HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/11/2018 Item 1, Trudell
Tonikian, Victoria
From:Carmen Trudell <ctrudell@calpoly.edu>
Sent:Monday, July 2,
To:CityClerk; Advisory Bodies; Brian M. Osborn
Subject:Re: Bressi Place Zoning Overlay
Dear City Planners & Commissioners,
My family and I live at 122 Bressi Place. We attended the Planning Commission meeting on June 27th and will plan to
attend on July 11th. We are in support of the proposed zoning changes on the Bressi Ranch properties, however, we still
have concerns about the subdivision of the four small existing homes in relation to this zoning change.
We request again that the subdivision be processed prior to the zoning change, and that the four homes (114, 115, 122,
and 123 Bressi Place) will not be included in the S overlay. It is our request that these homes have the same zoning as
the rest of the neighborhood with which they are contiguous (R-1). The notice that was sent out in regard to the July
11th meeting still draws the affected area for the zoning change including these four homes, although the addresses
have been removed from the description.
We will speak to this issue at the July 11th meeting if the maps have not been adjusted by that time.
Sincerely,
Carmen Trudell | Associate Professor | RA
Architecture Department | CAED | Cal Poly State University
ctrudell@calpoly.edu | 805.756.1316
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Carmen Trudell <ctrudell@calpoly.edu> wrote:
Hello!
I live at 122 Bressi Place. We are anticipating finalization of the subdivision of the 4 houses on Bressi Place to separate
them from the larger Bressi Ranch property.
I am concerned that the new S overlay is being processed BEFORE the subdivision and therefore will include the 4
residential lots that currently have homes on them (114, 115, 122, 123 Bressi Place). I would like to request that the
city instead complete the subdivision (MS 32-14 submitted in 09/2015) PRIOR TO revising the zoning of the property,
and apply the new S designation to only the remaining contiguous parcels at 141, 159, & 161 Broad Street. I am in favor
of the S overlay with this modification.
The fours homes on Bressi Place have already been developed and are therefore not part of the wildlife area. These
homes should therefore not have restrictions placed on future landscape and building improvements above what is
normal for an existing R-1 residential area.
Sincerely,
Carmen Trudell | Associate Professor | RA
Architecture Department | CAED | Cal Poly State University
ctrudell@calpoly.edu | 805.756.1316
1