HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-16-2017 BAC Agenda Packet1
MISSION: The purpose of the Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) is to provide
oversight and policy direction on matters related to bicycle transportation in San
Luis Obispo and its relationship to bicycling outside the City.
ROLL CALL: Lea Brooks (Chair), Ken Kienow (Vice Chair), Jenna Espinosa, Timothy Jouet,
Layla Lopez, Jonathan Roberts, and Howard Weisenthal
PUBLIC COMMENT:
At this time, the public is invited to address the Committee concerning items not on the agenda but are
of interest to the public and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Bicycle Advisory Committee.
The Committee may not discuss or take action on issues that are not on the agenda other than to briefly
respond to statements made or questions raised, or to ask staff to follow up on such issues.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 21, 2017 (Attachment 1)
1. PRESENTATION ITEM: City Fiscal Health Contingency Plan (15 min) – Grigsby
2. PRESENTATION ITEM: Capital Facilities Fee Program Nexus Study Update (20 min) -- Fowler
3. ACTION ITEM: Transition to an Active Transportation Committee (60 min) -- Fukushima
4. Committee Items
o Adopt-a-Trails Subcommittee (5 min) – Brooks
5. Project Updates (15 min) – Fukushima
COMMITTEE AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (5 min)
ADJOURNMENT: The next regular meeting will be held January 18, 2018
Agenda
Bicycle Advisory Committee
Council Hearing Room, City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo
(Location may move to the Council Chambers if necessary)
Thursday, November 16, 2017 – 6:00 pm (Note earlier time)
The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs, and
activities. Please contact the Clerk or staff liaison prior to the meeting if you require assistance.
2
ITEMS:
1. PRESENTATION ITEM: City Fiscal Health Contingency Plan (15 min) – Grigsby
City Council has approved activation of the Fiscal Health Contingency Plan (FHCP) due to the
dramatic increase in the costs and slowing revenue growth for the California Public Employees’
Retirement System, otherwise known as CalPERS. The FHCP is a broad document and includes a
variety of strategies, both short and long‐term, to achieve financial sustainab ility. Significant
work will be occurring over the next few months and during the 2017‐18 Fiscal Year to contain
costs and implement the Fiscal Responsibility and Sustainability Major City Goal work program
to address long‐ term structural budget issues. Presentation by Public Works Director, Daryl
Grigsby.
2. PRESENTATION ITEM: Capital Facilities Fee Program Nexus Study Update (20
min) – Fowler
The City is in the process of updating the fees charged to new development for a range of
transportation, parks, general government, public safety, and water & sewer capital facilities
that are important to the City’s future and quality of life. While the existing development
impact fee programs have served an important role in funding infrastructure improvements for
the last twenty years, an update to this program is needed given changing economic
circumstances, new Specific Plans, and the City’s recently adopted public financing policies. The
transportation component of this work effort includes a variety of multimodal projects
including intersections & corridor improvements, protected bikeways and transit facilities. A
preliminary maximum fee schedule has been prepared based on the cost of these facilities and
improvements to ensure that new development provides adequate funding to meet its needs.
City Council reviewed those maximum fees during a study session on October 17, 2017. The
staff report and the preliminary maximum fee schedule for the transportation component of
the fee program update can be found at:
http://opengov.slocity.org/weblink/1/doc/68484/Page1.aspx
This item will be an opportunity for the committee to provide input on the transportation
component of the Capital Facilities Fee Program update.
3. ACTION ITEM: Consideration of Transition to an Active Transportation
Committee (60 min) – Fukushima
This action item will consider amendments to the bylaws to expand the role of the committee
to include both bicycle and pedestrian transportation as well as amend the name of the
committee to the Active Transportation Committee.
Discussion:
3
Updates to City policy over the last few years including the Land Use and Circulation Element of
the General Plan and the Climate Change Action Plan have called for the adoption of a City
Pedestrian Plan. Given this policy requirement as well as the need to update the Bicycle
Transportation Plan, city staff is beginning the process of creating an Active Transportation Plan
(ATP) to include both bicycle and pedestrian modes of transportation . The ATP will incorporate
and build upon what is in the existing Bicycle Transportation Plan as well as add a pedestrian
component. Combining both modes under one plan will improve the City’s competitiveness for
California Active Transportation Program funding as well as improve the interaction of bicycle
and pedestrian facilities and policies. Since the scope of the ATP will cover both bicycle and
pedestrian transportation modes, consideration should be made on whether the Bicycle
Advisory Committee should also transition to an Active Transportation Committee to fully
provide oversight and policy direction for both travel modes in the development of the P lan.
Transitioning to an Active Transportation Committee would require amending the committee’s
bylaws, which would need to be approved by the City Council.
Background:
At the March 16, 2017 meeting, the BAC considered transitioning to an Active Transportation
Committee. After committee discussion, a motion was made in favor of the transition but was
not passed with a majority of the committee. However, at that meeting a motion passed
unanimously to continue discussion at a future meeting.
At the September 21, 2017 BAC meeting, staff gave an update on the Active Transportation
Plan progress and that time there was interest among the committee members to bring the
issue back for consideration.
Staff Recommendation: Recommend bylaw amendments to the City Council to expand the
mission of the committee to include bicycle and pedestrian transportation and to change the
name of the committee to the Active Transportation Committee.
4. PRESENTATION ITEM: Committee Items (5 min)
• Adopt-a-Trails Subcommittee – Brooks
5. Project and Committee Updates (15 min)
• December Special Meeting (zoning update and other items)
• Broad Street Bike Boulevard Meeting Dec 11th
• Madonna and Los Osos Valley Road Paving
• Bob Jones Trail: Calle Joaquin to Oceanaire
• Laurel Lane Project
• Items for next meeting
4
✓ _____________________________________________________
✓ _____________________________________________________
✓ _____________________________________________________
COMMITTEE AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (5 min)
The next regularly scheduled meeting will be held: January 18, 2018
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Minutes of the September 21, 2017 BAC meeting
2. Minor Bike Project Wish List
3. Transportation Review Tables
1
2
3
DRAFT Minutes 4
Bicycle Advisory Committee 5
Council Hearing Room, City Hall, 990 Palm St, San Luis Obispo 6
Thursday, September 21, 2017 at 6:00 p.m. 7
8
9
MISSION: 10
The purpose of the Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) is to provide oversight and policy 11
direction on matters related to bicycle transportation in San Luis Obispo and its relationship to 12
bicycling outside the City. 13
14
Lea Brooks (Chair) called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 15
16
ROLL CALL: 17
Present: Lea Brooks (Chair), Howard Weisenthal (Vice Chair), Ken Kienow, Jonathan Roberts, 18
Jenna Espinosa, Timothy Jouet, and Layla Lopez 19
Absent: 20
Staff: Active Transportation Manager Adam Fukushima, Associate Planner Kyle Bell, Recording 21
Secretary Lareina Gamboa 22
23
Public Comments on Items Not on the Agenda 24
Jeff Brubaker, Transportation Planner with SLOCOG, informed the committee that the Long 25
Range 2019 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is currently in development. The RTP is a 26
document with a 20+ year horizon that focuses on issues affecting our quality of life and 27
environment for future growth and development of the San Luis Obispo region. (SLOCOG will 28
collect input and provide more information at SLOCOG.org) 29
30
Sarah Flickinger, resident, encouraged protected intersections at LOVR and South Higuera, 31
LOVR and Tank Farm Rd., South Higuera and Suburban Rd., South Higuera and Tank Farm 32
Rd., and South Higuera and Prado Rd., with the possibility of dedicated signal cycles for 33
pedestrians and cyclists. 34
35
MINUTES: July 20, 2017 36
No amendments were suggested. 37
38
CM Jouet motioned to approve the Minutes with no amendments. CM Lopez seconded the 39
motion. The motion passed unanimously. 40
41
DISCUSSION ITEMS 42
43
Agenda Item #1: Bicycle Education Contract Services 44
Michael Velasquez, Education Director of Bike SLO County, gave a presentation on the 45
achievements and a few challenges with the bicycle education services that it provides to the 46
City under contract. 47
48
Attachment 1, Page 1 of 4
Public Comment: 49
Sarah Flickinger, resident, suggested reaching out to Chamber of Commerce or Business 50
members informing them these are funded events. Also, creating small tutorial areas at events 51
like Sherriff’s Day and Children’s Day in the Plaza would really help children learn bicycle riding 52
skills. 53
54
Myron Amerine, resident, mentioned how Fort Collins, Colorado started a program of an 55
interactive presentation for professional drivers as well as cyclists which resulted in a significant 56
decrease in bicycle accidents. 57
58
Kim Bisheff, resident, thanked the City for the Bicycle Education services, which has allowed 59
her and fellow residents the comfort in knowing that children can be safer riding to and from 60
school daily. Bisheff also greatly encourages the city to reach out more to the high school to 61
decrease automobile traffic at peak hours. There is desire for new riders, they just need the staff 62
support and programming to achieve this. 63
64
Committee discussion centered on ways to get the message out about the Bicycle Education 65
services. Suggestions included reaching out to local bike shops and thinking strategically about 66
new groups to target for outreach. 67
68
Agenda Item #2: Zoning Regulations Update 69
Kyle Bell gave a presentation on the effort to update the Zoning Regulations relative to bicycle 70
transportation. 71
72
73
Public Comment: 74
Myron Amerine, expressed the same desire to include bicycle parking in depth like the 7 pages 75
of vehicle parking guidelines receive. 76
77
Sarah Flickinger, would also like to see the bicycle parking bumped up to 20% minimum. For 78
every vehicle parking spot, 20% of that space should be equivalent to bicycle parking spaces. 79
Bicycle parking should be accessible from the street and not tucked behind a building, and 80
should include larger spaces for cargo bikes. If cars receive both street parking and parking 81
structures, bikes should receive an equivalent designated percentage of parking space. 82
Flickinger also presented the idea of having a new businesses and change of ownership 83
businesses pay a fee in lieu to the city to help fund off-site bike parking spots and/or structures. 84
85
Gary Havas, resident, suggested that staff and committee take a look at Flagstaff, Arizona’s 86
verbiage on bicycle rules, laws, and parking. It is laid out directly for easy reading and 87
understanding. 88
89
James Park, resident, would bike more if the lanes were protected. 90
91
Jeff Brubaker, brought a comment from a Rideshare staff member, to encourage the city to 92
include the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordinance, which educates and 93
encourages employees to use alternative transportation, into the zoning regulations update. 94
And, to consider joining the MTC in regards to creating a bike station or bike central in the 95
development of the new transit center. 96
97
Committee discussion 98
Attachment 1, Page 2 of 4
99
• The number of bicycle parking spaces should reflect the Circulation Element objective 100
for 20% bicycle trips City wide. 101
• Explore opportunity to incorporate where bicycle parking may be located within the 102
Zoning Regulations rather than Engineering Code and Community Design Guidelines. 103
• Consider bike parking requirements for parking structures 104
• Consider an in-lieu fee program downtown to provide public bicycle parking throughout 105
downtown. 106
• Consider basing bike parking on Land Use instead of Zone. 107
• Consider provisions for providing bicycle parking for cargo bicycles. 108
• There was general consensus that long term bicycle parking should meet minimum 109
building code requirements, but preference should be to provide for short term parking, 110
in conjunction with the existing requirement for 2 bicycle parking spaces per unit. 111
112
113
Agenda Item #3: Unleashed Dogs on Trails 114
This item was postponed to the next meeting in regards to time. 115
116
Agenda Item #4: Active Transportation Plan (ATP) Update 117
Adam Fukushima gave an update on the effort to expand the Bicycle Transportation Plan scope 118
to include pedestrians, creating an Active Transportation Plan. 119
120
Public Comment: 121
Sarah Flickinger, mentioned that if the committee were to evolve this could open up more 122
opportunities for grant money and other funding. And suggested creating an interactive trouble 123
spot map to engage pedestrians and seniors more. 124
125
Myron Amerine, brought up that the bike facilities still need improvements and that the graded 126
shoulders do not meet the state requirements as they are now. If those are improved, it would 127
keep cyclists off the sidewalk and pedestrians off the bike lane. 128
129
Committee discussion included how the Active Transportation Plan chapters would be divided. 130
There was also discussion about the pros and cons of expanding the scope of the BAC to 131
include pedestrians. It was requested that the topic of transforming into an Active Transportation 132
Committee be placed on the agenda for the next meeting. 133
134
135
Agenda Item #5: Committee Items 136
• Adopt-a-Trails subcommittee 137
No information was presented. 138
139
Agenda Item #6: Project Updates 140
• San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch have both been approved with a certified EIR. There 141
are design issues concerning the public which can be brought back for input. 142
• The committee will be informed about the Froom Ranch when there is something 143
substantial to present. 144
• Lea Brooks gave an update on the Octagon Barn construction including the left turn lane 145
into the Barn. 146
• An encroachment permit was issued to Bike SLO County for the installation of a Ghost 147
Bike at the intersection of Foothill and Ferrini Streets in honor of Kennedy Love. 148
Attachment 1, Page 3 of 4
Sarah Flickinger, requested the LOVR construction be divided up into two parts, north and 149
south, so as not to create the same two-way traffic jam the Madonna road construction is 150
creating. 151
152
COMMITTEE AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS 153
No announcements at this time. 154
155
ADJOURN 156
157
CM Kienow motioned to adjourn the meeting at 8:35 p.m. to the next regular meeting of 158
November 16, 2017. CM Weisenthal seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 159
160
Respectfully submitted, 161
162
Lareina Gamboa 163
Recording Secretary 164
165
Attachment 1, Page 4 of 4
Project Status Notes Cost Priority
drainage grate upgrades at San Luis Drive (north of
Johnson), California at CHP office, 2 at Santa Barbara at
Broad, Broad SB near South Street, Madonna near S.
Higuera high
green bike lanes in front of Marigold Plaza on Los Osos
Valley Road Near completion high
bike lane improvements on LOVR bridge Near completion $36k high
replace concrete landing on Jennifer Street Bridge
$10-
20k high
Improvements to path between Sinsheimer Park and RRST
request forwarded to
School District
School Dist not able to bring
improvements at this time medium
sharrow on Monterey st by the Fremont theatre medium
Actuation for Bikes on Broad and Upham crossing medium
Ped and bike crossing improvements on South St at King medium
flip stop signs on Morro and Pismo to favor bike blvd medium
Ped improvements on South St at King medium
bike box at Chorro / Foothill in engineering phase medium
Address car parking in bike lane on EB South St medium
pavement maintenance at Monday Club bridge over creek low
correct light angled on Jennifer St bridge
need clarification of
light location low
install sharrows and signage on Chorro between Palm and
Monterey
anticipated as part of
Broad Street Bike
Blvd construction low
King Street to Meadow Park ramp low
drainage issues in bike lane on Orcutt near Tank Farm low
flip yield sign on Jennifer Street bridge low
removal of bollards on pathway at Exposition and Bridge
streets low
Remove/move side railing on Jennifer Street Bridge low
Parking removed on California Street at Higuera to improve
sight distance for bike lane Completed!medium
improve delination between bike lane and travel lane on Completed!medium
green bike lanes on Santa Rosa at Olive completed!$30k high
Improve delineation between bike lane and travel lane on
southbound S. Higuera to Madonna Rd completed!high
Remove bollards on the path behind Monday Club Completed! high
removal of three parking spaces on NB California Blvd at
Marsh Completed!high
Remove single bollard on Railroad Safety Trail at
George/Jennifer Street trailhead Completed!
The three bollards on the curb
ramp make this single bollard
on the trailhead redundant high
Yield markings and a push button beacon at the Broad
Street at Upham ped crossing Completed!high
Last Updated: 11/09/2017
Minor Bike Project Wish List: Annual Allocation $100k
Attachment 2, Page 1 of 1
Transportation
Attachment 3, Page 1 of 11
Maximum Transportation Development Impact FeesSan Luis Obispo Capital Facilities Fee Nexus Analysis; EPS #161187Land UseResidential Single Family $6,858.67 per Unit $12,383.75 per UnitMultifamily$5,389.06 per Unit $9,730.28 per Unit Non-Residential Office/Service $8.35 per Sq.Ft.$15.07 per Sq.Ft.Retail $29.45 per Sq.Ft.$53.18 per Sq.Ft.Industrial$10.89 per Sq.Ft.$19.66 per Sq.Ft.Institutional $8.35 per Sq.Ft.$15.07 per Sq.Ft.Hotel $3,056.15 per Room $5,518.07 per RoomSources: City of San Luis Obispo; and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.North AreaTable S-1South AreaEconomic & Planning Systems, Inc. 9/25/2017 P:\161000s\161187SLO_CFF\Data\Transportation\TransportationFee_092217NewAttachment 3, Page 2 of 11
North
Sa
nta
R
o
s
a
N
orth
Sa
nta
R
o
s
a
C
alif
o
rnia
C
a
lif
o
r
n
i
aS
a
n
t
a
R
o
s
a
Tank Farm
Foothill
Tank Farm
T a n k F a r mSouthHiguera
TankFarm
Fo o t h i l lSout
hHi
gueraSouthHigueraL
os
O
so
s
V
alle
y
L
o
s
Os
o
s
Va
lle
y
S
a
n
t
a
Ro
s
a
W e s t F o o t h il lWestFoothillLos
O
sosValley
B
r
o
a
d
H igu eraL
o
s
Os
os
Va
ll
e
y HigueraHigueraMa d onn a
Ma do nn a
M arsh
M arsh
OrcuttChorroOrc
u
t
t
M o n te reyHighlandJ
o
h
n
s
o
n
J
o
h
ns
o
n
JohnsonCaliforniaGrand
Gr
a
n
d
I n d u s tri a lP ism o
C
h
o
rr
o
C
h
o
r
r
o
Prado Pism o
C a p it o li oOs
o
s
High
Pal m
South
Orcutt
Pal m
Os
o
s
LaurelOrcuttSantaBarbaraO'Conn
o
r
TaftBroad
VachellMo
rr
o
Mo
rr
o
Murray
MeadowM illMi llCollegeC a m p u s
SanLuisGranada
F i e r oSuburbanBishopPrefumoCanyon
Ae roHooverBuckley
Buckley
Bu
c
kley
F ro o m R a n c h
A u t o P a rkParkerLongSacra
me
n
t
o
U p h am
W a ln u tT
o
r
o
SantaFeH o ov e r
To
ro
El
Mercad
o
ElksCalleJoaquinP a cificHighland
LaurelM o n talb a n
Syd n ey
Southwood
ShortSantaFeSouthwood
Pacif icRoyal LaEntradaHind
L iz zi e
McmillanSouthTassajaraBeebeeB u c ho n
B u cho n
Bridge
Meinecke
Ni
p
o
moNip
om
o
LagunaCasaPatriciaClarion
H
o
ll
y
ho
c
kNorthTassajaraB
r
o
a
d
DescansoRamona
SacramentoO live
D
a
l
idi
o
E lla
RoyalM on te rey
A
u
g
u
st
aGa
r
d
e
n
Augusta
A e rov istaVenture
Cross ViaCarta
Bor
onda
Ramona
WavertreeDexterAndrewsMountBishop
P
e
p
p
e
r
L in c o ln
Os
o
s IslayPeachPeach
Oak
H
e
dley BuenaVistaWoodbridge
K
erry IslayStennerG
alle
o
n
Poi
ns
et
t
i
a
P
oinsettia
Ken dallKingSi
erra
West
Zaca
Maple
G a rcia
A t a s c a d e r o
Ocea
n
air
e
OceanaireVia E ste b a nJeffrey
S p itfire
Bonetti
Tanglewood
Mornin
g
Glo
r
y
Tangl ew ood
F u ll e r
H igueraFredericks
OldWindmillD
el
Rio Walk
e
r
EmpleoRoundhouse
Slack
EmpresaRica rdoAirportLosCerrosFontana
Luneta
L
e
mo
n
M o n t e V ista
RailroadSandercock
SueldoFarmhouseFerrini
Mission
Je
n
n
if
e
r
BrookpineUni
versityCreeksideVista
MitchellNo
rt
hC
ho
r
r
oMccollum
Branch
SpanishOa k sC h urc h
A
r
c
h
e
r
P alm
Blu ebe llDuncanF e r n w o o d
L e ffStafford
Le ffChumash
P
ere
ira
Phillips
Las Praderas
C
a
r
mel
Stoneridge SanLuisCar
p
enter
H athw ayB
e
a
c
h
Center
D
e
v
a
ul
R
a
n
c
h
DavenportCreekWestmont
HighChorroCuesta
La
Virad
a
EtoK
e
n
t
uckyV iew mont
Coriander
Ro
bert
o
P oly Vue
Mig
u
elit
o
BasilBrook
AlicitaPine Fi
xli
ni
WardLa CitaLosVerdes
B re ck
Three
Sisters ElPaseoPolyCan yo n
Los Palos
S m ith
Bianchi
M u t s u hit o
H
e
nry
R
u
t
h
BottomwoodSenderoAlyssumMount ainC ay u co sCamd
e
n
MelloL a k e view RichardTolosa
RositaH um b e rtRougeot
S w e e n e yBenton
ThreadLawnwoodSte
ph
a
ni
e
Fontana
MagnoliaBirch
Montecito EllenSycamoreF
ai
rway Cuyama
CalleJazminSan M a t e oCastilloL
aPos
adaVerdeAbbott
F ra n c is
EdgewoodHuttonStoryHarrisCypressPriceSydneyBin
n
s
Elm
J
e
a
n ConejoSawleaf
OldSanteFe
P e r k in s
E l C a p ita n
Warren
C o rdo v aPurpl
eSageFunstonAlmon
d
P h illip sLarkspur
Craig
Del C a m in o sSisquocSantaLuciaWestNewport M a nz anitaCenter
HorizonH illcre stPalomarWilson
Cazadero
Q u ailMalibu
ViaSanBlas
B ou g a invill eaGarnette
Mor
a
b
itoMuirf
i
el
dGarfield
Bond
T
o
nini
CalleLupita Vic
t
ori
a
Pin
e
c
o
v
e
ProspectAndrews
Cl ov e r
DelNorte
C a lle C ro ta lo
M o u n ta in V i e w
FeltonSkyline
Hays
D a n aHope
C o ra l
Caudill
CerroRomauldo
Hel
e
n
a
B
o
y
s
e
nSanCarlos
EsperanzaJespersonV ia E ns enada Blu e rock
VistadelColla
d
os Vi
a
Ca
rt
aLa V ine d a
H
u
as
n
a
Vic
e
n
t
e
Corrida
Woodsid e
Loomis LoomisSerranoHeights
GatheB
alb
oa
TiburonLawrence
R
o
c
k
vie
wGoldenrod
Evans
V i llage
Fl
o
r
a
Fl
o
r
a
MountBishop
Buena VistaCrandall
EstelitaP
ar
k
LompocE
l
Tig
r
e
Ro
sePrinc
e
t
onBushnellVi
s
t
adel
ArroyoKentwoodRafaelBayLeafWilding
AlleneRachelThelma
LomaBonita
S
t
a
nf
o
r
d
DelSur
Alde
r
S
u
nflo
w
er
S
a
n
Adri
an
o
Florence
S
p
o
o
n
erMirad
a LongviewAlbert
GaribaldiSantaYnezCuesta
M ariposa BlvddelCampoCreekside Gr
o
v
ePat
r
ic
i
aCorralitosP
as
ati
empoVista
delLago
IronbarkHill
F
or
e
manKare
n
P icoOleaSo laChaplin
PortolaR ich
G eo rg e
P
a
r
kl
a
n
d
Jan iceSequoiaHiddenSpringsChuparrosa Kl
ama
t
hBuckeyeG e rda
L ilyLynnWelsh
Marlene
Daly
Deseret
RebaFletcher
ElCentro
Popul
us
Chu rc h
Yarrow
D eA nzaLaLun aJaliscoIris
M a r i goldDa
rt
mout
hF
a
r
r
i
e
r
Sin
gle
tre
e GravesHendersonCapistrano
Madro
ne
Lo belia
S an
M a rc o s
NojoquiClearvie
w
Claire LaCanadaRosem aryChristina Boxwood
S
e
q
u
oia
Bl
uebellBrizzolaraDeerCambriaColumbineRanc
ho
Canyon
M arshaBritt
a
ny
V e g aFrambuesa
Harmony
FelMar
El
C
errito
Tulip
AraliaCastaicCavalierN
ew
p
ort
P a r tridge LeonaBeechTruckee
BriarwoodSantaMari
a
Li
ma
Maple PinnaclesHansen
C haparral
Ashmore
Tarragon
C y c la m e n
Il
eneCec e lia
Felicia
G
r
et
a
JaneCa mpusOakridge
S
u
n
s
e
t
Mason
S
u
n
r
o
s
e
Venable
CrestviewT
a
h
o
eMontrose
AlritaH azelOr
a
ngeBa rrancaCarolynMiraSol
DrakeMu
sta
n
g
Cucaracha
Hathway
MuguS
antaCla ra
Woodland
S
w
ee
t
b
a
yAlHilLexingtonAnacapaGulf
T
win
Rid
ge
Ambrosia
Huckle
berryPa
c
hec
oS e a ward LawtonBedfordAvalo
n
W isteriaDel Mar
Snapdragon
C
o
u
p
er
Cachuma
Ojai
PaseoBellaMontana
SantaFeH erm o sa
Isabella KingWoodbridgeIris
F ix lin iLosVerdes
LosPalosOceanaireHighland
CerroRomauldo
Murray
PoinsettiadelBrisa
EarthoodDaisyCherryVioletAsterBlackberry Plum
Sage
Junipero
CantoMargarita
D iabloViaLagunaVista
Kila
rn
e
y
Donegal
Arroyo Valle VistaNasellaPoa
SlenderRock
FennelLavenderWi llo w
Figure 1: City of San Luis Obispo, North and South Area
aliiff
oo
fff
rrnnniiiaaaa
ttt
aaa
HHH yyhhh
ooooo
rr
o nLLLuiisLL iinn ccc ooo lllnn
HHHH iigggguueeerrraaalll North N trNorotNNootrthoNorhhhtrorthNooortrtoohthrNhhoNtooNthooNototNothrotrohorNtotNthoortNohothhoohhorthtorotoohNNotrthNrhaaRRRRRooo
ssssss
aaaa
CCCCCC
hhhhhhhhhhh
o OOOOOOss
oo
ss
MMoooooo
rrrrrrrrrrrr
oooo ArearAAAraaeAaAAreaArAAaAAaAeArearaAAAAAareAaAeaAaAAeAaAArereAaeAreeeeaArearaeAaArArAerAAAeareAHHHHHHiiiiiggguuuuuueeeeeerrrrrraaaaaarrrrrrrrMMMMMMMMMMoooooooooonnnntttteeeeerreeyyHHHH
G dZ EEEmmmrrreeSSuueelllddSouthSSShuoouthtShthuthououSouth AreaAreaeArAAAAeAAAaeAaAraAAaAAAAAAAreAAAaarAeaAaAaAaAAreBBBoooonnnneeeettttttttttiiimmmmmmpppplllleeeeoooEEEEEEmmppprrrddddoooo Attachment 3, Page 3 of 11
Table 1Summary of Transportation Capital Improvement Projects in Fee Program San Luis Obispo Capital Facilities Fee Nexus Analysis; EPS #161187Improvement CategoryCostPercentageInterchange (1)$78,822,72028.6%Intersection $46,920,00017.0%Street Widening ( 2)$38,231,27813.9%Street Extension$44,283,50016.1%Pedestrian/ Bicycle$58,000,00021.0%Transit$6,500,0002.4%Other (3)$2,900,0001.1%Total (4)$275,657,498100.0%(1) Includes financing costs for Highway 101/Prado Road Interchange and Highway 101/LOVR Interchange.(2) Includes financing costs for the Prado Road Bridge West of Higuera.(3) Other includes South Broad Street medians corridor improvements and the traffic volume count program and traffic model.(4) List reflects new projects needed to serve anticipated new development and does not include all future projects the City may undertake. Sources: City of San Luis Obispo; Wallace Group; Cambridge Systematics; and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 9/25/2017 P:\161000s\161187SLO_CFF\Data\Transportation\TransportationFee_092217NewAttachment 3, Page 4 of 11
Table 2 Summary of Capital Improvement Cost AllocationsSan Luis Obispo Capital Facilities Fee Nexus Analysis; EPS #161187ItemCost % Total Transportation Costs (including financing)1$275,657,498 100%Regional Funding2$33,115,700 12%Existing Development3$66,878,472 24%New Growth Cost Allocation4$175,663,326 64%1 Includes financing costs for Highway 101/Prado Road Interchange and Highway 101/LOVR Interchange and the Prado Road Bridge West of Higuera that sum to $43.3 million.2 Represents estimate of costs to be covered by regional funding sources.3 Represents portion of improvement costs that support existing development and/oraddress existing deficiencies.4 Does not include adjustments for existing fee balances.Sources: City of San Luis Obispo; Wallace Group; Cambridge Systematics; and Economic &Planning Systems, Inc.Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 9/25/2017 P:\161000s\161187SLO_CFF\Data\Transportation\TransportationFee_092217NewAttachment 3, Page 5 of 11
Table 3Costs per Trip by GeographySan Luis Obispo Capital Facilities Fee Nexus Analysis; EPS #161187Average CostGeographyTotal Costs Percentage Net Costs1Trips (ADT) Percentageper Trip (ADT)North Area$25,029,451 14.2% $24,143,02059,509 23.1%$405.70South Area$150,633,87585.8%$145,299,097198,35576.9%$732.52 Total/ Average $175,663,326 100.0% $169,442,117 257,865 100.0% $657.102 New trips represents new Average Daily Trips (ADT) associated with the City's new growth capacity.Sources: City of San Luis Obispo and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.New Trips2Cost Allocations to New Development1 Removes existing transportation impact fee fund balances from the total costs allocated to new growth. Latest fee balances available from City (June 30, 2016) indicate a total fee balance of about $6.22 million, including $5.14 million in Citywide Transportation Impact Fee fund and $1.08 million in Airport Area Impact Fee Fund. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 9/25/2017 P:\161000s\161187SLO_CFF\Data\Transportation\TransportationFee_092217NewAttachment 3, Page 6 of 11
Table 4 Maximum Fee Calculation by Trips Generation by Land Use and by AreaSan Luis Obispo Capital Facilities Fee Nexus Analysis; EPS #161187Land UseAverage Cost per TripResidential Single Family16.91 per unit$6,858.67 per Unit$12,383.75 per UnitMultifamily13.28 per unit$5,389.06 per Unit$9,730.28 per Unit Non-Residential Office/Service (1)20.57 per 1,000 sq.ft.$8.35 per Sq.Ft.$15.07 per Sq.Ft.Retail (2)72.60 per 1,000 sq.ft. $29.45 per Sq.Ft.$53.18 per Sq.Ft.Industrial26.84 per 1,000 sq.ft. $10.89 per Sq.Ft.$19.66 per Sq.Ft.Institutional (3)20.57 per 1,000 sq.ft.$8.35 per Sq.Ft.$15.07 per Sq.Ft.Hotel (4)7.53 per room$3,056.15 per Room$5,518.07 per Room(1) Trip generation rates based on an average of office and service trip rates provided by City staff/ Cambridge Systematics.(2) Trip generation rates based on an average of low and medium retail trip rates provided by City staff/ Cambridge Systematics.(3) Trip generation rates based on office/service trip rates provided by City staff/ Cambridge Systematics.(4) Trip generation rates based on motel trip rates provided by City staff/ Cambridge Systematics.Sources: City of San Luis Obispo; Cambridge Systematics; and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.$405.70$732.52Trip (ADT)Generation RatesSouth AreaNorth AreaEconomic & Planning Systems, Inc. 9/25/2017 P:\161000s\161187SLO_CFF\Data\Transportation\TransportationFee_092217NewAttachment 3, Page 7 of 11
Table A-1 Transportation Model Growth Forecasts by Land Use and by Area (1)San Luis Obispo Capital Facilities Fee Nexus Analysis; EPS #161187Land UseCitywide North South Citywide North South Citywide North SouthResidential (Dwelling Units)Single Family 8,289 6,981 1,308 3,102 985 2,117 11,391 7,966 3,425Multifamily 12,0849,2082,8763,0348872,14715,11810,0955,023Total Residential Units20,373 16,189 4,184 6,136 1,872 4,264 26,509 18,061 8,448 Non-Residential (Sq.Ft.)Office/Service2,487,6031,607,157 880,447 3,911,560 635,783 3,275,777 6,399,163 2,242,940 4,156,223Retail5,290,842 1,787,679 3,503,163 1,043,493 212,494 830,999 6,334,335 2,000,173 4,334,162Industrial2,987,985 152,910 2,835,075 115,185 2,418 112,767 3,103,170 155,328 2,947,842Institutional340,771311,60729,16544,43961643,822385,210312,22372,987Total Non-Residential Sq.Ft. 11,107,201 3,859,352 7,247,849 5,114,677 851,312 4,263,365 16,221,878 4,710,664 11,511,214Hotel (Rooms) 2,183 1,601 582 651 331 320 2,834 1,932 902(1) Transportation model growth forecasts based on growth capacity. As a result, growth forecasts are greater than the General Plan growth forecasts that focus on potential growth through 2035. Sources: City of San Luis Obispo; and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.ExistingGrowthBuildoutEconomic & Planning Systems, Inc. 9/25/2017 P:\161000s\161187SLO_CFF\Data\Transportation\TransportationFee_092217NewAttachment 3, Page 8 of 11
Table A-2 Trip Generation Associated with Growth Forecasts by Land Use and by AreaSan Luis Obispo Capital Facilities Fee Nexus Analysis; EPS #161187Land UseCitywide North South Citywide North South Citywide North SouthResidential Single Family16.91 per unit140,131 118,019 22,11352,441 16,652 35,789192,573 134,671 57,902Multifamily13.28 per unit160,515122,31338,20340,30211,78228,519200,817134,09566,722Subtotal300,647 240,331 60,31592,743 28,434 64,309393,390 268,766 124,624 Non-Residential Office/Service (1) 20.57 per 1,000 sq.ft. 51,169 33,059 18,11080,45913,078 67,381131,628 46,136 85,492Retail (2)72.60 per 1,000 sq.ft. 384,089 129,777 254,31375,753 15,426 60,326459,842 145,203 314,639Industrial26.84 per 1,000 sq.ft. 80,202 4,104 76,0973,09265 3,02783,293 4,169 79,124Institutional (3)20.57 per 1,000 sq.ft. 7,010 6,410600914139017,924 6,422 1,501Hotel (4)7.53 per room16,44512,0604,3844,9042,4932,41121,34914,5546,795Subtotal538,914 185,410 353,504165,122 31,075 134,047704,036 216,485487,551Total Trips839,561 425,741 413,820257,865 59,509 198,355 1,097,425 485,250 612,175% of Citywide100.00% 50.71% 49.29%100.00% 23.08% 76.92%100.00% 44.22% 55.78%% of Total Buildout Trips76.50% 38.79% 37.71%23.50% 5.42% 18.07%100.00% 44.22% 55.78%(1) Average Daily Trip (ADT) generation rates based on an average of office and service trip rates provided by City staff/ Cambridge Systematics.(2) Average Daily Trip (ADT) generation rates based on an average of low and medium retail trip rates provided by City staff/ Cambridge Systematics.(3) Average Daily Trip (ADT) generation rates based on office/service trip rates provided by City staff/ Cambridge Systematics.(4) Average Daily Trip (ADT) generation rates based on motel trip rates provided by City staff/ Cambridge Systematics.Sources: City of San Luis Obispo; Cambridge Systematic; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.Trip Generation ExistingGrowthBuildoutRatesEconomic & Planning Systems, Inc. 9/25/2017 P:\161000s\161187SLO_CFF\Data\Transportation\TransportationFee_092217NewAttachment 3, Page 9 of 11
Table A-3Transportation Improvement List, Cost Estimates, and Preliminary Approach to Cost AllocationSan Luis Obispo Capital Facilities Fee Nexus Analysis; EPS #161187Regional ExistingNewRegionalExistingNewNorthSouthInterchange ImprovementsProject #1Hwy 101/LOVR Interchange ImprovementsInterchange Improvements$4,926,000 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 8.8% 91.2% $0 $0 $4,926,000 $435,025 $4,490,975Project #1FHwy 101/LOVR Interchange ImprovementsFinancing$7,112,300 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 8.8% 91.2% $0 $0 $7,112,300 $628,102 $6,484,198Project #2Hwy 101/Prado Rd InterchangeInterchange Improvements$35,000,00030.0%0.0%70.0%9.7%90.3% $10,500,000$0 $24,500,000$2,380,592 $22,119,408Project #2FHwy 101/Prado Rd Interchange Financing$31,784,4200.0%0.0%100.0%9.7%90.3%$0$0$31,784,420$3,088,397$28,696,023Subtotal$78,822,720$10,500,000 $0 $68,322,720 $6,532,115 $61,790,605Intersection ImprovementsProject #3Broad & South-Santa Barbara Intersection ImprovementsIntersection Improvements$300,000 20.0% 15.0% 65.0% 17.7% 82.3% $60,000 $45,000 $195,000 $34,539 $160,461Project #4Orcutt & Tank Farm Intersection ImprovementsIntersection Improvements$1,120,000 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 32.6% 67.4% $0 $0 $1,120,000 $365,441 $754,559Project #5Broad & Tank Farm Intersection ImprovementsIntersection Improvements$1,500,000 15.0% 0.0% 85.0% 9.7% 90.3% $225,000 $0 $1,275,000 $123,888 $1,151,112Project #6Johnson & Orcutt Intersection ImprovementsIntersection Improvements$2,000,000 25.0% 0.0% 75.0% 1.7% 98.3% $500,000 $0 $1,500,000 $25,064 $1,474,936Project #7Higuera & Tank Farm Intersection ImprovementsIntersection Improvements$2,000,000 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000Project #8S. Broad Street IntersectionIntersection Improvements$5,000,00020.0%0.0%80.0%9.7%90.3%$1,000,000$0 $4,000,000$388,668$3,611,332Project #9General Plan Cumulative Intersection Control UpgradesIntersection Improvements$15,000,000 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 24.4% 75.6% $0 $0 $15,000,000 $3,661,049 $11,338,951Project #10Orcutt Rd/UPRR Grade Separation Intersection Improvements$20,000,00010.0%68.9%21.1%17.7%82.3%$2,000,000$13,770,499$4,229,501$749,144$3,480,357Subtotal$46,920,000$3,785,000 $13,815,499 $29,319,501 $5,347,793 $23,971,709Street Widening ImprovementsProject #11Higuera Widening: High St to Marsh St Street Widening$2,150,000 0.0% 76.5% 23.5% 32.6% 67.4% $0 $1,644,810 $505,190 $164,837 $340,354Project #12Higuera Widening: Madonna Rd to City LimitsStreet Widening$5,400,000 55.0% 0.0% 45.0% 5.4% 94.6% $2,970,000 $0 $2,430,000 $130,992$2,299,008Project #13Tank Farm Road WideningStreet Widening, $22,000,00030.0%0.0%70.0%9.7%90.3%$6,600,000$0 $15,400,000$1,496,372 $13,903,628Project #14Prado Rd Bridge Widening: West of Higuera St and Higuera & Prado Intersection ImprovementsStreet Widening and Intersection Improvements$4,260,00020.0%0.0%80.0%17.7%82.3%$852,000$0 $3,408,000$603,637 $2,804,363Project #14FPrado Rd. Bridge W of HigueraFinancing$4,421,2780.0%0.0%100.0%17.7%82.3%$0$0$4,421,278$783,112$3,638,166Subtotal$38,231,278$10,422,000 $1,644,810 $26,164,468 $3,178,950 $22,985,519Street Extension ImprovementsProject #15aSanta Fe Road Extension North of Tank FarmStreet Extension$1,080,000 60.0% 0.0% 40.0% 9.7% 90.3% $648,000 $0 $432,000 $41,976 $390,024Project #15bSanta Fe Road Extension South of Tank FarmStreet Extension$2,500,000 60.0% 0.0% 40.0% 9.7% 90.3% $1,500,000 $0 $1,000,000 $97,167 $902,833Project #16Horizon Lane Extension South of Tank FarmStreet Extension$3,000,000 10.0% 0.0% 90.0% 14.3% 85.7% $300,000 $0 $2,700,000 $385,044 $2,314,956Project #17Bishop St Extension to Roundhouse Street Extension$13,200,000 5.0% 72.7% 22.3% 43.0% 57.0% $660,000 $9,593,447 $2,946,553$1,266,046 $1,680,506Project #18Prado Rd Extension South Higuera to Broad Street, including Broad Street & Prado Extension Intersection ImprovementsStreet Extension and Intersection Improvements$24,503,50020.0%0.0%80.0%14.8%85.2%$4,900,700$0$19,602,800$2,903,294$16,699,506Subtotal$44,283,500$8,008,700 $9,593,447 $26,681,353 $4,693,527 $21,987,826Project NumberNameNew Cost EstimateFirst Allocation - CitywideType (e.g., Geographic Area of Benefit)Second Allocation - New by AreaSecond Allocation - New by AreaNorthSouthFirst Allocation - CitywideEconomic & Planning Systems, Inc. 9/25/2017 P:\161000s\161187SLO_CFF\Data\Transportation\TransportationFee_092217NewAttachment 3, Page 10 of 11
Regional ExistingNewRegionalExistingNewNorthSouthProject NumberNameNew Cost EstimateFirst Allocation - CitywideType (e.g., Geographic Area of Benefit)Second Allocation - New by AreaSecond Allocation - New by AreaNorthSouthFirst Allocation - CitywidePedestrian/ Bicycle ImprovementsProject #19Bob Jones TrailPedestrian/Bike Projects$11,000,0000.0%76.5%23.5%23.1%76.9%$0 $8,415,305 $2,584,695$596,489 $1,988,206Project #20Railroad Safety Trail Pedestrian/Bike Projects$12,000,0000.0%76.5%23.5%23.1%76.9%$0 $9,180,332 $2,819,668$650,715 $2,168,952Project #21aBicycle Transportation Plan Implementation North AreaPedestrian/Bike Projects$14,400,000 0.0% 76.5% 23.5% 100.0% 0.0% $0 $11,016,399 $3,383,601 $3,383,601$0Project #21bBicycle Transportation Plan Implementation South AreaPedestrian/Bike Projects$20,600,0000.0%40.0%60.0%0.0%100.0%$0$8,240,000$12,360,000$0$12,360,000Subtotal$58,000,000$0 $36,852,036 $21,147,964 $4,630,805 $16,517,159Transit ImprovementsProject #22Fleet Expansion: 4 BusesTransit Projects$1,500,0000.0%76.5%23.5%0.0%100.0%$0 $1,147,542$352,458$0$352,458Project #23Transit CenterTransit Projects$5,000,0000.0%76.5%23.5%23.1%76.9%$0$3,825,139$1,174,861$271,131$903,730Subtotal$6,500,000$0 $4,972,680 $1,527,320 $271,131 $1,256,189OtherProject #24Traffic Volume Count Program and Traffic ModelMisc.$900,000 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 24.4% 75.6% $0 $0 $900,000 $219,663 $680,337Project #25S. Broad Street MediansCorridor Improvements$2,000,00020.0%0.0%80.0%9.7%90.3%$400,000$0$1,600,000$155,467$1,444,533Subtotal$2,900,000$400,000 $0 $2,500,000 $375,130 $2,124,870Total$275,657,498$33,115,700 $66,878,472 $175,663,326 $25,029,451 $150,633,875Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 9/25/2017 P:\161000s\161187SLO_CFF\Data\Transportation\TransportationFee_092217NewAttachment 3, Page 11 of 11