HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-05-2017 ARC Correspondence - Item 2 (Cooper)Existing Context
Honorable Chair and Fellow Commissioners -
I respectfully disagree with the following statement included in your Resolution No.
ARC-17: “The project design maintains consistency with the City’s Community
Design Guidelines by providing architectural interest and an attractive style which
complements the character and scale of the existing neighborhood.”
Please take note of the following excerpts from the Community Design Guidelines
(with emphasis on the underlined statements).
“Although it is not the intent of the design guidelines to require any particular
architectural style in new construction, it is important that the design of proposed
development consider the site surroundings, so that,where appropriate, the project
will be compatible with and "fit" into an area with a clearly defined character that
is valued by the community. Therefore, an understanding of the architectural styles
found locally can be helpful in considering design alternatives.
Consider the context. Review existing development near the site and consider how
the project can be designed to fit in with the best examples of appropriate site
design and architecture in the vicinity of the site.
Coordinate the new with the old. When new construction is proposed on a site with
existing structures that are to be retained, the new work should be designed to
coordinate with old structures that have architectural and/or historic value.”
Even though Gennaro’s Grill & Garden (450 Marsh Street) and 412 Marsh Street do not
appear on the “Master List of Historic Resources” they are nevertheless excellent
examples of Craftsman Bungalow. The architect should make every effort to consider the
site surroundings and respond to the architectural value of these structures.
Thank you!
Allan Cooper, SLO