HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-10-2018 Item 4 - Rowley
Purrington, Teresa
From:Sandra Rowley <macsar99@yahoo.com>
Sent:Wednesday, January
To:Advisory Bodies; Davidson, Doug; Bell, Kyle
Cc:Gallagher, Carrie; Christian, Kevin
Subject:Planning Commission, Item 4
Chairman Stevenson and Planning Commissioners,
I wholly support the revisions proposed for Ordinance 1130. I, also, wholly support the comments made
in Allan Cooper's letter. City residents who live along the creek have long taken care of and watched over
the creek. The quality of life for each of them, regardless of the location of the portion of the creek that
abuts their property, is affected by development occurring on the opposite side of the creek. It is my
belief that all such creekside residents and residences should be, and need to be afforded the protections
of Ordinance 1130, as revised.
Additionally, I support Mr. Cooper's comments regarding S-overlay protections needed for the other
specified areas of downtown. One reason for the city policy of encouraging downtown residential
development was to provide 24/7 eyes and ears for the downtown businesses located there. It seems
only right that the City would, in return, provide them with some additional protections. Suggest staff be
provided guidance to prepare a similar ordinance for these areas.
Thank you for your time and the ability to provide these comments.
Sincerely
Sandra Rowley
SLO Resident
1