offsets in
wall planes. Additional building details need to be clarified in plans related to
finishes, materials, storefronts, windows, cornices, and other features.
3. For Building B, the design, configuration, and materials of the sail and entry
canopy need to be more consistent with the Railroad District Plan.
4. The color of the north elevation of Building B shall coordinate with the other
three sides of the building.
5. Further articulate the west elevation of Building B to be more consistent with
the south and east sides from corner to corner.
- AYES:
Commrs. Ehdaie, Hopkins, Wynn, Duffy, and Palazzo
NOES:
None
RECUSED:
None
ABSENT:
None
The motion passed on a 5:0 vote.
COMMENT & DISCUSSION:
3. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast — Pam Ricci noted that the next regularly -scheduled meeting
for September 20, 2010, would be cancelled. She provided a forecast of
upcoming projects for October.
b. Palm-Nipomo Parking Structure Ad Hoc Committee Appointment Vice -Chair
Duffy & Commr. Wynn were selected to serve on the committee.
4. Commission:
a. Minutes: July 19 and August 16, 2010 - The minutes of July 19th were
approved with one small amendment and the minutes of August 16th were
accepted as prepared.
b. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned
ARC Minutes
September 13, 2010
Page 5
Commr. Wynn mentioned the recently -installed barricade around the outdoor
seating for Muzio's on Higuera Street noting that it was a barrier to circulation
on the sidewalk. He suggested that ropes or another type of barricade that
could be brought in every night might be preferred so the sidewalk was more
open after business hours.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Pam Ricci
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on October 4th, 2010.
Ryan
ifZ �)
Supe ing Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
October 4, 2010
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Suzan Ehdaie, Greg Wynn, Vice -Chair Jim Duffy, and
Chairperson Anthony Palazzo
Absent: Commissioner Steven Hopkins and two vacant positions
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Associate Planner Brian Leveille, and
Recording Secretary Janet Miller
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: There were no comments.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 11966 Los Osos Valley Road. ARC 82-10; Review of new restaurant and site
improvements within the Prefumo Creek Commons shopping center; C-R zone;
Olive Garden, applicant. (Brian Leveille)
Brian Leveille, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, recommending to continue
the item to a date uncertain with direction to modify plans consistent with the City's
Community Design Guidelines and previous approvals for the Prefumo Creek
Commons Project, based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined.
Commr. Wynn questioned if there was a "take-out" option for the site. Staff deferred the
answer to the applicant.
Commr. Ehdaie questioned if there had been previous plans provided to the City. Staff
replied that this was the first submittal for review by the ARC.
John Keen, applicant representative, discussed the authentic Tuscan design in the
building's branding. He stated there will be a take out option for the site. He further
stated that the design has been modified to fit the surrounding area while supporting the
corporate image and branding. He indicated that the proposed circular driveway was
designed to accommodate the handicapped and elderly.
Commr. Duffy questioned if there would be an outside dining area. Mr. Keen replied
there would not.
Luis Comejo, applicant representative, discussed the operational aspects of access to
the building. Mr. Comejo stated that, although the building entrance is currently
oriented to Los Osos Valley Road, he does not expect much pedestrian traffic from the
road.
ARC Minutes
October 4, 2010
Page 2
PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commrs. Ehdaie, Duffy, and Wynn supported the staff report and design guidelines
concerning the drive aisle and building orientation.
Commr. Wynn noted that the 80 parking spots proposed at the rear of the site did attract
pedestrian traffic. He supported the development of informal social outdoor areas for
public gathering and a greater variety of horizontal and vertical articulation in building
architecture.
Commrs. Duffy and Ehdaie supported Commr Wynn's suggestion for a greater variety
of horizontal and vertical articulation in the building's architecture.
Commr. Wynn supported a more authentic use of materials rather than adorning a box
building with stone to have the structure appear aged. He noted that he understands
corporate branding issues, but would like the design to be the very best presentation of
a corporate design.
Vice -Chair Duffy noted the challenge of designing a building with corporate architecture
that meets the City's design guidelines.
Commr. Ehdaie supported staffs recommendation to relocate the trash enclosures.
She supported distinctive Tuscan design features as modifications to the proposed
plans.
Chair Palazzo supported changes to the corporate Tuscan design theme which would
make the building more distinctive. He suggested more honesty in the roof lines and
two-piece roof tiles.
Commr. Wynn noted the trash enclosure size and location could be minimized to meet
functional requirements in future design presentations. He requested the applicant
review the Night Sky Ordinance's criteria in developing the lighting design for the
project.
There were no further comments made from the Commission.
On motion by Commr. Wynn, seconded by Commr. Ehdaie, to continue the item to a
date uncertain with direction to modify plans consistent with the City's Community
Design Guidelines and previous approvals for the Prefumo Creek Commons Proiect
and with amendments to include two-piece roof tiles and the lighting details be
consistent with the City's Night Sky Ordinance.
AYES: Commrs. Ehdaie, Wynn, Duffy, and Palazzo
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commr. Hopkins and two vacant positions
ARC Minutes
October 4, 2010
Page 3
The motion passed on a 4:0 vote.
2. Staff
a. Agenda Forecast
b. Update on ARC Recruitment
c. Budget Goals — Preliminary discussion of the ARC's goals for the 2011-2013
financial plan.
• Continued efforts of downtown beautification and maintenance. Revitalizing
and setting the city apart from other cities.
• Delete references to urban design and items Committee has accomplished.
• Item 3 should be made item 1. Our community should be a leader in
alternative transportation.
• Item D & B should be moved higher on list as critical to the city development.
• Inclusion of strengthening guidelines for clearly defining the blacking out of
windows, interior signs, and storefront window signage addressing both
commercial and downtown businesses.
• Prioritization at a later date.
• Item 5 should be removed as being handled by the Cultural Heritage
Committee.
3. Commission:
a. Minutes of September 13, 2010, were approved as amended.
b. Recent Project Review— Lessons Learned: Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast
of upcoming projects.
The Commission discussed the Box Art project in the downtown. While there were
diverse reactions to specific boxes, in general, the Commission felt that the
program was a success. Commr. Wynn mentioned that most members of the
public that he had spoken to thought of the program favorably.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Janet Miller
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on October 18, 2010.
ng Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
October 18, 2010
OATH OF OFFICE: Swearing in new Commissioner Michelle McCovey-Good
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Steven Hopkins, Michelle McCovey-Good, Greg Wynn,
Vice -Chair Jim Duffy, and Chairperson Anthony Palazzo
Absent: Commissioners Suzan Ehdaie, and 1 Vacant Position
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci and Recording Secretary Janet Miller
ACCEPTANCE. OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: There were no comments.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 2238 Broad Street. ARC 61-10; Review of modifications to the main commercial
portion of the approved Village at Broad Street mixed-use project (ARC 70-08); C-
N -H -MU zone; Halferty Development Co., LLC, applicant. (Pam Ricci)
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending that the
Commission adopt the Draft Resolution, which grants final approval to the modified
project site design and design of Building B, based on findings, and subject to
conditions and mitigation measures which she outlined.
Carol Florence, applicant representative, spoke in support of the project. She
highlighted changes made to the design since the September 13th hearing to address
ARC directional items and requested Commission direction on signage.
Jorge F. Prieto, architect with Adolph Ziemba for Fresh & Easy, spoke in support of the
project.
Commr. Hopkins questioned the functionality of awnings over east -facing windows. Mr.
Prieto replied that awnings would not impede natural lighting.
Vice -Chair Duffy asked if there would be any roof -mounted equipment. Mr. Prieto
replied that all mechanical equipment would be internal to the building. Vice -Chair Duffy
requested further information on the treatment of the building elevation facing Broad
Street. Mr. Prieto indicated that some varied treatments were possible here. Ms.
Florence mentioned that an intensive landscaping treatment would screen views of the
building.
ARC Minutes
October 18, 2010
Page 2
Commr. Wynn requested clarification on bollard control for the plaza area between
Buildings A & C. Mr. Halferty noted there would be a development manager on-site to
oversee bollard control for the site.
Commr. Hopkins questioned the curvilinear treatment of the cornices. Mr. Prieto replied
that the cornices were not a stock design and were tailored specifically for this site.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Wynn mentioned the option to view the vertical parapet as a roof as opposed to
a wood panel. He advocated for a larger hardscape area in front of the main entry to
Fresh & Easy and recommended that the service door on the west elevation not be
painted green but another color that blended better with the adjacent wall color.
Commr. Hopkins would like to see a variation in the materials and details of building
walls, especially the Broad -facing elevation and suggested a simpler cornice design.
Chair Palazzo noted the improvements to the design since the project was last
reviewed. He supported the addition of a condition for revisions to the west elevation to
use more variation in the architectural treatments, textures, and materials.
Commr. Wynn also supported more variation in the treatment and materials for the
recessed areas of the elevations.
On a motion by Commr. Wynn, seconded by Vice -Chair Duffy, to adopt a resolution
granting final approval to the modified project site design and design of Building B
based on findings and subject to conditions and mitigation measures. The ARC
supported staffs suggested revisions to Conditions 4, 11, & 18 and elimination of
Condition 33. The following three conditions were added: 1) The applicant shall utilize
a variety of architectural treatments such as awnings, material and texture changes, and
planters at recessed bays on the west, south, and east elevations with emphasis on the
Broad Street -facing elevation; 2) The service door on the west elevation of Building B
shall be painted to de-emphasize its presence; and 3) The applicant shall create an
expanded hardscape area directly in front of the entry doors to Building B.
AYES:
Commrs. Hopkins, McCovey-Good, Wynn, Duffy, and Palazzo
NOES:
None
RECUSED:
None
ABSENT:
Commrs Ehdaie and one vacant position
The motion passed on a 5:0 vote.
The applicant requested direction on signage.
ARC Minutes
October 18, 2010
Page 3
Staff recommended against an in-depth Commission discussion due to the lack of
analysis on signage at this meeting.
The Commission deferred the discussion on signage to the November 15, 2010,
meeting.
The Commission took a five-minute break at 6:30 p.m.
2. 313 South Street. ARC 35-10; Conceptual review of a new 68 -unit housing
development; M zone; ROEM Development Corp., applicant. (Pam Ricci)
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending that the
Commission continue the item to a date uncertain with direction on site and building
design issues.
Jonathan Emami, applicant representative, provided background on the ROEM
Corporation and project design and spoke in support of the item.
Keith Labus, applicant representative, explained the project plans in more detail and
spoke in support of the item.
Vice -Chair Duffy asked the applicant representative to define the architectural style
used in the design. Mr. Labus replied that there is not a specific architectural style, but
it is a contemporary design with attention to details. ,
Commr. McCovey-Good requested information on the roofing materials. Mr. Labus
stated that it was a flat concrete tile material.
Commr. Hopkins asked about the applicant's reaction to some of the directional items
that were suggested to further reduce the apparent scale of the building, such as using
alternative materials like brick in addition to stucco. Mr. Enami replied that they were
open to using varied materials and explained the stepping techniques and variation in
wall planes inherent in their current design to further reduce the building's scale.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Marilyn Forselles, San Luis Obispo, spoke against the project. She expressed concern
that the project was a rental apartment project, rather than a condominium with
individual ownership and association oversight. She questioned who would make the
re -zoning decision for the project. Staff replied that the rezoning would be considered
first by the Planning Commission and then proceed to the Council for a final decision.
There were no further comments from the public.
ARC Minutes
October 18, 2010
Page 4
r�. COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Hopkins supported the way the building was stepped back from the street and
the residential property to the east and thought that the applicant had done a good job
of articulating the building.
Vice -Chair Duffy preferred the original design with parapets and flat roofs and supported
the variation of materials to break down the scale.
Commr. Wynn stated that pitched roofs might be appropriate if they were used on lower
portions of the building where they might be more visible from different vantages. He
thought the current design was too monotonous and could benefit from more variety in
window sizes.
Commr. McCovey-Good supported more variety in the use of materials on the building
including a varied base treatment to help minimize the building's scale.
Chair Palazzo supported a more defined architectural style with a nod to the Craftsman
style.
Commr. Hopkins noted that the surrounding neighborhood lacked a specific
architectural style.
Chair Palazzo suggested that the roof details and style be appropriate and consistent
with the overall architectural style of the building.
Vice -Chair Duffy noted that the applicant could borrow proportion and form from the
neighboring area.
On a motion by Vice -Chair Duffy, seconded by Commr. Hopkins to continue the item to
a date uncertain with directional items included in the staff report and the following
additional items: 1) The roof desictn and details shall be consistent with the building
style selected: 2) Provide a more substantial and prominent entry to the building:
3) Provide more variety in the size and configuration of windows: 4) Look at the use of
colors and/or materials to help highlight building features and reduce the apparent
scale: and 5) Cluster street tree planting to help highlight the entry.
AYES: Commrs. Hopkins, McCovey-Good, Wynn, Duffy, and Palazzo
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Ehdaie and one vacant position
The motion carried on a 5:0 vote.
ARC Minutes
October 18, 2010
Page 5
3. Staff
a. Agenda Forecast: Pam Ricci provided an update of upcoming projects.
b. Budget Goals — Commission members were in support of the revised budget
goals presented by staff based on ARC direction from the October 4t' meeting.
c. ARC representative for Way -finding Signage Committee — Anthony Palazzo
volunteered to serve on the committee.
d. Vice -Chair Duffy indicated that his schedule would not permit him to make many
of the meetings of the Palm-Nipomo Parking Structure Ad Hoc Committee.
Commr. McCovey-Good volunteered to take over his spot. Commr. Wynn
would continue as the other ARC representative on the committee.
4. Commission:
a. Minutes of October 4, 2010, were approved as submitted.
b. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned
Commr. Wynn expressed concern with the height of, and glare from, the pole lights
on top of the older parking structure on Palm Street.
Commr. Hopkins noted some recent upgrades to businesses in the downtown that
were attractive including the repainting of the Art Center, the remodel of the space
on Monterey Street for Eco -Bambino, and the exterior remodel of Beverly's.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Janet Miller
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on November 15, 2010.
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
November 15, 2010
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Ken Curtis, Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Michelle
McCovey-Good, and Chairperson Anthony Palazzo
Absent: Commissioner Greg Wynn and Vice -Chair Jim Duffy
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES: The minutes of October 18, 2010, were approved as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 950 California Boulevard. ARC -S 106-10; Request for an exception to the Sign
Regulations to allow a wall sign on a fence; C -T zone; Franks Famous Hot Dogs,
applicant. (James David)
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending adoption of the
draft resolution approving an exception to the Sign Regulations, based on findings..
Mark Blackford, Signcraft, project representative, agreed with staff's recommendation
and indicated he was available to answer any questions.
Jimmy Graton, Franks Famous Hot Dogs manager, further noted that he was in
agreement with the recommendation to approve the patio wall sign.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no further comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Curtis noted his support of the sign, but suggested alternative findings be made
in support of the exception request.
On motion by Commr. Hopkins, seconded by Commr. Ehdaie to adopt the draft
resolution approving the exception to allow the sign based on findings as
recommended by staff.
ARC Minutes
November 15, 2010
Page 2
AYES:
Commrs. Curtis, Ehdaie, Hopkins, McCovey-Good, and Palazzo
NOES:
None
RECUSED:
None
ABSENT:
Wynn and Duffy
The motion passed on a 5:0 vote.
2. 2238 Broad Street. ARC 61-10; Review of sign program and modifications to the
main commercial portion of the approved Village at Broad Street mixed-use project
(ARC 70-08); C -N -H -MU zone; Halferty Development Co., LLC, applicant. (Pam
Ricci)
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending adoption of the
Draft Resolution, which grants final approval to the sign program and architectural
designs for Buildings A & C, based on findings, and subject to conditions and mitigation
measures:
Jim Halferty, property owner and applicant, introduced the team and mentioned some
remaining issues that he had with recommended conditions.
Lalaine Tanaka, KTGY Architects, described proposed materials to be used in project.
- She noted that the storefront colors will vary between spaces and that the use of some
wood siding was acceptable to the applicant. She added that lower comices will consist
of fiberglass -reinforced concrete and taller cornices will have foam cores. She
mentioned that some metal factory -painted canopies will be utilized.
Michael Cdpe, Oasis Associates, noted that the revised building designs reflected true
windows and entries. He added that the signs proportionally fit the building faces they
would be placed on and provided contrast to the building materials. As an example,, he
pointed out that the green background of the main Fresh & Easy sign provides contrast
to the wood siding of the sail that it would be placed on.
Jim Halferty stated that the proposed sign program provides visibility for tenants.
Jorge Prieto, Adolph Ziemba, AIA & Associates, noted the Broad Street sign for the
Fresh & Easy store will have halo lighting.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Mark Blackford, Sign Craft, commented that the building designs in the project were
beautiful.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Ehdaie would like to see more articulation on the east elevation of Building C.
Commr. Curtis noted the sign areas are proportional to the building walls.
ARC Minutes
November 15, 2010
Page 3
On a motion by Commr. Hopkins, seconded by Commr. Ehdaie, to adopt the draft
resolution as recommended by staff. The Commission modified recommended
conditions in the draft resolution as follows:
a. Clarified Condition #4 to note that bulkheads would be pre -cast concrete:
b. Eliminated Condition 11a requiring that the monument sign be relocated to a
more centralized location:
c. Condition 11f was corrected to reference the east elevation:
The following conditions were added`
d. Horizontal shiplap siding shall be incorporated on select storefronts to add
visual interest and complement materials approved for Building B (Fresh &
Easy) consistent with the Railroad District Plan.
e. If proposed murals are not pursued on the north and east elevations of Building
C. then some other form of building articulation shall be added to the approval
of the Community Development Director or ARC as deemed appropriate
AYES:
Commrs. Curtis, Ehdaie, Hopkins, McCovey-Good, and Palazzo
NOES:
None
RECUSED:
None
ABSENT:
Commrs. Wynn and Duffy
The motion passed on a 5:0 vote.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
3. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast — Pam Ricci provided a forecast for upcoming agendas.
4. Commission:
a. Chairperson Palazzo provided a status report on the City's way -finding
program. He mentioned the importance of the ARC's role in helping identify
gateways.
b. Commr. Hopkins pointed out how the seismic upgrade program continues to
beautify the downtown. He mentioned the recently -unveiled Maytag building on
Higuera Street and the spaces adjacent to Big Sky on Broad Street as good
examples.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Pamela Ricci,
Recording Secretary
ARC Minutes
November 15, 2010
Page 4
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on December 6, 2010.
O SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
December 6, 2010
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Ken Curtis, Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Michelle
McCovey-Good, Greg Wynn, Vice -Chair Jim Duffy, and Chairperson
Anthony Palazzo
Absent: Vice -Chair Jim Duffy, at roll call, arrived at 5:06 p.m.
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Assistant Planner James David, and Recording
Secretary Janet Miller
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES: Minutes of November 15, 2010, were accepted as presented.
PRESENTATION: Cal Poly Landscape Architecture Class — City Gateways
(Vangeli Evangelopoulos, Ph. D)
- Professor Evangelopoulos explained the parameters for the gateway analysis.
Individual students then presented their design concepts for the seven designated
gateway locations.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: There were no comments.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 2959 Broad Street. ARC 96-10; Review of proposed car wash, new commercial
building, and remodel to existing commercial warehouse at Broad and Sweeney; C-
SS zone; Westpac Investments, applicant. (James David)
James David, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report, recommending that the
ARC adopt a draft resolution which grants final approval to the project's design, based
on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined.
George Garcia, applicant representative, discussed different components of the mixed-
use project including three commercial uses and one residential use.
Howard Hintz, applicant representative, provided information on the Accutech Central
Vacuum System proposed for the project.
ARC Minutes
December 6, 2010
Page 2
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Erik Rheinisch, San Luis Obispo, questioned if the western property line's fence would
be replaced. Mr. Garcia noted that, at present, it would not be replaced.
There were no further comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Duffy supported the staff recommendation including conditions for more muted
colors for vacuum canopy awnings and lowering the height of the carwash sign. He
also supported keeping the furred -out extension at the front of the building to provide for
a more articulated roof.
Commr. Curtis supported the muted colors of the awnings, and the articulated roof. He
felt the fence bordering residential to the north should have sound attenuation. He also
supported using a non -reflective material on the vacuum canopies.
Commr. Wynn supported the project. He requested that a project sign program return
to the Commission for review. He supported the proposed color palette and the
articulated roof design.
There were no further comments made from the Commission.
On motion by Commr. Duffy, seconded by Commr. Curtis, to support the staff
recommendation to adopt the draft resolution with the following changes:
through the use of non -reflective materials or color change, subject to the
approval of the Community Development Director.
3) Modify condition #9 by upgrading to a solid 6 -foot -high fence providing sound
building permit submittal, subject to approval of the Community Development
Director.
AYES: Commrs. Curtis, Ehdaie, Hopkins, McCovey-Good, Wynn, Duffy, and
Palazzo.
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: None
The motion passed on a 7:0 vote.
ARC Minutes
December 6, 2010
Page 3
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
2. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast - Pam Ricci provided an agenda forecast for upcoming
meetings.
b. Review of 2011-2013 Architectural Review Commission Budget Goals —
Committee supported as presented
3. Commission:
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Janet Miller
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on December 20, 2010.
Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
December 20, 2010
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Ken Curtis, Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Michelle
McCovey-Good, Greg Wynn, Vice -Chair Jim Duffy, and Chairperson
Anthony Palazzo
Absent: None
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci and Recording Secretary Janet Miller
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES: The minutes of December 6, 2010, were approved as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: There were no comments.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
313 South Street. ARC 35-10; Conceptual review of a new 43 -unit housing
development; M zone; ROEM Development Corp., applicant. (Pam Ricci)
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report recommending that the ARC
continue the item to a date uncertain with direction on site and building design issues.
Commr. Ehdaie recused herself due to a potential conflict of interest. Her residence is
within 500 feet of the proposed project.
Jonathan Emami, applicant representative, spoke in support of the project.
Keith Labus, KTGY Architects, spoke in support of the item.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Mark Woelfle, San Luis Obispo, voiced concerns over scale, undersized sewage lateral,
storm run-off; fire truck access, and parking on South Street. He did not support the
scale of a three-story project.
Clay Appleton, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project.
Suzan Ehdaie, San Luis Obispo, voiced concern for potential traffic noise and
suggested that on-site parking options be explored that would provide for more open
C space and landscaping.
ARC Minutes
December 20, 2010
Page 2
There were no further comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Wynn supported alternative site Plan E as providing for more contiguous open
space.
Commr. Curtis felt that parking was too dominant a feature with the submitted site plan
and preferred Plan E. He suggested a slight reduction in the amount of parking or
inclusion of double -loaded parking. He recommended additional tree planting and an
enlarged open space area. He suggested an on-site right -tum pocket onto South
Street, more of a break in the building along South Street, and a better solution for bike
parking.
Commr. Hopkins also favored Plan E with more parking spaces created.
The majority of the Commission endorsed a basic site plan that provides more
contiguous open space.
Commr. Wynn supported the courtyard concept and a drive aisle to the west in order to
group the open space together to provide a contiguous open space which would provide
a pedestrian -friendly open area.
On motion by Vice -Chair Duffy, seconded by Commr. Curtis, to continue the item to a
date uncertain. with direction on site and building design issues included in the staff
report, with the following amendments:
a. Condition No. 1 was reworded to read: "The Commission endorses a basic site plan
similar to Alternative Plan E as a courtyard concept to maximize usable outdoor
space with consideration of possible relocation of the drive aisle to the west side of
the site."
b. A second sentence was added to Condition No. 4: "Explore additional horizontal
and vertical articulation to elevations to reduce the overall scale, including changes
to the design and orientation of rooflines."
c. A second sentence was added to Condition No. 6: "Consider subtle variations in the
2
modifying."
AYES: Commrs. Curtis, Hopkins, McCovey-Good, Wynn, Duffy, and Palazzo
NOES: None
RECUSED: Commr. Ehdaie
ABSENT: None
The motion passed on a 6:0 vote.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
ARC Minutes
December 20, 2010 •
Page 3
2. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast: Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
3. Commission:
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Janet Miller
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architect ral Review Commission on January 10, 2011.
Ryan Bqfz
Suoeni ina Administrative Assistant