HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/13/2018 Item 3, Curtis
Tonikian, Victoria
From:Curtis, Ryan <curtisr@stifel.com>
Sent:Wednesday,
To:Advisory Bodies
Cc:Davidson, Doug; Bell, Kyle; Fowler, Xzandrea; 'djunke@sjmslaw.com';
'jdunning@calpoly.edu'; 'Charlene Rosales'
Subject:
To Whom it may concern,
As you proceed with the zoning update process, I believe that it is important that the system of checks and balances that
we have in the form of our advisory body process be reviewed. I think that the various advisory bodies serve an
important role in maintaining the high quality and unique feel of our town. However, I also have the impression that
over the years the various advisory bodies have all exceeded their specific purview and mandates, and that is an issue
that I think can and should be fixed now. I believe that the scope of power for each advisory body should be clearly
defined during the zoning update, and that a developer should have a clear rulebook to follow detailing what is and is
not within the scope of each advisory body. In general, I believe that a lot of good work went into updating the LUCE,
and I think that the goal of the zoning update should be to encourage the development of SLO in accordance with the
vision of the LUCE. My impression is that the current advisory review process is making that more difficult than it needs
to be, and I encourage you to address that issue during the zoning update process.
Thank you for your time, consideration, and hard work,
Ryan Curtis CFP®
Financial Advisor
Stifel Nicolaus
805-903-1070
www.RyanCurtisFinancial.com
1