HomeMy WebLinkAboutRebuttaltoArgumentinFavoroT°Py, AUTHORIZATION FOR ANOTHER PERSON TO SIGN REBUTTAL ARGUMENT
RECEIVED
The following majority of 5 authors of the Argument JUN 0 9 2017
❑ In Favor of /Against SLO CITY CLERK
Measure B-17 authorizes the following person(s) to prepare, submit or sign the Rebuttal to the Argument
in Favor of ❑ Against
Measure B-17 for the City of San Luis Obispo Special Election to be held on August 22, 2017.
Signatures of a majority of the authors of the Argument
❑ In Favor of /Against 0 4' "--,-;red:
r /9Y1 C� �� 6 e LZ
Name (Print)
ra. e (Print)
Name (Print)
gia-ffaturu,
AigriAre
5-/ �i
Date
Date
S-/3
Date
The following authors are authorized to prepare, submit or sign the Rebuttal to the Argument
Ain Favor of ❑ Against Measure '$- /?
Print Name (,l �l A ��e� Signature
I i `f
Title: C ) k—A �qf fi IAMdn1JV Date:. [,p — Ci 1'7
Print Name 10 � Y\ '�70vJ I-ey Signature_
Title: L�L�. ' eelo kelPlnc &-j
51 Date: 6;--/
Print Name q Co P I'`n i 1 r) Signattrr+
Title: ►)ceGt6JQiJ��� Ck�'f Q S� ��`Dater+ /
Print Name ����'1 O��a Ore Signature
TitleT(e6Je4, f0tv-1M O� 40'PCJ0- Date: % • 7 - -/7,
jf �" ' i-bmeaeSS
Print Name QIP S-� I-2u�IS gnature
Title:SLO U 4 0 RoLkS I Y Beni 'f Date: 6eI
Attach to the Statement of Authors Form submitted with the Argument
❑ In Favor of XAgainst Measure B-17
Rebuttal To Argument in Favor of Measure B-17
R ECEI
JUN 0 9 2017
Please vote NO on Measure B-17 to support affordable housing and to avoid poterifiiaf costly CLERK
lawsuits.
This measure was created to fight a law that is no longer in existence. The proponents'
argument is centered on a program that was repealed 5-0.
No future Council will bring back a program that was repealed by a unanimous vote, and
opposed so strongly by so many residents.
The initiative petition got thousands of signatures through misleading language and a desire to
remove the Rental Housing Inspection Program. The Council listened to the voices of the
people and got rid of the program.
Instead of celebrating an example of democracy working and a win for Fourth and Fifth
Amendment rights, the community is met with B-17, a good idea gone very bad.
The problem with B-17 is that no one really knows what the legal interpretation would be. That's
what the impartial legal analysis contained in this ballot pamphlet says. That's why so many
people who care about affordable housing are completely against it.
B-17 cannot reduce rent increases by dismantling our affordable housing programs.
Even the spokesperson of this ordinance recognized the harms contained in the "non-
discrimination" language and tried to fix it after the petitions were turned in, but it was too late.
There is no fixing of poorly written, legally unclear language.
Let's preserve San Luis Obispo's ability to help everyday people with affordable housing
programs and policies.
We urge you to vote NO on Measure B-17.
/s/
Julia Ogden, CEO, Habitat for Humanity
John Fowler, CEO, People's Self -Help Housing
Scott Smith, Executive Director, Housing Authority (HASLO)
John Spatafore, President, Friends of 40 Prado -Homeless Foundation
Dale Stoker, SLO U40 Housing & Renter Advocate