HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-06-2016 Item 11, Neumann
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Agenda correspondence
Marx, Jan
Friday, September 02, 2016 1:08 PM
Goodwin, Heather
FW: Keep Luneta Drive Closed To Through Traffic
From: Tom Neumann [
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 8:02 PM
To: Marx, Jan; Carpenter, Dan; Ashbaugh, John; Christianson, Carlyn; Rivoire, Dan
Cc: Ann
Subject: Fw: Keep Luneta Drive Closed To Through Traffic
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
RC CEIVR-'D
SEP 0 2 2016
COUNCIL MEETING:
TTPAA Mn
1
9/�loco
My wife and I own a home one block off Luneta Drive on S. Tassajara Drive. City Transportation Division staff is
pushing forward to open the now closed Luneta Drive to through traffic. We are very concerned
and adamantly opposed to this action for safety and quality of life reasons. We understand that traffic volumes
could increase by 500 percent if Luneta Drive is opened, thus destroying this delightful part of our neighborhood
and creating significant safety issues.
We strongly encourage the City Council to place this issue on the agenda for an upcoming Council meeting.
I am a retired Caltrans transportation planner and hold a master's degree in city and regional planning from Cal
Poly. What the city is proposing is ill-conceived, given that the vision for Luneta Drive was formed some 50
years, that the city has only hastily engaged the neighborhood on one occasion because we demanded it,
and that the city has not proposed a traffic study for the Foothill/Broad Street area. Public engagement and a
traffic study must be done before making such drastic changes to Luneta Drive.
The opening of Luneta Drive to through traffic will drastically alter the calm nature of the street. Luneta Drive was
not designed to accommodate traffic as Ramona Drive was. We travel Ramona Drive daily and it operates quite
well, even with the transit buses and commercial trucks. Luneta Drive, on the other hand, is hilly with
curves, attracts pedestrians, bicyclists, runners, dog walkers, and children. These folks know Luneta Drive provides
some safety that Foothill Blvd and Ramona Drive cannot and will never provide. We who are residents have already
been squeezed out by the vast amount of student rentals and encroached upon by student traffic, much of it
reckless. Luneta Drive's closed portion offers us the only respite we have from the constant student traffic in our
neighborhood. Why change that?
It is not students we are opposed to. Our own daughter who lives with us is a Cal Poly student. We ourselves are
Cal Poly graduates. It is the invitation for more student traffic in a residential neighborhood that is already
saturated with student rentals and student traffic. Do residents not matter in San Luis Obispo anymore?
Also of paramount concern is a dangerous intersection close to our home. There is a two-way stop sign at S.
Tassajara Drive and Luneta Drive (Luneta does the stopping). We have witnessed countless cars blow through that
intersection without stopping. Though traffic volumes are now low, it is a dangerous intersection because S.
Tassajara Drive is a steep hill and many students live in the area. The majority of vehicles speed through the
intersection, failing to see that there is a two-way stop. We can see the intersection from multiple windows in
our home. Opening Luneta Drive to through traffic will dramatically increase traffic volumes at this intersection and
create a recipe for disaster.
Neighborhood residents were told by SLO Transportation Division Director Tim Bochum that he has no choice but
to open Luneta Drive to through traffic based on the 1960s plan unless the City Council directs him to do otherwise.
We ask the City Council to discuss this issue at an upcoming Council meeting before it is too late.
Thank you.
Tom and Ann Neumann
130 S. Tassajara Drive, San Luis Obispo